A Randomized Evaluation of the SAPIEN XT Transcatheter Heart Valve System in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Who Are Not Candidates for Surgery

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of the SAPIEN XT versus SAPIEN systems (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) in patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS) who were not candidates for surgery.BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for inoperable patients with severe, symptomatic AS. In the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) IB trial, a reduction in all-cause mortality was observed in patients undergoing TAVR with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve compared with standard therapy, but the SAPIEN valve was associated with adverse periprocedural complications, including vascular complications, major bleeding, and paravalvular regurgitation. The newer, low-profile SAPIEN XT system was developed to reduce these adverse events.MethodsA total of 560 patients were enrolled at 28 sites in the United States from April 2011 to February 2012. Patients were randomized to receive the SAPIEN or SAPIEN XT systems. The primary endpoint was a nonhierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, major stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year in the intention-to-treat population, assessed by noninferiority testing. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, New York Heart Association functional class, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, vascular complications, bleeding, 6-min walk distance, and valve performance (by echocardiography).ResultsBoth overall and major vascular complications were higher at 30 days in patients undergoing TAVR with SAPIEN compared with SAPIEN XT (overall: 22.1% vs. 15.5%; p = 0.04; major: 15.2% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.04). Bleeding requiring blood transfusions was also more frequent with SAPIEN compared with SAPIEN XT (10.6% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.02). At 1-year follow-up, the nonhierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, major stroke, or rehospitalization was similar (37.7% SAPIEN vs. 37.2% SAPIEN XT; noninferiority p value <0.002); no differences in the other major pre-specified endpoints were found.ConclusionsIn inoperable patients with severe, symptomatic AS, the lower-profile SAPIEN XT is noninferior to SAPIEN with fewer vascular complications and a lesser need for blood transfusion. (The PARTNER II Trial: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves; NCT01314313)     

Surgical Sutureless and Transcatheter Aortic Valves: Hemodynamic Performance and Clinical Outcomes in Propensity Score-Matched High-Risk Populations With Severe Aortic Stenosis

ObjectivesIn propensity score–matched patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the 3f Enable sutureless prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the hemodynamic performance of both valves and mid-term survival of patients were evaluated.BackgroundData on hemodynamic performance of surgical sutureless bioprostheses in high operative risk patients with aortic stenosis are scarce.MethodsOf 258 patients undergoing TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement with the 3f Enable valve, 80 (79 ± 5 years of age, 100% men) were included in the current analysis on the basis of propensity score 1:1 matching for baseline clinical and hemodynamic characteristics. All patients had hemodynamic echocardiographic evaluation at baseline and discharge. Mid-term survival was analyzed.ResultsCompared with the 3f Enable valve, TAVR prostheses (Edwards SAPIEN XT [Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California] and CoreValve [Medtronic]) had larger effective orifice area index (1.00 ± 0.30 cm²/m² vs. 0.76 ± 0.22 cm²/m²; p < 0.001), lower pressure gradient (8.14 ± 4.21 mm Hg vs. 10.72 ± 4.01 mm Hg; p = 0.006), less frequent prosthesis-patient mismatch (30.0% vs. 67.5%; p = 0.001), and low flow (46.2% vs. 72.5%; p = 0.02), but more frequent aortic regurgitation (87.5% vs. 20.0%; p < 0.001). The presence of prosthesis-patient mismatch was independently associated with a low-flow state at discharge (odds ratio: 4.70; p = 0.004) and independently associated with the use of the sutureless prosthesis (odds ratio: 3.90; p = 0.02). However, the survival of the 2 groups was comparable after 1.5-year (interquartile range: 0.79 to 2.01 years) follow-up (log-rank test, p = 0.95).ConclusionsTAVR prostheses demonstrated better hemodynamics than the 3f Enable valve but a higher incidence of aortic regurgitation. However, these differences did not influence mid-term survival of patients.     

Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison of the Randomized PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves) Trial With the NRCA (Nonrandomized Continued Access) Registry

ObjectivesThis study sought to determine whether outcomes for transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) differ between the randomized controlled trial (RCT) and the subsequent NRCA (Nonrandomized Continued Access) registry of the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves) trial.BackgroundThe PARTNER RCT demonstrated that TAVR with the Edwards Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) is noninferior to surgery in high-risk patients and superior to standard therapy for inoperable patients.MethodsThe inclusion and exclusion criteria, data collection, monitoring, and core laboratories were the same for the RCT and NRCA registry. Baseline characteristics, procedural results, and 1-year outcomes were compared between patients undergoing TF-TAVR as part of the RCT and as part of the NRCA registry.ResultsIn the RCT, 415 patients underwent TF-TAVR, whereas in the NRCA, 1,023 patients did. At 30 days, death, cardiac death, stroke, and transient ischemic attacks were not different in the NRCA registry than in the RCT. Major vascular complications (8.0% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.0001) and major bleeding (6.8% vs. 15.3%, p < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the NRCA registry. At 1 year, death rates were significantly lower in the NRCA cohort (19.0% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.009) and cardiac death tended to be lower (8.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.12). Stroke or transient ischemic attack (6.2% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.10) and stroke alone (5.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.13) also tended to be lower.ConclusionsThe large NRCA registry demonstrates further improvement in procedural and longer-term outcomes after TF-TAVR when compared with the favorable results from the PARTNER RCT. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894).     

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With the Edwards Sapien System: The Toronto Experience

ObjectivesThis study sought to review the outcomes for the Sapien and Sapien XT valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI).BackgroundPPVI has emerged as a viable alternative to surgery in patients with right ventricular (RV) outflow tract dysfunction. Limited data are available for the Sapien and Sapien XT valves in this setting.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed for all patients to have undergone PPVI using the Edwards Sapien system at a large quaternary center.ResultsTwenty-five patients (70% male, mean age 34 ± 8.9 years) were identified. Primary underlying diagnosis was tetralogy of Fallot (n = 15), Ross procedure (n = 5), and other (n = 5). RV outflow tract characteristics included: biological valve (n = 16) and homograft (n = 9). Technical success was 96%. One patient required elective surgical pulmonary valve replacement for a high residual gradient. Pre-stenting was performed in all cases (52% covered stents). Valve sizes were 23 mm (n = 8), 26 mm (n = 15), and 29 mm (n = 2). Procedural hemodynamics revealed a decrease in the mean RV-to-systemic pressure ratio from 0.64 to 0.36 (p < 0.001) and RV-to-pulmonary artery (PA) gradient from 39 to 9 mm Hg (p < 0.001). No patient had clinically significant pulmonary regurgitation (PR). At a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 2.1 years (range 0.3 to 7.2 years), there were no deaths. One patient required reintervention (no PR evident immediately post-procedure but severe valvular PR at 1 year requiring a valve-in-valve procedure). There were no episodes of endocarditis and no stent fractures. There was preserved valve function during follow-up with no change in RV-to-PA gradient nor PR severity.ConclusionsThe Edwards Sapien system is a viable and durable option for PPVI in this single-center study.     

Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention)

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of radial versus femoral access in women undergoing coronary angiography/intervention.BackgroundThe risk of bleeding and vascular access site complications are higher in women than in men.MethodsIn a pre-specified RIVAL (RadIal Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention) subgroup analysis, we compared outcomes in women (n = 1,861) and men (n = 5,160) randomized to radial versus femoral access.ResultsOverall, women were at higher risk of major vascular complications compared with men (4.7% vs. 1.7%; p < 0.0001). Major vascular complications were significantly reduced with radial access in women (3.1% vs. 6.1%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32 to 0.78; p = 0.002) and in men (0.7% vs. 2.8%; HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.45; p < 0.0001; interaction p = 0.092). Crossover rates were higher with radial compared with femoral access in women (11.1% vs. 1.9%; HR: 5.88; p < 0.0001) and men (6.3% vs. 1.9%; HR: 3.32; p < 0.0001; interaction p = 0.054). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) success rates were similar irrespective of access site (women: HR: 1.05; p = 0.471; men: HR: 1.00; p = 0.888; interaction p = 0.674), with no differences in PCI complications. In multivariable analyses, female sex was an independent predictor of major vascular complications (HR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.76 to 3.25; p < 0.0001). There were consistent findings for women and men, with no difference for the primary composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and non–coronary artery bypass grafting bleeding (women: 3.9% vs. 5.0%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.19; men: 3.54% vs. 3.5%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.75 to −1.34; interaction p = 0.325).ConclusionsWomen undergoing coronary angiography and PCI have a higher risk of vascular access site complications compared with men, and radial access is an effective method to reduce these complications.     

Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access in Patients Undergoing Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess usage patterns of transradial access in rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and associations between vascular access site choice and outcomes.BackgroundTransradial access reduces bleeding and mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Little is known about access site choice and outcomes in patients undergoing rescue PCI after receiving full-dose fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI.MethodsPatients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry’s CathPCI Registry undergoing rescue PCI for STEMI between 2009 and 2013 were studied. Patients were divided on the basis of access site. Patterns of access use and baseline demographics were noted. Unadjusted and propensity-matched analyses were performed comparing in-hospital bleeding, vascular complications, and mortality outcomes among transradial and transfemoral access patients. The falsification endpoint of gastrointestinal bleeding was specified to assess for persistent unmeasured confounding.ResultsTransradial access was used in 14.2% of cases. In propensity-matched analyses, transradial rescue PCI was associated with significantly less bleeding than transfemoral access (odds ratio [OR]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 0.87; p = 0.003), but not mortality (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.25; p = 0.35). Gastrointestinal bleeding was less frequent in the radial group (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.98; p = 0.05).ConclusionsIn a large, “real-world” registry, transradial access was used in a minority of cases and was associated with significantly less bleeding than transfemoral access in patients undergoing rescue PCI. However, given persistent differences in a falsification endpoint, the influence of treatment-selection bias on these results cannot be ruled out. Further studies are needed to determine predictors of bleeding and mortality in this understudied high-risk group.     

A Strategy of Underexpansion and Ad Hoc Post-Dilation of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Patients at Risk of Annular Injury: Favorable Mid-Term Outcomes

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate a strategy of intentional underexpansion of excessively oversized balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in terms of clinical outcomes, valve function, and frame durability at 1 year.BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement requires the selection of an optimally sized THV to ensure paravalvular sealing and fixation without risking annular injury. However, some patients have “borderline” annular dimensions that require choosing between a THV that may be too small or another that may be too large.MethodsWe evaluated 47 patients at risk of annular injury who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with an oversized, but deliberately underexpanded, THV followed by post-dilation if required. Clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and cardiac computed tomography were performed pre-TAVR, post-TAVR, and at 1 year.ResultsDeployment of oversized THVs with modest underfilling of the deployment balloon (<10% by volume) was not associated with significant annular injury. Paravalvular regurgitation was mild or less in 95.7% of patients, with post-dilation required in 10.7%. THV hemodynamic function was excellent and remained stable at 1 year. Computed tomography documented stent frame circularity in 87.5%. Underexpansion was greatest within the intra-annular THV inflow (stent frame area 85.8% of nominal). There was no evidence of stent frame recoil, deformation, or fracture at 1 year.ConclusionsIn carefully selected patients with borderline annulus dimensions and in whom excessive oversizing of a balloon-expandable SAPIEN XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, California) is a concern, a strategy of deliberate underexpansion, with ad hoc post-dilation, if necessary, may reduce the risk of annular injury without compromising valve performance.     

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Self-Expanding CoreValve Prosthesis

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical impact of balloon post-dilation (BPD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota).BackgroundBPD is a widely adopted strategy to reduce the degree of paraprosthetic regurgitation in case of transcatheter heart valve underexpansion. However, controversies still remain regarding its real effectiveness and safety.MethodsThe ClinicalService (a nation-based data repository and medical care project) dataset was analyzed. All patients were dichotomized according to the need for BPD during the index procedure.ResultsAmong 1,376 patients, BPD of the transcatheter heart valve was performed in 272 (19.8%). In 37% of cases, it was unsuccessful at reducing the paravalvular regurgitation to mild or less. No case of valve embolization, new intravalvular regurgitation, coronary occlusion, and aortic root injury occurred during BPD. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of in-hospital all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, neurological events, myocardial infarction, bleeding, conversion to open-chest surgery, and the need for a permanent pacemaker. The need for BPD did not emerge as an independent risk factor for all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81 to 2.19, p = 0.264) and cardiovascular (adjusted HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.74 to 2.97, p = 0.265) mortality at 1 year after the procedure. In addition, BPD did not predispose to higher odds of neurological events during 12 months after TAVR (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.88, p = 0.815).ConclusionsThis large study showed that BPD after TAVR was safe and not associated with increased rates of cerebrovascular events, mortality, myocardial infarction, and aortic root injury.     

Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve: A Single-Center Experience

ObjectivesEvaluation of 30-day outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the novel balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) emphasizing the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria.BackgroundPreliminary data on clinical performance with the S3 THV are promising. However, information regarding 30-day outcome is limited.MethodsA total of 250 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with the S3 THV at our center were enrolled, and outcomes according to VARC-2 criteria were analyzed at 30 days.ResultsThe mean age was 81.0 ± 6.2 years, median logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were 12.1% and 4.4%, respectively. VARC-2–defined device success was achieved in 244 patients (97.6%); moderate paravalvular leakage developed in 5 patients (2.0%). One patient (0.4%) died of a noncardiac cause and 8 patients (3.2%) had a stroke. Life-threatening bleeding and major vascular complications occurred in 12 (4.8%) and 9 (3.6%) of the patients, respectively. From discharge to 30 days, 5 patients (2.0%) were hospitalized due to valve-related symptoms or worsening of heart failure. The VARC-2 composite early safety endpoint was observed in 25 patients (10.0%). Permanent pacemaker implantation rate at 30 days was 15.2%. Myocardial infarction, coronary obstruction requiring intervention, valve-related dysfunction, and endocarditis were not observed.ConclusionsWe found very good 30-day results using the novel S3 THV with a low rate of clinical events according to VARC-2 criteria. The S3 THV is associated with high procedural success and favorable early safety profile. The need for pacemaker implantations appears to be more frequent than with its predecessor.     

Comparison of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Performed in the Catheterization Laboratory (Minimalist Approach) Versus Hybrid Operating Room (Standard Approach): Outcomes and Cost Analysis

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF TAVR) performed in a catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach [MA]) with TF TAVR performed in a hybrid operating room (standard approach [SA]).BackgroundA MA-TF TAVR can be performed without general anesthesia, transesophageal echocardiography, or a surgical hybrid room. The outcomes and cost of MA-TF TAVR compared with those of the SA have not been described.MethodsPatients who underwent elective, percutaneous TF TAVR using the Edwards Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) were studied. Baseline characteristics, outcomes, and hospital costs of MA-TF TAVR and SA-TF TAVR were compared.ResultsA total of 142 patients were studied (MA-TF TAVR, n = 70 and SA-TF TAVR, n = 72). There were no differences in baseline comorbidities (Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, 10.6 ± 4.3 vs. 11.4 ± 5.8; p = 0.35). All procedures in the MA-TF TAVR group were successful; 1 patient was intubated. Three patients in the SA-TF TAVR group had procedure-related death. Procedure room time (150 ± 48 min vs. 218 ± 56 min, p < 0.001), total intensive care unit time (22 h vs. 28 h, p < 0.001), length of stay from procedure to discharge (3 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.001), and cost ($45,485 ± 14,397 vs. $55,377 ± 22,587, p < 0.001) were significantly less in the MA-TF TAVR group. Mortality at 30 days was not significantly different in the MA-TF TAVR group (0 vs. 6%, p = 0.12) and 30-day stroke/transient ischemic attack was similar (4.3% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.35). Moderate or severe paravalvular leak and device success were similar in the MA-TF TAVR and SA-TF TAVR groups (3% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.4 and 90% vs. 88%, p = 0.79, respectively) at 30 days. At a median follow-up of 435 days, there was no significant difference in survival (MA-TF TAVR, 83% vs. SA-TF TAVR, 82%; p = 0.639).ConclusionsMA-TF TAVR can be performed with minimal morbidity and mortality and equivalent effectiveness compared with SA-TF TAVR. The shorter length of stay and lower resource use with MA-TF TAVR significantly lowers hospital costs.     

Incidence and Severity of Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation With Multidetector Computed Tomography Nominal Area Oversizing or Undersizing After Transcatheter Heart Valve Replacement With the Sapien 3: A Comparison With the Sapien XT

