A Retrospective Review of Factors Associated with Vasovasostomies in United States Military Members

Background

Men seeking a vasectomy should receive counseling prior to the procedure that includes discussion of later seeking a reversal. We sought to determine demographic factors that may predispose patients to possibly later seek a vasectomy reversal.

Methods

All U.S. Military electronic health records were searched between 2000 and 2009 for either a vasectomy or vasovasostomy procedure code. Aggregate demographic information was collected and statistical analysis performed.

Result

A total of 82,945 patients had a vasectomy of which 4,485 had a vasovasostomy resulting in a vasovasostomy-to-vasectomy rate of 5.04%. The average age at vasovasostomy was 34.9±5.0, with an average interval of 4.1±2.2 years. Men undergoing a vasectomy at a younger age were more likely to have a vasovasostomy. Various religions did have statistically significant differences. Within ethnic groups, only Native Americans [OR=1.39 (95% CI 1.198-1.614)] and Asians [OR=0.501 (95% CI 0.364-0.690)] had statistically significant differences when compared to Caucasians. Men with more children at the time of vasectomy were more likely to have a vasovasostomy.

Conclusion

Younger men, Native Americans, and men with more children at vasectomy were more likely to undergo a vasovasostomy. The reason for these differences is unknown, but this information may assist during pre-vasectomy counseling.Key Words: Vasovasostomy, Vasectomy counseling, Demographics, Infertility     

Loupe-assisted modified one-layer vasovasostomy

Several studies indicate that microsurgical modified one-layer vasovasostomy is comparable to the two-layer anastomosis with respect to patency and pregnancy rates. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and result of modified one-layer vasovasostomy under loupe magnification only. Thirty-two patients aged 28 to 64 years (mean 41.3 +/- 6 years) underwent vasovasostomy at CGMH from July 1997 to June 2002, with all operations being a modified on-layer anastomosis created with the aid of a 3 x loupe. The estimated duration of vasectomy ranged from 4 months to 27 years, with a mean of 9.2 +/- 4.8 years. Postoperative semen analysis and pregnancy were examined. Each patient was followed up at 1,4, and 12 weeks postoperatively. The total operation time ranged from 118 to 228 minutes (average 150 +/- 35 minutes). There was no operation-related complication such as hematoma or wound infection. The patency rate was 89% (25/28), and the pregnancy rate at 2 years or more of follow-up was 39% (11/28). The patency and pregnancy rates were similar to those obtained in most studies of microsurgical vasovasostomy. For uncomplicated vasectomy reversal, this simple loupe-assisted modified one-lyer vasovasostomy seems to provide an adequate anastomosis.     

Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies

Objectives

Advances in surgical techniques have improved the outcome of microsurgical vasovasostomy (VV). We performed a retrospective analysis of surgical procedures to determine outcomes and predictors of VV success, to develop Kaplan–Meier Curves for predicting VV outcomes and to evaluate the use of α-glucosidase (AG) to predict outcomes.

Patients and Methods

We undertook a retrospective analysis of 747 modified 1-layer microsurgical VV procedures performed between 1984 and 2000. Obstructive interval, partner status, social status preoperatively and method of vasal obstruction, vasal fluid quality and sperm granuloma intraoperatively were compared with outcome results. Parameters evaluated at follow-up included semen analysis, AG concentration in ejaculate fluid and pregnancy rates.

Results

The overall patency rate was 86% and pregnancy rates were 33% and 53% at 1 and 2 years after primary VV, respectively. Preoperative factors associated with successful outcome and pregnancy included shorter obstructive interval and same female partner (p < 0.05). Intraoperative factors predicting success included the use of surgical clips instead of suture at vasectomy, the presence of a sperm granuloma, the presence and quality of vasal fluid, and the presence and quality of sperm in vasal fluid. Further, increased AG in the postoperative semen predicted improved patency and pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusion

This study confirms the effectiveness of VV for vasectomized men who wish to father children. It also demonstrates that preoperative and intraoperative factors are predictive of the VV outcome. Postoperative AG is also a useful marker of patency and it appears to predict pregnancy outcome.     

