Fragility fractures of the distal humerus: What is the optimal treatment?

In light of the growing number of elderly osteopenic patients with distal humeral fractures, we discuss the history of their management and current trends. Under most circumstances operative fixation and early mobilisation is the treatment of choice, as it gives the best results. The relative indications for and results of total elbow replacement versus internal fixation are discussed.     

External dynamic fixation in fractures of the humerus: can it still be considered treatment of second choice?

The authors report 40 patients affected with diaphyseal fracture of the humerus treated by dynamic axial fixator (FAD Orthofix). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. A clinical and radiographic retrospective study was conducted with the purpose of verifying the validity of external fixation as treatment of choice in diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. The results were evaluated considering healing time, extent and type of complications, long-term clinical, radiographic and functional findings. Results were: excellent: 35; good: 2; fair: 2; poor: 1. Complications were: nonunione: 1; reimplantation of FAD screws: 1; 4 infections of the screw holes, 3 realignments due to secondary displacement, 1 re-fracture after removal of the implant. There were no iatrogenic lesions of the radial nerve, or infections of the fracture site. The authors conclude that this semi-invasive, versatile and well-tolerated method, may be considered a valid alternative to conservative treatment, or to internal fixation even in cases of single trauma, despite limits related to the degree of collaboration of the patient, particularly with regard to debridement of the screw holes and periodical clinical and radiographic monitoring.     

Open reduction and internal fixation of un-united fractures of the distal radius: does the size of the distal fragment affect the result?

Two cohort populations consisting of 13 patients with an un-united fracture of the distal radius in whom the distal fragment had more than 5 mm of subchondral bone supporting the articular surface distal to the site of the nonunion and ten patients with an un-united fracture of the distal radius with a smaller distal fragment were compared. There were no preoperative differences with respect to age, gender, interval between injury and index procedure, preoperative amount of radius tilt, ulnar inclination and ulnar variance, or the preoperative function. Independent of the size of the distal fragment in all patients the distal radius was restored to gain bony union and realignment with preservation of some wrist motion. The length of the follow-up period averaged 30 months for the small fragment group compared with 22 months for the large fragment group. Bony union was achieved in 22 patients. One patient out of the large fragment group failed to heal the fracture and had wrist fusion. At the follow-up examination there were no significant differences in the radiological and clinical outcome between the two groups. No differences were seen on total range of motion of forearm supination and pronation with an average of 135 degrees in the large fragment group and 145 degrees in the small fragment group. Wrist motion revealed no significant differences in the flexion-extension arc, averaging 90 degrees in the large fragment group and 83 degrees in the small fragment group. Total range of motion of radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist was similar, averaging 39 degrees in the large fragment group and 43 degrees in the small fragment group. Grip strength averaged 59% compared with the opposite limb for the large fragment group and 67% for the small fragment group. We believe that the results of reconstruction of un-united fractures of the distal end of the radius for patients in whom the distal fragment had less than 5 mm of subchondral bone supporting the articular surface distal to the site of the nonunion are comparable to the results for patients with a larger distal fragment. Therefore, we believe that surgeons should try to preserve even a small amount of wrist motion and reserve wrist fusion as a final resort.     

Thermal injury in the elderly: when is comfort care the right choice?

The factors contributing to a higher mortality rate in elderly thermal injury victims are not well delineated. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of the initial injury, medical comorbidities, and burn size on patient outcome and to determine a level of injury in this population when comfort care is an appropriate first choice. Individual medical records of patients over 65 years of age admitted to our burn center over a 10-year interval were reviewed for patient demographics, mechanism of injury, total body surface area (TBSA) burned, medical comorbidities, use of Swan-Ganz catheters, evidence of inhalation injury, level of support, and patient outcome. The mechanisms of thermal injury were flame (68%), scald (21%) and electrical or chemical contact (11%). Twenty-six preventable bathing, cooking, and smoking-related injuries were seen (33%). The average TBSA was 25 per cent. Average length of stay varied depending on outcome. The overall mortality rate for this group was 45 per cent. Patients older than 80 years with 40 per cent or greater TBSA burned had a 100 per cent mortality rate despite aggressive treatment. Burn wound size correlated better with probability of poor outcome than age. Thermal injuries in the elderly are becoming more important with the aging of our population. Underlying medical problems--specifically chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--do play a role in increased patient morbidity and mortality. This study shows that age greater than 80 years in combination with burns greater than 40 per cent TBSA are uniformly fatal despite aggressive therapy. We believe that delaying the start of comfort-only measures in this situation only prolongs the pain and suffering for the patient, the family, and the physician.     

