Docetaxel (taxotere) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel is a new semi-synthetic anticancer agent derived from bacatin III of the needles of the European yew Taxus baccata. Docetaxel has a novel mechanism of action since it binds to tubulin inducing its polymerization and promoting stable microtubule formation. Several differences exist between docetaxel and paclitaxel: (i) broader activity of docetaxel against freshly explanted human tumors than paclitaxel; (ii) a 2-fold higher affinity than paclitaxel; (iii) 2.5-fold more potent than paclitaxel as an inhibitor of cell replication and (iv) docetaxel acts at the S-phase whereas paclitaxel at the G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle. Preclinical and phase II studies revealed that docetaxel is active against NSCLC. In chemotherapy-na ve patients with NSCLC response rates ranged from 19% to 54% with a median duration of survival ranging from 6.3 months to 11 months, and 1-year survival ranging from 21% to 71%. Docetaxel as single agent provided a survival as well as a clinical benefit over BSC in untreated patients with NSCLC. Docetaxel has been efficiently combined with cisplatin (ORR 33%-46%), carboplatin (ORR 30%-48%), vinorelbine (ORR 20%-51%), gemcitabine (ORR 37%-47%), with a median survival ranging from 5-14 months. A preliminary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing docetaxel/CDDP with docetaxel/gemcitabine revealed that the two regimens had comparable activity in terms, of response rates, duration of response, TTP and overall survival; however, the docetaxel/gemcitabine combination has a most favourable toxicity profile compared to docetaxel/CDDP. Docetaxel has also demonstrated radiosensitizing properties and encouraging results have been achieved in combination with irradiation. Finally, docetaxel has shown an important activity in previously-treated patients with NSCLC with ORR ranging from 16% to 25% with a median survival ranging from 7.2 months to 10.5 months. Randomized trials revealed that second-line docetaxel confers a survival benefit over either BSC or ifosfamide/vinorelbine in pretreated patients with NSCLC.     

The current status of docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel is an active single agent in both first- and second-line therapy of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized trials versus best supportive care have documented an improvement in overall survival for docetaxel therapy in both settings. Docetaxel also produced a significant 1-year survival rate improvement when compared with vinorelbine or ifosfamide as second-line therapy. Docetaxel has been extensively investigated in phase I/II studies in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin, irinotecan and gemcitabine. Substantial activity has been demonstrated. In a randomized phase II trial comparing docetaxel plus cisplatin with docetaxel plus gemcitabine, the efficacy of the two regimens was almost identical (response rates 32 and 34%; 1-year survival rates 42 and 38%). However, the combination of docetaxel with gemcitabine was associated with significantly less grade III/IV neutropenia, diarrhea and nausea/vomiting. Three drug regimens combining docetaxel with, for example, gemcitabine and carboplatin or with ifosfamide and cisplatin, are producing very high response rates in phase II trials. Whether three-drug combinations including docetaxel will result in an improved outcome for patients with advanced NSCLC remains to be determined.     

Docetaxel: a review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel, a semisynthetic member of the taxoid class of antineoplastic agents, is effective in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In noncomparative trials in patients with NSCLC, docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 20 to 38% and 14 to 25% as a first-line or second-line monotherapy, respectively. In Japan, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 19 to 25% in previously untreated patients. Docetaxel 100 or 75 mg/m2 produced significantly higher response rates than either vinorelbine or ifosfamide in previously treated patients; patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 had an improved 1-year survival rate compared with those who received vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Docetaxel monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients produced survival rates that are similar to those reported for most platinum-containing standard combinations such as cisplatin plus vinorelbine. Combination of docetaxel with one other antineoplastic resulted in objective response rates of 20 to 54% in chemotherapy-naive patients; triple chemotherapy combinations produced responses in 51 and 60% of patients. Promising results from a few small studies and one large phase II study have also indicated a potential role for docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy. The main dose-limiting adverse event associated with docetaxel is neutropenia, and fluid retention is common in many patients. The tolerability profile is generally acceptable in the majority of patients, although extra care has to be taken in patients with impaired liver function to minimise the risk of severe or febrile neutropenia. Conclusions. Docetaxel is generally well tolerated by patients receiving treatment for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, and produces response and survival rates equivalent to many current standard treatment options. Comparative studies have shown that docetaxel monotherapy provides significant survival benefits over best supportive care or treatment with vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Response and 1-year survival rates with docetaxel monotherapy are particularly encouraging in patients refractory or resistant to cisplatin or carboplatin, for whom treatment options are few. Neoadjuvant docetaxel has produced improved survival compared with local treatment alone. Combinations of docetaxel with other antineoplastic agents have produced relatively high response and 1-year survival rates; however, further comparative studies are required to confirm these benefits. In the meantime, docetaxel is a welcome addition to the options available for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Biweekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Galician Lung Cancer Group (GGCP 006-00)