Advances in Male Reproductive Surgery: Robotic-Assisted Vasovasostomy

It is estimated that 3–6% of all vasectomised men request vasectomy reversal for different reasons. Microsurgical vasovasostomy is the gold standard technique of vasectomy reversal. However, the microsurgical technique is time-consuming and challenging to most urological surgeons. Therefore, alternative methods of vasal anastomosis have been studied including robotic-assisted vasovasostomy. This review discusses the feasibility and practice of robotic-assisted vasovasostomy. Based on the available studies robotic-assisted vasovasostomy is feasible. The reported rate of vasal patency associated with this new technique is similar to that of microsurgical vasovasostomy. There is no clear difference between the 2 approaches in terms of operating time. Robotic-assisted vasovasostomy does not appear to afford significant advantages in the era of vasectomy reversal.Key Words: Robotic surgery, Vasectomy reversal, Vasovasostomy     

Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success

PURPOSE: We review the treatment outcomes for microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal and identify predictors for success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our experience with microsurgical reconstruction in 41 men who underwent 1 or more prior unsuccessful vasectomy reversal procedures. Of these patients 20 underwent bilateral (16) or unilateral (4) vasoepididymostomy, 11 underwent bilateral (7) or unilateral (4) vasovasostomy and 10 underwent unilateral vasoepididymostomy with contralateral vasovasostomy. Postoperative followup consisted of serial semen analyses and telephone interviews. RESULTS: Patency and pregnancy followup data were available in 33 and 31 patients, respectively. Five couples had ongoing uncorrected female factor infertility problems and were not included in pregnancy rate calculations. Mean obstructive interval was 10.6 years. Overall patency and pregnancy rates were 79 and 31%, respectively. Mean total motile sperm count for patients demonstrating patency at followup was 38.0 million. History of conception with the current partner was predictive of future conception with 4 of 5 nonremarried couples (80%) initiating a pregnancy versus 3 of 18 remarried couples (17%) (p = 0.006). Other factors, including smoking history and obstructive interval, did not correlate with postoperative success. Reconstruction with vasovasostomy on at least 1 side trended toward improved patency (p = 0.17) and pregnancy rates (p = 0.15), although they did not assume statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal is associated with high patency and moderate pregnancy rates at short-term followup. In our series previous conception with the current partner was predictive of future conception after reconstruction. Urologists performing repeat vasectomy reversal must be familiar with microsurgical techniques, since almost three-quarters of patients will require at least unilateral vasoepididymostomy.     

Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy

Purpose

To identify factors predicting success and analyze critically the status of microsurgical double-layer vasovasostomy using predictive models.

Methods

A cohort of 263 patients treated at our institution for vasectomy reversal between 1986 and 2010 was included in our study, and the literature was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were previous bilateral vasectomy and presence of at least two postoperative semen analyses; patients reporting pregnancy without a postoperative semen analysis were excluded. A double-layer, microscope-assisted, tension-free anastomosis vasovasostomy was performed approximating mucosa to mucosa and muscle to muscle with a 10-0 non-absorbable suture. A multivariate logistic regression backward stepwise model was used to predict combined success, and a predictive model was calculated with remaining variables.

Results

Mean age was of 41.6 years (SD 7.1); mean duration of obstruction 7.2 years (SD 6.7). On multivariate analysis, uni- or bilateral granuloma and Silber grade of I–III were variable identified predicting higher probability to success (OR 3.105; 95% CI 1.108–8.702; p = 0.031 and OR 4.795; 95% CI 2.117–10.860; p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Based on our results, some factors predicting success after vasovasostomy surgery are known but others remain unknown; our predictive model may easily predict patency and success after this surgery and offers a concrete assistance in counseling patients.

