A simultaneous study of doppler-echo and catheterization in noninvasive assessment of the left ventricular dp/dt

To confirm the feasibility and accuracy of the method for the noninvasive measurement of the left ventricular dp/dt, 53 patients with mitral regurgitation underwent simultaneous determination of left ventricular dp/dt by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Doppler-determined left ventricular dp/dt is derived from the Doppler mitral regurgitant spectrum by dividing the magnitude of the left ventricular-atrial pressure gradient rise between 1 and 3 m/s of the mitral regurgitant velocity signal by the time taken for this change. Left ventricular dp/dt by Doppler ranged from 629 to 3494 mmHg/s (x? ± SD, 1971 ± 785 mmHg/s), and that by catheterization varied between 716 and 3650 mmHg/s (x? ± SD, 1974 ± 727 mmHg/s). There was a high correlation (r = 0.93, y = 0.862 × + 274.77, SEE = 271 mmHg/s, p < 0.001) of left ventricular dp/dt between the two techniques. It is concluded that left ventricular dp/dt is one of the most commonly used parameters for the evaluation of left ventricular systolic function and that Doppler echocardiography provides a new, accurate and noninvasive method of evaluation.     

Noninvasive evaluation of contractile state by left ventricular dP/dtmax divided by end-diastolic volume using continuous-wave doppler and M-mode echocardiography

The maximum rate of left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (dP/dt_max) is commonly used in the assessment of directional change in LV contractility and, recently, estimated by analyzing continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound velocity curve of mitral regurgitation. As an alteration in ventricular preload is known to affect dP/dt_max, normalized dP/dt_max for preload might be more reliable to assess LV contractile state. To investigate the usefulness of a new index of LV contractile state determined by continuous-wave Doppler analysis of mitral regurgitation and M-mode echocardiogram-derived LV end-diastolic volume, we studied 18 patients with mild mitral regurgitation. The continuous-wave Doppler velocity curves of mitral regurgitation were digitized and converted to instantaneous pressure gradient between the LV and left atrium using the simplified Bernoulli equation. The maximum value of its first derivative (Doppler-derived dP/dt_max) correlated well with LV dP/dt_maxusing simultaneously recorded LV pressures by manometer-tipped catheter (n = 20, r = 0.97, p < 0.001). Corrected Doppler-derived dP/dt_max for LV end-diastolic volume using Teichholz's method significantly increased by inotropic stimulation with dobutamine (p < 0.01); however, it remained unchanged by augmentation of afterload with angioteasin II. Thus, the LV dP/dt_max can be accurately estimated in humans by analyzing the continuous wave Doppler velocity curve of mitral regurgitation, and corrected Doppler-derived dP/dt_max for LV end-diastolic volume is relatively independent of loading alteration and sensitive to inotropic stimulation. We concluded that echocardiographic assessment by combined Doppler- and M-mode measurements provides a useful and sensitive index of LV contractile state noninvasively.     

Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with mitral valve stenosis

Mitral stenosis (MS) is prevalent in developing countries. By improving healthcare systems, it could be expected that the incidence of new cases would decrease and therefore the mean age of mitral stenosis patients would increase. This increase in age of MS patients is accompanied by the occurrence of other diseases, such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.In a number of patients with MS, the question arises of the impact of mitral valve disease (MVD) on the presenting symptom. For example, in patients presenting with dyspnea, with both significant MS and hypertension, increased left ventricular (LV) filling pressure due to hypertension could influence assessment of the severity of MS. In these patients, severity of MS could be underestimated because the increased diastolic pressure reduces the mitral valve gradient, and the increased LV stiffness shortens pressure half-time (PHT).Similarly, patients with both pulmonary disease and MS may have dyspnoea because of pulmonary rather than cardiac cause. It is therefore advantageous to assess LV filling pressure in these cases in an attempt to prove or refute a cardiac cause for dyspnoea.Using Doppler measurements to estimate LV filling pressures is desirable. However, conventional Doppler measurements have limitations in the prediction of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in this group of patients. For example, in patients with MS, the left atrium (LA) is enlarged to compensate for the increase in LA pressure. Similarly, mitral inflow peak early diastolic velocity (E) is highly dependent on LA pressure1 and also preload.2 Pulmonary venous (PV) flow also has a blunted pattern in most patients with MS.3 Therefore, in MS patients, LA size, mitral inflow pattern and pulmonary venous pattern are all altered, making these measurements unreliable for the estimation of LVEDPHowever, other Doppler and tissue Doppler echocardiographic indices and time intervals, such as peak early diastolic velocity of mitral annulus (Ea), E/Ea ratio, mitral inflow propagation velocity (VP), E/VP, pulmonary vein velocities, Tei index and the ratio of isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) to interval between the onset of mitral E and annular Ea (TE–Ea), which have shown promising values in the prediction of LV filling pressure in a variety of diseases,4-11 have not been assessed in the setting of mitral stenosis.The aim of this study was to analyse the components of mitral and pulmonary waves in patients with mitral stenosis and to construct a Doppler-derived LVEDP prediction model based on the combined analysis of transmitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity curves.     