This phase II trial assessed the antitumoral activity and toxicity of docetaxel 50 mg/m (1-h i.v. infusion) administered every 2 weeks as second-line treatment in 45 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 251 infusions (median 4 per patient) were administered. The actual and relative median dose intensity values were 24.2 mg/m/week and 0.97, respectively. Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for tumor response. The overall response rate was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8-32%] and included one complete response (2%) and eight partial responses (18%). Stable disease was found in seven patients (16%). With a median follow-up of 4 months, the median time to disease progression was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.9-3.7), the median overall survival was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.4-4.6) and the 1-year survival rate was 23% (95% CI 9-37). The every-2-weeks docetaxel schedule was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities showed rates of 5% or less of patients and 2% or less of cycles. The main grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (16% of patients and 8% of cycles). No febrile neutropenia was found. Nevertheless, one toxic death was reported. We conclude that the biweekly docetaxel schedule showed an antitumoral activity similar to that found with the every-3-weeks or weekly docetaxel schedule in a second-line setting for advanced NSCLC. This antitumoral effect was associated with a marked reduction in hematological toxicity, therefore suggesting that this new docetaxel schedule might be useful in the design of combined second-line schedules for treating NSCLC.     

Phase II, open-label, randomized study (SIGN) of single-agent gefitinib (IRESSA) or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIb or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer

Our objective was to evaluate gefitinib (IRESSA), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, versus docetaxel as second-line monotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SIGN (Second-line Indication of Gefitinib in NSCLC; code 1839IL/0503) was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, phase II trial that investigated oral gefitinib (250 mg/day) or i.v. docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced NSCLC who had previously received one chemotherapy regimen. The primary objective was assessment of symptom improvement (using the FACT-L Lung Cancer Subscale). Secondary objectives included quality of life (FACT-L total score), response rate (using RECIST), overall survival and safety. This trial recruited 141 patients (68 to gefitinib and 73 to docetaxel) who received treatment for a median duration of 3.0 (gefitinib) and 2.8 (docetaxel) months. Similar efficacy was observed with gefitinib and docetaxel, 36.8 and 26.0% symptom improvement rates, 33.8 and 26.0% quality-of-life improvement rates, 13.2 and 13.7% objective response rates, and 7.5 and 7.1 months median overall survival, respectively. Fewer drug-related adverse events were observed with gefitinib compared with docetaxel (all grades: 51.5 versus 78.9%; Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4: 8.8 versus 25.4%). There were no withdrawals or deaths due to drug-related adverse events with gefitinib, while three patients withdrew and three died due to adverse events in the docetaxel group that were possibly drug related. We conclude efficacy with gefitinib was similar to docetaxel, but with a more favorable tolerability profile, in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. These results support further investigation of gefitinib in this disease setting.     

Phase II trial of docetaxel with dexamethasone premedication in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the Canadian experience

We performed a Phase II trial to evaluate the activity and tolerability of docetaxel as a single agent in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-four patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC received i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a median of 4 (range 1–11) cycles. All patients received premedication with oral dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 5 days starting the day before chemotherapy. Seven partial responses were observed among 35 evaluable patients, and the overall response rate was 20% (95% CI 8-37). The median response duration was 5 months, median survival time was 10 months and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 42%. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 10 patients (23%); neutropenic infection occurred in 4 patients, and led to 2 toxic deaths (both patients had borderline exclusion criteria). The corticosteroid premedication effectively reduced the overall incidence (34%) and severity (4% severe) of fluid retention, and delayed the median time to onset from cycle 4 to cycle 7. This study shows the promising efficacy of docetaxel as monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and combination chemotherapy regimens incorporating docetaxel are now being evaluated in this clinical setting.     

