Clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in patients with primary esophageal motor disorders

The development of miniaturized electronic pressure transducers and portable digital data recorders with large storage capacity has made ambulatory monitoring of esophageal motor function over an entire circadian cycle possible. Broad clinical application of this new technology in a large number of asymptomatic normal volunteers and patients with symptoms suggestive of a primary esophageal motor disorder provides new insights into esophageal motor function under a variety of physiologic conditions in health and disease. These studies suggest that ambulatory esophageal motility monitoring allows for a more precise classification of esophageal motor disorders than standard manometry and can identify abnormal esophageal motor patterns associated with nonobstructive dysphagia or noncardiac chest pain. Ambulatory esophageal motility monitoring performed in combination with pH monitoring is currently the most physiologic way to assess esophageal function and has potential to improve diagnosis and management of patients with esophageal motor disorders. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal motility monitoring should become the gold standard for assessing motor function of the esophageal body.     

Ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry discriminates between patients with different esophageal symptoms

Ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry has been used primarily in patients with chest pain of presumed esophageal origin, and it is unclear whether the discriminating power of this test applies to other esophageal symptoms. In the present study, prolonged ambulatory manometry/pH recordings were compared in 17 healthy controls, 12 patients with atypical chest pain, and 11 patients with chest pain and nonstructural dysphagia using the Synectics microdigitrapper system. Chest pain patients tended to have higher values for all the pH variables, but their esophageal motility parameters were no different than controls. On the other hand, the chest pain plus dysphagia group was characterized by a significantly lower proportion of propagated contractions between 10 and 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. This group also tended to have a higher frequency of high-amplitude or prolonged-duration contractions. In comparison to the results of standard stationary esophageal manometry, the prolonged ambulatory recordings were more sensitive in detecting esophageal motor dysfunction in the two patient groups. This study suggests that quantitative analysis of ambulatory pH/motility recordings is a sensitive method of evaluating patients with suspected esophageal dysfunction.Supported in part by grants from Janssen Pharmaceutica (Canada) and the MRC of Canada (grant MA9978). Dr. Paterson was supported by a Career Scientist Award from the Ontario Ministry of Health.     

Oropharyngeal and esophageal interrelationships in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia

Normal swallowing requires the close functional coordination of the mouth, pharynx, and esophagus, and if one of these components becomes functionally impaired, it is likely that the others may be affected. Using videofluoroscopy and manometry in this study, we examined the esophageal phase of swallowing in 12 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (group A) and the oropharyngeal components of swallowing in 29 patients with esophageal motor dysfunction and nonobstructive dysphagia (group B). A wide range of esophageal function abnormalities was seen in the first group, including delayed esophageal body peristalsis, spontaneous or simultaneous (tertiary) contractions, esophageal body dilation, proximal bolus redirection, and poor lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Manometrically, 92% of group A patients were classified as having nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NSEMD). In a similar fashion, group B patients exhibited many oropharyngeal function abnormalities on videofluorography including disturbed lingual peristalsis, slowed pharyngeal transit time with poor constriction of pharyngeal muscles, and laryngeal vestibular and tracheal bolus penetration. Manometrically, group B patients were classified as having NSEMD, achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, nutcracker esophagus, scleroderma, and chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction. In conclusion, oropharyngeal function is significantly altered in patients with esophageal motility disorders and dysphagia, and esophageal motor dysfunction occurs in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. These changes may represent either a compensatory mechanism or concomitant involvement of the oropharynx or the esophagus by the underlying neuromotor disorder. We suggest that assessment by esophageal motility and videofluoroscopy of both the oropharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing may improve diagnosis and therapy in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia.     

Optimal evaluation of patients with nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia

The aims of this study were to compare diagnostic accuracy, cost, and patient tolerance of videoesophagography and esophageal transit scintigraphy to esophageal manometry in the evaluation of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia. Eighty-nine consecutive patients underwent videoesophagography, scintigraphy, and manometry. The sensitivities for diagnosing specific esophageal motility disorders, using esophageal manometry as the standard, were 75% and 68% for videoesophagography and scintigraphy, respectively, with positive predictive accuracies of 96% and 95% for achalasia, 100% and 67% for diffuse esophageal spasm, 100% and 75% for scleroderma, 50% and 67% for isolated LES dysfunction, 57% and 48% for nonspecific esophageal motility disorders, and 70% and 68% for normal esophageal motility. The cost for videoesophagography is less than that for either manometry or scintigraphy. Both videoesophagography and scintigraphy were better tolerated than manometry. It is concluded that videoesophagography and scintigraphy accurately diagnose primary esophageal motility disorders, achalasia, scleroderma, and diffuse esophageal spasm, but are less accurate in distinguishing nonspecific esophageal motility disorders from normal. When considering accuracy, cost, and patient acceptance, these findings suggest that videoesophagography is a useful initial diagnostic study for the evaluation of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia.     

Use of radioisotopic esophageal transit in the assessment of patients with symptoms of reflux and non-specific esophageal motor disorders

The purposes of this study were to assess the esophageal clearance of a radioisotopic bolus in patients with symptoms of reflux and evaluate the impact of manometric abnormalities on scintigraphic esophageal transit. Esophageal clearance was assessed in a supine position and indicated by the retained radioactivity in the esophagus at 10, 20, 30 and 40 s after the ingestion of a liquid bolus labeled with 2 mCi 99 mTc-SC. The study included 214 consecutive patients with symptoms of reflux and 11 normal controls. The results were compared to the motility findings detected on manometry performed on a separate occasion. Esophageal manometry was normal in 93 patients. Nonspecific esophageal motor disorders were identified in 121 patients and were classified into: 'predominantly nonpropagated activity', 'predominantly low-amplitude peristaltic contractions' and 'miscellaneous disorders' diagnosed in 27, 47 and 47 patients, respectively. The radionuclide clearance was significantly delayed in the overall group of patients compared with that of normal controls (P < 0.001); in patients with reflux symptoms and nonspecific esophageal motor disorders compared with patients with reflux symptoms and 'normal manometry' (P < 0.01 at 20 s); and in patients with reflux symptoms and 'normal manometry' compared with the control group (P < 0.01 at 20 s). Abnormal radioisotope clearances were detected in 88% of patients with 'predominantly nonpropagated activity', in 70% of patients with 'predominantly low-amplitude peristaltic contractions' and in 57% of patients with 'miscellaneous disorders'. Radioisotopic esophageal clearance abnormalities are frequently observed in patients with reflux symptoms and are more likely to be associated to hypomotility disorders, i.e. nonpropagated motor activity or low-amplitude contractions.     

Correlation between the radiological observation of isolated tertiary waves on an esophagram and findings on high‐resolution esophageal manometry

Barium esophagrams are a frequently performed test, and radiological observations about potential abnormal esophageal motility, such as tertiary contractions, are commonly reported. We sought to assess the correlation between tertiary waves, and in particular isolated tertiary waves, on esophagrams and findings on non‐synchronous high‐resolution esophageal manometry. We retrospectively reviewed reports of esophagrams performed at a tertiary referral center and identified patients in whom tertiary waves were observed and a high‐resolution esophageal manometry had been performed. We defined two groups; group 1 was defined as patients with isolated tertiary waves, whereas group 2 had tertiary waves and evidence of achalasia or an obstructing structural abnormality on the esophagram. We collected data on demographics, dysphagia score, associated findings on esophagram, and need for intervention. We reviewed the reports of 2100 esophagrams of which tertiary waves were noted as an isolated abnormality in 92, and in association with achalasia or a structural obstruction in 61. High‐resolution manometry was performed in 17 patients in group 1, and five had evidence of a significant esophageal motility disorder and 4 required any intervention. Twenty‐one patients in group 2 underwent manometry, and 18 had a significant esophageal motility disorder. An isolated finding of tertiary waves on an esophagram is rarely associated with a significant esophageal motility disorder that requires intervention. All patients with isolated tertiary waves who required intervention had a dysphagia to liquids. Tertiary contractions, in the absence of dysphagia to liquids, indicate no significant esophageal motility disorder.     

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory versus stationary esophageal manometry in the evaluation of esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Although stationary manometry commonly reveals esophageal body motility disorders in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal function cannot be fully and precisely assessed during normal daily activities by this investigatory modality. AIM: To compare the results of 24-hour ambulatory manometry with those of stationary manometry and to determine the specificity and accuracy of the former to detect motility disorders in patients with GERD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 patients with documented GERD were included in the study. Clinical assessment, upper alimentary endoscopy and stationary manometry as well as 24-hour ambulatory manometry with concomitant 24-hour monitoring of the esophageal pH were performed in each patient. RESULTS: 24-hour ambulatory manometry revealed a significant number of dropped or interrupted esophageal contractions in patients who were found to have only complete peristalsis on stationary manometry. Furthermore, in certain patients, ambulatory manometry detected an increased incidence of dropped or interrupted contractions as compared to those recorded during stationary manometry. Ineffective contractions, suggestive of poor esophageal motility, although absent on stationary manometry, were detected in a large number of patients during a 24-hour period of recording. Also, the amplitude of esophageal contractions was clearly overestimated when evaluated by stationary manometry. CONCLUSIONS: 24-hour ambulatory esophageal manometry reveals esophageal motor abnormalities to a greater extent than those demonstrated at stationary manometry, in patients with GERD. This might be of significance in designing the treatment and predicting possible outcome.     

The effect of laparoscopic partial fundoplication on dysphagia, esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter motility

It has been suggested that dysphagia is less common after partial versus complete fundoplication. The mechanisms contributing to postoperative dysphagia remain unclear. The objective of the present prospective study was to investigate esophageal motility and the prevalence of dysphagia in patients who have undergone laparoscopic partial fundoplication. Symptoms, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics and esophageal body motility were evaluated prospectively in 62 patients before and after laparoscopic partial fundoplication: 33 women and 29 men with a mean age of 44 +/- 1.5 years (range, 21-71). The patients filled in symptom questionnaires and underwent stationary and ambulatory manometry and 24-h pH-metry before and after operation. A small but significant increase in LES pressure from 14.8 +/- 0.9 to 17.8 +/- 0.8 mmHg was seen after laparoscopic partial fundoplication. Further, LES characteristics and esophageal body motility were not different post- versus preoperation. Three months after surgery, dysphagia was present in eight patients. No differences in LES characteristics or body motility were present between patients with and without dysphagia. Six months after the operation dysphagia was present in only three patients (3.2% mild and 1.6% severe dysphagia). Adequate reflux control was obtained in 85% of the patients. Laparoscopic partial fundoplication offers adequate reflux control without affecting esophageal body motility and with a very low incidence of postoperative dysphagia.     

Nonobstructive Dysphagia in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Study with Combined Ambulatory pH and Motility Monitoring

Nonobstructive dysphagia is a common symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and may be present in up to 45% of patients. To elucidate the mechanism of dysphagia, stationary and ambulatory motility studies were performed in 10 controls and 27 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Sixteen patients had nonobstructive dysphagia and 11 had no dysphagia. During stationary studies, there was essentially no difference in esophageal body motility among all the groups. Lower esophageal sphincter manometry was similar in patients with or without dysphagia. On ambulatory motility, about 40% of contractions in the body of the esophagus were simultaneous in the supine position in controls and both groups of patients. The rate of simultaneous contractions decreased in the upright position and at mealtimes in controls and in patients without dysphagia, hut not in those with dysphagia. This resulted in a higher percentage (38%) of intraprandial simultaneous wave activity in patients with dysphagia than to those without dysphagia (23%) or in controls (13%) ( p < 0.05). Patients with reflux disease who suffer from nonobstructive dysphagia therefore have a motility disorder measurable on ambulatory motility studies which results in an increased percentage of nonperistaltic (simultaneous wave) activity during mealtimes.     

Nonobstructive Dysphagia in Reflux Esophagitis

Dysphagia in the absence of organic esophageal stricture may occur in patients with reflux esophagitis. Although the exact mechanism of this "nonobstructive dysphagia" (NOD) is not known, it is believed to be related to transient segmental esophageal motor disorder. The goals of this study were to determine the frequency of NOD in patients with reflux esophagitis and correlate it with esophageal pH and motility changes. Sixty-three consecutive patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction were studied with endoscopy, infusion esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Forty-seven had severe erosive esophagitis unresponsive to medical therapy; 16 with esophageal motility disorders were used as symptomatic controls. Twenty-eight of 63 patients studied experienced NOD during the 24-h pH study; 22 had esophagitis and six had esophageal dysmotility without esophagitis. NOD was noted with similar frequency in the two groups; 22/47 (46.8%) of patients with esophagitis and 6/16 (37.5%) with esophageal dysmotility experienced NOD during the period of study. NOD correlated with pH less than 4.0 in 88.6% of patients with esophagitis but in only 7% of patients with esophageal dysmotility (p less than 0.001). There was no difference in acid reflux patterns in esophagitis patients who experienced NOD (22/47), and in those who did not (25/47). There was no correlation between NOD and baseline esophageal motility abnormalities. In summary, 1) NOD is a common, intermittent symptom that occurred in up to 46.8% of esophagitis patients and 37.5% of symptomatic controls during the 24-h period of this study; 2) NOD correlates with esophageal pH less than 4.0 in patients with esophagitis and not in patients with esophageal dysmotility. These data strongly suggest that acid in the distal esophagus frequently triggers the sensation of dysphagia in esophagitis patients, but not in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Combined ambulatory intraesophageal motility and pH monitoring may further elucidate the mechanism of dysphagia in these patients.     

Reoperations after esophagomyotomy in esophageal motility disorders

Out of 96 patients with the diagnosis of primary esophageal motor disorders and treated by esophagomyotomy, a group of 9 patients is reported in whom reoperation was necessary because of persistence or worsening of the previous symptoms (8 patients) or persistent reflux esophagitis (one patient). Clinical and laboratory examinations together with the operative findings allowed classification of these patients: incomplete myotomy proximally (4 patients) or distally (one patient), fibrotic scar at the site of previous myotomy (2 patients), persistence of intact muscle fibers (one patient) and reflux esophagitis for lack of an antireflux intervention during myotomy. Treatment consisted of completing myotomy proximally or distally, resection of the fibrous tissue and an antireflux operation when indicated. Clinical results were excellent in 6 patients (66.6%), fair in 2 patients (22.2%) and bad in one case (11.1%). Fair or bad results were seen in patients with total absence of motor response to deglutition. After operation there was disappearance of vigorous contractions in the esophagus, as shown by manometry and recovery of esophageal peristalsis in another patient. We conclude that in order to improve the results of the surgical treatment of motor esophageal disorders it is essential to correctly classify the type of disorder present by means of manometry and to add a partial funduplication to ensure absence of reflux without dysphagia.     

Ambulatory esophageal pressure and pH monitoring in patients with high-grade reflux esophagitis

Using conventional manometry and 24-hr ambulatory pressure and pH monitoring, we investigated esophageal motility and the esophageal motor response to reflux in 11 patients with reflux esophagitis Savary-Miller grade III and IV, and an age- and sex-matched group of 11 healthy controls. The patients had a significantly increased esophageal acid exposure. Conventional manometry showed a significantly decreased LES pressure and distal peristaltic amplitude in patients. The 24-hr monitoring yielded a significant decrease in peristaltic contraction duration and peristaltic propagation velocity in the patient group. Distal peristaltic amplitude was not decreased. Analysis of the contractions occurring in the 2-min period after each reflux episode showed a reduced number of contractions during the upright period, caused by a significantly decreased number of peristaltic contractions. During the supine period, there was a trend towards an increased number of contractions. It is concluded that esophageal motor activity and the response to reflux are impaired in patients with high-grade reflux esophagitis. However, the abnormalities found are only minor and are unlikely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.     

Unexplained dysphagia: Viscous swallow-induced esophageal dysmotility

Dysphagia is a manifestation of several clinical conditions of diverse origin. In spite of the variation in these disease entities in terms of their etiology, clinical presentation, natural history, and treatment, the mechanism of this clinical complaint is not always clear. We studied a group of patients with dysphagia for solids in whom no anatomic or motor abnormalities were encountered on standard studies. The group consisted of 37 patients, 25 women and 12 men, who were complaining of dysphagia of 6 months or longer duration and they did not demonstrate structural or motor abnormalities on barium esophagogram, esophagoscopy, and standard esophageal manometry. A group of 24 age-matched patients, 14 women and 10 men, with noncardiac chest pain served as the patient control. Esophageal contractile activities were studied after 10 wet swallows (5 ml of water) and 10 viscous swallows (5 cubic cm of marshmallow). Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure and its relaxation response to swallows, amplitude of peristaltic activities, rate of dysphagia provoked during the study, and the frequency of abnormal esophageal contractions were evaluated. Six abnormal esophageal contractile activities—failed peristalsis, dropout, repetitive, simultaneous, spontaneous contractions, and aperistalsis—were utilized to generate an esophageal peristaltic dysfunction index. The mean LESP was 8.1±4.7 in the dysphagia group and 16.1±4.3 in the chest pain group. The mean amplitude of peristaltic contractions was 47.1±16.1 and 89.0±27.0 mmHg after wet swallows for dysphagia and chest pain groups, respectively. These values were 58.2±12.4 and 92.4±22.1 for viscous swallows. Swallowing provoked dysphagia in 89% of the dysphagia group after viscous swallows and 9% after wet swallows. In contrast, only 11% and 3% of control group complained of dysphagia during the study. This group of patients probably represent a cohort of patients with a nonspecific esophageal motor disorder in whom both clinical symptom and their esophageal motor counterpart can only be elicited in response to viscous swallows. We strongly believe in addition of viscous swallows in evaluating dysphagic patients in whom symptoms remain unexplained in light of standard studies.     

Utility of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH and motility monitoring in noncardiac chest pain: report of 90 patients and review of the literature

It is unclear whether prolonged motility monitoring improves the diagnostic yield of standard esophageal tests in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of ambulatory 24-hr pH and pressure monitoring in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Stationary manometry, edrophonium testing, and ambulatory pH and motility studies were performed in 90 consecutive patients with recurrent chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Normality limits of ambulatory 24-hr motility were established in 30 healthy controls. The diagnoses of specific esophageal motility disorders (nutcracker esophagus and diffuse esophageal spasm) by stationary and ambulatory manometry were discordant in 48% of the patients. Edrophonium testing was positive in 9 patients, but correlated poorly with esophageal diagnoses. During ambulatory studies, 144 chest pain events occurred in 42 patients, and 72 (50%) were related to esophageal dysfunction. Strict temporal associations of events with esophageal dysfunction in relation to ambulatory 24-hr pH'motility scores permitted four patient categorizations: true positives (event-related and abnormal tests), N = 15; true negatives (event-unrelated and abnormal tests), N = 10; reduced esophageal pain threshold (event-related and normal tests), N = 4; and indeterminate origin (event-unrelated and normal tests), N = 13. Overall, 19 patients (21%) had a probable esophageal cause for chest pain (14 esophageal motility disorder, 4 acid reflux, 1 both). In conclusion, ambulatory manometry increases the diagnostic yield of standard esophageal testing in noncardiac chest pain, but the gain is small. Causes of chest pain other than high esophageal pressures and acid reflux must still be sought in most patients with chest pain of unknown origin after a negative cardiac work-up.     

Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis

Gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility were studied for 24 hr in 32 ambulatory healthy volunteers (20–73 years old), using a newly developed system, consisting of a microprocessorbased data recorder and algorithms for fully automated data analysis. Physiological reflux was more extensive than expected on the basis of widely used normal values. The percentage of time with pH<4 and the duration of the reflux episodes increased with age. Of the more than 2000 esophageal contractions occurring per day, peristaltic contractions constituted 50.9±2.0%. Their amplitude was significantly lower between meals than during meals and during the night. The duration of the peristaltic contractions increased with age. Simultaneous contractions constituted 10.4±1.2% of the esophageal contractions. Their incidence increased with age. We conclude that continuous ambulatory 24- hr recording with automated analysis of esophageal motility and pH profile is feasible, that the upper limits of normal in ambulatory esophageal pH recording are higher than previously accepted, and that age, meals, and body position must be taken into account in the interpretation of both 24-hr esophageal pH and pressure data.     

Treatment of idiopathic achalasia with per-oral esophageal myotomy

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder that necessitates the disruption of the lower esophageal sphincter. Patients with achalasia should be evaluated in a systematic, multidisciplinary fashion. Workup should include upper endoscopy, esophagography, and high-resolution manometry. The gold standard for surgical treatment is laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication. Per-oral esophageal myotomy is a novel endoscopic technique that has gained considerable traction over the past decade. The procedure includes the creation of a submucosal tunnel and a selective circular myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter. Common intra-operative hazards include bleeding within the submucosal tunnel and capnoperitoneum. Significant complications are rare. Patients experience excellent dysphagia relief that is on par with laparoscopic Heller myotomy at moderate-term follow up. Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease occurs in greater than one-third of patients, and the vast majority of cases are readily controlled with an anti-secretory medication. Although data is sparse, there is a growing body of literature that supports the long-term durability of per-oral esophageal myotomy.     

Diffuse esophageal spasm: not diffuse but distal esophageal spasm (DES)

Diffuse esophageal spasm is an uncommon motility disorder that is found in less than 5% of patients undergoing esophageal motility testing for dysphagia. It is defined manometrically by the presence of 20% or more simultaneous contractions in the distal esophageal body with normal peristalsis. This motility abnormality has been traditionally identified as occurring primarily in the smooth muscle portion of the distal esophagus yet, the term diffuse persists in the medical literature to identify DES. The aim of our study was to assess the diffuse or limited nature of this entity by evaluating the prevalence of simultaneous contractions in both proximal and distal esophagus in patients with DES. We reviewed esophageal motility tracings of 53 consecutive patients (32 F, 21 M) with DES and compared them with 53 age-matched patients with manometric normal studies. In the distal esophagus we found 195 simultaneous contractions (37% of swallows) with a median of 3 and range of 2–7 per patient. Of the 53 patients with DES a total of 13 simultaneous contractions (2% of swallows) occurred in the proximal esophagus with only 3 (5.6%) of the 53 patients having 2 or more simultaneous contractions in 10 swallows. None of the patients with normal manometry showed more than one simultaneous contraction in either proximal or distal esophagus. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the term diffuse esophageal spasm is a misnomer and the DES is more appropriately described as distal esophageal spasm.     

Evaluation of esophageal motility disorders triggered by ingestion of solids in the case of non-obstructive dysphagia]

The aim of this study was to define the normal manometric pattern of esophageal motility in response to food ingestion and to evaluate the contribution of esophageal manometry in the management of patients complaining of functional dysphagia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers and 25 consecutive patients complaining of functional dysphagia with normal conventional esophageal manometry were included in this prospective study. An event marker was used to study the relationship between dysphagia and motility events. RESULTS: Twenty-two out of 25 patients (88%) reported dysphagia during esophageal manometry with food ingestion, while none complained of dysphagia during conventional esophageal manometry. Significantly, food ingestion induced in healthy volunteers and in patients: an increase in the amplitude and duration of esophageal body peristaltic contractions, and a decrease in their propagation speed; an increase in the basal pressure and a decrease in the relaxation percentage of the lower esophageal sphincter during deglutition. The percentage of solid swallows with one or several of the 7 abnormal motility patterns studied prospectively was significantly higher among patients (53.7%) than among healthy volunteers (4.3%) (P < 0.0001); it was also significantly higher among patients during swallows with dysphagia (70.1%) than without dysphagia (33.6%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Esophageal manometry with food ingestion is an effective means of defining abnormal motility patterns and their relationship with dysphagia during functional dysphagia.     

Interaction of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility

The present study addresses the question of whether esophageal motility shortly before, during, and after gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is different in patients with GER disease and healthy controls. Twenty-four-hour continuous recordings of intraesophageal pressures and pH were performed in 12 unselected patients with clinically proven GER disease and in 11 volunteers using a new ambulatory and digital recording device. All GER episodes in each studied subject were classified according to their associated motility pattern shortly before (induction period) and during (response period) GER. More GER episodes were analyzed in patients than in volunteers (median: 41 vs 26, P<0.05), and a total of 917 GER episodes (593 in patients, 324 in volunteers) was recorded. During the induction period patients more often had irregular esophageal contractions (median: 23% vs 13%, P<0.05) and less often had a peristaltic sequence (median: 6% vs 21%) than normals. No difference between patients and controls existed when comparing the frequency of negative pressure peaks or common cavity phenomena shortly before GER. During the response period peristaltic motility in patients was decreased (median: 10% vs 47%, P<0.05). We conclude that: (1) GER events in GER patients are more often associated with irregular esophageal contractions than in healthy controls; (2) GER patients present with a diminished, if any, esophageal peristalsis during GER; and (3) combined ambulatory manometry and pH-metry provides clinically useful information on the individual pathogenesis of GER disease, which is superior to the information retrieved by pH-metry alone.Preliminary results from this study were presented at the Third International Polydisciplinary Congress on Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders in Paris, held from May 19th until 23th 1990.     

Endoscopic dilation for treatment of esophageal motility disorders

Esophageal dilation is an important therapeutic strategy in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Patients with achalasia have for many years benefited from pneumatic dilation as a definitive form of therapy, which is superior to botulinum toxin injection and equivalent in efficacy to surgical myotomy. Optimal performance of pneumatic dilation ensures maximum efficacy and reduced complication of perforation. Esophageal dilation also plays a crucial role in esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction due to strictures or prior surgical interventions as well as in esophageal hypercontractile states such as spastic disorders or in those with nonobstructive dysphagia. In this section, we will review the clinical evidence of esophageal dilation in achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, esophageal spastic disorders and in patients with dysphagia and nonobstructive dysphagia. We will outline specific techniques currently recommended and employed in esophageal dilations for these disorders and provide relative efficacy to other forms of therapy.