腹膜前修补复发性腹股沟疝16例

我们对 16例腹膜前修补复发性腹股沟疝的手术入路、手术技巧、手术注意事项进行探讨 ,认为该术式对于复发性疝 ,是一个比较理想的手术方式。1　临床资料本组 16例为男性 ,年龄为 2 5～ 6 4岁。腹股沟斜疝 15例 ,股疝 1例。斜疝复发 1次者 8例 ,复发 2次者 5例 ,复发3～ 4次者各 1例。单侧 14例 ,双侧 1例。2　手术操作做一侧修补 ,取单侧腹部横形或弧形切口 ,距内环口上缘约 2 5～ 3ｃｍ ,切口内侧起自腹直肌中间 ,向外延伸 ,切口长约 5～ 7ｃｍ。做双侧修补时 ,做正中横切口。本组两例双侧修补均做正中横切口 ,余 14例做一侧横切口。切开…     

腹膜前疝修补术

经腹膜前间隙进行疝修补的方法统称腹膜前疝修补（preperitoneal herniorrhaphy）,属后入路修补手术（posterior approach repair）,操作上不同于通常的前人路手术,不切开腹股沟管或游离精索,直接进入腹膜前间隙,利用髂耻束和耻骨梳韧带作修补或辅以补片无张力修补。近年来应用范围不断扩大,显现其独特的优越性。现就有关问题探讨如下。     

腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果对比分析

目的 对比分析腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)和腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法 2019年1月～2020年12月我科行腹腔镜下腹股沟疝无张力修补手术的单侧腹股沟疝病人136例,按手术方式的不同分为TAPP组(70例)及TEP组(66例)。比较两组病人的手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间、住院费用、术后24小时疼痛评分(VSA)、术后首次排气时间、术后并发症发生率、术后半年复发情况。结果 TEP组术后首次排气时间、住院费用明显短于或少于TAPP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组病人手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间、术后24小时疼痛评分(VSA)、术后并发症发生率及术后半年复发情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 TAPP与TEP均是治疗腹股沟疝的安全有效术式,均能达到理想的手术效果,但TEP的手术费用更低,术后恢复快,临床可根据术者及病人的实际情况选择合适的手术方式。     

腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术效果观察

目的观察腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的效果。方法随机将98例腹股沟疝患者分为2组,各49例。观察组行腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP),对照组实施Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术。结果观察组手术时间、术中失血量及术后VAS评分、下床时间、住院时间、切口美观满意度评分均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 TAPP和Lichtenstein术均有优点。可根据患者和术者的具体情况,个体化选择手术方式。     

330例开放式腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术

腹膜前修补术重新受到重视是腹股沟疝修补术发展的一个重要趋势，被认为是真正意义上的无张力疝修补术。本文探讨开放式腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的技术要点，并对该术式的近期效果作初步评价。     

腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果分析

目的探讨腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法将106例腹股沟疝患者按照不同术式分为观察组59例(行腹膜前疝修补术),对照组47例(行平片修补术)。比较2组患者的术中状况和术后并发症。结果观察组的手术时间、术后患者下地时间、术后疼痛时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组发生切口积液、使用止痛剂、阴囊水肿和疼痛异物感的发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(x2=20.25,P0.05)。结论与平片修补术相比,腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝,具有手术时间短、恢复快,并发症发生率低等优点。     

腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝效果观察

目的探讨腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果。方法选取2014-01—2017-01间新密市第一人民医院收治的88例成人腹股沟疝患者。根据不同手术方法分为2组,各44例。对照组行开放疝环充填式无张力疝修补术,观察组实施腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术。比较2种术式的疗效。结果 2组均未发生切口感染及阴囊水(血)肿等并发症。观察组手术时间长于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后VAS评分、下床活动时间、住院时间、并发症发生率均少于或短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术比较,腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术具有创伤小、术后疼痛轻、并发症少、恢复快等优势,效果更为理想。     

腹股沟疝修补和Bassini修补术

腹股沟疝手术经历了100余年的历史．目前已成为一种较为成熟的手术。     

腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补腹股沟疝76例

目前无张力疝修补理念在临床上获得广泛认同,我院2010年1月—2011年6月对76例腹股沟区疝患者行腹膜前间隙无张力修补术,总结报道如下。     

腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补和全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的优劣比较

腹股沟疝是外科常见疾病。随着医学的发展,疝修补术从传统张力疝修补,转变到无张力修补,再到腹腔镜修补。腹腔镜疝修补术治疗优势明显,经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)和全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extra-peritoneal,TEP)是目前国内常用的两种修补术式。长期以来,两种术式各有优缺点,本文从TAPP和TEP在治疗原发单侧疝的手术时间、术中及术后并发症、术后疼痛、总住院时长、治疗复发疝及双侧疝的疗效等多方面进行对比,得出成人原发单侧腹股沟疝最好选用TEP。在治疗复发疝时,优先考虑TAPP。在治疗双侧疝时,TAPP和TEP暂时未见明显差异。临床医师在使用腹腔镜治疗腹股沟疝时应选用更熟悉更合理的手术方式。     

Preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia

From 2007 to date, fi ve boys with bladder exstrophy underwent this pre-emptive treatment of inguinal hernia at our institution. None has developed a recurrence after a median (range) follow-up of 29 (5 – 46) months. This approach avoids any manipulation of the inguinal canal, which is an advantage per se, but may be even more important in children with bladder exstrophy given the relatively high risk of hernia recurrence reported [ 1,2 ] . Furthermore, the presence of a pelvic diastasis makes the pelvic dissection of the cord easier than in normal children with a closed pelvic ring. The same procedure can also possibly be performed in children with a congenital inguinal hernia undergoing other procedures that require dissection of the perivesical space, e.g. ureteric re-implantation or ureterocoele repair.     

Preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: Laparoscopic and open approach

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of preperitoneal repair using laparoscopic (TEP) and open (OPM) approach in recurrent inguinal hernia. Methods: We performed a prospective controlled nonrandomized clinical study in 188 patients with 207 recurrent inguinal hernias over a period of 5 years. TEP repair was employed for 86 repairs, and OPM was used in 121 procedures. The main outcome measurements were: recurrence rate, operating time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: There were three recurrences (1.7%). Two in the OPM group (1.8%) and one (1.3%) in the TEP group [P=NS (not significant)]. The TEP procedure was faster than OPM for unilateral repair (40.8 vs 46.3 min) (P<0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the OPM group (23.9%) than the TEP group (13.9%) (P=NS). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the TEP group (1.2 vs 3.9 days) (P<0.001). Conclusions: Preperitoneal approach (open or laparoscopic) seems to be a good option in recurrent inguinal hernia when these procedures are done by experienced surgeons.     

Thovara repair of inguinal hernias

Summary A new procedure for inguinal hernia is described: the Thovara method. This technique is really a modified version of Lichtenstein's tension-free hernioplasty to which is added a Kirschner-like transposition of the spermatic cord. Between 1988 and 1992, 654 Thovara hernioplasties were performed. 95% (621) patients underwent physical examination one year after the operation and 511 (78%) were reexamined five years after surgery. Early recurrences (< 1 year) were noted in five cases (0.8%). In three cases the mesh had to be removed because of infection. In late follow-up (5 years) no recurrences were observed but in five cases (1%) testicular atrophy was present. The Thovara method is a simple and physiological repair, which eliminates recurrence, the bête noire of inguinal herniorrhaphies. However, almost one half of recurrences are discovered five to ten years after the operation and final evaluation of this technique must await randomized controlled trials and comparisons with alternatives.     

Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias

For patients with recurrent inguinal hernia, or bilateral inguinal hernia, or for women, laparoscopic repair offers significant advantages over open techniques with regard to recurrence risk, pain, and recovery. For unilateral first-time hernias, either laparoscopic or open repair with mesh can offer excellent results. The major drawback of laparoscopy is that the technique requires a significant number of cases to master. For surgeons in group practice, it makes sense to have one surgeon in the group perform laparoscopic repairs so that experience can be concentrated. For others, the best technique remains the approach that the surgeon is most comfortable and experienced performing.     

基于膜解剖的开放前入路腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术

目的通过对腹股沟区膜解剖的了解，辨认开放腹膜前入路手术的正确层面，减少术后复发率和并发症。 方法对2006年1月至2018年3月东莞茶山医院450例原发性腹股沟疝患者进行术中观察、组织学分析和术后长期随访。 结果腹股沟管有两个内环（中间环和内环）。进入Bogros间隙的"门户"是腹膜和腹膜前筋膜深层之间，而进入Retzius间隙的层面则是腹横筋膜和腹膜前筋膜浅层之间，这两个不连续的膜层面通过切开腹壁下血管处间隙韧带而贯通为一体的腹膜前间隙。术后随访平均53个月，慢性疼痛发生率和复发率均低于1%。 结论熟悉腹股沟区膜结构的解剖有助于提高开放腹膜前疝修补术的安全性和可靠性，减少手术并发症和复发率。     

Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach

Summary This report describes a laparoscopic procedure for prosthetic repair of inguinal hernias using an extraperitoneal approach. A total of 51 primary direct and indirect hernias were repaired in this series, including 11 recurrent and 12 bilateral hernias. Operative time for this laparoscopic procedure was similar to that of the comparable open surgery and no unusual complications were noted. All patients were discharged the day following surgery and returned to work within 7 days.