ObjectivesThis study sought to compare the influence of the extent of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) area oversizing on the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) between the Sapien 3 and the Sapien XT transcatheter heart valve (THV) to define a new MDCT sizing guideline suitable for the Sapien 3 platform.BackgroundThe inverse relationship of PAR occurrence and oversizing has been demonstrated for the Sapien XT but the incidence of PAR with comparable oversizing with the Sapien 3 is not known.MethodsSixty-one prospectively enrolled patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Sapien 3 THV were compared with 92 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Sapien XT THV. Patients were categorized depending on the degree of MDCT area oversizing percentage: undersizing (below 0%), 0% to 5%, 5% to 10%, and above 10%. The primary endpoint was mild or greater PAR on transthoracic echocardiography.ResultsMild or greater PAR was present in 19.7% of patients (12 of 61) in the Sapien 3 group and in 54.3% of patients (50 of 92) in the Sapien XT group (p < 0.01). The Sapien 3 group, compared with the Sapien XT group, consistently demonstrated significantly lower rates of mild or greater PAR except for oversizing >10% (p for interaction = 0.54). Moderate or severe PAR rates were also lower in the Sapien 3 group than in the Sapien XT group (3.3% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.04). In the Sapien 3 group, a MDCT area oversizing percentage value of ≤4.17% was identified as the optimal cutoff value to discriminate patients with or without mild or greater PAR.ConclusionsOur retrospective analysis suggests that the Sapien 3 THV displays significantly lower rates of PAR than does the Sapien XT THV. A lesser degree of MDCT area oversizing may be employed for this new balloon-expandable THV.     

Incidence,Causes, and Predictors of Early (≤30 Days) and Late Unplanned Hospital Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the incidence, causes, and predictors of unplanned hospital readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundData regarding unplanned hospital readmissions after TAVR in a real-world all-comers population are scarce.MethodsA total of 720 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at 2 centers who survived the procedure, were included. Median follow-up was 23 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 12 to 39 months), available in 99.9% of the initial population. The occurrence, timing, and causes of hospital readmission within the first year post-TAVR were obtained in all cases. Early and late readmissions were defined as those occurring ≤30 days and >30 days to 1 year post-TAVR, respectively.ResultsThere were 506 unplanned readmissions in 316 patients (43.9%) within the first year post-TAVR (median time: 63 days; IQR: 19 to 158 days post-discharge). Of these, early readmission occurred in 105 patients (14.6%), and 118 patients (16.4%) had multiple (≥2) readmissions. Readmissions were due to noncardiac and cardiac causes in 59% and 41% of cases, respectively. Noncardiac readmissions included, in order of decreasing frequency, respiratory, infection, and bleeding events as the main causes, whereas heart failure and arrhythmias accounted for most cardiac readmissions. The predictors of early readmission were periprocedural major bleeding complications (p = 0.001), anemia (p = 0.019), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.042), and the combined presence of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy at hospital discharge (p = 0.014). The predictors of late readmission were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.023), chronic renal failure (p = 0.013), and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.012). Early readmission was an independent predictor of mortality during the follow-up period (hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 2.39, p = 0.043).ConclusionsThe readmission burden after TAVR in an all-comers population was high. Nearly one-fifth of the patients were readmitted early after hospital discharge, increasing the risk of mortality at follow-up. Reasons for readmission were split between noncardiac and cardiac causes, with respiratory causes and heart failure as the main diagnoses in each group, respectively. Whereas early readmissions were mainly related to periprocedural bleeding events, most late readmissions were secondary to baseline patient comorbidities. These results underscore the importance of and provide the basis for implementing specific preventive measures to reduce readmission rates after TAVR.     

3-Year Outcomes of the OLIVE Registry,a Prospective Multicenter Study of Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Prospective,Multi-Center,Three-Year Follow-Up Study on Endovascular Treatment for Infra-Inguinal Vessel in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia

ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the 3-year follow-up results of OLIVE registry patients.BackgroundAlthough favorable 12-month clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) in OLIVE registry patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) from infrainguinal disease have been reported, long-term results after EVT remain unknown.MethodsThis was a prospective multicenter registry study that consecutively enrolled patients who received infrainguinal EVT for CLI. The primary outcome was 3-year amputation-free survival (AFS), whereas secondary outcome measures were 3-year freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE), wound-free survival, and wound recurrence rate. Prognostic predictors for each outcome were also elucidated by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis or the log-rank test.ResultsThe completion rate of 3-year follow-up was 95%. Three-year AFS, freedom from MALE, and wound-free survival rates were 55.2%, 84.0%, and 49.6%, respectively. Wound recurrence out to 3 years was 43.9%. After multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43, p = 0.001), body mass index ≤18.5 (HR: 2.17, p = 0.001), dialysis (HR: 2.91, p < 0.001), and Rutherford 6 (HR: 1.64, p = 0.047) were identified as predictors of 3-year major amputation or death. Statin use (HR: 0.28, p = 0.02), Rutherford 6 (HR: 2.40, p = 0.02), straight-line flow to the foot (HR: 0.27, p = 0.001), and heart failure (HR: 1.96, p = 0.04) were identified as 3-year MALE predictors. Finally, CLI due to isolated below-the-knee lesion was a wound recurrence predictor (HR: 4.28, p ≤ 0.001). Three-year survival, freedom from major amputation, and reintervention rates were 63.0%, 87.9%, and 43.2%.ConclusionsIn CLI patients with infrainguinal lesions, 3-year clinical results of EVT were reasonable despite high reintervention and moderate ulcer recurrence rate. (A Prospective, Multi-Center, Three-Year Follow-Up Study on Endovascular Treatment for Infra-Inguinal Vessel in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia [OLIVE 3-Year Follow-Up Study]; UMIN000014759)     

