Dental implants inserted in male versus female patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in the failure rates, marginal bone loss (MBL) and post‐operative infection for implants inserted in male or female patients, against the alternative hypothesis of a difference. An electronic search without time or language restrictions was undertaken in December 2014. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies, either randomized or not. Ninety‐one publications were included, with a total of 27 203 implants inserted in men (1185 failures), and 25 154 implants inserted in women (1039 failures). The results suggest that the insertion of dental implants in male patients statistically affected the implant failure rates (RR 1·21, 95% CI 1·07–1·37, P = 0·002). Due to the limited number of studies reporting results on MBL, it is difficult to estimate the real effect of the insertion of implants in different sexes on the marginal bone level. Due to lack of satisfactory information, meta‐analysis for the outcome ‘post‐operative infection’ was not performed. The results have to be interpreted with caution due to the presence of several confounding factors in the included studies.     

The efficacy of non‐narcotic analgesics on post‐operative endodontic pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The objective of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of non‐narcotic analgesics including non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or paracetamol in the treatment of post‐operative endodontic pain. Additionally, we aimed to examine the possible association of study covariates on the pain scores using meta‐regression analysis. An electronic search was performed in 2016. After data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies (n = 27, representing 2188 patients), meta‐analysis was performed using a random‐effect inverse variance method. Meta‐regression analysis was conducted to examine the associations between effect sizes and study‐level covariates (P < 0·05). The results showed that administration of non‐narcotic analgesic was more effective than placebo in the management of post‐operative pain, resulting in a lower pain scores with a standardised mean difference of ?0·50 (95% CI= ?0·70, ?0·30), ?0·76 (95%CI= ?0·95, ?0·56), ?1·15 (95% CI= ?1·52, ?0·78), ?0·65 (95% CI= ?1·05, ?0·26) for immediately after the procedure, 6?, 12? and 24 h post?operative follow‐ups (test for statistical heterogeneity: P = 0·000, P = 0·000, P = 0·000 and P = 0·001), respectively. Our meta‐regression analysis provided the evidence for association between some study covariates with treatment effect, each at different follow‐ups. We concluded that the clinicians can manage post‐operative endodontic pain by administration of NSAIDs and/or paracetamol. However, analgesic regimens should be considered as important determinants when prescribing a pharmacological adjuvant.     

Influence of supracrestal tissue attachment thickness on radiographic bone level around dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The present systematic review and meta‐analysis was carried out to determine the extent to which supracrestal tissue attachment (STA) thickness affects marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and complementary sources covering the period up to June 2018. The studies were meta‐analyzed based on implant position with respect to the alveolar bone crest (crestal/supracrestal). The MBL values were categorized according to STA width (thick/thin). Of the 1062 eligible titles, nine articles were included in the review. The implants were positioned crestal or supracrestal with respect to the alveolar ridge. The difference between (thin/thick) STA was statistically significant among analytical subsets in terms of lesser MBL (crestal‐positioned: weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.52, 95% CI [0.03‐1.01]; P = 0.036; supracrestal‐positioned: WMD = 1.26; 95% CI [1.12‐1.39]; P = 0.00; pooled analysis: WMD = 0.73; 95% CI [0.033‐1.13]; P < 0.01). Implant positioning and patient age showed statistical significance in the meta‐regression analysis. The heterogeneity explained by age was R² = 39.8%. Despite its limitations, the present study demonstrates that implants with thin STA result in greater MBL. There is moderate certainty of the evidence for a large effect of MBL prevention “in favor” of a thick STA environment in crestal‐positioned implants and the pooled analysis, but lesser certainty when only supracrestal‐positioned implants are considered. No trials studying this topic in subcrestal‐positioned implants were found.     

