Double Atrial Responses to a Single Ventricular Impulse in Long RP' Tachycardia

Double atrial responses (DARs) to a single ventricular impulse have been described in patients with long RP' tachycardia. To define the determinants for the occurrence of DARs. 8 cases with long RP' tachycardia were examined. The mechanism of long RP' tachycardia was the orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) involving a slow conducting concealed accessory pathway in 4 cases and uncommon (fast-slow) type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in the other 4 cases. Programmed and rapid ventricular pacing was performed during sinus rhythm and also rapid ventricular pacing during tachycardia (i.e., entrainment). The retrograde effective refractory period (ERP) and the retrograde maximal 1:1 conduction rate of the fast and slow conducting pathways were examined. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVRT, DARs were observed during programmed and rapid ventricular pacing, performed during sinus rhythm and also during entrainment. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVNRT, DARs were observed only during entrainment. The determinants of DARs in cases with long RP' tachycardia were: (1) presence of two different retrogradely conducting pathways; (2) short ERP of the retrograde fast and slow conducting pathways and a short minimal pacing cycle length at which 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction occurs via these pathways; (3) crucial conduction delay in the slow conducting pathway: and (4) preexisting antegrade unidirectional block in the slow conducting pathway or the antegrade block in the slow conducting pathway produced by collision with a previous retrograde impulse during entrainment.     

房室结双径路消融中特殊电生理现象分析与处理

目的 :分析房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)慢径路消融中特殊电生理现象及处理体会。方法 :慢径路消融前常规行心内电生理检查。结果 :有特殊电生理现象者 8例 ,其中 3例患者AVNRT开始时表现为房室 2 :1传导 ,阻滞点在希氏束以上部位 ;3例患者房室结功能曲线呈连续性 ;1例为慢 -慢型AVNRT ;1例心内电生理检查未能诱发出AVNRT。所有患者慢径消融均成功。结论 :术前应行详细的心内电生理检查和仔细鉴别 ,其消融方法与典型AVNRT相同     

"V-H-A Pattern" as a criterion for the differential diagnosis of atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia from AV reciprocating tachycardia

BACKGROUND: During ventricular extrastimulation, His bundle potential (H) following ventricular (V) and followed by atrial potentials (A), i.e., V-H-A, is observed in the His bundle electrogram when ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction occurs via the normal conduction system. We examined the diagnostic value of V-H-A for atypical form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), which showed the earliest atrial activation site at the posterior paraseptal region during the tachycardia. METHODS: We prospectively examined the response of VA conduction to ventricular extrastimulation during basic drive pacing performed during sinus rhythm in 16 patients with atypical AVNRT masquerading atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) utilizing a posterior paraseptal accessory pathway and 21 with AVRT utilizing a posterior paraseptal accessory pathway. Long RP' tachycardia with RP'/RR > 0.5 was excluded. The incidences of V-H-A and dual AV nodal physiology (DP) were compared between atypical AVNRT and AVRT. RESULTS: V-H-A was demonstrated in all the 16 patients (100%) in atypical AVNRT and in only 1 of the 21 (5%) in AVRT (P < 0.001). DP was demonstrated in 10 patients (63%) in atypical AVNRT and in 4 (19%) in AVRT (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of V-H-A for atypical AVNRT was higher than that of DP (P < 0.05). Positive and negative predictive values were 94% and 100%, respectively, for V-H-A and 71% and 74%, respectively, for DP. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of V-H-A during ventricular extrastimulation is a simple criterion for differentiating atypical AVNRT masquerading AVRT from AVRT utilizing a posterior paraseptal accessory pathway.     

