Managing deteriorating patients with a physiotherapy critical care outreach service: A mixed-methods study

BackgroundCritical care outreach teams support ward staff to manage patients who are seriously ill or after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Respiratory deterioration is a common reason for (re)admission to the ICU. Physiotherapists are health professionals with skills to address acute respiratory concerns. Experienced respiratory physiotherapists play a role in supporting junior clinicians, particularly in managing deteriorating patients on the ward.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate a novel respiratory physiotherapy critical care outreach–style service. The primary objective was to describe service referrals and the patient cohort. Other objectives were to compare the effects of this model of care on ICU readmission rates to a historical cohort and explore clinician perceptions of the model of care and its implementation.MethodsA new physiotherapy model of care worked alongside an existing nurse-led outreach service to support physiotherapists with the identification and management of patients at risk of respiratory deterioration or ICU (re)admission. Purpose-built and pre-existing databases were used for prospective data collection and for a historical ICU readmissions control group. Questionnaires and semistructured group interviews were utilised to evaluate clinician satisfaction and perceptions.ResultsThe service accepted referrals for 274 patients in 6 months (on average 2.25/working day; commonly after trauma [29%] and abdominal surgery [19%]). During the implementation period of the model of care, fewer preventable respiratory ICU readmissions were reported (n = 1/20) than in the historical cohort (n = 6/19: Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05). Likelihood of respiratory ICU readmission, compared to all-cause readmissions, was not affected (intervention: 31%, historical control: 41%; odds ratio: 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.29 to 1.4]). Postimplementation surveys and focus groups revealed clinicians highly valued the support and perceived a positive impact on patient care.ConclusionsCritical care outreach–style physiotherapy services can be successfully implemented and are positively perceived by clinicians, but any effect on ICU readmissions is unclear.     

Balancing intertwined responsibilities: A grounded theory study of teamwork in everyday intensive care unit practice

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to describe and explain teamwork and factors that influence team processes in everyday practice in an intensive care unit (ICU) from a staff perspective. The setting was a Swedish ICU. Data were collected from 38 ICU staff in focus groups with registered nurses, assistant nurses, and anaesthetists, and in one individual interview with a physiotherapist. Constant comparative analysis according to grounded theory was conducted, and to identify the relations between the emerged categories, the paradigm model was applied. The core category to emerge from the data was “balancing intertwined responsibilities.” In addition, eleven categories that related to the core category emerged. These categories described and explained the phenomenon’s contextual conditions, causal conditions, and intervening conditions, as well as the staff actions/interactions and the consequences that arose. The findings indicated that the type of teamwork fluctuated due to circumstantial factors. Based on the findings and on current literature, strategies that can optimise interprofessional teamwork are presented. The analysis generated a conceptual model, which aims to contribute to existing frameworks by adding new dimensions about perceptions of team processes within an ICU related to staff actions/interactions. This model may be utilised to enhance the understanding of existing contexts and processes when designing and implementing interventions to facilitate teamwork in the pursuit of improving healthcare quality and patient safety.     

Inter-professional nursing education and the roles of swift trust,interaction behaviors,and creativity: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey

BackgroundTechnological advances in medicine have generated an increase in the complexity of delivering quality medical care, which is a challenge to the healthcare system. Improving interdisciplinary teamwork among all healthcare staff is one approach to meeting these new challenges. Interdisciplinary teamwork can be improved through inter-professional teaching in nursing education, which provides instruction from at least two professions to teams of students from different specialties. Behaviors that foster collaboration and creativity in temporary organizations, such as teams, include swift trust, interactive behaviors, and team creativity. A better understanding of the relationships between these behaviors could help educators improve inter-professional education courses for nursing students.MethodA cross-sectional study was conducted with 210 nursing students enrolled in inter-professional education courses with interdisciplinary teams that included design students. Three self-report questionnaires assessed nursing students' perceptions about swift trust, interactive behaviors, and creativity: 1) swift trust measured cognitive-based and affective-based domains; 2) interactive behaviors measured domains of constructive controversy, helping behaviors, and spontaneous communication; and 3) team creativity measured collaborative abilities. Scale scores range from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate more swift trust, better interactive behaviors, and greater team creativity. Analysis with Pearson's correlation coefficient and SPSS PROCESS macro was employed to test the mediating effects.FindingsCognitive-based swift trust was positively correlated with all three domains of interactive behaviors (p < .01); all domains of interactive behaviors were positively associated with team creativity (p < .01). Mediation models indicated that interactive behaviors mediated the relationship between cognitive-based swift trust and team creativity.DiscussionEnhancing cognitive-based swift trust and interactive behaviors in interdisciplinary education for nursing students could promote team creativity. Faculty involved in interdisciplinary education courses for nurses should encourage interactive behaviors, which could increase cognitive-based swift trust among nursing students and improve collaboration and creativity.     

