Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

A prospective randomized study comparing single embryo transfer with double embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) was carried out. First, top quality embryo characteristics were delineated by retrospectively analysing embryos resulting in ongoing twins after double embryo transfer. A top quality embryo was characterized by the presence of 4 or 5 blastomeres at day 2 and at least 7 blastomeres on day 3 after insemination, the absence of multinucleated blastomeres and <20% cellular fragments on day 2 and day 3 after fertilization. Using these criteria, a prospective study was conducted in women <34 years of age, who started their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Of 194 eligible patients, 110 agreed to participate of whom 53 produced at least two top quality embryos and were prospectively randomized. In all, 26 single embryo transfers resulted in 17 conceptions, 14 clinical and 10 ongoing pregnancies [implantation rate (IR) = 42.3%; ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) = 38.5%] with one monozygotic twin; 27 double embryo transfers resulted in 20 ongoing conceptions with six (30%) twins (IR = 48.1%; OPR = 74%). We conclude that by using single embryo transfer and strict embryo criteria, an OPR similar to that in normal fertile couples can be achieved after IVF/ICSI, while limiting the dizygotic twin pregnancy rate to its natural incidence of <1% of all ongoing pregnancies.     

Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of transferring a single top quality embryo in the first IVF/ICSI cycle of patients <38 years old who chose to have one or two embryos transferred. METHODS: A total of 262 patients participated in the study, and 243 transfers were performed: 156 (64%) patients chose the transfer of a single top quality embryo, if available, and two non-top quality embryos if not available; 87 (36%) patients chose to have a double embryo transfer regardless of embryo quality. RESULTS: In the first group an ongoing pregnancy rate of 40% (63/156) with a twin pregnancy rate of 2% (1/63) was achieved. In the second group the ongoing pregnancy rate was 44% (38/87) with 26% (10/38) twin pregnancies. In the patient group with only one embryo transferred, irrespective of the patient's choice, the ongoing pregnancy rate was 43% (54/127) with no twin pregnancies. For the study population as a whole, the ongoing pregnancy rate was 42% (101/243) with 11% (11/101) twins. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the introduction of single embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle is highly acceptable in women <38 years old.     

Embryos cultured in vitro with multinucleated blastomeres have poor implantation potential in human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

The aim of the present study was to investigate pregnancy rates ensuing from transfer of embryos with multinucleated blastomeres. In our in- vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme, 1735 embryo transfers were performed from January 1, 1995 to August 31, 1996. In 136 of these transfers at least one embryo with one or more multinucleated blastomeres was present per transfer (study group). For each of these 136 transfers, two matched controls with transfer of exclusively mononucleated embryos were selected (control group). Matching was carried out according to age, method of fertilization (IVF or ICSI), number of transferred embryos and quality score of transferred embryos. In the study group, there were eight transfers of exclusively multinucleated embryos from which one pregnancy ensued and 128 transfers in which multinucleated and mononucleated embryos were transferred together leading to 23 pregnancies. The overall clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 16.9% in the study group versus 28.7% in the control group (P = 0.01). The ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer was 13.2% in the study group versus 23.2% in the control group (P = 0.03). The implantation rate per transferred embryo was 6.0% in the study group versus 11.3% in the control group (P = 0.003). This study shows that embryos with one or more multinucleated blastomeres have a poorer implantation potential than embryos with mononucleated blastomeres. Transfer of embryos with multinucleated blastomeres should hence only be considered when insufficient numbers of embryos with only mononucleated blastomeres are present.      

One year's experience with elective transfer of two good quality embryos in the human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection programmes

