Delayed Graft Function Duration in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants

BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is an important prognostic indicator after kidney transplantation. Depending on the severity of the ischemia-reperfusion injury, DGF can have several clinical presentations, with different renal function recovery times. Both the presence and duration of DGF can have an impact on kidney transplantation outcomes. However, the definition of the cutoff point, above which the outcomes are worse, varies widely in the literature.MethodsTo investigate the impact of DGF and its duration on patient and graft survivals, a single-center retrospective study including all deceased donor kidney transplants was performed between November 2008 and December 2015 (n = 188). Through the analysis on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cutoff point that determined the worst outcome was reached. DGF patients were then divided according to the duration of DGF (<8 days or ≥8 days).ResultsThe overall incidence of DGF was 62.2%. Higher HLA mismatches was an independent risk factor for prolonged DGF. DGF ≥8 days was associated with acute rejection and this one was associated with patient death in 3 years.ConclusionDGF with a duration of more than 8 days associated with higher HLA mismatches increases the risk of acute rejection, but graft loss and patient survival are not affected by DGF, regardless of its duration.     

Risk Factors for the Development of Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Renal Transplants

IntroductionDelayed renal graft function (DGF) is associated with various factors and with a higher complication rate in the posttransplant period. Determination of center-specific risk factors may help to reduce the incidence of DGF and improve transplantation results. The aim of this study was to define risk factors for the development of DGF after renal transplantation.Patients and MethodsThis study included 290 consecutive deceased donor renal transplantations performed in a single center between January 1, 2004, and November 30, 2007. All cases were examined for the presence of DGF, defined as the need for at least 1 dialysis during the first posttransplant week. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: immediate graft function and DGF. Both groups were compared for donor and recipient transplantation factors as well as early posttransplant results.ResultsDGF was observed in 61 cases (21%). Our analysis revealed associations of DGF with recipient age (P = .011), female gender (P = .028), donor age (P = .033), body mass index (P = .007), severe hemodynamic disturbances (P = .005) preexistent glomerular or interstitial sclerosis (P = .002 or P = .028, respectively); and cold ischemia time (CIT; P = .019). Trends toward significance were observed with recipient weight > 100 kg (P = .078), and diabetes mellitus (P = .109). Recipients who experienced DGF showed on higher rate of acute rejection, a longer hospital stay, and an higher level serum creatinine at discharge (P < .001 for all).ConclusionDGF had deleterious effects in the early posttransplant period. Careful allocation and reduction of CIT may improve transplantation results.     

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants

Single-center studies have reported equivalent outcomes of kidney allografts recovered with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) or University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. However, these studies were likely underpowered and often unadjusted, and multicenter studies have suggested HTK preservation might increase delayed graft function (DGF) and reduce graft survival of renal allografts. To further inform clinical practice, we analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database of deceased donor kidney transplants performed from July 2004 to February 2008 to determine if HTK (n = 5728) versus UW (n = 15 898) preservation impacted DGF or death-censored graft survival. On adjusted analyses, HTK preservation had no effect on DGF (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, p = 0.7) but was associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, p = 0.008). The detrimental effect of HTK was a relatively late one, with a strong association between HTK and subsequent graft loss in those surviving beyond 12 months (HR 1.43, p = 0.007). Interestingly, a much stronger effect was seen in African-American recipients (HR 1.55, p = 0.024) than in Caucasian recipients (HR 1.18, p = 0.5). Given recent studies that also demonstrate that HTK preservation reduces liver and pancreas allograft survival, we suggest that the use of HTK for abdominal organ recovery should be reconsidered.     

