Results of The Comparative Study of 200 Cases: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Introduction

Obesity has experienced worldwide increase and surgery has become the treatment that has achieved the best results. Several techniques have been described; the most popular are vertical gastrectomy (GV) and the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, mini-gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) has gained popularity due to its simplicity and good results.

Objective

To comparatively evaluate the results of MGB/OAGB with those of RYGB with 1-year follow-up.

Methods

The paper presents a comparative case and control study of 100 patients that underwent MGB/OAGB surgery and another 100 with RYGB surgery, operated between 2008 and 2016. Patients were not submitted to revision surgery and had the following pre-operative variables: age 40.46?±?12.4 vs. 39.43?±?10.33 years; sex 64 and 54 women, 36 and 46 men; BMI 44.8?±?12.06 and 45.29?±?8.82 kg/m²; 50 and 54 cases with comorbidities, respectively, these being non-significant differences.

Results

The surgical time was 69.01?±?4.62 (OAGB) vs. 88.98?±?3.44 min; the time of hospitalization was 2 days, reaching a BMI of 27.7?±?7.85 and 29?±?4.52 kg/m², with an excess weight loss 1 year after surgery of 89.4 vs. 85.9%, respectively. The morbidity rates are 9% for OAGB and 11% for the RYGB. There was a comorbidity resolution of 84.4 and 83.7% respectively, without mortality.

Conclusions

The results show the benefits of both techniques, OAGB being the easiest to perform and with less surgical time.

     

The United States Experience with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass at MBSAQIP-Accredited Centers

Obesity Surgery - One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has emerged as a potentially safe and effective weight-loss procedure. Worldwide, OAGB is the third most commonly performed primary bariatric...     

The First Consensus Statement on One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Using a Modified Delphi Approach

Background

An increasing number of surgeons worldwide are now performing one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB). Lack of a published consensus amongst experts may be hindering progress and affecting outcomes. This paper reports results from the first modified Delphi consensus building exercise on this procedure.

Methods

A committee of 16 recognised opinion-makers in bariatric surgery with special interest in OAGB/MGB was constituted. The committee invited 101 OAGB/MGB experts from 39 countries to vote on 55 statements in areas of controversy or variation associated with this procedure. An agreement amongst ≥?70.0% of the experts was considered to indicate a consensus.

Results

A consensus was achieved for 48 of the 55 proposed statements after two rounds of voting. There was no consensus for seven statements. Remarkably, 100.0% of the experts felt that OAGB/MGB was an “acceptable mainstream surgical option” and 96.0% felt that it could no longer be regarded as a new or experimental procedure. Approximately 96.0 and 91.0% of the experts felt that OAGB/MGB did not increase the risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers, respectively. Approximately 94.0% of the experts felt that the construction of the gastric pouch should start in the horizontal portion of the lesser curvature. There was a consensus of 82, 84, and 85% for routinely supplementing iron, vitamin B₁₂, and vitamin D, respectively.

Conclusion

OAGB/MGB experts achieved consensus on a number of aspects concerning this procedure but several areas of disagreements persist emphasising the need for more studies in the future.

     

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Gastric Bypass Performed in a Cadaver

Natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) offers a new option for abdominal surgery. However, despite the initial interest and enthusiasm for its potential advantages, NOTES has some major drawbacks which include the purposeful injury to an organ that may not be otherwise injured or diseased. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may be a procedure that is suited for NOTES because the stomach wall is breached during the normal course of the operation. We have experimented with a technique for a NOTES gastric bypass in the human. A transvaginal, transgastric gastric bypass (TVTG-GBP) was performed in a human cadaver.     

Comparison of Short-term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited Centers

BackgroundOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is the third most common (4%) primary bariatric procedure worldwide but is seldom performed in the United States and is currently under consideration for endorsement by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Evidence from the United States on safety of OAGB compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is limited.ObjectiveTo compare the short-term safety outcomes of the three primary bariatric procedures.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)-accredited hospitals in the United States and Canada.MethodsUsing the 2015–2019 MBSAQIP database, we compared the safety outcomes of adult patients who underwent primary laparoscopic OAGB, RYGB, and SG. Exclusion criteria included age over 80 years, emergency operation, conversion, and incomplete follow-up. The primary outcome was 30-day overall complication. Secondary outcomes were 30-day surgical and medical complications and hospitalization length.ResultsA total of 341 patients underwent primary OAGB. Using propensity scores, we matched the OAGB cohort 1:1 with two cohorts of similar baseline characteristics who underwent RYGB and SG, respectively. The OAGB cohort had a lower overall complication rate than the RYGB cohort (6.7% versus12.3%, P = .02) and a similar rate to the SG cohort (5.0%, P = .43). The OAGB cohort had a similar rate of surgical complication to the RYGB cohort (5.0% versus 8.5%, P = .1) and a higher rate than the SG group (1.2%, P = .009). The OAGB cohort had a shorter median hospitalization than the RYGB cohort (1 d [interquartile range (IQR) 1–2 d] versus 2 d [IQR 1–2 d], P < .001) and a similar hospitalization length to the SG cohort ([1–2 d], P = .46).ConclusionUsing the largest and the most current U.S. data, this study demonstrated that the short-term safety profile of primary OAGB is acceptable, but future studies should determine the long-term safety.     

Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Hand-Sewn Gastrojejunal Anastomosis

Single-port laparoscopic surgery has undergone significant development over the past 5 years. Single port is used in various procedures, including bariatric surgery. The aim of this paper is to describe a surgical technique for gastric bypass with a transumbilical approach (transumbilical gastric bypass—TUGB) with hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy, in selected patients who may be benefited by a better cosmetic result. The procedure begins with a transumbilical vertical incision. We use the GelPOINT single-port device and a 5-mm assistant trocar in the left flank (in the first two cases, a 2-mm subxiphoid liver retractor was used). A gastric pouch is made and calibrated with a 36-Fr bougie. The gastrojejunal anastomosis is performed by hand-sewing in two layers. A Roux-en-Y with a biliary limb of 50 cm and an alimentary limb of 120 cm is performed with a stapler. Three women were subjected to TUGB. The women were aged 28, 31, and 42 years; they had body mass indexes of 40.3, 33, and 38.2; and the operating times were 150, 200, and 150 min, respectively. The first two women underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and the last woman underwent a RYGB with a resection of the stomach remnant. There were no conversions to open or multitrocar techniques. No complications or deaths occurred. The three patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. The technique described for TUGB is a feasible procedure for surgeons who have previous experience with the transumbilical approach.     

Single Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A First Case Report

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which is based on the dual mechanisms of restriction and mal-absorption, is considered to be one of the gold standard surgeries for treatment of morbid obesity. However, the classic laparoscopic approach requires five to seven incisions for multiple trocar placement. Recently, single incision laparoscopic surgery has been adopted for performing appendectomies, cholecystectomies, sleeve gastrectomies, and adjustable gastric band surgeries. Here, we described the first case of a patient receiving laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass through a single transumbilical incision. The operative time was 170 min. There were no intra-operative complications; the patient did very well postoperatively and was discharged 2 days later. Single incision laparoscopic surgery has been viewed as an alternative to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. When performed via the transumbilical route, it can make the abdominal wound scarless and cosmetically more acceptable.     

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Mid-Term Outcomes and Analysis of Possible Outcome Predictors

Purpose

Revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) for insufficient weight reduction following primary restrictive procedures is still investigated. We report mid-term outcomes and possible outcome predictors.

Materials and Methods

Single-center retrospective comparative study of revisional OAGB outcomes (2015–2018) following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG); silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG) is separately discussed.

Results

In all, 203 patients underwent revisional OAGB following LAGB (n?=?125), SG (n?=?64), and SRVG (n?=?14). Comparing LAGB and SG, body mass index (BMI) at revision were 41.3?±?6.6 and 42?±?11.2 kg/m² (p?=?0.64), reduced to 31.3?±?8.3 and 31.9?±?8.3 (p?=?0.64) at mid-term follow-up, respectively. Excess weight loss (EWL)?>?50% was achieved in?~?50%, with EWL of 79.4?±?20.4% (corresponding total weight loss 38.5?±?10.4%). SRVG patients had comparable outcomes. Resolution rates of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HTN) were 93.3% and 84.6% in LAGB compared with 100% and 100% in SG patients (p?=?0.47 and p?=?0.46), respectively.

In univariable analysis, EWL?>?50% was associated with male gender (p?<?0.001), higher weight (p?<?0.001), and BMI (p?=?0.007) at primary surgery, and higher BMI at revisional OAGB (p?<?0.001). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors for EWL?>?50% were male gender (OR?=?2.8, 95% CI 1.27–6.18; p?=?0.01) and higher BMI at revisional OAGB (OR?=?1.11, 95% CI 1.03–1.19; p?=?0.006).

