Esophageal Gunshot Injuries

During a 15-year period from August 1964 to August 1979, 48 patients with gunshot wound of the esophagus (24 of the cervical, 17 of the thoracic, and seven of the abdominal) were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital. In the majority of the patients, the initial history, physical findings, and chest roentgenograms were nondiagnostic for esophageal injury. Esophageal perforation was mainly suspected because the bullet tract was in close proximity to the esophagus or the bullet had traversed the mediastinum. The diagnosis of esophageal perforation was made by esophagography (29 patients), at the time of emergency surgical exploration for suspected other organ injuries (17 patients), or by esophagoscopy (one patient). All but one patient were treated surgically. The surgical procedure most commonly used was primary repair of the esophageal wound with wide drainage of the mediastinum. Thirty-eight (79.2%) of the 48 patients survived, 21 (87.5%) of the 24 patients with cervical, 11 (64.7%) of the 17 patients with thoracic, and six (85.7%) of the seven patients with abdominal esophageal wounds. Ten patients died, three with cervical wound, six with thoracic wound, and one with abdominal esophageal wound. Three patients died intraoperatively from major bleeding and the remaining seven died from the esophageal and/or other associated injuries, four to eight days after surgery. None of the seven patients who underwent primary repair with wide drainage and plication of the suture line with pleural flap or other tissue, died or developed leak at the suture line. This study suggests that the physical and roentgenographic findings in patients with esophageal injury are often nondiagnostic and frequently are masked by coincidental injury to other organs. Hence, a high index of suspicion is required for the diagnosis of esophageal injury from gunshot wounds and esophagography should be performed as soon as the patient's condition is stable in all patients who present with a missile wound in close proximity to the esophagus or traversing the mediastinum. All patients with perforation of the esophagus from bullet wounds should be operated upon as soon as possible after the diagnosis is made. Wide drainage of the mediastinum and primary repair of the esophageal wound and plication of the suture line with parietal pleura or gastric fundus provide the best possible results.     

Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of aggressive conservative therapy in patients with esophageal perforation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of esophageal perforation remains controversial with a bias toward early primary repair, resection, and/or proximal diversion. This review evaluates an alternate approach with a bias toward aggressive drainage of fluid collections and frequent CT and gastographin UGI examinations to evaluate progress. METHODS: From 1992 to 2004, 47 patients with esophageal perforation (10 proximal, 37 thoracic) were treated (18 patients early [<24 hours], 29 late). There were 31 male and 16 females (ages 18-90 years). The etiology was iatrogenic (25), spontaneous (14), trauma (3), dissecting thoracic aneurysm (3), and 1 each following a Stretta procedure and Blakemore tube placement. RESULTS: Six of 10 cervical perforations underwent surgery (3 primary repair, 3 abscess drainage). Nine of 10 perforations healed at discharge. In 37 thoracic perforations, 2 underwent primary repair (1 iatrogenic, 1 spontaneous) and 4 underwent limited thoracotomy. Thirty-4 patients (4 cervical, 28 thoracic) underwent nonoperative treatment. Thirteen of the 14 patients with spontaneous perforation (thoracic) underwent initial nonoperative care. Overall mortality was 4.2% (2 of 47 patients). These deaths represent 2 of 37 thoracic perforations (5.4%). There were no deaths in the 34 patients treated nonoperatively. Esophageal healing occurred in 43 of 45 surviving patients (96%). Subsequent operations included colon interposition in 2, esophagectomy for malignancy in 3, and esophagectomy for benign stricture in 2. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive treatment of sepsis and control of esophageal leaks leak lowers mortality and morbidity, allow esophageal healing, and avoid major surgery in most patients.     

