Gallbladder biliary lithotripsy: A new rationale applied to old treatment

Pure endoscopic treatment of combined cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is possible due to the chance to use together both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)approaches.This endotherapy permits to treat biliary stones in the main bile duct by standard ERCP and gallbladder stones by EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy eventually associated to intracorporeal lithotripsy to achieve optimal results.     

Novel peroral direct digital cholangioscopy‐assisted lithotripsy using a monorail technique through the overtube in patients with surgically altered anatomy (with video)

Efficacy of cholangioscopy‐assisted lithotripsy for difficult stones such as huge stones, multiple large stones and an impacted stone in patients with non‐altered anatomy has been reported. Herein, we describe peroral direct digital cholangioscopy (PDCS)‐assisted electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) with a new technique in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Five patients received PDCS‐assisted EHL with the monorail technique due to failed conventional stone extraction. Balloon enteroscope was removed, leaving the stiff guidewire in the bile duct and an overtube with inflated balloons. The cholangioscope was then inserted into the bile duct over the wire through the overtube. After direct visualization of the stone, PDCS‐assisted EHL was carried out. This technique was named the ‘monorail technique’. Complete removal of biliary stones in one session was accomplished in four patients and only one case required two sessions. There was no adverse event in any of the cases. PDCS‐assisted EHL using the monorail technique was effective and safe for difficult biliary stones in patients with surgically altered anatomy.     

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis and intrahepatic bile duct stones pose a significant health hazard, especially in the elderly. The large stone not removable with conventional endoscopic techniques, can be effectively and safely managed with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL). METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of consecutive patients at the Wellesley Central Hospital and St. Michael's Hospital, who underwent peroral endoscopic fragmentation of bile duct stones with EHL under direct cholangioscopic control using a "mother-baby" endoscopic system between October 1990 and March 2002. RESULTS: To date, 111 patients have been analyzed. Of the 111 patients reviewed, 94 patients have had complete records and were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 26.2 months (range 0-80). Prior to EHL, 93 of 94 patients (99%) had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and failed standard stone extraction techniques (mean 1.9 ERCPs/patient, range 0-5). Indications for EHL were large stones (81 patients) or a narrow caliber bile duct below a stone of average size (13 patients). Successful fragmentation (61 complete, 28 partial) was achieved in 89 of 93 patients (96%) (1 patient was excluded from analysis due to a broken endoscope). Fragmentation failures were due to targeting problems (2 patients) and hard stones (2 patients). Seventy-six percent of patients required 1 EHL session, 14% required 2 sessions, and 10% required 3 or more. All patients with successful stone fragmentation required post-EHL balloon or basket extraction of fragments. Complications included: cholangitis and/or jaundice (13 patients); mild hemobilia (1 patient); mild post-ERCP pancreatitis (1 patient); biliary leak (1 patient); and bradycardia (1 patient). There were no deaths related to EHL. Final stone clearance was achieved in 85 of 94 patients (90%). CONCLUSIONS: EHL via peroral endoscopic choledochoscopy is a highly successful and safe technique for use in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis and intrahepatic stones. This study has shown a stone fragmentation rate of 96% (89 of 93 patients), and a final stone clearance rate of 90% (85 of 94 patients).     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of refractory bile duct stones

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Following endoscopic sphincterotomy, 90% of bile duct stones can be removed with a Dormia basket or balloon catheter. The removal can fail in patients with large stones, intrahepatic stones, bile duct strictures or a difficult anatomy. The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in fragmenting and allowing the extraction of bile duct stones that could not be cleared by routine endoscopic means including mechanical lithotripsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to January 2005, we treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 376 patients (133 males and 243 females, median age 71.4 years) with bile duct stones that were not removable following endoscopic sphincterotomy, using the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Lithostar Plus machine built by Siemens Co. of Erlangen, Germany. Stone targeting was performed fluoroscopically following injection of contrast via nasobiliary drain or T-tube in 362 patients and by ultrasonography in eight patients. Residual fragments were cleared at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograhy. Two hundred and ten of the 370 patients treated (56.7%) showed only 1 stone, 57 (15.4%) showed 2, 45 (12.1%) showed 3, 58 (15.6%) showed more than 3 stones. The median diameter of the stones was 21mm (range 7-80mm). RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 334 of the 376 patients who underwent the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy procedure (90.2%). Six patients (1.5%) dropped out of treatment during their first sessions, mainly because of intolerance. Each patient averaged 3.7 treatments (1-12), at an average rate of 3470 shocks per session (1500-5400), at an average energy level of 3.4mJ (1-7). Complications were recorded in 34 patients (9.1%); 22 patients experienced symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia, 4 haemobilia, 2 cholangitis, 3 haematuria, 3 dyspnoea; no deaths were associated with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a safe and effective therapy in those patients in whom endoscopic techniques have failed with a clearing rate of 90.2% of refractory bile duct stones with a low rate of complications.     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for bile duct stones: An Australian experience

