Comparison of diagnostic ability between 99mTc-MDP bone scan and 18F-FDG PET/CT for bone metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic ability of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with that of ^99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (^99mTc-MDP) bone scan for bone metastasis in staging patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

Ninety-five patients with SCLC who underwent both ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ^99mTc-MDP bone scan for initial staging work-up were retrospectively enrolled. All ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and bone scan images were visually assessed. Bone metastasis was confirmed by histopathological results and all available clinical information.

Results

Of 95 patients with SCLC, metastatic bone lesions were found in 30 patients, and 84 metastatic lesions were evaluated on a lesion-basis analysis. The sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was 100?% on a per-patient basis and 87?% on a per-lesion basis, and there was no false-positive lesion on PET/CT images. In contrast, the sensitivity of the bone scan was 37?% on a per-patient basis and 29?% on a per-lesion basis. The bone scan showed 11 false-positive lesions. The bone scan detected two metastatic lesions that were not detected by PET/CT, which were outside the region scanned by PET/CT. On follow-up bone scan, 21 lesions that were not detected by the initial bone scan but were detected by PET/CT were newly detected.

Conclusions

In patients with SCLC, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT showed higher detection rate of bone metastasis than ^99mTc-MDP bone scan. Thus, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can replace bone scan in staging patients with SCLC.     

Usefulness of 18F-fluoride PET/CT in Breast Cancer Patients with Osteosclerotic Bone Metastases

Purpose

Bone metastasis is an important factor for the treatment and prognosis of breast cancer patients. Whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBBS) can evaluate skeletal metastases, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT seems to exhibit high specificity and accuracy in detecting bone metastases. However, there is a limitation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in assessing sclerotic bone metastases because some lesions may be undetectable. Recent studies showed that ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is more sensitive than WBBS in detecting bone metastases. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT by comparing it with WBBS and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients with osteosclerotic skeletal metastases.

Materials and Methods

Nine breast cancer patients with suspected bone metastases (9 females; mean age ± SD, 55.6 ± 10.0 years) underwent ^99mTc-MDP WBBS, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT. Lesion-based analysis of five regions of the skeletons (skull, vertebral column, thoracic cage, pelvic bones and long bones of extremities) and patient-based analysis were performed.

Results

¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and WBBS detected 49, 20 and 25 true metastases, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT were 94.2 %, 46.3 %, 57.7 % and 91.2 %, respectively. Most true metastatic lesions on ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT had osteosclerotic change (45/49, 91.8 %), and only four lesions showed osteolytic change. Most lesions on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT also demonstrated osteosclerotic change (17/20, 85.0 %) with three osteolytic lesions. All true metastatic lesions detected on WBBS and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were identified on ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is superior to WBBS or ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in detecting osteosclerotic metastatic lesions. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT might be useful in evaluating osteosclerotic metastases in breast cancer patients.     

11C-Acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment

Purpose

We investigated the potential value of ¹¹C-acetate (ACT) PET/CT in characterizing multiple myeloma (MM) compared with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Bone marrow histological and whole-body (WB) MRI findings served as the reference standards.

Methods

In this prospective study, 15 untreated MM patients (10 men and 5 women, age range 48?69 years) underwent dual-tracer ¹¹C-ACT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and WB MRI for pretreatment staging, and 13 of them had repeated examinations after induction therapy. Diffuse and focal bone marrow uptake was assessed by visual and quantitative analyses, including measurement of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max). Between-group differences and correlations were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson test.

Results

At staging, all 15 patients had diffuse myeloma involvement upon bone marrow examination with 30–90 % of plasma cell infiltrates. Diffuse infiltration was detected in all of them (100 %) using ¹¹C-ACT with a positive correlation between bone marrow uptake values and percentages of plasma cell infiltrates (r = +0.63, p?=?0.01). In contrast, a diagnosis of diffuse infiltration could be established using ¹⁸F-FDG in only six patients (40 %). Focal lesions were shown in 13 patients on both ¹¹C-ACT PET/CT and WB MRI, and in 10 patients on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Focal lesions demonstrated ¹¹C-ACT uptake with a mean SUV_max of 11.4 ± 3.3 (range 4.6?19.6, n?=?59), which was significantly higher than the ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (mean SUV_max 6.6 ± 3.1, range 2.3?13.7, n?=?29; p?<?0.0001). After treatment, the diffuse bone marrow ¹¹C-ACT uptake showed a mean SUV_max reduction of 66 % in patients with at least a very good partial response versus 34 % in those with at most a partial response only (p?=?0.01).

