Long-term bromocriptine treatment of de novo patients with Parkinson''s disease. A seven-year follow-up

Thirty-nine de novo patients with Parkinson's disease were treated with bromocriptine alone and followed on average for 5.9 years. Fifteen of the 39 patients did not complete the first year of observation, 12 of them because of drug intolerance. The symptomatology was tolerated well by other 24 for the first 2 years treatment. During the third year of follow-up levodopa treatment had to be instituted because of loss of response to bromocriptine. The number of fluctuations in disability was smaller in the patients whose symptomatology was controlled by bromocriptine monotherapy than in those requiring levodopa, either alone or combined with bromocriptine.     

Combined bromocriptine-levodopa therapy early in Parkinson's disease

Compared with levodopa, treatment of parkinsonism for 3 years with bromocriptine alone resulted in less fluctuation and peak-dose dyskinesia, but also less improvement in parkinsonian disability. Only a few of the 76 patients had long-term benefit on chronic bromocriptine therapy. However, combined bromocriptine and levodopa therapy had a therapeutic response equal to that of levodopa alone, with fewer fluctuations and peak-dose dyskinesias. Treatment should begin with a low dose of levodopa and a dopamine agonist.     

Low-dose bromocriptine in the early phases of Parkinson's disease

The effect of bromocriptine at doses up to 20 mg/day was studied in a single-blind format with a placebo phase in 15 Parkinson's disease patients with mild-to-moderate disability who had not been previously treated with levodopa. For the 11 patients who completed the 9 month trial, both Northwestern University Disability Scale and Columbia University Rating Scale scores were significantly reduced during bromocriptine therapy, when compared with either baseline or placebo scores. Two patients improved greater than 50% and had no side effects. Transient side effects appeared in four patients. Bromocriptine at doses of 20 mg/day or below may yield effective symptomatic improvement in de novo parkinsonism and may be considered as the initial treatment in young parkinsonian patients with only mild-to-moderate disability.     

Early combination of bromocriptine and levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a 5-year follow-up

Compared with levodopa, long-term bromocriptine treatment of parkinsonian patients for 5 years resulted in fewer fluctuations of disability and peak-dose dyskinesias, but also less improvement in parkinsonian disability. Combination of low-dose bromocriptine and levodopa resulted in a therapeutic response equal to that of levodopa alone but with fewer end-of-dose disturbances and peak-dose dyskinesias. I believe that treatment should begin promptly with a low dose of levodopa, combined with a dopamine agonist such as bromocriptine.     

L-dopa, biperiden and sebum excretion in Parkinson disease

Sebum secretion was measured on the forehead of 47 patients with Parkinson's disease before and after treatment with anticholinergic (biperiden), levodopa + AAID and bromocriptine, by the osmic acid technique. Another 100 patients under biperiden, levodopa + AAID or association of both, for at least one year, were also evaluated. The male parkinsonian "de novo" patients have shown greater sebum secretion than female patients. It was also concluded that biperiden failed to reduce sebum secretion rate. On the other hand, it was found that L-dopa + AAID reduces the sebum secretion (CL = casual level and SER = sebum excretion rate) on both male and female patients. Bromocriptine (10mg/day) was the second dopaminergic therapy employed in the present work. Similarly to L-dopa, this dopaminergic agonist was able to significantly reduce sebum secretion (both CL and SER) of male patients. There was a positive and significant correlation for the 50-59 years old male patients "de novo" between CL and tremor, hypokinesia, gait and posture or functional incapacity, before treatment. After a period of treatment correlation was no more found. In relation to parkinsonians under chronic treatment was found a positive and significant correlation between sebum secretion and hypokinesia. The level of sebum secretion on parkinsonian "de novo" patients before treatment was equal to parkinsonian patients under chronic treatment regardless the treatment, except for greater than or equal to 60 years old parkinsonians who have shown CL and SER higher than "de novo" parkinsonian patients with the same age but without treatment. The treatment with L-dopa + AAID significantly decreased both CL and SER of "de novo" parkinsonian patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sustained-release Madopar HBS® compared with standard Madopar® in the long-term treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients

In this Danish-Norwegian randomized double-blind parallel-group multicentre study, we compared the therapeutic response of slow-release Madopar HBS® to standard Madopar® in 134 de novo patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease during a 5-year period. The drugs were dosed according to the individual need of the patients. The Webster, NUDS, UPDRS and Hoehn & Yahr scales were used for evaluation of symptoms. Addition of a morning dose of standard Madopar 62.5 mg was allowed after 6 months. Bromocriptine could be administered but not Selegiline. Sixty-five patients got Madopar HBS and 69 standard Madopar. Surprisingly, no differences were found as to the mean daily levodopa dose, the mean number of daily doses or the use of and doses of bromocriptine. Unexpectedly, we found a trend towards a more frequent use of a morning dose of standard Madopar in the group treated with the standard formulation. No differences were observed in the occurrence of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia, the incidence of which was relatively low. Sustained-release Madopar (HBS) thus proved to be as effective as standard Madopar in the long-term treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients, but the drug showed no advantage in postponing or reducing the long-term levodopa treatment problems.     

Differences in the motor response to apomorphine between untreated and fluctuating patients with Parkinson's disease.

Behavioral hyposensitivity to repeated apomorphine administration has been observed in fluctuating parkinsonian patients. To investigate whether a similar phenomenon occurs in patients never treated with levodopa, we studied the response to apomorphine in 20 de novo patients with Parkinson's disease. Six patients showed no or minimal improvement after apomorphine injections (maximal dose 3.5 mg). Fourteen patients responded and were then given up to four repeated subcutaneous injections of apomorphine [minimal effective dose (MED)]. The responses of de novo patients were compared with responses in 10 patients with motor fluctuations previously studied by the same protocol. There was no significant difference in latency and duration of motor responses after repeated apomorphine injections in de novo patients. MED was similar in de novo and fluctuating patients, but duration of improvement induced by each apomorphine bolus was longer in the de novo group. These results indicate that response duration to apomorphine is longer in previously untreated patients and that behavioral tolerance associated with pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation by apomorphine occurs mainly in patients with more advanced disease under chronic levodopa therapy.     

Bromocriptine and lisuride in Parkinson disease

Lisuride was compared with bromocriptine in 25 parkinsonian patients in whom the response to levodopa had diminished; 19 had “wearing off,” “on-off” phenomena, or both. At the time bromocriptine was added to levodopa, the mean age of the patients was 62.7 years and mean disease duration was 8.9 years. Disability decreased by 34% in the on period and by 20% in the off period, and the number of hours the patients were on increased from 9.6 to 12.8. All these changes were significant (p ≤ 0.01 to 0.05). Bromocriptine, however, had to be discontinued in 11 patients because of adverse effects. In the remaining 14 patients, bromocriptine was eventually discontinued because of decreased efficacy. Mean dose of bromocriptine was 55 mg (range, 20 to 100 mg). At the time lisuride was added to levodopa the patients were older (65.4 years), had had the disease longer (11.4 years), and were more disabled. Nonetheless, disability decreased in the on period by 33% and in the off period by 17%, and the number of hours the patients were on increased from 3.9 to 8.9. All these changes were significant (p ≤ 0.01 to 0.05). The mean dose of lisuride was 2.8 mg (range, 0.6 to 5.0 mg). Lisuride was discontinued in 8 patients because of adverse effects. Both bromocriptine and lisuride are useful in managing patients with advanced Parkinson disease whose response to levodopa has diminished. While it is presently not possible to state which of the drugs is more effective, ultimately their usage will probably be determined by their relative cost.     

Bromocriptine treatment in Parkinson's disease.