Choledocholithiasis requires prompt therapy, particularly if complicated by ascending cholangitis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon and basket extraction clears the bile duct in 90% of patients. Failure is usually associated with large stones, that is, greater than 2 cm. Until recently such patients would have required surgical intervention. In 1986 St Vincent's Hospital installed a Dornier HM3 Lithotriptor to be used for both urinary tract and bile duct calculi. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) to bile duct stones was performed. There were 47 patients (28 female, 19 male) with an average age of 76 years. Twenty-two patients had a single stone with a mean diameter of 2.4 cm and 25 had multiple stones. In two patients the stone was not able to be visualized, so ESWL could not be performed. Complete stone clearance was achieved without further intervention in 13 patients, and in a further 23 after endoscopic extraction of fragments. In five patients only partial duct clearance was achieved. However, this provided palliation and enabled the patient to be discharged. Surgical intervention was required in the remaining four cases. Overall success rate was 80% with a further 11% being palliated with improved biliary drainage. There were no serious adverse effects from ESWL. All patients were discharged from hospital. Mortality at 30 days was 4.7% and at 6 months was 19.4%. One patient succumbed to ascending cholangitis 22 weeks post-ESWL (2.7%). All other deaths were unrelated to ESWL or biliary disease. We conclude that ESWL is a safe and effective treatment for bile duct stones not amenable to endoscopic extraction.     

Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones

AIM: The usual bile duct stone may be removed by means of Dormia basket or balloon catheter, and results are quite good. However, the degree of difficulty is increased when stones are larger. Studies on the subject reported many cases where mechanical lithotripsy is combined with a second technique, e.g. electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), where stones are crushed using baby-mother scope electric shock. The extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or laser lithotripsy also yields an excellent success rate of greater than 90%. However, the equipment for these techniques are very expensive; hence we opted for the simple mechanical lithotripsy and evaluated its performance. METHODS: During the period from August 1996 to December 2002, Mackay Memorial Hospital treated 304 patients suffering from difficult bile duct stones (stone>1.5 cm or stones that could not be removed by the ordinary Dormia basket or balloon catheter). These patients underwent endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) procedure, and stones were removed by means of the Olympus BML-4Q lithotripsy. A follow-up was conducted on the post-treatment conditions and complications of the patients. RESULTS: Out of the 304 patients, bile duct stones were successfully removed from 272 patients, a success rate of about 90%. The procedure failed in 32 patients, for whom surgery was needed. Out of the 272 successfully treated patients, 8 developed cholangitis, 21 developed pancreatitis, and 10 patients had delayed bleeding, and no patient died. Among these 272 successful removal cases, successful bile duct stone removal was achieved after the first lithotripsy in 211 patients, whereas 61 patients underwent multiple sessions of lithotripsy. As for the 61 patients that underwent multiple sessions of mechanical lithotripsy, 6 (9.8%) had post-procedure cholangitis, 12 (19.6%) had pancreatitis, and 9 patients (14.7%) had delayed bleeding. Compared with the 211 patients undergoing a single session of mechanical lithotripsy, 3 (1.4%) had cholangitis, 1 (0.4%) had delayed bleeding, and 7 patients (3.3%) had pancreatitis. Statistical deviation was present in post-procedure cholangitis, delayed bleeding, and pancreatitis of both groups. CONCLUSION: Mechanical bile stone lithotripsy on difficult bile duct stones could produce around 90% successful rate. Moreover, complications are minimal. This finding further confirms the significance of mechanical lithotripsy in the treatment of patients with difficult bile duct stones.     