Conclusion

PET/CT using ¹¹C-ACT as a biomarker showed a higher detection rate for both diffuse and focal myeloma lesions at diagnosis than using ¹⁸F-FDG, and may be valuable for response assessment.     

Clinical significance of 18F-α-methyl tyrosine PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI

Objective

L-3-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-α-methyl tyrosine (¹⁸F-FAMT) is an amino acid tracer for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) which specifically transported into cancer cells by L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1). LAT1 overexpression in tumors is significantly correlated with cell proliferation and angiogenesis. ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared for their diagnostic performance in the detection of bone marrow invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with OSCC on the upper or lower alveolar ridge underwent staging by MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT studies before surgery. Post-surgical pathologic examination was used as the standard to determine the final diagnoses. The possibility of bone marrow invasion on MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT were usually graded retrospectively into five-point score. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated according to the obtained scores.

Results

As the sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was highest (100 %) among that of MRI (95 %) and ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT (90 %), the specificity of ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT was highest (85.7 %) among that of MRI (57 %) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (14.3 %). The size of pathological tumor was accorded with that detected by ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT and was smaller than that detected by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (P < 0.01). Significant difference was not found between ¹⁸F-FAMT PET tumor volume and pathological tumor volume.

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT was useful and more specific than MRI or ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of bone marrow invasion of OSCC and may contribute to minimize the extent of resection in oral surgery patient.     

Comparison of 18F-DOPA, 18F-FDG and 68Ga-somatostatin analogue PET/CT in patients with recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate and compare ¹⁸F-FDG, ¹⁸F-DOPA and ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogues for PET/CT in patients with residual/recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) suspected on the basis of elevated serum calcitonin levels.

Methods

Included in the study were 18 patients with recurrent MTC in whom functional imaging with the three tracers was performed. The PET/CT results were compared on a per-patient basis and on a per-lesion-basis.

Results

At least one focus of abnormal uptake was observed on PET/CT in 13 patients with ¹⁸F-DOPA (72.2% sensitivity), in 6 patients with ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogues (33.3%) and in 3 patients with ¹⁸F-FDG (16.7%) (p?18F-DOPA and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (p?18F-DOPA and ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogue PET/CT (p?=?0.04). Overall, 72 lesions were identified on PET/CT with the three tracers. ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT detected 85% of lesions (61 of 72), ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogue PET/CT 20% (14 of 72) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT 28% (20 of 72). There was a statistically significant difference in the number of lymph node, liver and bone lesions detected with the three tracers (p?18F-DOPA PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (p?18F-DOPA PET/CT and ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogue PET/CT (p?Conclusion ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT seems to be the most useful imaging method for detecting recurrent MTC lesions in patients with elevated serum calcitonin levels, performing better than ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogue PET/CT. ¹⁸F-FDG may complement ¹⁸F-DOPA in patients with an aggressive tumour.     

Treatment response evaluation with <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

Aim

The aim of this study was to assess the combined use of the radiotracers ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-NaF in treatment response evaluation of a group of multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) by means of static (whole-body) and dynamic PET/CT (dPET/CT).

Patients and methods

Thirty-four patients with primary, previously untreated MM scheduled for treatment with HDT followed by ASCT were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent PET/CT scanning with ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-NaF before and after therapy. Treatment response by means of PET/CT was assessed according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1999 criteria. The evaluation of dPET/CT studies was based on qualitative evaluation, semi-quantitative (SUV) calculation, and quantitative analysis based on two-tissue compartment modelling and a non-compartmental approach leading to the extraction of fractal dimension (FD).