Thirty-one patients with Parkinson's disease were treated with the ergot alkaloid bromocriptine, a drug which stimulates dopamine receptors. Bromocriptine had a slight therapeutic effect in patients on no other treatment and an additional effect in patients on levodopa. The mean optimum dosage of bromocriptine, established over a 12 week period, was 26 mg daily. In 20 patients bromocriptine was compared with placebo in a double-blind controlled trial. Active treatment caused a significant (P less than 0.02) reduction in total disability and akinesia scores. The least disabled patients showed the greatest response. Side-effects of bromocriptine--nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, and abnormal involuntary movements--were similar to nature to those of levodopa. In most normal subjects, bromocriptine causes an increase in plasma growth hormone concentration. This was determined in 20 patients with Parkinson's disease after 1-15 mg bromocriptine. Only a single patient showed an obvious increase up to 120 minutes after dosage. Bromocriptine was not effective treatment in two patients who had not previously responded to levodopa and replacement of this drug by bromocriptine in patients with end-of-dose akinesia after chronic levodopa treatment did not totally abolish response swings.     

Comparison of lisuride and bromocriptine in the treatment of advanced Parkinson''s disease

Twenty patients with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease were studied, all having a deteriorating response to levodopa and suffering from daily fluctuations in disability. A double-blind randomized cross-over study was conducted. Basic levodopa and anticholinergic treatment was continued unchanged in all patients. The dose increment period of 4-8 weeks was followed by a 4 week treatment period on a fixed optimal dose. In both treatment groups the mean optimal daily dose of lisuride was 1.3 mg (range 0.2-2.4 mg) and that of bromocriptine about 15 mg (range 3.75-30.0), without any significant differences between the treatment groups. The addition of lisuride or bromocriptine to levodopa treatment resulted in a significant and equal further improvement of parkinsonian disability. The therapeutic profiles of both lisuride and bromocriptine were similar. There was significantly more improvement in tremor than in other parkinsonian symptoms. Both lisuride and bromocriptine elicited a significant improvement in fluctuations of disability. No significant differences between the treatments were observed. The occurrence of clinical side effects seemed to be similar with both treatment regimens. In advanced parkinsonian patients the therapeutic efficacy of lisuride seems to be equal to that of bromocriptine as far as parkinsonian disability and fluctuations in disability are concerned.     

Diurnal motor variations to repeated doses of levodopa in Parkinson's disease

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in long-term levodopa therapy often complain of worsening of motor symptoms in the afternoon and evening. The pathophysiology of this phenomenon is not known. We evaluated the motor response to repeated doses of levodopa during a 12-hour period in 52 parkinsonian patients (19 de novo, 20 stable, and 13 wearing-off). On the day of the study, all patients received standard doses of levodopa/carbidopa at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 noon, and 4:00 p.m. Motor measurements such as tapping test, walking time, and tremor score, and blood samples for levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa (3OMD) plasma analysis, were performed hourly. Mean motor scores and pharmacokinetic data, evaluated for a period of 3 hours after each levodopa dose, were compared. In de novo patients, we did not observe diurnal changes in motor score, whereas a progressive daytime worsening was visible in stable and wearing-off patients. No significant difference in levodopa pharmacokinetics after each levodopa dose was observed within each patient group, whereas 3OMD plasma levels significant increased with repeated levodopa administrations. However, no significant correlation between motor scores and 3OMD plasma levels was observed, suggesting that the diminishing motor response to afternoon and evening doses of levodopa in patients in long-term levodopa therapy does not relate to the pharmacokinetics of the drug. It is possible that this phenomenon may be an expression of the occurrence of tolerance to repeated doses of levodopa.     

A randomised controlled study of bromocriptine versus levodopa in previously untreated Parkinsonian patients: a 3 year follow-up.

The long term effects of a de novo treatment with levodopa versus bromocriptine were compared in respectively 13 and 15 previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease in a prospective randomised trial. Thirteen patients were treated with levodopa alone (mean dose 444, SEM 63 mg daily) whereas 15 others received bromocriptine alone (mean dose 50, SEM 6 mg daily) during 37, SEM 4 and 32, SEM 4 months respectively. For a similar decrease in the Columbia rating scale, the nature of long term side effects was different in the two groups: three patients on levodopa developed peak-dose dyskinesias and one other dystonia. With bromocriptine, one patient developed a severe psychosis whereas 3 others suffered from primary lack of efficacy (1 case) or late decrease in efficacy (2 cases). These results demonstrate the potential of D2 dopamine agonists (like bromocriptine) in the de novo treatment of Parkinson's disease; however, their use is limited by their lack of efficacy and/or the occurrence of neuropsychiatric side effects.     