Conclusion

Revisional OAGB for insufficient restrictive procedures results in excellent weight reduction in nearly 50% of patients, with resolution of T2D and HTN at mid-term follow-up. Male gender and higher BMI at revision were associated with EWL?>?50% following revisional OAGB. Identification of more predictors could aid judicious patient selection.

Graphical abstract

     

Safety and Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Patients with Severe Obesity Aged 65 Years and Above

Purpose

With the global increase in life expectancy and the subsequent impaired quality of life in older obese adults, modalities such as bariatric surgery become crucial to help lose excess weight. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in patients 65 years old and above.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 61 patients with severe obesity aged?≥?65 years through Iran National Obesity Surgery Database. The patients had undergone OAGB and were followed up for 12 to 60 months. The required data was extracted through national database.

Results

Mean age and BMI of the patients were 67.62?±?2.03 years and 46.42?±?5.46 kg/m², respectively. Regarding gender, 90.1% of the participants were female. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay were 41.37?±?13.91 min and 1.16?±?0.61 days, respectively. Five patients (8.19%) required ICU admission. The changes in %TWL after 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 month follow-up was 18.62%, 25.51%, 32.84%, 35.86%, 38.49%, 31.41%, and 29.52%, respectively. The resolution of gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, and hypertension after 24 month was about 100%, 65%, 73.33%, 100%, and 76%, respectively. The postoperative early and late complications were 6.53% and 11.46%, respectively. We did not find significant difference in above results between two age groups of 65–70 and?>?70 years.

Conclusions

OAGB can be a good choice in older obese adults because of its shorter operative time, higher potency, and low complication rate.

Graphical abstract

     

Late Perforation of the Jejuno-Jejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most commonly performed operation for the treatment of morbid obesity in the USA. Complications related to the jejuno-jejunal (J-J) anastomosis include postoperative leak, staple-line bleeding and obstruction. We present 3 cases of perforation at the J-J anastomosis occurring more than 30 days after surgery. 3 morbidly obese patients underwent laparoscopic RYGBP. The side-to-side J-J anastomosis was created with a linear stapler, and the anastomotic defect was closed with a running absorbable suture. All 3 patients had uneventful recoveries, but presented 7 to 8 weeks postoperatively with acute abdominal pain and peritoneal signs. Exploratory laparoscopy in these patients revealed a perforation at the J-J anastomosis. No apparent reason for the perforation was found in 2 patients. These perforations were repaired laparoscopically with absorbable suture. The third patient had an obstruction at the J-J anastomosis from an phytobezoar and required conversion to open technique due to limited pneumoperitoneum. All 3 patients recovered uneventfully. Late perforation of the J-J anastomosis is a very rare complication. Primary laparoscopic repair is a feasible and safe choice of treatment.     

A Prospective Evaluation of Intracorporeal Laparoscopic Small Bowel Anastomosis during Gastric Bypass

Background: We evaluated the safety and feasibility of performing a laparoscopic intracorporeal end-toside small bowel anastomosis using a stapling technique as part of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation (RYGBP). Methods: 80 consecutive patients who underwent RYGBP with laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy were evaluated. Operative time and intraoperative and postoperative complications directly related to the jejunojejunostomy anastomosis were recorded. Results: All 80 laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy procedures were successfully performed without conversion to laparotomy. Mean operative time was longer for the first 40 laparoscopic RYGBP than for the last 40 RYGBP (32±18 min vs 21±14 min, respectively, p<0.05). Intraoperative complications were staple-line bleeding (2 patients) and narrowing of the anastomosis (1 patient). Postoperative complications were four small bowel obstructions: technical narrowing at jejunojejunostomy site (2 patients), angulation of the afferent limb (1 patient), and food impaction at the jejunojejunostomy anastomosis (1 patient). These four patients underwent successful laparoscopic re-exploration and creation of another jejunojejunostomy proximal to the original anastomosis. There were no small bowel anastomotic leaks. The median time to resuming oral diet was 2 days. Conclusions: Laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy as part of the RYGBP operation is a safe and technically feasible procedure. Postoperative small bowel obstruction is a potential complication, which can be prevented by avoiding technical narrowing of the afferent limb.     

