Once-daily extended-release levetiracetam as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Purpose:   Double-blind randomized trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended-release levetiracetam (LEV XR) tablets (2 × 500 mg) as add-on therapy in patients (12–70 years old) with partial-onset seizures (POS) refractory to one to three antiepileptic drugs.
Methods:   After an 8-week prospective baseline-period, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to once-daily LEV XR 1,000 mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks. Evaluations included changes from baseline in POS-frequency/week, responders (≥50% reduction in POS-frequency/week), seizure-freedom, adverse events, laboratory tests, physical and neurologic examinations, vital signs, body-weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram.
Results:   Of 188 patients screened, 158 were randomized (intention-to-treat population): LEV XR (n = 79) or placebo (n = 79). Seventy-one (89.9%) LEV XR and 72 (91.1%) placebo patients completed the trial. Median POS-frequency/week reduction was 46.1% on LEV XR and 33.4% on placebo. Estimated reduction with LEV XR over placebo was 14.4% (p   =   0.038). Thirty-four (43%) LEV XR and 23 (29.1%) placebo patients experienced ≥50% reduction in POS-frequency/week. Eight (10.1%) patients receiving LEV XR and one (1.3%) receiving placebo were free of POS during the 12-week treatment period. Forty-one (53.2%) LEV XR and 43 (54.4%) placebo patients reported ≥1 adverse event. Adverse events reported with an incidence >5% and seen more often with LEV XR than with placebo were somnolence, influenza, irritability, nasopharyngitis, dizziness, and nausea .
Discussion:   Once-daily LEV XR 1,000 mg was effective and well-tolerated as adjunct therapy in patients with POS. Ten percent of patients randomized to LEV XR experienced freedom from POS. These results support the clinical value of this new LEV XR formulation.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil to improve memory in epilepsy

PURPOSE: To determine whether an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, such as donepezil, would improve memory or other cognitive/psychological functions in epilepsy patients with subjective memory complaints. METHODS: Twenty-three epilepsy patients with subjective memory difficulty were randomized to either 3 months of donepezil (10 mg/day) or 3 months of placebo treatment, and then crossed over to the other treatment arm. Patients and physicians were blinded to treatment phase throughout data acquisition. Assessment of memory and other cognitive functions, subjective memory, mood, and self-rated quality of life (QOL) and social functioning was performed at baseline and following completion of both treatment phases. Seizure frequency and severity as well as treatment emergent adverse effects were also monitored. RESULTS: Donepezil treatment was not associated with improvement in memory or other cognitive functions, mood, social functioning or QOL. Comparable increases in self-rated memory functioning relative to baseline were evident during donepezil and placebo phases. Donepezil treatment was not associated with increased seizure frequency or severity. Similar to group results, analysis of change within individual patients as a function of treatment phase also showed neither significant benefit nor detriment associated with donepezil. CONCLUSION: This study found no benefit on memory or other cognitive/psychological functions in a heterogeneous group of epilepsy patients with subjective memory difficulty. Further investigation would be required to determine whether individual patients, or those with particular epilepsy syndromes, might benefit from donepezil or other acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, or if a higher dosage might be effective.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of topiramate in essential tremor

The antiepileptic drug topiramate has been reported to improve essential tremor, but clinical trials have been small and of unsatisfactory design. We undertook a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of topiramate in essential tremor, using accelerometry, spirography, and an activities of daily living questionnaire.Sixteen subjects were recruited between January and June 2002. Three withdrew consent, 13 commenced the study, and 10 finished it. Subjects were assessed at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment (placebo or topiramate doses 25, 50, and 100 mg daily). Following a washout period of 1 week, patients crossed over to the alternate arm of the study. Statistical analysis followed the method described by Altman.There was no period effect or treatment-period interaction. No outcome measure improved significantly in the active treatment period as compared with the placebo control period, although 4 of the 10 patients improved in at least 2 of the 3 outcome measures during the active treatment phase, and none during the control treatment phase.This study provided no evidence of therapeutic benefit of topiramate in essential tremor. A marginally larger study would be required formally to exclude a useful therapeutic effect. To achieve a study with a power of 80% to exclude the null hypothesis, at least 17 patients would be required using accelerometry, 19 using spirography, and 2,00 using an activities of daily living questionnaire.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in adult patients with refractory partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult Chinese patients with refractory partial epilepsy were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: A total of 46 patients who had four or more complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization within an 8-week baseline phase were enrolled. Patients were assigned randomly to receive TPM (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23). TPM or placebo was titrated to target doses of 300 mg/d for 6 weeks and maintained at stabilized levels for another 8 weeks. Concomitant antiepileptic drugs remained at constant previous levels during the trial. RESULTS: In all, 41 patients completed the trial (TPM group, n = 20; placebo group, n = 21). The proportion of patients with a > or =50% reduction from baseline in complex partial seizures was 11 of 23 (47.8%) in the TPM group and 3 of 23 (13.0%) in the placebo group (p = 0.01). In addition, patients treated with TPM had significantly better investigator (p = 0.014) and patient (p = 0.0005) global assessment scores than patients in the placebo group. Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Two patients with TPM therapy complained of weight loss. Routine blood cell counts and other laboratory results showed no significant changes from baseline in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: TPM 300 mg/d is effective and well tolerated as treatment for refractory partial epilepsy in adults.     