Prophylactic antibiotic regimen and dental implant failure: a meta‐analysis

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to investigate whether there are any positive effects of prophylactic antibiotic regimen on implant failure rates and post‐operative infection when performing dental implant treatment in healthy individuals. An electronic search without time or language restrictions was undertaken in March 2014. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies, either randomised or not. The search strategy resulted in 14 publications. The I² statistic was used to express the percentage of the total variation across studies due to heterogeneity. The inverse variance method was used with a fixed‐ or random‐effects model, depending on the heterogeneity. The estimates of relative effect were expressed in risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval. Six studies were judged to be at high risk of bias, whereas one study was considered at moderate risk, and six studies were considered at low risk of bias. The test for overall effect showed that the difference between the procedures (use versus non‐use of antibiotics) significantly affected the implant failure rates (P = 0·0002), with a RR of 0·55 (95% CI 0·41–0·75). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one patient having an implant failure was 50 (95% CI 33–100). There were no apparent significant effects of prophylactic antibiotics on the occurrence of post‐operative infections in healthy patients receiving implants (P = 0·520). A sensitivity analysis did not reveal difference when studies judged as having high risk of bias were not considered. The results have to be interpreted with caution due to the presence of several confounding factors in the included studies.     

A comparative study of the Osstell™ versus the Osstell Mentor™ to evaluate implant stability in human cadaver mandibles

The aim of this study was to assess the primary stability of dental implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell? and Osstell Mentor? devices and to investigate the reproducibility and comparability of the results obtained with these devices. Twenty‐four Straumann implants (Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) were placed in the anterior mandible of 12 fresh edentulous human cadaver mandibles. The implant stability quotients (ISQs) were measured with the Osstell? and Osstell Mentor? when implants were inserted at 50% of their length and following their complete insertion. The Osstell? device measured lower scores compared with the Osstell Mentor?. This was significant for the full position (mean difference = 9·9), t (11) = 7·4, P < 0·001 and for the halfway position (mean difference = 5·9), t (11) = 2·41, P = 0·03. In con‐clusion, the Osstell? produced relatively lower ISQ scores than the Osstell Mentor?.     

Narrow‐ and regular‐diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3‐year split‐mouth randomized clinical trial

Objectives

The objective of this 3‐year split‐mouth randomized controlled clinical study was to compare narrow‐diameter implants (NDIs) to regular‐diameter implants (RDIs) in the posterior region of the jaws (premolars and molars) in regards to (i) the marginal bone level (MBL) and (ii) implant and prosthesis survival and success rates.

Material and Methods

A total of 22 patients were included in the study. Each patient received at least one implant of each diameter (Ø3.3 and Ø4.1 mm), placed either in the maxilla or mandible to support single crowns. A total 44 implants (22 NDIs and 22 RDIs) were placed and included in the study. Twenty‐one implants were placed in the premolar, whereas 23 were placed in molar areas. Radiographic evaluations to access the MBL were performed immediately after implant placement, 1 and 3 years after implant loading. Peri‐implant clinical variables including probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) were obtained after crown delivery, 1 and 3 years after loading. Furthermore, the survival and success rates of the implants and prosthesis were also evaluated.

Results

Twenty patients were able to complete the study. There was no statistically significant difference regarding MBL between groups at implant placement (p = .084), 1‐year (p = .794) and 3‐year (p = .598) time intervals. The mean peri‐implant bone loss at 3‐year follow‐up was ?0.58 ± 0.39 mm (95% CI: ?0.751 to ?0.409) and ?0.53 ± 0.46 mm (95% CI: ?0.731 to ?0.329) for NDIs and RDIs, respectively. BoP was present at 15% and 10% of NDIs and RDIs, respectively, at 3‐year follow‐up. PPD >5 mm was observed in 5% and 0% of the implants of NDIs and RDIs, respectively, at 3‐year follow‐up. At the 3‐year examination, the implant success rates were in the NDIs and RDIs sites, respectively, 95% and 100%. The corresponding values for prosthesis success rates were 90% for NDIs and 95% for RDIs.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that NDIs placed to support single crowns in the posterior region did not differ to RDIs in regards to MBL, implant survival, and success rates.     

Comparison of molar intrusion efficiency and bone density by CT in patients with different vertical facial morphology

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between molar intrusion efficiency and bone density in patients with different vertical facial morphology. Thirty‐six female patients, with overerupted upper first molars, were divided into two groups according to mandiblular plane angle (FH‐MP): hyperdivergent, FH‐MP>30° (G1), hypodivergent, FH‐MP<22° (G2). Mini‐screw implants with elastic chains were used to intrude upper first molars. Spiral CT was used to measure the intrusion degree of upper first molar and bone density, and molar intrusion efficiency was calculated as amount/duration (mm month^?1). In addition, each tooth was divided into three portions (cervical, furcation and apical) to measure the bone density. It was found in this study that treatment duration was 3·13 and 4·71 months in G1 and G2 and that the intrusion efficiency was 1·57 and 0·81 in G1 and G2 with significant difference (P < 0·05). There were significant differences in cervical, furcation and apical bone density between two groups (P < 0·05). The bone density was significantly reduced after molar intrusion. In addition, the bone density change was greater in G1 than in G2 (P < 0·05). It was concluded that molars were more easily to be intruded in hyperdivergent than in hypodivergent patients. The difference of bone density and bone density changes during intrusion may account for the variation of molar intrusion efficiency.     