Family physicians’ perspectives on interprofessional teamwork: Findings from a qualitative study

The aim of this study was to describe family physicians’ perspectives of their role in the primary care team and factors that facilitate and hinder teamwork. A qualitative study was conducted employing individual interviews with 19 academic/community-based family physicians who were part of interprofessional primary care teams in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Professional responsibilities and roles of physicians within the team and the facilitators and barriers to teamwork were investigated. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed for emerging themes. The study findings revealed that family physicians consistently perceived themselves as having the leadership role on in the primary care team. Facilitators of teamwork included: communication; trust and respect; defined roles/responsibilities of team members; co-location; task shifting to other health professionals; and appropriate payment mechanisms. Barriers to teamwork included: undefined roles/responsibilities; lack of space; frequent staff turnover; network boundaries; and a culture of power and control. The findings suggest that moving family physicians toward more integrative and interdependent functioning within the primary care team will require overcoming the culture of traditional professional roles, addressing facilitators and barriers to teamwork, and providing training in teamwork.     

Team effectiveness in academic primary health care teams

Primary health care is undergoing significant organizational change, including the development of interdisciplinary health care teams. Understanding how teams function effectively in primary care will assist training programs in teaching effective interprofessional practices. This study aimed to explore the views of members of primary health care teams regarding what constitutes a team, team effectiveness and the factors that affect team effectiveness in primary care. Focus group consultations from six teams in the Department of Family Medicine at Queen's University were recorded and transcribed and qualitative analysis was used to identify themes. Twelve themes were identified that related to the impact of dual goals/obligations of education and clinical/patient practice on team relationships and learners; the challenges of determining team membership including nonattendance of allied health professionals except nurses; and facilitators and barriers to effective team function. This study provides insight into some of the challenges of developing effective primary care teams in an academic department of family medicine. Clear goals and attention to teamwork at all levels of collaboration is needed if effective interprofessional education is to be achieved. Future research should clarify how best to support the changes required for increasingly effective teamwork.     

Sustainable interprofessional teamwork needs a team-friendly healthcare system: Experiences from a collaborative Dutch programme

ABSTRACT

The significance of effective interprofessional teamwork to improve the quality of care has been widely recognised. Effective interprofessional teamwork calls on good collaboration between professionals and patients, coordination between professionals, and the development of teamwork over time. Effective development of teams also requires support from the wider organisational context. In a Dutch village, healthcare professionals work closely together, and mutual consultations as well as interprofessional meetings take place on a regular basis. The network was created as a precondition for sustainable interprofessional teamwork in elderly care. However, several external barriers were experienced regarding the supportive structure and cooperative attitude of the healthcare insurer and municipality. The aim of the article is to examine these experience-based issues regarding internal organisation, perspective, and definition of effective teamwork. Complicating factors refer to finding the right key figures, and the different perspectives on team development and team effectiveness. Our conclusion is that the organisation of healthcare insurance companies needs to implement fundamental changes to facilitate an interprofessional care approach. Furthermore, municipalities should work on their vision of the needs and benefits of a fruitful collaboration with interprofessional healthcare teams. The challenge for healthcare teams is to learn to speak the language of external partners. To support the development of interprofessional teams, external parties need to recognise and trust in a shared aim to provide quality of care in an efficient and effective way.     