Results

An analysis was possible in 29 patients: three with clinical complete response (CR) and 26 with non-CR (13 patients near complete response-nCR, four patients very good partial response-VGPR, nine patients partial response-PR). After treatment, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was negative in 14/29 patients and positive in 15/29 patients, showing a sensitivity of 57.5 % and a specificity of 100 %. According to the EORTC 1999 criteria, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-based treatment response revealed CR in 14 patients (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT CR), PR in 11 patients (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT PR) and progressive disease in four patients (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT PD). In terms of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT, 4/29 patients (13.8 %) had a negative baseline scan, thus failed to depict MM. Regarding the patients for which a direct lesion-to-lesion comparison was feasible, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT depicted 56 of the 129 ¹⁸F-FDG positive lesions (43 %). Follow-up ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT showed persistence of 81.5 % of the baseline ¹⁸F-NaF positive MM lesions after treatment, despite the fact that 64.7 % of them had turned to ¹⁸F-FDG negative. Treatment response according to ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT revealed CR in one patient (¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT CR), PR in five patients (¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT PR), SD in 12 patients (¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT SD), and PD in seven patients (¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT PD). Dynamic ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT studies showed that SUV_average, SUV_max, as well as the kinetic parameters K₁, influx and FD from reference bone marrow and skeleton responded to therapy with a significant decrease (p?<?0.001).

Conclusion

F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.7 % and a specificity of 100 % in treatment response evaluation of MM. Despite its limited sensitivity, the performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was satisfactory, given that 6/9 false negative patients in follow-up scans (66.7 %) were clinically characterized as nCR, a disease stage with very low tumor mass. On the other hand, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT does not seem to add significantly to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in treatment response evaluation of MM patients undergoing HDT and ASCT, at least shortly after therapy.

     

18F-FDG PET/CT bone/bone marrow findings in Hodgkin’s lymphoma may circumvent the use of bone marrow trephine biopsy at diagnosis staging

Purpose

Accurate staging of Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is necessary in selecting appropriate treatment. Bone marrow trephine biopsy (BMB) is the standard procedure for depicting bone marrow involvement. BMB is invasive and explores a limited part of the bone marrow. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is now widely used for assessing response to therapy in HL and a baseline study is obtained to improve accuracy. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether routine BMB remains necessary with concomitant ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

Methods

Data from 83 patients (newly diagnosed HL) were reviewed. All patients had received contrast-enhanced CT, BMB and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Results of BMB were not available at the time of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Results

Seven patients had lymphomatous involvement on BMB. Four patients had bone involvement on conventional CT (two with negative BMB). All patients with bone marrow and/or bone lesions at conventional staging were also diagnosed on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan. PET/CT depicted FDG-avid bone/bone marrow foci in nine additional patients. Four of them had only one or two foci, while the other had multiple foci. However, the iliac crest, site of the BMB, was not involved on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Osteolytic/sclerotic lesions matching FDG-avid foci were visible on the CT part of PET/CT in three patients. MRI ordered in three other patients suggested bone marrow involvement. Interim and/or end-therapy ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT documented response of FDG-avid bone/bone marrow foci to chemotherapy in every patient.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT highly improves sensitivity for diagnosis of bone/bone marrow lesions in HL compared to conventional staging.     

PET/CT studies of multiple myeloma using 18 F-FDG and 18 F-NaF: comparison of distribution patterns and tracers’ pharmacokinetics

Objective

The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the combined use of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸?F-FDG) and fluorine-18 sodium fluoride (¹⁸?F-NaF) PET/CT in the skeletal assessment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and to compare the efficacy of these two PET tracers regarding detection of myeloma-indicative osseous lesions.

Patients and methods

The study includes 60 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) diagnosed according to standard criteria. All patients underwent dynamic (dPET/CT) scanning of the pelvis as well as whole body PET/CT studies with both tracers. The interval between the two exams was one day. Sites of focal increased ¹⁸?F-FDG uptake were considered as highly suspicious of myelomatous involvement. The lesions detected on the ¹⁸?F-NaF PET/CT scans were then correlated with those detected on ¹⁸?F-FDG PET/CT, which served as a reference. Moreover, the ¹⁸?F-FDG PET/CT results were also correlated with the low-dose CT findings. The evaluation of dPET/CT studies was based on qualitative evaluation, SUV calculation, and quantitative analysis based on a 2-tissue compartment model and a non-compartmental approach.

