Comparison of a triple antigen and a single antigen recombinant vaccine for adult hepatitis B vaccination.

Hepatitis B and its sequelae are a major public health problem. Vaccines have been available for almost 20 years; however the disease still remains a global problem. Many factors contribute to the failure to control hepatitis B, including the limited nature of the vaccination programs implemented initially. Only relatively recently has mass childhood vaccination begun to be implemented and vaccination of high-risk groups, other than healthcare workers, is still not general policy. Additional factors contributing to continued persistence of hepatitis B in the developed world are that the present vaccines are not fully used by those recommended to be vaccinated and even when vaccination is carried out appropriately, there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups who have inadequate response to current vaccines, and those who are unwilling or unable to comply with protracted multi-dose vaccine regimens, could be improved if there were a more potent vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Adults who had never been vaccinated against hepatitis B were randomised to receive a vaccination course of either a present single antigen (S) vaccine (Recombivax-HB) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare Medeva Pharma plc). Doses were given at baseline and 1 month and 6 months later. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) levels were measured at 2, 4, 6, and 7 months after beginning vaccination. The primary efficacy parameter was the degree of protection, measured as the percentage of subjects with anti-HBs titres > or = 10 IU/L, 6 or 7 months (26 +/- 2 weeks) after beginning vaccination. A total of 303 adult subjects entered the study and were vaccinated. Of these, 11 failed to complete the study (4 on Hepacare and 7 on Recombivax-HB); however all but 2 (1 to receive the triple antigen vaccine and 1 to receive Recombivax-HB) were included in the intent-to-treat population for efficacy evaluation. Treatment randomisation was stratified at entry based on age (above and below 40 years old) and gender. The standard three-dose/6-month vaccination regimen of the single antigen vaccine protected 83% of subjects by 7 months after starting vaccination whereas the triple antigen vaccine as a two-dose/1-month regimen protected 88% within 6 months and as a three-dose/6-month regimen protected 97% by 7 months after starting vaccination. Thus the protection rate provided by the shortened (0, 1) regimen of the novel vaccine was "essentially equivalent" (i.e., not statistically inferior) to that provided by the full (0, 1, and 6) regimen of today's vaccine (88% vs. 81%, P < 0.001), and the protection rate provided by a three-dose/6-month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of the new vaccine was significantly superior to that provided by present vaccines (97% vs. 83% P < 0.001). The percentage of subjects protected increases with time after beginning vaccination and at all time points up to and including 6 months was significantly greater with the two-dose regimen of the triple antigen vaccine than with the single antigen vaccine regimen. In adults at risk for a reduced response to hepatitis B vaccination [i.e., older adults (>/=40), the obese, males, and smokers], the triple antigen vaccine produced a significantly greater percentage of protected subjects (P < 0.001) and higher geometric mean titre (P < 0.001). Indeed as a three-dose/6 month regimen, the triple antigen vaccine raised the level of protection in these vulnerable subgroups to that seen when a single antigen vaccine is used in the optimal younger adult group. Both vaccines were well tolerated and had similar safety profiles. The most frequently (> or = 10%) reported adverse events with the use of either vaccine were pain at the site of injection (38% vs. 41% vs. 20% for the two-dose Hepacare regimen, the three-dose Hepacare regimen, and the three-dose Recombivax-HB regimen, respectively), infections at the site of injection (1% vs. 14% vs. 9%), headache (9% vs. 13% vs. 11%), and nausea (7% vs. 11% vs. 3%). It is concluded that in healthy normal adults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine that contained S and pre-S antigens produced an enhanced immunological response. This was exemplified by the novel vaccine's ability to overcome factors such as advancing age (> or = 40 years), obesity, and smoking, each of which is known to reduce the potential for protection with present recombinant S only vaccines. A two-dose/1-month (0 and 1) regimen of this triple antigen vaccine was as effective as the standard three-dose/6 month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of present single antigen vaccines. (c) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Field evaluation of the efficacy and immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine without HBIG in newborn Vietnamese infants