Teamwork and social cohesion are key: Nurses' perceptions and experiences of working in a new decentralised intensive care unit

BackgroundDecentralised nursing stations (DCNs) have gained popularity in new hospital designs owing to their positive impact on patient safety. However, the impact on the nurses' working environment and on continuity and quality of patient care is limited.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to describe nurses' perceptions and experiences of the working environment and of patient care in a decentralised intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsTwelve months after the establishment of the new decentralised ICU in a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, a prospective cross-sectional survey of registered nurses working in the unit was undertaken. Nurses' perceptions and experiences of the working environment and patient care were evaluated using a 56-item questionnaire comprising nine domains and optional open-ended comments. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS, version 25. Qualitative data were used to enhance the quantitative data.ResultsA total of 128 nurses responded to the questionnaire. The mean scores for overall job satisfaction, nursing teamwork, social cohesion, continuity of patient care, and quality of patient care were 3.02 (±0.91), 2.78 (±1.05), 2.68 (1.02), 2.60 (±1.01), and 3.48 (±0.88), respectively, for a maximum obtainable score of 5. Overall mean scores for teamwork, social cohesion, and continuity of patient care were explained by nurses to be a direct result of the physical layout of the new DCN ICU. Nurses believed this influenced their ability to interact with other staff and impacted teamwork and social cohesion and in turn reflected in their current job satisfaction.ConclusionsImplementation of a new model of nursing care, whereby staff members are rostered together in a pod for a period of time, along with team-building exercises, is recommended to improve the social cohesion and teamwork within the DCN ICU. Further research on nurses' experiences within a DCN ICU is required to produce robust evidence and generalisability.     

Evaluation of interprofessional relational coordination and patients’ perception of care in outpatient oncology teams

ABSTRACT

This pilot study was designed to measure teamwork and the relationship of teamwork to patient perceptions of care among 63 members of 12 oncology teams at a Cancer Centre in the Midwest. Lack of teamwork in cancer care can result in serious clinical errors, fragmentation of care, and poor quality of care. Many oncology team members, highly skilled in clinical care, are not trained to work effectively as members of a care team. The research team administered the Relational Coordination survey to core oncology team members—medical oncologists, nurse coordinators, and clinical secretaries—to measure seven dimensions of team skills (four relating to communication [frequency, timeliness, accuracy, and problem solving] and three relating to relationship [shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect]) averaged to create a Relational Coordination Index. The results indicated that among the team member roles, nurse coordinator relational coordination indices were the strongest and most positively correlated with patient perception of care. Statistically significant correlations were intra-nurse coordinator relational coordination indices and two patient perception of care factors (information and education and patient’s preferences). All other nurse coordinator intra-role as well as inter-role correlations were also positively correlated, although not statistically significant.     

Integrating physiotherapists within primary health care teams: perspectives of family physicians and nurse practitioners

Abstract

The international literature suggests a number of benefits related to integrating physiotherapists into primary health care (PHC) teams. Considering the mandate of PHC teams in Canada, emphasizing healthy living and chronic disease management, a broad range of providers, inclusive of physiotherapists is required. However, physiotherapists are only sparsely integrated into these teams. This study explores the perspectives of “core” PHC team members, family physicians and nurse practitioners, regarding the integration of physiotherapists within Ontario (Canada) PHC teams. Twenty individual semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and then analyzed following an iterative process drawing from an interpretive phenomenological approach. Five key themes emerged which highlighted “how physiotherapists could and do contribute as team members within PHC teams particularly related to musculoskeletal health and chronic disease management”. The perceived value of physiotherapists within Ontario, Canada PHC teams was a unanimous sentiment particularly in terms of musculoskeletal health, chronic disease management and maximizing health human resources efficiency to ensure the right care, is delivered by the right practitioner, at the right time.     

