Mechanisms for metoclopramide-mediated sensitization and haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats

Typical antipsychotics such as the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist, haloperidol are known to cause movement disorders or catalepsy in experimental animals. Catalepsy is believed to result from blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors. In this study two drugs that differ in antipsychotic potency but are similar in blocking dopamine D(2) receptors were used to investigate the mechanism for catalepsy and its sensitization. Metoclopramide is a strong postsynaptic dopamine D(2) receptor blocker with no antipsychotic potency. At low doses of 5 or 10 mg/kg given subcutaneously (s.c.), metoclopramide did not produce catalepsy or movement disturbance for seven days after drug treatment. Also metoclopramide at 10 mg/kg given for five days, failed to induce catalepsy. Haloperidol, another potent dopamine D(2) receptor blocker at 0.5 mg/kg (s.c.) rapidly produced catalepsy and suppressed movement 1 h after a single dose of the drug. Chronic as well as acute treatment with metoclopramide caused sensitization of haloperidol-induced catalepsy. Neurochemical analyses revealed significant dopamine D(2) receptor up-regulation in both frontal cortex and striatum of rats chronically treated with metoclopramide. However, no changes in dopamine D(2) receptor numbers were noted in these areas after chronic treatment with low doses of haloperidol. Significant increases in N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor numbers were observed in both frontal cortex and striatum of metoclopramide treated animals, while haloperidol elicited significant decreases in NMDA receptor numbers in both brain areas. These observations plus previous reports have led us to propose a model for catalepsy and its sensitization. According to this model the increase in NMDA receptors by metoclopramide sensitizes the brain to haloperidol-induced catalepsy. Thus, catalepsy appears to be elicited by simultaneous activation of glutamatergic NMDA and dopamine D(1) receptors as well as a blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors.     

The adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline induces a monoamine-dependent increase of the anticataleptic effects of NMDA receptor antagonists

Previous work revealed that adenosine antagonists as theophylline reversed neuroleptic-induced catalepsy and potentiated anticataleptic effects of dopamine agonists reflecting specific adenosine-dopamine receptor interactions in the central nervous system. We tested whether similar functional interactions exist between adenosine receptors and glutamate receptors of the N-methyl-D-asparte (NMDA) subtype. The present study demonstrates that the anticataleptic effects of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist CGP37849 and the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine can be potentiated by coadministration of a threshold dose of the adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) in haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.)-pretreated rats. This potentiation was elicited only with higher doses of CGP37849 (4 and 8 mg/kg, i.p.) or dizocilpine (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.) in haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), but not in reserpine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) plus -methyl-ptyrosine (100 mg/kg, i.p.)-pretreated animals. Therefore, these synergistic interactions seem to be brought about by indirect monoamine-dependent mechanisms rather than direct functional interrelationships between NMDA and adenosine A_2a receptors.     

The non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist GYKI 52466 counteracts locomotor stimulation and anticataleptic activity induced by the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine

Summary The effects of the non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist GYKI 52466 (2.4 and 4.8 mg/kg, i.p.) on spontaneous locomotor activity and haloperidol-induced catalepsy (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) were assessed in naive rats and in rats pretreated with the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (0.08 mg/kg, i.p.). GYKI 52466 given alone did not alter locomotor activity and haloperidol-induced catalepsy, but significantly antagonized the dizocilpine-induced locomotor stimulation and counteracted the anti-cataleptic effects of dizocilpine on haloperidol-induced catalepsy. Thus blockade of non-NMDA glutamate receptors antagonized the behavioural stimulant effects of a NMDA receptor blockade. Correspondence to: W. Hauber at the above address     

Functional reactivity of the dopaminergic system following acute and chronic ketamine treatments