Long-Term Outcome of Deceased Donor Renal Transplants Correlates with the 30-Day Creatinine Reduction Ratio

A simplified model to correlate early allograft function with long-term allograft survival in recipients of deceased donor renal transplants (DDRT) remains challenging. We propose here a novel approach, using the change from the pretransplant creatinine to the 30-day posttransplant creatinine. The outcomes of 153 consecutive DDRT performed at our center between January 1998 and March 2001 were reviewed. The percentage change in creatinine from the pretransplant to 1 month posttransplant, termed here, the creatinine reduction ratio (CRR), was calculated as follows: (pretransplant creatinine-creatinine at 1 month)/pretransplant creatinine *100%. Patients were divided as follows: group 1 CRR>or=67% and group 2<67%. Group 1 had a graft survival at 1 and 5 years of 100% and 89.1% versus 88% and 69.1% for group 2 (log-rank p=0.0008). The risk ratio for graft loss during the follow-up period was four times lower for the patients on group 1. Using the Cox hazards model to compare CRR>or=67% with determinants of long-term outcome, the risk ratio of graft loss during the observational period was 0.26 (p=0.001). The creatinine reduction ratio, when stratified by a level of >or=67% has a strong correlation with superior long-term allograft survival in recipients of DDRT.     

Estimated and Measured Donor Creatinine Clearance are Poor Predictors of Long-Term Renal Graft Function and Survival

The objective of this study was to evaluate estimated and measured donor renal function in predicting graft function long-term and to identify donor criteria associated with nonacceptable graft prognosis. In 200 consecutive cadaver donors creatinine clearance was measured at explantation and estimated using the Cockcroft formula on admission serum creatinine. Graft function was evaluated in recipients (n = 387) by 24-h creatinine clearance regularly during 3 years after transplantation. Measured creatinine clearance correlated to some extent with long-term graft function, while Cockcroft estimation was slightly superior and similar to using donor age only. Kidneys from donors with intra-operative creatinine clearance < or = 55 mL/min (median 50 mL/min) produced acceptable recipient graft function of 48 mL/min at 3 years and 76% 3-year graft survival. Donor age > or =60 years resulted in clearance at 3 years of 29 mL/min and 78% 3-year graft survival; adding the criteria of admission Cockcroft < or =60 mL/min, graft function at 3 years (28 mL/min) and 3-year graft survival (76%) were similar. In conclusion, creatinine-based estimates of the functional capacity of the donor kidney, calculated or intra-operatively measured, do little to improve the ability of donor age alone to predict long-term allograft function after renal transplantation, and nonacceptable donors are not discriminated.     

Delayed Graft Function Decreases Early and Intermediate Graft Outcomes After Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants

Use of expanded criteria donors (ECD) has increased worldwide in previous years because of the donor scarcity. However, ECD are related to a greater risk of complications and shorter graft longevity. Delayed graft function (DGF) which impacts renal graft survival, represents one of the most common complications posttransplantation. The purpose of this study was to analyse DGF incidence among ECD kidneys and its role on early and intermediate recipient and graft survivals. We prospectively analyzed 46 ECD cases divided as group A (absence of DGF; n = 23) and B (DGF; n = 23). Group B was composed of older donors (P = .033) with longer cold ischemia times (P = .017), and greater incidences of acute rejection episodes (ARE) (P < .0001). Comparing group A with group B, we observed 1-year and 3-year overall recipient survivals to be 95.7% and 95.7% versus 91.3% and 91.3%, respectively (P = not significant). Censored 1-year and 3-year overall graft survivals were 100% and 92.9% versus 85.6% and 79.9%, respectively (P = .026). Analyzing the patients with DGF without (n = 9) versus with concomitant ARE (n = 14), no differences were noted in recipient and graft survivals. The incidence of DGF was strictly related to increased donor age, greater cold ischemia time, and presence of an ARE while DGF did not have a role in recipient survival, it reduced, graft survival. Concomitant ARE was not related to an impaired graft function.     

Delayed Graft Function Has an Equally Bad Impact on Deceased Donor Renal Graft Survival in Both Standard Criteria Donors and Expanded Criteria Donors

Introduction

The use of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) is still limited because of inferior graft survival compared to standard criteria donors (SCDs). We assessed the impact of immediate graft function (IGF) on renal graft survival among recipients of SCD and ECD grafts to determine whether these kidneys performed equally well under “ideal” conditions favoring IGF.