A study involving more than 2,000 infants was conducted in Vietnam to assess the field effectiveness and immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine given at birth, 1 month, 2 months, without concomitant hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). All received a 5 microg dose of H-B-VAX II at birth. Infants born to non-carrier mothers (Group 1; N = 1798) then received 2.5 microg doses at 1 and 2 months of age, while infants of HBeAg-negative (Group 2; N = 125) or HBeAg-positive (Group 3; N = 88) carrier mothers received 5 microg doses. No Group 1 or 2 vaccinees were infected. In Group 3, 12 (14.6%) of 82 infants did become infected (estimated efficacy 84%). 98.0-98.6% of uninfected infants who were tested for anti-HBs developed a seroprotective concentration > or = 10 IU/L. In hyperendemic Vietnam, where routine maternal screening and passive-active prophylaxis of high-risk infants with vaccine plus HBIG is not feasible, administration of vaccine alone to all newborns may control effectively HBV infection.     

新生儿不同时期静脉血HBsAg含量对HBV母婴传播阻断失败的预测研究

目的探讨HBV慢性感染孕妇新生儿出生后不同时期静脉血HBsAg含量变化对ItBV母婴传播阻断失败的预测价值。方法以HBsAg、HBeAg双阳性、血清HBVDNA含量≥10^5拷贝／ml慢性HBV感染孕妇所娩新生儿150例为研究对象,出生后立即注射乙肝免疫球蛋白200Iu,并按0、1和6个月程序接种乙肝疫苗10～20μg。分别于新生儿出生时、生后1个月、生后7个月采取静脉血检测HBV血清学指标,分析新生儿不同时期静脉血HBsAg含量对HBV母婴传播阻断失败的预测。结果共有11例新生儿发生HBV母婴阻断失败。新生儿出生时、生后1个月、生后7个月HBsAg阳性率分别为41．26％、10．49％、7．69％,HBeAg阳性率分别为97．90％、65．75％、13．29％。以出生时I-IBsAg≥O．05和HBsAg≥1IU／ml预测HBV母婴传播阻断失败,阳性预测价值分别为18．64％和70％;生后1个月HBsAg〉~O．05和HBsAg≥1IU／ml的阳性预测价值分别为73．33％和100％。结论出生时静脉血HBsAg含量≥1IU／ml时应高度怀疑HBV母婴传播的失败。生后1个月HBsAg≥1IU／ml对母婴传播阻断失败有高度的预测价值,如何提高出生时和生后1个月静脉血HBsAg阳性新生儿的HBV感染阻断率是以后研究的重点。     

Antibody persistence and immune memory in adults, 15 years after a three-dose schedule of a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine

A combined hepatitis A and B vaccine is available since 1996. Two separate open‐label primary studies evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of this hepatitis A and B vaccine (720 EI.U of HAV and 20 µg of HBsAg) in 306 healthy subjects aged 17–43 years who received three doses of the vaccine following a 0, 1, and 6 months schedule. These subjects were followed up annually for the next 15 years to evaluate long‐term persistence of anti‐HAV and anti‐HBs antibodies. The subjects whose antibody concentrations fell below the cut‐offs between Year 11 and Year 15 (anti‐HAV: <15 mIU/ml; anti‐HBs: <10 mIU/ml) were offered an additional dose of the appropriate monovalent hepatitis A and/or B vaccine. In subjects who received the additional vaccine dose, a blood sample was collected 1 month after vaccination. At the Year 15 time point, all subjects in Study A and Study B were seropositive for anti‐HAV antibodies and 89.3% and 92.9% of subjects in the respective studies had anti‐HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/ml. Four subjects (two in each study) received an additional dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine and mounted anamnestic responses to vaccination. No vaccine‐related serious adverse events were reported. This study confirms the long‐term immunogenicity of the three‐dose regimen of the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine, as eliciting long‐term persistence of antibodies and immune memory against hepatitis A and B for up to at least 15 years after a primary vaccination. J. Med. Virol. 84:11–17, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Hepatitis B vaccination in a school age population: a feasibility study