Lisuride, a dopamine agonist in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease

A randomized, prospective trial in 90 de novo parkinsonian patients showed that 4 years' treatment with lisuride resulted in significantly fewer end-of-dose disturbances and peak-dose dyskinesias, but also less improvement in parkinsonian disability, than with levodopa. Early combination of lisuride and a low dose of levodopa, during a 4-year follow-up, resulted in a therapeutic response equal to that achieved with high-dose levodopa alone, but significantly fewer end-of-dose failures and dyskinesias. Thus it seems advisable that treatment should begin in the early phase of the disease with a dopamine agonist such as lisuride combined with a low dose of levodopa.     

Treatment of Parkinson's disease with 8-alpha-amino-ergoline, CU 32-085

8-alpha-amino-ergoline (CU 32-085) is a dopamine receptor agonist that should have fewer side effects than most other dopamine agonists. We studied the effect of this drug in 19 parkinsonian patients. In untreated or levodopa-treated patients, there was considerable improvement of akinesia, rigidity, and tremor; on-off symptoms also improved in the levodopa-treated patients. In patients pretreated with levodopa/bromocriptine, about half the dose of CU 32-085 was necessary to obtain the same therapeutic results, but there was no further improvement of on-off symptoms. Side effects were less pronounced than with bromocriptine; no circulatory disturbances and no psychotic episodes were observed.     

Treatment of Parkinson's disease: Problems with a progressing disease

Summary Long-term follow-up of parkinsonian patients has shown that although levodopa treatment significantly improves the parkinsonian symptoms and the quality of life of parkinsonian patients for several years, various distressing difficulties arise during chronic levodopa treatment, such as the loss of benefit, dyskinesias, on-off phenomena, postural instability and dementia. Clinical, neuropsychological, mortality and post-mortem brain studies indicate that levodopa as a replacement therapy does not modify the progression of the underlying pathology and the natural course of the disease. It seems that levodopa has only a limited period of optimal usefulness in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. However, at present there is no better or more potent therapeutic agent available than levodopa and it is still the primary treatment of Parkinson's disease. It would be reasonable not to begin levodopa treatment in patients with mild symptoms but to withold levodopa until the severity of symptoms really makes its use necessary. Thus it is possible to get the maximal long functional benefit.Post-mortem brain studies have shown that in Parkinson's disease there is not only a progressive loss of dopaminergic substantia nigra neurons but there are also significant changes in the striatal dopamine receptors. In some patients a denervation supersensitivity seems to develop and in some others a loss of dopamine receptors in the striatum. However, in advanced parkinsonian patients with a deteriorating response to levodopa, there seem to be still enough dopamine receptors in the striatum for drugs stimulating the dopamine receptors directly to improve the parkinsonian disability. Indeed, recent evidence indicates that dopaminergic agonists, such as bromocriptine, seem to be a significant and valuable adjuvant therapy to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with a deteriorating response and/or the on-off phenomena. Although bromocriptine is not completely satisfactory, it is a significant opening to a new mode of treatment. In the future it will be very important to develop more potent and selective dopaminergic agonists affecting only those striatal receptors which are mainly responsible for the parkinsonian symptoms. Then a better therapeutic response is likely to occur and many central side effects can be avoided.Current difficulties in the management of Parkinson's disease greatly depend on the fact that we are dealing with a symptomatic therapy. It is hoped that future research will soon lead to a discovery of the primary cause and consequently to a causal therapy of Parkinson's disease.     

No effect of chronic bromocriptine therapy on levodopa pharmacokinetics in patients with Parkinson's disease.

