A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the mobilizing efficacy of filgrastim, lenograstim and molgramostim following a disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. Mobilization consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 45 cases (44%), and cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide or vinblastine in 22 (21%), followed by randomization to either filgrastim or lenograstim or molgramostim at 5 microg/kg/day. One hundred and three patients were randomized, and 82 (79%) performed apheresis. Forty-four (43%) patients were chemonaive, whereas 59 (57%) were pretreated. A median number of one apheresis per patient (range, 1-3) was performed. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 8.4 x 10(6)/kg in the filgrastim arm versus 5.8 x 10(6)/kg in the lenograstim arm versus 4.0 x 10(6)/kg in the molgramostim arm (P=0.1). A statistically significant difference was observed for the median number of days of growth factor administration in favor of lenograstim (12 days) versus filgrastim (13 days) and molgramostim (14 days) (P<0.0001) and for the subgroup of chemonaive patients (12 days) versus pretreated patients (14 days) (P<0.001). In conclusion, all three growth factors were efficacious in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells with no statistically significant difference between CD34+ cell yield and the different regimens, and the time to apheresis is likely confounded by the different mobilization regimens.     

Reduced dose of lenograstim is as efficacious as standard dose of filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and transplantation: a randomized study in patients undergoing autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation

In vitro studies have demonstrated a 27% increased efficacy of lenograstim over filgrastim. However, equal doses of 10 microg/kg/day of filgrastim and lenograstim have been recommended for mobilization of CD34+ cells without associated chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated whether a 25% reduced dose of lenograstim at 7.5 microg/kg/day is equavalent to 10 microg/kg/day filgrastim for autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and transplantation. A total of 40 consecutive patients were randomized to either filgrastim (n = 20) or lenograstim (n = 20). The two cohorts were similar in regard to disease, sex, body weight, body surface area, conditioning regimens, previous chemotherapy cycles and radiotherapy. Each growth factor was administered for 4 consecutive days. The first PBSC apheresis was done on the 5th day. In the posttransplant period, the same G-CSF was given at 5 microg/kg/day until leukocyte engraftment. Successful mobilization was achieved in 95% of patients. Successful mobilization with the first apheresis, was achieved in 10/20 (50%) patients in the filgrastim group versus 9/20 (46%) patients in the lenograstim group. No significant difference was seen in the median number of CD34+cells mobilized, as well as the median number of apheresis, median volume of apheresis, percentage of CD34+ cells, and CD34+ cell number. Leukocyte and platelet engraftments, the number of days requiring G-CSF and parenteral antibiotics, the number of transfusions were similar in both groups in the posttransplant period. Lenograstim 7.5 microg/kg/day is as efficious as filgrastim 10 microg/kg/day for autologous PBSC mobilization and transplantation.     

Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 x 5 microg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 x 10 microg/kg)

We investigated the schedule dependency of G-CSF (10 microg/kg) alone in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in breast cancer patients. After a median of three cycles (range, 2-6) of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 49 patients with breast cancer (stage II/III, > or = 10+ Ln n = 36; locally advanced/inflammatory n = 8, stage IV (NED) n = 5) underwent PBPC collection after steady-state mobilization either with 1 x 10 microg/kg (n = 27) or with 2 x 5 microg/kg (n = 22) G-CSF daily for 4 consecutive days until completion of apheresis. Apheresis was started on day 5. Priming with 2 x 5 microg/kg resulted in a higher median number of CD34+ cells (5.8 vs 1.9 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.003), MNC (6.6 vs 2.6 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001) and CFU-GM (6.5 vs 1.3 x 10(4)/kg, P = 0.001) in the first apheresis than with 1 x 10 microg/kg. Also the overall number of collected BFU-E was higher in the 2 x 5 microg group (9.2 vs 3.1 x 10(4)/kg; P = 0.01). After high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/thiotepa/mitoxantrone (n = 46) hematopoietic engraftment with leukocyte count > 1.0/nl was reached in both groups after a median of 10 days (range, 8-15) and with platelets count > 50/nl after 12 (range, 9-40) and 13 days (range, 12-41), respectively. A threshold of > 2.5 x 10(6)/kg reinfused CD34+ cells ensured rapid platelet engraftment (12 vs 17 days; P = 0.12). Therefore, the target of collecting > 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells was achieved in 21/27 (80%) patients of the 1 x 10 microg group and in 21/22 (95%) patients of the 2 x 5 microg/kg group with a median of two aphereses (range, 1-4). None in the 10 microg/kg group, but 6/22 (28%) patients in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group required only one apheresis procedure, resulting in fewer apheresis procedures in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group (mean, 1.8 vs 2.3, P = 0.01). These results demonstrate that priming with 10 microg/kg G-CSF alone is well tolerated and effective in mobilizing sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells in breast cancer patients and provide prompt engraftment after CTM high-dose chemotherapy. G-CSF given 5 microg/kg twice daily (2 x 5 microg) leads to a higher harvest of CD34+ cells and required fewer apheresis procedures than when given 10 microg/kg once daily (1 x 10 microg).     