Determination of Repetitive Slow Pathway Conduction for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT

LUKAC, P., et al.: Determination of Repetitive Slow Pathway Conduction for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT. Aims: To determine whether the loss of repetitive slow pathway conduction identifies a successful radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). Methods and results: Thirty nine consecutive patients undergoing ablation of AVNRT using the slow pathway approach were included. At baseline and after each radiofrequency application with an episode of junctional rhythm, repetitive slow pathway conduction was assessed as follows: Effective refractory period of the fast pathway was determined. The coupling interval of the first atrial extrastimulus (A2) was set at 30 ms below the effective refractory period of the fast pathway to ensure its conduction via the slow pathway. The second atrial extrastimulus (A3) was introduced at progressively longer coupling intervals starting from 200 ms until: (1) it propagated to the His bundle or (2) an anterogradely blocked AV nodal echo of A2 appeared before a conducted A3 depolarized the atrium in the His bundle electrogram. The response was termed repetitive slow pathway conduction if A3 was conducted with an   AH > 200 ms   . Application was considered successful if no AVNRT could be induced. Repetitive slow pathway conduction was present after 1 of 39 successful and after 34 of 40 ineffective applications   (P < 0.0001)   . Repetitive slow pathway conduction identified a successful application with 97% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 86% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value. Conclusion: The presence of repetitive slow pathway conduction identifies an unsuccessful application with a clinically meaningful negative predictive value. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:827–835)     

Acute and long-term results of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia--an analysis of the predictive factors for arrhythmia recurrence

BACKGROUND: Predictors of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) recurrence after radiofrequency ablation including the importance of residual slow pathway conduction are not known. The aim of this study was to report the acute and long-term results of slow pathway ablation in a large series of consecutive patients with AVNRT and to analyze the potential predictors of arrhythmia recurrence with a particular emphasis on the residual slow pathway conduction after ablation. METHODS: The study included 506 consecutive patients with AVNRT (mean age 52.6 +/- 16 years, 315 women) who underwent slow pathway ablation using a combined electrophysiological and anatomical approach. The end point of ablation procedure was noninducibility of the arrhythmia. The primary end point of the study was the recurrence of AVNRT. RESULTS: Acute success was achieved in 500 patients (98.8%). After ablation, 471 patients (93%) were followed up for a mean of 903 +/- 692 days. Of the 465 patients with successful ablation, 24 patients (5.2%) developed AVNRT recurrences during the follow-up. No significant differences in the cumulative rates of AVNRT recurrence were observed in groups with or without electrophysiological evidence of residual slow pathway conduction (P = 0.25, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis identified only age as an independent predictor of AVNRT recurrence (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99, P = 0.004) with younger patients being at an increased risk for arrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that only younger age, but not other clinical or electrophysiological parameters including residual slow pathway conduction predicted an increased risk for AVNRT recurrence after slow pathway radiofrequency ablation.     

Specificity of Retrograde Conduction in Screening for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Baseline AV conduction properties (antegrade and retrograde) are often used to assess the presence of dual AV nodal physiology or concealed AV accessory pathways. Although retrograde conduction (RET) is assumed to be a prerequisite for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), its prevalence during baseline measurements has not been evaluated. We reviewed all cases of AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation to determine the prevalence of RET at baseline evaluation and after isoproterenol infusion. Results: Seventy-three patients with AVNRT underwent full electrophysiological evaluation. Sixty-six patients had manifest RET and inducible AVNRT during baseline atrial and ventricular stimulation. Seven patients initially demonstrated complete RET block despite antegrade evidence of dual AV nodal physiology. In 3 of these 7 patients AVNRT was inducible at baseline despite the absence of RET. In the other four patients isoproterenol infusion was required for induction of AVNRT, however only 3 of these 4 patients developed RET. One of these remaining patients had persistent VA block after isoproterenol. Conclusions: The induction of AVNRT in the absence of RET suggests that this is not an obligatory feature of this arrhythmia. Therefore, baseline AV conduction properties are unreliable in assessing the presence of AVNRT and isoproterenol infusions should be used routinely to expose RET and reentrant tachycardia.     

Radiofrequency ablation of probable atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with documented supraventricular tachycardia without inducible tachycardia

