共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
The control of bubble adhesion underwater is important for various applications, yet the dynamics under flow conditions are still to be unraveled. Herein, we observed the wetting dynamics of an underwater microbubble stream in superwettable channels. The flow of microbubbles was generated by integrating a microfluidic device with an electrochemical system. The microbubble motions were visualized via tracing the flow using a high-speed camera. We show that a vortex is generated in the air layer of the superaerophilic surface under laminar conditions and that the microbubbles are transported on the superaerophilic surface under turbulent conditions driven by the dynamic motion of the air film. Furthermore, microbubbles oscillated backward and forward on the superaerophobic surface under turbulent conditions. This investigation contributes to our understanding of the principles of drag reduction through wettability control and bubble flow.Microbubble flows inside a superwettable channel revealed underwater superwetting phenomena under flow conditions, contributing to the understanding of real-world environmental wetting systems.Nature offers us ideas for the design of materials with superwettability.1 In superwettable systems, the wetting of air underwater has generated interest recently.2–6 For example, penguin feathers are superaerophilic, with an air layer forming on the surface underwater, which allows penguins to swim in the sea with small amounts of drag.2,3 Inspired by this, researchers have theoretically and/or experimentally studied the influence of wettability on drag reduction underwater.4–6 In addition, fish scales are superaerophobic, which offers the idea of designing no-bubble adhesion electrodes that demonstrate high and stable oxygen evolution reaction performance.7,8 However, despite the development of superwettable materials for the controllable adhesion of air and/or bubbles underwater,9 the wetting dynamics of bubbles under flow conditions, which we must consider in real environments, have not been investigated.Herein, we generated microbubble flows parallel to superwettable substrates inside a microfluidic device10,11 and studied the wetting dynamics through integrating an electrochemical setup12 with a microfluidic device, as shown in Fig. 1. The bubbles were formed through the electrolysis of water (see the ESI†). Two platinum plates were used: one as the working electrode and the other as the counter electrode. To increase the electrical conductivity, 2.0 mM K2SO4 was added to the water. The bath water–vapor interfacial tension, γLV, was 71.9 ± 3.6 mN m−1 (n = 15) and the pH of the water was 7.8. We applied a current of ∼0.25 mA cm−2 to generate microbubbles with a diameter of 463.9 ± 245.1 μm (n = 120). The microfluidic device was generated using a 3D printer and connected to a water-flow generator (see the ESI† for the dimensions of the device). The microbubbles generated around the electrodes moved in the direction of the water flow and the coated substrates were placed parallel to the flow.Open in a separate windowFig. 1A schematic illustration of the microfluidic device with an electrochemical setup. We generated a flow of microbubbles and investigated the influences of coating wettability and flow type on the microbubbles dynamics via high speed camera observations. Scale bar: 10 mm.We used the microbubbles as tracers and analyzed their flow as well as that of the water (i.e. microbubble image velocimetry), as shown in Fig. 2. We controlled the Reynolds number, Re = 4Q(πDν)−1 (Q is the flow rate of the water, D is the tube diameter, and ν is the kinetic viscosity of the water). Laminar flow was obtained at Re = 79.21 and turbulent flow was obtained at Re = 396.06 (Fig. 2A). Under laminar flow conditions, the flow speed was nearly constant and the flow direction was close to perpendicular to the substrate (φ ≈ 0, where φ is the angle between the microbubble direction of movement and the width direction of the substrate) in all areas; this behavior was time-independent (Fig. 2B and C). Under turbulent flow conditions, the flow speed was not constant, and the flow direction was unstable (φ fluctuated between −180 and 180°) in all areas. We confirmed that the separation of flow did not occur, at least during the observation period, since the flow direction was parallel to the superwetting microfluidic device.Open in a separate windowFig. 