     

Microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy

PURPOSE: We analyzed our experience with repeat microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy and elucidate the possible predictors of surgical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 62 repeat vasectomy reversal cases with followup data available. Regardless of the intraoperative observation of sperm in the vasal fluid bilateral microsurgical 2-layer vasovasostomy was performed when surgically possible. Of these 62 patients 60 (97%) underwent bilateral (58) or unilateral (2) vasovasostomy and 2 (3%) underwent unilateral vasovasostomy with contralateral epididymovasostomy. RESULTS: Patency and pregnancy followup data were available on 62 and 42 patients, respectively. The overall patency and pregnancy rates achieved were 92% and 57%, respectively, and the natural birth rate was 52%. Increased age of the wife proved a negative prognostic factor for pregnancy (p = 0.018). The intraoperative detection of sperm and other factors, including obstructive interval, reconstruction type, anastomotic site, patient age and postoperative semen parameters, did not influence the surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the detection of sperm in the intravasal fluid during the operation repeat microsurgical vasovasostomy resulted in a better outcome than in other studies, in which adopted epididymovasostomy was done when sperm was absent from the vas fluid. Our study suggests that compromised anastomosis after previous surgery is the most common cause of failed vasovasostomy. We recommend that microsurgical vasovasostomy should be performed preferentially in failed vasovasostomy cases.     

Failed vasectomy reversal: is a further attempt using microsurgery worthwhile?

OBJECTIVE: To determine, in failed vasectomy reversal, the usefulness of a revised anastomosis using microsurgery in achieving sperm in the ejaculate and fertility, and to relate the outcome to the site of the anastomosis, length of time from vasectomy, and presence or absence of sperm in the vas at surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a series of 28 patients with confirmed anastomotic obstruction undergoing vasectomy reversal (over a 10-year period), a microsurgical technique using an oblique end-to-end two-layer interrupted anastomosis with 10/0 Nylon was used to establish vasal continuity. Subsequent seminal analysis at 3-6 months and ensuing paternity were related to several variables. The results were compared with those obtained after 137 cases of primary microsurgical vasovasostomy. RESULTS: Sperm was restored to the ejaculate in 16 (57%) of the patients and successful fertilization was reported in nine (32%). The interval between vasectomy and reversal surgery was relevant to the outcome, with four out of four men having sperm in the ejaculate within 5 years and three achieving paternity. However, the fertility rate was still moderate after an interval of 6-10 years (two of six) and at > 10 years (four of 18). The presence of sperm in the ejaculate was related to whether or not sperm were found in the testicular end of the vas at operation, but absence did not preclude a successful outcome. The overall results were not significantly different from those after primary microsurgical reversal surgery. CONCLUSION: Microscopic vasovasostomy after previous obstructive failure provides the patient with a further reasonable chance of becoming fertile; although diminishing with time from vasectomy, even after a prolonged period there can be success. The absence of sperm at the time of vasovasostomy does not necessarily indicate failure, but in these cases the presence of thick creamy fluid in the vas predicts a poor outcome, and alternative methods of management should be considered. A microsurgical technique extending, if necessary, well into the convoluted part of the vas, is recommended. Microsurgical skills, relevant equipment and adequate time are required.     

Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group

During a 9-year period 1,469 men who underwent microsurgical vasectomy reversal procedures were studied at 5 institutions. Of 1,247 men who had first-time procedures sperm were present in the semen in 865 of 1,012 men (86%) who had postoperative semen analyses, and pregnancy occurred in 421 of 810 couples (52%) for whom information regarding conception was available. Rates of patency (return of sperm to the semen) and pregnancy varied depending on the interval from the vasectomy until its reversal. If the interval had been less than 3 years patency was 97% and pregnancy 76%, 3 to 8 years 88% and 53%, 9 to 14 years 79% and 44% and 15 years or more 71% and 30%. The patency and pregnancy rates were no better after 2-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy than after modified 1-layer microsurgical procedures and they were statistically the same for all patients regardless of the surgeon. When sperm were absent from the intraoperative vas fluid bilaterally and the patient underwent bilateral vasovasostomy rather than vasoepididymostomy, patency occurred in 50 of 83 patients (60%) and pregnancy in 20 of 65 couples (31%). Neither presence nor absence of a sperm granuloma at the vasectomy site nor type of anesthesia affected results. Repeat microsurgical reversal procedures were less successful. A total of 222 repeat operations produced patency in 150 of 199 patients (75%) who had semen analyses and pregnancy was reported in 52 of 120 couples (43%).     