This study examined the effects of acute (15 mg/kg, i.p.) and chronic subanesthetic (15 mg/kg, i.p., t.i.d, for 6 days) doses of ketamine [a noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist] on amphetamine (presynaptic dopamine releasing agent; 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and apomorphine (a D₂ receptor agonist; 1 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced stereotyped behaviors. The effect of acute and chronic ketamine on haloperidol (a D₂ receptor antagonist; 1.6 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced catalepsy was also examined. Acute ketamine and chronic ketamine pretreatment increased amphetamine-induced stereotyped sniffing and locomotion compared with control groups. Acute ketamine significantly increased apomorphine-induced stereotyped sniffing. However, chronic ketamine had no significant effect on apomorphine-induced stereotyped sniffing. Acute, but not chronic ketamine treatment abolished haloperidol-induced catalepsy. The increase in amphetamine-induced stereotyped behaviors and the reversal of haloperidol-induced catalepsy by acute ketamine suggest that blockade of NMDA receptors by ketamine facilitates dopaminergic transmission. The absence of significant effect of chronic ketamine on apomorphine-induced stereotyped sniffing and haloperidol-induced catalepsy suggests that chronic ketamine does not modulate postsynaptic dopaminergic D₂ receptors. It is suggested that chronic ketamine increased amphetamine-induced behaviors by causing hypersensitivity of presynaptic dopamine releasing mechanisms on dopaminergic terminals.     

Haloperidol conditioned catalepsy in rats: a possible role for D1-like receptors

Decreases in brain dopamine (DA) lead to catalepsy, quantified by the time a rat remains with its forepaws resting on a suspended horizontal bar. Low doses of the DA D2 receptor-preferring antagonist haloperidol repeatedly injected in a particular environment lead to gradual day-to-day increases in catalepsy (catalepsy sensitization) and subsequent testing following an injection of saline reveal conditioned catalepsy. We tested the hypothesis that D1-like and D2 receptors play different roles in catalepsy sensitization and in acquisition and expression of conditioned catalepsy. Rats were repeatedly treated with the DA D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23990 (0.05, 0.1 and 0.25 mg/kg i.p.), the D2 receptor-preferring antagonist haloperidol (0.1, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) or a combination of the two drugs and tested for catalepsy each day in the same environment. Following 10 drug treatment days, rats were injected with saline and tested for conditioned catalepsy in the previously drug-paired environment. Haloperidol did not elicit cataleptic responses in the initial session; however, rats developed sensitization with repeated testing. Significant catalepsy sensitization was not observed in rats repeatedly tested with SCH 23390. When rats were injected and tested with saline following haloperidol sensitization they exhibited conditioned catalepsy in the test environment; conditioned catalepsy was not seen following SCH 23390. Rats treated with 0.05 mg/kg SCH 23390+0.25 mg/kg haloperidol showed catalepsy sensitization but failed to show conditioned catalepsy. Conversely, SCH 23390 (0.05 mg/kg) given on the test day after sensitization to haloperidol (0.25 mg/kg) failed to block conditioned catalepsy. Repeated antagonism of D2 receptors leads to catalepsy sensitization with repeated testing in a specific environment. Conditioned catalepsy requires intact D1-like receptor function during sensitization sessions but not during test sessions. In conclusion, repeated antagonism of D2, but not D1-like receptors leads to catalepsy sensitization with repeated testing in a specific environment. Conditioned catalepsy requires functional D1-like receptors during sensitization sessions but not during test sessions.     

Behavioural pharmacology of the non-competitive NMDA antagonists dextrorphan and ADCI: relations between locomotor stimulation, anticataleptic potential and forebrain dopamine metabolism