2The flow conditions of the microbubbles. We created laminar and turbulent flows through altering the Reynolds number. (A) Flow velocimetry of the microbubbles under laminar (left) and turbulent (right) flow conditions; scale bar: 10 mm. (B) Velocity and flow direction profiles of microbubbles over the flow area under laminar (left) and turbulent (right) flow conditions. (C) Average velocity and flow direction fluctuations with time under laminar (left) and turbulent (right) flow conditions.We then prepared substrate coatings with superaerophilicity and superaerophobicity. Superaerophilic substrates were fabricated according to our previous study.12 Concisely, a glass plate was dip-coated with a mixture of zinc oxide micro-tetrapod powder for surface roughening and polydimethylsiloxane for aerophilization. Superaerophobic surfaces were prepared through modifying a glass substrate with hydroxy groups using an aqueous potassium hydroxide solution.13 The wettability of the superaerophobic surfaces in relation to bubbles was confirmed via measuring the underwater bubble contact angle (θ); the results are shown in Fig. 3. We calculated the adhesion forces of bubbles, Fadh = πl2γLV(1 + cos θ)/4,14 where l is the bubble–solid adhesion length. On the superaerophilic surface, the adhesion force was 3.2 × 103 μN, and on the superaerophobic surface the force was 4.37 μN for 6 μL bubbles.Open in a separate windowFig. 3Wettability of the coatings. (A) schematic illustration of the measurement of the underwater air contact angle. The contact behavior of 6 μL microbubbles underwater on superaerophilic (B) and superaerophobic (C) surfaces.In Fig. 4, we observed air film formation on superaerophilic surfaces under laminar and turbulent flow conditions. As we have previously shown, when microbubbles are vertically deposited on superaerophilic surfaces, a uniform air layer is formed.10 In the present study, under both laminar and turbulent flow conditions, a uniform air layer formed on the superaerophilic surfaces, but the air layers grew non-uniformly with the deposition of microbubbles owing to Rayleigh–Taylor instability14 (Fig. 4A and B). In all five independent observations, the shape of the air layer was non-uniform; thus, the flow of microbubbles influenced the shape of the air layer. However, bubbles with l = 4–7 mm formed on the surfaces under both laminar and turbulent flow conditions.Open in a separate windowFig. 4Microbubble deposition behavior on a superaerophilic surface under laminar (A) and turbulent (B) flow conditions. The top and bottom parts of the images are the initial and time-aged stages, respectively. (C) The vortex motion of microbubbles on deposited air films under laminar flow conditions. (D) Microbubbles transported on a superaerophilic surface under turbulent conditions driven by the dynamic motion of the air film. (E) and (F) Schematic representations of the microbubble behavior from (C) and (D), respectively. All scale bars: 10 mm.After aging for 1000 s, a continuous air film formed on the superaerophilic surfaces under turbulent conditions. However, the shape was unstable and changed with time (Fig. 4D). In Fig. 4C and E, we observe the formation of a vortex on the hemispherical air film under laminar flow conditions (see Movie S1†). This phenomenon is interesting because under laminar flow conditions a vortex should not be generated (Fig. 2A); this cannot be explained using Bernoulli''s theorem15 and the generation of a vortex suggests the separation of flows, which works to decrease flow resistance at the interface. Vortex generation may be due to the coalescence of microbubbles with the air layer, causing a change in the curvature of the hemispherical air film. This, in turn, would result in a change in the Laplace pressure of 2ΔκγLV, where Δκ is the change in curvature. There is a fluctuation in the vertical force torque to generate the vortex, and the force should be balanced by a Kutta–Joukowski force in the form of 2γLV dκ/dt ≈ ρΓU, where ρ is the density of flows, Γ is the vortex constant, and U is the velocity of the constant laminar flow.16In Fig. 4D and F, we observe that microbubbles on the air film were transported as the shape of the air film dynamically changed to a wave-like nature; however, the microbubbles and air film did not coalesce (see Movie S2†). This indicates that a thin water layer exists between the microbubbles and the air film to prevent coalescence, whereas microbubbles are trapped on the air film by the buoyancy force of the microbubbles, which ≈(Δρ)Ωg, where Δρ is the difference in densities between a bubble and water, Ω is the volume of a microbubble, and