In vitro activity of gatifloxacin compared with gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against uropathogens cultured from patients with complicated urinary tract infections

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gatifloxacin were compared with those of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin using an agar dilution method for 400 uropathogens cultured from the urine of urological patients with complicated and/or hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTI). The collection of strains was made up of Enterobacteriaceae (34.5%), enterococci (31.5%), staphylococci (21.2%) and non-fermenting bacteria (12.8%). The antibacterial activity of the three newer fluoroquinolones, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, were similar, but showed some drug specific differences. Gemifloxacin was most active against Escherichia coli, but less so against Proteus mirabilis. In this series all isolates of E. coli were inhibited at a MIC of 0.25 mg/l gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin and by 0.125 mg/l gemifloxacin. The MIC distribution of all fluoroquinolones showed a bimodal distribution for staphylococci, enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The two modes for P. aeruginosa were 1 and 64 mg/l for gemifloxacin and moxifloxacin and 0.5 and 64 mg/l for gatifloxacin. For staphylococci the two modes were 0.125 and 2 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.03 and 4 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.03 and 2 mg/l for moxifloxacin; for enterococci, 0.25 and 16 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.06 and 2 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.25 and 8 mg/l for moxifloxacin. Compared with trovafloxacin the MICs were similar, but the newer fluoroquinolones were more active than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria. Of the newer fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin had the highest rate of renal excretion and could be considered a promising alternative fluoroquinolone agent for the treatment of UTI.     

Urinary bactericidal activity of single doses (250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg) of levofloxacin against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Escherichia coli

Increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones in uropathogens has become a clinical concern. The purpose of this study was to analyse the urinary bactericidal activity (UBA) of levofloxacin against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Escherichia coli. Ten healthy adult subjects (aged 23-60 years) received single doses of levofloxacin (250, 500, 750 and 1000mg) and then blood and urine samples were collected in intervals (0-1.5, 1.5-4, 4-8, 8-12 and 12-24h) over 24h. Both serum and urine concentrations were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Bactericidal titres in urine were determined against E. coli isolates with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 0.125, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64mug/mL for levofloxacin. The mean serum pharmacokinetic parameters for these doses of levofloxacin were similar to previously published values. The mean peak urinary concentrations (0-1.5h) were 210, 347, 620 and 536mug/mL for the 250, 500, 750 and 1000mg dose, respectively. Each dose of levofloxacin exhibited early (0-1.5h time period) bactericidal activity in urine in virtually all subjects against E. coli strains with MICs相似文献   

Urinary bactericidal activity, urinary excretion and plasma concentrations of gatifloxacin (400 mg) versus ciprofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers after a single oral dose

In an open randomised double-crossover study 12 volunteers (six men, six women) received a single oral dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg) or ciprofloxacin (500 mg) to assess urinary bactericidal activity (in eight intervals up to 120 h) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (up to 36 h). Plasma concentrations and urinary excretion were determined by HPLC with fluorescence detection, and urinary bactericidal titers (UBT) by microdilution-method, using antibiotic-free urine of each volunteer. The mean maximum plasma concentration of gatifloxacin was 3.35 mg/l and that of ciprofloxacin 2.12 mg/l. The mean (median) cumulative renal excretion of the parent drug was for gatifloxacin 81 (83)% of the administered dose within 120 h and for ciprofloxacin 43 (45)%. The UBTs, i.e. the highest two-fold dilution (antibiotic-free urine as diluent) of urine still being bactericidal, were determined for an Escherichia coli ATCC reference strain and nine clinical uropathogens with the following MICs (mg/l) for gatifloxacin/ciprofloxacin (microdilution, MHB): E. coli ATCC 25922 (0.008/0.008); E. coli 523 (0.06/0.06); Klebsiella pneumoniae 1058 (0.03/0.016); Proteus mirabilis 524 (0.125/0.016); Pseudomonas aeruginosa 561 (1/0.125); Enterococcus faecalis strains 60 an 55 (0.5/1 and 8/32); Staphylococcus aureus strains 248 and 596 (both 0.03/0.125) and S. saprophyticus Ho94 (0.125/0.25). The median UBTs measured within the first 6h for gatifloxacin were between 1:16 and 1:>or=1024 for the Gram-negative strains including P. aeruginosa and between 1:8 and 1:>or=1024 for the five Gram-positive strains. The median UBTs for ciprofloxacin were between 1:64 and 1:>or=1024 for the Gram-negative strains (incl P. aeruginosa) and between 1:1.5 and 1:768 for the five Gram-positive strains. The UBTs up to 12 < 0.05 h showed no difference (P<0.05 ) for both E. coli strains, but ciprofloxacin was superior to gatifloxacin against Klebsiella, Proteus and Pseudomonas strains and gatifloxacin was superior to ciprofloxacin against all Gram-positive strains. For the UBTs at 12-24 h, gatifloxacin was generally superior to ciprofloxacin, but showed no difference in the Proteus and Pseudomonas strains. The areas under the UBT-time-curve (AUBT) up to 120 h showed statistically significant (P ) differences between both quinolones in favour of gatifloxacin against 8 of 10 strains tested, no difference for P. mirabilis and significantly higher activity of ciprofloxacin against P. aeruginosa. In conclusion, gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin had overall comparable initial urinary bactericidal activity with some differences for specific pathogens, some times in favour of gatifloxacin (Gram-positives) and some times of ciprofloxacin (usually Gram-negatives), suggesting that for empiric therapy a single oral dose of gatifloxacin (400mg) would be clinically equivalent to ciprofloxacin (500 mg) twice daily-in agreement with the results of a clinical study in complicated UTI performed previously [Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents (2004)].     