Extracorporeal piezoelectric and intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy in problematic bile duct calculi

More than 90% of all common bile duct stones are today extracted endoscopically after papillotomy with the Dormia basket in combination with the mechanical lithotripter. For patients with endoscopically unremovable stones, there are now new therapies as an alternative to surgical intervention. Ductal stones can either be fragmented by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or by peroral cholangioscopic guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The remaining fragments can then be easily extracted endoscopically. If the stone cannot be removed by using these new techniques, a palliative endoprosthesis can by implanted. We report on our experiences and results with the extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy and the intracorporeal electrohydraulic therapy in 44 patients with complicated bile duct stones. Applying extracorporeal shock wave therapy, treatment was successful in 75% of the patients with common bile duct stones, intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy was successful in 71%. By combination of both techniques, the calculi could be removed in 84% of those patients where before one of both therapies had failed. Finally, the rate of success in the above mentioned 44 patients was 93%. It could be shown by this investigation that both therapeutic methods complete each other in the treatment of the complicated common bile duct stones.     

Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been used since the mid-1980s to fragment bile duct stones which cannot be removed endoscopically. Early machines required general anaesthesia and immersion in a waterbath. AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of the third generation Storz Modulith SL20 lithotriptor in fragmenting bile duct stones that could not be cleared by mechanical lithotripsy. METHODS: Eighty three patients with retained bile duct stones were treated. All patients received intravenous benzodiazepine sedation and pethidine analgesia. Stones were targeted by fluoroscopy following injection of contrast via a nasobiliary drain or T tube. Residual fragments were cleared at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 69 (83%) patients and in 18 of 24 patients (75%) who required more than one ESWL treatment. Stone clearance was achieved in all nine patients (100%) with intrahepatic stones and also in nine patients (100%) referred following surgical exploration of the bile duct. Complications included six cases of cholangitis and one perinephric haematoma which resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: Using the Storz Modulith, 83% of refractory bile duct calculi were cleared with a low rate of complications. These results confirm that ESWL is an excellent alternative to surgery in those patients in whom endoscopic techniques have failed.     

Clinical application of plasma shock wave lithotripsy in treating impacted stones in the bile duct system

AIM:To verify the safety and efficacy of plasma shockwave lithotripsy (PSWL) in fragmenting impacted stonesin the bile duct system.METHODS:From September 1988 to April 2005,67 pa-tients (26 men and 41 women) with impacted stones un-derwent various biliary operations with tube (or T-tube)drainage.Remnant and impacted stones in the bile ductsystem found by cholangiography after the operationwere fragmented by PSWL and chotedochofiberscopy.Atotal of 201 impacted stones were fragmented by PSWLsetting the voltage at 2.5-3.5 kV,and the energy outputat 2-3 J for each pulse of PSWL.Then the fragmentedstones were extracted by choledochofiberscopy.Thesafety and efficacy of PSWL were observed during andafter the procedure.RESULTS:One hundred and ninety-nine of 201 impact-ed stones (99.0%) in the bile duct system were success-fully fragmented using PSWL and extracted by choledo-chofiberscopy.The stone clearance rate for patients was97% (65/67).Ten patients felt mild pain in the right up-per quadrant of the abdomen,and could tolerate it well.Eleven patients had a small amount of bleeding from themucosa of the bile duct.The bleeding was transient andstopped spontaneously within 2 min of normal saline ir-rigation.There were no significant complications duringand after the procedure.CONCLUSION:PSWL is a safe and effective method forfragmenting impacted stones in the bile duct system.     

Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones

Endoscopic treatment is now recognized worldwide as the first‐line treatment for bile duct stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with basket and/or balloon catheter is generally carried out for stone extraction. However, some stones are refractory to treatment under certain circumstances, necessitating additional/other therapeutic modalities. Large bile duct stones are typically treated by mechanical lithotripsy. However, if this fails, laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) is carried out under the guidance of conventional mother‐baby cholangioscopy. More recently, direct cholangioscopy using an ultrathin gastroscope and the newly developed single‐use cholangioscope system – the SpyGlass direct visualization system – are also used. In addition, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has also been used for stone fragmentation. Such fragmentation techniques are effective in cases with impacted stones, including Mirizzi syndrome. Most recently, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilationhas been introduced as an easy and effective technique for treating large and multiple stones. In cases of altered anatomy, it is often difficult to reach the papilla; in such cases, a percutaneous transhepatic approach, such as EHL or laser lithotripsy under percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy, can be a treatment option. Moreover, enteroscopy has recently been used to reach the papilla. Furthermore, an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided procedure has been attempted most recently. In elderly patients and those with very poor general condition, biliary stenting only is sometimes carried out with or without giving subsequent dissolution agents.     

Successful shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones using ultrasound guidance

Eighteen patients with 41 gallstones in the common bile duct, common hepatic, cystic, and intrahepatic ducts underwent shock-wave lithotripsy using the electrohydraulic Sonolith 3000 lithotripter. Lithotripsy was performed using ultrasound guidance alone under intravenous analgesia/sedation. All patients previously had failed stone extraction via retrograde endoscopy, T-tube, or cholecystostomy., Lithotripsy was performed according to an FDA-approved protocol allowing a maximum of two 2500 shock-wave treatments at a 48 hr interval. Following the final lithotripsy or cholangiographic evidence of stone fragmentation, residual fragments were removed via endoscopic or percutaneous route within 24–72 hr. Ultrasound localization of gallstones was aided by continous infusion of the common bile duct with saline solution. In 15 of the 18 patients, complete fragmentation of the stones was accomplished, two had minimal fragmentation, and one with an encysted stone had no fracturing. No serious complications were encountered. Overall nonsurgical stone-free success rate was 17 of 18 patients, indicating biliary duct stones can be successfully treated using an ultrasound-guided lithotripter and intravenous sedation alone.     

Intracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ISWL) in Bile Ducts under Peroral Endoscopy: Progress and Current Status

Attempting to use ISWL (intracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) for treating large and difficult biliary stones was started in the mid 1970s, approximately 10 years before the introduction of ESWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy). However, in contrast to ESWL, ISWL did not quickly become popular in practise. The main reason for this delayed recognition, undoubtedly, lay in the technical difficulties of the peroral applications until the mid 1980s, when the development of an improved cholangios-cope system and a thin, flexible probe allowed the use of EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy) under direct vision during peroral cholangioscopy. Thanks to recent advances in technology, a powerful pulsed laser has begun to be used for ISWL through a 0.2 mm sized quartz fiber. A laser version of ISWL with such a thin probe is expected to facilitate its use by minimizing the endoscope system. The automatic stone-tissue recognition system which interrupts the laser discharge in case of wall contact is another useful advance in technology which increases the safety and therapeutic efficacy. Whereas laser techniques are still in development, ISWL with a laser will be the first choice technique for treating difficult bile duct stones after failure of mechanical lithotripsy and it also promises to improve its therapeutic efficacy for intrahepatic stones in combination with ESWL. In this article, the recent progresses and results of ISWL treatment were reviewed with a respect to the success of ESWL.     

The role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy combined with endoscopic management of impacted cystic duct stones in patients with high surgical risk

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cholecystoscopic lithotripsy can be an alternative procedure for the treatment of impacted cystic duct stones in patients who are high risk for surgery. Conventional methods, including electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), occasionally fail due to the inability to access or capture the impacted stones in the narrow, spirally long cystic duct. Using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) may be more effective to disintegrate cystic duct stones. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of ESWL in the endoscopic treatment of impacted cystic duct stones in patients with high operative risk. METHODOLOGY: Eleven patients with impacted cystic duct stones who were at high risk for surgery were included in this study. All of them had had a failed initial attempt of percutaneous transhepatic cholecystoscopic lithotripsy (PTCCS-L) followed by percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy. Patients underwent ESWL to disintegrate cystic duct stones with endoscopic removal of fragmented stones. RESULTS: Complete removal of cystic duct stones was achieved in 9 of 11 patients (81.8%). One of the 9 patients (11.1%) was treated solely with ESWL, but the other 8 patients (88.9%) required cholecystoscopic removal of residual fragmented stones after ESWL. Fragmented stones passing through the cystic duct impacted in ampullary region in 3 patients after ESWL. Two patients required transpapillary removal of stones. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stone removal after ESWL for impacted cystic duct stones is a difficult and time-consuming procedure. But, it seems to be a relatively safe alternative to surgery in patients with high surgical risk.     