Management of blunt and penetrating external esophageal trauma

The records of 26 patients with external blunt or penetrating esophageal trauma were reviewed to determine clinical features and results of therapy. Twenty-one injuries (four blunt, 17 penetrating) were to the cervical esophagus, and five to the thoracic esophagus. Major physical signs included subcutaneous air, neck hematoma, and blood in the nasogastric tube. Helpful roentgenographic findings were cervical and/or mediastinal air, mediastinal widening, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax (15%). Nine of 12 (75%) contrast studies and five of six (83%) esophagoscopies were positive. Twenty-four patients had associated injuries, the most common of which was tracheal (14 patients) (64%). All patients were managed by prompt surgical exploration, primary closure, and drainage. There were three early deaths. Thirteen patients had postoperative complications, four of which were esophageal leaks. Two of the leaks caused mediastinitis, pleural sepsis, and led to death. They were not treated by early esophageal exclusion or excision. There were no significant strictures or esophageal sequelae in the other patients. It is concluded that early primary closure and drainage results in a relatively high incidence of survival. If a thoracic esophageal leak occurs, aggressive management of prompt esophageal exclusion or excision is necessary to control sepsis and improve survival.     

Treatment of Esophageal Perforation in a Referral Center in Taiwan

Purpose The high mortality associated with esophageal perforation can be reduced by aggressive surgery and good critical care. We report our experience of treating esophageal perforation in a clinic in Taiwan.Methods The subjects were 28 patients who underwent surgery for a benign esophageal perforation.Results The esophageal perforation was iatrogenic in 11 patients, spontaneous in 8, and caused by foreign body injury in 9. Most (22/28) of the patients were seen longer than 24 h after perforation, and 77% had empyema preoperatively. The perforation was located in the cervical area in 5 patients and in the thoracic esophagus in 23. We performed primary repair in 24 patients, esophagectomy in 3, and drainage in 1. Leakage occurred after primary repair in ten (41%) patients, resulting in one death, and two patients died of other diseases. Postoperative leakage prolonged the hospital stay but had no impact on mortality. Overall survival was 90%. Univariate analysis revealed that age, timing of treatment, and cause and location of the perforation influenced outcome, but multivariate analysis failed to identify a predictor of mortality.Conclusions Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal perforation. Primary repair is feasible even if the diagnosis is delayed.     

Diagnosis and management of esophageal perforations.

Esophageal perforation remains a difficult diagnostic and management problem. Recommendations regarding treatment remain controversial. A 15-year experience with perforation of the esophagus from all causes was reviewed at Louisiana State University and Veterans Administration, Medical Centers (Shreveport, LA). The majority of the injuries involved the thoracic esophagus (28 or 54%), followed by the cervical (21 or 40%), and the intraabdominal esophagus (3 or 6%). Iatrogenic causes constituted most of the injuries (52%), followed by external trauma (23%), barogenic rupture (15%), and ingested foreign bodies (10%). Diatrizoate methylglucamine 66 per cent, sodium diatrizoate 10 per cent (Gastrografin; Squibb, Princeton, NJ) contrast studies and flexible esophagoscopy were performed in 44 and 22 patients, respectively. In the cervical esophagus, contrast studies were more sensitive and specific than endoscopy (P less than .01), but both studies were equally effective as diagnostic methods in thoracic perforations. Cervical perforations were treated with either drainage alone (7 patients) or primary repair with drainage (14 patients) with an operative mortality of 4.8 per cent. Several procedures were used in thoracic perforations, which carried a mortality of 36 per cent and were more lethal than cervical tears (P less than 0.2). Any thoracic esophageal perforation treated more than 24 hours after the onset of symptoms, irrespective of what procedure was used, was associated with a significantly higher mortality than if operated on earlier (P less than .001). Five patients with perforated carcinomas were treated by esophageal resection with no mortality. Significantly higher mortality was seen with a delay in diagnosis, thoracic perforations, and Boerhaave's Syndrome. A subset of patients with perforated carcinomas may benefit from esophageal resection with delayed reconstruction.     

Acute tracheobronchial injury

We reviewed our experience with tracheal and bronchial trauma from 1977 to 1988. There were 22 patients with tracheobronchial injuries treated in this period. Seventeen (77%) of the injuries were due to penetrating trauma and five (23%) were due to blunt trauma. Thirteen patients had major associated injuries, including six esophageal injuries. The most common physical findings were tachypnea (13 patients) and subcutaneous emphysema (nine patients). Eight patients presented with airway obstruction. All patients with penetrating cervical tracheal injuries underwent neck exploration and primary repair. All blunt injuries were diagnosed by bronchoscopy. Three patients with blunt injuries were treated with primary repair. Two patients with blunt chest trauma and small bronchial tears were treated nonoperatively with good results. All three deaths (14% mortality rate) were due to associated injuries. We conclude that patients with penetrating tracheobronchial injuries should be managed by surgical exploration and primary repair, although selected patients with blunt injury may be treated nonoperatively.     

Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience

BACKGROUND: Perforation of the thoracic esophagus is a formidable challenge. Treatment and outcome are largely determined by the time to presentation. We reviewed our experience with esophageal perforations to determine the overall mortality and whether the time to presentation should influence management strategy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients treated for perforation of the thoracic esophagus from 1990 to 2001. There were 26 patients (14 men and 12 women; median age, 62 years; range, 36 to 89 years). Fourteen patients presented within 24 hours (early), and 12 patients presented after 24 hours (delayed). Nine of the 12 patients in the delayed group presented after 72 hours. The causes of the perforations were as follows: instrumentation (19 patients), Boerhaave's syndrome (2 patients), intraoperative injury (1 patient), and other (4 patients). In the early group, 3 patients were treated conservatively, 10 patients underwent primary repair, and 1 patient required esophagectomy for carcinoma. In the delayed group, 3 patients were treated conservatively, 6 underwent successful repair of the perforation, 1 had a T-tube placement through the perforation and eventually required an esophagectomy, and 2 had an esophagectomy as primary surgical treatment. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 3.8% (1 of 26) and morbidity was 38% (10 of 26). Persistent leaks occurred in 3 patients, 2 after primary repair and 1 after T-tube drainage. All patients selected for conservative management successfully healed their perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Primary repair can be carried out in most cases of thoracic esophageal perforation regardless of time to presentation, with a low mortality rate. A small but carefully selected group of patients may be treated successfully without operation. Esophagectomy should be reserved for patients with carcinoma or extensive necrosis of the esophagus.     

Tracheobronchial injuries in children.

Five patients with tracheobronchial injuries secondary to blunt thoracic trauma were reviewed over a 9-year period. Bronchial disruption occurred in four cases and tracheal disruption in one. Of the four patients with bronchial disruption, a major airway injury was suspected early because of a large air leak or persistent pulmonary atelectasis. However, definitive diagnosis by bronchoscopy was delayed from 4 to 16 days due to initial response to conservative management. Bronchial repair was achieved in every case: additional lobectomy was required in only one instance. Postoperative bronchial stenosis occurred in one patient and responded well to dilatation. The child with a blowout perforation of the trachea was diagnosed early by bronchoscopy and was successfully managed without surgery. Tracheobronchial injury is one of the most severe injuries caused by blunt trauma and requires a high index of suspicion for early diagnosis and surgery. Bronchial repair is successful in most instances.     

Management of Esophageal Perforation

Despite recent advances in thoracic surgery, the management of esophageal perforation remains problematical and controversial. Thirty-one patients were treated for an esophageal perforation between 1986 and 1998. The esophageal perforation was iatrogenic in 25 cases, spontaneous in 2, traumatic in 2, and caused by a tumor and tuberculous lymphadenitis in 2 patients. There were 10 cervical, 19 thoracic, and 2 abdominal perforations. The interval from perforation to operation was less than 24 h in 12 patients and more than 24 h in 19 patients. The surgical procedures included a primary repair in 12 patients, a resection in 8, and conservative treatment with minor surgical approaches in 11. The mortality rate was 20% (4/20 patients) in the surgical treatment group and 45.5% (5/11 patients) in the conservative treatment with minor surgery group. The overall mortality was 29% (9/31 patients). The prognosis is thus concluded to depend on the cause and location of the perforation, the presence of underlying esophageal diseases, and the surgical procedure chosen. Received: October 12, 1999 / Accepted: May 30, 2000     

