Blunted prolactin response to exogenous luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in superovulated women

To investigate the prolactin (PRL) response to luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) in superovulated cycles, eight normally ovulating women were studied in two cycles, i.e. a spontaneous (control) and a cycle treated with 'pure' follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (225 IU/day). LHRH was given to the women i.v. (a single injection of 100 micrograms) in the late follicular phase of both cycles. The oestradiol levels (mean +/- SEM) at the time of the LHRH challenge were 635 +/- 31 and 1707 +/- 225 pmol/l respectively (P less than 0.001). The size of the leading follicle was similar in both cycles. Basal PRL levels (mean +/- SEM) on the day of the LHRH experiment were significantly higher in the FSH (250 +/- 31 microIU/ml) than in the spontaneous cycles (133 +/- 15 microIU/ml. P less than 0.05). In the latter cycles, LHRH induced a significant increase in serum PRL and LH levels, while the FSH cycles, the prolactin (PRL) response to LHRH was blunted and LH response markedly attenuated. We conclude that superovulation induction stimulates basal but suppresses LHRH-induced PRL release. It is suggested that basal PRL secretion is LHRH-independent and the suppressing effect is mediated via previously described paracrine interactions between the gonadotrophs and lactotrophs and/or through ovarian inhibitory substances.     

Elevated FSH concentrations in imminent ovarian failure are associated with higher FSH and LH pulse amplitude and response to GnRH

Imminent ovarian failure (IOF) in women is characterized by regular menstrual cycles and elevated early follicular phase FSH. This study explored underlying neuroendocrine causes of elevated FSH concentrations on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. The characteristics of episodic secretion of FSH and LH, the pituitary response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), plasma oestradiol, and dimeric inhibin A and inhibin B on day 3 were compared in 13 women with elevated FSH concentrations (>10 IU/l) and 16 controls. FSH amplitudes were higher in the IOF group than in the controls (P < 0. 0001). The FSH pulse frequency did not differ between groups. The FSH response to GnRH was higher in the IOF patients than in the controls (P < 0.0001). Mean LH, LH amplitude and LH response to GnRH were higher in the IOF group, but LH pulse frequency did not differ between the groups. Concentrations of inhibin A and inhibin B were lower in the IOF group, while oestradiol showed no differences. We concluded that in women with IOF, the pituitary is more sensitive to GnRH. This leads to higher FSH and LH pulse amplitudes which underlie the elevated FSH concentrations in the early follicular phase.     

The synergistic effects of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin in the folliculogenesis of stimulated cycles as assessed by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Nal-Glu.

Clomiphene citrate (CC), alone or in combination with exogenous gonadotrophins, has been widely used in ovulation induction. CC promotes endogenous release of gonadotrophins, yet when used in combination with exogenous gonadotrophins, its contribution to folliculogenesis is difficult to assess. In order to determine the contribution of CC-induced endogenous gonadotrophin production to the overall ovarian stimulation in cycles treated with CC/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), Nal-Glu, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist was administered. Fertile women (n = 10) undergoing ovarian stimulation and oocyte aspiration for the sole purpose of gamete donation were studied. Five women received CC (100 mg daily for 5 days) in conjunction with pure follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) 150 IU daily. Five women received HMG alone. Nal-Glu (50 micrograms/kg/day) was administered intramuscularly to both groups when the leading follicles reached a mean diameter of 16 mm. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) 10,000 IU was given when the largest follicles reached a mean diameter of 20-22 mm. A significant fall in serum oestradiol levels was observed in women given CC/FSH (37.9 +/- 7.3%) within the first 24 h of Nal-Glu administration. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) decreased greater than 20% within 24 h of Nal-Glu administration and remained low throughout the rest of the treatment. No decrease in oestradiol levels was noted in cycles receiving HMG alone. With supplemental FSH, falling oestradiol levels in CC/FSH cycles rebounded and continued to rise until the day after HCG administration. Despite a drop in oestradiol in CC/FSH cycles, the aspirated oocytes exhibited no untoward effects. The fertilization and cleavage rates were similar, and pregnancies occurred in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of gonadotrophins with differing LH/FSH ratios on the secretion of the various species of inhibin in women receiving IVF