g is gravitational acceleration.We then observed the dynamics of the microbubbles on the superaerophobic surfaces (Fig. 5). As we have previously shown, when microbubbles are vertically deposited on superaerophobic surfaces, they are uniformly deposited on the surface and have a spherical shape.12 Under both laminar and turbulent flow conditions, microbubbles were deposited on the superaerophobic surfaces with spherical shapes but with non-uniform deposition (Fig. 5A and B). We then observed the motion of bubbles in contact with the superaerophobic surfaces. Under laminar flow conditions, microbubbles adhering to the surface moved in the direction of the flow (Fig. 5C and Movie S3†). In contrast, turbulent flow conditions caused the microbubbles to oscillate backward and forward (Fig. 5D and Movie S4†). The velocimetry profiles in Fig. 5E and F confirm that the bubble motion is linear in time under laminar flow, but it varies under turbulent flow (with the velocity periodically becoming negative). Despite the periodic negative velocity under turbulent flow conditions, the bubbles go forwards in the flow direction, which is not due to the laminar boundary but because the turbulent flow has more positive components than negative ones. This is because the length of positive motion under turbulent flow conditions increases with the size of the bubbles, obeying Newton''s viscosity law.17 Thus, we confirmed that the motion of bubbles on superaerophobic surfaces is influenced by the flow conditions. The bubble motion distance on superaerophobic surfaces increased with bubble diameter.Open in a separate windowFig. 5Microbubble deposition behavior on a superaerophobic surface under laminar (A) and turbulent conditions (B). The top and bottom parts of the images are the initial and time-aged stages, respectively. (C) Linear motion of the microbubbles on the surface under laminar flow. (D) The oscillating motion of microbubbles on the surface under turbulent flow. (E) Motion distance and (F) velocity analysis of microbubbles under laminar (left) and turbulent (right) conditions for different bubble diameters (2R). All scale bars: 10 mm. 相似文献
2.
TfOH mediated easy access to interesting pyrazolines starting from an aldehyde, phenylhydrazine and styrene has been developed. The scope of this synthetic methodology has been explored by synthesizing various 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazolines in very good yields with very high regioselectivity. The origin of regioselectivity has been explained by comparing the stability of possible intermediate carbocations. The synthetic utility of a green solvent has been explored by synthesizing some of pyrazolines in a DES medium. The synthetic application of the present methodology is employed in the synthesis of a pyrazoline alkaloid.A metal free and green synthetic methodology employing aldehydes, phenylhydrazine and styrene mediated by TfOH has been developed to access 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazolines. The synthetic application of the methodology is demonstrated in the synthesis of a pyrazoline alkaloid.Pyrazoles and pyrazolines are known to exhibit interesting biological and photo-physical behaviours. The biological activities of pyrazoles/pyrazolines have been discussed in several reviews.1–4 A few representative examples of biologically and medicinally important pyrazoles and pyrazolines are given in Fig. 1.5–7 In particular, considerable interest has been focused on 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazoline derivatives due their potential pharmacological activities including (i) antitubercular activity against the H37Rv strain of Mycobacterium,9 (ii) antiproliferative activity,8,10 (iii) antibacterial activity,11–13 (iv) antiobesity effect in an animal model of the potent cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist,14 (v) pre-emergent herbicide activity against various kinds of weeds,15 and (vi) ACE-inhibitory activity with 0.123 mM IC504.16 Pyrazoline derivatives show enhanced biological activity compared with their corresponding pyrazoles.17 In addition, the pyrazoline motif is known to exhibit photo-luminescent behaviour due to intra-molecular charge transfer (ICT) in the excited state and also shows hole transport behaviour.18–24Open in a separate windowFig. 