Piezoelectric lithotripsy in the treatment of symptomatic gallstone patients. A 12-month follow-up

Between January and May 1989, 65 patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones were treated with extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL) and supplementary dissolution therapy with oral bile acids. In 98% of the patients, fragmentation of stones was achieved. On average, each patient received 3.18 treatments. In addition to attacks of colic and asymptomatic changes in laboratory parameters, one hematoma of the gallbladder and one of the liver were observed, together with pancreatitis and cholecystitis in two patients each. During the follow-up period, three patients developed symptomatic bile duct stones. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with papillotomy was performed on four occasions, while one female patient had to undergo urgent cholecystectomy for inflammation of the gallbladder and empyema. Six months after the initial treatment, 36 (55%) patients were free of stones, while the stone-free rate after 12 months was 64.5% (41 of 65). Ninety percent of the patients with a solitary stone less than or equal to 2 cm in diameter became stonefree within a year. Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy is clearly a feasible procedure for the treatment of certain gallstone patients.     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones in cystic duct remnants and Mirizzi syndrome

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of bile duct calculi is established, there are few studies of the value of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct remnant stones and for Mirizzi syndrome. METHODS: Patients who required extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones were identified in a cohort of 239 patients with bile duct stones treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy between January 1989 and December 2001 at a single institution. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. Follow-up information was obtained by telephone contact. OBSERVATIONS: Six women (age range 19-85 years) underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones after failure of endoscopic treatment measures. Three of the patients presented with retained cystic duct remnant calculi (one also had Mirizzi syndrome type I), and 3 presented with Mirizzi syndrome type I. The stones were fragmented successfully by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in all patients; the fragments were extracted endoscopically in 5 patients. Endoscopy plus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was definitive treatment for all patients except one who subsequently underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Gallstones in a cystic duct remnant and in Mirizzi syndrome can be successfully treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in conjunction with endoscopic measures. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is especially useful when surgery is contraindicated.     

How Should Biliary Stones be Managed?

Minimally invasive therapy is currently invaluable for the treatment of biliary stones. Clinicians should be familiar with the various endoscopic modalities that have been evolving. I reviewed the treatment of biliary stones from the common practice to pioneering procedures, and here I also briefly summarize the results of many related studies. Lithotripsy involves procedures that fragment large stones, and they can be roughly classified into two groups: intracorporeal modalities and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Intracorporeal modalities are further divided into mechanical lithotripsy (ML), electrohydraulic lithotripsy, and laser lithotripsy. ESWL can break stones by focusing high-pressure shock-wave energy at a designated target point. Balloon dilation after minimal endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is effective for retrieving large biliary stones without the use of ML. Peroral cholangioscopy provides direct visualization of the bile duct and permits diagnostic procedures or therapeutic interventions. Biliary stenting below an impacted stone is sometimes worth considering as an alternative treatment in elderly patients. This article focuses on specialized issues such as lithotripsy rather than simple EST with stone removal in order to provide important information on state-of-the-art procedures.     

Endoscopic management of bile duct stones

The surgical risk of common duct exploration for the treatment of biliary calculi is considerably higher than that of cholecystectomy. Therefore, introduction of endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1974 was a major advance. It has become the therapy of choice in cholecystectomized patients or in those with an increased operative risk. Endoscopic sphincterotomy has a mortality rate of around 1% and a morbidity rate of 7%. These figures compare favourably with open surgery, especially in old patients. The procedure fails in about 10% of all patients referred for endoscopic removal of their calculi. However, several techniques have been described or are currently under evaluation to overcome these failures: intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy, long-term stenting of the bile duct, or direct application of solvents. Long-term follow-up studies show that between 2% and 20% of successfully managed patients may develop recurrent stones, mainly caused by bile stasis and infection. Patients with a functioning gall-bladder and no concomitant gall-bladder stones probably do not require cholecystectomy after successful endoscopic treatment of their choledochal stones. While endoscopic stone removal has replaced surgery in the elderly frail patients it has no major advantages in the young and fit patients, especially when the gall-bladder is still in situ.     