Add-on melatonin improves sleep behavior in children with epilepsy: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in epileptic children, aged 3 to 12 years, evaluated the effect of add-on melatonin on the sleep behavior of these children on sodium valproate monotherapy using a parental questionnaire. Of the 31 patients, 16 randomly received add-on melatonin, whereas 15 received add-on placebo. The questionnaire showed good internal consistency in our patient population (Cronbach's alpha = .83). The percentage decrease in the median total sleep score was 24.4 (range 0.0-34.9) in the valproate + melatonin group compared with 14.0 (range -2.2-18.8) in the valproate + placebo group, the difference being statistically significant (P < .05). The median percentage decrease in the parasomnias score was 60 (range 0.0-70.8) in the valproate + melatonin group compared with 36.4 (range 0.0-63.2) in the valproate + placebo group, the difference being statistically significant (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the percentage decrease in the daytime drowsiness scores and sleep fragmentation scores. Parent-child interaction subscale scores were not significantly different between age groups. The age at onset of seizures and the type of seizures did not correlate significantly to the total sleep scores. Given that sleep problems are known to complicate epilepsy, add-on melatonin, which has a wide safety window, can be of promise in the pharmacotherapy of pediatric epilepsy.     

The impact of caring for adults with intellectual disability on the quality of life of parents

Background Because of an increase in life expectancy and de‐institutionalisation, many adults with intellectual disability (ID) live with and are cared for by their parents throughout their adult lives. Because of caring demands, the quality of life (QOL) of parents may be affected. The study explored the impact of caring for an adult with ID on the QOL of parents. Methods Participants were 12 parents who were the full‐time carers of an adult with ID. Participants were interviewed about the effect of caring on their QOL. Interviews were analysed thematically. Results Caring had a positive impact on QOL by enabling participants to develop relationships and receive support, participate in leisure activities, achieve a sense of personal satisfaction and enable a more positive appraisal of their lives. Caring had a negative impact on participants' QOL by restricting their relationships, leisure activities and employment opportunities. Caring was also associated with financial insecurity, frustrations at the service system and fear of what the future held for their offspring. Conclusions Caring for an adult with ID had both positive and negative effects on parents' QOL. Improving services and service delivery, including the provision of residential services and respite, would address many of the issues that were reported to have a negative impact on parents' QOL.     

Neurocognitive effects of adjunctive levetiracetam in children with partial-onset seizures: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial

Purpose : Evaluate potential neurocognitive effects of adjunctive levetiracetam in children with inadequately controlled partial‐onset seizures (POS). Methods : Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, noninferiority safety study. Children (4–16 years; IQ ≥65) with ≥1 POS during 4 weeks before screening despite taking 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were randomized (2:1) to levetiracetam (20–60 mg/kg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Results : Ninety‐nine patients were randomized with 98 (levetiracetam 64, placebo 34) in intent‐to‐treat (ITT) and 73 (levetiracetam 46, placebo 27) in per protocol (PP) populations. Primary cognitive assessment was the Leiter International Performance Scale–Revised Attention and Memory Battery with the memory screen composite score change from baseline as the primary endpoint. PP Least Square Mean [LSM (standard error)] were 5.36 (1.78) for levetiracetam; 5.17 (2.33) for placebo; difference [two‐sided 90% confidence interval (CI)] 0.19 (?4.69, 5.08). Levetiracetam was noninferior to placebo because the 90% CI lower bound was greater than the defined noninferiority margin (?9.0). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning‐2 indexes and Leiter‐R Examiner’s Rating Scale scores. Median reductions from baseline in weekly POS frequency were 91.5% versus 26.5% for levetiracetam versus placebo; ≥50% responder rates: 62.5% versus 41.2%; seizure freedom rates: 46.9% versus 8.8% (ITT). Adverse events were reported by 89.1% levetiracetam‐treated and 85.3% placebo‐treated patients; those reported by ≥10% levetiracetam patients and more often with levetiracetam were headache, nasopharyngitis, fatigue, vomiting, somnolence, and aggression. Discussion : Neurocognitive effects were no different in pediatric patients with POS treated with adjunctive levetiracetam or placebo. Levetiracetam was effective and well tolerated.     

