Phase I study of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin concurrent with thoracic radiotherapy in Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This is the first report of a Phase I study on concomitant weekly cisplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy with thoracic radiation for Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study objectives were to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel used in this regimen, and to evaluate the feasibility of weekly concurrent chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with histologically proven and unresectable Stage III NSCLC were the subjects of this study. Cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 20 mg/m2, while the dose of docetaxel was increased from 0 to 30 mg/m2 in increments of 10 mg/m2. Chemotherapy was given on the first day of each week for 6 weeks. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were irradiated to 54 Gy, followed by an additional 9 Gy boost to the primary tumor, making the total dose 63 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction. RESULTS: Sixteen men and 2 women with advanced NSCLC without prior treatment were enrolled. The median age of the group was 58 years (range 49-67). Three patients had Stage IIIa disease and 15 patients had IIIb disease. Dose-limiting Grade 3 esophagitis was encountered at a docetaxel dose level of 30 mg/m2 in 2 of 3 patients. No dose-limiting, nonhematologic toxicity occurred in the other patients and no dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in any patient. CONCLUSION: The treatment schedule for NSCLC was feasible, with the DLT being esophagitis. We determined the recommended dose of docetaxel to be 20 mg/m2 for a Phase II study when combined with weekly cisplatin and concomitant thoracic RT.     

Phase I study of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concomitant external-beam radiotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

To determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity associated with twice-weekly gemcitabine and concomitant external-beam radiotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Twenty-one patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with external-beam radiotherapy to a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, concurrent with gemcitabine, infused over 30 min before irradiation on a Monday and Thursday schedule. The dose of gemcitabine was escalated in 5 cohorts of 3–6 patients each. Initial gemcitabine dose was 10 mg/m², with dose escalation until dose-limiting toxicity was observed.

The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 50 mg/m², when given in a twice-weekly schedule with radiation. Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in 2 patients at 60 mg/m², and consisted of severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding approximately 1 month after completion of treatment. Six patients had radiographic evidence of response to treatment, and 5 of these underwent complete surgical resection. Three patients who underwent complete resection had been deemed to have unresectable tumors before enrollment on trial. Four patients are alive, including 2 without evidence of disease more than 1 year after resection.

The combination of external-beam radiation and twice-weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 50 mg/m² is well tolerated and shows promising activity for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Our data suggest a higher maximum tolerated dose and different dose-limiting toxicity than previously reported. Further investigation of this regimen is warranted.     

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in pretreated patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are among the most active new agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are worth considering for second-line chemotherapy. In this phase I–II study, we combined gemcitabine and paclitaxel for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine doses were kept fixed at 1000 mg/m² on day 1 and 8, and paclitaxel doses were escalated from 90 mg/m² on day 1 of the 21-day cycle. Thirty-seven patients were treated at six different dose levels. Grade 4 neutropenia was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), since it occurred in two out of six patients treated at paclitaxel 240 mg/m²; the paclitaxel dose level just below (210 mg/m²) was selected for phase II evaluation. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. One complete response (CR) (3%) and 13 partial responses (PR) (36%) were observed in 36 evaluable patients for an overall response rate of 39% (95% C.I., 23–57%). Median duration of response was 35 weeks (range, 8–102). All of the observed objective responses occurred in the 19 patients who had previously responded to the first-line therapy. Median survival was 40 weeks (range, 8–108 weeks). The combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is a feasible, well-tolerated, and active scheme for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC; further evaluation, at least in selected patients, such as those previously responding to first-line chemotherapy, is definitely warranted.     

Phase I trial of fixed dose rate infusion gemcitabine with gefitinib in patients with pancreatic carcinoma