High incidences of multiple pregnancies, after transferringa maximum of three embryos, were observed after in-vitro fertilization(IVF) treatment. In a randomized study, it was demonstratedthat, after taking into account embryo quality and other positivelyinterfering parameters, an elective transfer of two good qualityembryos does not significantly influence the pregnancy rate.The intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technique was successfullydeveloped in the meantime and high incidences of multiple pregnancieswere also obtained after ICSI. The question arose whether afterICSI there was also room for elective double embryo transferin a well-defined patient group. This report covers 1 year of IVF and ICSI treatment and theresults are presented in relation to the number of embryos transferred.The embryo development is similar for zygotes obtained afterIVF and ICSI; for both techniques 63% of the zygotes developto type A-B embryos and 13% to type C embryos. There is alsono difference in the pregnancy rate after ICSI or IVF. Globally,after IVF, 307 out of the 766 double and triple transfers (40.1%)and 317 out of 774 double and triple transfers (40.9%) afterICSI resulted in a positive HCG. After IVF, 73.9% (227) andafter ICSI 76.3% (242) of the pregnancies were evolutive. Neitherwas there any difference between the two techniques as regardsthe implantation rate per transferred embryo. After IVF, 22.8%of the transferred embryos implanted compared with 21.8% afterICSI. When the elective double embryo transfers were compared,no difference was found between IVF and ICSI. After IVF, 102of the 211 elective double transfers (48.1%) resulted in a pregnancyversus 93 out of 225 (41.3%) after ICSI [not significant (NS)].A high implantation rate per transferred embryo (IVF: 33.2%;ICSI: 26.9%, NS) was obtained in this elective double transfercategory, as was also reported in the randomized study. Thesedata confirm the results obtained in our randomized study andthe effectiveness of the elective double embryo transfer forIVF as well as for ICSI.     

Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: a plea for single embryo transfer

It has been generally accepted that triplets after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) can and should be avoided by adopting a standard strategy of replacing no more than two embryos. However, there is an increasing awareness of the risks and costs and of the epidemic size of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI. This has resulted in efforts to replace no more than one embryo. However, this approach has been hampered by our relative inability to identify embryos with a very high implantation potential. To identify such embryos, a number of strategies are being considered, both at the two pronuclear (2PN), early cleavage and the blastocyst stages. At the 2PN stage, the polarity characteristics of the nucleoli have been shown to be correlated with a high implantation rate. Similarly, the morphological characteristics at day 2 and 3 have been used to describe top quality embryos in approximately 75% of all IVF/ICSI cycles. Blastocyst culture has resulted in very high implantation rates in the hands of some authors. No approach has shown its superiority at present, but initial experience with single embryo transfer (SET) at the early cleavage stage by Scandinavian and Belgian groups shows that an ongoing pregnancy rate of 35% and more can be achieved. Proper identification of patients at risk of a twin pregnancy after double embryo transfer is equally important. It is clear that mainly young patients (aged <34 years) during their first, perhaps first two, IVF/ICSI cycles constitute the main population at risk (responsible for >80% of all twins) and are the main target group for twin prevention by SET of a top quality embryo at whatever stage. Therefore, in our opinion, although a further fine-tuning of both embryo and patient characteristics relating to a high risk for (twin) pregnancy is desirable, SET should be introduced carefully and progressively in each IVF/ICSI programme from now on. Correct counselling is very important and both public and private insurers will have to join in the discussion.     

Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme

BACKGROUND: Data on the effect of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) on the total and multiple pregnancy rates of an IVF/ICSI programme are reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort analysis of eSET was carried out over a 4 year period. A total of 1559 cycles resulted in 1464 transfers; 299 transfers of one top quality embryo (20.4%) and 86 of one non-top quality embryo (5.9%) yielded 149 conceptions (49.8%) with 105 ongoing pregnancies (35.1%) and 26 conceptions (30.2%) with 19 ongoing implantations (22.1%) respectively; 1079 transfers of two (n = 853; 58.3%) or more than two (n = 226; 15.4%) embryos yielded 366 ongoing pregnancies (33.9%). The ongoing pregnancy rates for the years between 1998 and 2001 were 35.9, 27.9, 31.9 and 31.0% per oocyte retrieval and 38.5, 29.4, 34.1 and 33.2% per transfer. There were no differences in pregnancy rates between any of the years. The average ongoing pregnancy rate (>12 weeks) over the 4 years was 31.5% per started cycle and 33.5% per transfer; the average number of embryos transferred decreased from 2.26 (1998) to 1.79 (2001); the multiple pregnancy and twinning rates dropped from 33.6 and 29.5% (1998) to 18.6 and 16.3% (2001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Judicious application of eSET can halve the twinning rate while maintaining the overall pregnancy rate.     

Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF.