The Effect of Flapless Surgery on Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Level: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background: The clinical outcomes of implants placed using the flapless approach have not yet been systematically investigated. Hence, the present systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to study the effect of the flapless technique on implant survival rates (SRs) and marginal bone levels (MBLs) compared with the conventional flap approach. Methods: An electronic search of five databases (from 1990 to March 2013), including PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, and a hand search of peer‐reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed. Human clinical trials with data on comparison of SR and changes in MBL between the flapless and conventional flap procedures, with at least five implants in each study group and a follow‐up period of at least 6 months, were included. Results: Twelve studies, including seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one cohort study, one pilot study, and three retrospective case‐controlled trials (CCTs), were included. The SR of each study was recorded, weighted mean difference (WMD) and confidence interval (CI) were calculated, and meta‐analyses were performed for changes in MBL. The average SR is 97.0% (range, 90% to 100%) for the flapless procedure and 98.6% (range, 91.67% to 100%) for the flap procedure. Meta‐analysis for the comparison of SR among selected studies presented a similar outcome (risk ratio = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.01, P = 0.30) for both interventions. Mean differences of MBL were retrieved from five RCTs and two retrospective CCTs and subsequently pooled into meta‐analyses; however, none of the comparisons showed statistical significance. For RCTs, the WMD was 0.07, with a 95% CI of ?0.05 to 0.20 (P = 0.26). For retrospective CCTs, the WMD was 0.23, with a 95% CI of ?0.58 to 1.05 (P = 0.58). For the combined analysis, the WMD was 0.03, with a 95% CI of ?0.11 to 0.18 (P = 0.67). The comparison of SR presented a low to moderate heterogeneity, but MBL presented a considerable heterogeneity among studies. Conclusion: This systematic review revealed that the SRs and radiographic marginal bone loss of flapless intervention were comparable with the flap surgery approach.     

Efficacy of low‐level laser therapy in the treatment of TMDs: a meta‐analysis of 14 randomised controlled trials

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of low‐level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). We searched electronic databases and references lists of relevant articles, retrieved all of the published randomised controlled trials in regard to these issues and then performed a meta‐analysis. Fourteen highly qualified RCTs reporting on a total of 454 patients, which evaluated the effectiveness of LLLT for patients suffering from TMDs were retrieved. The results indicated that LLLT was not better than placebo in reducing chronic TMD pain (weighted mean difference = ?19·39; 95% confidence interval = ?40·80–2·03; P < 0·00001; I² = 99%). However, the LLLT provided significant better functional outcomes in terms of maximum active vertical opening (MAVO) (weighted mean difference = 4·18; 95% confidence interval = 0·73–7·63; P = 0·006; I² = 73%), maximum passive vertical opening (MPVO) (weighted mean difference = 6·73; 95% confidence interval = 01·34–12·13; P = 0·06; I² = 73%), protrusion excursion (PE) (weighted mean difference = 1·81; 95% confidence interval = 0·79–2·83; P = 0·59; I² = 0%) and right lateral excursion (RLE) (weighted mean difference = 2·86; 95% confidence interval = 1·27–4·45; P = 0·01; I² = 73%). The results of our meta‐analysis have provided the best evidence on the efficacy of LLLT in the treatment of TMDs. This study indicates that using LLLT has limited efficacy in reducing pain in patients with TMDs. However, LLLT can significantly improve the functional outcomes of patients with TMDs.     

