Prevalence of hepatitis G virus in liver disease.

The prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV) in liver disease of non-A, -B, -C viral hepatitis, hepatitis B and hepatitis C was determined. Two of 44 patients (4.5%) with liver injury without any hepatitis A, B or C marker were positive for HGV. One of five cases of hepatocellular carcinoma was positive for HGV. One of three cases with fulminant hepatitis was positive for HGV. This case was negative at the onset of fulminant hepatitis and became positive after plasmapheresis. No patient with acute (n=8) or chronic (n=5) hepatitis or liver cirrhosis (n=8) was positive for HGV in non-A, -B, -C liver disease. One of 30 patients with various HBV-positive liver diseases and nine (17.3) of 52 patients with type C liver disease were positive for HGV. In patients with hepatitis C, four (28.6%) of 14 HGV-co-infected patients were complicated with diabetes mellitus compared with four (10.5%) of 38 single hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients (not significant). In 12 HGV-positive patients, eight of 10 (80%) had a history of blood transfusion. In HCV-positive patients, co-infection with HGV was not a risk factor in patients with diabetes mellitus as a complication. HGV appeared to cause non-A, -B, -C hepatitis rarely, and its main route of infection was blood transfusion.     

Impact of hepatitis G virus co-infection on the course of hepatitis C virus infection before and after liver transplantation

Background/Aims: Hepatitis G virus (HGV), a new RNA virus that is parenterally transmitted, has frequently been found in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection but its role in chronic liver disease is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of HGV infection in transplantation patients infected with hepatitis C and to assess the impact of HGV co-infection on the course of HCV infection after liver transplantation.Methods: Eighty-nine liver transplantation recipients with persistent hepatitis C viremia detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated. Serum samples were tested before and after liver transplantation for HGV RNA by two different PCR methods: LC^TM assay (Abbott Laboratories) and an RT-PCR procedure which we developed using the silica gel technique for extraction of the HGV RNA. E2 antibodies were detected before orthotopic liver transplantation by an EIA-test. HCV RNA was quantified by branched DNA assay, and HCV genotype was determined. A mean of nine liver biopsy specimens were examined for each patient and the severity of the lesions was compared in HCV-positive patients with or without HGV co-infection.Results: The concordance between the two HGV RNA detection methods was excellent and the reproducibility of our RT-PCR procedure was confirmed. The prevalence of pretransplantation and posttransplantation HGV infection was 11% and 19%, respectively. Pretransplantation HGV infection was positively correlated with posttransplantation HGV infection (p<0.001). Before transplantation the E2 antibodies seroprevalence was 34%. Seven patients became HGV RNA positive after transplantation, but all of them were negative for E2 antibodies. Among the patients who remained RNA negative after liver transplantation, 40% were positive for E2 antibodies (p = 0.04). Pretransplantation clinical features (except AST mean value) were not different in patients with HCV and HGV co-infection and those with HCV only. After a mean follow-up of 34 months (range: 6 to 70), (75%) patients developed histological features of recurrent hepatitis but the frequency of the occurrence of graft hepatitis was not different between HGV/HCV co-infected patients and those with HCV alone (p=0.89). The mean interval from orthotopic liver transplantation to recurrence was 12.2 months (range: 3–63), which was not different for HVG/HVC-co-infected patients and HCV-infected patients. The histological severity of posttransplantation liver disease, and the graft and patient survival were not different for patients with and without HGV co-infection.Conclusions: Our results suggest the general persistence of HGV infection after liver transplantation, but HGV co-infection did not appear to influence the posttransplantation course of HCV infection. Before transplantation the prevalence of E2 antibodies was 34%, and our data clearly indicate that E2 antibodies were protective against HGV infection.     

Biochemical and histological features of hepatitis G virus infection

To assess the biochemical and histological characteristics of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection, we examined four patients who were infected with HGV only (HGV group), and compared them with 16 patients infected with both HGV and hepatitis C virus (HCV; HGV + HCV group) and 18 patients infected with HCV only (HCV group). Biochemical examination showed a significantly low level of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the HGV group, and that the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP)/ALT ratio in the same group was significantly higher than in the other two groups. Although all three patient groups had a similar degree of liver fibrosis, both the degree of periportal inflammation and total histological activity index were significantly lower in the HGV group than in the other two groups. Fibrous enlargement of the portal tract without lymphoid infiltration and thin fibrous septa was characteristically observed in the HGV group. No significant difference was found between the HGV + HCV group and HCV group. Our results suggest that biochemical and histological changes in HGV infection are very mild and quite different from those of HCV infection.     