Fractures of the distal forearm. Which therapy is indicated when?

Every 15th case of a bone fracture in patients aged more than 65 years concerns the distal radius in Germany. This means the second rank of all geriatric fractures following fractures of the hip. According to the approved and increased apply of operative stabilisation there are arising more and more reports upon poor results of nonsurgical treatment. Especially in older patients the main reason for the discontented outcome of conservative management is osteoporosis, which is an affirmative circumstance for the genesis of fracture but also for secondary mal-aligment of comminuted thin cortical walls and crushed porotic cancellous bone. The rational of this perception is either filling artificial bonelike tissue--avoiding the need of harvest cancellous bone graft from a second surgical site--into the resultant cavity following reduction, or supplementary trans-styloidal or intrafocal K-wiring until remodeling is obtained within an average of 10 weeks. Both arrangements should be secured in addition with a trans-articular external fixation. According to a literature review and our own experiences of 92 follow up cases of distal radius fractures in patients who were older than 65 years this procedure seems to be superior at present for A-2, A-3 and most cases of type-C fractures of the distal radius, despite the disadvantage of joint immobilisation for about 5 weeks. Type B-fractures, however, should be provided better with an internal fixation. Sudeck's algodystrophia is the mostly serious complication of the distal radius fracture and its treatment in older patients. Recognising punctually neurovegetative stimulated patients, treat them cautiously and coming in on their special situation is usually the best way to reduce this risk. To pay attention to the topography of the nerves during the application of the pins and to act at the first signs of complications immediately is also very important. We examined 92 patients who were older than 65 years with a fracture of the distal end of the radius in a follow up study. In this group we treated 62 distal radius fractures of the type A and C of the AO classification with an trans-articular external fixateur and with supplementary measures if necessary. Additionally we filled the bone cavity with an artificial bone graft (Endobon) following closed reduction in 32 cases, 12 times a complementary K-wiring was added and in 8 cases the external fixateur was combined with both. Sudeck's disease appeared in 1.1% of all cases. In 5 cases we recorded complications with an obligation to treatment as well. Lesion of the superficial branch of the radial nerve were noted in 2 cases (2.1%), as far as we extended the surgical approach for the pin application. Technical problems from the site of the external fixateur appeared in 3 cases, two of them could be attributed to an infirmity of the fixateurs ball joints which is now eliminated by the producer. 4 patients with a type-B fracture was provided by plating, additionally 4 patients with a type-C fracture because of non-compliance. The external fixateur is an essential part of a differentiated treatment with reference to the several types of distal radius fractures in older patients.     

External or internal fixation in the treatment of non-reducible distal radial fractures?: A 5-year follow-up of a randomized study involving 50 patients

Background and purpose

We have previously shown in a randomized study that in the first year after treatment, open reduction and internal fixation resulted in better grip strength and forearm rotation than closed reduction and bridging external fixation. In the present study, we investigated whether this difference persists over time.

Patients and methods

The 50 patients included in the original study (mean age 53 years, 36 women) were sent a QuickDASH questionnaire and an invitation to a radiographic and clinical examination after a mean of 5 (3–7) years.

Results

All 50 patients returned the QuickDASH questionnaire and 45 participated in the clinical and radiographic examination. In the internal fixation group, the grip strength was 95% (SD 12) of the uninjured side and in the external fixation group it was 90% (SD 21) of the uninjured side (p = 0.3). QuickDASH score, range of motion, and radiographic parameters were similar between the groups.

Interpretation

The difference originally found between internal and external fixation in distal radial fractures at 1 year regarding grip strength and range of motion was found to diminish with time. At 5 years, both groups had approached normal values.In unstable, non-reducible distal radial fractures, surgical treatment is recommended but can be complex. The choice of method is still controversial (Chen and Jupiter 2007), especially regarding the result over time (Downing and Karantana 2008). External fixation has been the method of choice for decades (Atroshi et al. 2006, Krukhaug et al. 2009), but with the introduction of the volar locking plate technique, internal fixation has rapidly become more and more popular—but without any solid evidence (Margaliot et al. 2005).Recently, we showed in a randomized study that open reduction and internal fixation (O) of distal radial fractures using the TriMed fragment-specific system resulted in better grip strength and forearm rotation than closed reduction and bridging external fixation (C) (Abramo et al. 2009). The difference was seen early (at 3 months), which might be expected since the mobilization started earlier, but the difference prevailed at the 1-year follow-up. That study was initiated to investigate whether better anatomical reduction, achieved by the open technique, was important for the final result. Apart from the positive results regarding rotation and grip strength after internal fixation, we found a tendency for closed reduction to result in more malunions, but the difference was not statistically significant. Subjective outcome was similar between the groups, which we believe is either due to an absence of such a difference or to blunt outcome instruments. In the present report, we evaluated the same cohort at a later point in time, between 3 and 7 years, with the primary aim of determining whether the superior short-term results of internal fixation in unstable distal radial fractures persist over time.     