We studied the effect of chronic bromocriptine cotherapy on levodopa kinetics in seven patients with Parkinson's disease who were receiving levodopa therapy. Plasma levodopa concentrations were measured after a standard oral levodopa fasting dose over a 5-hour period, on two different sessions, without and with bromocriptine at a fixed daily dose of 15 mg. We found no statistically significant difference in the rate and extent of levodopa absorption between the two treatments, with minimal intrasubject variability. Our observations suggest that chronic bromocriptine cotherapy is unlikely to affect the plasma levodopa pharmacokinetics under standardized intake conditions or to contribute to a less predictable pattern of drug plasma concentrations.     

Effect of long-term therapy on the pharmacodynamics of levodopa. Relation to on-off phenomenon.

To determine how the response to levodopa is altered by long-term therapy, we examined the dose response to 2-hour infusions of levodopa in three groups of parkinsonian patients: those who were previously untreated, those who exhibited stable responses, and those who exhibited fluctuating responses to levodopa therapy, using tapping speed as an index of bradykinesia. The baseline tapping speed was greater in the patients with stable responses than in the untreated patients, probably representing a "long-duration response" to levodopa therapy. A "short-duration response," indicated by an increase in tapping speed lasting hours, was observed in most patients in all groups. The onset of the short-duration effect was more rapid and the incremental increase in tapping speed was twice as large in the patients with fluctuating responses compared with the untreated patients and patients with stable responses. The duration of the short-duration effect was greatest in the untreated group but did not differ between the groups with stable and fluctuating responses. Dyskinesia was not observed in any of the de novo patients but was observed in three of 12 patients with stable responses and eight of nine patients with fluctuating responses to levodopa therapy. Dyskinesia appeared before or with the antiparkinsonian effects in patients with stable responses, giving no indication of a higher threshold for dyskinesia in these patients compared with those with fluctuating responses. The plasma half-life clearance, volume of distribution, and maximum plasma concentrations of levodopa did not differ among groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Does combined levodopa and bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson's disease prevent late motor complications?

Levodopa-carbidopa (LD) in low dosages adequately controls symptoms in most patients with Parkinson's disease and delays the appearance of fluctuations and dyskinesias. It has been suggested that early combination therapy with bromocriptine and levodopa delays or prevents the onset of late treatment complication associated with LD monotherapy in Parkinson's disease. We have conducted this study to assess the possible benefit of combined therapy compared with levodopa monotherapy. Seventy-eight previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited over a period of 54 months and randomly allocated to either a levodopa-carbidopa (LD) Group or a levodopa-carbidopa in combination with low-dose bromocriptine (LD-Br) Group. The appearance of motor complications determined the end point of the study. We gradually increased the doses of bromocriptine (2.5–15 mg/d) or levodopa (125–500 mg/d) until the maximum "on" time was reached. In six patients, the doses of levodopa had to be increased up to the optimal dose (625–1000 mg/day). In the last evaluation the on-time and parkinsonian disability were similar in both treatment groups. We did not find statistically significant differences in the frequency of motor complications when comparing the two groups of treatment. Our study suggests that early combination of levodopa and bromocriptine does not confer any clinical benefit over levodopa alone in treating early Parkinson's disease, nor will it influence the evolution of the disease.     

Low dose bromocriptine-induced pleural effusion and pleuropulmonary fibrosis

We describe a parkinsonian patient who developed a slight asymptomatic pleural effusion during prolonged therapy with low dose bromocriptine (BCR) in addition to levodopa, following prior treatment with CQA 206–291. A moderate increase of BCR dosage prompted a severe pleuropulmonary inflammatory reaction with polyclonal activation and elevated serum liver enzymes, which normalized following withdrawal of the drug. The clinical syndrome and close relation to BCR treatment are in keeping with a diagnosis of BCR-related pleuropulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Features of this case are compared with previous reports on dopamine (DA) agonist-related PPF. This case supports earlier suggestions of polyclonal activation in DA agonist-related PPF and suggests hepatic involvement and dose dependency.     

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.