Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the induction of anesthesia is not without risk because of specific cardiovascular effects of the anesthetic and the preoperative state of the patient. The hemodynamic effects of etomidate, midazolam, thiopental, and methohexital are well known: etomidate is an anesthetic that induces only minor cardiovascular changes; its influence on the endocrine system, however, has reduced its clinical indication. Barbiturates such as thiopental and methohexital produce negative inotropic effects in combination with an increase in heart rate and myocardial oxygen consumption; midazolam reduces pre- and afterload in patients with poor left ventricular function. Propofol, a new short-acting induction agent with good anesthetic properties, is said to diminish arterial pressure as well as myocardial oxygen consumption. METHODS: In a randomized study we investigated the hemodynamic effects of intravenous induction with propofol (2 mg/kg body wt.), thiopental (5 mg/kg), methohexital (1 mg/kg), etomidate (0.3 mg/kg), and midazolam (0.15 mg/kg) in 50 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients were premedicated with flunitrazepam (0.03 mg/kg up to 2 mg) and morphine hydrochloride (0.2 mg/kg up to 15 mg) 100 min before the investigation. After 0.003 mg/kg fentanyl the patients received the induction agent in the above-mentioned dosage within 40 s followed by 0.1 mg/kg pancuronium bromide. Hemodynamic measurements were performed 1, 3, and 5 min after the end of the injection as well as 1 and 5 min after intubation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

静脉麻醉药抑制利多卡因致大鼠惊厥作用的比较

目的比较静脉麻醉药丙泊酚、依托咪酯、咪达唑仑及硫喷妥钠拮抗利多卡因致大鼠惊厥的作用。方法雄性Wistar大鼠36只,体重(250±20)g,随机均分为六组:空白对照组(C组)、利多卡因组(L组:利多卡因4mg·kg-1·min-1)、利多卡因+丙泊酚组(P组:利多卡因+丙泊酚12.5mg/kg)、利多卡因+依托咪酯组(E组:利多卡因+依托咪酯1.85mg/kg)、利多卡因+咪达唑仑组(M组:利多卡因+咪达唑仑0.65mg/kg)和利多卡因+硫喷妥钠组(T组:利多卡因+硫喷妥钠30.85mg/kg),惊厥后2h处死大鼠,取出脑组织分离双侧海马,一侧用于检测c-fos阳性细胞蛋白的表达。另一侧用于测定一氧化氮(NO)含量及一氧化氮合酶(NOS)活性。结果除C组外,其它五组大鼠均出现了惊厥,给予静脉麻醉药抑制惊厥,五组惊厥持续时间差异无统计学意义。L、P、E、M和T组c-fos阳性细胞表达、NO含量和NOS活性显著高于C组(P<0.05);P、E、M和T组c-fos阳性细胞表达、NO含量及NOS活性均显著降低于L组(P<0.05);M、T组c-fos阳性细胞表达、NO含量及NOS活性显著低于P、E组(P<0.05)。结论静脉麻醉药咪达唑仑、丙泊酚、依托咪酯及硫喷妥钠均可有效抑制利多卡因致惊厥作用,其中咪达唑仑与硫喷妥钠效果更显著。     

Comparison of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block at the masseter and adductor pollicis muscle

Adequate relaxation of the masseter muscle is important during endotracheal intubation and for the patency of a patient's airway during recovery from anaesthesia. We evaluated onset and recovery from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block at the masseter and adductor pollicis muscles. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.1 or 0.15 mg kg(-1) cisatracurium. The evoked response was measured at both muscles using acceleromyography. Onset time was significantly shorter at the masseter muscle than at the adductor pollicis (0.1 mg kg(-1) cisatracurium: 155+/-52 vs. 229+/-44 s; 0.15 mg kg(-1) cisatracurium: 105+/-24 vs. 174+/-35 s). Following 0.1 mg kg(-1) cisatracurium, recovery to a TOF-ratio of 0.7 was faster at the masseter compared to the adductor pollicis (P < 0.05). In the 0.15 mg kg(-1) cisatracurium group recovery of T1 to 75% of control and to a TOF-ratio of 0.7 occurred sooner at the masseter (P < 0.05). We conclude that onset and recovery from cisatracurium neuromuscular block occurs more rapidly at the masseter than at the adductor pollicis. It appears unlikely that residual paralysis is present at the masseter once neuromuscular function at the adductor pollicis has completely recovered.     