Which fluoroquinolones are suitable for the treatment of urinary tract infections?

A number of fluoroquinolone agents are now available for clinical use and even more under development. Whether these compounds are equally effective and thus interchangeable in the treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) has to be answered by comparing their antimicrobial activity against uropathogens, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters and outcome of statistically meaningful clinical studies. Whereas almost all fluoroquinolones give equivalent results with short term therapy of acute uncomplicated cystitis in women, for patients with complicated UTI, only those compounds at the appropriate dosage regimen should be chosen for empiric therapy, which would exhibit sufficiently high urinary bactericidal activity against Gram-negative as well as Gram-positive uropathogens. When considering antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties as well as the results of the published clinical studies, a dosage of 500 mg ciprofloxacin twice daily, 500 mg levofloxacin once daily, or 400 mg gatifloxacin once daily may be comparable dosage regimens in the treatment of severe complicated UTI. In the case of ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) and levofloxacin (500 mg twice daily), the dose could even be increased in UTI caused by less susceptible uropathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa.     

Comparative in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. DESIGN: In vitro analysis. SETTING: University research laboratory. INTERVENTION: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for penicillin and five fluoroquinolones by E test for 201 S. pneumoniae isolates. Serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for the following regimens: ciprofloxacin 750 mg orally every 12 hours and 400 mg intravenously every 8 hours; levofloxacin 500 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; trovafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; gatifloxacin 400 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; and clinafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 12 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Free 24-hour areas under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC0-24) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule, and the average AUC0-24:MIC ratio was calculated for each regimen. Differences in ratios among agents were determined by analysis of variance (Scheffe post hoc test, p < 0.05). For intravenous dosing, the average AUC0-24:MIC for gatifloxacin, clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin was 146, 142, 122, 71, and 61, respectively. For both oral and intravenous regimens, gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin ratios were significantly greater than those for trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (p < or = 0.007). Ratios for trovafloxacin were significantly greater than those for levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (p < 0.0001), and levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ratios were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSION: Gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin achieve significantly higher AUC0-24:MIC ratios for S. pneumoniae than trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Large comparative studies are necessary to determine the clinical significance of these findings.     

Inhibitory and bactericidal activities of gemifloxacin and other antimicrobials against Mycoplasma pneumoniae

The MIC of gemifloxacin was compared with that of sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin using 97 clinical isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. MBCs of fluoroquinolones were determined for a subgroup of 12 isolates. Macrolides were the most potent agents with MIC₉₀s for all drugs 0.001 mg/l. The doxycycline MIC₉₀ was 0.5 mg/l. Gemifloxacin MICs ranged from 0.001 to 0.25 mg/l. The gemifloxacin MIC₉₀ (0.125 mg/l) was equivalent to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, was 2-fold lower than sparfloxacin, 8-fold lower than levofloxacin and 32-fold lower than ciprofloxacin. MBCs for gemifloxacin were predominantly within 2–4 times the corresponding MIC values, indicating a bactericidal effect.     