The effects of systemic administration of the non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists dextrorphan (10–40mg/kg, i.p.) and [±]-5-aminocarbonyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptan-5,10-imine (ADCI) (25–70mg/kg, i.p.) on basal ganglia-mediated behaviour and on forebrain dopamine metabolism were investigated in rats. Dextrorphan increased locomotor activity but did not induce stereotyped sniffing. ADCI failed to produce any significant motor stimulant and motor depressant actions. Both dextrorphan and ADCI dose-dependently antagonized catalepsy induced by the D-1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 or the D-2 dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol. Only the highest doses of dextrorphan and ADCI increased dopamine metabolism in the prefrontal cortex and/or in the nucleus accumbens, but not in the dorsal striatum. Our results show that dextrorphan and ADCI produce some of the behavioural effects (antagonism of experimentally induced catalepsy) and neurochemical actions (regionally selective stimulation of dopamine metabolism) that have previously been observed in the prototypical non-competitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine. The failure of ADCI to induce hyperlocomotion and stereotypy suggests that anticataleptic doses of ADCI may be devoid of the psychotomimetic actions commonly associated with non-competitive blockade of NMDA receptor function. Received: 10 September 1996 / Accepted: 30 January 1997     

Context-dependent catalepsy intensification is due to classical conditioning and sensitization

Haloperidol-induced catalepsy represents a model of neuroleptic-induced Parkinsonism. Daily administration of haloperidol, followed by testing for catalepsy on a bar and grid, results in a day-to-day increase in catalepsy that is completely context dependent, resulting in a strong placebo effect and in a failure of expression after a change in context. The aim of this study was to analyse the associative learning process that underlies context dependency. Catalepsy intensification was induced by a daily threshold dose of 0.25 mg/kg haloperidol. Extinction training and retesting under haloperidol revealed that sensitization was composed of two components: a context-conditioning component, which can be extinguished, and a context-dependent sensitization component, which cannot be extinguished. Context dependency of catalepsy thus follows precisely the same rules as context dependency of psychostimulant-induced sensitization. Catalepsy sensitization is therefore due to conditioning and sensitization.     

Reduced expression of haloperidol conditioned catalepsy in rats by the dopamine D3 receptor antagonists nafadotride and NGB 2904

Haloperidol, a dopamine (DA) D2 receptor-preferring antagonist, produces catalepsy whereby animals maintain awkward posture for a period of time. Sub-threshold doses of haloperidol fail to produce catalepsy initially, however, when the drug is given repeatedly in the same test environment, gradual day-to-day increases in catalepsy are observed. More importantly, if sensitized rats are injected with saline instead of haloperidol they continue to be cataleptic in the test environment suggesting that environment-drug associations may play a role. DA D3 receptors have been implicated in a number of conditioned behaviors. We were interested if DA D3 receptors contribute to catalepsy sensitization and conditioning in rats. We tested this hypothesis using the DA D3 receptor-selective antagonist NGB 2904 (0.5, 1.8mg/kg) and the DA D3 receptor-preferring antagonist nafadotride (0.1, 0.5mg/kg). For 10 consecutive conditioning days rats were treated with one of the D3 receptor antagonists alone or in combination with haloperidol (0.25mg/kg) and tested for catalepsy, quantified by the time a rat remained with its forepaws on a horizontal bar. On test day (day 11), rats were injected with saline or the D3 receptor antagonist and tested for conditioned catalepsy in the previously drug-paired environment. Rats treated with NGB 2904 or nafadotride alone did not develop catalepsy. Rats treated with haloperidol or haloperidol plus NGB 2904 or nafadotride developed catalepsy sensitization with repeated conditioning. When injected with saline they continued to exhibit catalepsy in the test environment - now conditioned. On the other hand, NGB 2904 (1.8mg/kg) or nafadotride (0.5mg/kg) given on the test day (after sensitization to haloperidol) significantly attenuated the expression of conditioned catalepsy. Our data suggest that the D3 receptor antagonist NGB 2904 (1.8mg/kg) and nafadotride (0.5mg/kg) significantly attenuate conditioned catalepsy in rats when given in test but not when given during sensitization. Results implicate DA D3 receptors in regulating the expression of conditioned catalepsy.     

The discriminative stimulus properties of (+)-HA-966, an antagonist at the glycine/N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

Using a two-lever operant drug discrimination paradigm, rats have been trained to discriminate between the administration of saline and R-(+)-HA-966 (R-(+)-3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolid-2-one, 30 mg/kg i.p.) an antagonist at the glycine modulatory site on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor/ion channel complex. Drug-appropriate responding was not induced in stimulus generalisation experiments when the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, phencyclidine (PCP, 1-8 mg/kg i.p.) was substituted for (+)-HA-966. Similarly, (+)-HA-966 (6-50 mg/kg i.p.) did not induce drug-appropriate responding in animals trained to discriminate PCP (3 mg/kg i.p.) from saline. The results suggest that the behavioural profile of compounds attenuating the actions of NMDA via blockade of the glycine modulatory site may be substantially different from those acting at the ion channel of the NMDA receptor complex.     

Buspirone improves haloperidol-induced Parkinson disease in mice through 5-HT(1A) recaptors

BACKGROUND AND THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The available literatures show that 5-HT(1A) receptors are widely distributed throughout the basal ganglia, and their activation facilitate dopamine release. Neuroleptic drugs such as haloperidol induce Parkinson-like syndrome through blocking brain D(2) receptors. This study aimed to investigate effect of buspirone, a partial agonist of 5HT(1A) receptor, on motor dysfunctions induced by haloperidol and involvement of 5HT(1A) receptors in this regard. METHODS: Study was performed on the male mice weighing 25-30 g. Animals were divided randomly to groups of 10 animals. Motor dysfunction was induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of haloperidol (1 mg/kg). Catalepsy was assayed by bar-test method 5, 60, 120 and 180 minutes after drug administration and motor imbalance was studied by rotarod test. RESULTS AND MAJOR CONCLUSION: Results showed that buspirone (20 mg/kg, i.p.) decreased significantly haloperidol-induced catalepsy and balance disorder in a dose dependent manner. Furthermore, 8-OH-DPAT (10 mg/kg, i.p.), as an agonist of 5-HT(1A) receptor, decreased haloperidol-induced catalepsy and balance disorder. The effect of buspirone (20 mg/kg, i.p.) on haloperidol-induced motor disorders was abolished by NAN-190 (10 mg/kg, i.p.), as a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist. From the results it may be concluded that buspirone improves haloperidol-induced catalepsy and balance disorder through activation of 5-HT(1A) receptors.     

Streptozotocin-induced diabetes differentially modifies haloperidol- and gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB)-induced catalepsy

To examine whether dopamine-mediated behavioral effects are altered in diabetes, this study compared the cataleptic effects of the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol (0.032-0.56 mg/kg) and gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB; 56-1000 mg/kg) in control and streptozotocin (STZ)-treated rats. Haloperidol and GHB produced catalepsy in control and diabetic rats; haloperidol was less potent in diabetic rats (D(50)=0.44 mg/kg) than in controls (D(50)=0.19 mg/kg), while GHB was more potent in diabetic rats (D(50)=392 mg/kg) than in controls (D(50)=550 mg/kg). In diabetic rats, the non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist dizocilpine (0.32 mg/kg) further attenuated haloperidol-induced catalepsy (D(50)=1.2 mg/kg) and further enhanced GHB-induced catalepsy (D(50)=248 mg/kg). That haloperidol is less potent to produce catalepsy in diabetic rats is consistent with reports of altered dopamine receptor binding in diabetes.     

Striatal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in haloperidol-induced catalepsy.

Bilateral ablation of the frontal cortex of rats markedly reduced the catalepsy induced by haloperidol (1 mg/kg i.p.). Similarly, the selective antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (10 micrograms/side), injected bilaterally into the rostral part of the caudate-putamen (CP) reduced haloperidol-induced catalepsy whereas its injection into the intermediate part of the CP was ineffective. The quisqualate receptor antagonist, L-glutamic acid diethyl ester (100 micrograms/side), did not affect haloperidol-induced catalepsy when injected into the rostral part of the CP. On the other hand, NMDA (1 micrograms/side) injected bilaterally into the rostral part of the CP was able to restore haloperidol-induced catalepsy in frontally decorticated rats without any notable cataleptic effect of its own. These findings suggest that a certain degree of tonic stimulatory effect of corticostriatal glutamatergic pathways on NMDA receptors within the rostral part of the CP is a prerequisite for the expression of the cataleptogenic action of haloperidol.     

Substitution for PCP, disruption of prepulse inhibition and hyperactivity induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists: preferential involvement of the NR2B rather than NR2A subunit

The non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) is known to produce a discriminative stimulus in rats. The first aim of the present study was to investigate which NMDA receptor subtype(s) is involved in this effect of PCP. Rats were trained to discriminate PCP (2 mg/kg; i.p.) from saline in a two lever operant task. The NMDA channel blocker, (+)MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg; i.p.) and the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist SDZ 220-581 (3 mg/kg; i.p.) produced 76% of PCP-lever selection (ED50=0.045 and 2 mg/kg, respectively), whereas their respective inactive enantiomers (-)MK-801 (0.025-0.1 mg/kg) and SDZ 221-653 (2-5 mg/kg) induced less than 30% of PCP-appropriate responding. Another competitive NMDA antagonist, SDZ EAB-515 (30 mg/kg; i.p.), induced 63% of PCP-lever responding (ED50=23.48 mg/kg). The selective antagonist of NMDA receptors containing the NR1A/NR2B-subunits Ro 25-6981 (20 mg/kg; i.p.) resulted in a complete substitution (more than 80% of PCP-lever selection) for PCP (ED50=8.59 mg/kg). In contrast, the NR1A/NR2A NMDA receptor-preferring antagonist NVP-AAM077 (2-10 mg/kg; i.p.) failed to produce PCP-like discriminative stimuli. At high doses SDZ 220-581 (ED50=2.44), NVP-AAM077 (ED50=8.33) and SDZ EAB-515 (ED50=25.81) decreased the performance of the rats in this operant task. The ability of these NMDA receptor antagonists to disrupt the prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response and to alter locomotor activity was also studied. PCP (0.5-2 mg/kg; s.c.), SDZ 220-581 (0.5-5 mg/kg; s.c.), SDZ EAB-515 (1-30 mg/kg; i.p.) and Ro 25-6981 (5-20 mg/kg; i.p.) disrupted PPI and at high doses produced hyperlocomotion. In contrast, NVP-AAM077 (5-20 mg/kg; i.p.) did not disrupt PPI and reduced locomotor activity. In conclusion, it appears that the NMDA receptor containing the NR2B, rather than the NR2A subunit, may play a major role in the PCP-like discriminative stimulus. In addition, sensory motor gating disturbances associated with NMDA antagonists do not seem to result from a blockade of NR1/NR2A-containing NMDA receptors.     

Potential antipsychotic and extrapyramidal effects of (R,S)-3,4-dicarboxyphenylglycine [(R,S)-3,4-DCPG], a mixed AMPA antagonist/mGluR8 agonist

An involvement of glutamatergic transmission in schizophrenia has been postulated for several years. According to that view, hypofunction of NMDA receptors and a compensatory increase in glutamate release which overstimulates non-NMDA receptors contributes to psychotic symptoms. Therefore, potential antipsychotic drugs are searched for among compounds which block AMPA receptors and inhibit glutamate release. (R,S)-3,4-dicarboxyphenylglycine [(R,S)-3,4-DCPG] is a mixed antagonist of AMPA receptors and agonist of an autoreceptor, i.e. metabotropic glutamate receptor 8. The aim of the study was to look for putative antipsychotic properties of (R,S)-3,4-DCPG in the model of locomotor stimulation induced by amphetamine or phencyclidine in mice. Moreover, a risk of extrapyramidal side-effects induced by this compound was examined, as capability to induce catalepsy in the bar test and to increase the proenkephalin mRNA expression, measured autoradiographically in striatal slices by in situ hybridization. (R,S)-3,4-DCPG (80 mg/kg i.p.) decreased the amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg s.c.)-but not phencyclidine (3 mg/kg s.c.)-induced hyperactivity. That dose of (R,S)-3,4-DCPG did not decrease the spontaneous locomotor activity of mice. However, a dose of 100 mg/kg ip of that compound evoked catalepsy and enhanced the catalepsy and striatal proenkephalin mRNA expression induced by haloperidol (1-2 mg/kg i.p.). The study seems to suggest that (R,S)-3,4-DCPG may possess antipsychotic properties at doses close to those evoking extrapyramidal side-effects which speaks for its rather typical than atypical neuroleptic profile.     