We have measured secretory patterns of inhibin A, B, total alpha inhibin, pro-alphaC inhibin and oestradiol in women following pituitary suppression who were randomised into two groups to receive either urinary gonadotrophin (25:75 IU/ampoule of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Normegon; n = 11) or recombinant (r)FSH (75 IU/ampoule of FSH alone, n = 16). The women were of similar age (approximately 33 years) and length of infertility (approximately 4 years) and had a normal endocrine evaluation. Plasma FSH, LH, oestradiol, inhibin A, B, pro-alphaC and total alpha inhibin were measured by immunoassay prior to and following gonadotrophin stimulation. Immunoactive FSH, LH and oestradiol blood concentrations following pituitary down regulation were similar in the two groups being <2.0, <3.6 IU/l and <82 pmol/l respectively. The units of FSH given (2230 versus 2764 IU; Normegon versus rFSH), duration of treatment (9.1 versus 9.4 days) and number of follicles of > or =14mm on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration (17 versus 14) were also similar. Inhibin A or B concentrations rose similarly during Normegon or rFSH administration, peaking at days 9-11. Total alpha and pro-alphaC inhibin concentrations were lower (P < 0.05) in the rFSH group during days 10 and 11 of treatment being 18.9 +/- 15.9 ng/ml (Normegon) and 4.6 +/- 2.8 ng/ml (rFSH) for total alpha inhibin and 8.5 +/- 6.8 ng/ml (Normegon) and 2.8 +/- 1.6 ng/ml (rFSH) for pro-alphaC inhibin on day 10. Overall, higher total alpha inhibin concentrations were associated with more mature follicles and oocytes, greater fertilization rates and better quality embryos. We conclude that inhibin A and B secretion was similar in both groups and is primarily controlled by FSH, whereas total alpha inhibin and pro-alphaC increased preferentially in the Normegon group over the rFSH group, indicating that they are, in part, stimulated by LH.     

Immunology: A search for immunoglobulins inhibiting gonadal cell steroidogenesis in premature ovarian failure