Phase II trial of docetaxel with dexamethasone premedication in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the Canadian experience

We performed a Phase II trial to evaluate the activity and tolerability of docetaxel as a single agent in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-four patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC received i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a median of 4 (range 1-11) cycles. All patients received premedication with oral dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 5 days starting the day before chemotherapy. Seven partial responses were observed among 35 evaluable patients, and the overall response rate was 20% (95% CI 8-37). The median response duration was 5 months, median survival time was 10 months and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 42%. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 10 patients (23%); neutropenic infection occurred in 4 patients, and led to 2 toxic deaths (both patients had borderline exclusion criteria). The corticosteroid premedication effectively reduced the overall incidence (34%) and severity (4% severe) of fluid retention, and delayed the median time to onset from cycle 4 to cycle 7. This study shows the promising efficacy of docetaxel as monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and combination chemotherapy regimens incorporating docetaxel are now being evaluated in this clinical setting.     

Novel combination chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a vexing problem and long-term survival beyond 5 years is extremely rare. Five new agents, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine and irinotecan, have been introduced for the treatment of NSCLC and investigated extensively both preclinically and clinically. Monotherapy with one of these agents has produced survival benefits over the best supportive care in Phase III studies. Combination chemotherapy with a new agent and platinum produced a higher response rate than conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy and improved survival was observed in some randomised trials. There was little difference in efficacy and toxicity between the chemotherapeutic regimens with a new agent and a platinum in Phase III trials, suggesting the clinical utility of these regimens is similar. Many trials have focused on regimens containing two new agents, with or without platinum. Preliminary results of Phase III trials of three drug combinations versus two drug combinations suggested the former to be more promising, in terms of response rates and survival. Whether the era of platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC should continue or not must be determined by Phase III trials, evaluating the use of a platinum agent with one of the new agent combinations. These aggressive chemotherapeutic combinations will hopefully improve survival and quality of life for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Novel combination chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a vexing problem and long-term survival beyond 5 years is extremely rare. Five new agents, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine and irinotecan, have been introduced for the treatment of NSCLC and investigated extensively both preclinically and clinically. Monotherapy with one of these agents has produced survival benefits over the best supportive care in Phase III studies. Combination chemotherapy with a new agent and platinum produced a higher response rate than conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy and improved survival was observed in some randomised trials. There was little difference in efficacy and toxicity between the chemotherapeutic regimens with a new agent and a platinum in Phase III trials, suggesting the clinical utility of these regimens is similar. Many trials have focused on regimens containing two new agents, with or without platinum. Preliminary results of Phase III trials of three drug combinations versus two drug combinations suggested the former to be more promising, in terms of response rates and survival. Whether the era of platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC should continue or not must be determined by Phase III trials, evaluating the use of a platinum agent with one of the new agent combinations. These aggressive chemotherapeutic combinations will hopefully improve survival and quality of life for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Docetaxel: an update of its use in advanced breast cancer

Docetaxel, a semisynthetic member of the taxoid class of antineoplastic agents, is effective in the treatment of patients with advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) breast cancer. Reported objective response rates for docetaxel 100 mg/m2 ranged from 54 to 69% and 53 to 82% as first-line monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively. Objective response rates of 23 to 65% and 30 to 81% have been reported for docetaxel as second-line monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively. In Japanese studies, second-line docetaxel 60 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 42 to 55%. At the recommended dose of 100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks, docetaxel had significantly greater efficacy than doxorubicin, mitomycin plus vinblastine and methotrexate plus fluorouracil, and similar efficacy to fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. In chemotherapy-naive patients, first-line combined therapy with docetaxel and doxorubicin had significantly greater efficacy than doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide. Promising results have been achieved in phase I/II trials of a weekly regimen of docetaxel (generally 30 to 45 mg/m2). Preliminary data indicate a potential role for docetaxel in the neoadjuvant therapy of early breast cancer. The major dose-limiting adverse event associated with docetaxel is neutropenia. Although other adverse events are common, the tolerability profile of docetaxel is generally acceptable in the majority of patients, particularly in comparison with other antineoplastic regimens. Conclusions: Although no single standard regimen has been identified as optimal for the treatment of advanced breast cancer, phase III trials have shown that docetaxel has improved efficacy over doxorubicin alone (considered one of the current gold standards), methotrexate/fluorouracil and mitomycin/vinblastine in second-line therapy. In combination with doxorubicin, docetaxel has demonstrated better efficacy than doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in first-line therapy. These results provide a basis for therapy choice in advanced breast cancer. Clinical trials comparing docetaxel monotherapy versus paclitaxel monotherapy and versus docetaxel combination therapy are warranted. The role of docetaxel in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer is being evaluated.     