There remains no consensus on whether to adopt a universal hepatitis B vaccination strategy in the United Kingdom, where the endemicity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is considered to be very low in the general population. To assess the feasibility and acceptance of a school-based adolescent vaccination approach, 11-13 years old pupils in local secondary schools in the London Borough of Camden and Islington were contacted and offered a three-dose hepatitis B vaccination course using a 0, 1, and 12 months schedule. The adult dose of hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix B GlaxoSmithKline) containing 20 mug recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in 1 ml suspension was administered. This dosage is normally intended for adults and children older than 15 years of age, but can be administered in 10-15 years old children when compliance may be low, since a higher proportion of those vaccinated develop protective antibody levels following administration of only two doses of vaccine. Overall, a total of 528 pupils were contacted, with 122 (23%) consenting to be vaccinated. Of these, 117 (96%) received the complete three-dose regimen according to the schedule (four did not receive vaccine: three were non-attendees and one was previously vaccinated; one withdrew following a flu-like adverse event). The results of this study show that it is feasible and practical to administer hepatitis B vaccination to adolescents in a school setting, and that it is possible to achieve high rates of uptake for the complete three-dose course among adolescents. However, in order to attain and sustain high coverage rates among pupils, this would require additional general health promotion, including health education and provision of information, targeting of teachers, pupils, and parents in order to increase participation in a school-based hepatitis B vaccination programme. A further requirement includes the availability of good local health support within schools so as to allow for an efficient vaccine delivery system to maximize vaccination in this setting.     

Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in patients with chronic liver disease

The safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was evaluated in patients with chronic liver disease. Sixty hepatitis A virus antibody (anti-HAV) seronegative patients A virus antibody (anti-HAV) seronegative patients with chronic liver disease (56 chronic hepatitis B and four chronic hepatitis C) and from 17 to 47 years of age received a dose of 1440 ELISA units of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine at month 0, and a booster at month 6. Anti-HAV seroconversion (⩾ 33 mlU/mL) was 57.6% (34/59) on day 15, and reached 93.2% (55/59) 1 month after primary vaccination. At month 6, the seropositivity of anti-HAV decreased before the booster to 69.0% (40/58). All vaccinees had measurable titers of anti-HAV 1 month after booster vaccination, and were still seropositive at month 12. After initial vaccination, the geometric mean titers of anti-HAV among vaccine responders were 158, 264, 74, 1309, and 409 mlU/ml at day 15 and months 1, 6, 7, and 12. Overall, 59.7% (71/119) of the vaccine doses administered were followed by mostly minor reactions. The majority of symptoms reported were local, all of which resolved within 3 days after vaccination. No significant changes in serum liver enzyme levels were detected after vaccination. Thus, an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was safe in patients with chronic liver disease while the immune response was inferior to that observed in healthy subjects reported in a previous study. J. Med. Virol. 52:215–218, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Influence of vaccination schedules and host factors on antibody response following hepatitis B vaccination

In a prospective multicentre trial, the influence of schedule, compliance, age, sex and weight on the antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination was investigated. Comparison of the vaccination schedules 0, 1, 6 months (group 1; n=143) and 0, 1, 2, 12 months (group 2; n=141) was performed in months 3, 7 and 12. In addition, the antibody response was compared one month after the third and one and six months after the last vaccination. Seroprotection rates (anti-HB_S>10 IU/l) and antibody titres, given as geometric means (GMTs), were higher in group 1 at month 12 as well as one month after completion of three immunizations. More vaccinees of group 2, however, showed seroprotection at month 3 with higher GMTs. In addition, GMTs in group 2 were higher both one month and six months after the last vaccine dose. Determination of parallel corrected correlation factors demonstrated that age was the most important single factor, followed by body weight and sex. However, no more than 3 % of the variation in the GMT can be explained by the influence of age. Due to decreased compliance with the four-dose schedule with a drop-out rate of approximately 10 % of the vaccinees, the total percentage of initial vaccinees who in the end developed protective antibody levels was higher in the 0, 1, 6 months schedule. Thus, it can be concluded that subjects likely to comply will benefit from the 0, 1, 2, 12 months schedule as more rapid protection is obtained and the higher antibody levels after the booster vaccination at month 12 provide longer protection. However, vaccinees whose compliance might be questionable over a period of 12 months, should be selected for the vaccination 0, 1, 6 months schedule as compliance is at a higher level over this period and advantage can be taken of the booster effect of the third dose given in month 6.     