BACKGROUND: In order to decrease multiple birth rates without decreasing birth rates overall, it is important to increase the capability of selecting the most optimal embryos for transfer. It has been shown that human embryos which cleave early, i.e. complete the first mitotic division within 25-27 h post insemination, provide higher pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, an evaluation of 10 798 scored embryos showed that early cleavage resulted in a significantly higher proportion of good quality embryos compared with late cleavage (62.5 versus 33.4%, P < 0.0001). When examining both day 2 and day 3 transfers together, early-cleaving embryos (306 transfers) gave rise to significantly higher rates of pregnancy/transfer (40.5 versus 31.3%, P = 0.0049), implantation (28.0 versus 19.5%, P = 0.0001) and birth/ongoing pregnancy (34.3 versus 24.0%, P = 0.0009) than did late-cleaving embryos (521 transfers). A stepwise logistic regression of all data showed that the total number of good quality embryos and female age were independent predictors of both pregnancies and birth. For intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) embryos, early cleavage was found to be an independent predictor of birth. CONCLUSIONS: Early embryo cleavage is a strong biological indicator of embryo potential, and may be used as an additional embryo selection factor for ICSI embryos.     

Factors determining early pregnancy loss in singleton and multiple implantations

BACKGROUND: The incidence of first trimester pregnancy loss is much lower in IVF twin pregnancies than in IVF singleton pregnancies. The objective of this study was to determine which embryonic and maternal factors contribute to this finding. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of the outcome of 1593 pregnancies after day 3 double-embryo transfer (DET) after IVF or ICSI treatment. RESULTS: Of 1148 single implantations at 6 weeks, 936 (81.5%) were ongoing pregnancies. Of 445 multiple implantations at 6 weeks, 354 (79.6%) were ongoing multiple pregnancies, 80 (17.9%) were ongoing singleton pregnancies and 11 (2.5%) ended in a spontaneous abortion. Total pregnancy loss was 18.5 and 2.5% (P < 0.001) in singleton and twin gestations, respectively. Loss per gestational sac was 18.5 and 11.46% (P < 0.001), respectively. Determinants contributing to the continuation of gestation beyond 6 weeks were young maternal age, possibility to cryopreserve embryos and short GnRH agonist flare-up stimulation protocol. Whereas factors promoting multiple implantation at 6 weeks of gestation were young maternal age, high cumulative embryo score (CES), male infertility, long stimulation protocol and thick endometrium. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple implantation at 6 weeks is predominantly determined by (morphological) embryo quality, the continuation of pregnancy beyond 6 weeks becomes more dependent on the combination of genetic and developmental potential of the embryo(s) and an optimal uterine milieu.     

Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. ESHRE Campus Course Report

Twin pregnancies constitute the most serious complication for both mother and children after IVF/ICSI treatment, but transfer of at least two 'best looking' embryos remains the standard policy. This is due to our inability and reluctance to identify both the 'twin prone' patient and the top quality embryo. Some centres now electively transfer a single embryo (eSET) when particular embryo quality and patient criteria are met. Results from several centres were presented during an ESHRE Campus Course, held on May 6(th) 2000. Sound clinical trials are needed to clarify several points of discussion. What is the clinical profile of patients in whom eSET should be considered? Will the overall (ongoing) pregnancy rate of the IVF/ICSI programme decrease if eSET is performed in these patients? What is the twinning rate when eSET is a routine policy? Will the financial gain by avoiding perinatal hospitalization costs of prevented twins be balanced by the likely need to perform a number of extra IVF/ICSI cycles? What will be gained by freezing the extra number of high quality embryos? Should eSET be performed at the 2 pronuclear stage, the early cleaving embryo or the blastocyst stage? Common sense dictates that eSET as a concept should be applied from now onwards.     

Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome

BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (particularly of a top quality embryo) is an excellent model to correlate embryo quality in terms of morphological criteria to early pregnancy. We investigated whether this model could provide us with more information on what happens after implantation in the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: The outcome of 370 consecutive single top quality embryo transfers in patients younger than 38 years was analysed for pregnancy and first-trimester pregnancy loss (FTPL) before 13 weeks of gestation. Analysis was done on each cohort of embryos from which the transferred top quality embryo was selected. Serum HCG levels were measured on day 8 and day 12 after day 3 embryo transfer. The HCG index was calculated as the level of HCG on day 12/HCG on day 8. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate after single top quality embryo transfer was 51.9%. This was independent of the patients' age. FTPL, however, appeared to be age dependent: 15.4% for the whole group, 9% in patients younger than 30 years and 19% in patients above 30 years. The pregnancy rate was 50% in IVF cycles and 52% in ICSI cycles; FTPL was 19% in IVF cycles and 10% in ICSI cycles. Multiple regression analysis showed that these differences originated from age differences between both populations rather than from technique-related factors. An HCG level >or=45 IU/l on day 12 was predictive for ongoing pregnancy with 75.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity; an HCG index >or=3.5 similarly predicted ongoing pregnancy with 72.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that embryo selection for transfer on day 3 can be used as an excellent tool for prediction of pregnancy but not for prediction of FTPL. The pregnancy rate of a single top quality embryo is not related to age, whereas FTPL is age dependent.     

Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome

BACKGROUND: Frozen embryo transfers are characterized by impaired pregnancy outcome and increased incidence of pregnancy loss as compared with fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfers. In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of clinical and embryological factors that potentially influence the outcome of frozen embryo transfer. METHODS: We reviewed the outcome of 1242 frozen embryo transfers with respect to the age of the woman, the method of fertilization, embryo quality before and after freezing and the number of embryos transferred. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The pregnancy (positive hCG) and clinical pregnancy rates were 25.8 and 21.1%, respectively. A total of 107 (33.3%) of the 321 pregnancies identified by a positive hCG test miscarried either before (18.4%) or after (15%) the clinical recognition of gestational sac(s). The delivery rate for the frozen embryo transfers analysed was 17.2%. Our data revealed that the delivery rate after frozen embryo transfer was dependent on both the woman's age and the quality of embryos transferred, at the same time being unaffected by IVF/ICSI treatment. In addition, the increased woman's age at IVF/ICSI treatment was identified as the only parameter elevating the biochemical pregnancy rate, whereas the clinical abortion rate was found to be unrelated to the clinical or embryological parameters studied.     

One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study

BACKGROUND: The main reason for adverse treatment outcome in assisted reproduction is the high rate of multiple pregnancies. The only strategy to avoid dizygotic twins is to transfer one embryo at a time. METHODS: A total of 144 women, who had had at least four good quality embryos available after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and who had no more than one previous failed treatment cycle, were randomized to have either one or two embryos transferred. The treatment outcomes including those after frozen embryo transfer were compared between these groups. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 32.4% in the one embryo transfer group and 47.1% in the two embryo transfer group, the difference being not significant. Eleven twin deliveries (n = 39) occurred in the two embryo transfer group and there was one pair of monozygotic twins in the one embryo transfer group. The cumulative pregnancy rate per patient after transfer of fresh and frozen embryos was 47.3% in the one embryo transfer group and 58.6% in the two embryo transfer group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that among women who have good quality embryos in their first IVF/ICSI, good treatment results can be achieved. They support the idea of changing embryo transfer policy towards one embryo transfer without any remarkable decrease in the success rate, while dizygotic twins can be avoided.     

Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether, in a large randomized trial, it is possible to identify specific maternal and/or embryo variables that could independently correlate with ongoing implantation in IVF/ICSI. METHODS: In a Scandinavian study, 661 women were randomized to elective single embryo transfer or double embryo transfer. Women aged <36 years undergoing their first or second IVF cycle and with at least two good quality embryos were eligible. Only one cycle per subject was included. In the present study, cycles with 0 or 100% ongoing implantation (n = 520) were analysed regarding maternal and embryo variables. RESULTS: In this selected study group, the ongoing implantation rate was 195/734 (26.6%). In the univariate analysis, first IVF cycle, conventional IVF as fertilization method and 4-cell embryos showed a statistically higher ongoing implantation rate than did second IVF cycle, ICSI and non-4-cell embryos. In the multivariate analysis the same variables correlated independently to ongoing implantation. In addition, ovarian sensitivity correlated independently to ongoing implantation. CONCLUSION: This information should be used when selecting the number of embryos for transfer with the overall aim to reduce the rate of multiple births while maintaining a satisfactory birth rate.     

Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based morphological embryo scoring models for ranking of implantation potential are still scarce, and the need for a precise model increases when aiming for singleton pregnancies. METHODS: Prospectively, 2266 IVF/ICSI double-embryo, day 2 transfers were studied. The five variables scored in 3- to 5-step scales for the embryos transferred are blastomere number (BL), fragmentation, blastomere size variation ('equality', EQ), symmetry of the cleavage and mononuclearity in the blastomeres (NU). The scoring results of embryos with an individual traceability from scoring to implantation, i.e. treatments resulting in either no implantation (n=1385) or twin implantation (n=228), were studied for prognostic potential. RESULTS: Although all five variables correlated highly with implantation potential, only BL, NU and EQ remained independently significant after regression analysis. The equation thus derived formed the basis for a 10-point integrated morphology cleavage (IMC) embryo score. A table with the scoring point for each possible combination of the embryo variables is presented. The scoring model was statistically validated on the singleton pregnancy group (n=653). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that this IMC embryo scoring, incorporating cleavage stage and information on the variation in blastomere size and the number of mononucleated blastomeres, may optimize embryo ranking and selection for day 2 transfers.     

The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme.

In order to achieve a clinical pregnancy rate higher than that achieved following initial adoption of in-vitro fertilization embryo transfers, more than one embryo is transferred. This has led to a substantial increase in unwanted multiple pregnancy rates with IVF as compared with natural conception. What is therefore required is a simple, clinically useful embryo scoring system, to reflect embryo developmental potential, which will enable the selection of the optimal number of embryos to transfer in order to achieve the maximum pregnancy rate with a low incidence of high order multiple pregnancies. We believe that the Cumulative Embryo Score (CES) achieves these aims. On the day of embryo transfer the grade of each embryo transferred was multiplied by the number of blastomeres to produce a score for each embryo, and summation of the scores obtained for all the embryos transferred gave the CES. The grouped pregnancy rates obtained rose as the CES increased to maximum of 42. A continued increase in the CES above 42 did not result in any further rise in the pregnancy rate. However, an analysis of all our IVF pregnancies showed that the multiple pregnancy rate continued to rise above a CES of 42. By restricting the CES per embryo transfer to 42, 78% of triplet pregnancies and 100% of the quadruplet IVF pregnancies could have been predicted and potentially avoided.     

Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) after IVF/ICSI has been shown to result in an acceptable pregnancy rate in selected subjects. In our unit, SET is routinely carried out among women under the age of 36 in the first or second treatment cycle when a top-quality embryo is available. In order to define further the selection criteria for SET, we have analysed the outcome of elective SET (eSET), including the cumulative pregnancy rate after frozen embryo transfers, performed in the years 2000-2002 in the Oulu Fertility Center. METHODS: During the study period, a total of 1271 transfers were performed, and in 468 cycles SET (39% of all transfers) was carried out. Of the SET cycles, in 308 cases a top-quality embryo was transferred on day 2 and extra embryos were frozen. Of these eSET cycles, ICSI was carried out in 87 cycles (28%). RESULTS: The overall clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 34.7% in the eSET cycles. In the eSET ICSI cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher than in the corresponding IVF cycles (50.6 versus 28.5%, P < 0.001). The cumulative pregnancy rate per patient after fresh and frozen embryo transfers was also significantly higher after ICSI (71.2 versus 53.4%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A high cumulative pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval can be achieved after eSET in daily clinical practice. The implantation rate of fresh top-quality embryos in the ICSI cycles was significantly higher than in the IVF cycles, possibly due to more successful selection of the embryo for embryo transfer on day 2 after ICSI. In addition, our data suggest that embryo quality is a more important determinant of outcome than the age of the woman.     

Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal

This review considers the value of single embryo transfer (SET) to prevent multiple pregnancies (MP) after IVF/ICSI. The incidence of MP (twins and higher order pregnancies) after IVF/ICSI is much higher (approximately 30%) than after natural conception (approximately 1%). Approximately half of all the neonates are multiples. The obstetric, neonatal and long-term consequences for the health of these children are enormous and costs incurred extremely high. Judicious SET is the only method to decrease this epidemic of iatrogenic multiple gestations. Clinical trials have shown that programmes with >50% of SET maintain high overall ongoing pregnancy rates ( approximately 30% per started cycle) while reducing the MP rate to <10%. Experience with SET remains largely European although the need to reduce MP is accepted worldwide. An important issue is how to select patients suitable for SET and embryos with a high putative implantation potential. The typical patient suitable for SET is young (aged <36 years) and in her first or second IVF/ICSI trial. Embryo selection is performed using one or a combination of embryo characteristics. Available evidence suggests that, for the overall population, day 3 and day 5 selection yield similar results but better than zygote selection results. Prospective studies correlating embryo characteristics with documented implantation potential, utilizing databases of individual embryos, are needed. The application of SET should be supported by other measures: reimbursement of IVF/ICSI (earned back by reducing costs), optimized cryopreservation to augment cumulative pregnancy rates per oocyte harvest and a standardized format for reporting results. To make SET the standard of care in the appropriate target group, there is a need for more clinical studies, for intensive counselling of patients, and for an increased sense of responsibility in patients, health care providers and health insurers.     