Penetrating wounds of the cervical esophagus

To determine trends in management, twenty-two years' experience with penetrating wounds of the cervical esophagus in thirty-nine patients has been evaluated. There were three deaths, all as a result of delayed operative repair. Experience gained from the earlier years of this study led to a marked reduction in mortality in the later years as a result of an increased index of clinical suspicion, coupled with an aggressive operative approach with primary closure and adequate drainage. A nonoperative approach has been suggested by others for small esophageal perforations after endoscopy and perforation from foreign objects. For penetrating injuries of the esophagus, operation and definitive repair is mandatory.     

食管胃颈部器械吻合在食管癌切除术中的应用

目的 探讨食管癌切除后使用消化道圆型吻合器行食管胃颈部吻合的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析2009年8月至2011年4月间河南省人民医院采用一次性圆形吻合器行食管癌切除后食管胃颈部吻合病例的临床资料。结果202例患者中除1例因吻合时部分食管撕裂而需手工缝合修补外,其余均一次吻合成功。无手术死亡病例。术后出现颈部吻合口瘘6例（3．0％）,经保守处理后均在短期内愈合;无胸内吻合口瘘或其他吻合器械相关并发症发生;有2例患者在进食后出现较明显的胃食管反流。经10．2个月的中位随访,全组患者均未发现吻合口狭窄。结论食管癌切除后使用吻合器行食管胃颈部吻合安全、可行。     

Management of panesophageal cancer by blunt resection without thoracotomy and reconstruction with stomach.

Encouraged by their experience since 1978 with blunt esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction in the management of pharyngolaryngeal malignancy, the authors have extended their use of this technique to the management of thoracic esophageal cancer. A study of 43 blunt esophageal resections is presented; 23 were performed in the management of pharyngolaryngeal cancer, and 20 were performed (22 attempted) for the resection of intrathoracic esophageal cancer. In the first group, two deaths occurred secondary to liver failure in cirrhotic patients with moist ascites. One death occurred due to anastomotic leak in the neck of a patient with laryngeal cancer treated with extended mediastinal dissection and tracheal resection for surgical and radiation failure. Two tracheal injuries occurred; one could be managed through the neck, and one required thoractomy for repair. In the 20 resections performed for intrathoracic cancer, there were no deaths, no tracheal injuries, and one chest was explored for bleeding in the splenic bed, which decompressed itself into the right chest. The overall mortality was 7.5%. The evaluation emphasizes: The applicability of this technique for the management of esophageal problems at all levels. The safety of the technique, particularly in the typical population with advanced aged and severe underlying medical illness. Good functional results with palliation and/or cure. The benefit of intact mediastinal pleura in avoiding certain thoracic complications. The authors conclude that blunt esophagectomy is a safe resection procedure with limited morbidity and mortality, and that gastric reconstruction is reliable and affords excellent functional results. They are encouraged to continue management of panesophageal cancer with this technique.     

Esophagogastrostomy with the EEA stapler.

Esophagogastric anastomosis was performed with the EEA stapler in 31 patients who underwent esophageal resections. Anastomoses were accomplished at all levels of the thoracic and cervical esophagus by a variety of approaches. Routine barium cine-esophagograms obtained at seven days after operation failed to demonstrate an anastomotic leak in any patient. The operative mortality rate was 3% (1 of 31 patients). Technical problems occurred during the operation in three patients; in two of these an incomplete anastomosis may have resulted from the surgeon's error. All patients were able to swallow normally at the time of discharge. Late anastomotic stricture occurred in five patients, and responded to dilatation in all but one patient who had local tumor recurrence. We conclude that the EEA stapler allows rapid and reliable esophagogastric anastomosis. Successful use of the instrument requires strict attention to technical detail and awareness of possible pitfalls.     