Hepatitis G virus RNA and its relation to hepatitis C infection in adult haemophilic patients

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA were studied in 50 adult haemophilic patients who had received commercial clotting factors prior to 1980. HGV RNA was detectable in 6/50 patients (12%); 49/50 (98%) had antibody to HCV and 40/49 (82%) of these were viraemic with detectable HCV RNA; 5/6 patients with detectable HGV RNA had co-existing HCV infection and viraemia. The HGV PCR products from all six patients were directly sequenced and all were shown to be similar to that of HGV but more diverse from that of GB virus C. One patient who had persistent abnormal liver function tests had detectable HGV RNA but no evidence of hepatitis B or C. The presence of HGV RNA in the absence of hepatitis B and C infection indicates that this virus is capable of independent transmission. Independent response to interferon was demonstrated in one patient with co-infection who lost HGV but not HCV after interferon therapy.     

GB virus-C/hepatitis G virus infection in a hepatitis C virus endemic village: prevalence in residents with low educational attainment and frequent recovery in females

AIMS/BACKGROUND: GB virus-C/hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a newly identified flavivirus, which may share the same mode of transmission as hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to investigate associated factors of HGV infection and clearance in a HCV endemic village in southern Taiwan. METHODS: Five hundred and ninety-four residents of a village in southern Taiwan were enrolled for hepatitis virus screening. Clinical features were recorded and a questionnaire addressing the possible routes of transmission was filled in by the participating residents. RESULTS: The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B surface antigen in the 594 residents was 70.7% and 19.5% respectively. Of the 399 residents tested for HGV RNA, GB virus-C/Hepatitis G virus envelop 2 protein (HGV-E2) antibody, and HCV RNA, the prevalence was 13.5%, 25.3%, 53.1% respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low educational attainment was associated with HGV infection, old age and low educational attainment were associated with HCV infection, and female gender was associated with HGV clearance. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values were significantly higher for residents with HCV infection alone, HBV infection alone, and co-infection of HCV and HBV than for those without HBV, HCV, and HGV infection. There were no differences in ALT values between subjects with HGV infection alone and those without HBV, HCV, and HGV infections. Residents with co-infection of HGV and HBV, or HGV and HCV had ALT values similar to those with HBV or HCV infection alone. CONCLUSION: HGV infection is common in the HCV endemic village. The transmission of HGV is closely related to low educational attainment. HGV clearance is frequently encountered in females. Co-infection of HGV does not compound hepatocellular inflammation.     

The clinical significance of simultaneous infection with hepatitis G virus in patients with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a recently discovered member of the flavivirus family that has been associated with acute and chronic hepatitis. HGV infection has been reported to coexist in 10-20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The significance of simultaneous infection with HGV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains to be clarified, as do the effects on HGV of therapeutic interventions such as interferon treatment or liver transplantation. The aims of our study were: 1) to examine the frequency of HGV infection in the settings of liver transplantation and interferon therapy for hepatitis C; and 2) to compare HGV RNA levels before and after liver transplantation or interferon treatment. METHODS: Pre-treatment sera were available in 65 patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon; pretransplant sera were available in 49 patients transplanted for end stage liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis C. Information collected included age, sex, risk factors for hepatitis, concurrent liver disease, patient and allograft survival, biochemical response to interferon, histological activity index, and degree of fibrosis/cirrhosis. HCV genotyping was performed by sequencing the NS-5 region. HGV quantitation was performed using a research-based branched DNA (bDNA) assay with a set of probes directed at the 5' untranslated region. RESULTS: HGV was detected in 10 of 49 patients (20%) before transplant and in 13 of 65 patients (20%) treated with interferon. There was a female predominance among HGV-positive compared with HGV-negative transplant patients (80% vs 20%; p < 0.01), but such a difference was not observed in the interferon-treated group. Hepatic iron concentration was lower in hepatic explants from patients who were HGV-positive than in those who were HGV-negative (318 +/- 145 microg/g dry weight vs 1497 +/- 2202 microg/g dry weight; p = 0.02). HCV exposure after 1980 was more common in the HGV-positive patients than in those who were HGV-negative for the entire study population (10 of 20 [50%] vs 16 of 66 [24%]; p = 0.03), as well as for the nontransplant subgroup (8 of 12 [67%] vs 12 of 39 [31%]; p = 0.03). HGV RNA levels declined at 1 yr after transplant in seven of eight patients. Among nine patients tested during or after interferon treatment, HGV RNA levels declined from pretreatment levels in all and disappeared in three. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with either interferon or liver transplantation, the frequency of coinfection with HGV is about 20%. HGV may be a more recent virus in the US than HCV. Coinfection with HGV does not appear to affect the likelihood of response to interferon in patients with hepatitis C. Finally, HGV RNA levels appear to decline after both liver transplantation and interferon therapy, suggesting possible suppression by increased HCV replication in the former case, and a possible drug treatment effect in the latter.     