四种常用静脉麻醉药对老年病人血液动力学影响的比较

目的 探讨脑电双频指数(BIS)为50时，硫喷妥钠、丙泊酚、咪唑安定、依托咪酯用于老年病人全麻诱导的剂量及其对血液动力学的影响。方法 65岁以上的老年病人48例，随机分为四组：硫喷妥钠组，丙泊酚组，咪唑安定组，依托咪酯组。四组均缓慢静注，并且用HXD-1型脑电监测仪测量每例病人的BIS。当BIS逐渐下降至50时停止静注，分别于注药前、注药后1、3、5、10min用Rheo Cardio Monitor连续非创伤性血液动力监测仪记录和计算出血液动力学有关参数。结果 BP下降以丙泊酚组为显著。丙泊酚组和硫喷妥钠组的PEP/LVEF比值明显增加，但丙泊酚组＞硫喷妥钠组。除依托咪酯组以外其他各组的每搏指数(SD、心脏指数(CI)、射血速率(EV)和每搏功(LVP)均有不同程度的降低，但以丙泊酚组为显著。依托咪酯组体循环血管阻力(SVR)无明显变化，硫喷妥钠组和咪唑安定组均有不同程度的升高，以咪唑安定组为显著，丙泊酚组明显下降。舒张末容量(EDV)咪唑安定组明显下降，其他各组无明显变化。结论 四种静脉麻醉药对老年病人血液动力学的影响由大到小依次为丙泊酚＞咪唑安定＞硫喷妥钠＞依托咪酯。BIS为50时，老年病人各静脉麻醉药的等效剂量为硫喷妥钠4mg／kg、丙泊酚1．2mg／kg、咪唑安定0．16mg／kg、依托咪酯0．34mg／kg。对于心功能较差和血容量不足的老年病人全麻诱导，依托咪酯是首选的静脉麻醉诱导药。     

不同剂量顺式阿曲库铵对患者拇内收肌与眼轮匝肌肌松效应的比较

目的 比较不同剂量顺式阿曲库铵对患者拇内收肌与眼轮匝肌的肌松效应.方法 全麻患者25例,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄42～64岁,体重51～81 kg,随机分为2组,顺式阿曲库铵0.075ms/ks组(Ⅰ组,n=11)和顺式阿曲库铵0.15 mg/kg组(Ⅱ组,n=14).静脉注射咪达唑仑0.035～0.045mg/kg、异丙酚1.5～2 mg/kg、芬太尼0.1～0.2 mg、顺式阿曲库铵0.075 mg/kg或0.15 mg/kg行麻醉诱导,吸入50%氧化亚氮、间断静脉注射芬太尼维持麻醉.采用2台TOF-Watch SX加速度肌松监测仪同步监测眼轮匝肌和拇内收肌的神经肌肉阻滞情况,记录肌松起效时间、无反应期及T25%和T75%恢复时间.于眼轮匝肌肌颤搐抑制75%～80%时行气管插管,并评价气管插管条件.结果 2组气管插管条件良好且差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组拇内收肌和眼轮匝肌肌松起效时间缩短,T25%恢复时间、T75%恢复时间和无反应期延长(P<0.01);与拇内收肌比较,Ⅰ组眼轮匝肌T75%恢复时间缩短,Ⅱ组眼轮匝肌无反应期和T25%恢复时间缩短(P<0.05或0.01).结论 顺式阿曲库铵对拇内收肌和眼轮匝肌的肌松效应呈剂量依赖性,眼轮匝肌对顺式阿曲库铵的敏感性低于拇内收肌;监测顺式阿曲库铵对眼轮匝肌神经肌肉阻滞情况可有效指导气管插管.     

Comparison of the Neuromuscular Blocking Effect of Atracurium and Vecuronium on the Adductor Pollicis and the Geniohyoid Muscle in Humans

Background: Residual paralysis of suprahyoid muscles may occur when the adductor pollicis response has completely recovered after the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent. The response of the geniohyoid muscle to intubating doses of muscle relaxants is evaluated and compared to that of adductor pollicis.

Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were given 5-7 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 thiopental and 2 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 fentanyl intravenously for induction of anesthesia. Eight (half) patients then received 0.5 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 atracurium, and the other eight received 0.1 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 vecuronium. The evoked response (twitch height, TH) of the adductor pollicis was monitored by measuring the integrated electromyographic response (AP EMG) on one limb and the mechanical response, using a force transducer (AP force), on the other. The activity of geniohyoid muscle (GH EMG) was measured using submental percutaneous electrodes. The following variables were measured: maximal TH depression; onset time for neuromuscular blockade to 50%, 90%, and maximal TH depression (OT50, OT90, and OTmax); times between administration of neuromuscular blocking agent and TH recovery to 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90% of control; and time for return of train-of-four ratio to return to 0.7.

Results: The principal findings were (1) OTmax was significantly (P < 0.01) shorter for geniohyoid than for adductor pollicis after either atracurium or vecuronium (OTmax was 216, 256, and 175 s for AP force, AP EMG, and GH EMG, with atracurium and 181, 199, and 144 s with vecuronium, respectively), and (2) the evoked EMG of geniohyoid recovered at the same speed as the EMG of adductor pollicis after an intubating dose of atracurium or vecuronium (recovery of TH to 75% of control at 50, 48, 42 min with AP force, AP EMG, and GH EMG with atracurium and 46, 45, and 42 min with vecuronium, respectively).     

Comparison of the Effects of Etomidate, Propofol, and Thiopental on Respiratory Resistance after Tracheal Intubation

Background: Tracheal intubation frequently results in reversible bronchoconstriction. Propofol has been reported to minimize this response in healthy patients and in asthma patients, but may be unsuitable for hemodynamically unstable patients for whom etomidate may be preferable. The current study examined respiratory resistance after tracheal intubation after induction with either thiopental, etomidate, or propofol. A supratherapeutic dose of etomidate was used to test the hypothesis that the bronchoconstrictive response could be minimized by deep intravenous anesthesia.

Methods: Seventy-seven studies were conducted in 75 patients. Anesthesia was induced with either 2.5 mg/kg propofol, 0.4 mg/kg etomidate, or 5 mg/kg thiopental. Respiratory resistance was measured at 2 min after induction.

Results: Respiratory resistance at 2 min was 8.1+/-3.4 cmH sub 2 O *symbol* l sup -1 *symbol* s (mean+/-SD) for patients receiving propofol versus 11.3+/-5.3 for patients receiving etomidate and 12.3+/-7.9 for patients receiving thiopental (P less than or equal to 0.05 for propofol vs. either etomidate or thiopental).     

Comparison of etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental on function and metabolism of isolated hearts.

The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during atrial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5 microM to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10 microM no significant changes were observed; beyond 50 microM for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100 microM for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dtmax, percent oxygen extraction, and MVo2. The concentrations (microM) at which +dLVP/dtmax was reduced by 50% were as follows: etomidate, 82 +/- 2 (mean +/- SEM); propofol, 91 +/- 4; midazolam, 105 +/- 8; thiopental, 156 +/- 11; and ketamine, 323 +/- 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam greater than thiopental greater than ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100 microM concentration, CF was decreased 11% +/- 2% by ketamine and 5% +/- 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% +/- 6% by etomidate, 21% +/- 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% +/- 10% by propofol; MVo2 was decreased 8% +/- 4% by thiopental, 10% +/- 5% by ketamine, 19% +/- 5% by midazolam, 29% +/- 7% by etomidate, and 37% +/- 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVo2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% +/- 7% by midazolam, 71% +/- 9% by etomidate, and 150% +/- 15% by propofol. Between 100 microM and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVo2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVo2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.     

Acceleromyography of the orbicularis oculi muscle II: comparing the orbicularis oculi and adductor pollicis muscles

