Cardiovascular response to insertion of Brain''s laryngeal mask

This study was designed to investigate the cardiovascular effects related to insertion of the Brain laryngeal mask airway and to compare these effects with those after insertion of a Guedel oral airway. Arterial pressure and heart rate in 100 patients were measured using an Ohmeda 2300 Finapres arterial pressure monitor. Arterial pressure decreased significantly (p less than 0.001) and heart rate increased significantly (p less than 0.001) after induction of anaesthesia with 2.5 mg/kg of propofol. A significant increase in arterial pressure (p less than 0.02) and in heart rate (p less than 0.001) followed insertion of the laryngeal mask and the Guedel airway, with no difference between the two groups at any time. The changes in arterial pressure and heart rate returned to 'at insertion' levels within 60 seconds of the stimulus.     

The cardiovascular response to insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway

Sixty-one patients received a standardised anaesthetic and were randomly assigned to three groups: tracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation via an intubating laryngeal mask airway with immediate removal of the device, and tracheal intubation via an intubating laryngeal mask airway with delayed removal. The cardiovascular response to intubation was of a similar magnitude in all groups, although delayed removal of the intubating laryngeal mask airway was associated with a second pressor response. Norepinephrine changed significantly over time following direct laryngoscopy and following immediate removal of the intubating laryngeal mask airway, but not after delayed removal. The findings of this study do not support using the intubating laryngeal mask instead of direct laryngoscopy purely to decrease the response to intubation.     

The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion

The pressor response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation may be harmful to certain patients. The laryngeal mask airway avoids the need for laryngoscopy and allows positive pressure ventilation of the lungs in appropriate patients. This study compared the pressor response of tracheal intubation with that of mask insertion in two groups of 24 and 23 healthy patients respectively. All patients were anaesthetised with thiopentone, nitrous oxide, enflurane and paralysed with atracurium. We have shown a similar, but attenuated pattern of response associated with mask insertion in comparison with laryngoscopy and intubation; significant differences between the groups were evident in arterial diastolic blood pressure immediately after insertion and again 2 minutes later. Use of the laryngeal mask may therefore offer some limited advantages over tracheal intubation in the anaesthetic management of patients where the avoidance of the pressor response is of particular concern.     

Intubation through the laryngeal mask

Unexpected difficulty with tracheal intubation contributes to anaesthetic mortality. The laryngeal mask can almost always be placed satisfactorily and its position should facilitate blind intubation. A 6-mm cuffed tube will pass through both adult sizes of the mask and this study tested the feasibility of intubation through the mask. The effect of the application of cricoid pressure on the technique was also investigated. Intubation via the laryngeal mask was attempted in 100 routine patients: of the first 50 (group 1, no cricoid pressure), 45 (90%) were successfully intubated. Maintenance of cricoid pressure throughout the manoeuvre (group 2) reduced the success rate significantly to 56% (p less than 0.05). Despite the possibility that cricoid pressure may have to be interrupted momentarily, the ease with which the technique can be learnt, and the immediate availability of the necessary apparatus suggest that it should be considered for inclusion in failed intubation drill.     

The view of the glottis at laryngoscopy after unexpectedly difficult placement of the laryngeal mask

In 12 patients to whom a non-depolarising neuromuscular relaxant had been given and in whom placement of the laryngeal mask had failed unexpectedly, the view of the larynx at laryngoscopy and the ease of tracheal intubation were examined. The glottis was only partially seen at laryngoscopy in three patients and was not seen at all in another three patients. Tracheal intubation was difficult in three of them. It would appear that in some patients both placement of the laryngeal mask and tracheal intubation are difficult. It is thus inadvisable to paralyse patients electively and rely on the laryngeal mask to secure a clear airway when tracheal intubation is predicted to be difficult.     

Nasal fibreoptic tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients breathing via a modified laryngeal mask airway

A modified laryngeal mask airway was used to facilitate nasotracheal intubation with a fibreoptic laryngoscope. A size 4 laryngeal mask airway was modified by creating a defect at the base of the stem and removing the bars to allow passage of the fibreoptic laryngoscope from the nasopharynx to the larynx. The laryngeal mask airway cuff was split and the cut edges were sealed with silicone. This design allowed the cuff to function normally and allowed removal of the split laryngeal mask airway after the tracheal tube had been 'railroaded' into place. Thirty-four patients were studied. The split laryngeal mask airway was easily inserted with satisfactory airway maintenance in 32 patients. Nasal airway endoscopy and laryngoscopy were successfully achieved with the split laryngeal mask airway in place in 31 of 32 patients. Railroading the tracheal tube over the fibreoptic laryngoscope with the split laryngeal mask airway in place was successful in all 31 of these patients. This prototype split laryngeal mask airway allows good airway maintenance while fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation is performed.     

The intubating laryngeal mask Use in failed and difficult intubation

The use of the intubating laryngeal mask in three patients is described. In two patients for whom tracheal intubation using traditional techniques had failed, the intubating laryngeal mask was used to achieve successful tracheal intubation. The trachea of one of these patients was subsequently re-intubated for a second procedure using the same technique. A third patient with a cervical spine fracture whose trachea was electively intubated using the intubating laryngeal mask is also presented.     

Ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line head and neck stabilisation

We studied 40 anaesthetised and paralysed patients, in a randomised manner, to compare the ease of tracheal intubation either using a Macintosh laryngoscope and gum elastic bougie (group C) with the ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask using a fibreoptic bronchoscope (group L), during manual in-line stabilisation of the patient's head and neck. In both groups, a maximum of 120 s was allowed for attempts at tracheal intubation. The ease of placement of the intubating laryngeal mask or tracheal intubation was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). In patients in whom tracheal intubation succeeded, time for intubation was measured. The intubating laryngeal mask was placed successfully in 19 of 20 patients, with the median VAS of 18 mm (95% CI: 13-32 mm). The success rate of tracheal intubation in group L (17 patients) was significantly higher than in group C (nine patients) (p < 0.01), tracheal intubation in group L was significantly easier than intubation in group C (p < 0.001; 95% CI for difference in VAS: 18-68 mm) and time taken for tracheal intubation was significantly shorter in group L than in group C (95% CI for difference: 8-50 s).     

The laryngeal mask airway

A prototype size 3 laryngeal mask was used in 100 patients by 18 anaesthetists with no previous experience of its use. A clear and unobstructed airway was obtained in 98% of patients, without requiring support of the jaw, thus leaving the anaesthetists' hands entirely free. The patency of the airway did not deteriorate during the course of the anaesthetic. In 10 patients there was obstruction of the airway at the first attempt to place it without the introducer and this obstruction appeared to be as a result of downfolding of the epiglottis. Subsequent attempts at passage were successful in all 10 patients. The seal between the mask and the larynx was adequate for artificial ventilation of the patients, but the mean leak pressure was 1.7 kPa.     

Complications following the use of the Combitube, tracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway

In a prospective, randomised trial, 75 patients scheduled for routine surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups to evaluate trauma and postoperative complications after insertion of the Combitube, tracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway. Insertion of the Combitube was associated with a higher incidence of sore throat (48% vs. 16% vs. 12% [p < 0.01]) and dysphagia (68% vs. 12% vs. 8% [p < 0.01]) compared with tracheal intubation or insertion of the laryngeal mask airway, respectively. Hoarseness was significantly less common in both the Combitube and the laryngeal mask groups (both 12%) than in the tracheal tube group (44%; p < 0.01). Haematoma occurred in 36% of the Combitube group compared with 4% in both the laryngeal mask and the tracheal tube groups (p < 0.01). The higher incidence of complications should be considered when using the Combitube.     

An unexpected complication of the intubating laryngeal mask

Fatal oesophageal perforation occurred as a complication of elective general anaesthesia for cataract extraction in a 77-year-old female patient. Tracheal intubation had been achieved, albeit with difficulty, in the course of a clinical trial of the intubating laryngeal mask.     

The Brain laryngeal mask airway An alternative to emergency tracheal intubation

The laryngeal mask airway was used to resuscitate a patient in whom direct and fibreoptic laryngoscopy were impossible because of cervical pathology and pulmonary oedema. The laryngeal mask airway may be an alternative to tracheal intubation in emergency resuscitation.     

Electroencephalographic arousal response during tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol

Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, or insertion of a laryngeal mask airway may lead to an arousal response on the electroencephalogram. We studied whether more intense stimulation (laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation) causes a greater arousal response than less intense stimulation (laryngeal mask airway insertion). Thirty-four patients (ASA I-II) were anaesthetised with propofol 3 mg.kg-1, followed by vecuronium 0.15 mg.kg-1 and a propofol infusion of 10 mg.kg-1.h-1. Three minutes after induction of anaesthesia, either laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (n = 18), or laryngeal mask airway insertion (n = 16) was performed. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation caused a significantly greater increase in blood pressure (but not heart rate) than laryngeal mask airway insertion (p < 0.05). Electroencephalogram responses were not different. More intense stimulation does not cause a greater arousal response during propofol anaesthesia.     

The use of cricoid pressure with the intubating laryngeal mask

Unexpected difficulty with tracheal intubation contributes to anaesthetic morbidity and mortality. The intubating laryngeal mask is effective in facilitating blind intubation. We have evaluated the effect of cricoid pressure on the ability to insert an intubating laryngeal mask, and to pass a tracheal tube through it. Insertion and intubation through the mask were attempted in 50 patients, Mallampati grade 1-3, randomly allocated to cricoid and noncricoid pressure groups. Tracheal intubation was successful in 21 (84%) of the noncricoid group and 13 (52%) of the cricoid group (p = 0.03). Cricoid pressure may have to be released to allow correct placement and intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask.     

A comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube with a standard tracheal tube for fibreoptic intubation

We conducted a prospective randomised study to compare the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube with a standard tube, for ease of tracheal intubation over a fibrescope. Thirty-six patients were investigated, using a sequential analysis technique. Ease of intubation was improved when the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube was used compared with the standard tube (p = 0.0009). Median (interquartile range [range]) intubation times (time from the tube's tip being level with the patient's teeth to successful placement) were 1.5 (1-2.3 [1-3]) s when the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube was used and 5 (3-7.3 [3-13]) s when the standard tube was used (p < 0.0001).     

The laryngeal mask airway

The laryngeal mask airway is an important addition to the anaesthetist's armamentarium, but its use is not without the possibility for misfortune. We encountered an unusual and potentially serious complication. A patient's epiglottis became trapped between the pliable grates in the mask portion of the laryngeal mask and partially obstructed his airway. Should this problem occur and remain unnoticed, in addition to the problem of airway obstruction during the anaesthetic, the oedematous epiglottis could be severely injured upon removal of the laryngeal mask. This, in turn, could result in airway obstruction requiring emergency treatment.