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of gemcitabine using a fixed dose rate infusion (FDRI) in combination with gefitinib in patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCa). Patients and methods: Patients with advanced PCa were given gemcitabine at the FDRI of 10 mg/m²/min IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose levels of 1000, 1200, and 1500 mg/m² were evaluated. Oral gefitinib 250 mg was given daily. DLTs were defined as 2 instances of Grade 3 hematologic or 4 nonhematologic or any Grade 4 hematologic toxicity. At least 4 patients were treated at each dose level. Dose escalation occurred in the absence of DLTs. Results: Five women and 8 men were enrolled. Median age was 59 and performance status 1. All had metastatic disease. Four patients received prior adjuvant chemoradiation for PCa, and one chemotherapy for lung cancer. Median cycles were 4 per patient. The MTD was 1,200 mg/m². Toxicity was predominantly hematologic. At 1,500 mg/m², 1 patient had Grade 4 granulocytopenia and 3 patients Grade 3 granulocytopenia. Overall, 8 patients (60 percent) developed Grade 1 or 2 acneiform rashes. One patient had Grade 3 vomiting; no significant diarrhea or liver toxicity was seen. There were no objective responses seen. Median time to progression and overall survival were 4.57 months and 7.13 months, respectively. Conclusion: Combining FDRI gemcitabine with gefitinib is feasible and tolerable. The recommended dose of gemcitabine is 1,200 mg/m² when used with gefitinib 250 mg daily.     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in advanced solid tumors

Purpose. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are chemotherapeutic agents with clinical antitumor activity in a broad range of malignant solid tumors. Because of preclinical synergy, unique mechanisms of action and resistance, and nonoverlapping toxicities, gemcitabine and paclitaxel combinations are attractive for testing in clinical trials. Prior weekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel regimens administered on a 28-day cycle have been limited by cumulative hematological toxicity on day 15, thus reducing the planned gemcitabine dose intensity. We therefore conducted a phase I trial of a 21-day schedule of weekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel to determine the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and preliminary estimates of efficacy of this regimen. Patients and Methods. Forty-one patients with advanced malignant solid tumors were accrued. Gemcitabine was given at a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m² while paclitaxel was administered at an initial dose of 60 mg/m², then escalated by 15 mg/m² increments over seven dose levels to a prospectively planned maximum dose of 150 mg/m². Both agents were infused intravenously on days one and eight every 21 days. At least three patients were enrolled per dose level. No intrapatient dose escalation was allowed. Results. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 31 were assessable for response. The regimen was generally well-tolerated. Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia was observed in one patient at a paclitaxel dose of 135 mg/m²/week (dose level 6). After expansion of this dose level by 14 additional patients, no further dose-limiting toxicities were observed although one patient at dose level seven died of neutropenic sepsis after completing three cycles. There were eight partial responders for an overall response proportion of 26% (95% CI: 11, 41). Twelve patients (39%) had stable disease. Conclusion. This 21-day schedule of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is safe, well-tolerated, and active. The recommended phase II dose is gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² and paclitaxel 150 mg/m² on days one and eight every 21 days. The antitumor activity observed with this regimen warrants further investigation.     

A phase I study of radiation therapy and twice-weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: In vitro studies suggest that low-dose gemcitabine sensitizes cells to radiation therapy and that this effect persists for 48 h after drug exposure. Cisplatin is a radiation sensitizer and is also synergistic with gemcitabine in some in vitro tumor systems. Gemcitabine's radiosensitizing properties can theoretically be exploited by twice-weekly administration. This study assessed toxicity in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiation therapy, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic or gastric cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were given twice weekly for 3 weeks during radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). The starting dose of gemcitabine was 5 mg/m(2) i.v. The starting dose for cisplatin was 5 mg/m(2). Chemotherapy doses escalated every 3 to 6 patients according to a standard Phase I study design. RESULTS: Twenty-four evaluable patients, all with pancreatic cancer, were treated on this protocol. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 2 patients, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2, and Grade 4 lymphopenia occurred in 1. There was no clear relationship between chemotherapy dose and hematologic toxicity. The most common Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxic responses were vomiting (7 patients) and nausea (7 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose Level 6 (gemcitabine 45 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.). Six patients were treated at dose Level 5 (gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.) without dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly may be given concurrently with radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with acceptable toxicity.     

A phase I study of a 24 hour infusion of gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of gemcitabine when given as a 24 h infusion to patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 24 patients with unresectable stage IIIa-IV NSCLC were entered into the study. Gemcitabine was administered as a 24 h infusion on days 0, 7 and 14. Courses of therapy were repeated every 28 days. There were 16 males and 8 females with a median age of 51 years (range 40-73 years). The WHO performance score was 1 (21 patients) or 2 (3 patients). The TNM stage was IIIa (6), IIIb (10) and IV (8). Three patients were entered at each dose level with six at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose levels were 10, 20, 40, 80, 120, 180 and 210 mg m-2. The MTD was 180 mg m-2 and dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia and lethargy. Partial response was observed in five (21%) patients (95% CI 7-42%) lasting 10, 14, 18, 47 and 51 + weeks. The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine given as a 24 h infusion was 180 mg m-2.     

Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy in combination with concurrent 3-D conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background and objective Recent studies have showed that combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy might result in better outcome for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to determine the maximal tolerance dose (MTD) and efficacy of full-dose gemcitabine and oxaliplatin when given concurrently with 3-dimentional radiation therapy (3D-RT) for locally advanced NSCLC. Methods Oxaliplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 130 mg/m2, and gemcitabine was administered at a starting dose of 800 mg/m2 with an incremental dose gradient of 200 mg/m2 for 3 dose levels. MTD was defined as the immediate dose level lower than the dose at which dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in more than one-third of the patients. The chemotherapy was administered at 3-week cycle. The RT was given as 3-D conformal manner at a single daily dose of 2 Gy for 5 days per week. Results Twenty-two patients were evaluable and distributed to three different dose levels: 6 at level 1, 8 at level 2 and 8 at level 3. Pulmonary toxicity, esophageal and hematologic toxicity were the main DLT. Grade Ⅲ acute pulmonary toxicity occurred in one patient each at level 2 and level 3, both with V20＞20%, and grade Ⅲ esophagitis in two patients at level 3. The MTD of gemcitabine in this study was 1000 mg/m2. The overall response rate was 75.0% (9/12). The 1- and 2-year survival rate was 70.0% and 30.5% respectively. The median time to progression was 8.7 months (range 5--11.8 months). Conclusion With reduced radiation volume, gemcitabine of 1000 mg/m2 in combination with oxaliplatin of 130 mg/m2 was effective and could be safely administered for NSCLC.     

A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-based front line chemotherapy

Purpose: A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of a CPT-11 plus cisplatin combination as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Twenty-two patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, who had failed taxotere-based front-line chemotherapy, were enrolled. The patients’ median age was 61 years, 19 (86%) were male, and 17 (77%) had a performance status (World Health Organization (WHO)) 0–1. CPT-11 was administered as a 60-min i.v. infusion at a fixed dose of 100 mg/m² on day 1 and at escalating doses on day 8, starting from 100 mg/m² with increments of 10 mg/m² ; cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m² on day 8, 2 h after CPT-11 administration. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Results: At the dose of CPT-11 120 mg/m² , three out of four enrolled patients presented DLTs (grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and delayed diarrhea); the addition of G-CSF at this level did not permit further dose-escalation. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 12 (18%) cycles, febrile neutropenia in four (6%), and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in four (6%). Grade 3/4 diarrhea was seen in six (29%) patients, and grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 12 (57%). Neurotoxicity grade 2 was observed in six (29%) patients and grade 3 in one (5%). Other toxicities were mild. The MTD was CPT-11 100 mg/m² on day 1 and 110 mg/m² on day 8 in combination with CDDP 80 mg/m² on day 8. Among 12 patients evaluable for response, partial response was achieved in two (16.7%) patients and stable disease in five (41.7%). Conclusion: The combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin has substantial but manageable toxicity and marginal activity as salvage treatment of patients with NSCLC who have failed taxotere-based front-line chemotherapy; further investigation is warranted to define its precise role in the second-line setting.     

A parallel dose-escalation study of weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of two schedules of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were assigned to increasing doses of bortezomib days 1 and 8 (weekly schedule) or days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (twice-weekly schedule), in addition to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 1, every 21 days. Maximum of six cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and gemcitabine were determined at MTD. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled of whom 27 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) in the weekly schedule. Febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with bleeding were dose-limiting toxicities in the twice-weekly schedule, leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) as well. Most common > or =grade 3 treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. No grade > or =3 treatment-related sensory neuropathy was reported. Of 34 evaluable patients, 13 achieved partial responses, 17 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. Response and survival of NSCLC patients treated with twice weekly or weekly bortezomib were similar. However, increased dose intensity of bortezomib led to increased gastrointestinal toxicity as well as myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetic profiles of cisplatin and gemcitabine were not significantly different in patients receiving either schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) is the recommended phase 2 schedule, constituting a safe combination, with activity in NSCLC.     