Premature ovarian failure (POF) may be caused by the actionof circulating gonadotrophin receptor-blocking antibodies. Luteinizinghormone (LH)-stimulated testosterone production from mouse Leydigcells and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)-stimuIated oestradiolproduction from immature rat Sertoli cells were therefore studiedin the presence of protein-G purified immunoglobulin G (IgG)samples from control subjects (n = 9), infertile women withelevated early follicular phase FSH levels but otherwise normalmenstrual cycles (n = 10), and patients with POF (n = 10) orGraves' disease (n = 10). A saturating and subsaturating (78%for LH; 60% for FSH) dose of each hormone was chosen for study.A commercial preparation of human IgG (Sigma IgG, 0.75 mg/ml)employed as negative control had no effect on basal or gonadotrophin-stimulatedsteroidogenesis. In its presence, saturating doses of LH (2TV/I) and FSH (20 IU/1) gave rise to 11.2 ± 0.8 (n =7) and 25.1 ± 5.8 (n = 8) fold increases in steroid secretion.IgG (0.75 mg/ml) had no effect in the four groups on LH-stimulatedtestosterone outputs using a saturating (2 IU/1) or subsaturating(1 IU/I) dose of hormone. For example, LH (2 IU/l)-stimuIatedtestosterone production was 94% (83–96 median; interquartilerange) and 88% (81–99) of the Sigma IgG control for controland POF groups respectively. However, four out of nine IgG samplesfrom the normal subjects (mean ± SEM = 86 ± 6%),two out of 10 of the high FSH group (77 ± 4%), five outof 10 with Graves' disease (86 ± 3%) and six out of 10with POF (76 ± 6%) gave rise to LH (2 IU/l)-stimulatedtestosterone outputs which were lower (P < 0.05) than thatof Sigma IgG control. Using the identical set of patients andan IgG concentration of 0.25 mg/ml, the FSH-stimulated oestradioloutputs of the four groups were similar when using either thesaturating (20 IU/1) or subsaturating (5 IU/1) dose of the hormone.Thus, the percentage of FSH (20 IU/l)-stimulated oestradiolproduction of the Sigma IgG control was 81 (66–89 median,interquartile range) and 50 (38–84) for control and POFgroups respectively. However, once again individual patientshad inhibitory IgGs such that four out of nine (controls), threeout of 10 Premature ovarian failure (POF) may be caused by theaction of circulating gonadotrophin receptor-blocking antibodies.Luteinizing hormone (LH)-stimulated testosterone productionfrom mouse Leydig cells and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)-stimuIatedoestradiol production from immature rat Sertoli cells were thereforestudied in the presence of protein-G purified immunoglobulinG (IgG) samples from control subjects (n = 9), infertile womenwith elevated early follicular phase FSH levels but otherwisenormal menstrual cycles (n = 10), and patients with POF (n =10) or Graves' disease (n = 10). A saturating and subsaturating(78% for LH; 60% for FSH) dose of each hormone was chosen forstudy. A commercial preparation of human IgG (Sigma IgG, 0.75mg/ml) employed as negative control had no effect on basal orgonadotrophin-stimulated steroidogenesis. In its presence, saturatingdoses of LH (2 TV/I) and FSH (20 IU/1) gave rise to 11.2 ±0.8 (n = 7) and 25.1 ± 5.8 (n = 8) fold increases insteroid secretion. IgG (0.75 mg/ml) had no effect in the fourgroups on LH-stimulated testosterone outputs using a saturating(2 IU/1) or subsaturating (1 IU/I) dose of hormone. For example,LH (2 IU/l)-stimuIated testosterone production was 94% (83–96median; interquartile range) and 88% (81–99) of the SigmaIgG control for control and POF groups respectively. However,four out of nine IgG samples from the normal subjects (mean± SEM = 86 ± 6%), two out of 10 of the high FSHgroup (77 ± 4%), five out of 10 with Graves' disease(86 ± 3%) and six out of 10 with POF (76 ± 6%)gave rise to LH (2 IU/l)-stimulated testosterone outputs whichwere lower (P < 0.05) than that of Sigma IgG control. Usingthe identical set of patients and an IgG concentration of 0.25mg/ml, the FSH-stimulated oestradiol outputs of the four groupswere similar when using either the saturating (20 IU/1) or subsaturating(5 IU/1) dose of the hormone. Thus, the percentage of FSH (20IU/l)-stimulated oestradiol production of the Sigma IgG controlwas 81 (66–89 median, interquartile range) and 50 (38–84)for control and POF groups respectively. However, once againindividual patients had inhibitory IgGs such that four out ofnine (controls), three out of 10 (high FSH group), four outof 10 (Graves' disease) and six out of 10 (POF patients) inhibited(P < 0.05) FSH (20 IU/ l)-stimulated oestradiol secretionby 52 ± 9 (mean ± SEM), 44 ± 7, 52 ±6 and 41 ± 6% respectively. Of the patients with inhibitoryIgGs the extent of inhibition of gonadotrophin-stunulated steroidsecretion was similar between the groups. In conclusion, thereis little evidence to suggest that immunoglobulins blockinggonadotrophin receptors are a mechanism for POF in a large proportionof women suffering from this condition.     

Andrology: Failure of oestrogen induced luteinizing hormone surge in women treated with mifepristone (RU 486) every day for 30 days

It has been demonstrated previously that administration of theantiprogestin mifepristone (RU 486; 1–5 mg daily) inhibitsor delays both the pre-ovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surgeand ovulation. To investigate this mechanism, dynamic testsof pituitary ovarian function were performed in six healthywomen before and during the administration of mifepristone (2mg daily for 30 days). On day 9 of the control and treatmentcycles, samples of blood were collected every 15 min over 12h for measurement of LH concentration. After 10 h, the responsivenessof the pituitary was tested by the i.v. injection of 10 µgof gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). On day 10 of thecontrol and treatment cycles, two patches releasing 200 µg/dayof oestradiol were applied to skin on the abdomen for 3 days.Blood was collected at 24, 48, 59, 72, 81 and 96 h after applicationof the oestrogen patches for the measurement of gonadotrophinand ovarian hormone concentrations. Follicular development continuedin all women during their treatment with mifepristone, and ovulationwas suppressed (four women) or delayed (two women). There wasno significant difference in the basal concentration of LH betweenthe control and treatment cycles (mean ± SE; 5.5 ±0.4 versus 7.7 ± 0.4 IU/l respectively), or in the frequency(interpulse interval, 101 ± 12 versus 105 ± 13min respectively) and the amplitude (2.1 ± 0.4 versus2.6 ± 0.4 IU/l respectively) of LH pulses. The responseto GnRH was similar. On day 10, the basal concentrations ofLH, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin, oestradioland progesterone and the diameter of the dominant follicle (15.7± 1.8 versus 13.3 ± 1.9 mm) were similar duringcontrol and treatment cycles. In control cycles, there weresignificant increases in the concentrations of LH and FSH within72 h of application of the oestrogen patches. During treatmentcycles, concentrations of FSH and LH remained low, and weresignificantly lower than the values observed during controlcycles (P < 0.006). We conclude that the antiprogestin mifepristonedisrupts ovulation by inhibiting the positive feedback effectof oestrogens and, hence, prevents or delays the generationof a pre-ovulatory LH surge.     

Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction

The impact of suppressed concentrations of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in 200 consecutive, normogonadotrophic women (couples) was analysed retrospectively. A standard stimulation protocol with mid-luteal gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation and ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was used in all cases. Blood was sampled from each woman on stimulation days 1 and 8 for analysis of oestradiol and LH in serum. A threshold value of serum LH of 0.5 IU/l on stimulation day 8 (S8) was chosen to discriminate between women with low or 'normal' LH concentrations. Low concentrations of LH on S8 (<0.5 IU/l) were found in 49% (98/200) of the women. This group of women was comparable with the normal LH group with regard to pre-treatment clinical parameters, and to the parameters characterizing the stimulation protocol with the exception of serum oestradiol concentration, which on S8 was significantly lower than in the normal LH group (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive pregnancy tests was similar in the two groups (30% versus 34% per started cycle), but the final clinical treatment outcome was significantly different, with a five-fold higher risk of early pregnancy loss (45% versus 9%; P < 0.005) in the low LH group and consequently a significantly poorer chance of delivery than in the normal LH group. It is concluded that a substantial proportion of normogonadotrophic women treated with GnRH agonist down-regulation in combination with FSH, devoid of LH activity, experience LH suppression, which compromises the treatment outcome. Whether these women would benefit from supplementation with recombinant LH or human menopausal gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, remains to be proven in the future by prospective randomized trials.     

Positive feedback effect of oestradiol in superovulated women.

To investigate the mechanism of blockage of the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in superovulated women, six normally ovulating women were studied in three cycles: a spontaneous cycle treated with exogenous oestrogen (oestradiol benzoate cycle), a cycle treated with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; 225 IU/day; FSH cycle) and a cycle treated with FSH plus exogenous oestrogen (FSH + oestradiol benzoate cycle). Oestradiol benzoate was injected i.m. on cycle days 4 (0800 and 2000 h), 5 (0800 h) and 6 (0800 h) at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 2.5 mg respectively to achieve supraphysiological levels of serum oestradiol. Exogenous oestrogen (supraphysiological oestradiol levels) induced an LH surge in all six women in the oestradiol benzoate cycles, but failed to stimulate an LH surge in three of the six patients during treatment with FSH. In three patients treated with FSH, an LH surge was stimulated both by supraphysiological (FSH + oestradiol benzoate cycles) and 'high normal' oestradiol levels (FSH cycles), while in three patients treated with FSH only, the LH surge was blocked, although the threshold level for the positive feedback effect had been exceeded by cycle day 9. We conclude that in women, supraphysiological concentrations of oestradiol exert a positive feedback effect on LH secretion. It is suggested that the occurrence of an LH surge in cycles superovulated with FSH is not dependent on serum oestradiol concentrations, but mainly on the strength of ovarian inhibitory substances.     