Effect of the Timing of Restoration on Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review

Background: The advancement in implant dentistry has allowed shortened treatment time by restoring the implants earlier. Whether the timing of restoration has an impact on implant marginal bone level has not been systematically analyzed. The aim of this study is to compare marginal bone loss (MBL) between implants that were restored with the following protocols: 1) immediate restoration/loading (IR/L); 2) early loading (EL); and 3) conventional loading (CL). Methods: An electronic literature search from three databases (until November 2011) and a hand search in implant‐related journals were conducted. Clinical human studies in English language that had reported a comparison of MBL between implants with IR/L, EL, or CL with ≥12‐month follow‐up were included. In addition, the minimal number of implants had to be 10 for each group. Implants with both immediate placement (IP) and delayed placement (DP) were included and analyzed separately. An assessment of the publication bias for the included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. Results: The initial search resulted in 1,640 articles, of which 27 articles in full text were further evaluated for eligibility. Finally, 11 studies (eight RCTs, two controlled clinical trials, and one retrospective study) were qualified and classified into four groups: 1) IR/L + DP versus CL + DP (n = 6 articles); 2) IR + DP versus EL + DP (n = 2 articles); 3) EL + DP versus CL + DP (n = 1 article); and (4) IL + IP versus CL + IP (n = 2 articles). A meta‐analysis performed for group 1 showed 0.09 mm (95% confidence interval = ?0.27 to 0.09 mm) difference in the mean MBL, favoring the IR/L protocol but without significant difference (P = 0.33). No significant difference in MBL was found for groups 2 through 4 after adjusting for the implant placement level. The eight RCTs were determined to be at moderate‐to‐high risk of publication bias. Conclusions: This meta‐analysis does not show an effect of the timing of restorations on implant MBL. The selection of restoration protocols should be based on factors other than MBL.     

Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Peri‐Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background: Multiple variables have been shown to affect early marginal bone loss (MBL). Among them, the location of the microgap with respect to the alveolar bone crest, occlusion, and use of a polished collar have traditionally been investigated as major contributory factors for this early remodeling. Recently, soft tissue thickness has also been investigated as a possible factor influencing this phenomenon. Hence, this study aims to further evaluate the influence of soft tissue thickness on early MBL around dental implants. Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to May 2015 reporting soft tissue thickness at time of implant placement and MBL with ≥12‐month follow‐up. In addition, random effects meta‐analyses of selected studies were applied to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) of MBL between groups of thick and thin peri‐implant soft tissue. Metaregression was conducted to investigate any potential influences of confounding factors, i.e., platform switching design, cement‐/screw‐retained restoration, and flapped/flapless surgical techniques. Results: Eight articles were included in the systematic review, and five were included in the quantitative synthesis and meta‐analyzed to examine the influence of tissue thickness on early MBL. Meta‐analysis for the comparison of MBL among selected studies showed a WMD of ?0.80 mm (95% confidence interval ?1.18 to ?0.42 mm) (P <0.0001), favoring the thick tissue group. Metaregression of the selected studies failed to demonstrate an association among MBL and confounding factors. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that implants placed with an initially thicker peri‐implant soft tissue have less radiographic MBL in the short term.     

Transcranial direct current stimulation and exercises for treatment of chronic temporomandibular disorders: a blind randomised‐controlled trial

To evaluate the effect of adding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to exercises for chronic pain, dysfunction and quality of life in subjects with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Participants were selected based on the RDC/TMD criteria and assessed for pain intensity, pressure pain threshold over temporomandibular joint and cervical muscles and quality of life. After initial assessment, all individuals underwent a 4‐week protocol of exercises and manual therapy, together with active or sham primary motor cortex tDCS. Stimulation was delivered through sponge electrodes, with 2 mA amplitude, for 20 min daily, over the first 5 days of the trial. A total of 32 subjects (mean age 24·7 ± 6·8 years) participated in the evaluations and treatment protocol. Mean pain intensity pre‐treatment was 5·5 ± 1·4 for active tDCS group, and 6·3 ± 1·2 for sham tDCS. Both groups showed a decrease in pain intensity scores during the trial period (time factor – F_4·5,137·5 = 28·7, P < 0·001; group factor – F_1·0,30·0 = 7·7, P < 0·05). However, there were no differences between the groups regarding change in pain intensity (time*group interaction – F_4·5,137·5 = 1·5, P = 0·137). This result remained the same after 5 months (t‐test t = 0·29, P > 0·05). Pressure pain thresholds decrease and improvement in quality of life were also noticeable in both groups, but again without significant differences between them. Absolute benefit increase was 37·5% (CI 95%: ?15·9% to 90·9%), and number needed to treat was 2·66. This study suggests that there is no additional benefit in adding tDCS to exercises for the treatment of chronic TMD in young adults.     