Comparison between day-2 embryos obtained either from ICSI or resulting from short insemination IVF: influence of maternal age

Short incubation time prevents deleterious effects of cumulus cell degeneration and excess spermatozoa in IVF embryos. We performed a short incubation (3 h) protocol in 328 IVF cycles, in order to compare the developmental potential of regular IVF embryos with those originating from 316 cycles entered our intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme over the same period. Embryo transfers were performed in all patients on day 2. The mean number of embryos transferred was 1.92 for the ICSI group and 1.73 for the IVF group (P < 0.007). This was related only to the wishes of patients. However, the policy of the centre is to transfer a low number of embryos in young patients in order to avoid multiple pregnancies. All spare embryos were permitted to grow to the blastocyst stage for freezing. Shortening incubation time did not decrease fertilization rates. In our overall population, no difference was observed in the implantation rates per embryo for IVF (19%) or for ICSI (20%). An age-related decrease in embryo production was observed for both groups of patients (P < 0.01 for ICSI and P < 0.001 for IVF). The age-related decrease in embryo implantation was only significant for the IVF group (P < 0.03 for patients <30 and >35 years of age). A significant overall decrease in blastocyst formation was observed for spare embryos after ICSI versus IVF (34.2 versus 43.8%; P < 0. 05). The significance of this observation is discussed.     

Towards defining parameters for a successful single embryo transfer in frozen cycles

BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancies in IVF should be avoided by transferring embryos one at a time, even for frozen cycles. In this study, we investigated the effect of blastomere lysis and cleavage in singleton frozen embryo transfer (sFET) cycles. Outcomes were compared with the transfer of two embryos in frozen transfer cycles (dFET). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 891 FET cycles, involving 404 sFET and 487 dFET cycles. RESULTS: Overall, in sFET cycles, the pregnancy and implantation rates were 8.9 and 8.7%. When blastomere lysis was more than 25% but no greater than 50%, the pregnancy and implantation rates were 3.2%. If blastomere lysis was greater than 50% there were no pregnancies. If blastomere lysis was less than 25%, but with no cleavage, the pregnancy and implantation rates were 4.1%. The results significantly improved (P = 0.007) in the group with less than 25% lysis, when cleavage occurred. The pregnancy and implantation rates for this group were 17.3 and 16.6%. This was not significantly different from unselected two embryo transfers (22 and 12.7%,P = 0.2 and 0.19, respectively). There were 21 twins with dFET (19.6% of pregnancies) and none in sFET. CONCLUSION: Both blastomere lysis and cleavage affect the outcome in sFET. To avoid the risk of twins, sFET should be considered when the embryo shows less than 25% blastomere lysis and at least one blastomere cleaves.     

Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment

A semi-quantitative and non-invasive method for scoring embryosobtained after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been defined,aiming at selection of embryos before transfer and at prognosticevaluation of IVF trials. Grading of embryos observed on theinverted micrclscope was essentially based on the amount ofanucleate fragments expelled during early cteavage and on developmentalspeed. Embryos endowed with a high score were more often associatedwith pregnancy and in particular with the occurrence of maplepregnancy. No difference was observed between scores attributedto embryos related to ongoing, aborted or chankal pmgnades.Average embryonic scores corrrsponding to double and tripletransfers differed significantly in failures as well as pregnancies.The better quality of embryos replaced in triple transfers wasalso apparent from the significantly higher implantation rateper embryo observed in this group. From our results, five criteriaincluding clinical data and embryonic scores can be derivedfor defining a high risk of multiple pregnancy prior to transfer.It might be warranted to replace only two embryos when theseconditions are fulfilled.