The reproducible induction of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) during electrophysiological study is critical for the diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), and for determining a therapeutic endpoint for catheter ablation. In the sedated state, there are patients with reentry SVT due to AVNRT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. This article reports on the empiric slow pathway modification for AVNRT in six pediatric patients (age 6-17, mean 13.3 years) with documented, recurrent, paroxysmal SVT in the setting of a structurally normal heart who were not inducible at electrophysiological study. Atrial and ventricular burst and extrastimulus pacing at multiple drive cycle lengths were performed in the baseline state, during an isuprel infusion, and during isuprel elimination. Single AV nodal (AVN) echo beats were present in all patients, while classic dual AVN physiology was present in three of six patients. Radiofrequency energy was administered in the right posteroseptal AV groove resulting in accelerated junctional rhythm in five of six patients. Postablation testing demonstrated the elimination of echo beats in four patients, while dual AVN physiology and echo beats persisted in two patients. At follow-up (22-49 months, mean 29.5 months), all patients are asymptomatic without recurrence of SVT and are not taking any antiarrhythmic medication. In selected patients, empiric slow pathway modification may be offered as a potential cure in children with recurrent paroxysmal SVT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. Elimination of slow pathway conduction may serve as a surrogate endpoint, though is not necessary for long-term success.     

Shortcut Link Between the Fast and Slow Pathways and the Mechanism of Cure in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia by Catheter Ablation

The mechanism of cure in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by catheter ablation has not been fully clarified. We hypothesized that disruption of a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways is responsible for the elimination of tachycardia. Results: AVNRT was eliminated in 20 patients by catheter ablation. In five patients (25%; group 1) slow pathway conduction disappeared 1 week after ablation. In six patients (30%; group II), the effective refractory period of the slow pathway was prolonged by more than 50 ms (212 ± 81 ms vs 340 ± 81 ms; P < 0.05). In the remaining nine patients (45%; group III), there was no change in the refractory period (270 ± 65 ms vs 273 ± 74 ms), although tachycardia was not inducible. A shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways was examined by comparing the A-H intervals over the slow pathway during the tachycardia and during atrial pacing at the tachycardia cycle length. Prior to ablation, a shortcut link was assumed in 1 of group I patients, 2 of group II patients, and 8 of group III patients. Of the 9 patients in whom the slow pathway was not impaired after ablation (group III), 8 patients were found to have a shortcut link, while 8 of 11 patients with impairment of the slow pathway after ablation (groups I and II) had no shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways, slow pathway conduction itself does not need to be impaired to eliminate the AVNRT, whereas in patients without this shortcut link, slow pathway conduction must be impaired.     

Age Related Changes in Dual AV Nodal Physiology

Dual atrioventricular nodal (DAVN) physiology has been reported in up to 63% of pediatric patients with anatomically normal hearts, yet atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) accounts for only 13%–16% of supraventicular tachycardia (SVT) in childhood. The incidence of AVNRT increases with age and becomes the most common form of SVT by adolescence. We investigated the age related electrophysiological responses to programmed atrial and ventricular stimulation in 14 pediatric patients who underwent intracardiac electro-physiological study prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT and who exhibited DAVN physiology. Single atrial and ventricular extrastimuli were placed following drive trains with cycle lengths of 400–700 ms and 350–500 ms, respectively. Six children (mean age 8.2 years, range 5.2–11.5 years) were compared to eight adolescents (mean age 16.6 years, range 13.3–20.7 years). Adolescents were found to have a significantly longer fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) (median 375 vs 270 ms, P = 0.03), slow pathway ERP (median 270 vs 218 ms, P = 0.04), atrio-Hisian (AH) during AVNRT (median 300 vs 225 ms, P = 0.007), and AVNRT cycle length (median 350 vs 290ms, P = 0.03). There was a strong trend for the AH measured at the fast pathway ERP to be longer in adolescents than in children (median 258 vs 198 ms, P = 0.055). The AH at the fast pathway ERP was more strongly correlated with baseline cycle length than with age (r = 0.7, P = 0.01 vs r = 0.5, P = 0.7). There was no significant difference in the retrograde VA conduction between adolescents and children. These results demonstrate an age related difference in AV nodal response to programmed atrial stimuli in pediatric patients with DAVN physiology and AVNRT. These differences are consistent with mechanisms that may explain the increased incidence of AVNRT in adolescents compared to children.     