The impact of team processes on psychiatric case management

Title. The impact of team processes on psychiatric case management Aim. This paper is a report of a study to identify the structures and interactions within community mental health teams that facilitate or impede effective teamwork and psychiatric case management. Background. Effective case management requires close collaboration between case managers or care co‐ordinators and other members of the multidisciplinary mental health team, yet there has been little research into this relationship. Method. A multiple case study of seven United Kingdom community mental health teams was conducted between 1999 and 2001, using qualitative methods of participant observation, semi‐structured interviews and document review. Findings. Factors were identified that impacted on the ability of care co‐ordinators to act effectively: ‘structure and procedures’; ‘disrespect and withdrawal’; ‘humour and undermining’; ‘safety and disclosure’. Care co‐ordination was enhanced when team structures and policies were in place and where team interactions were respectful. Where members felt disrespected or undermined, communication, information sharing and collaboration were impaired, with a negative impact on the care provided to service users. Conclusions. Teams require clear operating procedures alongside interprofessional trust and respect to ensure that there is open, safe and reflective participation. Further research is required to identify how best to bring about collaborative, effective teamwork in mental healthcare.     

The link between teamwork and patients' outcomes in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Links between teamwork and outcomes have been established in a number of fields. Investigations into this link in healthcare have yielded equivocal results. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the level of self-identified teamwork in the intensive care unit and patients' outcomes. METHOD: A total of 394 staff members of 17 intensive care units completed the Group Development Questionnaire and a demographic survey. The questionnaire is a reliable and valid measure of team development and effectiveness. Each unit's predicted and actual mortality rates for the month in which data were collected were obtained. Pearson product moment correlations and analyses of variance were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Staff members of units with mortality rates that were lower than predicted perceived their teams as functioning at higher stages of group development. They perceived their team members as less dependent and more trusting than did staff members of units with mortality rates that were higher than predicted. Staff members of high-performing units also perceived their teams as more structured and organized than did staff members of lower-performing units. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study and other establish a link between teamwork and patients' outcomes in intensive care units. The evidence is sufficient to warrant the implementation of strategies designed to improve the level of teamwork and collaboration among staff members in intensive care units.     

Collaboration in Health Care

Health care involves the participation of patients, family, and a diverse team of often highly specialized health care professionals. Involvement of all these team members in a cooperative and coordinated way is essential to providing exceptional care. This article introduces key concepts relating to interprofessional collaborative teamwork. Approaches to measuring and studying collaboration and evidence demonstrating the benefits of collaboration are presented. The structural, psychological, and educational factors which may determine collaborative behaviour are described.Learning ObjectivesBy the end of this CME article, participants will be able to1. Distinguish between multifunctional and interdisciplinary teams,2. Define collaboration in a health care setting,3. Describe the value of collaboration to patients, staff, and organizations,4. Understand approaches to measuring collaboration, and5. Identify factors that determine the ability of teams to collaborate.This article is a CME article and provides the equivalent of 2 hours of continuing education that may be applied to your professional development credit system. A 20-question multiple choice quiz follows this reading, and answers can be found on page 216. Please note that no formalized credit (Category A) is available from CAMRT.     

Nurses' perceptions of multidisciplinary team work in acute health-care

Multidisciplinary teamwork is viewed as one of the key processes through which care is managed in the British National Health Service, and yet is often viewed as one of the most problematic. Working in a multidisciplinary team requires many skills, which involves understanding not only one's own role but also the role of other professionals. The aim of this study was to explore nurses' perceptions of multidisciplinary teamwork in acute health-care. Nineteen nurses were interviewed using the critical incident approach to obtain their perceptions of multidisciplinary teamwork. Direct observation was conducted to record interactions between nurses and health-care professionals in multidisciplinary teams. In total, 14 meetings were attended in elder care and orthopaedics and seven in acute medicine. The findings of this study identified three barriers that hindered teamwork: (i) differing perceptions of teamwork; (ii) different levels of skills acquisitions to function as a team member; and (iii) the dominance of medical power that influenced interaction in teams. Thus, education establishments and nursing managers need to ensure that the acquisition of team-playing skills is an integral part of continued professional development.     