BACKGROUND: The orbicularis oculi (OO) muscle has been recommended for neuromuscular monitoring when the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle is not available. We investigated whether neuromuscular block could be measured reliably from the orbital part of the OO muscle by the use of acceleromyography. METHODS: During propofol, fentanyl, and alfentanil anaesthesia two TOF-Guards (Organon Teknika NV, Boxtel, the Netherlands) with acceleration transducers placed on the distal phalanx of the thumb and over the middle of the eyebrow, respectively, were used to measure neuromuscular block simultaneously in 23 patients during vecuronium-induced and neostigmine-antagonized neuromuscular block. For both muscles, the simultaneously recorded first response (T1) in the train-of-four (TOF) and TOF-ratio were measured both during onset and recovery of the block. Furthermore, both the AP muscle T1 and TOF-ratio responses were plotted against 10% intervals of the OO muscle responses during onset and recovery, respectively. RESULTS: The orbicularis oculi muscle had a shorter latency and a faster recovery to TOF-ratio 0.80 compared with the AP muscle. During onset and recovery, pronounced variations of the AP muscle T1 and TOF-ratio responses were observed when compared with the OO muscle. CONCLUSION: A significant clinical disagreement exists between the degree of paralysis measured at the OO and the AP muscles. It is impossible to obtain a reasonable estimate of the degree of block at the AP muscle when the block is measured from the OO muscle with acceleromyography. If used, there is substantial risk of overlooking a residual block, and adequate recovery of the block should be confirmed by a final AP muscle measurement.     

Changes in the auditory evoked potentials index by induction doses of four different intravenous anesthetics

BACKGROUND: Many studies have investigated the electroencephalographic changes during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, no comparative studies have been performed on the effects of intravenous anesthetics on the auditory evoked potentials index (AAI). The present study was performed to compare the changes in AAI caused by induction doses of thiopental, propofol, midazolam and ketamine. METHODS: Eighty females, aged 30-70 years, referred for mastectomy, had anesthesia induced with thiopental 4 mg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg or ketamine 1 mg/kg (each 20 patients). The response to verbal command and the AAI were measured every minute for 5 min. RESULTS: The AAI decreased to less than 40 within 1 min with thiopental and propofol. The AAI increased after 3 min with thiopental, but remained low with propofol. The AAI gradually decreased to less than 40 within 4 min with midazolam, but was higher than the AAI with propofol or thiopental. The AAI increased significantly with ketamine. The AAIs at the loss of verbal command were 19 +/- 7 with thiopental, 21 +/- 8 with propofol, 31 +/- 10 with midazolam and 92 +/- 2 with ketamine. CONCLUSION: The AAI correlated with changes in hypnotic level, as measured by the response to verbal command, with induction doses of thiopental, propofol and midazolam, but not with ketamine. The AAI decreased to lower levels with propofol and thiopental than with midazolam at the induction of anesthesia.     

Dominance of the hand does not change the phonomyographic measurement of neuromuscular block at the adductor pollicis muscle

Phonomyography (PMG) is a novel method to determine neuromuscular blockade (NMB) with high sensitivity and applicability at all muscles. The adductor pollicis muscle has long been used in research and clinical practice as reference for neuromuscular monitoring. The goal of our study was to compare PMG signals (train-of-four [TOF] ratios and T(1)/T(0) values) from both hands of the same patient to investigate the influence of hand dominance on neuromuscular monitoring. In 14 patients, PMG was recorded via small piezoelectric microphones taped over the thenar mass of both hands. After induction of anesthesia, both ulnar nerves were stimulated supramaximally using TOF stimulation every 12 s. Mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg was administered within 5 s. Onset, maximum effect, and offset of NMB were compared between both adductor pollicis muscles. Twelve patients were right-handed and two patients were left-handed. No statistical difference was found between the signals from the dominant or nondominant hand. Correlation was very good (r = 0.95). Agreement was excellent with a bias of -0.57% and limits of agreement of -17.9% to 16.7% (dominant - nondominant hand). This study shows minimal bias, good correlation and no statistical difference when NMB is monitored at both the dominant and nondominant adductor pollicis muscles. Both hands could be used interchangeably to assess NMB at the adductor pollicis muscle.     

Comparative study of propofol with thiopental and etomidate in anesthetic induction]

Anesthetic characteristics were studied in three homogeneous groups of twenty patients ASA I who underwent intravenous anesthetic induction with propofol 2 mg/kg; thiopental 5 mg/kg; or etomidate 0.3 mg/kg. The unconsciousness time was similar in the three groups, whereas awaking time and time of response and orientation were longer after thiopental and etomidate than after propofol. Intravenous injection of the three anesthetic agents was followed by a decrease in systolic and diastolic arterial pressure. Heart rate increased after thiopental and etomidate and had only slight fluctuations after propofol. After tracheal intubation there was a significant increase in systolic and diastolic arterial pressure and heart rate in thiopental and etomidate group. These changes were minimal after propofol. The highest number of complications occurred after etomidate.     