Vasoepididymostomy for Vasectomy Reversal: A Critical Assessment in the Era of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

Purpose

We compared vasoepididymostomy to microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for treatment of epididymal obstruction secondary to vasectomy.

Materials and Methods

Results in patients who underwent vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal at our institution were compared to those reported previously for microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed for obstructive azoospermia. The pregnancy rates, delivery rates, complications, cost per procedure and cost per delivery were compared. A cost per newborn analysis was performed using pregnancy and delivery rates, and reported cost estimates for the complications of assisted reproductive techniques.

Results

A total of 55 men underwent 58 vasoepididymostomies in an attempt to restore fertility after vasectomy. Median followup was 19 months (range 0 to 115). Median obstructive interval was 12 years. There were no major complications. The patency rate after 6 months was 85%. Of the couples 20 achieved 24 pregnancies and 16 had 17 live births. The pregnancy rate at 1 year was 44%. There were 4 miscarriages and there are 3 ongoing pregnancies. The live delivery rate was 36%. Assuming a 29% delivery rate for microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, the cost per newborn was $51,024, compared to $31,099 for vasoepididymostomy.

Conclusions

Vasoepididymostomy is more successful and more cost-effective than microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for vasectomy reversal. It does not expose the women to complications in the treatment of a male problem and it is indicated for treatment of epididymal obstruction secondary to vasectomy. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be reserved for cases not amenable to surgical reconstruction.     

Toward a sutureless vasovasostomy: use of biomaterials and surgical sealants in a rodent vasovasostomy model

PURPOSE: With 500,000 to 800,000 vasectomies performed annually and a reversal rate of 3% to 8% vasectomy reversal has become a commonly performed procedure. Two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy remains the gold standard for surgical reconstruction of the vas. However, this procedure is technically demanding and time-consuming. We determined the ability of biomaterials and surgical sealants to decrease the number of sutures used, enhance anastomosis watertightness and decrease operative time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult male Wistar rats underwent vasectomy 2 weeks prior to vasovasostomy. Standard 2-layer microsurgical repair was performed in control animals. Experimental groups underwent 3-suture mucosal approximation and then completion of the anastomosis with a biomaterial membrane and/or synthetic sealant. The rats were sacrificed 9 weeks after vasovasostomy. Anastomotic patency was assessed functionally by the presence of motile sperm in the vas distal to the testes and anastomosis, and mechanically by methylene blue vasogram. The presence and size of sperm granulomas were also recorded. RESULTS: Microsurgical vasovasostomy required significantly less time when biomaterial (42.7 minutes) or sealant (40 minutes) was used compared to the standard sutured group (102.5 minutes, each p < 0.001). There was no difference in patency between the standard sutured and biomaterial groups (90% vs 92%). Patency was significantly lower in the sealant groups, that is 70% in the suture, biomaterial and sealant group, and 75% in the suture and sealant group. The biomaterial group had only 1 sperm granuloma in 12 procedures, which was significantly better than the 7 in the control group (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using a biomaterial wrap during vasovasostomy resulted in significantly decreased operative time and fewer sperm granulomas than in the control group. Sealants were not effective. Biomaterial wrap may support vasovasostomy and by decreasing leakage improve the outcome.     

Should all urologists performing vasectomy reversals be able to perform vasoepididymostomies if required?

