Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.     

Phase II evaluation of 3-day topotecan with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a 3-day topotecan administration schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent measurable ovarian cancer who had up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for the management of their disease participating in this phase II trial were to receive topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days in combination with cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m(2) on Day 1 every 21 days. Dose escalation and reductions were permitted. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (median age = 65; range 37-84) were treated with this combination regimen. Seventeen were platinum-sensitive and 19 were platinum-resistant. A total of 169 cycles of chemotherapy was administered (median = 4; range 1-10). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (68.6%), neutropenic fever (7.1%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (18.3%), and requirement for blood transfusion (19.5%). Dose escalation was possible in 3 (8.3%), and dose reduction was required in 14 (38.9%) patients. Overall response rate was 25 and 44.5% stable disease. Median progression-free interval and overall survival was 5.4 and 23.5 months, respectively, independent of platinum sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The 3-day topotecan schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide appears to have good activity in recurrent ovarian cancer regardless of platinum sensitivity. Neutropenia was the only severe toxicity and was less prevalent than other reported trials of topotecan. This tolerable regimen offers patients more convenience and appears to have moderate activity.     

Phase II evaluation of 24-h continuous infusion topotecan in recurrent, potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop an alternative effective and more convenient administration schedule for intravenous topotecan when used as palliative treatment in ovarian cancer. METHODS: The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of 24-h infusional topotecan (8.5 mg/m(2)) with treatment repeated every 3 weeks in 29 patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (prior response to platinum-based chemotherapy with a minimum treatment-free interval >/=6 months). RESULTS: The major toxicities of therapy were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia which developed in 86 and 14% of patients, respectively. Other severe side effects were uncommon. Only 2 partial responses (7%) were observed in the 28 patients evaluable for response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively favorable ovarian cancer patient population treated in this trial (platinum-sensitive recurrent disease), the response rate was disappointingly low. Considering the three- to fivefold higher objective response rates observed in other trials employing topotecan in individuals with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer utilizing a 5-day treatment program (delivered every 3 weeks), the results of the current study provide strong support for the conclusion that clinically relevant antineoplastic activity of this agent is highly schedule dependent.     

Weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: The records of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan after failure of > or =1 prior regimen were reviewed. Patients received topotecan (median starting dose approximately 2.5 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Antitumor response was assessed after 2 cycles by serial CA-125 levels. RESULTS: Thirty-five heavily pretreated patients received a mean of 5 cycles of topotecan (range, 1-13 cycles). Thirty-two patients had definable platinum sensitivity (16 sensitive, 8 resistant, 8 refractory). Median age was 56 years. A total of 177 cycles (534 weeks) of topotecan was administered. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, and no grade 4 toxicities were observed. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity, including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, was observed in 2, 2, 1, and 0 patients, respectively. No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Based on serial CA-125 measurements, there were 1 (3%) complete and 5 (15%) partial responses, with 1 of the partial responses in a patient with platinum-refractory disease. Stable disease was reported in 13 (38%) patients, including 5 patients with platinum-resistant/refractory disease. CONCLUSION: Weekly topotecan demonstrates activity and is well tolerated compared with historical data with the standard 5-day schedule. Higher doses may be warranted because of the high tolerability shown for weekly topotecan. Weekly topotecan may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, especially heavily pretreated patients who might require dosing schedules with improved tolerability.     

Phase 2 trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and irinotecan in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers

OBJECTIVE: Our goal in this nonrandomized phase 2 trial was to evaluate the toxicity and obtain preliminary data on the potential efficacy of a novel three-drug combination regimen (carboplatin-paclitaxel-irinotecan) when employed as initial therapy of advanced ovarian cancer or as second-line treatment in the setting of a prolonged (>or=12 months) treatment-free interval. METHODS: Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer, primary adenocarcinoma of the peritoneum, or fallopian tube cancer were enrolled in the study. Patients received carboplatin (AUC 5), paclitaxel (150 mg/m(2) over 3 h), and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2) over 90 min). The three-drug combination was initially administered on an every 21-day schedule, but due to toxicity was subsequently changed to a 28-day program. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled into this phase 2 trial. Twenty-three patients were chemotherapy naive, while 7 had received prior chemotherapy. Seventeen patients completed all six cycles of treatment. Eight patients (27%) were removed from the study after a median of three cycles due to toxicities. Seventeen patients (57%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia, with three individuals requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever and dehydration. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were experienced by three patients each. The principal nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea (grade 3: three patients) and fatigue. The overall objective clinical response rate was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin-paclitaxel-irinotecan can be administered to women with advanced ovarian cancer with significant, but overall acceptable toxicity. Modification of the regimen from a 3-week to a 4-week schedule permits a greater percentage of patients to complete the program without experiencing excessive toxicity. The overall objective response rate observed in this trial is comparable to other combination regimens employed in this setting. Defining a place for this three-drug program in the standard management of ovarian cancer will require the conduct of an appropriately designed randomized trial.     