Surgical treatment of cervical anastomotic leaks following esophageal reconstruction

Cervical anastomotic leaks occurring in the early postoperative period after esophageal reconstruction are life-threatening complications, with a mortality rate similar to that of intrathoracic leaks if the posterior wall of the anastomosis is affected. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment is vital. The surgical procedures commonly used are often inadequate or unsatisfactory because of the difficulties encountered in the subsequent reconstruction. Twelve patient with an early cervical anastomotic leak following elective esophageal surgery were treated using an original surgical technique which allows diversion and simple delayed reconstruction of the anastomosis without risk of late stricture. Uncontrolled mediastinal sepsis accounted for the three deaths of the series and occurred in patients with a leak of the posterior anastomotic wall in whom definitive surgical treatment was delayed.     

Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is a surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus regarding the appropriate management of this life-threatening condition. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of 57 patients with esophageal perforations treated at the Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India, between September 1986 and December 2001. RESULTS: Forty-four (77%) perforations were due to iatrogenic causes, spontaneous perforations occurred in 6 patients (11%). Foreign body ingestion caused perforation in 4 (7%), followed by blunt trauma in 2 (4%) and caustic injury in 1 patient. A total of 6 (11%) patients had cervical injury, 49 (86%) patients had thoracic, and 1 patient had abdominal esophageal injury. Thirty-three (58%) patients underwent emergency esophagectomy, 4 (7%) patients underwent primary repair, and 4 patients (7%) underwent drainage alone, whereas 16 (28%) patients were managed by nonoperative treatment. Using these treatment principles, we achieved 86% survival rate for all patients. Eight (14%) patients died. Spontaneous perforation had the highest mortality (67%). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal perforation needs aggressive treatment. The treatment depends mainly on two factors: perforation in a healthy esophagus, and perforation with a preexisting underlying intrinsic esophageal disease causing distal obstruction. Esophageal perforation associated with stenotic lesions (benign or malignant) needs esophageal extirpation. Perforation in a healthy esophagus should be treated by primary closure if encountered early. Nonoperative conservative treatment is appropriate when esophageal perforation is encountered late.     

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Report of 50 cases

The writers report a clinical series of 50 patients with traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. There were 36 hernias on the left side and 14 on the right. Stab or bullet wound was the cause of the hernia in 27 cases. The other 23 cases were due to traffic accidents or other blunt injuries. Immediate operative repair was done in 30 cases; in 20 cases the operation was carried out after a time interval of 11.5 years post trauma on an average. Plain chest X-ray, barium meal or enema and pneumoperitoneum were the most valuable diagnostic tools. Visceral injuries were discovered in 53% of cases caused by traffic accidents. The omentum, stomach, colon and spleen were the organs most frequently herniated. In two cases perforation of the stomach occurred before the operation. There were three cases of pericardial rupture associated with the diaphragmatic hernia in the series. The repair was done via thoracotomy in 28 cases, via laparotomy in 4 cases; and both thoracotomy and laparotomy were carried out in 18 cases. The hospital mortality was 2%. One of the patients died of peritonitis and renal failure following perforation of the stomach and intestines on the 9th postoperative day. Recurrence of the hernia occurred twice in one case. Re-examination revealed striction of the diaphragmatic movement in 11 cases. The clinical features, diagnosis and operative treatment are discussed.     