In vitro activity of four fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa determined by the E test

Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trovafloxacin were tested by the E-test against 100 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ciprofloxacin was the most active of the tested agents with 82% of isolates having a MIC 8). Levofloxacin and trovafloxacin had nearly identical potency: 75% and 76% of the isolates were inhibited by 8 for levofloxacin; 0.19->8 for trovafloxacin). Ofloxacin was the least active of the four quinolones, with 43% of the isolates having a MIC >2 mg/l. All isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin were also resistant to the other agents, i.e. resistance to ciprofloxacin predicted resistance to all the quinolones tested in every case. This data demonstrates that fluoroquinolones are active agents against P. aeruginosa. In vitro susceptibility testing, however, is crucial to assess the resistance pattern in any specific location and for each individual agent.     

六种氟喹诺酮对肠球菌的体外抗菌活性及利血平的影响

目的：研究氟喹诺酮类抗菌药物对临床分离肠球菌的体外抗菌活性,以及多重耐药泵抑制剂利血平对抗菌活性的影响.方法：收集临床分离的101株肠球菌（66株粪肠球菌和35株屎肠球菌）,用琼脂稀释法测定应用利血平前后6种氟喹诺酮对菌株的最低抑菌浓度（MIC）.结果：诺氟沙星、环丙沙星、氧氟沙星、左氧氟沙星、加替沙星、莫西沙星对66株粪肠球菌的MIC90依次为256、64、64、16、16、8 mg/L,对35株屎肠球菌的MIC90依次为＞512、512、128、128、32、32 mg/L.应用利血平之后,上述6种药物对粪肠球菌抗菌活性提高（MIC下降2倍或2倍以上）的株数依次为66（100%）、54（81.8%）、4（6.1%）、4（6.1%）、32（48.5%）和3（4.5%）株,对屎肠球菌抗菌活性提高的株数依次为35（100%）、29（82.9%）、1（2.9%）、0（0%）、6（20.7%）和2（5.7%）株.结论：新氟喹诺酮加替沙星、莫西沙星增强了对肠球菌的抗菌活性,利血平能够提高全部或部分被检测肠球菌对诺氟沙星、环丙沙星和加替沙星的敏感性,但仅使少数被检测肠球菌对氧氟沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的敏感性提高.     

New drugs for Gram-positive uropathogens

Complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequent nosocomial infections. The bacterial spectrum encompasses Gram-negative but also Gram-positive pathogens in up to 30-40%. The existing treatment for Gram-positive pathogens is not always optimal. Antimicrobials for the treatment of Gram-positive uropathogens comprise older agents, such as aminopenicillins with or without beta-lactamase inhibitors and vancomycin, as well as newer fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin or gatifloxacin. However, resistant bacteria such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (except vancomycin-resistant) are generally also not susceptible to the fluoroquinolones. Therefore new agents need to be assessed in the treatment of UTI. Daptomycin and linezolid are new antimicrobial agents with good efficacy against Gram-positive uropathogens as shown by their minimal inhibitory concentrations. In a phase II study the urinary bactericidal activity of linezolid versus ciprofloxacin in volunteers showed comparable activity of both drugs against fluoroquinolone susceptible Gram-positive uropathogens, whereas linezolid was also as active against fluoroquinolone resistant ones. The pharmacokinetics and the mode of action of these two antibiotics are discussed together with some clinical data in the context of therapeutic use in patients with complicated UTIs.     

In vitro short-term bactericidal activity and accumulation of NM394, the active metabolite of prulifloxacin,for Staphylococcus aureus,Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison with ciprofloxacin,levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin

The in vitro short-term bactericidal activity and accumulation of NM394, the active metabolite of prulifloxacin, was compared with those of ciprofloxacin (CPFX), levofloxacin (LVFX) and gatifloxacin (GFLX), using Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Of the 4 fluoroquinolones examined, NM394 accumulated to the highest concentration in all three strains. The order of concentration of the fluoroquinolones accumurated in S. aureus 209P JC-1, E. coli NIHJ JC-2 and P. aeruginosa PAO1 were NM394 > CPFX > GFLX > or = LVFX. The accumulation of fluoroquinolones into bacterial cells correlated with their MICs of the drugs for E. coli and P. aeruginosa, whereas there was no correlation between the accumulation and MICs of the drugs for S. aureus. We also studied the reduction of viable cells after addition of each fluoroquinolones to clarify relationship between the short-term bactericidal activity and the accumulation of the quinolones. The short-term bactericidal activity of NM394 against S. aureus 209P JC-1, E. coli NIHJ JC-2 and P. aeruginosa PAO1 were stronger than those of CPFX, LVFX and GFLX when compared at the same concentration. In conclusion, the strong short-term bactericidal activity of NM394 may be attributed to its high accumulation in bacterial cells.     

Concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion and bactericidal activity of levofloxacin (500 mg) versus ciprofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose

In a randomised crossover study, 14 volunteers received a single oral dose of 500 mg levofloxacin or 500 mg ciprofloxacin in order to assess plasma concentrations by high-pressure liquid chromatography (up to 24 h), urinary excretion and urinary bactericidal titres (UBTs) at intervals up to 120 h. The median maximum concentration of levofloxacin in plasma was 6.1 mg/L and that of ciprofloxacin was 2.3 mg/L. The median cumulative level of renal excretion of the administered dose of the parent drug was 81.2% for levofloxacin and 36.2% for ciprofloxacin. UBTs were determined for a reference strain and nine clinical uropathogens. The median UBTs of both quinolones measured within the first 12 h were between 0 and 1:≥1024, correlating with the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the strains. For Gram-negative strains, the UBTs of both quinolones were comparable despite the lower MICs of ciprofloxacin. During further time courses, however, the UBTs of levofloxacin were significantly higher than those of ciprofloxacin. For Gram-positive strains, for which the MICs of levofloxacin were equal to or lower than those of ciprofloxacin, the UBTs of levofloxacin were already significantly higher from the beginning. It can be concluded that overall the doses of the two tested fluoroquinolones may be considered equivalent with regard to treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, although the recommended dosing is twice daily for ciprofloxacin and once daily for levofloxacin.     

In vitro activity of sitafloxacin compared with several fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus constellatus

The in vitro activities of sitafloxacin and seven other fluoroquinolones a (ciprofloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, T-3811ME, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin) were examined by the microdilution method against 79 clinically isolated 'Streptococcus milleri' group (SMG) microorganisms. No statistically significant differences were found between the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC(50) and MIC(90)) against Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus constellatus. Sitafloxacin was the most active agent of the eight fluoroquinolones tested against SMG, with a MIC(90) of 0.06 microg/mL, which was 8 times more active than ciprofloxacin and 16 times more active than levofloxacin. Although none of the SMG strains showed high resistance to any of the fluoroquinolones tested, three agents (trovafloxacin, sitafloxacin and T-3811ME) had low MICs against 23 SMG strains against which levofloxacin had a MIC> 1 microg/mL. In conclusion, several fluoroquinolones have low MICs against SMG, but sitafloxacin has the lowest.     

A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections.

The new fluoroquinolones (clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin) offer excellent activity against Gram-negative bacilli and improved Gram-positive activity (e.g. against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin still maintains the best in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (e.g. Bacteroides fragilis) versus ciprofloxacin. All of the new fluoroquinolones display excellent bioavailability and have longer serum half-lives than ciprofloxacin allowing for once daily dose administration. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones to each other or to standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of community-acquired respiratory infections (e.g. pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis). Limited data suggest that the new fluoroquinolones as a class may lead to better outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis versus comparators. Several of these agents have either been withdrawn from the market, had their use severely restricted because of adverse effects (clinafloxacin because of phototoxicity and hypoglycaemia; grepafloxacin because of prolongation of the QTc and resultant torsades de pointes; sparfloxacin because of phototoxicity; and trovafloxacin because of hepatotoxicity), or were discontinued during developmental phases. The remaining fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin have adverse effect profiles similar to ciprofloxacin. Extensive post-marketing safety surveillance data (as are available with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) are required for all new fluoroquinolones before safety can be definitively established. Drug interactions are limited; however, all fluoroquinolones interact with metal ion containing drugs (eg. antacids). The new fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) offer several advantages over ciprofloxacin and are emerging as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. Their broad spectrum of activity which includes respiratory pathogens such as penicillin and macrolide resistant S. pneumoniae, favourable pharmacokinetic parameters, good bacteriological and clinical efficacy will lead to growing use of these agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis. These agents may result in cost savings especially in situations where, because of their potent broad-spectrum activity and excellent bioavailability, they may be used orally in place of intravenous antibacterials. Prudent use of the new fluoroquinolones will be required to minimise the development of resistance to these agents.     