What is the place of internal urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral stricture disease?

As a treatment for male urethral stricture, internal urethrotomy (IU) has the advantages of ease, simplicity, speed and short convalescence. Various modifications of the single cold-knife incision in the 12 o'clock position have been proposed, but there are no prospective, randomized studies to prove their claims of greater efficacy. IU can be performed as an outpatient procedure using local anesthesia, with an indwelling silicone catheter for 3 days after the procedure. Complications of IU are usually minor, including infection and hemorrhage. The reported success rate of IU varies, mainly because of differences in the definition of success and the duration of follow-up. Strictures can recur, usually within 3-12 months of IU. There are several known risk factors for recurrence: a previous IU, penile and membranous strictures, long (>2 cm) and multiple strictures, untreated perioperative urinary infection and extensive periurethral spongiofibrosis. Repeated IU might be useful in patients who have a stricture recurrence more than 6 months after the initial procedure, but repeat IU offers no long-term cure after a third IU, or if a stricture recurs within 3 months of the first IU. Such patients should be offered urethroplasty. Repeated IU followed by long-term self-dilation is an alternative option for men with severe comorbidity and limited life expectancy, or those who have failed previous urethroplasty. Overall, IU has a lower success rate (+/-60%) than urethroplasty (+/-80-90%), but if used for selected strictures, the success rate of IU could approach that of urethroplasty.     

External fixation in comminuted,displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: is it sufficient?

Introduction: External fixation has been extensively used to treat the intra-articular fractures of the distal radius and it has several distinct advantages over conventional POP cast and plate fixation. However, the limitation of external fixation to achieve articular congruity in the comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal radius has been documented in the literature. This could be because external fixation alone does not expand crushed cancellous bone and cannot work without soft tissue hinges. This prospective study was conducted to look at the results of comminuted, displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius treated exclusively by external fixation. Materials and methods: A 2-year follow-up of 27 patients with comminuted, displaced intra-articular fractures of distal radius that were treated exclusively by external fixation is presented. The radiological results, functional results and complications were analyzed according to the scoring system given by Jakim et al. Results: Anatomical reduction could not be achieved in 12 patients (44%) and reduction was lost in two patients (7%). Excellent and good results were seen in 59.3%, fair results were seen in 22.2% and poor results were seen in 18.5% of the cases. Outcome scores of patients without articular step were significantly better as compared to the patients with articular step at healing. There was a positive correlation between the restoration of normal anatomy (radiological results) and the functional outcome (r=0.775). Overall nine patients (33%) had complications. Conclusion: We conclude that although the external fixation is reliable in maintaining the reduction in displaced comminuted intra-articular fractures, it is inadequate in restoring articular congruity in many cases. The complications of external fixation are frequent and may be potentially serious in nature.     

Distal humerus fractures in the elderly: osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis? Review of the literature

Fractures of the distal humerus in adults are rare but challenging for the orthopaedic trauma surgeon. The bimodal distribution reflects the trauma mechanism. While distal humerus fractures are caused by high-energy traumata in young male adults, a fall from a standing height is the most common reason for humerus fractures among elderly females. As a rule, fractures of the distal humerus are treated surgically. In young patients, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with anatomic locking plates are the gold standard. In elderly patients, reconstruction is not always possible, and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) becomes necessary. The present article provides an overview of the current diagnostic and treatment recommendations. The current literature is reviewed and the results discussed.     

Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly—outcome and complications after locking plate fixation

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates or primary arthroplasty remains a controversial issue in the management of complex proximal humerus fractures. Aim of this study was to evaluate the surgeon- and patient-based outcome of patients older than 65 years who underwent ORIF using locking plate fixation of a 3- or 4-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Twenty-seven patients older than 65 years were treated with locking plate fixation (PHILOS, Fa. Synthes, Umkirch, Germany). At an average follow-up of 44 months, the clinical and the subjective outcome were evaluated, and complications were analyzed. The mean age- and gender-related Constant score was 70% (30–100%) compared with 92% (47–108%) of the contralateral non-injured shoulder. The mean DASH score was 29 points (0–71). Five patients (18.5%) showed clinical signs of an impingement, which was related to malpositioning of the plate in 3 cases. Screw cutout was seen in 22.2% (6 patients). Avascular necrosis of the head or the tubercula was found in 8 patients (29.6%). The revision rate was 29.6%. However, the patients considered the functional status of their shoulder as “good” or “satisfactory.” The functional and patient-orientated results of the locking plate fixation of complex displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are comparable to those of primary arthroplasty and minimally invasive treatment. Proper surgical technique (screw length, plate position) is mandatory for reducing the revision rate.     

Nail plate combination in fractures of the distal femur in the elderly: A new paradigm for optimum fixation and early mobilization?

Distal femoral fractures in elderly or osteoporotic patients constitute a challenging injury, especially in the settings of fracture comminution or periprosthetic fractures. A recent trend in the treatment of these difficult injuries is the double fixation with a nail and a plate, a strategy that comes with advantages including faster weight-bearing and lower risk for non-union. Although biomechanical studies have demonstrated the superiority of nail-plate constructs, there is a paucity in the literature regarding the indications and results of treatment. A review of the literature to date was carried out to identify which group of patients would benefit the most from this type of reconstruction and to evaluate the clinical outcomes.     

What advantages does volar plate fixation have over K-wire fixation for distal radius extension fractures in the elderly?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) followed immediately by physiotherapy and of percutaneous K-wire-fixation and casting for unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients, considering the results both in general, for all such fractures, and selectively for A3 and C2 fractures. METHODS: Follow-up examinations were performed 26 (18-48) months after surgery in 43 patients (median age 67 (60-83) years) treated with K-wire fixation and 9 (5-17) months after surgery in 46 patients (median age 76 (60-90) years) treated with ORIF, and the outcome of each was recorded as Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Gartland-Werley and Castaing scores; the radiological loss of correction was also assessed. Statistical analysis was performed first without reference to the specific type of fracture for the K-wire- and the total ORIF -groups, and then selectively for A3 and C2 -fractures only; in the second analysis the patients were divided into three groups: KD, ORIF with and ORIF without angular stability. RESULTS: The Garland-Werley and Castaing scores do not indicate any significant difference between the procedures specified. According to the Garland-Werley score 37 patients (86%) treated by K-wire fixation and 39 (85%) treated by ORIF achieved "excellent" and "good" results; according to the Castaing score there were 33 (77%) "good" results after K-wire fixation and 34 (74%) good results after ORIF. The radiological loss of correction (K-wire fixation/ORIF) as measured by the radial inclination (median 2/2.5 degrees), the palmar tilt (median 3/5 degrees) and the radial shortening (median 1/1 degrees mm) do not differ significantly. Suboptimal radiological results do not always correlate with results that are only "fair" or "poor". The non-fracture-specific DASH score suggests a higher degree of patient satisfaction after K-wire fixation (7 [0-87] points) than after ORIF (17 [0-82] points), which is not confirmed by fracture-specific evaluation. There is a significantly earlier return to the "activities of daily living" (4 as against 8 weeks) after ORIF. CONCLUSION: All the treatments compared are suitable for the treatment of A3 and C2 fractures. The important advantages of ORIF are the early functional physiotherapy without casting and without obligatory second surgery and the earlier return to "activities of daily living", which are all of decisive importance for older patients, who are the ones most frequently affected.     

How safe is the operative treatment of Gartland type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children?

Whereas operative treatment of supracondylar fractures is now standard of care for Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children, the treatment of type 2 fractures remains somewhat controversial. The purpose of this article was to examine the safety and efficacy of closed reduction and pinning of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 189 type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures operatively treated at one tertiary care children's hospital from 2000 to 2006. Data were acquired from a review of radiographs and clinical notes. RESULTS: We found no intraoperative surgical or anesthetic complications in our series. None of our cases lost reduction after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. There were 4 pin tract infections (2.1%) in our series: 3 were treated with antibiotics, and 1 needed irrigation and debridement in the operating room. This was the only patient who required reoperation for any reason. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the largest reported series of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children, we found an extremely low rate of complications after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning; secondary operations were also uncommon (0.5%). Our series demonstrates a high probability of satisfactory outcome after operative treatment of type 2 supracondylar fractures compared with previous studies of children treated by closed reduction without pinning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level 4 (case series [no or historical control group]).     