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on the progression of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infected patients

OBJECTIVES: To compare the rate of hepatic fibrosis progression in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV coinfected patients, and to identify factors that may influence fibrosis progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 153 HCV infected and 55 HCV-HIV coinfected patients were identified from two London hospitals. Eligible patients had known dates of HCV acquisition, were HCV-RNA positive, and had undergone a liver biopsy, which was graded using the Ishak score. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with fibrosis progression rate and the development of advanced fibrosis (stages 3 and 4). RESULTS: The estimated median fibrosis progression rate was 0.17 units/year (interquartile range (IQR) 0.10-0.25) in HIV-HCV coinfected and 0.13 (IQR 0.07-0.17) in HCV monoinfected patients (p=0.01), equating to an estimated time from HCV infection to cirrhosis of 23 and 32 years, respectively. Older age at infection (p<0.001), HIV positivity (p=0.019), higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (p=0.039), and higher inflammatory activity (p<0.001) on first biopsy were all independently associated with more rapid fibrosis progression. ALT was correlated with histological index (r=0.35, p<0.001). A CD4 cell count < or =250 x 10(6)/l was independently associated with advanced liver fibrosis (odds ratio 5.36 (95% confidence interval 1.26-22.79)) and was also correlated with a higher histological index (r=-0.42, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: HIV infection modifies the natural history of HCV by accelerating the rate of fibrosis progression by 1.4 fold, and the development of advanced fibrosis threefold. A low CD4 cell count was independently associated with advanced disease and correlated with higher histological index, which suggests that early antiretroviral therapy may be of benefit in slowing HCV progression in coinfected patients.     

PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HEPATITIS G VIRUS INFECTION IN ADULT BETA-THALASSAEMIA MAJOR PATIENTS

The risk of polytransfused patients for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is likely to extend to another recently identified member of the Flaviviridae, hepatitis G virus (HGV). We investigated the prevalence of HGV in 40 adult Italian patients with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia and evaluated the clinical significance of HGV infection. HGV-RNA was detected in 9/40 patients (22.5%). HGV infection was significantly associated with HCV viraemia ( P  =0.0012), with all patients positive for HGV being also viraemic for HCV. Overall, the clinical picture of patients with HCV/HGV co-infection was not different from that of patients with isolated HCV. However, patients co-infected with both viruses had lower values of alanine-transferase ( P  =0035) and a lower titre of HCV viraemia ( P  =0042) in the absence of other evident factors which could influence the clinical expression of HCV infection. In conclusion, HGV is highly prevalent among Italian polytransfused patients. No evidence of a clinically significant pathogenic role for HGV in liver disease could be found in these patients. In a subset of cases a possible interference of HGV with HCV infection was observed.     

Hepatitis G virus infection in Japanese haemophiliacs

The recently identified hepatitis G virus (HGV) (also known as GB virus-C) has been considered as a blood-transmissible agent. As many haemophiliacs have risk factors for infectious agents, to clarify the frequency of HGV infection is important. HGV-RNA was investigated in 77 Japanese haemophiliacs who had been treated with nonvirus-inactivated concentrates derived from pooled plasma. Detection of HGV-RNA was performed with a nested RT-PCR that recognizes the 5'-NCR of the HGV genome. HGV-RNA was detected in 19 (24.7%), including four (21.0%) infected with HGV alone, 12 (63.2%) co-infected with HCV and three (15.8%) who were HBV carriers. The patients infected with HGV alone showed a normal ALT level of 18.7 ± 4.1 IU L⁻¹. Most (36/37, 97.3%) of the patients with abnormal ALT levels had HCV-RNA. Patients infected with HCV alone or co-infected with HCV and HGV showed higher ALT levels of 108.8 ± 90.2 IU L⁻¹ ( n = 39) and 67.6 ± 62.6 IU L⁻¹ ( n = 11), respectively. However, there was no significant difference ( P = 0.16) in ALT levels between HCV infection alone and HCV/HGV co-infection. On the other hand, four of the patients who could be followed over 10 years showed HGV-RNA persistently. In two who underwent liver biopsy, the histological evidence showed no definitive fibrotic and necro-inflammatory changes. These results indicate that HGV infection has frequently occurred in haemophiliacs. It is possible that HGV infection does not cause aggressive hepatitis with elevated ALT levels, and that co-infection with HGV may not aggravate hepatitis caused by HCV.     