Phase II trial of i.v. vinorelbine and cisplatin in inoperable locally advanced or disseminated non-small-cell lung cancer: the South African experience

PURPOSE: This multicentre phase II trial was conducted in South Africa to evaluate the activity of a combination of vinorelbine, administered in a new schedule, and cisplatin, in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1995 and December 1996, 35 patients were enrolled. All patients had at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion. Vinorelbine was administered intravenously on day 1 and day 8 at a dose of 30 mg/m2 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 at a dose of 100 mg/m2. The chemotherapy cycle was repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: Of 35 evaluable patients, 14 (40%) achieved a response (one complete response and 13 partial responses). The median time to progression was 6.4 months (range 12-572 days) and the median survival was 15.7 months (range 12-882+ days). One-year survival was 56%. Toxicity was manageable and consisted of nausea and vomiting (grade 3 in 45% of patients) and grade 3-4 neutropenia seen in 13 patients with three patients experiencing grade 3 infection. Other side-effects were mild, including constipation grade 3 in 9.1%. A total of 153 courses were administered with patients receiving a median dose intensity of 81.7% for vinorelbine, while that of cisplatin was 74.1%. CONCLUSION: The combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin demonstrated substantial activity in terms of objective response and survival with manageable side-effects in patients with advanced NSCLC. These findings confirm the data from previous randomised studies. Further studies are ongoing in order to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting.     

Biweekly administration of docetaxel and vinorelbine as second-line chemotherapy for patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Galician Lung Cancer Group (GGCP 013-02)

The current report aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of a biweekly administration of docetaxel and vinorelbine to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, who had previously been treated for this disease. In a prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial, patients received 40 mg/m of docetaxel and 20 mg/m of vinorelbine on days 1 and 15, every 28 days. Treatment continued for up to a maximum of six cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred, or consent was withdrawn. Fifty patients were enrolled in the study and they received 174 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of three cycles per patient. All patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity in an intention-to-treat analysis. The overall response rate was 10% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1-19], including one complete response (2%) and four partial responses (8%). Previous chemotherapy of 80% of the responders included paclitaxel. Median time to disease progression was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.2-4.3) and median overall survival was 6.5 months (95% CI: 2.5-9.2). The survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 18% (95% CI: 7-29) and 4% (95% CI: 0-10), respectively. The most frequent severe toxicities were neutropenia (20% of patients) and leukopenia (8% of patients). Other toxicities appeared in 4% or fewer of the patients. Biweekly administration of docetaxel and vinorelbine is feasible as a second-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer patients, but its level of activity and toxicity does not suggest any advantage compared with the results obtained with single-agent docetaxel in the same setting.     