Simultaneous evaluation of basal FSH and oestradiol response to GnRH analogue (F-G-test) allows effective drug regimen selection for IVF

To determine whether preliminary assessment of ovarian reserve by simultaneous evaluation of basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol response to gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue (F-G-test) can be used to tailor individually the drug regimen for ovarian stimulation, the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) results of 238 patients were retrospectively analysed. Sixty-two women with abnormal response to the test (DeltaE2 <180 pmol/l and/or FSH >9.5 mIU/ml) had commenced buserelin nasal spray in the mid-luteal phase and discontinued it on cycle day 1. Ovarian stimulation was started on cycle day 3 with 375 IU/day of gonadotrophin. Fifty-three patients completed the treatment cycle (group A). A total of 176 women with normal response to the test (DeltaE2 >180 pmol/l and FSH <9.5 mIU/ml) had continued the GnRH analogue throughout the stimulation cycle and a starting dose of 225 IU/day of gonadotrophin was used from cycle day 3. A total of 158 patients completed the treatment cycle (group B). Group A had significantly higher age (34.9 +/- 4.2 versus 33.2 +/- 4.2) (P < 0.05) and basal FSH (9.2 +/- 3.8 versus 7.0 +/- 2.2) (P < 0.05) and required a higher total dose of gonadotrophin. The numbers of oocytes retrieved and embryos transferred were significantly lower. However, fertilization, clinical pregnancies, and implantation rates were similar in both groups. It was concluded that simultaneous evaluation of basal FSH and oestradiol response to GnRH analogue can be useful in identifying subcategories of women with reduced ovarian reserve who may benefit from reduced GnRH analogue administration and a higher starting dose of gonadotrophin.     

Ovarian stimulation in previous failures from in-vitro fertilization: distinction of two groups of poor responders

Forty-three patients who responded poorly to previous stimulation with clomiphene citrate (CC)/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for IVF were followed during 70 further cycles. Eighteen patients had a normal FSH response to CC in the previous cycle, while 25 had an abnormal FSH response. Three stimulation protocols were used: buserelin/HMG, CC/HMG and HMG only. No difference between the two groups was observed in the dose of HMG used for any stimulation protocol. More cycles were cancelled due to a poor response in the abnormal response group compared to the normal response group. In the completed cycles, the maximum oestradiol level and number of oocytes retrieved were lower in the abnormal response group compared to the normal response group. The total pregnancy rate per patient, including spontaneous conceptions during the study period, was lower in the abnormal response group compared to the normal response group, 4 versus 33%. We conclude that poor responders with an abnormal FSH response to CC have a latent ovarian failure with a low chance of success in further IVF attempts.     

Prediction of over-response to ovarian stimulation in an intrauterine insemination programme.

Prediction of poor-response is of equal importance to prediction of over-response in intrauterine insemination programmes. The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) stimulation test (GAST) was assessed as a predictor of over-response to ovarian stimulation in 81 patients. Blood samples were taken on cycle day 2 (before and 24 h after starting the GnRHa). Day 2 and 3 samples were assayed for oestradiol, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess age, day 2 FSH, day 2 FSH/LH, oestradiol ratio (oestradiol on day 3/oestradiol on day 2) and FSH ratio (FSH on day 3/FSH on day 2) as predictors of the number of follicles (total and > or = 14 mm), oestradiol on HCG day, and clinical pregnancy rate as appropriate. Several parameters were also compared between the patients who produced < or = 3 (> or = 14 mm) follicles (group A) and those who produced >3 (> or = 14 mm) follicles (group B). The mean +/- SEM age of the patients in the study was 32 +/- 0.4 years. The mean total dose of recombinant FSH was 800 +/- 20 IU and the mean duration of stimulation was 7.6 +/- 0.2 days. Nine (11%) and 12 (15%) patients were cancelled for poor and over-response respectively. The oestradiol ratio was significantly positively correlated with oestradiol on HCG day (P < 0.001), and with the number of mature follicles (> or = 14 mm) (P = 0.01). Age, day 2 FSH and FSH ratio were not significantly correlated with oestradiol on HCG day, total follicles and follicles > or = 14 mm. None of the above-mentioned variables was correlated with clinical pregnancy rate. Group A had significantly lower oestradiol ratio (P = 0.007), longer duration of stimulation (P = 0.002), higher total FSH dose (P = 0.001), and lower oestradiol on HCG day (P = 0.001). GAST is therefore useful in predicting the high responders to gonadotrophin stimulation.     