Hepatitis G infection and therapeutic response to interferon in HCV-related chronic liver disease.

Circulating HGV-RNA was determined in 117 patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease and in 200 healthy blood donors. The patients, aged 50.8+/-13.8 years, were classified as chronic hepatitis (CH; n = 82), liver cirrhosis (n = 25) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 10). HGV-RNA was detected in 5 (4.3%) patients, all with CH and in 10 (5%) of blood donors. The majority of all groups (52% to 70%) were infected with HCV genotype II/1b, including 4/5 patients with HGV co-infection. Of 5 patients with HGV co-infection, 4 were positive for anti-HBs and anti-HBc and none exhibited jaundice. A 24-week course of interferon treatment with 12-month follow-up was achieved in 27 patients with chronic active hepatitis, including 3 with HGV co-infection. Of these, 55.6% responded to the therapy, but only 6/27 (22.2%) patients were sustained responders. The majority of sustained responders were HCV genotype III/2a (4/6) while genotype II/1b was found in the majority of patients with relapse (7/9) and non-responders (9/12). At the 48- month follow up, 2/6 sustained responders (one with HGV co-infection) became HCV RNA positive. These results show that the prevalence of HGV infection in HCV-related chronic liver disease is low, as in the general population, and is found in younger patients with chronic hepatitis. HGV coinfection does not interfere with clinical severity, disease progression or response to interferon in patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease. The favorable factors ofinterferon treatment for HCV infection are young age, low HCV-RNA levels and HCV genotype III/2a.     

Long-term impact of renal transplantation on liver fibrosis during hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS: During hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, liver fibrosis progression after renal transplantation remains controversial. The aim of this cohort study with controls was to compare liver histopathologic features during HCV infection between renal transplant recipients and matched groups of hemodialyzed patients or controls without renal disease and untreated for HCV. METHODS: Each renal transplant recipient (group 1, n = 30) was matched at first liver biopsy (LB) using the main factors known to influence progression of fibrosis with one HCV hemodialyzed patient (group 2, n = 30) and one HCV-infected patient (nonhemodialyzed, nontransplanted; group 3, n = 30). Patients from group 1 were also matched with those of group 3 on the time between 2 consecutive LBs performed 37 months apart. LBs were evaluated according to the Knodell index, METAVIR score, and rate of fibrosis progression per year (fibrosis unit). RESULTS: The rate of fibrosis progression per year between the first and second LBs was significantly lower (P = 0.03) in group 1 (0.067; 95% confidence interval: -0.05, 0.18) than group 3 (0.20; 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 0.26). At the second LB, the Knodell index and activity or fibrosis in METAVIR were lower in group 1 than group 3 (4.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 7.5 +/- 0.6, 0.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.2, and 1.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.2 respectively, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that liver fibrosis progression is low in most HCV-infected renal transplant recipients with moderate liver disease at baseline.     

Natural history of hepatitis C virus infection: from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis, to hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis C is a heterogeneous disease and is responsible for considerable mortality and morbidity. The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects nearly 170 million people world-wide. More than 80% of infected individuals develop chronic infection; the remaining 10-20% develop spontaneous clearance with natural immunity. Acute hepatitis is icteric in only 20% of patients and is rarely severe. The majority of patients who develop chronic HCV infection are asymptomatic; but 60-80% develop chronic hepatitis as indicated by elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), around 30% maintain persistently normal ALT levels despite having detectable HCV-RNA in serum. One-third of chronically infected patients develop progressive liver injury, fibrosis and cirrhosis over a period of 20-30 years. The relationship between virus load, HCV genotype, quasi-species variability and progression of liver disease is controversial. Acquired infection after age 40, male sex, excessive alcohol-consumption, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or HIV co-infection, steatosis, and immunosuppressed state have been identified as co-factors associated with progression of fibrosis and development of cirrhosis. In patients with cirrhosis, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is 2-5% per year. At present, HCV-related end-stage cirrhosis is the first cause of liver transplantation.     

A comparison of fibrosis progression in chronic liver diseases

BACKGROUND/AIMS: No study has compared the liver fibrosis progression rates among chronic liver diseases and the risk factors in order to better organize screening strategies. METHODS: A total of 4852 patients were retrospectively studied (chronic hepatitis C (HCV) [n=2313], human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV co-infection (HIV-HCV [n=180]), hepatitis B (HBV [n=777]), alcoholic liver disease (ALD [n=701]), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC [n=406]), genetic hemochromatosis (GH [n=383]) auto-immune hepatitis (AIH [n=57]) and delta hepatitis (n=35). The fibrosis progression rates were estimated from birth and from the date of exposure, when known, to the first biopsy. RESULTS: There were highly significant differences in the rates of fibrosis progression, the most rapid being HIV-HCV co-infection (50% cirrhosis percentile at 52 years of age) and the slowest being PBC (50% cirrhosis percentile at 81 years). There was an acceleration of fibrosis progression with aging. Fibrosis progression was slower in females compared with males for HCV, HBV, GH, and PBC. In contrast, in ALD, the fibrosis progression was more rapid in females. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of fibrosis progression differ markedly between the predominant causes of chronic liver disease, and according to age and gender. Patients with HIV-HCV co-infection are at particularly high risk of fibrosis progression.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection is not associated with disease progression of chronic hepatitis C virus infection

AIM To clarify the prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection(OBI) and the association between OBI and liver disease progression, defined as development of liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), worsening of Child-Pugh class, or mortality in cases of chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection. METHODS This prospective cohort study enrolled 174 patients with chronic HCV infection(chronic hepatitis, n = 83; cirrhosis, n = 47; HCC, n = 44), and evaluated disease progression during a mean follow-up of 38.7 mo. OBI was defined as HBV DNA positivity in 2 or moredifferent viral genomic regions by nested polymerase chain reaction using 4 sets of primers in the S, C, P and X open reading frame of the HBV genome. RESULTS The overall OBI prevalence in chronic HCV patients at enrollment was 18.4%, with 16.9%, 25.5% and 13.6% in the chronic hepatitis C, liver cirrhosis and HCC groups, respectively(P = 0.845). During follow-up, 52 patients showed disease progression, which was independently associated with aspartate aminotransferase 40 IU/L, Child-Pugh score and sustained virologic response(SVR), but not with OBI positivity. In 136 patients who were not in the SVR state during the study period, OBI positivity was associated with neither disease progression, nor HCC development. CONCLUSION The prevalence of OBI in chronic HCV patients was 18.4%, and OBI was not associated with disease progression in South Koreans.     

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus infection on the course of hepatitis C virus infection： A meta-analysis

AIM： TO analyze the influence of human immunodeficiency virus （HIV） infection on the course of hepatitis C virus （HCV） infection. METHODS： We performed a meta-analysis to quantify the effect of HIV co-infection on progressive liver disease in patients with HCV infection. Published studies in the English or Chinese-language medical literature involving cohorts of HIV-negative and -positive patients coinfected with HCV were obtained by searching the PUBMED, EMBASE and CBM. Data were extracted independently from relevant studies by 2 investigators and used in a fixed-effect meta analysis to determine the difference in the course of HCV infection in the 2 groups. RESULTS： Twenty-nine trails involving 16750 patients were identified including the outcome of histological fibrosis or cirrhosis or de-compensated liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma or death. These studies yielded a combined adjusted odds ratio （OR） of 3.40 [95% confidence interval （CI） = 2.45 and 4.73]. Of note, studies that examined histological fibrosis/ cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma or death had a pooled OR of 1.47 （95% CI = 1.27 and 1.70）, 5.45 （95% CI = 2.54 and 11.71）, 0.76 （95% CI = 0.50 and 1.14）, and 3.60 （95% CI = 3.12 and 4.15）, respectively. CONCLUSION： Without highly active antiretroviral therapies （HAART）, HIV accelerates HCV disease progression, including death, histological fibrosis/ cirrhosis and decompensated liver disease. However, the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma is similar in persons who had HCV infection and were positive for HIV or negative for HIV.