PURPOSE: While vasectomy reversal is a highly successful procedure 10% to 30% of reversals may fail. Despite the general consensus that an epididymal obstruction may occur following a vasectomy and that some men should undergo vasoepididymostomy (VE) rather than vasovasostomy (VV), the practice of many urologists in our region has been to offer only VV for vasectomy reversal. We examined the potential causes for vasectomy reversal failure in patients who had undergone VV without an attempt at VE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had undergone redo vasectomy reversal from January 1999 to September 2001. A total of 22 patients underwent redo reversal with a minimum followup of 2 years. The medical records of all patients were then reviewed. Patients and partners seen postoperatively in the clinic were questioned regarding any pregnancy or deliveries. RESULTS: We examined 22 patients who had undergone redo vasectomy reversal. Of 22 patients 9 (40.9%) underwent repeat VV, 8 (36.3%) underwent bilateral VE for a presumed unrecognized epididymal obstruction and 5 (22.7%) had a combination of VE and VV. Of the 44 reproductive units studied 23 (52.3%) had a failed vasal anastomosis while 21 (47.7%) had an unrecognized epididymal obstruction. Based on semen analysis patency was observed in 75% of patients who had undergone vasovasostomy as a redo procedure. A patency rate of 60% was found in patients who underwent vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy unilaterally, and patency rates for bilateral VE were 63%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that a large proportion of men (48%) have an epididymal obstruction as the etiology for vasectomy reversal failure. We recommend that all surgeons offering vasectomy reversals be able to offer VE if required based on intraoperative findings to serve the patient adequately as well as his partner and their future fertility.     

Hepaticocholecystoenterostomy as an alternative to hepaticojejunostomy for biliary bypass

INTRODUCTION

Hepaticojejunostomy is the standard biliary bypass technique for periampullary cancer when trial dissection reveals unresectable disease or endoscopic stent placement is not possible. This anastomosis can be technically demanding and potentially difficult. The simpler technique of hepaticocholecystoenterostomy (HCE) has only previously been reported in very limited numbers and without outcome data.

METHODS

All patients undergoing HCE for the management of periampullary cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained computerised database of a single surgeon and were reviewed retrospectively. The HCE technique achieves a biliary bypass by two anastomoses, using the gallbladder as a conduit. It involves an anastomosis of the infundibulum of the gallbladder to the common hepatic duct followed by a second anastomosis of the gallbladder fundus to the proximal small bowel.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2010, 30 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma required a biliary bypass after a failed trial of Whipple procedure (80%) or failed endoscopic stenting (20%). There were 19 men and 11 women with a mean age of 64.5 years. The mean operative time for HCE alone was 92 minutes. The mean length of hospital stay was nine days. There was a single grade 2 complication (readmission with gastric emptying delay) and a single grade 3 complication (bile leak requiring reoperation). Thirty-day mortality was zero and the mean survival was 12 months (with one patient still alive at the time of writing). There were no readmissions with recurrent biliary obstruction or cholangitis. One patient had developed an incisional hernia by the 24 month follow-up appointment.

CONCLUSIONS

HCE in periampullary cancer is safe and effective in selected patients. It involves two simple anastomoses with good access rather than one more demanding anastomosis. Morbidity, patency and overall survival are comparable with contemporary published series of hepaticojejunostomy.     

Vasovasostomy and predictors of vasal patency: a systematic review

About 3-6% of vasectomized men requested vasectomy reversal, for various reasons. Vasal patency (VP) is an important surrogate outcome of vasectomy reversal. This article reviews the impact of surgical skills, surgical approaches, intraoperative vasal fluid characteristics and the length of obstructive interval on VP. Based on the best available evidence, the rate of patency is related to the operative frequency of the surgeons, with better results obtained by surgeons who perform the operations at least 10 times annually. Microsurgical vasovasostomy is the preferred technique for durable good results. One-layer vasovasostomy and two-layer vasovasostomy seem to be equal with regard to VP. The rate of patency following vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas and vasovasostomy in the straight vas is comparable. The patency rate is high in men with clear intraoperative vasal fluid in at least one vas. VP is still high among patients with a long obstructive interval. In conclusion, surgical skills and intraoperative vasal fluid characteristics are the most important predictors of VP. Postoperative semen quality and the age of the female partner determine the chance of spontaneous conception in these couples.     