The effects of clomiphene citrate upon ovulation and endocrinology when administered to patients with unexplained infertility

Twenty-four couples with unexplained infertility were studied in a spontaneous cycle followed by a clomiphene citrate (CC) cycle (150 mg, days 5-9). All spontaneous cycles were ovulatory, as defined by follicular collapse determined by transvaginal sonography. In CC cycles, 6/24 (25%) cycles demonstrated luteinized unruptured follicles (LUF). In 2/6 LUF cycles there was no apparent luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. LUF cycles had significantly elevated LH levels in the follicular phase compared to ovulatory CC cycles. There was no apparent difference in serum oestradiol. In CC cycles multifollicular development occurred in 87.5% of cycles, with significantly elevated serum oestradiol. Luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone were elevated in the follicular phase compared to spontaneous cycles. This study suggests a high incidence of LUF when CC is administered to ovulatory patients, and its use in patients with ovulatory infertility is questioned.     

Revival of the natural cycles in in-vitro fertilization with the use of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation

Natural cycles were abandoned in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryo transfer, due to premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges--and subsequent high cancellation rates. In this study, we investigated the administration of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix) in the late follicular phase of natural cycles in patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 44 cycles from 33 healthy women [mean age 34.1 +/- 1.4 (range 26-36) years] were monitored, starting on day 8 by daily ultrasound and measurement of serum concentrations of oestradiol, LH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and progesterone. When plasma oestradiol concentrations reached 100-150 pg/ml, with a lead follicle between 12-14 mm diameter, a single injection (s.c.) of 0.5 mg (19 cycles) or 1 mg (25 cycles) Cetrorelix was administered. Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; 150 IU) was administered daily at the time of the first injection of Cetrorelix, and repeated thereafter until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Four out of 44 cycles were cancelled (9.0%). No decline in follicular growth or oestradiol secretion was observed after Cetrorelix administration. A total of 40 oocyte retrievals leading to 22 transfers (55%) was performed. In 10 cycles (25%), no oocyte was obtained. Fertilization failure despite ICSI occurred in six cycles (15%). In two patients the embryo was arrested at the 2 pronuclear (PN) stage. The stimulation was minimal (4.7 +/- 1.4 HMG ampoules). A total of seven clinical pregnancies was obtained (32.0% per transfer, 17.5% per retrieval), of which five are ongoing. Thus, a spontaneous cycle and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix in single dose administration could represent a first-choice IVF treatment with none of the complications and risks of current controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, and an acceptable success rate.     

Induction of follicular growth and production of a normal hormonal milieu in spite of using a constant low dose of luteinizing hormone in women with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism

This study was designed to examine ovarian performance, i.e.follicular growth, normal steroidogenesis and luteal phase function,following the administration of multiple increasing doses ofhuman follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) with a constant lowdose of luteinizing hormone (LH) in women with isolated hypogonadotrophichypogonadism. Human meno–pausal gonadotrophin (HMG) wasused in the first treatment cycle, starting with 150 IU of LHand 150 IU of FSH per day, for 7 days. The dose was increaseddaily with 75 IU of LH and 75 IU of FSH for another 7 days ifno response was detected by serial ultrasound measurements andserumoestradiol determinations. In the second treatment cycle,a constant dose of 75 IU of LH (using HMG) was administeredper day and up to 150 IU of FSH (using urofollitrophin) wassupplemented. If no response was detected after 7 days of treatment,the dose of FSH was increased. For the final stage of ovulationinduction, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was administeredin the presence of at least one follicle >17 mm in diameterbut with no more than three follicles >16mm in diameter.To verify the adequacy of the luteal phase, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamicstudy of -HCG, oestradiol and progesterone was performed followingthe second treatment cycle only. Ovarian stimulation using aconstant dose of 75 IU of LH and increasing doses of FSH upto 225 IU, resulted in normal follicular growth and hormonalmilieu. Both women showed normal luteal phase oestradiol andprogesterone production and both women conceived following thesecond treatment cycle     

Suppression of LH during ovarian stimulation: effects differ in cycles stimulated with purified urinary FSH and recombinant FSH