A randomised study of 10 microg/kg/day (single dose) vs 2 x 5 microg/kg/day (split dose) G-CSF as stem cell mobilisation regimen in high-risk breast cancer patients

A randomised trial in breast cancer patients was designed to compare the number of peripheral blood progenitor cells collected after mobilisation with a single dose of 10 microg/kg/day granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (n=14) or a split dose of 5 microg/kg twice daily (n=14). Both groups were well balanced. No significant differences were observed between groups regarding aphereses parameters. The total number of CD34+ cells collected was higher in the split-dose group (mean of 7.1 and median of 7.4 x 10(6)/kg) than in the single-dose group (5.6 and 5.8 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) (P=0.26). The mean of CD34+ cells collected after the first apheresis procedure was 3.9 x 10(6)/kg for the split dose group and 3.1 x 10(6)/kg for the single-dose group (P=0.24). Circulating CD34+ cells before the first apheresis were higher for the split-dose group (mean 79.7 vs 59.2 x 10(6)/l) (P=0.14). All bone pain scores applied were significantly higher for the split-dose group. Our primary end point of improving the mean of total CD34+ cells collected to 2.5 x 10(6)/kg was not achieved with twice-daily G-CSF administration. Further studies evaluating different mobilisation schedules with G-CSF are needed to determine the optimal regimen.     

Low-dose or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with multiple myeloma

Cyclophosphamide (CY) combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to mobilise blood progenitor cells to support high-dose therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The optimal dose of CY in this setting is unknown. We have retrospectively analysed mobilisation efficiency and need for supportive care in 57 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma previously treated with VAD+/-local radiotherapy. The patients were mobilised either with low-dose CY (LD-CY, 1.2-2 g/m(2)) (n=25) or intermediate-dose CY (ID-CY, 4 g/m(2)) (n=32) plus G-CSF. Both regimens proved to be effective in the progenitor cell mobilisation. At least 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells were collected from 88% and 84% of the patients with a single apheresis, respectively. Only one patient in the LD-CY group (4%) failed to mobilise vs none in the ID-CY group. Patients mobilised with LD-CY plus G-CSF had less toxicity: fewer hospital days during the mobilisation and apheresis procedures (5 vs 9 days, P<0.001), lower frequency of fever (20 vs 73%, P<0.001) and less need for supportive care including platelet transfusions (0 vs 24%, P=0.004) and days on parenteral antibiotics (0 vs 4 days, P<0.001). While these regimens seem to be equally effective in terms of progenitor cell mobilisation in newly diagnosed patients with MM, LD-CY+G-CSF is preferential because of more optimal resource utilisation and more favourable toxicity profile.     

Superior mobilisation of haematopoietic progenitor cells with glycosylated G-CSF in male but not female unrelated stem cell donors

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) effectively mobilises haematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood. It is unclear whether the mobilisation of stem cells with lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) or filgrastim (non-glycosylated G-CSF) leads to a higher cell number of collected engraft able progenitor cells. Thus, we investigated harvesting efficiency of the licensed G-CSF preparations in mobilising peripheral stem cells in a randomised study. A total of 501 healthy unrelated donors, including 339 males and 162 females received either lenograstim (n = 261) or filgrastim (n = 240) at 10 microg/kg body weight (BW) per day. Aphaeresis was performed on day 5 and, if necessary, on day 6 of mobilisation. The number of CD34+ cells collected was 11.5% higher in the lenograstim group (7.19 x 10(6) vs. 6.44 x 10(6)/kg BW donor; P < 0.03). Univariate variance analysis revealed that this effect was caused by male donors: more progenitors cells per kg BW of the donor (7.73 x 10(6) vs. 6.88 x 10(6); P < 0.017) and of the recipient (10.1 x 10(6) vs. 8.88 x 10(6), P < 0.029) could be harvested. There was no significant difference in the percentage of donors in whom a second aphaeresis was required (9.6% vs. 11.6%). Lenograstim mobilises progenitor cells into the peripheral blood more effectively in males than filgrastim.     

Low-dose lenograstim is as effective as standard dose in shortening neutrophil engraftment time following myeloablative chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used following myeloablative chemotherapy (high-dose therapy; HDT) and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue (PBPCR) to reduce neutrophil engraftment time. The dose and duration required to gain maximum clinical and economic benefit has not been fully investigated. This double blind placebo-controlled randomised trial was performed to determine whether short course low-dose or standard-dose Lenograstim (L) would influence recovery of haematopoiesis following HDT and PBPCR. Sixty-one patients were randomised between May 1999 and November 2004, to receive standard-dose lenograstim (263 microg/d), low-dose lenograstim (105 microg/d) or placebo injections. These commenced on day +5 following PBPCR and continued until neutrophil engraftment [absolute neutrophil count (ANC)] > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l. Patients received standard supportive care until haemopoietic recovery. Both standard- and low-dose lenograstim resulted in a significantly shorter median time to neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 0.1 x 10(9)/l:10.0 vs. 11.0 d, P = 0.025; ANC > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l:11.0 vs. 14.0 d, P = 0.0002) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in blood product support, antibiotic usage, documented infection, overall survival or relapse-free survival between the groups. Short course low-dose lenograstim is as effective as standard-dose in reducing neutrophil engraftment time following HDT and PBPCR.     

IGEV regimen and a fixed dose of lenograstim: an effective mobilization regimen in pretreated Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

We explored the efficacy of the IGEV regimen (ifosfamide, gemcitabine, vinorelbine and prednisone) combined with a fixed dose of lenograstim (263 mug/day) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in 90 Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. The median total CD34+ cells/mul peak, colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage and white blood cells for all individual collection sets were 85/mul, 12 x 10(4)/kg and 20 700/mul, respectively. An adequate number of CD34+ cells (more than 3 x 10(6) or 6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg depending on whether single or tandem high-dose chemotherapy was used) were collected in 89 out of 90 (98.7%) mobilized patients, whereas the only failure reached 2.3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. The median CD34+ cell collections were 11 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.3-39 x 10(6)/kg) and 10 x 10(6)/kg (range 6-22.0 x 10(6)/kg) with a median of 1 and 2 leukaphereses for patients eligible for single high-dose treatment and for candidates for tandem transplant, respectively. Target yields were reached in 71.43 and 49.09% and additionally in 17.14 and 43.64% of cases after the first and second apheresis procedures, respectively. Hematological and non-hematological side effects were acceptable, and no toxic deaths occurred. Thirty-four patients received a single and 47 received tandem transplantation with rapid engraftment. These results confirm that the IGEV regimen with lenograstim support can be used successfully and safely to mobilize PBSCs.     

Biosimilar G-CSF versus filgrastim and lenograstim in healthy unrelated volunteer hematopoietic stem cell donors

The World Marrow Donor Organization recommends original granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for the mobilization of stem cells in healthy unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors. We report the comparison of a biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio) with two original G-CSFs (filgrastim and lenograstim) in mobilization in unrelated donors. We included data of 313 consecutive donors who were mobilized during the period from October 2014 to March 2016 at the Medical University of Warsaw. The primary endpoints of this study were the efficiency of CD34+ cell mobilization to the circulation and results of the first apheresis. The mean daily dose of G-CSF was 9.1 μg/kg for lenograstim, 9.8 μg/kg for biosimilar filgrastim, and 9.3 μg/kg for filgrastim (p < 0.001). The mean CD34+ cell number per microliter in the blood before the first apheresis was 111 for lenograstim, 119 for biosimilar filgrastim, and 124 for filgrastim (p = 0.354); the mean difference was even less significant when comparing CD34+ number per dose of G-CSF per kilogram (p = 0.787). Target doses of CD34+ cells were reached with one apheresis in 87% donors mobilized with lenograstim and in 93% donors mobilized with original and biosimilar filgrastim (p = 0.005). The mobilized apheresis outcomes (mean number of CD34+ cells/kg of donor collected during the first apheresis) was similar with lenograstim, biosimilar filgrastim, and filgrastim: 6.2 × 10⁶, 7.6 × 10⁶, and 7.3 × 10⁶, respectively, p = 0.06. There was no mobilization failure in any of the donors. Biosimilar G-CSF is as effective in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in unrelated donors as original G-CSFs. Small and clinically irrelevant differences seen in the study can be attributed to differences in G-CSF dose and collection-related factors. Active safety surveillance concurrent to clinical use and reporting to donor outcome registry (e.g., EBMT donor outcome registry or WMDA SEAR/SPEAR) might help to evaluate the possible short- and long-term complications of biosimilar G-CSF.     

Effect of lenograstim (glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) on peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in healthy volunteers

The efficacy and safety of high-dose lenograstim on CD34 positive (CD34+) cell mobilization into peripheral blood were investigated in 18 healthy male volunteers. The volunteers were divided into 3 lenograstim dose groups of 6 subjects each. Lenograstim was administered at a dose of 2, 5, or 10 micrograms/kg/day, b.i.d. by subcutaneous injection for a total of 5 days. The median peak number of CD34+ cells/microliter of blood was 16.3, 53.9, and 96.6 in the 2, 5, and 10 micrograms/kg/day groups, respectively. A positive correlation was observed between the peak CD34+ level and dose of lenograstim (P = 0.002). The percentage of volunteers achieving more than 50 CD34+ cells/microliter of blood was significantly higher in the 10 micrograms/kg/day group (83.3%, P = 0.010) than in the 2 micrograms/kg/day group (0%). On the subject of safety, at least 1 adverse drug reaction (ADR) was observed in each of the volunteers, and a total of 12, 33, and 45 ADRs were observed in the 2, 5, and 10 micrograms/kg/day groups, respectively. A dose-dependent increase in the number of ADRs was also observed, including an elevation of LDH (P < 0.001), bone pain (P < 0.001), and fatigue (P = 0.008). However, no volunteers required symptomatic treatment or discontinuation of lenograstim. We concluded that administration of lenograstim at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg/day for 5 days is highly effective for CD34+ cell mobilization into peripheral blood and tolerable in healthy volunteers.     

Mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells with IVE and G-CSF improves CD34+ cell yields and engraftment in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease.

The transplantation of mobilised peripheral blood stem cells is associated with more rapid engraftment than marrow transplantation. We have previously reported that G-IVE (G-CSF, ifosphamide, VP-16, epirubicin) improves the yield of CD34+ cells mobilised in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders compared with cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 and G-CSF (G/CYCLO). In this study we have extended these observations to a larger series of patients including different lymphoma subtypes. Ninety-seven patients undergoing stem cell mobilisation were studied. Forty-two patients with lymphoproliferative disorders received G-IVE for mobilisation and 55 patients G/CYCLO. The median number of mobilised CD34+cells per leucapheresis was significantly higher for those patients receiving G-IVE: 5.82 x 106/kg (0.19-36) compared with 1.2 x 106/kg (0.04-17), P < 0.001 which resulted in a significantly reduced number of leucapheresis procedures performed in the G-IVE group. When patients were analysed dependent on underlying disease G-IVE mobilised significantly more CD34+cells per leucapheresis for all lymphoma types reaching 8.41 x 10(6)/kg (0.2-32) compared to 1.32 x 10(6)/kg (0. 06-17) for patients with high-grade NHL mobilised with G-IVE and C-GCSF respectively (P = 0.012). For patients with low-grade NHL 3. 12 x 10(6)/kg (0.10-24.39) compared to 1.08 x 10(6)/kg (0.04-9.74) were collected (P = 0.04) and for patients with Hodgkin's disease 3.02 x 10(6)/kg (1.48-36) and 1.04 x 10(6)/kg (0.1-12.3) (P = 0.001). Mobilisation with G-IVE resulted in the achievement of clinically significant CD34+ cell thresholds in a significantly higher proportion of patients compared to cyclophosphamide and G-CSF reaching >2.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in 88% vs 62% (P = 0.004), >5 x 10(6)/kg in 67% vs18% (P = 0.001) and >10 x 10(6)/kg in 31% vs 14.5% (P = 0.05). Furthermore, an analysis of engraftment demonstrated that there was a significant reduction in the time to achieve platelet counts of >20 and >50 x 10(9)/l in patients receiving each incremental dose of CD34+ cells. We conclude that G-IVE mobilizes significantly more CD34+cells than G/CYCLO in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. This effect is consistent in patients with high-grade NHL, low-grade NHL and HD and results in fewer failed stem collections and increased CD34+ cells available for transplantation which results in significantly accelerated platelet engraftment post transplant.     

CD34+ cell dose and hematologic recovery in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (Allo-PBSCT) has been performed as an alternative to bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Here we report poor mobilization with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and engraftment kinetics in Allo-PBSCT. Sixteen patients (aged 6-61 yr, median 34 yr) received allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells from related donors (aged 15-68 yr, median 37 yr) after myeloablative therapy. Nine of the patients had standard-risk disease and 7 had high-risk disease. The donors received G-CSF at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg/day by subcutaneous injection for 4 to 6 days. Peripheral blood stem cells were subsequently collected in 1 to 3 aphereses and infused immediately. All patients received G-CSF after transplantation. Fifteen patients underwent Allo-PBSCT and one underwent Allo-PBSCT plus BMT. The mean number of CD34+ cells infused in the 15 Allo-PBSCT patients was 6.32 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.28-14.20). The outcomes were compared with 9 identically treated patients who underwent Allo-BMT. The median times until engraftment for neutrophils > 500/microliter and platelets > 20,000/microliter were 14 (range 10-17) and 15 (range 11-50) days in the Allo-PBSCT group and 17 (range 13-29) and 20 (range 16-160) days in the Allo-BMT group, respectively (p = 0.0177 and p = 0.003). Three donors were considered to have poor mobilization (< 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg of the recipient); two of them yielded 1.28 and 1.78 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in 3 apheresis procedures. The patients who received cells from these donors showed prompt neutrophil engraftment, but one showed delayed platelet engraftment and another died of grade IV acute GVHD before reaching 20,000 platelets/microliter. An additional bone marrow harvest was necessary from one donor because of poor mobilization(0.17 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg). Thus, Allo-PBSCT results in more rapid engraftment. It will be necessary to clarify the minimum CD34+ cell dose for complete engraftment in a larger series of trials.     

Etoposide (VP-16) plus G-CSF mobilizes different dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone

Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that are critical to the generation of immunologic tumor responses. Myeloid DCs (DC1) express myeloid antigen CD11c; lymphoid DCs (DC2) express CD123(+) and are CD11c(-). Analysis of DC subsets from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collected from normal donors mobilized with G-CSF shows a predominance of DC2 cells. Whether PBPCs mobilization by chemotherapy yields different subsets of DCs has not been studied. We analyzed DC subsets in apheresis products from 44 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation from 6/00 to 5/01. Patients received either G-CSF alone (10 microg/kg per day, n=11) or etoposide (2 g/m(2)) plus G-CSF (n=33) for progenitor cell mobilization. The patients were apheresed for 2-10 days (median 3) to reach a minimum of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Patients receiving G-CSF alone mobilized significantly more total DC2s than did those receiving etoposide plus G-CSF (median 6.2 x 10(6)/kg vs 2.9 x 10(6)/kg, P=0.001). The DC2/DC1 ratio was also significantly different in the two groups, with the G-CSF group having a higher ratio (median 1.2 vs 0.4, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of chemotherapy plus G-CSF yields different mobilized dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone.     

Stem cell mobilisation with 16 microg/kg vs 10 microg/kg of G-CSF for allogeneic transplantation in healthy donors

We compared two doses of recombinant human granulocyte-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stem cell mobilisation in 90 healthy donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a retrospective analysis. Group I (n = 46) received 10 microg/kg G-CSF (filgrastim) given as 5 microg/kg twice daily, and group II (n = 44) received 16 microg/kg, given as 8 microg/kg twice daily with a 12-h interval. The groups were well-balanced for age and body-weight. G-CSF application was performed on an out-patient basis, and leukapheresis was started in all donors on day 5. The most frequent side-effects of G-CSF were grade I/II, bone pain, headache and fatigue in both groups, whereas grade III of bone pain, headache and fatigue occurred in the 2 x 8 microg/kg group only. One serious non-fatal event with non-traumatic spleen rupture occurred in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group. The CD34(+)cell count in the first apheresis of all donors was 5.1 x 10(6)/kg donor weight (range, 1.5-19.3). The CD34(+) cell harvest was higher in the 2 x 8 microg/kg group than in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group (7.1 x 10(6)/kg vs 4.9 x 10(6)/kg; P = 0.09). The target of collecting >5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg donor weight with one apheresis procedure was achieved in 45% of group I and in 61% of group II, respectively. Administering G-CSF at a dosage of 8 microg/kg twice daily leads to a higher CD34(+) cell yield than a dosage of 2 x 5 microg/kg, but is associated with increased toxicity and higher cost.     

Mobilization, harvesting and selection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were mobilized in 130 patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using cyclophosphamide 2 g/m(2) and either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 mcg/kg/day (for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, SPMS) or G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day (for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), Crohn's disease (CD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and other immune-mediated disorders). Mobilization-related mortality was 0.8% (one of 130) secondary to infection. Circulating peripheral blood (PB) CD34(+) cells/microl differed significantly by disease. Collected CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis and overall collection efficiency was significantly better using Spectra apheresis device compared to the Fenwall CS3000 instrument. Patients with SLE and RRMS achieved the lowest and the highest CD34(+) cell yields, respectively. Ex vivo CD34(+) cell selection employing Isolex 300iv2.5 apparatus was significantly more efficient compared to CEPRATE CS device. Circulating PB CD34(+) cells/microl correlated positively with initial CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis and enriched product CD34(+) cells/kg. Mean WBC and platelet engraftment (ANC>0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l) occurred on days 9 and 11, respectively. Infused CD34(+) cell/kg dose showed significant direct correlation with faster white blood cell (WBC) and platelet engraftment. When adjusted for CD34(+) cell/kg dose, patients treated with a myeloablative regimen had significantly slower WBC and platelet recovery compared to non-myeloablative regimens.     

A randomized comparison of once versus twice daily recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation

To evaluate the schedule dependency of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization, we conducted a randomized comparison in 50 healthy donors, with one subcutaneous daily injection of 10 microg/kg G-CSF (n = 25) compared with twice injections daily of 5 microg/kg G-CSF (n = 25). The two groups were well balanced for age, body weight and sex. G-CSF application was performed on an out-patient basis and leukapheresis was started in all donors on day 5. The most frequent side-effects of G-CSF were mild to moderate bone pain (88%), mild headache (72%), mild fatigue (48-60%) and nausea (8%) without differences between the two groups. The CD34(+) cell count in the first apheresis was 5.4 x 10(6)/kg donor weight (range 2.8-13.3) in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group compared with 4.0 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.4-8.8) in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group (P = 0.007). The target of collecting > 3.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg donor weight with one apheresis procedure was achieved in 24/25 (96%) donors in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group and in 17/25 (68%) donors in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group. The target of collecting > 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the first apheresis was achieved in 64% in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group, but in only 36% in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group. The progenitor cell assay for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) was higher in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group than in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group (7.0 vs. 3.5 x 10(5)/kg, P = 0.01; 6.6 vs. 5.0 x 10(5)/kg; P = 0.1). Administering G-CSF (filgrastim) at a dosage of 5 microg/kg twice daily rather than 10 microg/kg once daily is recommended; this leads to a higher CD34(+) cell yield and requires fewer apheresis procedures without increasing toxicity or cost.     

Long-term hematopoietic engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in pediatric patients: effect of the CD34+ cell dose

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the relationship between long-term hematopoietic recovery and the number of CD34+ cells infused in order to determine the optimal dose of CD34+ cells for rapid and stable engraftment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and December 1998, 96 consecutive autologous transplantations were performed in 92 pediatric patients with different malignancies. Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were mobilized by G-CSF alone (12 microg/kg/day s.c., Neupogen((R)); Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif., USA) and collected using a Cobe Spectra blood cell separator (Cobe, Denver, Colo., USA) through a central venous catheter with double lumen. The CD34+ cell contents of apheresis products were assessed by means of flow-cytometric analysis using an Epics Elite flow cytometer (Coulter, USA). RESULTS: The median number of CD34+ cells infused was 3.2 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.17-44.4). The median times for short-term engraftment (neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l) was 9 (range: 7-16) and 13 days (range: 7-91), respectively. The median times for long-term engraftment (platelet count >50 x 10(9)/l and >100 x 10(9)/l) was 21 (range: 10-249) and 45 days (range: 12-288). When the infused CD34+ cell dose was >/=5 x 10(6)/kg (median 7.99, range 5.01-44.4), there was a statistically significant increase in the rate of short- and long-term hematopoietic recovery compared to patients transplanted with a lower number of CD34+ cells (p < 0.0001). The earlier recovery in the high CD34+ cell group resulted in less transfusional support, fewer days on intravenous antibiotics and shorter hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that G-CSF-mobilized PBPC provide rapid short- and long-term hematopoietic engraftment in pediatric patients undergoing autologous transplantation if a CD34+ cell dose >/=5.0 x 10(6)/kg is infused. As this PBPC dose seems to have clinical and potentially economic implications, it should be considered the optimal dose for apheresis.     