Methods

We included all cadaveric renal transplants performed from 1990 to 2002 (n = 335). Delayed graft function (DGF) was defined as the need for dialysis in the first 7 days posttransplant. Slow graft function (SGF) and IGF were defined as a serum creatinine fall by <20% versus >20% in the first 24 hours posttransplant, respectively. Non-death censored actual graft survivals are reported herein.

Results

Seventy-two of the 335 subjects (21.5%) received organs from ECDs and displayed IGF in 54.7%, SGF 16.2%, and DGF 29.1%. Among SCDs, the SGF and DGF rates were 15.3% and 23.4%, respectively. In ECD, the SGF and DGF rates were 19.4% and 50% (P < .02). Actual graft survivals at 1 and 5 years was 86.3% and 70.4%, respectively. Patients with IGF had higher actual graft survival at 5 years compared to SGF and DGF (83.5% vs 74.1% vs 45.4%). DGF had an equally bad impact on actual 5-year graft survival in SCDs and ECDs (42.6% vs 50%).

Conclusion

DGF has a strong detrimental impact on 5-year graft survival. There is a higher rate of DGF in ECD versus SCD kidneys. The detrimental impact on 5-year actual graft survival is equal in SCD and ECD kidneys. Minimizing DGF should be our goal.     

Effect of Donor Factors on Early Graft Survival in Adult Cadaveric Renal Transplantation

Previous studies of the effect of donor factors on renal transplant outcomes have not tested the role of recipient body mass index, donor/recipient weight ratios and age matching, and other factors. We analyzed 20,309 adult (age 16 or older) recipients having solitary cadaveric renal transplants from adult donors from 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1998 in an historical cohort study (the 2000 United States Renal Data System) of death censored graft loss by the Cox proportional hazards models, which corrected for characteristics thought to affect outcomes. The only independently significant findings in Cox Regression analysis were a high donor/ recipient age ratio (> or = 1.10, e.g. a 55-year-old donor given to a recipient age 50years or younger, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36-4.39) and African American donor kidneys (AHR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.24-2.17). African American recipients and older donors were not at independently increased risk of graft failure in this model. Among donor factors, older donor kidneys given to younger recipients and donor African American kidneys were independently associated with graft loss in recipients of cadaver kidneys. The task for the transplant community should be to find the best means for managing all donor organs without discouraging organ donation.     

A Risk Prediction Model for Delayed Graft Function in the Current Era of Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) impacts short‐ and long‐term outcomes. We present a model for predicting DGF after renal transplantation. A multivariable logistic regression analysis of 24 337 deceased donor renal transplant recipients (2003–2006) was performed. We developed a nomogram, depicting relative contribution of risk factors, and a novel web‐based calculator ( http://www.transplantcalculator.com/DGF ) as an easily accessible tool for predicting DGF. Risk factors in the modern era were compared with their relative impact in an earlier era (1995–1998). Although the impact of many risk factors remained similar over time, weight of immunological factors attenuated, while impact of donor renal function increased by 2‐fold. This may reflect advances in immunosuppression and increased utilization of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) in the modern era. The most significant factors associated with DGF were cold ischemia time, donor creatinine, body mass index, donation after cardiac death and donor age. In addition to predicting DGF, the model predicted graft failure. A 25–50% probability of DGF was associated with a 50% increased risk of graft failure relative to a DGF risk <25%, whereas a >50% DGF risk was associated with a 2‐fold increased risk of graft failure. This tool is useful for predicting DGF and long‐term outcomes at the time of transplant.     

Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Recipients of Deceased Renal Transplants Does Not Improve Early Graft Function: A Multicenter Randomized,Controlled Clinical Trial

Delayed graft function is a frequent complication following deceased donor renal transplantation, and is closely related to ischemia–reperfusion injury. Experimental and clinical studies have shown protection by remote ischemic conditioning (RIC). We hypothesized that recipient RIC before kidney graft reperfusion reduces the time to graft recovery. This multicenter, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial included 225 adult recipients of renal transplants from deceased donors at four transplantation centers in Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Participants were randomized 1:1 to RIC or sham‐RIC. RIC consisted of 4 × 5‐min thigh occlusion by an inflatable tourniquet each followed by 5‐min deflation, performed during surgery prior to graft reperfusion. The tourniquet remained deflated for sham‐RIC. The primary endpoint was the estimated time to a 50% decrease in baseline plasma creatinine (tCr50) calculated from plasma creatinine measurements 30 days posttransplant or 30 days after the last, posttransplant dialysis. No significant differences were observed between RIC and sham‐RIC‐treated patients in the primary outcome median tCr50 (122 h [95% confidence interval [CI] 98–151] vs. 112 h [95% CI 91–139], p = 0.58), or the number of patients receiving dialysis in the first posttransplant week (33% vs. 35%, p = 0.71). Recipient RIC does not reduce the time to graft recovery in kidney transplantation from deceased donors. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01395719.     

Clinical Implications of Initial Renal Function After Deceased Donor Transplant

The aim of this study was to investigate whether slow graft function (SGF) after transplantation of deceased-donor kidneys affected the prevalence of anemia or the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We retrospectively evaluated the records of 534 kidney transplant patients who were classified based on their initial renal function, namely, immediate graft function (IGF), slow graft function (SGF), or delayed graft function (DGF). Among the 534 kidney transplant patients studied, the occurrences of each condition were IGF 104, SGF 133, and DGF 297. Six months after transplantation, a greater percentage of DGF patients were anemic compared with the others (P = .028). However, at 12 months after transplantation, SGF patients showed more anemia than the IGF group. DGF and SGF patients displayed similar GFR values at 18 and 24 months after transplantation. However, IGF patients displayed higher GFRs, even when subjects who experienced acute rejection episodes were censored (P = .004). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was similar among SGF and DGF patients. Patients displaying SGF after deceased-donor transplantation showed a greater tendency to be anemic than those displaying IGF. This study also suggested that SGF patients were at risk for acute rejection episodes and/or significantly reduced kidney function as measured by GFR.     

Survival Rates Among Patients Awaiting Deceased Donor Liver Transplants at a Single High-Volume Korean Center

Background

Since the establishment of the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) in 2000, thousands of patients have been enrolled on the waiting list, but only a small proportion have received a deceased donor liver transplantation. This report on waiting list mortality in Korea based on data from a single institution.

Methods

The 1772 patients enrolled on the waiting list between February 2000 and December 2011 either have not yet received at the time of analysis or have died before receiving an organ. Survival information was obtained in February 2012 by reviewing medical records or by telephone. We excluded patients who died immediately after enrollment or after retransplantation.

Results

Primary diagnoses of those awaiting transplantation were hepatitis B virus-associated cirrhosis (63.7%), alcoholic liver disease (14.3%), hepatitis C virus-associated cirrhosis (13.8%), and acute liver failure due to other causes (8.1%). The priority status of patients on the waiting list was KONOS status 1 (highest priority) in 3.8%, status 2A in 3.9%, status 2B in 41.9%, status 3 to 7 (lowest priority) in 50.5%. Their median survival periods were 1, 1, 18, and 59 months, respectively. The mean Child-Pugh score was 8.5 ± 2.5 and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score 18.1 ± 9.8.

Conclusions

Patients with high MELD scores or hepatocellular carcinoma succumbed soon after being entered on to the waiting list. By increasing organ donation rates and developing a risk-based allocation system, it should be possible to reduce mortality among patients on organ waiting lists.     

Different Risk Factors for Graft Survival Between Living-Related and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

The aim of this study was to determine distinctive risk factors for graft survival of living-related and deceased donor kidney transplantation (KTx).