同时性多原发食管癌

目的 探讨同时性多原发食管癌的临床特点、诊断和治疗.方法 采用回顾性研究的方法,对收治的32例同时性多原发食管癌的临床资料进行总结、分析.结果 全组食管双原发灶30例,三原发灶2例,共66个病灶,其中位于颈段22个,胸上段10个,胸中段19个,胸下段15个.66个病灶中,鳞癌65个,腺癌1个.32例中术前确诊26例.32例均采用手术治疗,其中4例行探查手术,1例行姑息切除手术,余27例行完全性切除手术.术后病理食管残端阳性2例.术后出现并发症8例.术后随访28例,1、3和5年生存率分别为76.9％、43.3％和14.8％.结论 完善的术前检查可显著提高同时性多原发食管癌的确诊率,手术是其较好治疗方法.     

颈椎前路手术并发食管瘘的原因及处理

 目的 探讨颈椎前路手术并发食管瘘的原因及处理对策。方法 回顾性分析2004年1月至2011年12月采用颈椎前路手术治疗2348例颈椎疾患患者资料,其中5例发生食管瘘,男3例,女2例;年龄14~48岁,平均34岁;颈椎外伤3例,颈椎病1例,颈椎结核1例。1例患者术中发现食管瘘,给予修补;另4例均为术后发现,行清创探查引流术,其中1例探查时发现食管瘘口遂给予修补,1例仅行清创探查术,1例清创探查术后二期行内固定取出术,1例清创探查术后二期行内固定取出及肌瓣填塞术。给予禁食、营养支持、伤口引流及抗生素治疗;定期吞服亚甲蓝,观察漏口情况。结果 经过9～61周治疗,所有患者食管瘘口愈合,恢复进食。随访6～48个月,无一例发生食管瘘复发、颈椎失稳及迟发感染;吞咽功能均良好;患者原有颈部疾患治疗效果均满意,颈椎外伤患者Frankel分级平均提高1级,颈椎病患者JOA评分由术前9分提高至术后15分。结论 采用食管瘘口修补、肌瓣填塞以及引流手术,并严格禁食禁水、营养支持,必要时取出内固定物,多数颈椎前路手术并发食管瘘的患者能获得满意的疗效。术中仔细轻柔操作是预防食管瘘发生的关键。     

Combination of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for early cancer of the thoracic esophagus

From June 1997 to July 2002, we enrolled 10 patients with T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma according to the findings of chest computerized tomography scans and transesophageal ultrasound. There were nine men and one woman. The average age was 57.1 years (range, 43-70 years). We performed a combination of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery including endoscopic esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymph nodes dissection for early thoracic esophageal carcinoma as well as hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric mobilization as an esophageal substitute under double-lumen intubated anesthesia. The average operative time was 330 minutes (range, 290-425 minutes). The average hospital stay was 11.2 days (range, 9-17 days). There was no surgical mortality or severe complication except one mild leakage of cervical esophagogastrostomy. All patients have tolerated solid food well and are still alive, without evidence of tumor recurrence, after a mean of 37.2 months of follow-up (range, 9-62 months). In conclusion, we suggest that a combination of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymph nodes dissection and hand-assisted laparoscopic mobilization of stomach via a hand-port device for esophageal reconstruction is a safe and feasible operation for patients with T1 thoracic esophageal carcinoma.     

Factors affecting the prognosis of multiply injured patients: an analysis of 1169 consecutive cases

When analysing 1169 multiply injured patients treated in the intensive care unit between 1966 and 1984 we noticed a dramatic fall in mortality from a level of about 14.6 per cent to 4.8 per cent since 1981. The patient populations and accident patterns were surprisingly identical, though since 1981 the severity of thoracic injuries has increased and the brain injuries decreased. The fall in mortality was great for all causes of death but most significant for patients with severe thoracic, brain and cervical spine injuries. The trend is to treat more and more fractures operatively and immediately after the injury. There has been a better diagnosis of all injuries according to autopsy findings. An attitude of prophylactic treatment on a respirator which leads to better oxygenation, together with a well-organized, co-ordinated injury care system with systematized diagnostic, laboratory and therapeutic procedures, are among the most important factors in the lowering of the mortality.