The epidemic of ankle fractures in the elderly – is surgical treatment warranted?

Ankle fractures in the elderly are extremely common (up to 184 fractures per 100,000 persons per year, and of these approximately 20%–30% occur in the elderly). The medical literature contains no research that has investigated ankle fractures in the elderly. A prospective, randomised study was conducted of 84 patients with displaced ankle fractures, who were over the age of 65 years and were assigned to operative or conservative treatment after closed reduction. The results of treatment assessed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score showed a mean of 91.37 ± 8.96 in the non-operated group compared with 75.2 ± 14.38 (P = 0.001) in the operated group. The costs of treatment were accordingly higher. These results call for consideration of a non-operative approach to the treatment of well-reduced ankle fractures in the elderly. Increased efforts should be invested in the prevention of these common fractures.

---

---

Received: 29 November 1999     

Initial shortening and internal fixation in combination with a Sauvé-Kapandji procedure for severely comminuted fractures of the distal radius in elderly patients

We identified 11 women with a mean age of 74 years (65 to 81) who sustained comminuted distal radial and ulnar fractures and were treated by volar plating and slight shortening of the radius combined with a primary Sauvé-Kapandji procedure. At a mean of 46 months (16 to 58), union of distal radial fractures and arthrodesis of the distal radioulnar joint was seen in all patients. The mean shortening of the radius was 12 mm (5 to 18) compared to the contralateral side. Flexion and extension of the wrist was a mean of 54° and 50°, respectively, and the mean pronation and supination of the forearm was 82° and 86°, respectively. The final mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 26 points. According to the Green and O'Brien rating system, eight patients had an excellent, two a good and one a fair result. The good clinical and radiological results, and the minor complications without the need for further operations related to late ulnar-sided wrist pain, justify this procedure in the elderly patient.     

Is primary total elbow arthroplasty safe for the treatment of open intra-articular distal humerus fractures?

ObjectivesTotal elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a viable treatment for elderly patients with distal humerus fracture who frequently present with low-grade open fractures. This purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a protocol of serial irrigations and debridements (I&Ds) followed by primary TEA for the treatment of open intra-articular distal humerus fractures.MethodsSeven patients (mean 74 years; range 56–86 years) with open (two Grade I and five Grade 2) distal humerus fractures (OTA 13C) who were treated between 2001 and 2007 with a standard staged protocol that included TEA were studied. Baseline Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were obtained during the initial hospitalization, and the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were obtained at each follow-up visit.ResultsFollow-up averaged 43 (range 4–138) months. There were no wound complications and no deep infections. Complications included one case of heterotopic ossification with joint contracture, one olecranon fracture unrelated to the TEA, and two loose humeral stems. The average final ROM was from 21° (range 5–30°) to 113° flexion (range 90–130°). DASH scores averaged 25 at pre-injury baseline and 48 at the most recent follow-up visits.ConclusionsTEA has become a mainstream option for the treatment of distal humerus fractures which are on occasion open. There is hesitation in using arthroplasty in an open fracture setting due to a potential increased infection risk. The absence of any infectious complications and satisfactory functional outcomes observed in the current series indicates that TEA is a viable treatment modality for complex open fractures of the distal humerus.     

Distal humerus internal fixation: a biomechanical comparison of 90° and parallel constructs

The optimal plating configuration for open reduction and internal fixation of complex distal humerus fractures is controversial. We evaluated cyclic fatigue performance and biomechanical stiffness in a cadaveric model of distal humerus fractures: precontoured nonlocking parallel plates versus a 90° nonlocking construct. A paired design was used, and 8 matched pairs of cadaveric arms were evaluated for bone density and plated. An osteotomy gap was created to simulate comminution, and constructs were randomized to anteroposterior, mediolateral, and torsional stiffness testing. Finally, 350 N was applied cyclically until deformation was permanent, Although there was a trend toward more stiffness of the parallel construct in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and torsional testing, it was not significant (P>.05). Likewise, there was no significant difference in number of cycles to failure (P>.05). Given these results, we suggest that it is reasonable to use a 90° construct or a parallel construct for internal fixation of distal humerus fractures. However, our findings are consistent with a trend in the biomechanical literature supporting use of a parallel construct.