Pregabalin add-on treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study in adults with partial seizures

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate pregabalin (PGB), 150 mg/day, and PGB, 600 mg/day, as an add‐on treatment for patients with refractory partial seizures concurrently treated with one to three anticonvulsants (AEDs). Methods: An international (13 countries), multicenter (45 centers), 12‐week, double‐blind, randomized study in which patients with partial seizures received placebo (n = 96); PGB, 150 mg/day (n = 99); or PGB, 600 mg/day (n = 92); given 3 times a day (t.i.d.). The primary efficacy criterion was reduction in seizure frequency during treatment as compared with baseline, as measured by RRatio, the symmetrical percentage change in seizure rates determined from daily seizure diaries. The RRatio between the 8‐week baseline (pretreatment phase) and the 12‐week treatment period were compared between each of the PGB groups and the placebo group by using an analysis of variance analysis of the intent‐to‐treat population. Results: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, were both significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the RRatio [–11.5 (p = 0.0007) and –31.4 (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively, vs. 0.9]. These RRatio values correspond to seizure‐frequency reductions from baseline of –1.8, 20.6, and 47.8% for placebo, 150 mg/day, and 600 mg/day, respectively. PGB efficacy was significantly dose related (p ≤ 0.0001). Secondary efficacy variables corroborated the findings of the primary analysis. Significantly more patients were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) in the PGB, 600 mg/day (43.5%), group than in the placebo group (6.2%) (p ≤ 0.001). PGB was well tolerated. Dose‐related, treatment‐emergent adverse events (≥10%), mostly mild or moderate in intensity, were somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, diplopia, and weight gain. The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 10% of patients at 150 mg/day and 18.5% of patients at 600 mg/day, compared with 6.2% of patients receiving placebo. Conclusions: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, is highly effective and well‐tolerated add‐on therapy in patients with partial seizures.     

Cognitive adverse events of topiramate in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability

Topiramate (TPM) is an effective antiepileptic drug (AED). A high proportion of patients, however, experiences cognitive adverse events (CAEs), especially in verbal fluency, memory spans, and working memory. To our knowledge, CAEs of TPM have not been studied systematically in patients with intellectual disability (ID). This may be due to the fact that many of those patients are not able to follow test instructions properly and that neuropsychological instruments are not validated for that group. Cognitive deterioration in patients with ID may thus easily be overlooked. Topiramate is in frequent use in persons with ID. We included 26 consecutive patients with epilepsy and ID in this observational study who had undergone neuropsychological examinations as part of clinical routine before and after the introduction of TPM into the therapeutic regimen (n = 4) or before and after the withdrawal of TPM (n = 22). Examinations under TPM showed reduced cognitive speed, reduced verbal memory, reduced verbal fluency, and reduced flexibility compared to examinations without TPM. Despite some limitations (especially small sample size, high interindividual variation of the results dependent on the degree of ID, effects of other – limited – changes in the therapeutic regimen), our study indicates that TPM in persons with epilepsy and ID may lead to CAEs comparable to those in persons with normal intelligence. Neuropsychological testing is mandatory in order not to miss CAEs that might severely impair quality of life.     

Add-on melatonin improves quality of life in epileptic children on valproate monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in epileptic children aged 3-12 years evaluated the effects of add-on melatonin administration on the quality of life of these children on sodium valproate (VPA) monotherapy using a parental questionnaire. Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy is a questionnaire designed to assess a variety of age-relevant domains such as physical function, emotional well-being, cognitive function, social function, behavior, and general health. Of the 31 patients, 16 randomly received add-on melatonin (MEL), whereas 15 received add-on placebo (P). The questionnaire had good internal consistency reliability, because for most of the multi-item scales Cronbach's alpha reliability exceeded 0.5 (range: 0.59-0.94). To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing quality of life in epileptic children with add-on melatonin administration in the form of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The study suggests a potential use of melatonin as an adjunct to antiepileptic therapy due to its diverse spectrum of action as an antioxidant, neuroprotector, and free radical scavenger, thus offering the advantage of reducing oxidant stress and subsequent damage. The beneficial effects of melatonin on sleep, its wide safety window, and its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier have the potential to improve quality of life in pediatric epilepsy.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of topiramate treatment for essential tremor

The safety and efficacy of topiramate (400 mg/d or maximum tolerated dose) as monotherapy or adjunctive treatment of essential tremor were investigated in a placebo-controlled, crossover study (n = 24). Topiramate resulted in significantly greater reductions from baseline based on normalized scores for a clinical rating of tremor location/severity, specific motor tasks/functional disabilities, and tremor-resultant functional disabilities. Most common adverse events were appetite suppression/weight loss and paresthesias.     