Occlusal tooth wear in Chinese adults with shortened dental arches

To assess associations between occlusal tooth wear and shortened dental arches (SDA) in Chinese 40 years and older subjects. From a sample of 1462 urban and rural adults, those presenting with SDA (n = 150) were compared with a control group of 65 randomly selected subjects with complete dentitions (CDA). Occlusal wear was assessed using a modified Smith and Knight index – the occlusal tooth wear index (OWTI) – and analysed using multivariate (logistic) regression. There was no significant effect from SDA on severe occlusal wear (OTWI score 3 or 4: OR = 2·016; 95% CI = 0·960–4·231; P = 0·064). Higher age was associated with severe occlusal wear (P values ≤0·007) and with higher mean OTWI scores; urban had less often severe occlusal wear than rural residents (OR = 0·519; P = 0·008). Higher mean OTWI scores were associated with rural residents, except for anterior teeth. Females had lower mean OTWI score for anterior teeth (effect = ?0·153; P = 0·030). Premolars in SDA had higher mean OTWI scores compared with those in CDA (effect = +0·213; P = 0·006). In SDA, more posterior occluding pairs (POPs) were associated with lower mean OTWI sores for anterior teeth (effect: ?0·158; P = 0·008) and higher scores for molars (effect: +0·249, P = 0·003). Subjects with SDA or CDA presented comparable occlusal wear, but premolars in SDA tend to have higher probability for having occlusal wear. Fewer numbers of POPs were associated with more wear in anterior teeth.     

The effect of oral appliances that advanced the mandible forward and limited mouth opening in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials

Oral appliances (OAs) have demonstrated efficacy in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but many different OA devices are available. The Japanese Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine supported the use of OAs that advanced the mandible forward and limited mouth opening and suggested an evaluation of their effects in comparison with untreated or CPAP. A systematic search was undertaken in 16 April 2012. The outcome measures of interest were as follows: Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), lowest SpO₂, arousal index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the SF‐36 Health Survey. We performed this meta‐analysis using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Five studies remained eligible after applying the exclusion criteria. Comparing OA and control appliance, OA significantly reduced the weighted mean difference (WMD) in both AHI and the arousal index (favouring OA, AHI: ?7·05 events h^?1; 95% CI, ?12·07 to ?2·03; P = 0·006, arousal index: ?6·95 events h^?1; 95% CI, ?11·75 to ?2·15; P = 0·005). OAs were significantly less effective at reducing the WMD in AHI and improving lowest SpO₂ and SF‐36 than CPAP, (favouring OA, AHI: 6·11 events h^?1; 95% CI, 3·24 to 8·98; P = 0·0001, lowest SpO₂: ?2·52%; 95% CI, ?4·81 to ?0·23; P = 0·03, SF‐36: ?1·80; 95% CI, ?3·17 to ?042; P = 0·01). Apnea Hypopnea Index and arousal index were significantly improved by OA relative to the untreated disease. Apnea Hypopnea Index, lowest SpO₂ and SF‐36 were significantly better with CPAP than with OA. The results of this study suggested that OAs improve OSA compared with untreated. CPAP appears to be more effective in improving OSA than OAs.     

Immediate loading short implants inserted on low bone quantity for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla using an All‐on‐4 design

More studies evaluating the outcome of short‐length dental implants in immediate loading are needed. To evaluate the use of short‐length tapered implants in immediate loading for complete edentulous maxillae rehabilitations using an All‐on‐4 design. This retrospective clinical study included a cohort of 43 patients with 172 implants (74 short‐length implants) inserted in low bone quantity. The patients were followed between 4 months and 6 years (average = 3 years). Outcome measures were implant survival, marginal bone remodelling, biological and mechanical complications. Two patients with four short‐length implants were lost to follow‐up during the first year. Three short and three long implants failed in four patients, rendering an overall cumulative survival rate implant and patient level, respectively, of 95·7% and 95·1% for short implants, 100% for regular implants and 96·6% and 95·2% for long implants. The average marginal bone remodelling at 1 and 3 years was 0·97 and 1·25 mm for the short implants, 0·82 and 0·87 mm for regular implants and 0·87 and 0·98 mm for long implants. Three patients presented 4 short‐length implants with peri‐implant pockets (3 implants in 2 patients were pseudo‐pockets). Mechanical complications were registered in 13 patients (7 provisional prostheses fractures and 6 abutment screw loosening). All complications were treated successfully. Within the limitations of this clinical study, the short‐term outcome of fixed prosthetic complete edentulous maxillae rehabilitations supported by short‐length implants inserted in low bone quantity areas is viable. Long‐term clinical studies are necessary for evaluating the outcome of these implants.     