Phase 2 trial of single agent docetaxel in platinum and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum

OBJECTIVE: Previously reported data have suggested the lack of complete cross-resistance between docetaxel and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. We wished to evaluate the biological and clinical activity of docetaxel in a patient population with well-characterized platinum and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: In this single-institution phase 2 trial, 30 women with advanced ovarian cancer whose disease had either failed to respond to primary platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy or where the cancer had progressed within 3 months of their last treatment with both a platinum agent and paclitaxel were treated with single agent docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) q 3 weeks). Due to a prior history of excessive chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, 3 patients initiated treatment at a dose of 60 mg/m(2). RESULTS: The median number of courses of docetaxel delivered on this protocol was 3 (range 1-7), with 7 patients requiring dose reductions due to treatment-related side effects. The most common toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and grade >/=2 fatigue experienced by 9 (30%), 2 (7%), 5 (17%) patients, respectively. Three patients (10%) achieved both an objective response (by CA-125 criteria) and symptomatic improvement (e.g., decrease in pain and ascites). The durations of responses were 3, 4, and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Single-agent docetaxel has modest, but definite activity in patients with well-characterized platinum and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Use of this drug should be considered a rational management approach in appropriately selected patients in this clinical setting.     

Phase 2 trial of single-agent gemcitabine in platinum-paclitaxel refractory ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: There is a need to find agents with activity in platinum and taxane refractory ovarian cancer to be employed as second-line therapy in the malignancy. Limited clinical trial experience has suggested that gemcitabine possesses activity in this clinical setting. We wished to further define the level of activity of gemcitabine in women with well-characterized platinum/taxane refractory disease. METHODS: Patients with ovarian or fallopian tube cancer or primary carcinoma of the peritoneum, whose disease had either failed to respond to a platinum and taxane treatment, or had responded but the "treatment free interval (TFI)" was < or =3 months, or if the TFI was >3 months and they had been retreated with the agents and not responded (or experienced a TFI of <3 months), were eligible for treatment on this phase 2 single institution protocol. Gemcitabine was administered weekly (as a 1-h infusion) for 3 weeks, followed by 1-week break. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were treated on this trial. The initial dose level (1250 mg/m(2)/week) resulted in excessive toxicity (fatigue, fever/chills, bone marrow suppression). The modified starting dose (1000 mg/m(2)/week) resulted in a more acceptable side effect profile. Eight patients (16%) with measurable disease (n = 4) or evaluable disease by CA-125 criteria (n = 4) achieved an objective response (median duration of response: 4 months; range 2-13 months). CONCLUSION: Single agent gemcitabine possesses modest, but definite, activity in patients with well-characterized platinum/taxane resistant ovarian cancer. It is reasonable to consider this drug for second-line (or later) treatment in this clinical setting.     

A dose-escalating study of weekly bolus topotecan in previously treated ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan is an established topoisomerase I inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer. Myelotoxicity and suboptimal patient convenience associated with daily topotecan, however, have prompted investigators to explore alternate regimens, including a weekly regimen of topotecan. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given as a weekly bolus in previously treated ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Second- and third-line ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease or elevated cancer antigen 125 received weekly bolus topotecan intravenously starting at 1.5 mg/m(2). Topotecan was escalated in dose increments of 0.5 mg/m(2) every 21 days as tolerability allowed. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 patients were evaluable for safety and tolerability. No notable toxicity was observed with weekly topotecan doses < 4 mg/m(2). Additionally, there was an absence of dose-limiting myelotoxicity and thrombocytopenia with weekly topotecan. The MTD of weekly topotecan without the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was 4 mg/m(2), with grade 2 anemia, chronic fatigue, and grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity limiting further dose escalation. Weekly topotecan also demonstrated antitumor activity at doses >2 mg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a well-tolerated, weekly regimen of topotecan (4 mg/m(2), with a maximum recommended dose of 6 mg/m(2)) provides the basis for further investigation in phase II studies of single-agent and combination regimens in previously treated ovarian cancer patients.     