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Final Kissing Ballooning in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With the 1-Stent Technique: Results From the COBIS II Registry (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry)

ObjectivesThis study investigated the impact of final kissing ballooning (FKB) after main vessel (MV) stenting on outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions after application of the 1-stent technique.BackgroundAlthough FKB has been established as the standard method for bifurcation lesions treated with a 2-stent strategy, its efficacy in a 1-stent approach is highly controversial.MethodsThis study enrolled 1,901 patients with a bifurcation lesion with a side branch diameter ≥2.3 mm, treated solely with the 1-stent technique using a drug-eluting stent from 18 centers in Korea between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2009. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE)—cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. Propensity score-matching analysis was also performed.ResultsFKB was performed in 620 patients and the post minimal lumen diameter of the MV and side branch was larger in the FKB group than in the non-FKB group. During follow-up (median 36 months), the incidence of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46 to 0.99; p = 0.048) was lower in the FKB group than the non-FKB group. After propensity score matching (545 pairs), the FKB group had a lower incidence of MACE (adjusted HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.85; p = 0.01), and target lesion revascularization in the MV (adjusted HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.93; p = 0.03) and both vessels (adjusted HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.90; p = 0.02) than in the non-FKB group.ConclusionsIn coronary bifurcation lesions, we demonstrated that the 1-stent technique with FKB was associated with a favorable long-term clinical outcome, mainly driven by the reduction of target lesion revascularization in the MV or both vessels as a result of an increase in minimal lumen diameter. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry II [COBIS II]: NCT01642992)     

Tricuspid Regurgitation Is Associated With Increased Risk of Mortality in Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis)

ObjectivesThis study sought to examine the impact of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on mortality in patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).BackgroundTR is often observed in patients with LF-LG AS and low LVEF, but its impact on prognosis remains unknown.MethodsA total of 211 patients (73 ± 10 years of age; 77% men) with LF-LG AS (mean gradient <40 mm Hg and indexed aortic valve area [AVA] ≤0.6 cm²/m²) and reduced LVEF (≤40%) were prospectively enrolled in the TOPAS (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study and 125 (59%) of them underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) within 3 months following inclusion. The severity of AS was assessed by the projected AVA (AVA_proj) at normal flow rate (250 ml/s), as previously described and validated. The severity of TR was graded according to current guidelines.ResultsAmong the 211 patients included in the study, 22 (10%) had no TR, 113 (54%) had mild (grade 1), 50 (24%) mild-to-moderate (grade 2), and 26 (12%) moderate-to-severe (grade 3) or severe (grade 4) TR. During a mean follow-up of 2.4 ± 2.2 years, 104 patients (49%) died. Univariable analysis showed that TR ≥2 was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 to 2.71; p = 0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.005). After adjustment for age, sex, coronary artery disease, AVA_proj, LVEF, stroke volume index, right ventricular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, and type of treatment (AVR vs. conservative), the presence of TR ≥2 was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.23; p = 0.02) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.51; p = 0.03). Furthermore, in patients undergoing AVR, TR ≥3 was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality compared with TR = 0/1 (odds ratio [OR]: 7.24, 95% CI: 1.56 to 38.2; p = 0.01) and TR = 2 (OR: 4.70, 95% CI: 1.00 to 25.90; p = 0.05).ConclusionsIn patients with LF-LG AS and reduced LVEF, TR is independently associated with increased risk of cumulative all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality regardless of the type of treatment. In patients undergoing AVR, moderate/severe TR is associated with increased 30-day mortality. Further studies are needed to determine whether TR is a risk marker or a risk factor of mortality and whether concomitant surgical correction of TR at the time of AVR might improve outcomes for this high-risk population.     