Barriers to rehabilitation after critical illness: a survey of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals caring for ICU survivors in an acute care hospital

BackgroundThere is scant literature on the barriers to rehabilitation for patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) to acute care wards.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to assess ward-based rehabilitation practices and barriers and assess knowledge and perceptions of ward clinicians regarding health concerns of ICU survivors.Methods, design, setting, and participantsThis was a single-centre survey of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals caring for ICU survivors in an Australian tertiary teaching hospital.Main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were knowledge of post–intensive care syndrome (PICS) amongst ward clinicians, perceptions of ongoing health concerns with current rehabilitation practices, and barriers to inpatient rehabilitation for ICU survivors.ResultsThe overall survey response rate was 35% (198/573 potential staff). Most respondents (66%, 126/190) were unfamiliar with the term PICS. A majority of the respondents perceived new-onset physical weakness, sleep disturbances, and delirium as common health concerns amongst ICU survivors on acute care wards. There were multifaceted barriers to patient mobilisation, with inadequate multidisciplinary staffing, lack of medical order for mobilisation, and inadequate physical space near the bed as common institutional barriers and patient frailty and cardiovascular instability as the commonly perceived patient-related barriers. A majority of the surveyed ward clinicians (66%, 115/173) would value education on health concerns of ICU survivors to provide better patient care.ConclusionThere are multiple potentially modifiable barriers to the ongoing rehabilitation of ICU survivors in an acute care hospital. Addressing these barriers may have benefits for the ongoing care of ICU survivors.     

Team type,team maturity and team effectiveness in specialist palliative home care: an exploratory questionnaire study

ABSTRACT

To meet complex needs in persons and families within specialist palliative care, care team members are expected to work together in performing a comprehensive assessment of patient needs. Team type (how integrated team members work) and team maturity (group development) have been identified as components in team effectiveness and productivity. The aim of the study reported in this paper was to identify team types in specialist palliative care in Sweden, and to explore associations between team type, team maturity and team effectiveness in home care teams. A national web-based survey of team types, based on Thylefors questionnaire, and a survey of healthcare professionals using the Group Development Questionnaire (GDQ-SE3) to assess team developmental phase, effectiveness and productivity were used in an exploratory cross-sectional design. The participants were: Specialist palliative care teams in Sweden registered in the Palliative Care Directory (n = 77), and members of 11 specialist palliative home care teams. Teams comprised physicians, registered nurses, social workers, physiotherapists and/or occupational therapists, full-or part-time. Our national web survey results showed that the 77 investigated teams had existed from 7 to 21 years, were foremost of medium size and functioned as inter- or transprofessional teams. Results from the 61 HCPs, representing 11 teams, indicated that more mature teams tended to work in an integrated manner, rather than in parallel. The effectiveness ratio varied from 52% to 86% in teams. Recommendations arising from our findings include the need for clarification of team goals and professional roles together with prioritizing the development of desirable psychosocial traits and team processes in clinical settings.     

Factors Affecting the Involvement of Day Centre Care Staff in the Delivery of Physiotherapy to Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study in One London Borough

Background Physiotherapists for adults with intellectual disabilities often work in day centres, relying on care staff to support programmes. This study investigates factors affecting physiotherapy delivery in 4 day centres in one London borough. Materials and Method Semi‐structured interviews were carried out with day centre care staff, managers and physiotherapists. Results Service users’ needs were reported not to be met at three of the four centres. Barriers included low staffing levels, high absences and use of agency staff. Relevant variables included level of physiotherapist attendance, management priorities for care staff time, care staff confidence and whether a consistent team support delivery. Discrepancies emerged between staff and physiotherapists’ views on training needs. Conclusions Physiotherapy delivered in day centres is an important part of a complex care package. It requires effective multiagency working to meet the known – and potentially unidentified – needs of individuals and to ensure that care staff are adequately supported.     

Physiotherapy services in intensive care. A workforce survey of Australia and New Zealand