A phase I study of weekly topotecan and Paclitaxel in previously treated epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients

OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported on the feasibility of weekly topotecan as single-agent therapy in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bolus intravenous (IV) topotecan combined with weekly paclitaxel in a comparable patient population. METHODS: Previously treated ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease and/or elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) received (as second-line or third-line therapy) weekly 30-min bolus IV topotecan starting at 2 mg/m(2) combined with weekly paclitaxel starting at a dose of 60 mg/m(2). In this intrapatient dose-escalation study, topotecan and paclitaxel were escalated in parallel until the MTD was reached, defined as the first dose level at which >or= 2 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 26 patients were evaluable for toxicity and received a total of 306 weeks of therapy (median, 13 weeks; range, 5 to 33 weeks). No significant dose-limiting toxicity was observed up to a weekly bolus IV topotecan dose of 3 mg/m(2) and a concurrent paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2). The MTD was topotecan 3.5 mg/m(2) plus 90 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicities included anemia and fatigue, with 10 of 21 patients receiving epoetin alfa for grade 3 or 4 anemia; only 1 patient required a blood transfusion. Two patients had a treatment delay of at least 1 week and only 1 patient required a dose reduction to maintain the weekly schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, the recommended initial dose for this novel regimen is topotecan 3 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). Further investigation of the efficacy of weekly topotecan plus paclitaxel in less heavily pretreated patients is warranted.     

A phase II trial of weekly topotecan for patients with secondary platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma following the failure of second-line therapy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate, progression-free survival and toxicity associated with weekly topotecan administered to patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC) in the third-line setting. METHODS: Patients with measurable platinum-sensitive EOC following failure of second-line chemotherapy were eligible for this phase II study. All patients were initially treated with cytoreductive surgery and platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Continuous, weekly topotecan was administered at a starting dose of 4 mg/m(2). Toxicity and efficacy were assessed at various time points after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: Twenty nine patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Toxicity was acceptable with grade 1/2 nausea being the most commonly experienced side effect (52%). Nine patients (31%) had grade 3/4 leukopenia; however, only 3 patients had febrile neutropenia. Thirteen patients had a treatment delay and six required dose reductions. Twenty two patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate for weekly topotecan was 13.6% [95% CI; -0.7-27.9%] with 1 complete response, and 2 partial responses. Twelve patients (54.5%), including 2 with minor responses, had stable disease for a median duration of 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan at the current schedule in the third-line setting in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC has modest clinical activity. Toxicity associated with this regimen is acceptable but growth factor support, dose reductions, or schedule alterations may need to be considered in many of these patients.     

Prolonged topotecan infusion with cisplatin in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: an NYGOG and ECOG study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the toxicity and efficacy of combined therapy with cisplatin and prolonged infusion topotecan as front line therapy in women with epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with previously untreated, measurable and non-measurable epithelial ovarian cancer, stages Ic-IV were eligible. Patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by topotecan 0.3 to 0.4 mg/m(2)/day given as a continuous infusion over 14-21 days, every 28 days. Dose levels and duration of infusion were adjusted for toxicity as appropriate. Patients were evaluated for response to treatment and treatment toxicity by standard NYGOG criteria. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. Among the 20 patients with post-surgical residual disease >2 cm, 80% [95% CI (56.3%, 94.3%)] demonstrated an objective response to therapy. The median progression-free survival for all 60 patients enrolled was 19.3 months with a median overall survival of 45.6 months given the median follow-up of 55 months (range 6-81 months). Five year survival is estimated to be 41%. Toxicity was observed in the first four patients treated with topotecan (0.4 mg/m(2)/day x 21 days) and dosing was continued at 0.3 mg/m(2)/day x 14 days thereafter. Of the 56 patients treated at the amended dose level, marrow suppression continued to be dose-limiting, with 86% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 55% experiencing grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and 50% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 anemia. Nonetheless, only 11/245 cycles administered were associated with febrile neutropenia and/or infection (8 port-related). Other non-hematologic toxicity was as expected. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: This large, multicenter phase II study of prolonged infusion topotecan in combination with cisplatin demonstrated similar response, time to progression and survival compared with reported results of taxane and platinum combinations. Hematologic toxicity was greater but tolerated. Further studies investigating topotecan in combination with platinum therapy as a first line agent are warranted.     

Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE: In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16). RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION: When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.     

A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion in patients with platinum-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND: As suggested by preclinical trials, prolonged administration of topotecan, a reversible inhibitor of topoisomerase-I, may have a therapeutic advantage. Following a phase I trial of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion, we performed a phase II trial utilizing this schedule in ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Eligibility included platinum-/paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, measurable disease, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. A dose of 2.0 mg/m(2) of topotecan was administered as a 72-h infusion weekly via an ambulatory pump. Plasma topotecan concentrations were determined prior to and at the completion of each weekly course. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were entered and 23 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Two hundred eighteen weekly courses of therapy were administered (median 7 weeks, range 4-46 weeks). Toxicity was mild with grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia occurring in 13, 13, and 17% of patients, respectively. Two of 23 patients (9.1%) (CI 1-28%) had partial responses of 2 and 3 months' duration and 6 had stable disease. Steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations were a median of 1.2 ng/ml (range 0.4-8.00 ng/ml) following the first week of infusion. Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were highest in 2 patients with partial responses. Mean steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were 4.6, 2.0, and 1.3 ng/ml for partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. An analysis of variance of steady state plasma topotecan concentrations after the first week of infusion over all administered cycles demonstrated a significant difference in steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations between patients with partial response and stable disease and between partial response and no response (significant at the 0.05 level after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Controlling for cycle number, steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are significantly greater for patients with responding or stable disease than those with progressive disease (P = 0.0003) and have a lower bound of > or = 1.9 ng/ml (95% confidence level). CONCLUSION: Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are associated with responding or stable disease in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Steady state topotecan concentrations could potentially be utilized to modify tumor exposure and response.     

Lack of efficacy of 24-h infusional topotecan in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule in the second-line treatment of advanced platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of 24-h infusional topotecan (8.5 mg/m(2)), repeated every 3 weeks in 26 patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer (failure to respond to initial platinum-based treatment or development of recurrent disease within 6 months of completion of chemotherapy). RESULTS: Grade 4 neutropenia (85% of patients) and thrombocytopenia (12%) were the major toxicities encountered. Of the 25 patients evaluable for response, only a single patient experienced an objective response (4%). CONCLUSIONS: When employed at this dose and schedule (24-h infusion every 3 weeks), topotecan has minimal second-line activity in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.     

A phase I trial of a 3-day topotecan Q 21 days for recurrent epithelial cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum

OBJECTIVE: This trial was undertaken to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan that can be administered for 3 days q 21 days. A 3-day schedule is more convenient and less expensive than standard 5-day dosing. METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovary, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma were treated with escalating doses of topotecan beginning at 2.50 mg/m(2) as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Colony stimulating factors were not employed prophylactically, but could be added for grade 4 marrow toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a median age of 61 (range 46-80) and performance status of 0 or 1 were entered. All patients had received at least one prior paclitaxel/platinum regimen; 6 had received two. Ninety-one cycles were delivered (median = 6) and 98.9% were on schedule. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 17 of 20 patients (85%) in cycle 1 and in 38 of 91 (41.8%) total cycles. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) started G-CSF on cycle 2. Two of 91 (2.2%) cycles had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Four cycles (4.4%) were associated with febrile neutropenia. Two patients experienced grade 4 neurotoxicity (DLT) at 4.25 mg/m(2). Other nonhematologic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan can be safely administered on schedule as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Neurotoxicity was the DLT when G-CSF was added; the MTD was 3.75 mg/m(2). There was minimal other nonhematologic toxicity. Neutropenia was predictable and easily managed with G-CSF. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon and thrombocytopenia was rare at the doses evaluated.     

A phase I trial of oxaliplatin and topotecan in recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Oxaliplatin and topotecan have demonstrated activity as single agents against recurrent platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer, as well as synergy in vitro. This was a dose-finding study of combination therapy with weekly topotecan and alternating-week oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had a diagnosis of recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, a performance status of 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. On days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) via intravenous infusion. On days 1, 8, and 15, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous topotecan (2.0-4.0 mg/m2). Five dose levels were planned with a minimum cohort of 3 patients at each level. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled and received a total of 50 cycles of chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and 3.0 mg/m2 of topotecan, and grade 3 neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Four of nine (44%) evaluable patients had stable disease or a partial response to the drug combination as assessed by cancer antigen-125 levels. CONCLUSIONS: A 28-day schedule of oxaliplatin and topotecan is safe and well tolerated. Because of the in vitro synergy observed between topoisomerase I inhibitors and platinum derivatives and the tolerability reported in the current study, this regimen warrants further investigation.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.     