Phase II study with gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical activity and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination regimen of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP), administered every 3 weeks, in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From October 1998 to July 1999, 18 previously untreated stages IIIb (4) and IV (14) patients were enrolled into the study. Gemcitabine and ifosfamide (with mesna as uroprotection) was administered on days 1 and 6, at a dose of 1000 and 1500 mg/m², respectively; and cisplatin was given on day 1 at a dose of 60 mg/m², every 3 weeks. All 18 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity profiles. One patient achieved a complete response, and 11 patients achieved a partial response, with an overall response rate of 66.7% (95% CI, 45–89%). The main toxicity was hematological, a NCI grade 3–4 neutropenia in 16 patients (88.9%) during the treatment course. Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (16.6%). Grade 3 anemia occurred in eight patients (44.4%) and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 patients (61.1%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild and tolerable. No toxic death occurred. The median survival was 12.7 months and 1 year survival was 58.4%. The GIP combination chemotherapy produced a high response rate in advanced NSCLC; however, there was a relatively high percentage of hematological toxicity that still could be tolerated. A randomized trial comparing GIP to a two-drug combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is planned.     

Gemcitabine,paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. The initial dose level was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks. Concurrent radiation to 50.4 Gy was delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions. The radiation fields included the primary tumor, plus the regional peripancreatic, celiac, and porta hepatis lymph nodes. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and anorexia occurred in 3 of 3 patients at the second dose level of gemcitabine, 150 mg/m(2)/week. An intermediate dose level of gemcitabine, 110 mg/m(2)/week, was added, but gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary pneumonitis were encountered. The MTD therefore was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and concurrent radiation. Two of 11 patients treated at the MTD had Grade 3/4 toxicity. Four of 10 assessable patients treated at the MTD responded (40%), including one pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dosage of gemcitabine is 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and conventional 50.4 Gy radiation fields. A Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study is under way.     

A Phase I Study of Escalating Interferon Alpha-2A Combined with 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies

On the basis of preclinical data showing synergy between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) and IFN-alpha-2a, a phase I study was carried out to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of IFN-alpha-2a with this combination in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The treatment consisted of 370 mg/m² 5-FU and 200 mg/m², LV on days 1 to 5, and IFN-alpha-2a on days 1 to 5 of the first week of chemotherapy and on days 1, 3, 5 of each subsequent week, on a 28-day cycle. Six patients with colorectal, 3 with pancreas, 2 with oesophagus, 2 with hepatocellular and one with gastric cancer were treated. At level III (5 × lo⁶ U/m²) all patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity during the first 56 days of treatment and the MTD was declared level II. Grade 3 toxicity comprised of anorexia, mucositis, diarrhoea, and fatigue; in one instance, grade 4 neutropenia occurred. Ten patients were evaluable for response, one patient with an oesophageal cancer had a minor response and one patient with rectal cancer and liver metastases had a radiological complete response lasting 3 months. The recommended dose for this schedule in phase TI studies is 5-FU 370 mg/m², LV 200 mg/m², and IFN-alpha-2a 4 × 10⁶ U/m².     

Results of A trial with topotecan dose escalation and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for locally advanced, inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer

: To conduct a dose escalation clinical study with topotecan and concurrent standard dose thoracic irradiation to assess its feasibility and toxicity in the treatment of patients with locally advanced, inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLCA).

: Between April 1993 and August 1994, 12 patients with inoperable, loco-regionally advanced NSCLCA were entered in a prospective dose escalation trial and assigned to receive concurrent thoracic radiotherapy and topotecan. Patients received thoracic irradiation to a total tumor dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Initial fields were to encompass the gross disease plus the mediastinum. Topotecan was delivered by bolus injection days 1 through 5, and days 22 through 26, beginning on the same day as the radiation therapy. The initial dose level was 0.5 mg/m². Two additional dose levels of 0.75 mg/m² and 1.0 mg/m² were tested.