BackgroundIn Australia and New Zealand, there are currently no recommendations to guide staffing levels for intensive care unit (ICU) physiotherapy services, and there is limited information about the current services provided.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to document the profile of intensive care physiotherapy services currently offered in Australia and New Zealand.MethodsA binational survey was distributed to physiotherapists. The survey sought information on staffing and service profiles for weekday, weekend, and after-hour services including on-call and evening shifts.ResultsEighty-six sites completed the survey, with responses primarily from Level 3 (47/86, 55%) and public ICUs (74/86, 86%). For weekday services, the ratio of full-time equivalent physiotherapy staff allocated per bed was similar between all intensive care levels (0.11 [0.08–0.15], p = 0.421). Thirty respondents (35%) were satisfied with their staffing and reported higher levels of physiotherapy staff per bed (0.15 [0.1–0.2], p < 0.001). Most sites reported lower levels of staffing for weekend services (76/86, 88%), and many physiotherapists indicated that they were not satisfied with this service (55/86, 64%). Most Level 2, Level 3, and paediatric ICUs had a designated senior physiotherapist, with similar levels of senior physiotherapy staff allocated per bed between all ICU levels (0.05 [0.03–0.08], p = 0.844). Few sites reported dedicated staff attributed to intensive care education, research, tracheostomy service, or outreach roles. On-call physiotherapy services were available in 49 of 86 (57%) hospitals surveyed; however, utilisation of the service by ICUs was mainly reported to be less than once per month (19/49, 39%).ConclusionsPhysiotherapy staffing ratios were similar across different ICU levels. While weekend services are available for most ICUs, staffing levels are reduced. Higher staffing ratios were associated with higher levels of satisfaction to complete professional roles and responsibilities.     

Team functioning in hospice interprofessional meetings: An exploratory study of providers’ perspectives

Interprofessional collaboration is the foundation of hospice service delivery. In the United States, hospice agencies are required to regularly convene interprofessional meetings during which teams review plans of care for the patients and families they serve. A small body of research suggests that team functioning could be significantly enhanced in hospice interprofessional meetings; however, systematic investigation of this possibility has been limited to date. The purpose of this qualitative study was to better understand the experiences and perspectives of hospice providers who regularly participate in interprofessional meetings as a first step toward improving teamwork in this setting. We interviewed 24 hospice providers and conducted a template analysis of qualitative data to identify barriers and facilitators to effective team functioning in interprofessional meetings. Participants recognised the ways meetings supported high-quality, holistic patient and family care but voiced frustrations over meeting inefficiencies, particularly in light of caseloads they perceived as overly demanding. Time constraints were often viewed as prohibiting the inclusion of interprofessional content and full participation of all team members. Findings suggest that modifications to interprofessional meetings such as standardising processes may enhance meeting efficiency and team functioning.     

The effectiveness of a nurse practitioner-led pain management team in long-term care: A mixed methods study

BackgroundConsidering the high rates of pain as well as its under-management in long-term care (LTC) settings, research is needed to explore innovations in pain management that take into account limited resource realities. It has been suggested that nurse practitioners, working within an inter-professional model, could potentially address the under-management of pain in LTC.ObjectivesThis study evaluated the effectiveness of implementing a nurse practitioner-led, inter-professional pain management team in LTC in improving (a) pain-related resident outcomes; (b) clinical practice behaviours (e.g., documentation of pain assessments, use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions); and, (c) quality of pain medication prescribing practices.MethodsA mixed method design was used to evaluate a nurse practitioner-led pain management team, including both a quantitative and qualitative component. Using a controlled before-after study, six LTC homes were allocated to one of three groups: 1) a nurse practitioner-led pain team (full intervention); 2) nurse practitioner but no pain management team (partial intervention); or, 3) no nurse practitioner, no pain management team (control group). In total, 345 LTC residents were recruited to participate in the study; 139 residents for the full intervention group, 108 for the partial intervention group, and 98 residents for the control group. Data was collected in Canada from 2010 to 2012.ResultsImplementing a nurse practitioner-led pain team in LTC significantly reduced residents' pain and improved functional status compared to usual care without access to a nurse practitioner. Positive changes in clinical practice behaviours (e.g., assessing pain, developing care plans related to pain management, documenting effectiveness of pain interventions) occurred over the intervention period for both the nurse practitioner-led pain team and nurse practitioner-only groups; these changes did not occur to the same extent, if at all, in the control group. Qualitative analysis highlighted the perceived benefits of LTC staff about having access to a nurse practitioner and benefits of the pain team, along with barriers to managing pain in LTC.ConclusionsThe findings from this study showed that implementing a nurse practitioner-led pain team can significantly improve resident pain and functional status as well as clinical practice behaviours of LTC staff. LTC homes should employ a nurse practitioner, ideally located onsite as opposed to an offsite consultative role, to enhance inter-professional collaboration and facilitate more consistent and timely access to pain management.