Comparative evaluation of the immunogenicity of yeast-derived (recombinant) and plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine in infants.

The immunogenicity of plasma-derived (HB Vax,MSD) and recombinant hepatitis B virus (Engerix B, SK&F) vaccines was evaluated in infants born to hepatitis B virus carrier mothers. The vaccination was carried out at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months of age using 10 micrograms of the vaccine given intramuscularly. A total of 83/88 (94.3%) and 74/79 (93.6%) of the infants receiving the plasma-derived vaccine and yeast-derived vaccine showed antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). None of the maternal factors studied apart from the HBeAg positivity corellated with vaccine failure. The yeast-derived vaccine gives marginally lower antibody titre than the plasma-derived vaccine. The group-specific anti-"a" antibody was less than 10% of the total anti-HBsAg titre. It was observed that the vaccine alone without prior administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin is effective in perinatal infection.     

Active pre-exposure immunisation against hepatitis B virus: immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in healthy Thai adults and children

The immunogenicity of plasma derived hepatitis B vaccine (Hevac B) was studied for active pre-exposure immunisation in 176 healthy volunteer adults and 162 randomised children who had no hepatitis B virus markers. All subjects received three injections of 5 micrograms of hepatitis B vaccine intramuscularly at one month intervals. Seroconversion at 2 months after the third dose of vaccine was 96.30 percent in the children and 92.00 percent in the adults with mean anti-HBs titres of 800 mlU/ml and 353 mlU/ml respectively. The difference of anti-HBs levels between these two groups was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Female adults had exhibited higher immune response to HB vaccine than male adults but there was no seroconversion difference between boys and girls. There were no serious local or systemic side effects of hepatitis B vaccination. It was concluded that active immunisation with plasma derived hepatitis B vaccine in non-immune children and adults is highly effective without any serious side effects or complications. The prevention of horizontal transmission of hepatitis B virus should be done by vaccination in children since they have a much better immune response to hepatitis B vaccine than adults.     

Long‐term immunogenicity of preservative‐free hepatitis B vaccine formulations in adults

Vaccination with recombinant hepatitis B vaccines is highly effective in preventing hepatitis B infection. Recently, a preservative‐free (PF) formulation of hepatitis B vaccine [GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium] has been licensed. The immunogenicity of the PF hepatitis B vaccine and antibody persistence 6 years later was assessed in this study. This formulation was compared with the preservative‐ containing (PC) formulation of the vaccine and a low‐preservative (LP) content formulation. Five hundred forty‐one healthy adult subjects were evaluated in the primary study. Over 94% of the subjects in the three study groups had seroprotective anti‐HBs antibody concentrations (≥10 mIU/ml) 1 month after completing primary vaccination. Antibody measurements in 242 healthy adults who returned for the follow‐up study and who had received primary vaccination 6 years earlier showed that over 81% of subjects in the three study groups still had anti‐HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/ml. No apparent differences in antibody decline or distribution between the study groups were observed. These results indicate that the removal of preservatives from the hepatitis B vaccine does not affect adversely its immunogenicity both in the short and in the longer term. J. Med. Virol. 81:1710–1715, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Clinical safety and efficacy of first indigenous recombinant hepatitis B vaccine

A pilot study was conducted to assess the clinical safety and immunogenicity of an indigenously developed recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Shanvac B) in 18 healthy adults. 20 microg of vaccine was administered at 0, 1 and 2 months. Protective anti HBs titres developed in 22%, 77% and 100% one month after 1st, 2nd and 3rd dose of vaccination, respectively. The geometric mean titre after the 3rd dose was 1015.29 mIu/ml. The vaccine was well tolerated with minor local and systemic side effects in 28% and 22%, respectively. The indigenously developed recombinant hepatitis B vaccine is safe, well tolerated and highly immunogenic.     