Effect of Delayed Graft Function on the Outcome and Allograft Survival of Kidney Transplanted Patients from a Deceased Donor

BackgroundIn kidney transplantation (KT), delayed graft function (DGF) is a significant early complication observed in the first week. The study aimed to investigate the impact of DGF on the outcome, allograft, and patient survival after KT with organs from deceased donors.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted using 304 KT patients who received an organ from deceased donors from 2008 to 2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups, DGF positive (DGF⁺) and DGF negative (DGF^–). The database containing the clinical, laboratory, and immunologic information of donors and recipients was statistically analyzed using the SSPS program.ResultsIn this study, 189 (62.17%) were DGF⁺ and 115 (37.83%) were DGF^–. Until 6 months after KT, the estimate glomerular filtration rate was better in group DGF^–, but it was similar between the groups during 10-year follow-up. Graft losses were higher in DGF⁺ group than in the DGF^– (P = .046). The serum creatinine level was persistently higher in DGF⁺ group until the sixth month (P ≤ .05). Allograft survival rates were better in patients who were DGF^– (P = .033). Those who had DGF for more than 15 days had a worse graft survival (P = .003), but in 10 year follow-up, patient survival rates were similar (P = .705).ConclusionDGF⁺ patients were associated with dialysis time before KT, ischemia time, and the donors’ clinical status, such as age, organ quality, and serum creatinine. All these factors had a great impact on graft survival but not on patient survival.     

The First Year Renal Function as a Predictor of Long-Term Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

This study examined the impact of graft function at the end of the first year after kidney transplantation on long-term graft survival. We analyzed the roles of serum creatinine (Scr) and other variables as predictors of graft survival among 235 adult kidney transplant patients. The subjects were divided into 3 groups according to their Scr at the end of the first year: group 1, Scr < 100 μmol/L; group 2, 100 μmol/L ≤ Scr ≤ 150 μmol/L; and group 3, Scr >150 μmol/L. The annual rate of graft loss of 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.77) in group 1, was lower than those in group 2 (2.1%; 95% CI, 2.02-2.18; P < .0001) and group 3 (6%; 5.74-6.26; P < .0001). Regression analysis showed the role of recipient age at the time of operation, and Scr level at the end of the first year to be independent predictors of graft loss. Graft survival was not influenced by any other studied parameter, including donor age, year of procedure, warm ischemia time, history of acute tubular necrosis, and occurrence of an acute rejection episode. We conclude that the 1-year Scr value predicts long-term renal graft survival, representing a simple, practical tool to identify recipients with an high risk for late graft failure.     

Deceased Donor Management and Demographic Factors Related to Kidney Allograft Rejection and Graft Survival

Background

There is agreement that the number of organ donors and the number of organs recovered per donor are not maximized despite promotion of awareness and new guidelines for transplant teams. A single standard for donor management does not exist, in part because there is no consensus with respect to donor factors and management effect on transplant outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the long-term outcomes of 402 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with respect to donor factors. This study differed from previous studies in that all recipients were treated with the same selection and immunosuppressive protocols.

Results

Factors associated with improved graft survival included cause of death, more organs donated, and lower peak sodium (P < .01). Delayed graft function (DGF) decreased if more organs were donated, but increased when the donor was given dopamine. Recipients of donor kidneys with higher final creatinine values were more likely to show DGF (P < .01). A decrease in acute rejection episodes was observed among patients whose donors had received dopamine, donated more organs, and had a shorter time between incision and cross clamp (P < .05). Kidneys from donors with a higher final creatinine displayed fewer rejection episodes; those with a higher peak creatinine experienced more rejection episodes (P < .05).

Conclusion

The effect of donor variables on kidney transplant outcomes is important and may not be consistent with traditional expectations. Additional data collection and assessment of both short- and long-term transplant outcomes are critical to improve our understanding of the impact of deceased donor factors and management.     

Delayed Recovery of Renal Function After Donor Nephrectomy

Background

Many living kidney donors are still at risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) 1 year after nephrectomy. Although some donors still experience poor renal function, many exhibit delayed recovery of renal function afterwards. We studied the factors related to delayed recovery of renal function in patients with CKD at 1 year after nephrectomy.