Oral health and caries related microflora in children during the first three months following renal transplantation

There is little information on the oral health of children undergoing renal transplantation during the early transplant period. Methods. Twenty‐four children undergoing renal transplantation aged 4–13·2 years and their matched controls were recruited. The dmfs, dmft, DMFS and DMFT, plaque, gingivitis and gingival enlargement scores were recorded. The oral microflora was sampled and cultured for S. mutans, Lactobacllus species and Candida species. Results. There was a significantly lower mean dmfs (0·3 ± 0·9; P = 0·03), dmft (0·3 ± 0·9; P = 0·03), DMFS (2·3 ± 5·3; P = 0·01) and DMFT (1·5 ± 2·6; P = 0·02), respectively, in the transplant group. There was a significantly greater mean plaque score (14·7 ± 11) for the permanent dentition, at baseline only, compared with 90 days post‐transplantation (9·4 ± 10·4; P = 0·02). There was a significantly greater gingival enlargement score (1·8 ± 1·4; P = 0·04) 90 days post‐transplantation compared with baseline. The S. mutans and Lactobacillus counts were significantly lower both at baseline (P = 0·0001 and P = 0·004) and 90 days post‐transplantation (P = 0·02; and P = 0·05), respectively, compared with the controls. Conclusions. The transplant children had less active dental disease than the controls although gingival enlargement needs careful monitoring.     

Graft‐Free Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to investigate survival rates of dental implants placed simultaneously with graft‐free maxillary sinus floor elevation (GFSFE). Factors influencing amount of vertical bone gain (VBG), protruded implant length (PIL) in sinus at follow‐up (PILf), and peri‐implant marginal bone loss (MBL) are also evaluated. Methods: Electronic and manual searches for human clinical studies on simultaneous implant placement and GFSFE using the lateral window or transcrestal approach, published in the English language from January 1976 to March 2016, were conducted. The random‐effects model and mixed‐effect meta‐regression were used to analyze weighted mean values of clinical parameters and evaluate factors that influenced amount of VBG. Results: Of 740 studies, 22 clinical studies were included in this systematic review. A total of 864 implants were placed simultaneously with GFSFE at edentulous sites having mean residual bone height of 5.7 ± 1.7 mm. Mean implant survival rate (ISR) was 97.9% ± 0.02% (range: 93.5% to 100%). Weighted mean MBL was 0.91 ± 0.11 mm, and it was significantly associated with the postoperative follow‐up period (r = 0.02; R² = 43.75%). Weighted mean VBG was 3.8 ± 0.34 mm, and this parameter was affected significantly by surgical approach, implant length, and PIL immediately after surgery (PILi) (r = 2.82, 0.57, 0.80; R² = 19.10%, 39.27%, 83.92%, respectively). Weighted mean PILf was 1.26 ± 0.33 mm (range: 0.3 to 2.1 mm). Conclusion: Within limitations of the present systematic review, GFSFE with simultaneous implant placement can achieve satisfactory mean ISR of 97.9% ± 0.02%.     

A Retrospective Comparison of Oxidized and Turned Implants with Respect to Implant Survival,Marginal Bone Level and Peri‐Implant Soft Tissue Conditions after at Least 5 Years in Function