超声心动图观察二尖瓣及肺静脉血流参数与左心室舒张末压的关系

测定６０例心导管受检者左心室舒张期压力，经胸脉冲波多普勒超声心动图记录二尖瓣及肺静脉血流参数并与左心室充盈压作相关分析。发现肺静脉血流参数与左心室舒张压比二尖瓣血流更具相关性。肺静脉返流峰和二尖瓣Ａ峰时限差（ＰＡｄ－Ａｄ）与左室舒张末期压（ＥＤＰ）最具相关性（ｒ＝０．７０，Ｐ＜０．０１），肺静脉返流峰时限长于二尖瓣Ａ峰估测ＥＤＰ≥２ｋＰａ（１５ｍｍＨｇ）的敏感性为８６％、特异性为８１％。左室心房收缩前压力与肺静脉收缩分数呈明显负相关（ｒ＝－０．５９，Ｐ＜０．０１）。表明超声心动图能有效地估测左心室舒张期压力，ＰＡｄ－Ａｄ是估测左心室舒张末期压的最佳指标。肺静脉收缩分数减小提示左室心房收缩前压力明显升高。     

Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure: a simultaneous Doppler echocardiography and catheterization study

Pulmonary hypertension is an important determinant of the clinical presentation of and surgical approach to patients with heart disease. To confirm the utility of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in assessing the pulmonary artery diastolic pressure in patients with pulmonary regurgitation, 51 patients representing the wide hemodynamic spectrum of pulmonary artery pressure underwent simultaneous determination of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure was estimated from the Doppler recordings by the end-diastolic pressure gradient obtained by the modified Bernoulli equation plus the estimated right atrial pressure. A correlation was observed (r = 0.935, SEE = 7.4 mmHg) between Doppler and catheterization pulmonary artery diastolic pressure. In addition, comparison between the mean diastolic pressure gradient across the pulmonary valve by Doppler and pulmonary artery diastolic pressure at catheterization yielded a high correlation (r = 0.947, SEE = 5.1 mmHg). These data demonstrate that continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is a useful noninvasive technique for evaluating the pulmonary artery diastolic pressure in patients with pulmonary regurgitation.     

Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with tissue Doppler imaging in patients with mitral regurgitation

Background: The ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (E/Ea) is a widely used noninvasive tool to estimate left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The aim of this study was to explore whether E/Ea ratio was a reliable index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Sixteen patients with nonischemic MR (primary MR group; 6 male, 58 ± 12 years) 51 patients with ischemic MR (secondary MR group; 29 male, 63 ± 9 years) and 29 patients without MR (control group; 19 male, 53 ± 10 years) were consecutively included. The peak transmitral flow and mitral annular velocities during early diastole were measured. LVEDP was determined invasively by left heart catheterization. Results: Primary and secondary MR groups had significantly higher E/Ea ratios and LVEDP than control group. LVEDP significantly correlated with E/Ea ratio in patients with primary MR, but not in patients with secondary MR. Multiple regression analysis revealed that E/Ea ratio was an independent predictor of LVEDP in patients with primary MR. Ten patients with primary MR had LVEDP ≥15 mmHg. ROC analysis demonstrated cutoff values for E/Ea ratios as >10.5 for lateral mitral annulus (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 66%, PPV: 80%, NPV: 66%) and as >14 for medial mitral annulus (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 83%, PPV: 90%, NPV: 83%) to predict primary MR patients with LVEDP ≥15 mmHg. Conclusion: E/Ea ratio is still reliable in estimation of LVEDP in primary MR patients while it is not predictive for LVEDP in secondary MR patients. (Echocardiography 2011;28:633‐640)     

冠心病患者舒张早期左室舒张末压与二尖瓣血流速度/二尖瓣环运动速度比值的相关性

目的探讨冠心病患者舒张早期二尖瓣血流速度/二尖瓣环运动速度（E/E’）比值与左室舒张末压（LV-EDP）的相关性。方法30例冠心病患者在接受心导管检查之前24 h内进行经胸多普勒超声心动图检查;常规测取二尖瓣血流参数、二尖瓣环运动参数。LVEDP由6F猪尾导管测取。结果线性回归分析表明,舒张早期E/E’比值与LVEDP有较好的相关性（间隔部r=0.739,P〈0.01;左侧壁r=0.710,P〈0.01）。间隔部E/E’≥10估计LVEDP≥15 mmHg的敏感性为85%、特异性为89%;左侧壁E/E’≥10估计LVEDP≥15 mmHg的敏感性为82%、特异性为90%。结论舒张早期E/E’比值与LVEDP有良好的相关性,是半定量估计LVEDP的有效指标。     

The effect of aortic valve replacement on left ventricular mass assessed by echocardiography.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) has different effects on the left ventricular mass (LVM) in patients with different types of aortic valve disease, i.e. aortic stenosis (AS), aortic regurgitation (AR), or combined disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 100 patients with AS; (n=57), AR; (n=22), and combined disease; (n=21). Each patient was evaluated before and up to 8.7 years (mean follow-up period 1.42 +/- 1.65 years) after operation by transthoracic echocardiography. LVM was calculated based on echocardiographic parameters. Following AVR, the LVM for the entire group decreased from 373 +/- 145 g to 280 +/- 102 g (P=0.0001). The AS subgroup lost 13.7 +/- 30.7% from the preoperative LVM, compared to 28.8 +/- 24.8% in the AR subgroup (P<0.05) and 23.1 +/- 33.1% in the combined subgroup. The preoperative LVM was higher among patients with AR vs. AS patients (501 +/- 173 g vs. 319 +/- 100 g respectively, P<0.05). The decrease in LVM was significantly higher in patients with preoperative AR compared to AS patients (165 +/- 150 g vs. 58 +/- 96 g, respectively, P<0.05). However, the postoperative LVM remained higher among the former. The only preoperative parameter (of the LVM formula) that was different between AR and AS patients was the left ventricular end diastolic diameter (68 +/- 11 mm vs. 51 +/- 7 mm, respectively, P<0.05). No significant differences were found in wall thickness among the groups studied. Univariate analysis showed that gender (male), type of aortic valve disease (AR vs. AS), and larger prosthetic valve diameter correlated significantly with greater decrease in postoperative LVM. In multivariate analysis comparing the above variables between AS and AR subgroups, only the patient's gender (i.e. male) was identified as an independent predictor of LVM regression. CONCLUSION: Patients with AR have a greater decline in LVM compared with patients with AS following AVR. The postoperative decline in LVM is higher among males and those with larger prosthetic valve diameter.     

Correlation between calcific aortic stenosis diagnosed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization

This retrospective study correlates the severity of calcific aortic stenosis determined by two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography with the aortic valve area determined by catheterization in 57 patients. Aortic valve leaflet calcification was diagnosed by cineangiography in 50 (88%) of 57 patients and by 2-D echo in 57 (100%) of 57 patients (p less than 0.025). An agreement between severity of aortic stenosis by catheterization and 2-D echo occurred in 22 (39%) of 57 patients. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses showed no correlation between the severity of aortic stenosis and the 2-D echo variables: left ventricular wall thickness, left ventricular diastolic dimension, left ventricular systolic dimension, aortic root diameter, and left atrial dimension. We conclude that 2-D echo detects aortic leaflet calcification better than cineangiography. However, the severity of aortic stenosis determined by 2-D echo correlates poorly with the severity of aortic stenosis determined by cardiac catheterization.     

Correlation between cardiac catheterization and echocardiography in assessing the severity of mitral stenosis

During a 12-mth period 162 consecutive patients with mitral stenosis underwent examination by M-mode as well as cross-sectional echocardiography. The mitral valve area was measured by cross-sectional echocardiography and the severity of mitral stenosis by M-mode echocardiography. Out of the total, 69 patients underwent left and right heart catheterization and in 53 of these the mitral valve area was calculated. A correlation of r = 0.92 for the mitral valve area was found between sector scan echocardiography and cardiac catheterization, whereas the correlation between M-mode echocardiography and catheterization yielded a result of only r = 0.38.Thus the assessment of the severity of mitral stenosis by cross-sectional echocardiography is a reliable alternative to cardiac catheterization.     

Evaluation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

The diagnosis and assessment of mitral regurgitation has been one of the main challenges for cardiac ultrasound. Imaging techniques (M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography) provide direct morphologic and etiologic information of the evaluation of patients with suspected mitral regurgitation. The advent of cardiac Doppler increased tremendously the ability to evaluate mitral regurgitation noninvasively. Continuous-wave and pulsed Doppler have been found to be sensitive and specific in the detection of mitral regurgitation. The introduction of color flow Doppler simplified enormously the assessment of patients with suspected mitral regurgitation. The maximal regurgitant area and maximal regurgitant area corrected for left atrial size have become the most commonly used parameters to evaluate mitral regurgitation by color flow Doppler in the clinical setting. However, the color regurgitant jet area is highly dependent on anatomical, hemodynamic, and equipment factors. A new method, based on the proximal isovelocity surface area, is being evaluated and appears to be relatively independent of equipment factors. Transesophageal echocardiography has been shown to be exquisitely sensitive in the detection of mitral regurgitation. Quantitation of mitral regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography is currently based on the maximal regurgitant area and this parameter appears to correlate closely with the angiographic degree of mitral regurgitation. Pulmonary venous flow analysis had been used in conjunction with color flow mapping for the evaluation of mitral regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography. The presence of reversed systolic flow has been shown to be sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of severe mitral regurgitation. Patients with clinically difficult surface studies, flail mitral valve leaflets, and prosthetic mitral valve are best evaluated by the transesophageal approach with interrogation of pulmonary venous flow.     

彩色多普勒血流会聚法测定主动脉瓣反流量的可行性探讨

目的探讨彩色多普勒血流会聚(FC)法测定主动脉瓣反流量的可行性。方法近端血流会聚角呈水平型的单纯性主动脉瓣反流患者27例,分别用FC法和心导管技术测定主动脉瓣反流量。结果FC法和心导管测定的主动脉瓣每搏反流量分别为(60±27)cm3和(58±25)cm3(P>0.05),两者存在良好相关性(r=0.91,P<0.01)。结论对于近端血流会聚角为水平型的主动脉瓣反流患者,FC法能准确测定其主动脉瓣反流量。     

Pathophysiology of the aortic regurgitation Doppler signal end-diastolic notching: “A-dip insight”

A 76-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with symptoms of severe decompensated heart failure. Initial echocardiogram showed normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, grade II diastolic dysfunction, and mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation. The aortic regurgitant Doppler signal exhibited an end-diastolic notching, called an A-dip. After intravenous diuretic therapy and 3 kg weight loss, a new echocardiogram was performed showing a grade I diastolic dysfunction and complete abolishment of the A-dip. Aortic A-dip is a rare finding denoting increased LV filling pressures. Conditions that favor its occurrence are increased LV stiffness, low diastolic blood pressure, and preserved left atrial contractility.     

Quantification of mitral regurgitation: a comparison of transesophageal echocardiography and contrast ventriculography

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) allows an unobscured view of the left atrium for the assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR). However, criteria for assessing MR by TEE have not been carefully validated. In order to determine and validate criteria for the assessment of MR severity, 65 clinically stable patients with a TEE color Doppler study and contrast ventriculography within a 2-week period were identified. Maximal or peak mitral regurgitation jet area to left atrial area ratio (MR/LA) derived solely from TEE imaging had the best correlation to MR severity by contrast ventriculography (r = 0.89). Utilizing MR jet area without correction for LA size resulted in r = 0.72 to 0.75. Utilizing LA area data from transthoracic echocardiograms in a subset of 29 patients resulted in r = 0.77. Best sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of MR by TEE were obtained using the following criteria: Peak MR/LA of 0%-9% predicts 0 + MR; 10%-28% 1 + MR; 29%-54% 2 + to 3 + MR; and greater than 55% 4 + MR. Best sensitivity and specificity occurs for assessment of 0 + and 4 + MR. Considerable overlap in data occurs in the 1 + and 3 + MR range utilizing the above stated criteria. Peak MR/LA ratio derived from a single TEE view in which the MR jet is maximally imaged is the best determinant of MR severity.     

Sensitivity and specificity of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in detection of aortic and mitral regurgitation

In order to assess the value of pulsed Doppler echocardiographyin detection of valvular regurgitation, 63 patients were evaluatedfor aortic and/or mitral regurgitation using pulsed Dopplerechocardiography and selective cineangiography. The Dopplerstudy was considered as positive when a turbulent flow was detectedbelow the aortic valve for aortic insufficiency and behind themitral valve for mitral insufficiency on a graphic display (timeinterval histogram) when technically adequate andor on an audiosignal.These results were compared with standard angiographic evaluationof the regurgitation: pulsed Doppler echocardiography had 94%sensitivity and the specificity rate was very high (87.5%) evenfor mild regurgitation. Thus, Doppler technique is highly specificand sensitive in detection of aortic and mitral regurgitationwhen both audiosignal and time interval histogram are simultaneouslyperformed.     

Estimation of the peak-to-peak pressure gradient in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography

The present study was designed to develop a new Doppler method to estimate noninvasively the peak-to-peak pressure gradient in patients with aortic stenosis. It was carried out in two steps. In the first study, left heart catheterization data were analysed in 58 patients with aortic stenosis. The peak pressure gradient correlated highly with (r = 0.98) but overestimated significantly the peak-to-peak pressure gradient. The averaged pressure gradient (average of the peak gradient and the gradient at the peak aortic pressure) was found to approximate closely the peak-to-peak pressure gradient (r = 0.99) with a good separation between significant and insignificant aortic stenosis. The ratio of the left ventricular ejection time over the aortic pressure descending time was studied and the beginning of the late one-third systole was chosen as the point for determining the late systolic gradient by the Doppler technique. In the second study, Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization were performed in 35 patients with aortic stenosis. The Doppler-determined peak pressure gradient correlated highly with catheterization-measured peak pressure gradient (r = 0.95) but overestimated significantly the peak-to-peak pressure gradient. The Doppler-determined averaged pressure gradient (average of the peak and the late systolic gradients) estimated accurately the peak-to-peak gradient (r = 0.97) with a good separation between significant and insignificant aortic stenosis. These results demonstrate the limitations of the peak pressure gradient measurement and the reliability of the Doppler-determined averaged pressure gradient for estimation of the peak-to-peak pressure gradient.     

Retrograde atrial kick in acute aortic regurgitation. study of mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocities by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography

Background and hypothesis: The purpose of this study was the comprehensive evaluation of the changes in pulmonary venous and mitral flow velocities of patients with acute and chronic severe aortic regurgitation. Transmitral flow velocities obtained with pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography have been used to provide information on left ventricular (LV) filling and diastolic function. Pulmonary venous flow tracings are an important adjunct to LV inflow pattern in assessing LV diastolic function. Methods: Fourteen patients with severe aortic regurgitation (8 chronic and 6 acute) and in sinus rhythm were examined by transthoracic and transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Mitral and pulmonary flow velocities were recorded and compared. All patients had ejection fractions > 40%. Results: Early mitral flow peak velocity was higher in patients with acute regurgitation (p<0.001). The mitral A wave was absent in five patients with acute regurgitation. In contrast, a prominent reverse atrial pulmonary systolic wave AR was demonstrated in these patients. Peak diastolic velocity of the pulmonary venous flow was greater in patients with acute aortic regurgitation (0.76 ± 0.13) than in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (0.40 ± 0.09) (p<0.001). Peak systolic velocity did not differ significantly between the two groups. The systolic fraction of pulmonary venous flow in patients with acute aortic regurgitation was lower (0.43 ± 0.05) than that of patients with chronic regurgitation (0.63 ± 0.1) (p<0.01). All patients with acute aortic regurgitation had an S/D ratio < 1, while those with chronic regurgitation had an S/D >1 (p< 0.001) and an E/A<1. Conclusion: Patients with severe acute aortic regurgitation showed a retrograde atrial kick (absence of transmitral A wave with prominent pulmonary AR wave). These patients had an S/D ratio < 1 (restrictive Doppler pattern). Patients with chronic aortic regurgitation exhibited a Doppler pattern of abnormal LV relaxation (E/A <1, S/D > 1).     