Different F-wave recovery after neuromuscular blockade with pancuronium and mivacurium

We performed this study to assess the recovery period after neuromuscular blockade by electromyographic F-wave analysis, a method that supplies more information about more proximal parts of the motor system than conventionally used methods, e.g., mechanomyography (MMG). In 20 neurosurgical ASA physical status I or II patients anesthesia was induced and maintained with IV fentanyl and midazolam. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.25 mg/kg mivacurium (MV group, n = 10) or 0.1 mg/kg pancuronium (PC group, n = 10) intraoperatively. MMG monitoring of the adductor pollicis muscle was performed continuously. F waves were recorded at the abductor pollicis muscle of the contralateral hand at train-of-four (TOF) ratios of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, and 0.95. Recovery of F-wave amplitudes after neuromuscular blockade with pancuronium was significantly slower compared with mivacurium (P = 0.004) during the clinically important recovery period defined by MMG TOF ratios from 0.7 to 0.95. This electrophysiologic finding suggests a differential recovery of the motor system after administration of pancuronium and mivacurium not detected by MMG.     

Sensitivity to atracurium in the lateral abdominal muscles]

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of atracurium on the electromyographic activity of the lateral abdominal muscles and adductor pollicis in anaesthetized subjects. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, open study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2, undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol/fentanyl and orotracheal intubation performed after glottic local anaesthesia without using muscle relaxant. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane/nitrous oxide/oxygen and fentanyl reinjections. Supramaximal percutaneous stimulations in a simple twitch mode (0.1 Hz) were applied at the 9th-10th intercostal nerve on the posterior axillary line and at the ulnar nerve at the wrist. The electromyographic responses were registered using skin surface electrodes, placed on the D9-D10 dermatome in regard of the lateral abdominal muscles and of the thenar muscles. After a single bolus dose of atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1, the following parameters were studied: the maximum effect (Emax), the time for obtaining Emax (Delay) and the recovery time of 5, 10, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of the control neuromuscular response (T5, T10, T25, T50, T75, T100). RESULTS: The dose of 0.5 mg.kg-1 of atracurium induced 100% block in both lateral abdominal muscles and adductor pollicis. Lateral abdominal muscles blockade had faster onset (136 +/- 4 s versus 205 +/- 29 s) and shorter recovery, T5, T10, T25, T50, T75 and T100 were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter than at the adductor pollicis. CONCLUSION: Lateral abdominal muscles blockade have faster onset and recovery than adductor pollicis.     

Phonomyographic measurements of neuromuscular blockade are similar to mechanomyography for hand muscles

PURPOSE: Phonomyography consists of recording low frequency sounds created during muscle contraction. In this study, phonomyography of three regions of the hand was compared to mechanomyography of the adductor pollicis. METHODS: In 12 patients, phonomyography was recorded via small condenser microphones taped over the thenar mass, the hypothenar eminence, and the dorsal groove between the first and second metacarpal bones to record the acoustic signals of adductor pollicis and the hypothenar and first dorsal interosseus muscles, respectively. Mechanomyography of the adductor pollicis was recorded simultaneously using a force transducer. After induction of anesthesia, the ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation every 12 sec. Onset, maximum effect, and offset of neuromuscular block after rocuronium 0.6 mg x kg(-1) were measured using phonomyography and compared to mechanomyography using ANOVA and the Bland-Altman test. RESULTS: Phonomyographic measurements of onset and maximum effect of neuromuscular blockade were not significantly different from mechanomyographic measurements. Phonomyographic measurements of offset (T25%, T75 %, TOF 0.8) of neuromuscular block at the thenar muscles and first dorsal interosseus muscles were not significantly different from mechanomyographic measurements at adductor pollicis; however, T50%, T75% and T90% phonomyographic measurements at the hypothenar muscle were significantly shorter than at any other muscle site. CONCLUSION: There was good agreement between mechanomyographic measurements at the adductor pollicis muscle and phonomyographic measurements at the thenar and the first dorsal interosseus muscles. Phonomyography of those two muscles could be used interchangeably with mechanomyography of adductor pollicis for clinical purposes.     

Anaesthetic induction with alfentanil: comparison with thiopental, midazolam, and etomidate

The speed, side effects and cardiovascular changes associated with anaesthetic induction and endotracheal intubation following alfentanil (20 micrograms/kg/min, IV), thiopental (84 micrograms/kg/min, IV), etomidate (5 micrograms/kg/min, IV) and midazolam (20 micrograms/kg/min, IV) prior to halothane-nitrous oxide general anaesthesia were evaluated and compared in 80 patients undergoing elective general surgical operations. Anaesthetic induction was fastest with etomidate and thiopental (approximately one minute) and slowest with midazolam (about two minutes). Systolic arterial blood pressure (SBP) was decreased at the moment of unconsciousness with thiopental but unchanged with the other compounds. Heart rate (HR) was increased at unconsciousness with midazolam and thiopental but unchanged with etomidate and alfentanil. After intubation HR was increased in all groups except those induced with alfentanil. Arrhythmias were infrequent (5 per cent or less in all groups). Rigidity during induction only occurred with alfentanil (55 per cent) and pain on injection only with etomidate (35 per cent) and alfentanil (5 per cent). Postoperative vomiting was infrequent in all groups (15 per cent) except etomidate (55 per cent). No patient remembered any aspect of laryngoscopy or the operation and all rapidly regained consciousness at the end of operation. The results of this study demonstrate that with the exception of rigidity (which is easily overcome with succinylcholine) and a slightly slower onset of action, alfentanil compares favourably as an induction agent with thiopental and is better than midazolam and etomidate. Alfentanil is superior to all three other induction agents with respect to cardiovascular stability during induction and intubation.     

ORG 9487 Neuromuscular Block at the Adductor Pollicis and the Laryngeal Adductor Muscles in Humans

Background: ORG 9487 is a new steroidal nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with a rapid onset of action. This study was designed to determine the neuromuscular blocking profile of ORG 9487 at the adductor muscles of the larynx and the adductor pollicis.

Methods: In 30 adults, anesthesia was induced with propofol (2-5 mg/kg) and fentanyl (2-3 micro gram/kg). After train-of-four stimulation, the block of the laryngeal adductor muscles was evaluated by measuring the pressure changes in the cuff of the tracheal tube placed between the vocal cords, and the force of the contraction of the adductor pollicis was measured with a force transducer. Patients were randomly allocated to receive ORG 9487 at intravenous bolus doses of 0.75, 1.5 or 2 mg/kg (n = 10 in each group).

Results: Time to peak effect was significantly shorter at the vocal cords than at the adductor pollicis muscle (P < 0.001). Onset time at the vocal cords was 62 +/- 16 s, 62 +/- 13 s, and 52 +/- 14 s (mean +/- SD) after doses of 0.75, 1.5, and 2 mg/kg, respectively (not significant). Onset time at the adductor pollicis muscle was 126 +/- 33 s, 96 +/- 20 s, and 82 +/- 21 s after 0.75, 1.5, and 2 mg/kg doses, respectively (P <0.001). Maximum block was significantly less intense at the vocal cords than at the adductor pollicis muscle (69 +/- 15% vs. 94 +/- 4% after 0.75 mg/kg; 86 +/- 7% vs. 97 +/- 4% after 1.5 mg/kg; and 91 +/- 5% vs. 99 +/- 1% after 2 mg/kg). After 1.5 mg/kg duration to 25%, recovery was 3.7 +/- 2.2 min versus 10.2 +/- 2.5 min at the vocal cords and the adductor pollicis muscle, respectively, and 75% recovery occurred at 9.7 +/- 3.7 min at the vocal cords and at 18.3 +/- 5.2 min at the adductor pollicis muscle.     

Effects of an Intubating Dose of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium on the Larynx and Diaphragm: An Electromyographic Study in Humans

Background: Paralysis of the vocal cords is one objective of using relaxants to facilitate tracheal intubation. This study compares the neuromuscular blocking effect of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx, the diaphragm, and the adductor pollicis muscle.

Methods: Electromyographic response was used to compare the neuromuscular blocking effect of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the laryngeal adductor muscles, the diaphragm, and the adductor pollicis muscle. Sixteen patients undergoing elective surgery were anesthetized with propofol and fentanyl, and their tracheas were intubated without neuromuscular blocking agents. The recurrent laryngeal and phrenic nerves were stimulated at the neck. The electromyographic response was recorded from electrodes placed on the endotracheal tube and intercostally before and after administration of 1 mg/kg succinylcholine or 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium.

Results: The maximum effect was greater at the adductor pollicis (100 and 99%) than at the larynx (96 and 97%) and the diaphragm (94 and 96%) after administration of succinylcholine and rocuronium, respectively (P 相似文献   

Effects of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx and diaphragm: an electromyographic study in humans

BACKGROUND: Paralysis of the vocal cords is one objective of using relaxants to facilitate tracheal intubation. This study compares the neuromuscular blocking effect of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx, the diaphragm, and the adductor pollicis muscle. METHODS: Electromyographic response was used to compare the neuromuscular blocking effect of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the laryngeal adductor muscles, the diaphragm, and the adductor pollicis muscle. Sixteen patients undergoing elective surgery were anesthetized with propofol and fentanyl, and their tracheas were intubated without neuromuscular blocking agents. The recurrent laryngeal and phrenic nerves were stimulated at the neck. The electromyographic response was recorded from electrodes placed on the endotracheal tube and intercostally before and after administration of 1 mg/kg succinylcholine or 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. RESULTS: The maximum effect was greater at the adductor pollicis (100 and 99%) than at the larynx (96 and 97%) and the diaphragm (94 and 96%) after administration of succinylcholine and rocuronium, respectively (P < or = 0.05). Onset time was not different between the larynx (58+/-10 s), the diaphragm (57+/-8 s), and the adductor pollicis (54+/-13 s), after succinylcholine (all mean +/- SD). After rocuronium, onset time was 124+/-39 s at the larynx, 130+/-44 s at the diaphragm, and 115+/-21 s at the adductor pollicis. After succinylcholine administration, time to 90% recovery was 8.3+/-3.2, 7.2+/-3.5, and 9.1+/-3.0 min at the larynx, the diaphragm, and the adductor pollicis, respectively. Time to 90% recovery after rocuronium administration was 34.9+/-7.6, 30.4+/-4.2, and 49.1+/-11.4 min at the larynx, the diaphragm, and the adductor pollicis, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neuromuscular blocking effect of muscle relaxants on the larynx can be measured noninvasively by electromyography. Although the larynx appears to be resistant to muscle relaxants, we could not demonstrate that its onset time differed from that of peripheral muscles.     

Comparison of the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol,thiopental or etomidate

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol, thiopental or etomidate. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in six groups of 12 individuals each. In three groups, fentanyl was given as a bolus dose of 1.5 microg kg(-1), whereas the others received a remifentanil infusion at 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Five minutes later, propofol, thiopental or etomidate were titrated to a state of unresponsiveness. Assessment included the amounts of drug necessary for induction, haemodynamics and the times to apnoea, loss of eyelash reflex, and the release of a water-filled syringe held in the patient's hand. RESULTS: Induction times to loss of the eyelash reflex were significantly shorter in the remifentanil than in the fentanyl groups: with propofol 50.7 +/- 13.6s (mean +/- SD) versus 74.9 +/- 27.0s (P < 0.01), with thiopental 42.9 +/- 16.8s versus 77.2 +/- 27.8s (P < 0.01) and with etomidate 54.7 +/- 17.6s versus 72.3 +/- 24.0s (P < 0.05). The times to respiratory arrest or for the syringe to fall were significantly shorter with remifentanil than with fentanyl for propofol and for thiopental, but not for etomidate. In terms of dosages per kg body weight necessary to achieve unresponsiveness, less propofol (-29%, P < 0.05), thiopental (-25%, P < 0.05) or etomidate (-32%, P < 0.01) was necessary with remifentanil than with fentanyl. Haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation were controlled more effectively with remifentanil. However, within the remifentanil groups, mean arterial pressure significantly decreased during induction: -26% with propofol, -181% with thiopental and -14% with etomidate (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During anaesthetic induction, a remifentanil infusion of 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) over 5 min is a suitable alternative to a 1.5 microg kg(-1) bolus dose of fentanyl: induction times are shorter with reduced amounts of propofol, thiopental or etomidate.