Endoscopic lithotripsy with peroral direct cholangioscopy using a conventional endoscope

Recently,peroral direct cholangioscopy(PDCS) using an ultra-slim endoscope has come into the spotlight.However,the working channel is too small to use various devices for lithotripsy.We report a case of endoscopic lithotripsy with PDCS using a conventional endoscope as a cholangioscope.Computed tomography scan on an 80-year-old female who was admitted with acute cholangitis showed two large stones in the bile duct.Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was attempted first.However,mechanical lithotripsy failed because the stone was too large for the basket catheter.Finally,electric hydraulic lithotripsy with PDCS using a conventional endoscope was performed allowed the stones to be cleared completely.In conclusion,PDCS using a conventional endoscope can be an alternative solution for endoscopic lithotripsy for patients with large stones in the dilated bile duct.     

Endoscopic treatment of retained bile-duct stones by using a balloon catheter for electrohydraulic lithotripsy without cholangioscopy

BACKGROUND: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy is a highly effective method for fragmenting biliary stones, but direct visual control is required. The efficacy and the safety of electrohydraulic lithotripsy without cholangioscopy by using a balloon catheter were evaluated in patients with bile-duct stones that could not be extracted by using standard techniques. METHODS: Nineteen patients with extrahepatic bile-duct stones that could not be extracted by using conventional endoscopic methods, e.g., mechanical lithotripsy, were selected to undergo electrohydraulic lithotripsy without peroral cholangioscopy. An electrohydraulic lithotripsy probe with a 3.0 F radio-opaque tip was inserted through a balloon catheter. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed under fluoroscopy until the fragmented stone could be captured in a large basket for mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopic removal of the fragments was attempted during the electrohydraulic lithotripsy session. RESULTS: Stones were successfully fragmented in 17 of 19 patients. In 16 patients (84.2%), the bile duct was cleared of all stones. A mean of 1.8 endoscopic sessions was required for complete removal. Additional mechanical lithotripsy was performed in 9 (56.2%) of the 16 patients. Minor complications were noted in 4 patients (2 hemobilia, 1 pancreatitis, 1 cholangitis). There was no 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: For a selected group of patients with bile-duct stones not extractable by using standard techniques, fluoroscopically controlled electrohydraulic lithotripsy with a balloon catheter seems to be an effective method of fragmentation.     

B超引导下经皮穿刺胆道造瘘气压弹道碎石取石治疗肝内外胆管结石患者疗效分析

目的 探讨在B超引导下经皮穿刺胆道造瘘气压弹道碎石取石术治疗肝内外胆管结石患者的疗效,并对影响术后结石复发的因素进行分析。方法 2014年1月~2016年6月我院收治的106例肝内外胆管结石患者,其中57例接受经皮穿刺胆道造瘘气压弹道碎石取石术,另49例接受腹腔镜胆道探查取石术。术后随访2年,采用Logistic回归分析影响术后结石复发的相关因素。结果 胆道造瘘气压弹道碎石取石术治疗患者住院时间、住院费用、术中出血量和手术时间分别为（5.2±1.7） d、（7321.5±528.3） 元、（20.4±4.8） mL和（62.5±14.8） min,显著短于或少于腔镜治疗组【分别为（8.7±2.2） d、（10426.4±1032.5） 元、（25.7±5.1） mL和（71.7±15.3） min,P<0.05】;胆道造瘘气压弹道碎石取石术治疗患者结石完全清除率为84.2%,显著高于腔镜治疗组（67.3%,P<0.05）;胆道造瘘气压弹道碎石取石术治疗患者结石复发率为1.8%,显著低于对照组（20.4%,P<0.05）;Logistic回归分析显示,结石数目、结石直径和手术方式为影响肝内外胆管结石患者术后结石复发的危险因素。结论 采用经皮穿刺胆道造瘘气压弹道碎石取石术治疗肝内外胆管结石经济、安全、有效,值得临床进一步验证。