: Six patients were accessioned to the 0.5 mg/m² dose level, three patients to the 0.75 mg/m² dose level, and three patients to the 1.0 mg/m² dose level. At the 0.5 mg/m² dose level, zero of six patients had ≥Grade 4 hematologic toxicity. One of the six had Grade 3 esophagitis. At the 0.75 mg/m² dose level, two of three patients had ≥Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity including anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and weakness; zero patients experienced ≥Grade 4 hematologic toxicity. At the 1.0 mg/m² dose level one of three patients had ≥Grade 3 esophagitis, and two of three patients experienced Grade 4 neutropenia. With a follow-up of 12 to 24 months, two patients are alive and free of disease, three patients are alive with disease (two with distant metastasis, one with local disease and distant metastasis), and the remaining seven patients are dead of disease.

: The combination of topotecan and thoracic radiotherapy for nonsmall lung cancer, in the manner given by this protocol, could be safely given at a dose level of only 0.5 mg/m² days 1 to 5 and 22 to 26 with 60 Gy of external beam radiotherapy. Higher doses of topotecan were associated with high hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity. Distant metastasis was the primary pattern of failure.     

A Phase I study of gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in stage III, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to find the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine administered concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III NSCLC and a radiation planning volume less than 2000 cm(3) were included. Treatment consisted of 6 weeks of thoracic radiation, 2 Gy daily for 5 days a week for a total dose of 60 Gy. Planning with multiple field arrangements and three-dimensional conformal technique was used. Patients were treated with gemcitabine, starting with a dose of 300 mg/m(2) in the 1st week of radiation. In subsequent cohorts, the weekly dosing frequency of gemcitabine was increased until weekly administration was reached. Thereafter, the doses of weekly gemcitabine were increased. Toxicity was measured using Common Toxicity of the National Cancer Institute (CTC), acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), and late RTOG/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) rating scales. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included, of whom 14 had stage IIIa and 13 had stage IIIb. Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 esophagitis and grade 3 radiation pneumonitis in the patient cohort receiving gemcitabine 450 mg/m(2) once weekly. The mean actual treated radiation volume was 760 cm(3) (range, 289-1718 cm(3)). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and frequency of gemcitabine in locally advanced NSCLC is 300 mg/m(2) once weekly during 6 weeks of thoracic radiotherapy, as long as the treatment volume does not exceed 2000 cm(3).     

局部晚期鼻咽癌洛铂单周方案同期放疗初探

目的 探讨局部晚期鼻咽癌洛铂单药单周方案同期放疗中洛铂最大耐受剂量(MTD)。方法 选择18例Ⅲ-ⅣA期鼻咽癌初治患者,采用根治性IMRT同时进行洛铂剂量递增试验。洛铂初始剂量10 mg/m²,组间递增剂量为5 mg/m²,每个剂量组至少3位受试者。如无剂量限制性毒性反应则进入下一剂量组直至MTD,定期评价疗效及不良反应。结果 10、15 mg/m²剂量组各3例,20、25 mg/m²剂量组6例。25mg/m²组出现2例剂量限制性毒性反应,因此MTD确定为20 mg/m²。患者治疗结束后3个月,鼻咽部肿瘤和颈部阳性淋巴结临床缓解率为100%。主要毒性反应为骨髓抑制。结论 洛铂单药周方案同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的MTD为20mg/m²,该方案疗效可靠安全性较好,值得开展进一步临床研究。     

局部晚期鼻咽癌洛铂单周方案同期放疗初探

目的 探讨局部晚期鼻咽癌洛铂单药单周方案同期放疗中洛铂最大耐受剂量(MTD)。方法 选择18例Ⅲ-ⅣA期鼻咽癌初治患者,采用根治性IMRT同时进行洛铂剂量递增试验。洛铂初始剂量10 mg/m²,组间递增剂量为5 mg/m²,每个剂量组至少3位受试者。如无剂量限制性毒性反应则进入下一剂量组直至MTD,定期评价疗效及不良反应。结果 10、15 mg/m²剂量组各3例,20、25 mg/m²剂量组6例。25mg/m²组出现2例剂量限制性毒性反应,因此MTD确定为20 mg/m²。患者治疗结束后3个月,鼻咽部肿瘤和颈部阳性淋巴结临床缓解率为100%。主要毒性反应为骨髓抑制。结论 洛铂单药周方案同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的MTD为20mg/m²,该方案疗效可靠安全性较好,值得开展进一步临床研究。     