The neurosteroid 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one affects dopamine-mediated behavior in rodents

RATIONALE: The neurosteroid 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one (3alpha,5alpha-THP) has been previously shown to induce catalepsy in mice that is modified by GABAergic, dopaminergic, adenosinergic and serotonergic agents. In light of the interaction of this endogenous neurosteroid with GABAergic and dopaminergic transmission, there is potential interest in the possible role of 3alpha,5alpha-THP in psychotic disorders. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effect of 3alpha,5alpha-THP in certain dopamine-mediated behavioral paradigms that are widely used to predict antipsychotic-like activity. METHODS: 3alpha,5alpha-THP (1-8 microg per animal, i.c.v.), the classic neuroleptic (dopamine receptor antagonist) haloperidol (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.), and the benzodiazepine diazepam (7 mg/kg, i.p.) were injected into different groups of animals, and their behavior was screened using the following animal tests: conditioned avoidance response, apomorphine-induced climbing, and amphetamine-induced motor hyperactivity. Separate groups of mice that received 3alpha,5alpha-THP (1-8 microg per animal, i.c.v.) were screened for catalepsy. Furthermore, the effect of a sub-cataleptic dose (0.1 microg per mouse, i.c.v.) of 3alpha,5alpha-THP, either alone or in combination with the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin (0.8 mg/kg, i.p.) was measured on haloperidol-induced catalepsy. RESULTS: 3alpha,5alpha-THP like haloperidol reduced conditioned avoidance, apomorphine-induced cage climbing and amphetamine-induced motor hyperactivity. Diazepam only affected conditioned avoidance. 3alpha,5alpha-THP also induced dose-dependent catalepsy. Furthermore, sub-cataleptic doses of 3alpha,5alpha-THP potentiated haloperidol-induced catalepsy. This potentiation was blocked by prior treatment with the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that 3alpha,5alpha-THP, by its action at the GABA(A) receptors, increases GABAergic tone leading to a behavioral profile similar to that of dopamine receptor antagonists.     

NMDA antagonists block restraint-induced increase in extracellular DOPAC in rat nucleus accumbens

The effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists CPP, TCP, PK 26124 and ifenprodil, and of the minor tranquillizer diazepam on stress-induced changes of dopamine metabolism in the nucleus accumbens were investigated in the rat. Dopamine metabolism was assessed by measuring the extracellular levels of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) by means of in vivo differential pulse voltammetry with electrochemically pretreated carbon fiber electrodes. Physical immobilization of the rats for 4 min caused a marked and long-lasting increase in extracellular DOPAC levels in the nucleus accumbens. A similar, though shorter-lasting, augmentation of extracellular DOPAC was observed in the nucleus accumbens after systemic administration of the anxiogenic agent methyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (beta-CCM) (10 mg/kg s.c.). Pretreatment with CPP (1 mg/kg i.p.), TCP (3 mg/kg i.p.), PK 26124 (3 mg/kg i.p.), ifenprodil (3 mg/kg i.p.) or diazepam (2 mg/kg i.p.) totally antagonized the immobilization-induced increase in extracellular DOPAC in the nucleus accumbens. Diazepam and the benzodiazepine (omega 1-2) receptor antagonist flumazenil (30 mg/kg i.p.), but not ifenprodil, also antagonized the beta-CCM-induced activation of dopamine metabolism in the nucleus accumbens. Finally, systemic administration of haloperidol (25 micrograms/kg i.p.) increased the extracellular concentrations of DOPAC in the nucleus accumbens, but pretreatment with ifenprodil (3 mg/kg i.p.) did not modify this response. These data indicate that NMDA receptor antagonists prevent the activation of dopamine metabolism in the nucleus accumbens caused by immobilization stress but not by beta-CCM-induced anxiogenic stimulation. These results suggest that NMDA receptor antagonists may possess an anxiolytic-like action in the rodent, which is exerted via neuroanatomical circuits distinct from those acted upon by diazepam.     