Immunogenicity of a low dose recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults in Singapore

The immunogenicity and safety of a standard dose of 10 micrograms of a yeast derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (B-Hepavac II) was compared with that of a reduced dose of 5 micrograms in 84 healthy adult volunteers with no previous exposure to hepatitis B. Each subject received either a 10 micrograms or 5 micrograms dose of vaccine intramuscularly at 0, 1 and 6 months. One month after the second injection of vaccine the seroconversion rate in the two groups were 85 and 86 percent respectively. Two months after the third injection 100 percent of participants had sero-converted; 95 percent of the 10 micrograms group and 91 percent of the 5 micrograms group had titres of anti-HBs greater than 10 IU/L. The geometric mean titres (GMT) of anti-HBs levels at 2, 6, 8, and 12 months were 34, 61, 811 and 188 IU/L in the 10 micrograms group and 26, 45, 836 and 304 IU/L in the 5 micrograms group respectively. Adverse effects were mild and transient. The vaccine was safe and immunogenic in the doses given. The reduced dose of 5 micrograms was as effective as the standard 10 micrograms dose.     

Low dose intradermal versus high dose intramuscular hepatitis B vaccination in patients on chronic hemodialysis

Patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk for hepatitis B infection. We randomly assigned 86 new patients on HD to receive either 40 microg intramuscular (group 1) or 20 microg intradermal (group 2) recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, in three doses at 0, 1, and 4 months. All patients were seronegative at baseline for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs-Ag), hepatitis B surface antibody (HBs-Ab), and hepatitis B core antibody (HBc-Ab). HBs-Ab seroconversion rate and antibody titer (ELISA assay) were compared in 27 patients of group 1 and 35 patients of group 2 at 1 month, and in 20 patients of group 1 and 26 patients of group 2 at 6 months after the last vaccine dose. The seroconversion rates (HBs-Ab titer >10 IU/L) were 55.6% and 50% in group 1, and 54.3% and 50% in group 2, at 1 and 6 months, respectively (p = NS). Patients' age, body mass index, serum albumin concentration, and sex distribution were similar in the responders and nonresponders. Intradermal hepatitis B vaccination used at half dose may be a cost saving alternative to intramuscular vaccination in patients on HD. However, the low overall seroconversion rate mandates seeking alternative ways of vaccination in this patient population.     

Randomized trial of the immunogenicity and safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine given in an accelerated schedule coadministered with the human papillomavirus type 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine

The human papillomavirus type 16/18 (HPV-16/18) AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine is licensed for females aged 10 years and above and is therefore likely to be coadministered with other licensed vaccines, such as hepatitis B. In this randomized, open-label study, we compared the immunogenicity of the hepatitis B vaccine administered alone (HepB group) or with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (HepB+HPV group) in healthy women aged 20 to 25 years (clinical trial NCT00637195). The hepatitis B vaccine was given at 0, 1, 2, and 12 months (an accelerated schedule which may be required by women at high risk), and the HPV-16/18 vaccine was given at 0, 1, and 6 months. One month after the third dose of hepatitis B vaccine, in the according-to-protocol cohort (n = 72 HepB+HPV; n = 76 HepB), hepatitis B seroprotection rates (titer of ≥10 mIU/ml) were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.5 to 99.6) and 96.9% (CI, 89.2 to 99.6) in the HepB+HPV and HepB groups, respectively, in women initially seronegative for anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs) and anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc). Corresponding geometric mean titers of anti-HBs antibodies were 60.2 mIU/ml (CI, 40.0 to 90.5) and 71.3 mIU/ml (CI, 53.9 to 94.3). Anti-HBs antibody titers rose substantially after the fourth dose of hepatitis B vaccine. All women initially seronegative for anti-HPV-16 and anti-HPV-18 antibodies seroconverted after the second HPV-16/18 vaccine dose and remained seropositive up to 1 month after the third dose. Both vaccines were generally well tolerated, with no difference in reactogenicity between groups. In conclusion, coadministration of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine did not affect the immunogenicity or safety of the hepatitis B vaccine administered in an accelerated schedule in young women.     