Symptoms of psychopathology in adults with intellectual disability and seizures

Seizures are more common in individuals with intellectual disabilities than in the general population. As a result, differences in functioning for individuals with intellectual disability with and without seizures have been evaluated. Research on differences in psychopathology for individuals with intellectual disability with and without seizures has been mixed. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in subscale scores on the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped-II (DASH-II) between individuals with intellectual disability with and without seizures. In this study, 321 individuals from two large developmental centers in the southeastern United States were administered the DASH-II. Researchers found that the seizure group endorsed significantly more symptoms on the mood subscale than the group without seizures. No other group differences were found to be significant. Implications of these results are discussed.     

Predictors of health-related and global quality of life among young adults with difficult-to-treat epilepsy and mild intellectual disability

ObjectiveThis study evaluated predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and global quality of life (QOL) among young adults with difficult-to-treat epilepsy and mild intellectual disability.MethodsOne hundred and forty-two persons with epilepsy and cognitive problems were routinely screened on HRQOL, global QOL, and psychological distress four weeks after admission to a time-limited residential rehabilitation unit. The PESOS scales (PE = PErformance, SO = SOciodemographic aspects, S = Subjective evaluation/estimation) on epilepsy-specific problems were administered as measures of HRQOL; a questionnaire on life satisfaction and an item on overall QOL were used as measures of global QOL. Psychological distress was captured with the Symptom Checklist 90-R. Further data were gained from medical files. Quality-of- life predictors were identified using univariate methods and stepwise regression analyses.ResultsPsychological distress was the only predictor of all HRQOL and global QOL parameters. Seizure frequency was a predictor of most HRQOL variables. Other epilepsy variables affected only some HRQOL variables but were not associated with global QOL. Health-related quality of life did not seem to be strongly impaired. Only low correlations were found between HRQOL and global QOL.ConclusionThe notion of psychological distress as the most influential predictor of all QOL measures is in line with most findings on QOL in epilepsy. Former observations of weak associations between HRQOL and global QOL among patients with epilepsy and mild intellectual disability are supported. Thus, interventions to reduce psychological distress, besides epilepsy treatment, seem to be of great importance to improve QOL.     

传统抗癫痫药物和妥泰对成年癫痫患者生活质量的影响

目的 评价传统抗癫痫药物和妥泰对成年癫痫患者生活质量的影响。方法 102例临床新确诊的成年癫痫患者被随机分为两组：一组予以传统抗癫痫药物单药系统治疗(AEDs组)，另一组予以妥泰单药治疗(TPM组)。1个月后比较两组的发作频率和不良反应。并用QOLIE-30表对这102例癫痫患者进行生活质量评定。结果 TPM组的发作频率和不良反应均明显低于AEDs组，而生活质量总分明显高于AEDs组，尤其在前五项的评分中更加明显。结论 TPM能提高癫痫患者的生活质量，其改善生活质量的作用主要是通过控制发作和减轻不良反应实现的。     

Treatment of bulimia nervosa with topiramate in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, part 2: improvement in psychiatric measures

BACKGROUND: We conducted a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine the efficacy of topiramate in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. Primary efficacy analyses showed that topiramate treatment significantly reduced days on which patients binged and/or purged. This article describes further analyses investigating topiramate's effect on psychological symptoms associated with disordered eating. METHOD: Patients with DSM-IV bulimia nervosa were randomly assigned to receive topiramate (N = 35) or placebo (N = 34) for 10 weeks. Topiramate treatment was started at 25 mg/day and titrated by 25 to 50 mg/week to a maximum of 400 mg/day. Secondary psychiatric endpoints, including the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI), Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and Patient Global Improvement (PGI) were assessed for change from baseline in the topiramate versus placebo group. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients receiving topiramate and 33 receiving placebo were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Percent change from baseline on the EDI indicated significantly greater improvement in the topiramate group compared with the placebo group for subscales measuring bulimia/uncontrollable overeating (p =.005), body dissatisfaction (p =.007), and drive for thinness (p =.002). The EAT showed significant improvement in the topiramate group compared with the placebo group for the bulimia/food preoccupation (p =.019) and dieting (p =.031) subscales and the total score (p =.022). For the topiramate group, the reduction in mean HAM-A score was significantly greater (p =.046) than that in the placebo group, while reduction in HAM-D scores was greater in the topiramate group compared with the placebo group but did not reach statistical significance (p =.069). Significantly more patients treated with topiramate compared with placebo reported improvement on the PGI (p =.004). CONCLUSION: Topiramate treatment improves multiple behavioral dimensions of bulimia nervosa. Binge and purge behaviors are reduced, and treatment is associated with improvements in self-esteem, eating attitudes, anxiety, and body image. These results support topiramate as a viable therapeutic option for the treatment of bulimia nervosa. Additional, longer-term multicenter trials are indicated.