Relation between the AH interval and the ablation site in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The determinants of slow pathway conduction in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are still unknown, and great differences in the AH interval during slow pathway conduction are observed between patients. In 35 patients with typical AVNRT who underwent successful slow pathway ablation (defined as complete elimination of dual pathway physiology), the A2H2 interval at the "jump" during programmed atrial stimulation and the AH interval during AVNRT (as a reflection of slow pathway conduction time) and the fluoroscopic distance between the successful ablation site and the His-bundle recording site and between the coronary sinus ostium (CSO) and the His-bundle recording site were determined. The mean (+/- SEM) AH interval during slow pathway conduction was 323 +/- 12 ms with programmed stimulation and 310 +/- 10 ms during AVNRT. The mean number of energy applications was 8 +/- 1 (range 1-21). The mean distances between (1) the successful ablation site and the His bundle recording site and (2) between the CSO and the His-bundle recording site were 24 +/- 1 and 28 +/- 1 mm in the RAO and 23 +/- 1 and 28 +/- 1 mm in the LAO projections, respectively. The AH interval during slow pathway conduction correlated significantly with the distance between the successful ablation site and the His-bundle (P < 0.001) but not with the distance between CSO and His-bundle recording site. There is a significant correlation between the AH interval during slow pathway conduction and the distance of the successful ablation site from the His bundle. This relationship (1) suggests that, in addition to functional factors, anatomic factors influence slow pathway conduction and (2) may be helpful in determining the initial energy application site during slow pathway ablation.     

The electrophysiological characteristics in patients with ventricular stimulation inducible fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. METHODS: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%). RESULTS: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.     

Electrophysiology of inducible atrial flutter in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

An association between atrial flutter and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) has been observed, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined. This issue was therefore investigated by comparing the electrophysiological properties of AVNRT patients with and without inducible atrial flutter and those of patients with a history of flutter. Twenty-nine patients with clinically documented atrial flutter and 104 with AVNRT were studied. Atrial flutter was induced in 38 (37%) AVNRT patients during standardized electrophysiological testing before radiofrequency ablation. The atrial relative refractory periods in AVNRT patients with inducible flutter (260 +/- 30 ms) were significantly shorter than those of either patients with a history of flutter (282 +/- 30 ms; P = 0.02) or AVNRT patients without inducible flutter (284 +/- 38 ms; P = 0.006). The atrial effective refractory periods in AVNRT patients with inducible flutter (205 +/- 31 ms) were shorter than in AVNRT patients without inducible flutter (227 +/- 40 ms; P = 0.01). The maximum AH interval during premature atrial stimulation in patients with clinical flutter (239 +/- 94 ms) was shorter than in AVNRT patients either with (290 +/- 91 ms; P = 0.04) or without inducible flutter (313 +/- 101 ms; P = 0.002). However, no significant differences were found in the maximum AH interval achieved during incremental atrial pacing among different groups. Our data show that a non-clinical flutter could more often be induced in those who had short atrial refractoriness. Despite their anatomical proximity, the slow pathway conduction of AVNRT and the isthmus slow conduction of flutter may be related to different mechanisms.     

A Direct Midseptal Approach to Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Ablation

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe a midseptal approach to selective slow pathway ablation for the treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). In addition, predictors of success and recurrence were evaluated. Methods: Selective ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway utilizing radiofrequency (RF) energy and a midseptal approach was attempted in 60 consecutive patients with inducible AVNRT. Results: Successful slow pathway ablation or modification was achieved in 59 of 60 patients (98%) during a single procedure. One patient developed inadvertent complete AV block (1.6%). A mean of 2,7 ±1.4 RF applications were required with mean total procedure, ablation, and fluoroscopic times of 191± 6.3, 22.8 ± 2.3, and 28.2 ±1.8 minutes, respectively. The PR and AH intervals, as well as the antegrade and retrograde AV node block cycle length, were unchanged. However, the fast pathway effective refractory period was significantly shortened following ablation (354± 13 msec vs 298 ± 12 msec; P= 0.008). The A/V ratio at successful ablation sites were no different than those at unsuccessful sites (0.22 ± 0.04 vs 0.23± 0.03). Junctional tachycardia was observed during all successful and 60 of 122 (49%) unsuccessful RF applications (P < 0.0001). A residual AV nodal reentrant echo was present in 15 of 59 (25%) patients, During a mean follow-up of 20.1± 0.6 months (11.5–28 months) there were four recurrences (5%), 4 of 15 (27%) in patients with and none of 44 patients without residual slow pathway conduction (P = 0.002). Conclusions: A direct midseptal approach to selective ablation of the slow pathway is a safe, efficacious, and efficient technique. Junctional tachycardia during RF energy application was a highly sensitive but not specific predictor of success and residual slow pathway conduction was associated with a high rate of recurrence.     