Vinorelbine: a review of its use in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid that is effective as monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the large comparative Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study (ELVIS), patients receiving vinorelbine monotherapy achieved an objective response rate of 19.7%. The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were significantly higher in recipients of vinorelbine plus best supportive care than in recipients of best supportive care alone. Vinorelbine recipients generally scored better than recipients of best supportive care on quality-of-life (QOL) functioning scales and experienced significantly fewer lung cancer-related symptoms; however, QOL scores were worse with vinorelbine for parameters relating to drug tolerability. Comparative phase III trials investigating the efficacy of combination therapy with vinorelbine and other agents specifically in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC have been conducted only for the combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine [the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) trial and the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES)]. Objective response rates for vinorelbine/gemcitabine combination therapy in these phase III trials were 22 and 20%, respectively. The SICOG trial was closed early when an interim analysis demonstrated a significant survival advantage for combination therapy with vinorelbine plus gemcitabine over vinorelbine monotherapy. However, a survival advantage for combination therapy versus vinorelbine monotherapy was not demonstrated in the larger MILES trial. The main adverse effect of vinorelbine monotherapy in the elderly is myelosuppression. Adverse events associated with most antineoplastic agents, such as mild alopecia, nausea, vomiting and mucositis, were reported in clinical trials; however, these events were rarely severe. Mild-to-moderate neurotoxicity, including constipation (presumably from autonomic neuropathy), was also reported. The addition of gemcitabine to vinorelbine increased the incidence of both haematological and nonhaematological adverse events. However, there was no significant increase in the incidence of life-threatening toxicity. Vinorelbine as a single agent is effective in elderly patients with NSCLC and is associated with improved survival and at least a trend towards improved QOL parameters compared with best supportive care alone. Vinorelbine was associated with a generally manageable tolerability profile. The benefit of adding gemcitabine to vinorelbine for the treatment of NSCLC in the elderly is equivocal; improved survival was reported in one comparative trial, but not in another larger one. Vinorelbine is an effective and well tolerated palliative treatment option for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant or preoperative therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have demonstrated the feasibility, tolerability and activity of this approach. Three randomized trials have reported improved survival in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection compared to surgery alone. Combinations of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus thoracic radiotherapy have also been investigated, generally resulting in higher rates of pathologic response, but higher toxicity rates as well. The best approach to neoadjuvant therapy remains to be determined and may well be substage dependent. In bulky stage III NSCLC, the role of surgery itself remains unclear and is the subject of an ongoing intergroup trial in the US. Regardless, neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as an important paradigm for clinical research since it serves as an in vivo test of chemosensitivity in patients, and represents a 'window of opportunity' for testing new chemotherapeutic agents and novel strategies. Among the new chemotherapeutic agents being investigated in this setting is docetaxel, one of the most active agents in first- and second-line chemotherapy of NSCLC, and a potent radiosensitizer. Preliminary studies have confirmed the feasibility of integrating docetaxel into neoadjuvant treatment strategies and encouraging results have been reported.     

Gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer

Gemcitabine is considered to be one of the most active drugs in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When used as a single agent, gemcitabine yielded response rates consistently > 20%, with a uniformly good tolerance profile. Preclinical data indicated synergism between gemcitabine and platinum compounds, such as cisplatin or carboplatin. The gemcitabine-cisplatin combination is considered one of the reference regimens for advanced NSCLC and the recommended schedule is gemcitabine 1000 - 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 - 8 and cisplatin 70 - 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 or 2. In order to avoid many of the non-haematological toxicities associated with cisplatin, several trials evaluated the gemcitabine-carboplatin combination. Previous trials using the 28-day schedule showed unacceptable haematological toxicity. Recent studies demonstrated the activity and feasibility of gemcitabine-carboplatin combination using a 21-day schedule, with carboplatin administered on day 1 and gemcitabine on days 1 and 8. Gemcitabine can be combined with one of the other new agents, such as the taxanes or vinorelbine, to create novel non-platinum-doublets. Although encouraging, the available data are still conflicting and non-platinum-based combinations are not indicated outside clinical trials. Three-drug combinations increased toxicity and failed to demonstrate any advantage over standard doublets in advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in elderly patients and represents a reasonable therapeutic option. Although no Phase III trials have been conducted to compare gemcitabine to the best supportive care or docetaxel in pretreated NSCLC, gemcitabine alone or in combination with vinorelbine or one of the taxanes can be considered a valid option for second-line treatment in patients who had a previous response or who achieved stable disease with a platinum-containing regimen. Gemcitabine is considered the most radiopotentiating agent available amongst the newer agents we have in terms of activity and toxicity, but the routine use of gemcitabine in combination with radical thoracic radiotherapy, although promising, is not yet recommended. Further testing of gemcitabine-based combinations with concurrent radiation is underway.     

Docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin is a safe and active schedule as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase II study

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) (day 1) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (administered as 40 mg/m(2) doses each on days 1 and 2) every 3 weeks as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-two NSCLC patients were enrolled, most of them with stage IV disease (74%). A total of 195 chemotherapy cycles were administered (median 6, range 1-6). All patients were considered evaluable for efficacy and toxicity in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The overall response rate was 48% (95% CI, 33-64), including one CR (3%) and 19 PRs (45%). Stable disease was found in 6 patients (14%). The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.7) and the median overall survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-16.0). The survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 36.0% (95% CI, 19.9-52.0) and 18.0% (95% CI, 3.9-32.1), respectively. Overall, the combination showed an excellent safety profile. Severe hematological toxicities were uncommon: neutropenia (5% of patients, 1% of cycles) and febrile neutropenia (2% of patients, 0.5% of cycles). Asthenia (12%) was the only grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity that affected more than 10% of patients. There were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients showed similar efficacy as the same combination with higher doses of docetaxel but where cisplatin was administered in a single dose. This new schedule shows promise in its excellent hematological and non-hematological toxicity profile. A randomized phase III trial is needed to confirm these results.     