Efficacy of trovafloxacin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation of an intraabdominal infection.

An in vitro model simulating trovafloxacin concentrations in human serum after standard doses was used to investigate the activity of this drug with time against Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotic concentrations used for each incubation period were: 4.24 mg/l (0-1 h), 3.69 mg/l (1-3 h), 3.25 mg/l (3-6 h), 2.38 mg/l (6-8 h), 1.35 mg/l (8-24 h). A 99.9% initial inoculum reduction (> 3 log10 cfu/ml) was defined as bactericidal activity. Bactericidal activity against these organisms was obtained with trovafloxacin after the first hour of incubation, and similar activity was obtained against B. fragilis, E. faecalis and S. aureus after 3 h, when they were tested individually. When the strains were tested as mixed culture, there was bactericidal activity against E. coli after 1 h incubation and after 3 h for S. aureus. This activity was observed against B. fragilis and E. faecalis after 6 h incubation in the mixed culture assays and after 3 h when organisms were tested individually. Regrowth was not observed over a 24 h period. These data show that trovafloxacin might be effective in intraabdominal infections caused by mixed aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms.     

In vitro activity of older and newer fluoroquinolones against efflux-mediated high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The effect of high-level efflux activity on the MICs of fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae in the absence of topoisomerase mutations leading to fluoroquinolones resistance was investigated. A S. pneumoniae ATCC 46619-derived strain with high-level efflux activity was obtained (SP-25A). Both the parent and obtained strains were tested against efflux substrates acriflavine (Acr) and ethidium bromide (EtBr), and against norfloxacin (NFX), ciprofloxacin (CFX), levofloxacin (LFX), moxifloxacin (MFX), trovafloxacin (TVX) and sitafloxacin (SFX), in presence and absence of the efflux pump inhibitor reserpine. gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE QRDR genes were amplified by PCR and sequenced. MICs of NFX and CFX against SP-25A were 64-fold higher than parent strain MICs (256 mg/L versus 4 mg/L and 64 mg/L versus 1mg/L, respectively). MIC of LFX increased from 1 to 4 mg/L and MICs of MFX, TVX and SFX remained virtually unchanged (0.1-0.2 mg/L). MICs of Acr and EtBr against SP-25A were 8- and 16-fold higher than against parent strains. In both cases, reserpine reverted MICs to the parent strain values (1 and 0.2 mg/L). Only parE showed two mutations leading to a Pro(454) --> Ser and Glu(443) changes, which have previously been shown not to lead to significant fluoroquinolones MIC increases. SP-25A showed a significant increase of MICs of the hydrophilic fluoroquinolones, apparently derived only from efflux activity. Efflux activity, at these high levels, can lead to high-level resistance to older hydrophilic fluoroquinolones, but does affect newer fluoroquinolones such as moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin and sitafloxacin.     

A comparative study of the fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents on the action potential duration in guinea pig ventricular myocardia

We examined the effects of ten fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents, levofloxacin, sitafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin, tosufloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and sparfloxacin, on action potentials recorded from guinea pig ventricular myocardia. Sparfloxacin prolonged action potential duration (APD) by about 8% at 10 microM and 41% at 100 microM. Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin and moxifloxacin also prolonged APD at 100 microM by about 13%, 24% and 25%, respectively. In contrast, levofloxacin, sitafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin and tosufloxacin had little or no APD-prolonging effect at concentrations as high as 100 microM. These findings suggest that there are differences in potency to prolong QT interval among the fluoroquinolones.     