Clinical Outcomes and Revascularization Strategies in Patients With Low-Flow,Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis According to the Assigned Treatment Modality

ObjectivesThis study compared clinical outcomes and revascularization strategies among patients presenting with low ejection fraction, low-gradient (LEF-LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) according to the assigned treatment modality.BackgroundThe optimal treatment modality for patients with LEF-LG severe AS and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization is unknown.MethodsOf 1,551 patients, 204 with LEF-LG severe AS (aortic valve area <1.0 cm², ejection fraction <50%, and mean gradient <40 mm Hg) were allocated to medical therapy (MT) (n = 44), surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (n = 52), or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n = 108). CAD complexity was assessed using the SYNTAX score (SS) in 187 of 204 patients (92%). The primary endpoint was mortality at 1 year.ResultsLEF-LG severe AS patients undergoing SAVR were more likely to undergo complete revascularization (17 of 52, 35%) compared with TAVR (8 of 108, 8%) and MT (0 of 44, 0%) patients (p < 0.001). Compared with MT, both SAVR (adjusted hazard ratio [adj HR]: 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07 to 0.38; p < 0.001) and TAVR (adj HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.52; p < 0.001) improved survival at 1 year. In TAVR and SAVR patients, CAD severity was associated with higher rates of cardiovascular death (no CAD: 12.2% vs. low SS [0 to 22], 15.3% vs. high SS [>22], 31.5%; p = 0.037) at 1 year. Compared with no CAD/complete revascularization, TAVR and SAVR patients undergoing incomplete revascularization had significantly higher 1-year cardiovascular death rates (adj HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.07 to 7.36; p = 0.037).ConclusionsAmong LEF-LG severe AS patients, SAVR and TAVR improved survival compared with MT. CAD severity was associated with worse outcomes and incomplete revascularization predicted 1-year cardiovascular mortality among TAVR and SAVR patients.     

Inverse Relationship Between Membranous Septal Length and the Risk of Atrioventricular Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

ObjectivesThis study sought to examine whether imaging of the atrioventricular (AV) membranous septum (MS) by computed tomography (CT) can be used to identify patient-specific anatomic risk of high-degree AV block and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with self-expandable valves.BackgroundMS length represents an anatomic surrogate of the distance between the aortic annulus and the bundle of His and may therefore be inversely related to the risk of conduction system abnormalities after TAVI.MethodsSeventy-three consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis underwent contrast-enhanced CT before TAVI. The aortic annulus, aortic valve, and AV junction were assessed, and MS length was measured in the coronal view.ResultsIn 13 patients (18%), high-degree AV block developed, and 21 patients (29%) received a PPM. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed MS length as the most powerful pre-procedural independent predictor of high-degree AV block (odds ratio [OR]: 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 1.7, p = 0.01) and PPM implantation (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.8, p = 0.002). When taking into account pre- and post-procedural parameters, the difference between MS length and implantation depth emerged as the most powerful independent predictor of high-degree AV block (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.7, p < 0.001), whereas the difference between MS length and implantation depth and calcification in the basal septum were the most powerful independent predictors of PPM implantation (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.7, p < 0.001 and OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.2 to 20.5, p = 0.03; respectively).ConclusionsShort MS, insufficient difference between MS length and implantation depth, and the presence of calcification in the basal septum, factors that may all facilitate mechanical compression of the conduction tissue by the implanted valve, predict conduction abnormalities after TAVI with self-expandable valves. CT assessment of membranous septal anatomy provides unique pre-procedural information about the patient-specific propensity for the risk of AV block.     