Acute effects of simvastatin to terminate fast reentrant tachycardia through increasing wavelength of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia circuit

Simvastatin (SV) leads to reduction of ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation on rabbit atrioventricular (AV) nodes. The aim of our study was (i) to determine the frequency‐dependent effects of SV in a functional model, and (ii) to assess the effects of SV to suppress experimental AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Selective stimulation protocols were used with two different pacing protocols, His to atrial, and atrial to atrial (AA). An experimental AVNRT model with various cycle lengths was created in three groups of perfused rabbit AV nodal preparations (n = 24) including: SV 3 μm , SV 7 μm , and verapamil 0.1 μm . SV increased nodal conduction time and refractoriness by AA pacing. Different simulated models of slow/fast and fast/slow reentry were induced. SV caused inhibitory effects on the slow anterograde conduction (origin of refractoriness) more than on the fast anterograde conduction time, leading to an increase of tachycardia cycle length, tachycardia wavelength and termination of slow/fast reentrant tachyarrhythmia. Verapamil significantly suppressed the basic and frequency‐dependent intrinsic nodal properties. In addition, SV decreased the incidence of gap and echo beats. The present study showed that SV in a concentration and rate‐dependent manner increased the AV effective refractory period and reentrant tachycardia wavelength that lead to slowing or termination of experimental fast AVNRT. The direction‐dependent inhibitory effect of SV on the anterograde and retrograde dual pathways explains its specific antireentrant actions.     

Demonstration of Right and Left Atrial Dissociation by Atrial Rapid Pacing or Extrastimulation During Fast-Slow (Uncommon) Form of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Some recent works suggest that extranodal atrial fibers may form part of the reenlry circuit in the atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This hypothesis is based on the fact that the perinodal dissection successfully abolished AVNRT while preserving intact AV conduction. Apart from the surgical success, the electrophysiological evidence supporting this hypothesis has not been demonstrated, especially in the uncommon (fast-slow) form of AVNRT. We present some electrophysiological evidence suggesting atrial participation in eight patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT. During the tachycardia, rapid pacing or extrastimulation was done from the orifice of the coronary sinus (CS) and the right atrium (RA), while recording the electrograms of the CS and the low septal RA. In seven patients, right and left atrial dissociation was demonstrated during pacing from the RA, while in the remaining one this was demonstrated from the CS. The interatrial dissociation will be unlikely if the intranodal reentry circuit connects with the atria via a single upper common pathway. This suggests that the upper turnaround of the reentry circuit involves atrial tissue and that the extranodal accessory pathway with long conduction times may form the ascending limb of the circuit (atrionodal reentry). Alternatively, the reentry circuit is entirely intranodal and two or more connecting pathways are present between the atria and the circuit.     

房室结折返性心动过速时房室非同步兴奋的电生理机制

13倒房室结折返性心动过速（AVNRT）,其心动过速时表现为房室非同步兴奋,其中房室2：1传导11例,房室分离2例。房室非同步现象说明心房和心室并非AVNRT折返环路的必须部分。心房参与心动过速取决于结周心房组织的不应期,心室参与心动过速取决于希浦系统的不应期,由于心房组织的不应期通常较短,而希浦系统的不应用相对较长,因此非同步现象以房室阻滞或分离多见,室房阻滞或分离少见。正确识别AVNRT时房室非同步兴奋现象对于AVNRT的正确诊断及导管消融治疗有非常重要的意义。     

Sustained Slow Pathway Conduction: Superior to Dual Atrioventricular Node Physiology in Young Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia?