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in an elderly patient with myelodysplatic syndrome with myelofibrosis

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (Allo-PBSCT) has in recent years become an alternative to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation because it facilitates rapid hematopoietic reconstitution without an increase in the incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We report on a 61-year-old man with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myelofibrosis who received an allo-PBSCT from his HLA-matched 68-year-old brother. The preparative regimen consisted of busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Cyclosporin A and methotrexate were administered for GVHD prophylaxis. The donor was treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously for 4 consecutive days. A preparation of 4.04 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight was collected in a single apheresis and infused immediately. Engraftment times to a neutrophil count greater than 500/microliter and platelet count greater than 2.0 x 10(4)/microliter were 15 days each. Acute GVHD of grade II developed, but was resolved with methylprednisolone. However, the patient died of thrombotic microangiopathy 97 days after his allo-PBSCT. Administration of G-CSF and apheresis in the donor were feasible and well tolerated. Allo-PBSCT may result in earlier engraftment and be especially beneficial to elderly patients with MDS.     

Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP-16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed or resistant aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD). However, several authors report failure of standard mobilization regimens in 29% to 56% of these patients making the completion of HDCT impossible and as a result, negatively influencing long-term outcome. Thus, effective new regimens for patients failing initial mobilization are needed. Here we report the results of using etoposide as a mobilizing agent in 16 patients with primary resistant or relapsed malignant lymphoma who had failed prior mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) followed by G-CSF. The use of etoposide 500 mg/m2 (days 1-4) + G-CSF resulted in the successful collection of adequate numbers of PBSC with a median harvest of 3.6 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.2-12.6) CD34+ cells in all 16 patients. In 7/16 (44%) patients, the target yield of at least 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells was harvested by a single apheresis and the maximum number of separations for all patients was two. No excessive toxicities appeared, allowing all patients to proceed to myeloablative chemotherapy. In addition, median peak values of circulating CD34+ cells were significantly higher after etoposide as compared to cyclophosphamide (49.2/microl vs 4.7/microl; P = 0.0004). These results indicate that etoposide + G-CSF is a highly effective mobilization regimen in patients who have failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.     

Mobilization and selection of peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors in children with systemic sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Autologous transplant of lymphocyte-depleted peripheral blood stem cells has been proposed for treatment of patients with severe autoimmune disease. However, until now, no data are available on the safety and feasibility of both stem cell collection and selection in pediatric patients with these disorders. We report on three children affected by systemic sclerosis with lung involvement, who received chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize autologous peripheral blood progenitors. DESIGN AND METHODS: The priming regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (CY, 4 g/m(2)) and G-CSF (lenograstim, 10 microg/kg/day starting 2 days after cyclophosphamide administration until stem cell collection). Leukapheresis was performed when WBC and CD34+ cell count were at least 2 x 10(9)/L and 0.03 x 10(9)/L, respectively. In the first patient, positive selection of CD34+ cells was performed through the Ceprate SC stem cell concentrator (CellPro, Bothell, WA, USA). In the remaining 2 children, progenitor cells were also purged with negative selection of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes performed by means of the Isolex 300i device (Baxter). RESULTS: All patients tolerated the priming regimen well and did not present any sign of autoimmune disease exacerbation. Collection was successful in all children and the number of CD34+ cells before selection ranged between 10.7 x 10(6) and 17.6 x 10(6)/kg of patient body weight. The selection of haematopoietic stem cells in the 3 patients resulted in at least 2. 6-log T-cell depletion of the cell content, with a recovery of the initial value of CD34+ cells comprised between 21 and 44%. After, a preparative regimen consisting of CY (200 mg/kg over 4 days) and Campath-1 G in vivo (10 mg/day for 2 consecutive days), patients were transplanted using cryopreserved lymphocyte-depleted progenitor cells. In all cases, a prompt hematopoietic engraftment was observed. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Taken together these data suggest that mobilization, collection and selection of hematopoietic progenitors are safe and feasible in children with autoimmune disease.