Survival of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Compared With Surgical and Conservative Treatment in High-Surgical-Risk Patients

ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to compare survival between transcatheter mitral valve (MV) repair using MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California), MV-surgery, and conservative treatment in high-surgical-risk patients symptomatic with severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR).BackgroundUp to 50% of patients with symptomatic severe MR are denied for surgery due to high perioperative risk. Transcatheter MV repair might be an alternative.MethodsConsecutive patients (n = 139) treated with transcatheter MV repair were included. Comparator surgically (n = 53) and conservatively (n = 59) treated patients were identified retrospectively. Surgical risk was based on the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (log EuroSCORE) or the presence of relevant risk factors, as judged by the heart team.ResultsThe log EuroSCORE was higher in the transcatheter MV repair group (23.9 ± 16.1%) than in the surgically (14.2 ± 8.9%) and conservatively (18.7 ± 13.2%, p < 0.0001) treated patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in surgical patients (43.9 ± 14.4%, p = 0.003), with similar values for the transcatheter MV repair (36.8 ± 15.3%) and conservatively treated (34.5 ± 16.5%) groups. After 1 year of follow-up, the transcatheter MV repair and surgery groups showed similar survival rates (85.8% and 85.2%, respectively), whereas 67.7% of conservatively treated patients survived. The same trend was observed after the second and third years. After weighting for propensity score and controlling for risk factors, both the transcatheter MV repair (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.78, p = 0.006) and surgical (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.88, p = 0.014) groups showed better survival than the conservatively treated group. The transcatheter MV repair and surgical groups did not differ (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.16, p = 0.430).ConclusionsDespite a higher log EuroSCORE, high-surgical-risk patients with symptomatic severe MR treated with transcatheter MV repair show similar survival rates compared with surgically treated patients, with both displaying survival benefit compared with conservative treatment.     

A Registry-Based Randomized Trial Comparing Radial and Femoral Approaches in Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) Trial

ObjectivesThis study sought to determine the effect of radial access on outcomes in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a registry-based randomized trial.BackgroundWomen are at increased risk of bleeding and vascular complications after PCI. The role of radial access in women is unclear.MethodsWomen undergoing cardiac catheterization or PCI were randomized to radial or femoral arterial access. Data from the CathPCI Registry and trial-specific data were merged into a final study database. The primary efficacy endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding or vascular complications requiring intervention. The primary feasibility endpoint was access site crossover. The primary analysis cohort was the subgroup undergoing PCI; sensitivity analyses were conducted in the total randomized population.ResultsThe trial was stopped early for a lower than expected event rate. A total of 1,787 women (691 undergoing PCI) were randomized at 60 sites. There was no significant difference in the primary efficacy endpoint between radial or femoral access among women undergoing PCI (radial 1.2% vs. 2.9% femoral, odds ratio [OR]: 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12 to 1.27); among women undergoing cardiac catheterization or PCI, radial access significantly reduced bleeding and vascular complications (0.6% vs. 1.7%; OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.90). Access site crossover was significantly higher among women assigned to radial access (PCI cohort: 6.1% vs. 1.7%; OR: 3.65; 95% CI: 1.45 to 9.17); total randomized cohort: (6.7% vs. 1.9%; OR: 3.70; 95% CI: 2.14 to 6.40). More women preferred radial access.ConclusionsIn this pragmatic trial, which was terminated early, the radial approach did not significantly reduce bleeding or vascular complications in women undergoing PCI. Access site crossover occurred more often in women assigned to radial access. (SAFE-PCI for Women; NCT01406236)     

Novel Approaches for Preventing or Limiting Events (Naples) III Trial: Randomized Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Patients at Increased Risk of Bleeding Undergoing Transfemoral Elective Coronary Stenting

ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the safety and the efficacy of bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) alone in the subset of patients at increased risk of bleeding undergoing transfemoral elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundBivalirudin, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, determines a significant decrease of in-hospital bleeding following PCI.MethodsThis is a single-center, investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Consecutive biomarker-negative patients at increased bleeding risk undergoing PCI through the femoral approach were randomized to UFH (UFH group; n = 419) or bivalirudin (bivalirudin group; n = 418). The primary endpoint was the rate of in-hospital major bleeding.ResultsThe primary endpoint occurred in 11 patients (2.6%) in the UFH group versus 14 patients (3.3%) in the bivalirudin group (odds ratio: 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.35 to 1.72; p = 0.54). Distribution of access-site and non–access-site bleeding was 18% and 82% in the UFH group versus 50% and 50% in the bivalirudin group (p = 0.10).ConclusionsThe results of this randomized study, carried out at a single institution, suggest that there is no difference in major bleeding rate between bivalirudin and UFH in increased-risk patients undergoing transfemoral PCI. (Novel Approaches in Preventing and Limiting Events III Trial: Bivalirudin in High-Risk Bleeding Patients [NAPLES III]; NCT01465503)