Role of the NMDA receptor subunit in the expression of the discriminative stimulus effect induced by ketamine.

Ketamine, which is a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, has been used as a dissociative anesthetic agent. However, chronic use of ketamine produces psychotomimetic effects, such as nightmares, hallucination and delusion. Therefore, the present study was designed to ascertain the role of the NMDA receptor and sigma receptor in the discriminative stimulus effect induced by ketamine. Fischer 344 rats were trained to discriminate between ketamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) and saline under a fixed-ratio 10 food-reinforced procedure. Non-competitive antagonists for both NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors, such as phencyclidine (0.1--1 mg/kg, i.p.) and dizocilpine (3--30 microg/kg, i.p.), and the NR2A-containing NMDA receptor-preferred antagonist dextromethorphan (3--56 mg/kg, i.p.) fully substituted for the ketamine cue in a dose-dependent manner. By contrast, the NR2B-containing NMDA receptor antagonist ifenprodil (5--20 mg/kg, i.p.) exhibited no generalization. Additionally, the competitive NMDA antagonist 3-[(+/-)-2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl] propyl-1-phosphonic acid ((+/-)-CPP; 0.3--5.6 mg/kg, i.p.) and a sigma receptor ligand DTG (0.3--3 mg/kg, s.c.) displayed no generalization to the ketamine cue. These results suggest that NR1/NR2A subunit containing NMDA antagonism may be critical for the production of the ketamine cue.     

The alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan reverses catalepsy induced by haloperidol in rats independent of striatal dopamine release: role of serotonergic mechanisms.

The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan may improve motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and experimental Parkinsonism. We studied the effect of idazoxan on haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats, an animal model of the drug-induced extrapyramidal side effects in man. Catalepsy was induced by a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of haloperidol (1 mg/kg) and measured by the bar test for a maximum of 5 min. At 3 h after haloperidol, rats were given 0.16-5.0 mg/kg s.c. idazoxan, and descent latency was measured 1 h later. Idazoxan potently reversed haloperidol-induced catalepsy with an ED(50) of 0.25 mg/kg. This effect was mimicked by the selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist RS-15385-197 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg orally). We assessed how dopaminergic mechanisms were involved in the anticataleptic effect of idazoxan by studying its effect on dopamine (DA) release in the striatum, with the microdialysis technique in conscious rats. Idazoxan (0.3 and 2.5 mg/kg) had no effect on extracellular DA and did not modify the rise of extracellular DA induced by haloperidol, indicating that changes of striatal DA release were not involved in the reversal of catalepsy. The anticataleptic effect of 2.5 mg/kg idazoxan (haloperidol+vehicle 288+/-8 s, haloperidol+idazoxan 47+/-22 s) was attenuated in rats given an intraventricular injection of 150 microg of the serotonin (5-HT) neurotoxin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (haloperidol+vehicle 275+/-25 s, haloperidol+idazoxan 137+/-28 s). The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100 635 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) did not affect the anticataleptic effect of idazoxan. The results suggest that idazoxan reversed haloperidol-induced catalepsy by a mechanism involving blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and, at least in part, 5-HT neurons.     

The antidepressive-like effect of oxcarbazepine: possible role of dopaminergic neurotransmission.

It has been previously shown that oxcarbazepine (OXCBZ), a keto-analogue of carbamazepine, exhibits an antidepressive-like effect profile in the learned helplessness and forced swimming test (FST). Since carbamazepine possesses dopaminergic effect, the present study was carried out to evaluate the extent to which the antidepressive effect of OXCBZ might be mediated by dopaminergic system. Thus, the effects of OXCBZ in haloperidol-induced catalepsy and apomorphine-induced stereotypy were studied. The anti-immobility effect of OXCBZ in the FST was also evaluated in haloperidol pre-treated rats. OXCBZ (40 and 80 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently reduced the catalepsy induced by haloperidol (2.0 mg/kg, i.p.). Moreover, OXCBZ (80 mg/kg, but not 20 or 40 mg/kg, i.p.) increased the intensity of apomorphine-induced stereotypy (0.6 mg/kg, s.c.). Finally, it was observed that the combination of OXCBZ (80 mg/kg, i. p.) and haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) antagonized the anti-immobility effect of OXCBZ and further increased the immobility time when compared to haloperidol alone. Haloperidol alone (0.5 or 1. 0 mg/kg) did not change the immobility time. Thus, these results suggest that OXCBZ could enhance dopaminergic neurotransmission, which might mediate its antidepressive-like effect.     

Haloperidol-induced catalepsy is absent in dopamine D(2), but maintained in dopamine D(3) receptor knock-out mice

We have previously found that mice homozygous for the deletion of the dopamine D(2) receptor gene (D(2)(-/-) mice) do not present spontaneous catalepsy when tested in a "bar test". In the present study, we sought to analyse the reactivity of D(2) receptor mutant mice to the cataleptogenic effects of dopamine D(2)-like or D(1)-like receptor antagonists. In parallel, we assessed the cataleptogenic effects of these antagonists in dopamine D(3) receptor mutant mice. D(2)(-/-) mice were totally unresponsive to the cataleptogenic effects of the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist haloperidol (0.125-2 mg/kg i.p.), while D(2)(+/-) mice, at the highest haloperidol doses tested, showed a level of catalepsy about half that of wild-type controls. The degree of haloperidol-induced catalepsy was thus proportional to the level of striatal dopamine D(2) receptor expression (0.50, 0.30 and 0.08 pmol/mg protein as measured at 0.25 nM [3H]spiperone for D(2)(+/+), D(2)(+/-) and D(2)(-/-) mice, respectively). However, D(2)(-/-) and D(2)(+/-) mice were as sensitive as their wild-type counterparts to the cataleptogenic effects of the dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonist R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH 23390: 0.03-0.6 mg/kg s.c.). Striatal dopamine D(1) receptor expression (as measured using [3H]SCH 23390 binding) was not significantly affected by the genotype. The ability of SCH 23390 to induce catalepsy in D(2)(-/-) mice suggests that their resistance to haloperidol-induced catalepsy is due to the absence of dopamine D(2) receptors, and not to the abnormal striatal synaptic plasticity that has been shown by others to occur in these mice. In agreement with the observation that dopamine D(2) and dopamine D(1) receptor expression was essentially identical in D(3)(+/+), D(3)(+/-) and D(3)(-/-) mice, dopamine D(3) receptor homozygous and heterozygous mutant mice, on the whole, did not differ from their controls in the time spent in a cataleptic position following administration of either haloperidol (0.5-2 mg/kg i.p.) or SCH 23390 (0.03-0.6 mg/kg s.c.). Also, dopamine D(3) receptor mutant mice were no more responsive than wild-type controls when co-administered subthreshold doses of haloperidol (0.125 mg/kg) and SCH 23390 (0.03 mg/kg), suggesting that dopamine D(3) receptor knock-out mice are not more sensitive than wild-types to the synergistic effects of concurrent blockade of dopamine D(2) and dopamine D(1) receptors in this model. These results suggest that the dopamine D(2) receptor subtype is necessary for haloperidol to produce catalepsy, and that the dopamine D(3) receptor subtype appears to exert no observable control over the catalepsy produced by dopamine D(2)-like, D(1)-like and the combination of D(1)-like and D(2)-like receptor antagonists.