Taxanes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The emergence of novel chemotherapeutic agents with promising anticancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the 1990s has led to an expanded role for chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) are novel microtubule stabilising agents, and have become an integral part of several commonly-used chemotherapy regimens in NSCLC. Taxanes inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines, exhibit synergistic interaction with other chemotherapy agents and enhance the efficacy of radiation in vitro. When used in low doses (metronomic dosing), they have important antiangiogenic properties. Several Phase II and III clinical trials have established the efficacy of the taxanes, as single agents and when used in combination with a platinum compound, in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The use of a taxane in combination with a platinum compound has become an acceptable standard for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In addition to its efficacy in the first-line therapy of NSCLC, docetaxel is also the FDA-approved second-line agent for recurrent or relapsed NSCLC in the US. Several ongoing trials are comparing the efficacy of combining molecularly targeted agents with taxane-based regimens for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.     

Taxanes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The emergence of novel chemotherapeutic agents with promising anticancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the 1990s has led to an expanded role for chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) are novel microtubule stabilising agents, and have become an integral part of several commonly-used chemotherapy regimens in NSCLC. Taxanes inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines, exhibit synergistic interaction with other chemotherapy agents and enhance the efficacy of radiation in vitro. When used in low doses (metronomic dosing), they have important antiangiogenic properties. Several Phase II and III clinical trials have established the efficacy of the taxanes, as single agents and when used in combination with a platinum compound, in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The use of a taxane in combination with a platinum compound has become an acceptable standard for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In addition to its efficacy in the first-line therapy of NSCLC, docetaxel is also the FDA-approved second-line agent for recurrent or relapsed NSCLC in the US. Several ongoing trials are comparing the efficacy of combining molecularly targeted agents with taxane-based regimens for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.     

Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: The Emerging Role of Docetaxel

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma(NSCLC) has improved greatly over the past decade. With theadvent of new agents, in particular taxanes, gemcitabine, vinorelbine,and topoisomerase I inhibitors, response rates have improved from15–20% to 25–35%, with commensurate improvement in median and one year survival rates to 8–10 months and 35–45%, respectively. These improvements have proven statistically significant in multiple studies [1–4].Docetaxel, either alone or in combination with platinols, hasshown particular promise; and, in some arenas, it has become a standard component of our therapeutic armamentarium. We will review the preclinical data and single agent activity of docetaxel in treatment-naïve and previously treated NSCLC patients, its activityin combination with cisplatin and carboplatin, as well as othernew agents, and finally focus on ongoing studies evaluating itsrole in locally advanced disease.     

Therapeutic applications of medicinal plants in the treatment of breast cancer: a review of their pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability

Various active compounds (or their semi-synthetic derivatives) derived from medicinal plants have been assessed for their efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of breast cancer. Some of these plant species, including Taxus baccata (paclitaxel, docetaxel), Podophyllum peltatum (etoposide), Camptotheca acuminata (camptothecin) and Vinca rosea (vinblastine, vinorelbine) have well recognized antitumour activity in breast cancer, and have been evaluated in clinical trials. For example, results from recent Phase II/III trials have established docetaxel as the most active single agent in the treatment (first or second-line) of advanced metastatic breast cancer. For other plant species such as Panax ginseng and Allium sativum, antitumour activity has been evaluated in experimental studies using cultured cells and animal models, but the therapeutic potential in patients remains to be determined. Antitumour activity derived from medicinal plants may produce results via a number of mechanisms, including effects on cytoskeletal proteins which play a key role in mitosis (paclitaxel), inhibition of activity of topoisomerase enzymes I (camptothecin) or II (etoposide), stimulation of the immune system (Viscum album), or antiprotease-antioxidant activity. Medicinal plant-derived antineoplastic agents may be used in single agent or in combinational therapies, and have been used in first-line or second-line (including anthracycline-refractory patients) treatment of localized or metastatic breast cancer. Adverse effects resulting from the use of these agents include neutropenia and peripheral neuropathies.