Validation of six noninvasive Doppler methods for the assessment of left ventricular filling pressure

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of six noninvasive Doppler methods for assessing invasively derived left ventricular diastolic pressure (LVDP). Background: To date, no studies have evaluated which of the various available Doppler methods are most reliable in determining LVDP in a consecutive patient population with different cardiac diseases. METHODS: LVDP was estimated by the following Doppler methods (M): (1) M1-the peak mitral regurgitant flow velocity (peak MR), (2) M2-the mitral regurgitant velocity at the time of aortic valve opening (MRAVO), (3) M3-the aortic regurgitant end-diastolic flow velocity (ARED), (4) M4-the ratio of the transmitral to mitral annular early diastolic velocity (ETM/EDTI), (5) M5-a transmitral flow velocity regression equation (RegrTM), and (6) M6-the difference of pulmonary venous and transmitral A wave duration (APV - ATM duration). For M1-M3, sphygmomanometric blood pressure was used to calculate LVDP. RESULTS: In 101 patients, the regression coefficient, standard error of estimate, and mean difference with confidence limits between Doppler and catheter-derived measurements were as follows: M1 (n = 46): r = 0.81 (P < 0.0001), 4.3 mmHg and 3.7 +/- 12.0 mmHg; M2 (n = 47): r = 0.79 (P < 0.0001), 5.4 mmHg and 1.1 +/- 11.2 mmHg; M3 (n = 20): r = 0.64 (P = 0.002), 7.8 mmHg and 4.6 +/- 17.6 mmHg; M4 (n = 50): r = 0.62 (P < 0.0001), 5.6 mmHg and 0 +/- 11.2 mmHg; M5 (n = 79): r = 0.24 (P = 0.03), 7.1 mmHg and - 0.1 +/- 16.8 mmHg; and M6 (n = 79): r = 0.22 (P = 0.05), 7.3 mmHg and 0 +/- 14.4 mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Doppler measurement of mitral regurgitant jets is most accurate method to estimate left ventricular filling pressure noninvasively.     

Quantification of mitral regurgitation by the proximal flow convergence method--comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND: No dataexist to indicate whether transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are of comparable value for the detection and quantification of mitral regurgitation using the proximal flow convergence method. HYPOTHESIS: The study was performed to compare the value of TTE and TEE for the detection and quantification of mitral regurgitation using this method. METHODS: The study included 57 patients with and 11 patients without mitral regurgitation. In all patients, the proximal flow convergence region was imaged by transthoracic and transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography, and proximal isovelocity surface area radii were determined. In 19 patients, monoplane TEE and in 49 patients multiplane TEE was performed. Thirty-one patients with mitral regurgitation underwent cardiac catheterization. RESULTS: Both methods had a comparable sensitivity for the detection of mitral regurgitation. Proximal isovelocity surface area radii derived from TTE and TEE agreed moderately (mean difference -0.5 +/- 1.3 mm). TTE and TEE correlated significantly with the angiographic grade (rank correlation coefficients 0.83 and 0.81), and both differentiated mild to moderate from severe mitral regurgitation with an accuracy of 90%. Regurgitant volumes derived from both echocardiographic techniques and cardiac catheterization correlated moderately (correlation coefficients between 0.67 and 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: TTE and TEE were of comparable value for the detection and quantification of mitral regurgitation using the proximal flow convergence method.