Results

Whole body ¹⁸?F-FDG PET/CT revealed approximately 343 focal lesions while ¹⁸?F-NaF PET/CT revealed 135 MM-indicative lesions (39 % correlation). CT demonstrated 150 lesions that correlated with those in ¹⁸?F-FDG PET/CT (44 % correlation). Six patients demonstrated a diffuse pattern of disease with ¹⁸?F-FDG, while 15 of them had a mixed (diffuse and focal) pattern of skeletal ¹⁸?F-FDG uptake. A high number of degenerative, traumatic and arthritic disease lesions were detected with ¹⁸?F-NaF PET/CT. In three patients with multiple focal ¹⁸?F-FDG-uptake, ¹⁸?F-NaF PET/CT failed to demonstrate any bone lesion. The dPET/CT scanning of the pelvic area with ¹⁸?F-FDG and ¹⁸?F-NaF revealed 77 and 24 MM-indicative lesions, respectively. Kinetic analysis of ¹⁸?F-FDG revealed the following mean values: SUV_aver?=?5.1, k₁?=?0.37 (1/min), k₃?=?0.10 (1/min), V_B?=?0.06, influx?=?0.04 (1/min), FD?=?1.28; the respective values for ¹⁸?F-NaF were SUV_average?=?10.7, k₁?=?0.25 (1/min), k₃?=?0.34 (1/min), V_B?=?0.02, influx?=?0.10 (1/min), FD?=?1.37. Apart from the correlation between V_B of ¹⁸?F-FDG and k₁ of ¹⁸?F-NaF (r?=?0.54), no other significant correlation was observed between the two tracers’ kinetic parameters. We found a significant correlation between FD and SUV_average (r?=?0.93), FD and SUV_max (r?=?0.80), FD and influx ( r?=?0.85), as well as between influx and SUV_average (r?=?0.74) for ¹⁸?F-FDG. In ¹⁸?F-NaF we observed the most significant correlations between FD and SUV_average (r?=?0.97), FD and SUV_max (r?=?0.87), and between influx and k₁ (r?=?0.72).

Conclusion

The combined use of ¹⁸?F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸?F-NaF PET/CT provides different molecular information regarding the biological processes that take place in a MM osseous lesion. ¹⁸?F-FDG PET/CT proved to be a more specific biomarker than ¹⁸?F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma skeletal assessment.     

18F-FDG和99Tcm-MDP显像诊断多发性骨髓瘤骨病的对比研究

目的 对比研究18F-FDG PET/CT和99Tcm-亚甲基二膦酸盐（99Tcm-MDP）SPECT全身骨显像对多发性骨髓瘤骨病（MBD）的诊断价值。 方法 回顾性分析2015年4月至2018年5月在安徽医科大学附属安庆医院经临床确诊的29例多发性骨髓瘤初治患者,其中,男性18例、女性11例,年龄39~81（60.14±10.41）岁。所有患者均于两周内先后行18F-FDG PET/CT显像及99Tcm-MDP SPECT全身骨显像,对比分析18F-FDG PET/CT和99Tcm-MDP SPECT显像检出的骨异常改变,对两种显像方法检出MBD例数的比较采用配对资料的χ2检验。 结果 29例多发性骨髓瘤患者均伴发MBD,18F-FDG PET/CT显像阳性者28例（骨骼局灶型摄取显像剂18例,弥漫型骨髓摄取1例,混合型摄取9例）,99Tcm-MDP SPECT骨显像阳性21例（表现为骨骼单发或多发放射性浓聚灶）,阳性符合率分别为96.6%（28/29）和72.4%（21/29）,差异有统计学意义（χ2=5.0,P<0.05）。 结论 18F-FDG PET/CT显像比99Tcm-MDP SPECT全身骨显像对MBD的探测更为灵敏,且对骨髓浸润及髓外侵犯亦具有良好的诊断效能。     

Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography

Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of an all-in-one protocol of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography with the diagnostic accuracy of a multimodality algorithm for initial breast cancer staging. METHODS: Forty women (mean age, 58.3 y; range, 30.8-78.4 y; SD, 12 y) with suspected breast cancer were included. For the primary tumor, we compared 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography versus MRI mammography; for axillary lymph node status, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus clinical investigation and ultrasound; and for distant metastases, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus a multimodality staging algorithm. Histopathology and clinical follow-up served as the standard of reference. The Fisher exact test evaluated the significance of differences (P < 0.05). Alterations in patient management caused by 18F-FDG PET/CT were documented. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the detection rate of breast cancer lesions (18F-FDG PET/CT, 95%; MRI, 100%; P = 1). 18F-FDG PET/CT correctly classified lesion focality significantly more often than did MRI (18F-FDG PET/CT, 79%; MRI, 73%; P < 0.001). MRI correctly defined the T stage significantly more often than did 18F-FDG PET/CT (MRI, 77%; 18F-FDG PET/CT, 54%; P = 0.001). 18F-FDG PET/CT detected axillary lymph node metastases in 80% of cases; clinical investigation/ultrasound, in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.067). Distant metastases were detected with 18F-FDG PET/CT in 100% of cases, and the multimodality algorithm identified distant metastases in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 1). Three patients had extraaxillary lymph node metastases that were detected only by PET/CT (cervical, retroperitoneal, mediastinal/internal mammary group). 18F-FDG PET/CT changed patient management in 12.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography protocol may be used for staging breast cancer in a single session. This initial assessment of the 18F-FDG PET/CT protocol indicates similar accuracy to MRI for the detection of breast cancer lesions. Although MRI seems to be more accurate when assessing the T stage of the tumor, 18F-FDG PET/CT seems able to more accurately define lesion focality. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography was able to detect axillary lymph node metastases with a high sensitivity, this method cannot soon be expected to replace the combination of clinical examination, ultrasound, and sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary assessment.     

Comparisons between glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose and 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer patients with bone lesions

AIM: To compare 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-D-glucose(¹⁸F-FDG) and ¹⁸F-sodium (¹⁸F-NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) accuracy in breast cancer patients with clinically/radiologically suspected or known bone metastases.METHODS: A total of 45 consecutive patients with breast cancer and the presence or clinical/biochemical or radiological suspicion of bone metastatic disease underwent ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT. Imaging results were compared with histopathology when available, or clinical and radiological follow-up of at least 1 year. For each technique we calculated: Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), overall accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, error rate, and Youden’s index. McNemar’s χ² test was used to test the difference in sensitivity and specificity between the two diagnostic methods. All analyses were computed on a patient basis, and then on a lesion basis, with consideration ofthe density of independent lesions on the co-registered CT (sclerotic, lytic, mixed, no-lesions) and the divergent site of disease (skull, spine, ribs, extremities, pelvis). The impact of adding ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT to the work-up of patients was also measured in terms of change in their management due to ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT findings.RESULTS: The two imaging methods of ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT were significantly different at the patient-based analysis: Accuracy was 86.7% and 84.4%, respectively (McNemar’s χ² = 6.23, df = 1, P = 0.01). Overall, 244 bone lesions were detected in our analysis. The overall accuracy of the two methods was significantly different at lesion-based analysis (McNemar’s χ² = 93.4, df = 1, P < 0.0001). In the lesion density-based and site-based analysis, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provided more accurate results in the detection of CT-negative metastasis (P < 0.002) and vertebral localizations (P < 0.002); ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT was more accurate in detecting sclerotic (P < 0.005) and rib lesions (P < 0.04). ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT led to a change of management in 3 of the 45 patients (6.6%) by revealing findings that were not detected at ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.CONCLUSION: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a reliable imaging tool in the detection of bone metastasis in most cases, with a diagnostic accuracy that is slightly, but significantly, superior to that of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT in the general population of breast cancer patients. However, the extremely high sensitivity of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT can exploit its diagnostic potential in specific clinical settings (i.e., small CT-evident sclerotic lesions, high clinical suspicious of relapse, and negative ¹⁸F-FDG PET and conventional imaging).     

Whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT in the assessment of bone lesions in oncological patients: initial results

Objectives

To compare [¹⁸?F]FDG PET/MRI with PET/CT for the assessment of bone lesions in oncologic patients.

Methods

This prospective study included 67 patients with solid tumours scheduled for PET/CT with [¹⁸?F]FDG who also underwent a whole-body PET/MRI scan. The datasets (PET/CT, PET/MRI) were rated by two readers regarding lesion conspicuity (four-point scale) and diagnostic confidence (five-point scale). Median scores were compared using the Wilcoxon test.