A new therapeutical approach: topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum

AIM: Topotecan and gemcitabine have demonstrated mono-activity against recurrent ovarian cancer. Both drugs affect DNA replication; in addition, topotecan inhibits DNA repair. Based on the efficacy profiles and different mechanisms of action, a phase-I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (day 1-5) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in combination with gemcitabine (day 1 + 8) every 21 days. METHODS: Three to six patients were treated per dose-level. Patients with ovarian cancer who had failed a platinum and paclitaxel-containing therapy were enrolled. No individual dose escalation or use of cytokines were allowed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. Fifty percent of all patients were pretreated with at least two platinum-containing therapies. Eighty courses were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was reached at a dosage of 0.75 mg/m2 topotecan in combination with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Thrombocytopenia and leucopenia were the major DLTs. The dose for phase-II trials is 0.50 mg/m2 topotecan given with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. In this dose-level only one related non-haematological adverse event > grade 2 was observed (grade 3 mycotic stomatitis) and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred. Responses were observed in six patients and stable disease in four out of 12 assessable patients. Median survival time was 15.3 (95% CI: 13.21-28.64) months. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate feasibility and the tolerability of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Based on these results a phase-II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this new combination.     

Phase II trial of lapatinib and topotecan (LapTop) in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

Objective

Resistance to chemotherapy is a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian/peritoneal cancer. One purported mechanism of topotecan resistance is the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp). We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and adverse event profile of concomitant topotecan and lapatinib, a small molecule pan-erbB inhibitor that can block BCRP/Pgp efflux of topotecan.

Methods

Patients with platinum-refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer were treated with topotecan 3.2 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, 8 and 15 and lapatinib 1250 mg PO daily, continuously in 28 day cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate. For correlative studies, archived tissue was assessed for expression of EGFR, HER2, HIF-1α, CD31, and BCRP.

Results

Eighteen patients were enrolled and treated. Four experienced evidence of clinical benefit: one partial response and three with stable disease. Using a two-stage Simon design, the trial was stopped after the first stage due to insufficient activity. Grades 3+ and 4+ adverse events (AE) were experienced in 14 and 4 patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 AE were neutropenia (56%), thrombocytopenia (28%), and diarrhea (22%).

Conclusions

The combination of lapatinib plus topotecan for the treatment of platinum refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian cancer lacks sufficient activity to warrant further investigation. In particular, hematologic adverse events were substantial. Expression of correlative study markers did not reveal patterns of predicted benefit or toxicity. Disruption of erbB signaling and BCRP/Pgp efflux with lapatinib was insufficient for overcoming topotecan resistance, suggesting alternative mechanisms of resistance are involved.     

Sequence dependence of hematologic toxicity using carboplatin and topotecan for primary therapy of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Selection of a feasible sequence and schedule of carboplatin in combination with topotecan for evaluation in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stages III-IV EOC or primary peritoneal carcinoma without prior chemotherapy were assigned to consecutive cohorts evaluating a "forward" (carboplatin day 1, topotecan days 1-3), "reverse" (carboplatin day 3, topotecan days 1-3), or "extended reverse" sequence (carboplatin day 5, topotecan days 1-5). Patients received 4 cycles carboplatin-topotecan followed by 4 cycles carboplatin-paclitaxel. Feasibility was defined according to the cumulative proportion of patients with dose-limiting events (DLEs) during the first four cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled across 5 cohorts. The forward sequence demonstrated unacceptable hematologic DLEs at the lowest topotecan dose (0.75 mg/m2/day x 3 days). The reverse sequence was feasible at 1.25 mg/m2/day x 3 days, with only 1/15 patients experiencing a DLE within 4 cycles, and 14/15 patients were able to receive 4 subsequent cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel. The extended reverse sequence was associated with excessive DLEs at 1.00 mg/m2/day x 5 days. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not required. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of topotecan could be safely administered with reduced toxicity over multiple cycles using the reverse sequence, which was selected for phase III evaluation. The relative efficacy of the forward and reverse sequence is unknown.