There has been much debate about the role of luteinizing hormone (LH) during follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)-treated ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, where the endogenous LH is suppressed using a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue. The requirement for LH in oestradiol biosynthesis is established, but other effects of 'insufficiency' are less clear, and little attention has been paid to the specific origin of the FSH used. The aim of this study was to examine the roles of profoundly suppressed circulating LH concentrations in cycles of ovarian stimulation for IVF, which were affected in two large separate cohorts of patients undergoing assisted reproduction. They were stimulated by either purified urinary FSH (MHP) or recombinant human FSH (rFSH). Within each dataset, outcomes were examined with respect to the circulating concentrations of LH in the mid-follicular phase, as plasma samples were stored prospectively, and assayed retrospectively. Patients with profoundly suppressed LH showed much reduced oestradiol concentrations at mid-follicular phase and at human chorionic gonadotrophin administration in cycles treated with either MHP or rFSH. However, gross ovarian response, as became evident by FSH dose demands, duration of stimulation, and also oocyte and embryo yields and embryo cryopreservation were influenced only in cycles treated with MHP. Furthermore, no effect upon pregnancy survival was observed. Thus, it is concluded that there is a demand for additional exogenous LH treatment only in cycles treated with purified urinary FSH where the LH is profoundly suppressed.     

LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate about the effect of 'residual' LH levels in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH ovarian stimulation. The aim of this prospective study, where receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used, was to assess further the usefulness of serum LH levels as predictors of ovarian response, assisted reproduction treatment outcome, and the outcome of pregnancy when measured throughout the ovarian stimulation period in a large cohort of such assisted reproduction treatment women. METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive women undergoing their first cycle of IVF or ICSI treatment were included in this study. Blood samples for hormone analyses were obtained on day S0 (the day when pituitary suppression was evidenced) and every other day from stimulation day 5 (S5) until the day of hCG injection. RESULTS: LH serum levels throughout ovarian stimulation treatment were similar for cancelled (n =32) versus non-cancelled (n = 214) cycles, non-conception (n = 132) versus conception (n = 82) cycles, and ongoing pregnancy (n = 66) versus early pregnancy loss (n = 16) groups. There was no correlation between LH serum levels in non-cancelled cycles and parameters of ovarian response and assisted reproduction treatment outcome. ROC analysis showed that serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation was unable to discriminate between cancelled and non-cancelled cycles, conception versus non-conception cycles, or early pregnancy loss versus ongoing pregnancy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH measurements during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment cannot predict ovarian response, IVF/ICSI outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy. Thus, there is little underlying physiological support for the addition of LH in stimulation protocols if daily doses of an appropriate GnRH agonist (leuprolide or triptorelin having lower potency than buserelin) and a step-down regimen of recombinant FSH administration are used.     

Depletion of ovarian reserve in young women after treatment for cancer in childhood: detection by anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin B and ovarian ultrasound

BACKGROUND: Treatment of cancer during childhood may result in loss of primordial follicles from the ovary. METHODS: Ten cancer survivors and 11 controls with regular menstrual cycles, in addition to 10 cancer survivors and 10 controls taking the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) were recruited. Subjects were investigated on days 3-5 of a menstrual cycle, or week 3 of COCP administration before and 24 h after administration of 225 IU FSH. RESULTS: Serum FSH levels were elevated in cancer survivors with regular menstrual cycles (7.5 +/- 1.4 versus 4.2 +/- 0.3 IU/l; P = 0.02), while anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were lower (13.0 +/- 3.0 versus 21.0 +/- 3.4 pmol/l; P < 0.05). Other hormone levels were unchanged. Ovarian volume was smaller in cancer survivors than controls (3.0 +/- 0.5 versus 5.0 +/- 0.8 ml; P < 0.05), but antral follicle count (AFC) was similar. During COCP administration, inhibin B remained undetectable in six cancer survivors after FSH administration, whereas all controls showed a rise in inhibin B levels. The AFC was lower in cancer survivors than in controls (4.2 +/- 0.8 versus 7.2 +/- 0.8; P = 0.02). Ovarian volume was low in both groups, but did not differ between them. CONCLUSIONS: The study results demonstrate both hormonal and biophysical evidence of partial loss of the ovarian reserve in young cancer survivors. This was detected both in women with normal menstrual cycles and during COCP administration.     

Main inhibitor of follicle stimulating hormone in the luteal-follicular transition: inhibin A, oestradiol, or inhibin B?

The roles of oestradiol, inhibin A and inhibin B in the luteal-follicular transition were assessed by means of specific assays. Six premenopausal women were studied during a control and then a cycle treated with percutaneous oestradiol 0.1 mg/day from day 10 after the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge until day 4 of the following cycle. Inhibin A concentrations decreased similarly in control and treated cycles from day -5 to day 2, then increased in control cycle to 23.3 +/- 3.4 pg/ml on day 10 (mean +/- SEM). They remained low until day 5 in treated cycles and were lower than controls on day 10 (P < 0.01). Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations increased on day 1 in controls and on day 5 in treated cycles when oestradiol concentration fell abruptly. Inhibin B concentrations remained low until day 1 in controls and day 4 in treated cycles. In both, inhibin B concentrations increased 1 day after FSH, peaking at 160 pg/ml. FSH concentrations began to plateau when inhibin B concentrations were >100 pg/ml and oestradiol concentrations below 200 pmol/l. These data suggest that inhibin A is not responsible for FSH suppression in the luteal phase and that the negative control of FSH shifts from oestradiol in the luteal phase to inhibin B in the mid-follicular phase.     

Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication

A new treatment option for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation is the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with the possibility to trigger a mid-cycle LH surge using a single bolus of GnRH agonist, reducing the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders and the chance of cycle cancellation. This report describes the use of 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl) to trigger ovulation in eight patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH, Puregon) and concomitant treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) for the prevention of premature LH surges. All patients were considered to have an increased risk for developing OHSS (at least 20 follicles > or =11 mm and/or serum oestradiol at least 3000 pg/ml). On the day of triggering the LH surge, the mean number of follicles > or =11 mm was 25.1 +/- 4.5 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 3675 (range 2980-7670) pg/ml. After GnRH agonist injection, endogenous serum LH and FSH surges were observed with median peak values of 219 and 19 IU/l respectively, measured 4 h after injection. The mean number of oocytes obtained was 23.4 +/- 15.4, of which 83% were mature (metaphase II). None of the patients developed any signs or symptoms of OHSS. So far, four clinical pregnancies have been achieved from the embryos obtained during these cycles, including the first birth following this approach. It is concluded that GnRH agonist effectively triggers an endogenous LH surge for final oocyte maturation after ganirelix treatment in stimulated cycles. Our preliminary results suggest that this regimen may prove effective in triggering ovulation and could be said to prevent OHSS in high responders. The efficacy and safety of such new treatment regimen needs to be established in comparative randomized studies.     

Synchronization of endogenous and exogenous FSH stimuli in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)

We have previously observed that exogenous oestradiol can delay the intercycle increase in plasma follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). The increase in plasma FSH that follows discontinuation of exogenous oestradiol peaks after 3 days. We have now studied the possibility of using exogenous oestradiol to synchronize the increase in endogenous FSH with the onset of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) treatment in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). A total of 30 women aged 35.1+/-6.3 years (mean+/-SD) undergoing ovarian stimulation received 2 mg of oestradiol valerate twice daily starting on day 25 of the previous menstrual cycle until the first Tuesday following menses. Ovarian stimulation was initiated 3 days later. On the last day of oestradiol treatment, plasma oestradiol, FSH and luteinizing hormone (LH) (mean+/-SEM) were 566+/-53 (pmol/l), 3.8+/-0.4 (IU/l) and 5.5+/- 0.8 (IU/l) respectively. After 3 days, the FSH and LH (mean+/-SEM) had increased to 6.7+/-0.7 and 6.9+/-0.7 (IU/l) respectively while oestradiol decreased to 251+/-29 (pmol/l). The mean number (+/-SEM) of HMG ampoules used was 25.1+/-2.7 and treatment lasted 11.3+/-0.9 days. Five women became pregnant for a pregnancy rate (ongoing) of 19 (15)%. If all women aged >40 years (six women who did not become pregnant) were excluded from analysis the pregnancy rate (ongoing) was 24 (19%). These results indicate that exogenous oestradiol can safely be used for the synchronization of endogenous and exogenous FSH stimuli in COH. This approach provides the practical advantage of permitting an advanced timing of the onset of COH treatments when gonadotrophin- releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are not used, which improves treatment convenience for patients and team members alike. Further development of this model may enable control of the onset of natural cycles which may find practical applications for timing assisted reproductive techniques (intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization) in the natural cycle.