New hepatitis B vaccine formulated with an improved adjuvant system

A new hepatitis B vaccine (FENDrix, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) containing as active substance 20 microg of recombinant hepatitis B virus surface antigen produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has recently been licensed in Europe. It is prepared with a novel adjuvant system: aluminum phosphate and 3-O-desacyl-4 -monophosphoryl lipid A. It is intended for use in adults from the age of 15 years onwards for active immunization against hepatitis B virus infection for patients with renal insufficiency (including prehemodialysis and hemodialysis patients). It is applied in a four-dose scheme: day 0, month 1, 2 and 6 after day 0. Due to the improved adjuvant system it induces higher antibody concentrations that reach protective levels in a faster fashion. Furthermore, due to higher titers reached after the primary immunization course, protective levels are retained for a longer period of time. Vaccination with FENDrix induces more transient local symptoms, with pain at the injection site being the most frequently reported solicited local symptom. Other symptoms such as fatigue, gastrointestinal disorders and headaches were also frequently observed but resolved without sequelae. The higher risk of hepatitis B transmission in patients with end-stage renal disease and the often immunocompromised status of these patients afford a tailored vaccination strategy that, up to now, has consisted of injecting double doses of ordinary hepatitis B vaccines. With the introduction of FENDrix there now exists an efficient alternative with superior immunogenicity that is, despite comparatively higher reactogenicity, well tolerated.     

Comparison of immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine between low and normal birth weight infants.

A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in low and normal birth weight infants. Hepatitis B vaccine (Hevac B Pasteur) was given to 50 low birth weight infants and 50 controls, matched by sex and date of delivery. The vaccine was given at birth, 1, 2 and 12 months of age. HBsAg and anti-HBs were assessed at birth, 4, 9 and 13 months of age by the micro-ELISA technique. Using the geometric mean titre of anti-HBs and the seroconversion rate as indicators, the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in low birth weight infants was as good as in normal birth weight infants.     

Hepatitis B vaccine in the prevention of perinatally transmitted hepatitis B virus infections: initial report of a study in the West Midlands of England

A study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in interrupting perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus from carrier mothers to their babies. A four-dose schedule was used. Eight of nine babies of e antigen carrier mothers became actively immune when immunisations were started within 48 hr of birth. Effectiveness was reduced if immunisation was delayed. This report includes results from a total of 32 babies, the longest period of follow-up being 2 years. The success of this scheme is comparable to that of more intensive prophylaxis of immunoglobulin either alone or combined with vaccine and should be seriously considered for the babies of all hepatitis B carrier mothers.     

Immunogenicity,Safety, and Antibody Persistence at 3, 5, and 10 Years Postvaccination in Adolescents Randomized to Booster Immunization with a Combined Tetanus,Diphtheria, 5-Component Acellular Pertussis,and Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine Administered with a Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine Concurrently or 1 Month Apart

An understanding of the antibody persistence elicited by a combined tetanus, diphtheria, 5-component acellular pertussis, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Tdap-IPV) after adolescent vaccination is important to optimize booster dosing intervals. Our objectives were to compare the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap-IPV coadministered with hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) and sequential administration and evaluate humoral immunity at 3, 5, and 10 years after Tdap-IPV vaccination in adolescents. This phase II randomized, controlled, and open-label study enrolled 280 11- to 14-year-old adolescents with up to 10 years postvaccination follow-up. Group 1 (n = 145) received Tdap-IPV, followed by a HepB dose 1 month later, and group 2 (n = 135) received both vaccines simultaneously. No consistent increases in solicited reactions or unsolicited adverse events occurred with coadministration. All vaccinees attained seroprotective antibody levels at ≥0.01 IU/ml for diphtheria and tetanus, at a ≥1:8 dilution for poliovirus (serotypes 1, 2, and 3), and ≥10 mIU/ml for hepatitis B at 1 month postvaccination. Clinically relevant immunologic interactions did not occur with coadministration. For pertussis, all participants achieved seropositivity levels (at or above the lower limit of quantitation), and 72.7% to 95.8% had 4-fold increases in pertussis antibodies at 1 month postvaccination. At 10 years postvaccination, the remaining participants (62.8% of the original cohort) maintained seroprotective levels of ≥0.01 IU/ml for diphtheria and tetanus, a ≥1:8 dilution for all 3 poliovirus serotypes, and 74.1% to 98.2% maintained pertussis seropositivity levels depending on the antigen tested. There were no differences between the groups. These results support the coadministration of Tdap-IPV and HepB to adolescents and suggest that vaccination with Tdap-IPV can offer protection for 10 years after an adolescent booster vaccination.     

Spotlight on DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib Vaccine (Infanrix hexa™)†

Infanrix hexa?, administered intramuscularly, is a diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B (HBV), inactivated poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine, indicated for primary and booster vaccination of infants. Infanrix hexa? should be administered as a two- or three-dose primary vaccination course in infants aged ≤6 months, followed by booster vaccination between 11 and 18 months of age, with an interval of at least 6 months between the last dose of primary vaccination and the booster dose. This spotlight reviews the immunogenicity and protective effectiveness, as well as the reactogenicity and safety of Infanrix hexa?. Infanrix hexa? as primary and booster vaccination was safe and highly immunogenic for all its component toxoids/antigens in infants aged <2 years, regardless of vaccination schedules. Its immunogenicity and safety profiles were generally similar to those of currently available vaccines, the diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis-based pentavalent vaccines plus monovalent HBV or Hib vaccines. In large clinical studies, Infanrix hexa? elicited a strong immune response against vaccine toxoids/antigens, as indicated by high seroprotection/seropositivity/vaccine response rates and geometric mean titers. Moreover, antibodies against vaccine toxoids/antigens persisted for up to a mean of ≈6 years after booster vaccination, and the vaccine induced long-term immune memory against hepatitis B surface antigen and Hib antigen. A strong immune response against Infanrix hexaTm toxoids/antigens after primary vaccination was also induced in infants who had received a dose of HBV vaccine at birth and in pre-term infants, although the response in the latter group was somewhat lower than that in full-term infants. In addition, when coadministered with other childhood vaccines, the immunogenicity of Infanrix hexa? or that of the concomitantly administered vaccine was generally not altered. Hexavalent vaccines, including Infanrix hexa?, were protective against invasive Hib disease; Infanrix hexa? is also expected to be protective against pertussis. Most solicited local and general symptoms with Infanrix hexa? were mild to moderate in intensity and the vaccine was associated with few unsolicited adverse events. Available clinical data from more than 10 years’ experience with the vaccine suggest that Infanrix hexa? as primary and booster vaccination is a safe and useful option for providing protection against the common childhood diseases of diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, pertussis, hepatitis B and invasive Hib disease. ? Adapted and reproduced from Drugs 2010; 70 (8): 1021–1058. The full text article^[1] was reviewed by: S.L. Block, Kentucky Pediatric Research, Bardstown, Kentucky, USA; G. Gabutti, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; M.E. Pichichero, Rochester General Hospital, Research Institute, Center for Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Rochester, New York, USA; R. Prymula, Department of Epidemiology, University of Defence, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. The manufacturer of the agent under review was offered an opportunity to comment on the original article during the peer review process. Changes based on any comments received were made on the basis of scientific and editorial merit. The preparation of the original article and this spotlight was not supported by an external funding.     

Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of low dose recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine in normal and high-risk neonates.

A low dose of recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (HB-VAX II, MSD) was tested for efficacy in the prevention of perinatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission in normal and high-risk neonates born from HBsAg carrier mothers. A dose of 2.5 micrograms recombinant vaccine was injected intramuscularly at 0, 1, 2 and 12 months of age to 30 newborns from HBsAg negative mother (group I), 30 from HBeAg negative/HBsAg carrier mother (group II) and 30 from HBeAg positive/HBsAg carrier mother (group III). The incidence of persistent HBsAg carrier infants at 13 months of age was 0, 0, and 30.4 percent in groups I, II and III, respectively. The protective efficacy in high risk infants in group III was 65.7 percent. The seroconversion at month 4, after the third dose of vaccination was 96.3, 95.7 and 100 percent in group I, group II and group III, respectively. After a booster dose of vaccination at 12 months of age, the seroconversion rose to 100 percent at month 13 in all three groups. The geometric mean titer (GMT) of anti-HBs antibody at 13 months of age were 2,092, 1,657 and 1,938 mIU/ml in group I, group II and group III, respectively. It is concluded that the low dose (2.5 micrograms) recombinant hepatitis B vaccine using alone is effective in prevention of perinatal HBV transmission in low risk infants (groups I and II), but it is less effective in high risk infants (group III).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)