局部晚期胃癌术后卡培他滨同期调强放疗的Ⅰ期临床研究

目的 观察局部晚期胃癌术后卡培他滨同期调强放疗(IMRT)中,卡培他滨的最大耐受剂量(MTD)和剂量限制性毒性(DLT)。方法 入组标准为接受根治术(R₀切除)或非根治术(R₁、R₂切除),术后病理证实为T_xN (+) M₀期的近端或远端胃癌患者。共18例患者入组,其中R₀术12例、R₁术2例、R₂术4例。放疗采用IMRT技术,R₀术后总剂量45 Gy,1.8 Gy/次,5 次/周。R₁或R₂术后,对有肉眼或镜下肿瘤残存部位进行局部加量10.8 Gy分6次。卡培他滨剂量水平分5级,分别为625 mg/m²(Ⅰ级)、700 mg/m²(Ⅱ级)、800 mg/m²(Ⅲ级)、900 mg/m²(Ⅳ级)、1000 mg/m²(Ⅴ级),口服2 次/d。结果 最常见1~3级的不良反应为白细胞减少(89%)、食欲下降(83%)和恶心(83%)。Ⅰ级中1例出现3级食欲下降、恶心和4级呕吐。Ⅱ级中1例出现3级食欲下降和恶心。Ⅲ级时2例分别出现4级中性粒细胞减少和3级放射性食管炎。结论 局部晚期胃癌术后卡培他滨同期IMRT的MTD为800 mg/m²,2 次/d,DLT为恶心、呕吐、食欲下降、中性粒细胞减少和放射性食管炎。     

Prophylactic G-CSF and antibiotics enable a significant dose-escalation of triplet-chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the clinical benefit of a platinum-based doublet is only modest, therefore, attenuated dosed three-drug combinations are investigated. We hypothesized that with adequate support a full dosed chemotherapy triplet is feasible. The study was designed as a dose finding study of paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients. Paclitaxel was given as a 3-h infusion on day 1, followed by fixed doses of teniposide (or etoposide) 100 mg/m² days 1, 3, 5 and cisplatin 80 mg/m² day 1 every 3 weeks. As myelotoxicity was expected to be the dose-limiting toxicity, prophylactic G-CSF and antibiotic support was evaluated. Indeed, paclitaxel 120 mg/m² resulted in dose-limiting neutropenia, despite G-CSF support. Teniposide/etoposide day 1, 3, 5 was less myelotoxic compared to day 1, 2, 3. G-CSF support allowed paclitaxel dose-escalation to 250 mg/m². The addition of prophylactic antibiotics enabled dose-escalation to 275 mg/m² without reaching MTD. In conclusion, G-CSF and antibiotics prophylaxis enables the delivery of a full dosed chemotherapy triplet in previously untreated NSCLC patients.     

Concomitant weekly docetaxel,cisplatin and radiation therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a dose finding study

The optimal dose of weekly docetaxel in combination with cisplatin and concomitant thoracic radiation therapy (XRT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to define the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel in this combination. Eligible patients had unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC without pleural effusion. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel weekly and concomitant standard XRT for a total of 60 Gy at 200 cGy/fraction/day 5 times weekly for 6 weeks. The starting dose of docetaxel in the first cohort was 15 mg/m(2)/week. This dose was escalated by 5 mg/m(2) per cohort of 3 patients. No intrapatient dose escalation was allowed. The doses of cisplatin and XRT were not escalated. A total of 23 patients were enrolled, and 19 patients were evaluable for analysis. The first cohort (docetaxel 15 mg/m(2)/week) completed treatment without any Grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The second cohort (docetaxel 20 mg/m(2)/week) was expanded to 6 patients because of Grade 3 cough observed in 1 patient. One of 5 patients experienced Grade 3 esophagitis at the docetaxel 25 mg/m(2)/week dose level. Dose limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 3 esophagitis was reached in 4 of 5 patients receiving docetaxel at 30 mg/m(2)/week. This study determined the MTD of weekly docetaxel to be 25 mg/m(2) when combined with cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) and radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Further evaluation of this regimen in a phase II trial is underway.