Susceptibility of Canadian isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae to oral antimicrobial agents

We measured the susceptibility of Canadian isolates of three respiratory tract pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae) to several currently approved antimicrobial agents by two different methods. We also measured the susceptibility of isolates to seven fluoroquinolones. Beta-lactamase was produced by 123/566 (21.7%) of H. influenzae isolates compared with 178/200 (89%) of M. catarrhalis isolates. For S. pneumoniae 83/374 (22.2%) isolates were penicillin resistant and of these 2.1% (8/374) showed high level resistance (MIC≥2 mg/l). Regardless of methodology, all fluoroquinolones were highly active against H. influenzae (MIC₉₀ ≤0.031 mg/l) and M. catarrhalis (MIC₉₀ ≤0.064 mg/l) isolates. Susceptibility of H. influenzae to cefuroxime and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid was 99–100% whereas 84–85.5% were susceptible to cefaclor and cefprozil. Azithromycin susceptibility ranged from 82.6 to 99.2% depending on the method. M. catarrhalis isolates were uniformly susceptible to all agents tested except amoxycillin. Cross-resistance in S. pneumoniae to all non-quinolone agents was concurrent with increasing penicillin resistance as shown by increasing MIC₉₀ values. For the fluoroquinolones tested, the rank order of potency based on MIC₉₀ values was as follows: gemifloxacin (0.031–0.063 mg/l), trovafloxacin (0.125 mg/l), moxifloxacin (0.125–0.25 mg/l), grepafloxacin (0.125–0.25 mg/l), gatifloxacin (0.5 mg/l), levofloxacin (1 mg/l) and ciprofloxacin (2 mg/l). Our study confirms either a high or increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistant respiratory pathogens in Canada and also compares the new and old fluoroquinolones and their potential role as therapy for community-acquired infections. The prevalence of β-lactamase positive H. influenzae may have decreased from levels reported in previous studies.     

In vitro activity of linezolid,synercid and telithromycin against genetically defined high level fluoroquinolone-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The in vitro activity of levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, erythromycin, telithromycin, linezolid, synercid and vancomycin was measured against 36 genetically defined, gyrA/grlA double mutant MRSA clinical strains with an MIC to ciprofloxacin > or = 8 mg/l. The three newer fluoroquinolones tested were more active than ciprofloxacin. Resistance rates for levofloxacin and gatifloxacin were high (44.5 and 36.1%, respectively). All the strains were moxifloxacin-susceptible, though most of them had MICs close to the break point. All the strains were intermediate or resistant to erythromycin and most were also resistant to telithromycin. No strains were resistant to linezolid, synercid or vancomycin (MIC(90): 2, 1 and 2 mg/l, respectively).     

Measurement of the bactericidal activity of fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae using the bactericidal index method

Kill curve analysis alone showed trovafloxacin to be more bactericidal than levofloxacin, grepafloxacin and moxifloxacin against four isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, using the bactericidal index (BI) method, levofloxacin was the most bactericidal fluoroquinolone using serum or lung biopsy concentration levels against the ofloxacin-susceptible strains and trovafloxacin was the most bactericidal against the ofloxacin-intermediate strain. None of the fluoroquinolones was bactericidal against the ofloxacin-resistant strain. With BIs using epithelial lining fluid or alveolar macrophage concentration levels, trovafloxacin or grepafloxacin was most bactericidal, respectively. These data illustrate that simple analysis of traditional kill curves may not be adequate in the evaluation of fluoroquinolone bactericidal activity. The results of this study suggest a need for further investigation to assess the role of tissue concentration and bactericidal activity in antimicrobial efficacy.     

In vitro susceptibility of 4903 bacterial isolates to gemifloxacin--an advanced fluoroquinolone

The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against over 4900 bacterial isolates was determined by microbroth dilution with interpretation in accordance with NCCLS guidelines. Susceptibility results were compared with those for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. Gemifloxacin and the other fluoroquinolones were not affected by either beta-lactamase production or penicillin-resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. The MIC90 values for gemifloxacin were: S. pneumoniae 0.063 mg/l; Haemophilus influenzae 0.016 mg/l; Moraxella catarrhalis 0.008 mg/l, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus 0.063 mg/l; methicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes 0.031 mg/l; Enterobacteriaceae 0.031-0.16 mg/l; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4 mg/l; Neisseria meningitidis 0.008 mg/l. The MIC90 for gemifloxacin was lower than those for the other quinolones tested against S. pneumoniae (ciprofloxacin 2-4 mg/l, gatifloxacin 0.5 mg/l, levofloxacin 1-2 mg/l, moxifloxacin 0.25 mg/l). This study confirms the enhanced potent activity of gemifloxacin against Gram-positive pathogens, its broad-spectrum, Gram-negative activity and indicates that gemifloxacin is likely to have an important role in treating patients with Gram-positive and/or Gram-negative infections.