Background: Long‐term clinical follow‐up studies comparing different implant surfaces with regard to survival and marginal conditions are rare. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical performance of turned and oxidized implants after more than 5 years of loading Material and Methods: One hundred three patients (43 men, 60 women; mean age 67.4 years, range 32–90) previously treated with 287 implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), 133 with turned surface (MKIII, Nobel Biocare AB) and 154 with an oxidized surface (MKIII, TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB) were examined after at least 5 years of loading (mean 82 months, range 60–93 months). The implants had been used for support of single crowns (33 patients/36 implants), partial bridges (39 patients/103 implants), or full bridges (31 patients/148 implants) following an early loading protocol (14 patients /54 implants), a one‐stage protocol (32 patients/59 implants) or a two‐stage protocol (57 patients/174 implants). Clinical examinations of bleeding on probing (BoP) and pocket depth (PD) were performed. Intraoral radiographs were used for assessments of marginal bone levels (MBLs). Results: Seven turned implants and one oxidized implant failed, giving overall cumulative survival rates of 94.7 and 99.4%, respectively. There were no differences for BoP scores (0.5 ± 0.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.6) and PD measurements (1.7 ± 0.8 mm vs 1.8 ± 1.0 mm) parameters when comparing turned and oxidized implants, respectively. The mean MBL was 1.8 ± 0.8 mm and 2.0 ± 0.9 mm for turned and oxidized implants, respectively, after more than 5 years in function (NS). Frequency distribution of MBL loss showed no statistically significant differences between the two surfaces. A total of four implants (1.4%) (three oxidized and one turned) showed a PD > 3 mm, MBL > 4 mm, and BoP. However, none of these were associated with suppuration on examination. Conclusion: The present study does not state any differences in implant failure, MBL, presence of bleeding or PD around implants when comparing turned and oxidized titanium implants after at least 5 years of function.     

Development of the Chinese version of the Oro‐facial Esthetic Scale

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Oro‐facial Esthetic Scale among Chinese‐speaking patients. The original Oro‐facial Esthetic Scale was cross‐culturally adapted in accordance with the international standards to develop a Chinese version (OES‐C). Unlike the original Oro‐facial Esthetic Scale, the version employed in this study used a 5‐point Likert scale with items rated from unsatisfactory to most satisfactory. Psychometric evaluation included the reliability and validity of the OES‐C. The reliability of the OES‐C was determined through internal consistency and test–retest methods. The validity of OES‐C was analysed by content validity, discriminative validity, construct validity and convergent validity. The corrected item‐total correlation coefficients of the OES‐C ranged from 0·859 to 0·910. The inter‐item correlation coefficients between each two of the eight items of the OES‐C ranged from 0·766 to 0·922. The values of ICC ranged from 0·79 (95% CI = 0·54–0·98) to 0·93 (95% CI = 0·87–0·99), indicating an excellent agreement. Construct validity was proved by the presence of one‐factor structure that accounted for 83·507% of the variance and fitted well into the model. Convergent validity was confirmed by the association between OES‐C scores and self‐reported oral aesthetics and three questions from the Oral Health Impact Profile related to aesthetics (correlation coefficients ranged from ?0·830 to ?0·702, P < 0·001). OES‐C scores discriminated aesthetically impaired patients from healthy controls. This study provides preliminary evidence concerning the reliability and validity of the OES‐C. The results show that the OES‐C may be a useful tool for assessment of oro‐facial esthetics in China.     

Short‐term post‐operative pain and discomfort following insertion of mini‐implants for retaining mandibular overdentures: a randomized controlled trial

The retention of removable dentures by mini‐implants is a relatively recent treatment modality and may lead to minimal post‐operative trauma. This study compared post‐operative pain and discomfort following the insertion of mini‐implants (two or four) or two standard‐size implants for the retention of mandibular overdentures. One hundred and twenty edentulous participants (mean age 59·5 ± 8·5 years) were randomly allocated into three groups according to received treatment: (GI) four mini‐implants, (GII) two mini‐implants or (GIII) two standard implants. Seven days after implant insertion, patients answered questions (100‐mm VAS) relating to pain, swelling, and discomfort with chewing, speech and hygiene, considering their experiences during the 1st and 6th day. Groups were compared by two‐way anova (α = 0·05). All participants (GI: 38; GII: 42; GIII: 40) were analysed after 7 days. At the 6th day, GI felt significantly higher pain than GII and GIII. GI also reported more difficulty in performing oral hygiene practices than GIII during the 1st day. There was no significant difference between groups for the other questions and periods. No participant suffered unexpected side effects. The use of four mini‐implants induces more intense post‐operative pain at the 6th day than the insertion of two mini‐ or conventional fixtures, as well as more difficult oral hygiene on the 1st day. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01411683; FAPESP, 2011/00688‐7 and 2011/23347‐0.