Results

Bone metastases were present in ten patients (15 %), and benign bone lesions in 15 patients (22 %). Bone metastases were predominantly localized in the pelvis (18 lesions, 38 %) and the spine (14 lesions, 29 %). Benign bone lesions were exclusively osteosclerotic and smaller than the metastases (mean size 6 mm vs. 23 mm). While PET/CT allowed identification of 45 of 48 bone metastases (94 %), PET/MRI allowed identification of all bone metastases (100 %). Conspicuity of metastases was high for both modalities with significantly better results using PET/MRI (p?<?0.05). Diagnostic confidence in lesion detection was high for both modalities without a significant difference. In benign lesions, conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were significantly higher with PET/CT (p?<?0.05).

Conclusions

[¹⁸?F]FDG PET/MRI shows high potential for the assessment of bone metastases by offering superior lesion conspicuity when compared to PET/CT. In hypersclerotic, benign bone lesions PET/CT still sets the reference.

Key Points

? PET/MRI and PET/CT are of equal value for the identification of disease-positive patients ? PET/MRI offers higher lesion conspicuity as well as diagnostic confidence ? PET/MRI is an attractive new alternative for the assessment of bone metastases     

Pictorial review of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT findings in musculoskeletal lesions

We herein reviewed ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) findings in a number of musculoskeletal lesions including malignant tumors, benign tumors, and tumor-like lesions with correlations to other radiographic imaging modalities, and described the diversity of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT findings of this entity. Malignant primary musculoskeletal tumors are typically ¹⁸F-FDG avid, whereas low-grade malignant tumors show mild uptake. Benign musculoskeletal tumors generally show a faint uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG, and tumor-like conditions also display various uptake patterns of ¹⁸F-FDG. Although musculoskeletal tumors show various uptakes of ¹⁸F-FDG on PET/CT, its addition to morphological imaging modalities such as CT and MRI is useful for the characterization and differentiation of musculoskeletal lesions.     

State of the art imaging of multiple myeloma: Comparative review of FDG PET/CT imaging in various clinical settings

18-Flurodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have higher sensitivity and specificity than whole-body X-ray (WBXR) survey in evaluating disease extent in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Both modalities are now recommended by the Durie–Salmon Plus classification although the emphasis is more on MRI than PET/CT. The presence of extra-medullary disease (EMD) as evaluated by PET/CT imaging, initial SUV_max and number of focal lesions (FL) are deemed to be strong prognostic parameters at staging. MRI remains the most sensitive technique for the detection of diffuse bone marrow involvement in both the pre and post-therapy setting. Compression fractures are best characterized with MRI signal changes, for determining vertebroplasty candidates. While PET/CT allows for earlier and more specific evaluation of therapeutic efficacy compared to MRI, when signal abnormalities persist years after treatment. PET/CT interpretation, however, can be challenging in the vertebral column and pelvis as well as in cases with post-therapy changes. Hence, a reading approach combining the high sensitivity of MRI and superior specificity of FDG PET/CT would be preferred to increase the diagnostic accuracy. In summary, the established management methods in MM, mainly relying on biological tumor parameters should be complemented with functional imaging data, both at staging and restaging for optimal management of MM.     

18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET in patients with biochemical evidence of medullary thyroid cancer: relation to tumor differentiation.