1Representative examples of medicinally important 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazolines and pyrazoles.Various synthetic approaches have been developed to access these biologically important 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazoline/pyrazole compounds.25–28 The most general synthetic approach proceeding via a reaction of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds with arylhydrazines results in poor regioselectivity.3,29,30 A synthetic method which employs appropriate chalcones and arylhydrazines has been considered to be the most widely accepted method for accessing pyrazolines, but this method falls behind due to a greater number of synthetic steps involved.31–34 Recently Wang et al. disclosed a methodology proceeding via a three component [3 + 2] cycloaddition using 20 mol% Cu(OTf)2 at elevated temperature.35 The development of synthetic methodology to prepare active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) would preferably involve (i) high regioselectivity, (ii) diversity in substrates, (iii) the least number of synthetic steps involved and (iv) attaining target compounds, free of metal traces. Hence, a regioselective tandem one-pot intermolecular electrocyclization reaction under metal free condition to access 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazolines would be of great importance.In this regard, we are disclosing a general, metal free and green synthetic methodology to access diverse pyrazoline derivatives with various functionalities including –NO2, –OH and aliphatic groups using arylhydrazines, aldehydes and styrenes. We have obtained the corresponding pyrazoline products in very good yields with enhanced regioselectivity. In addition, we have employed this synthetic methodology in the synthesis of a pyrazoline alkaloid (1,5-diphenyl-3-styryl-2-pyrazoline).In our initial studies to attempt metal free conditions, iodine mediated intermolecular electrocyclization of tolualdehyde 1a, phenylhydrazine 2a and styrene 3 was explored (l-proline, CH(OMe)3, TFA, p-TSA and MeSO3H (Scheme 1).36,37 The use of other solvents such as H2O, DMF, DMSO and ethanol did not result in product formation, as TfOH might be deactivated by these solvents (see ESI, Table S1†).Optimization of reaction conditions in the synthesis of pyrazoline 4aa
Open in a separate windowaA solution of tolualdehyde 1a (1.0 mmol) and phenylhydrazine 2a (1.0 mmol) in solvent (1.0 mL) was treated with additive followed by styrene 3 (1.0 mmol) and stirred.bIsolated yield; ND = not detected.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Origin of regioselectivity in the formation of pyrazoline 4a.We have observed very good regioselectivity in the formation of pyrazolines mediated by TfOH. Mechanistically, the carbocation I-1 can interact with either of the alkenyl carbons in styrene resulting in two types of cationic intermediates: (i) the most stable benzylic carbocation I-2 and (ii) the least stable primary carbocation I-3. The stability of the benzylic carbocation I-2 over the primary carbocation I-3 directs the reaction pathway towards the formation of a 5-phenyl substituted product 4a over a 4-phenyl substituted product 5a (Scheme 1).The scope of this synthetic methodology has been studied by varying the substrates. Both aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes reacted well under the reaction conditions and their corresponding pyrazolines were obtained in yields of up to 86% ( Entry R = Ar = Product Yieldb (%) 1 4-Me–C6H4– 1a C6H5– 2a 4a 82 2 4-MeO–C6H4– 1b C6H5– 2a 4b 73 3 3-MeO–C6H4– 1c C6H5– 2a 4c 57 4 C6H5– 1d C6H5– 2a 4d 63 5 4-Br–C6H4– 1e C6H5– 2a 4e 61 6 4-Cl–C6H4– 1f C6H5– 2a 4f 58 7 4-F–C6H4– 1g C6H5– 2a 4g 39 8 4-NO2–C6H4– 1h C6H5– 2a 4h 24 9 2-NO2–C6H4– 1i C6H5– 2a 4i 45 10 2-HO–C6H4– 1j C6H5– 2a 4j 82 11 CH3CH2CH2– 1k C6H5– 2a 4k 86 12 (CH3)2CH– 1l C6H5– 2a 4l 58 13 4-Me–C6H4– 1a 4-Me–C6H4– 2b 4m 82
Entry | Additive (equiv.) | Solvent | Time (h) | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | I2 (0.2) | CH3CN | 24 | 25 |
2 | I2 (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | 34 |
3 | I2 (1.0) | Toluene | 24 | 40 |
4 | I2 (1.0) | H2O | 24 | 35 |
5 | I2 (1.0) | EtOAc | 24 | Trace |
6 | PhI(OAc)2 (0.2) | CH3CN | 24 | ND |
7 | NaI (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | ND |
8 | NBS (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | ND |
9 | CAN (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | ND |
10 | l-Proline (0.3) | CH3CN | 24 | ND |
11 | CH(OMe)3 (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | ND |
12 | TfOH (1.0) | CH 3 CN | 7 | 82 |
13 | TFA (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | ND |
14 | p-TSA (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | 18 |
15 | MeSO3H (1.0) | CH3CN | 24 | 13 |