BACKGROUND: Young patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) frequently do not display discrete dual AV node physiology (DAVNP) as classically defined. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence of sustained slow pathway conduction (SSPC; PR > RR during atrial pacing) in young patients with AVNRT and compare it to dual atrioventricular node physiology. METHODS: The presence of SSPC and DAVNP was prospectively assessed before and after radiofrequency catheter ablation in 61 young patients (age 4-23 years) with typical AVNRT. RESULTS: Prior to ablation, 32 (52%) displayed DAVNP, while 46 (75%) displayed SSPC; 7 patients (11%) had neither marker. Patients with DAVNP were older than those without (15 +/- 3 vs 13 +/- 4, P = 0.027) and the prevalence increased with age (38% <13 years, 50% 13-15, 70% >15, P = 0.041), while SSPC showed no age predilection. Patients under 13 years displayed SSPC more commonly than DAVNP (81% vs 38%, P = 0.004). DAVNP persisted after ablation in 10/32 (31%) patients, compared to 6/46 (13%) with persistent SSPC after ablation. The ability to use loss of the marker (present before, absent after ablation) as a surrogate for successful ablation was greater for SSPC than for DAVNP (66% vs 36%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: SSPC is more common than DAVNP in young patients with AVNRT. SSPC is eliminated more frequently than DAVNP after acutely successful ablation, and appears to be a better indicator of the substrate for AVNRT. Elimination of SSPC may serve as a useful surrogate endpoint for slow pathway ablation.     

Inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant echo behind organic 2:1 infra-hisian block during sinus rhythm

A 77-year-old male patient with an intermittent 2:1 infra-Hisian block during sinus rhythm was presented with dizziness and near-syncope. During electrophysiological (EP) study, dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways and retrograde fast pathway were easily induced by atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, respectively. A typical slow-fast AV nodal reentrant echo beat also could be demonstrated by single atrial extrastimulation. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can occasionally exhibit 2:1 AV block. Conversely, AV nodal reentry property had been rarely reported behind 2:1 infra-Hisian block. The EP presentation from this case may support the notion that tissues below the His are not part of the reentrant circuit of AVNRT.     

Pseudotermination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia related to isorhythmic atrioventricular dissociation

Unusual manifestations of the mode of termination were observed in a patient with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). After administration of verapamil during AVNRT, isorhythmic atrioventricular dissociation occurred without termination of the tachycardia. The sinus rate was slightly faster than that of the AVNRT, leading to the P wave preceding the QRS complex with a normal PR interval (e.g., pseudotermination). This phenomenon emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring during an attempt to terminate AVNRT.     

Pacemapping of the triangle of Koch: a simple method to reduce the risk of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

Slow pathway ablation in common AVNRT can be complicated by total AV block. When radiofrequency energy is delivered to the posterior aspect of the triangle of Koch, total AV block may be the consequence of the absence of anterograde conduction along the fast pathway or of inadvertent damage to a fast pathway abnormally located close to the slow pathway. To localize the anterogradely conducting fast pathway, the triangle of Koch was pacemapped in 72 patients who underwent the ablation of common AVNRT. In all cases, before ablation the St-H interval was calculated by stimulating the anteroseptal (AS), mid-septal (MS), and posteroseptal (PS) aspect of the triangle of Koch at a rate slightly faster than the sinus rate. In all patients, common AVNRT was induced. In 64 (89%) of 72 patients (group A) the shortest St-H interval was recorded on stimulating the AS region. In six (8%) patients (group B) the shortest St-H interval was recorded on stimulating the MS region. Finally, in two (3%) patients (group C) the shortest St-H interval was recorded stimulating in the PS region. In group C, AH interval, calculated on stimulating in the AS region, was significantly longer than in patients of groups A and B (200 +/- 99 ms vs 64 +/- 18 and 62 +/- 3, respectively). In group A, on stimulating in the AS, MS, and PS regions, the AH interval remained constant in all patients. In contrast, in groups B and C on stimulation in the MS and PS regions, AH interval shortened (in group B from 56 +/- 8 to 27 +/- 37 and 37 +/- 14, respectively; in group C from 200 +/- 99 to 170 +/- 100 and to 137 +/- 109, respectively). In groups A and B, a posteroseptal slow pathway, and in group C, an anteroseptal retrograde fast pathway were successfully ablated without AV block. Pacemapping of the triangle of Koch can help to recognize patients in whom the anterograde conducting fast pathway is abnormally located far from the anteroseptal region or in whom anterograde conduction of the fast pathway is absent. In these cases the risk of AV block can be reduced by performing slow pathway ablation in a site sufficiently far from the site of the anterograde fast pathway or ablating the retrogradely conducting fast pathway.