Curative treatment for recurrent medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), diagnosed by rising serum calcitonin, is surgery, but tumor localization is difficult. Therefore, the value of 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET (18F-DOPA PET), 18F-FDG PET, (99m)Tc-V-di-mercaptosulfuricacid (DMSA-V) scintigraphy, and MRI or CT was studied. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with biochemical recurrent or residual MTC underwent 18F-DOPA PET, 18F-FDG PET, DMSA-V scintigraphy, and MRI or CT. Patient- and lesion-based sensitivities were calculated using a composite reference consisting of all imaging modalities. RESULTS: In 76% of all patients with MTC, one or more imaging modalities was positive for MTC lesions. In 6 of 8 patients with a calcitonin level of <500 ng/L, imaging results were negative. In 15 patients with positive imaging results, 18F-DOPA PET detected 13 (sensitivity, 62%; with 4.6 lesions per patient [lpp]). Morphologic imaging (n = 19) was positive in 7 (sensitivity, 37%; 4.7 lpp), DMSA-V (n = 18) in 5 (sensitivity, 28%; 1.1 lpp), and 18F-FDG PET (n = 17) in 4 (sensitivity, 24%; 1.6 lpp). In a lesion-based analysis, 18F-DOPA PET detected 95 of 134 lesions (sensitivity, 71%), morphologic imaging detected 80 of 126 (sensitivity, 64%), DMSA-V detected 20 of 108 (sensitivity, 19%), and 18F-FDG PET detected 48 of 102 (sensitivity, 30%). In 2 of 3 patients with a calcitonin/carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) doubling time of < or =12 mo, 18F-FDG PET performed better than 18FDOPA PET; in the third patient, 18F-FDG PET was not performed. CONCLUSION: MTC lesions are best detectable when serum calcitonin was >500 ng/L. 18F-DOPA PET is superior to 18F-FDG PET, DMSA-V, and morphologic imaging. With short calcitonin doubling times (< or =12 mo), 18F-FDG PET may be superior.     

Comparative diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT versus whole-body MRI for determination of remission status in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic performance of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) versus ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for determination of remission status in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after stem cell transplantation (SCT).

Methods

Thirty-one patients were examined by both WBMRI and PET/CT after SCT. Imaging results and clinical remission status as determined by the clinical gold standard (Uniform Response Criteria) were compared.

Results

One hundred four lesions were detected in 21 patients. PET/CT had a sensitivity of 50.0 %, a specificity of 85.7 %, a positive predictive value of 62.5 %, a negative predictive value of 78.3 %, and an overall accuracy of 74.2 % for determination of remission status. MRI had a sensitivity of 80.0 %, a specificity of 38.1 %, a positive predictive value of 38.1 %, a negative predictive value of 80 %, and an overall accuracy of 51.6 %. Concordant results were observed in only 12 (11.5 %) of the 104 lesions.

Conclusions

In the post-treatment setting, both FDG PET/CT and WBMRI provide information about the extent of disease, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of persisting or recurrent myeloma. MRI may often be false positive because of persistent non-viable lesions. Therefore, PET/CT might be more suitable than MRI for determination of remission status.

Key Points

• Both whole-body MRI and ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT are now used for assessing multiple myeloma

• Both investigations may visualise residual or recurrent disease after stem cell transplantation

• MRI may give false-positive results because of persistent inactive lesions

     

多发性骨髓瘤的18F-FDGPET/CT诊断

目的:多发性骨髓瘤是一种浆细胞恶性增殖性疾病,大约有80％的患者存在骨骼侵犯.本文探讨多发性骨髓瘤的18F-fluorodexoxyglucose(18F-FDG)PET/CT表现特点,提高对多发性骨髓瘤的认识.方法:26例按2001年WHO诊断标准确诊为多发性骨髓瘤的患者,均在治疗前行18F-FDG PET/CT显像.所有患者均依赖骨髓穿刺或活检取得明确病理学诊断.结果:26名患者均出现不同程度的骨质疏松.25例患者出现多发性骨质破坏,占总数的96.2％;其中11例患者出现颅骨破坏,占42.3％;25例出现脊柱骨质破坏,占96.2％;15例出现胸骨骨质破坏,占57.7％;21例出现肋骨骨质破坏,占80.8％;21例出现骨盆骨质破坏,占80.8％.部分骨破坏病灶呈18F-FDG高代谢灶.结论:多发性骨髓瘤的18F-FDG PET/CT表现具有一定特征,结合临床、影像、实验室和病理学检查能提高本病的诊断率.     

Chemokine receptor-4 targeted PET/CT with 68 Ga-Pentixafor in assessment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: comparison to 18 F-FDG PET/CT