PARTIAL OBSTRUCTION, NOT ANTISPERM ANTIBODIES, CAUSING INFERTILITY AFTER VASOVASOSTOMY

Purpose

We determined whether men who may have partial obstruction and antisperm antibodies after vasovasostomy can be distinguished from other infertile men with antisperm antibodies only, and whether repeat microsurgical reversal is beneficial in such patients.

Materials and Methods

A total of 412 patients underwent indirect immunobead testing for antisperm antibodies at our laboratory from December 1991 through July 1996. Of 95 patients with an assay greater than 20% binding 49 had normal partners and were grouped by history of vasovasostomy (20), varicocele (9), cryptorchidism (8) and epididymo-orchitis (12). Semen analysis characteristics and antisperm antibody binding variables were compared across histories. Pregnancy rates were compared between patients treated surgically for partial obstruction and those treated for antisperm antibodies. Mean followup was 33.8 months.

Results

Compared to the other 3 groups, men with a history of vasectomy and reversal had significantly lower sperm concentration (p = 0.002), poorer motility (p <0.001), lower overall binding on the indirect immunobead assay (p <0.001) and lower IgA binding (p = 0.008). The clinical diagnosis of partial obstruction was based on a sense of epididymal fullness by palpation, as well as the aforementioned semen parameters. Of the 20 patients with a history of vasectomy and reversal 14 were diagnosed with partial obstruction and underwent repeat microsurgical reversal and 6 with a history of vasovasostomy but no evidence of obstruction received no further therapy and never established pregnancies. The remaining 29 patients underwent sperm washing and assisted reproduction. Of 14 patients 7 (50%) established pregnancies after repeat reversal compared to only 5 of 29 patients (17.2%) treated with assisted reproduction (P = 0.025).

Conclusions

Antisperm antibodies are not a significant factor in persistently infertile post-reversal cases with the aforementioned criteria. Repeat reversal appears to be the most successful treatment option in this setting.     

Microsurgical vasovasostomy

Up to 6% of men who have undergone vasectomy will ultimately elect for reversal in the form of vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy for various reasons. Vasovasostomy performed to regain fertility is a technique that has undergone numerous advances during the last century, including the use of microsurgical equipment and principles to construct a meticulous anastomosis. It is important during vasovasostomy to ensure good blood supply to the anastomosis as well as to build as a tension-free anastomosis. Visual inspection to ensure healthy mucosa and inner muscularis as well as atraumatic handling of tissues is helpful. With vasovasostomy, it is essential to create a watertight anastomosis to prevent secondary scar formation. The microdot technique of vasovasostomy allows for markedly discrepant lumens to be brought together more precisely. Thereby, the planning is separated from suture placement, which prevents dog-ears and avoids subsequent leaks. In the age of in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), it becomes even more important to clarify outcomes after vasectomy reversals, as patients now have a choice between surgical sperm retrieval coupled with IVF/ICSI versus vasectomy reversal. Little data on long-term outcomes for vasectomy reversals exist. Therefore, further research in this field needs to evaluate the rate of late failures and the predictors of late failures.     

Microsurgical Varicocele Repair on Men with Grade III Lesions and Chronic Dull Scrotal Pain: A Pilot Study

Introduction

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of microsurgical varicocele repair in patients with grade III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.

Materials and Methods

The study was based on 8 patients with grade III left-sided varicocele and chronic dull scrotal pain for whom a microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair was performed. The 1-year follow-up included pain assessment and scrotal examination.

Results

Of the 8 patients, 7 (88%) reported complete resolution of pain with no palpable varicocele on scrotal examination. No cases of testicular atrophy or hydrocele formation were reported.

Conclusion

These results indicated that microsurgical varicocele repair may benefit patients with grade III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.Key Words: Microsurgery, Chronic scrotal pain, Varicocele, Varicocele repair     

Need for sperm retrieval and cryopreservation at vasectomy reversal

PURPOSE: Controversy exists on whether to obtain sperm for cryopreservation routinely at vasectomy reversal. With recent improvements in in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, it is now possible to obtain a small amount of testicular tissue for cryopreservation in the event of reversal failure. However, to our knowledge no studies exist of who is most likely to benefit from this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 84 consecutive vasectomy reversals performed by 1 surgeon (J. I. S.) between July 1996 and March 2000 with followup available for 77. We grouped cases by procedure as vasovasostomy, vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy with vasoepididymostomy as well as bilateral or unilateral. Sperm was retrieved at reversal in 15 of 46 vasovasostomy (none used), 11 of 18 vasoepididymostomy (3 used) and 13 of 20 vasovasostomy with vasoepididymostomy (none used) cases. RESULTS: The overall anastomotic patency rate after unilateral or bilateral vasovasostomy, unilateral vasovasostomy with contralateral vasoepididymostomy and unilateral or bilateral vasoepididymostomy was 96%, 83% and 57%, respectively. The natural pregnancy rate without in vitro fertilization was 57%, 50% and 14%, respectively. The most recent vasoepididymal anastomoses were performed by the Berger triangulation technique with a 78% patency and 25% pregnancy rate. Only 8% of men with banked sperm eventually used it for assisted reproductive techniques, in whom unilateral or bilateral vasoepididymostomy failed in all. CONCLUSIONS: We currently do not recommend routine sperm retrieval for cryopreservation in men who undergoing vasovasostomy. We encourage men who require bilateral vasoepididymostomy to bank sperm at reversal. In men who undergo vasovasostomy with vasoepididymostomy we base the decision on preoperative counseling and intraoperative findings.     

An inexpensive yet realistic model for teaching vasectomy

Purpose

Teaching the no-scalpel vasectomy is important, since vasectomy is a safe, simple, and cost-effective method of contraception. This minimally invasive vasectomy technique involves delivering the vas through the skin with specialized tools. This technique is associated with fewer complications than the traditional incisional vasectomy (1). One of the most challenging steps is the delivery of the vas through a small puncture in the scrotal skin, and there is a need for a realistic and inexpensive scrotal model for beginning learners to practice this step.

Materials and Methods

After careful observation using several scrotal models while teaching residents and senior trainees, we developed a simplified scrotal model that uses only three components–bicycle inner tube, latex tubing, and a Penrose drain.

Results

This model is remarkably realistic and allows learners to practice a challenging step in the no-scalpel vasectomy. The low cost and simple construction of the model allows wide dissemination of training in this important technique.

Conclusions

We propose a simple, inexpensive model that will enable learners to master the hand movements involved in delivering the vas through the skin while mitigating the risks of learning on patients.     

Lower extremity free flaps: a review

Objective

To identify factors related to free-flap coverage of lower extremity fractures that are linked to a negative outcome.

Design

A chart review.

Setting

A large microsurgical referral centre.

Patients

From 1981 to 1989, the records of all patients who underwent free-tissue transfer to the lower extremity with more than 1 year of follow-up were selected. From this was drawn a subgroup of 49 patients (mean age, 36 years) who had tibial fractures (55% were motor vehicle injuries) and in almost all cases established soft-tissue or bony defects. They formed the study group.

Intervention

Free-flap transfer.

Outcome Measures

Factors that might be associated with free-flap failure: mechanism of injury, grade of tibial fracture, history of smoking, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, ischemic heart disease, vascular compromise in the leg preoperatively, recipient artery used, type of anastomosis, and hypertension or hypotension intraoperatively.

Results

Type IIIB tibial fractures were the most frequent (67%) and carried a significantly (p = 0.02) higher risk of free-flap failure than other types of fracture. Patients underwent a mean of four procedures before referral for free-tissue transfer. The mean time from injury to flap coverage was 1006 days. Stable, long-term coverage of the free flaps was achieved in 78% of patients. Wound breakdown was most often caused by recurrent osteomyelitis (65%). Seventy-four percent of the fractures healed. The amputation rate was 10%. Four patients required repeat free-flap transfer for limb salvage.

Conclusion

Only the grade of tibial fracture could be significantly related to postoperative free-flap failure.