Intraoperative Endoscopic Assessment of the Pouch and Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

As an advanced surgical procedure, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is associated with considerable morbidity, especially in the learning curve period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of endoscopy during LRYGB surgery in assessing the gastric pouch and anastomosis for air leak, bleeding, and structure at the beginning of a bariatric surgery program. Patients who underwent LRYGB for morbid obesity between May 2008 and May 2009 were included in this study. After the completion of the anastomosis, an endoscopic examination was carried out. The transection line and anastomosis site were examined for bleeding and patency and inspected for air leak under laparoscopic vision. Thirteen morbidly obese patients (mean body mass index, 48.0 ± 6.8 kg/m²) were evaluated by endoscopic examination during the LRYGB operation. None of the cases had bleeding at the transection line or anastomosis site. In two patients, air leak test was positive and the anastomosis was reinforced with additional sutures. All the patients, including those with positive air leak test, were discharged from the hospital with no leak complications. After a mean follow-up of 9.1 ± 5.5 months, except for the patient who underwent balloon dilatation, no other patient had anastomotic stricture. Intraoperative endoscopy is invaluable in the assessment of bleeding, anastomotic patency, and air leak during LRYGB, and it might be a helpful auxiliary tool to decrease morbidity during the learning curve period. Also, it helps solve intraoperative problems during the surgery so that postoperative complications might be prevented.     

Early Results after Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: EEA vs GIA Stapled Gastrojejunal Anastomosis

Background: Various surgical techniques have been successfully applied to isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Many surgeons rely on stapling devices for the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis. Early follow-up results were compared for two laparoscopic techniques for GJ anastomosis: circular end-to-end (EEA) and linear cutting (GIA) staplers. Methods: Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed of all patients who had undergone stapled GJ anastomosis for isolated RYGBP over a 2-year period. The jejunal limb used for GJ anastomosis was fashioned at 1 cm / unit body mass index (BMI). Patients were grouped by GJ anastomotic technique, EEA or GIA, and the results compared. Results: 61 patients underwent RYGBP (EEA=32; GIA=29), with no differences in preoperative BMI or co-morbidities. Mean (±SD) operative time was shorter for the GIA group (EEA=180±56.1 minutes; GIA=145.3±27.9 minutes, P=0.003). There were 2 early re-operations in the GIA group for anastomotic leaks. Postoperative complications were not statistically different; however, there was an increased incidence of wound infections in the EEA group vs the GIA group (21.9% vs 6.9%, P=0.08). Follow-up at 6-8 months revealed an average percent excess weight loss of 46.7%±12.2% for EEA and 51.4%±10.7% for GIA (P=0.25). Length of stay, total hospital costs and operating-room costs were similar (P=0.34, 0.53 and 0.96 respectively). Conclusion: Operative time was significantly shorter in the GIA group. Complications, length of stay, weight loss and costs were similar between the groups. Selection of anastomotic technique may be based on surgeon preference, operative time, and potential for serious complications.     

Laparoscopic Pouch Resizing and Redo of Gastro-jejunal Anastomosis for Pouch Dilatation following Gastric Bypass

Background: With a dramatically increasing number of bariatric operations performed world-wide in the recent years, more late complications have been noticed. Proximal gastric pouch dilatation is a known late complication after laparoscopic or open restrictive surgery for morbid obesity. In the present paper, we report our experience with laparoscopic re-operation of enlarged gastric pouches after laparoscopic gastric bypass, with emphasis on technique and outcome. Methods: Data were retrieved from a prospective database of 334 patients who underwent a laparoscopic gastric bypass operation at the University Hospital of Zurich from July 2000 to December 2004. Five laparoscopic revisions for pouch dilatation after primary bypass were performed. Results: 3 female and 2 male patients with median age 40 years (range 32-55) underwent a laparoscopic pouch resizing. At the time of the re-operation, the median BMI was 32.0 kg/m² (range 28.4-48.4). All procedures were performed laparoscopically with no conversion to open surgery. The median operating-time was 110 minutes (95-120). The median hospital stay was 6 days (range 5-14). The median BMI in the follow-up of 12 months (9-14) was 28.0 kg/m² (25.5-45.8). Diabetes mellitus improved in 4 cases during follow-up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic pouch resizing with redo of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis was feasible, safe and effective in this small series. It led to further weight loss and improved symptoms of poor pouch emptying.     

Revisional Surgery After One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: an Italian Multi-institutional Survey

Obesity Surgery - Efficacy and safety of OAGB/MGB (one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass) have been well documented both as primary and as revisional procedures. However, even after OAGB/MGB,...