18F-FDG PET/CT has some limitations in the evaluation of multiple myeloma (MM). Since chemokine receptor-4 is overexpressed in MM, we perform a prospective cohort study to compare the performance of 68Ga-Pentixafor and 18F-FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed MM. Thirty patients with newly diagnosed MM were recruited. All patients underwent 68Ga-Pentixafor and18F-FDG PET/CT within 1 week after enrollment. A positive PET/CT was defined as the presence of focal PET-positive lesions in bone marrow or diffuse bone marrow patterns (uptake > liver). Bone marrow uptake values in 68Ga-Pentixafor and18F-FDG PET/CT (total bone marrow glycolysis [TBmGFDG], total bone marrow uptake with 68Ga-Pentixafor [TBmUCXCR4], total bone marrow volume [TBmV], SUVmean, and SUVmax) were obtained by drawing total bone marrow volume of interest on PET/CT. The positive rates of the PET/CT scans were statistically compared, and the correlation between quantitative bone marrow uptake values and clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and staging was analyzed. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT had a higher positive rate than 18F-FDG PET/CT in recruited patients (93.3 vs. 53.3%, p = 0.0005). In quantitative analysis, bone marrow uptake values in 68Ga-Pentixafor (TBmUCXCR4, SUVmax, and SUVmean) were positively correlated with end organ damage, staging, and laboratory biomarkers related to tumor burden including serum β2-microglobulin, serum free light chain, and 24-h urine light chain (p < 0.05). In 18F-FDG PET/CT, only the SUVmean of total bone marrow was positively correlated with serum free light chain and 24-h urine light chain (p < 0.05). 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT is promising in assessment of newly diagnosed MM. NCT 03436342     

Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Evaluation of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Purpose

To assess the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the detection of bone marrow (BM) involvement of high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL).

Methods

One hundred twenty patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or peripheral T-cell lymphoma between January 2007 and June 2011, who received BM trephine biopsy and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before chemotherapy, were included in this retrospective study. We reviewed their ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) results. After reviewing the images, we reviewed the medical records and radiological findings of interesting patients.

Results

There were 23 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans in which the marrow was considered to be abnormal (either positive or equivocal), and 97 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were regarded as having negative FDG uptake. Of 120 patients, 100 (83.3 %) had a concordant result of BM interpretation between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and BMB, and the remaining 20 patients had discordant results. Among 23 patients with either positive or equivocal ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans, 1 of 12 patients with ‘positive’ ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had a lymphomatous involvement on BMB. In contrast, 10 of 11 patients with ‘equivocal’ BM hypermetabolism were reported as having positive involvement by BMB. Patients with abnormal ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had significantly higher mSUV_highest than those with normal FDG-PET/CT.

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and BMB are complementary techniques in assessing the presence of BM involvement in patients with high-grade NHL. The increasing availability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT will raise the need for additional biopsy for FDG-avid lesions, especially in patients with negative standard BMBs. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be useful as a decision-making tool for determining whether to perform a standard BMB or targeted biopsy to the FDG-avid lesion as an initial staging procedure. A direct bone biopsy for FDGpositive bone lesions should be included in staging guidelines in future. In ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-negative cases, BMB is still a powerful procedure, but BMB alone is insufficient for full evaluation of BM.     

Complementary roles of tumour specific PET tracer 18F-FAMT to 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of bone metastasis

Purpose

The usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for bone metastasis evaluation has already been established. The amino acid PET tracer [¹⁸F]-3-fluoro-alpha-methyl tyrosine (¹⁸F-FAMT) has been reported to be highly specific for malignancy. We evaluated the additional value of ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT to complement ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastasis.

Methods

This retrospective study included 21 patients with bone metastases of various cancers who had undergone both ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT within 1 month of each other. ¹⁸F-FDG-avid bone lesions suspicious for malignancy were carefully selected based on the cut-off value for malignancy, and the SUVmax of the ¹⁸F-FAMT in the corresponding lesions were evaluated.

Results

A total of 72 ¹⁸F-FDG-positive bone lesions suspected to be metastases in the 21 patients were used as the reference standard. ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake was found in 87.5 % of the lesions. In the lesions of lung cancer origin, the uptake of the two tracers showed a good correlation (40 lesions, r?=?0.68, P?<?0.01). Bone metastatic lesions of oesophageal cancer showed the highest average of ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake. Bone metastatic lesions of squamous cell carcinoma showed higher ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake than those of adenocarcinoma. No significant difference in ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake was seen between osteoblastic and osteolytic bone metastatic lesions.

Conclusion

The usefulness of ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT for bone metastasis detection regardless of the lesion phenotype was demonstrated. The fact that ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake was confirmed by ¹⁸F-FDG uptake suggests that ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT has the potential to complement ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases.