Chest pain emergency units.

Each year in the United States, more than 2 million patients are hospitalized with chest pain suggestive of myocardial ischemia, with fewer than 20% of these patients having an acute coronary event. Chest pain emergency units have been created to facilitate urgent therapy for patients with a serious cardiovascular event and to triage lower risk patients to less intensive, more cost-effective inpatient care or discharge to home. The clinical history, physical examination, and initial electrocardiogram are key to initial stratification of patients for further management, but additional methods are necessary to clearly distinguish patients with inconclusive findings at presentation as high- and low-risk. Innovative electrocardiographic methods have increased sensitivity for detecting myocardial ischemia. Accelerated diagnostic protocols with new cardiac serum markers can detect myocardial ischemia or infarction with increasing accuracy. Early echocardiographic, scintigraphic, and treadmill stress protocols can further evaluate patients who have nondiagnostic electrocardiograms and negative serum markers. This review presents the current status of chest pain emergency units and the evolving management strategies they encompass.     

Chest pain units: a modern way of managing patients with chest pain in the emergency department

It is estimated that 5 to 8 million individuals with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia are seen each year in emergency departments (ED) in the United States 1,2, which corresponds to 5 to 10% of all visits 3,4. Most of these patients are hospitalized for evaluation of possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This generates an estimated cost of 3 - 6 thousand dollars per patient 5,6. From this evaluation process, about 1.2 million patients receive the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and just about the same number have unstable angina. Therefore, about one half to two thirds of these patients with chest pain do not have a cardiac cause for their symptoms 2,3. Thus, the emergency physician is faced with the difficult challenge of identifying those with ACS - a life-threatening disease - to treat them properly, and to discharge the others to suitable outpatient investigation and management.     

Acute chest pain in the emergency room. Identification and examination of low-risk patients

Clinical and laboratory data from 596 patients who came to an emergency room complaining of chest pain indicated that no single variable could identify low-risk patients as well as a normal ECG. A combination of three variables--sharp or stabbing pain, no history of angina or myocardial infarction, and pain with pleuritic or positional components or pain that was reproduced by palpation of the chest wall--defined a very-low-risk group in which ECGs did not add accuracy to the evaluation and were potentially misleading; however, only 48 patients (8%) fell into this category. Standard cardiac enzyme levels were of almost no use as an emergency room indicator of myocardial infarction. These findings emphasize the difficulty of identifying patients at low risk for myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the emergency room without consideration of many factors from the history, the physical examination, and the ECG.     

Chest pain in the emergency department: potential role of multidetector CT

The evaluation of patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department remains a significant challenge. The primary goal is to distinguish clinically insignificant etiologies from life-threatening causes such as myocardial ischemia, aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. The conventional evaluation consisting of history, electrocardiography, and biochemical markers is often inconclusive and noninvasive imaging techniques may prove valuable. This article describes some of the available options and focuses on the potential role of CT angiography to assess indeterminate chest pain.     

Chest pain in the emergency room—an interesting case presentation

A 61‐year‐old woman presented to the emergency room with atypical chest pain, non‐diagnostic electrocardiogram, and an initial troponin level that was normal. A coronary computed tomography angio (CCTA) was performed, and on initial review, it appeared to be normal. Subsequent review including evaluation of functional data from the retrospective scan identified a distal left anterior descending occlusion and an apical wall‐motion abnormality with no other evidence of heart disease. This case illustrates the complementary contribution of anatomic and functional data and serves to remind us that on rare occasions, what looks “normal” is not always normal.     

Beat-to-beat morphologic variability of the electrocardiogram for the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency room.

The value of electrocardiographic, morphologic variability in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and myocardial ischemia was evaluated in 49 nonselected patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain. High-resolution electrocardiography was used to determine the morphologic variability of consecutive electrocardiographic complexes, and the ratio of the variance of the QRS onset to that of the entire electrocardiogram was calculated. A final diagnosis of AMI was confirmed in 8 patients, acute coronary insufficiency in 8, angina pectoris in 19, and a noncardiac origin for chest pain in 14. Patients with AMI had a significantly higher beat-to-beat electrocardiographic morphologic variability of the QRS onset (1.4 +/- 0.2) than did those with acute coronary insufficiency (1.1 +/- 0.2), angina pectoris (0.9 +/- 0.1) or noncardiac chest pain (0.8 +/- 0.1) (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of the clinical presentation, typical electrocardiographic changes and creatine phosphokinase levels for the diagnosis of an acute ischemic event on admission to the emergency room was 62, 25 and 37.5%, respectively. Relative variance of the QRS onset of > 0.86 had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 61% for diagnosing an acute ischemic event. Logistic regression of these variables showed that the QRS onset relative variability is an independent predictor for an acute ischemic event. It is concluded that an increased beat-to-beat electrocardiographic variability in patients with AMI is present on admission to the emergency room and may assist in establishing the diagnosis in this setting.     

Acute abdominal pain in geriatric patients evaluated in the emergency room at a third level hospital

"Background: Life expectancy in México has increased in the last decades with a remarkable increase in geriatric population. Acute abdominal pain (AAP) in elderly people compared with young people has different clinical presentation because of the concomitant chronic diseases, the use of medications, history of abdominal surgeries and decrease in perception of pain and immunity. Objective: To know the cause and associated mortality of acute abdominal pain in geriatric patients who attend the emergency room. Methods: Geriatric patients' files with acute abdominal pain admitted from January 2004 to December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gender, presence of chronic diseases, use of medications, history of surgical procedures, definitive diagnosis causative of the symptoms and the associated mortality were recorded. Results: 17 524 patients were admitted, of whom 324 (1.8%) were geriatric patients with AAP: 110 were men (36.9) and 214 were women (66%), with a mean age of 78 years (range 60 to 102 years). The most common causes of AAP were acute cholecystitis in 49 patients (15.1%), irritable bowel syndrome in 42 (12.9%), ulcerative syndrome in 40 (12.3%), intestinal obstruction in 35 (10.8%) and diverticulitis in 23 (10.8%). Nine patients died (2.7%). Conclusions: In our hospital the most common cause of AAP in geriatric patients is related to biliary disease followed by functional gastrointestinal disorder and ulcerative syndrome. Mortality is low."