Technical implications of living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience

Liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease is the treatment of choice in current surgical practice. However, the shortage of cadaveric organs has limited this treatment option for many years. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may be an option to overcome the organ shortage. In the present series we report a single-center experience with 39 LDLT performed from March 2000 to June 2003. The main indications for LDLT was hepatitis B cirrhosis (11 patients). The recipient hepatectomy was performed with caval preservation. The hepatic vein anastomosis was performed either to recipient hepatic vein or inferior vena cava. The portal vein anastomosis was performed either to the recipient's main or right portal branch. Biliary diversion was performed to the recipient biliary ducts if possible, otherwise to a jejunal loop in Roux-en-Y fashion. The survival rate at the end of one year was 71%. The leading cause of mortality was sepsis in five patients. Biliary complications developed in 20% of the recipients. All bile leaks were from the Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Hepatic artery thrombosis was diagnosed in four patients by loss of hepatic blood flow on Doppler ultrasound. LDLT is a major surgical option for end-stage liver disease, particularly for countries with low rates of organ donation. However, there are technical challenges to be overcome such as small vessels from segmental grafts and multiple small bile ducts.     

Preemptive transplantation and long-term outcome in living donor kidney transplantation, single-center experience

Although preemptive transplantation of kidneys from living donors without the previous initiation of dialysis is associated with longer allograft survival in a USRDS cohort, the effect of pretransplantation dialysis on graft outcome is still controversial in Korea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differential effects on long-term outcomes of living donor kidney transplantation according to initiation of dialysis and its duration or no dialysis. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 494 patients who received a first kidney transplant from a living donor between 1990 and 2006. The mean duration for dialysis was 14.5+/-22.2 months. The 10-year patient survival of 98.0% in the preemptive group was not significantly higher than the dialysis group (91.2%, P>.05). However, 10-year graft survival was higher in the preemptive than the dialysis group (preemptive 94.4%, dialysis 76.5%; P<.05). The differential effect of pretransplant dialysis either by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis was not significant, although peritoneal dialysis as a pretransplant treatment seemed to be beneficial on long-term graft survival (5-year graft survival; peritoneal 94.8% and hemodialysis 89.2%). The duration of dialysis did not affect graft survival in our study cohort. In conclusion, we suggest that preemptive transplantation should be applied to eligible patients.     

Hepatopulmonary syndrome after living donor liver transplantation and deceased donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a progressive, debilitating complication of end-stage liver disease. In contrast to the well-established reversal of HPS after deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), little has been written about the natural course of HPS after the newer procedure of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We describe HPS in a small series of 4 liver transplant recipients (2 DDLT; 2 LDLT) at a single center. Before transplantation, these 4 patients had a mean shunt fraction of 23.6 +/- 14.3% and a mean PaO2 of 58.5 +/- 11.3 mm Hg. All 4 patients used supplemental oxygen before transplantation. Sixteen weeks after transplantation, all 4 patients had normalized or improved shunt fraction and PaO2. These patients regained normal pulmonary function within a few months, despite the period of hepatic regeneration after LDLT. In conclusion, both DDLT and LDLT are associated with rapid and dramatic reversal of HPS.     

Vascular complications after living donor liver transplantation: a Brazilian, single-center experience

Background

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), vascular complications are more frequently seen than in deceased donor transplantation. Early arterial, portal vein, or hepatic vein thromboses are complications that can lead to graft loss and patient death. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, treatment, and outcome of vascular complications after LDLT in a single Brazilian center.

Methods

Between December 2001 and December 2010, we performed 130 LDLT. Sixty-four recipients were children (27 weighing <10 kg).

Results

Nine recipients had vascular complications. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) occurred in 4 (3.1%), portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in 3 (2.3%), and hepatic vein thrombosis (HVT) and hepatic arterial stenosis (HAS) in 1 (0.8%) patient each. Complications were identified by Doppler and confirmed by angiography or angiotomography. Patients with HAT were listed for retransplantation. One died before retransplant. Two children were submitted to retransplantation; one is still alive, with neurologic sequelae. One adult with HAT was retransplanted with a deceased donor graft and is doing well 58 months after surgery. Two patients with PVT died as a consequence of graft malfunction. In the other case, portal vein arterialization was performed, but patient died 11 months posttransplant. HVT was detected after cardiac reanimation and was treated with an endovascular stent. This patient died 3 months after LDLT. HAS was diagnosed after liver abscess development and was successfully treated by endovascular angioplasty. No recurrence was observed after 22 months. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 117 months.

Conclusion

Pediatric patients are more prone to develop vascular complications after LDLT. Long-term survival was statistically lower for recipients with vascular complications (33.3% vs 77.7%; P = .008).     

Donor outcomes in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation: single-center experience in Egypt

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an alternative source of organs for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) in absence of deceased donor LT. In LDLT the greatest concern is donor safety. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of donors after right lobe liver donation in a single LT center in Egypt. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty LDL resections were performed from 2001 to 2004. The mean donor age was 29.2 +/- 6.4 years. Residual liver volume was 41.1 +/- 4.5%. Mean operative time was 560 +/- 62.2 minutes; mean ICU stay, less than 24 hours; mean hospital stay, 15.4 +/- 7.7 days; and mean follow-up period, 6 months. RESULTS: There was no mortality. The overall complication rate was 68% (34 donors). Major complications included intraoperative bleeding in one, biliary leak in two, and pneumonia in three donors. Minor complications included mild pleural effusion in 13 donors, transient ascites in 10, mild depression in 7, intra-abdominal collections in 3, and wound infections in 1 donor. Residual liver volume did not affect the complication rate. None required reoperation. Return to predonation activity occurred within 6 to 8 weeks. No liver impairment occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Right lobe adult LDLT is a safe procedure with regard to donor outcome. Major complications occurred in only 10% of our series.     

2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: To review a single center's experience and outcome with living donor transplants. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Outcome after living donor transplants is better than after cadaver donor transplants. Since the inception of the authors' program, they have performed 2,540 living donor transplants. For the most recent cohort of recipients, improvements in patient care and immunosuppressive protocols have improved outcome. In this review, the authors analyzed outcome in relation to protocol. METHODS: The authors studied patient and graft survival by decade. For those transplanted in the 1990s, the impact of immunosuppressive protocol, donor source, diabetes, and preemptive transplantation was analyzed. The incidence of rejection, posttransplant steroid-related complications, and return to work was determined. Finally, multivariate analysis was used to study risk factors for worse 1-year graft survival and, for those with graft function at 1 year, to study risk factors for worse long-term survival. RESULTS: For each decade since 1960, outcome has improved after living donor transplants. Compared with patients transplanted in the 1960s, those transplanted in the 1990s have better 8-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates. Death with function and chronic rejection have continued to be a major cause of graft loss, whereas acute rejection has become a rare cause of graft loss. Cardiovascular deaths have become a more predominant cause of patient death; infection has decreased. Donor source (e.g., ideally HLA-identical sibling) continues to be important. For living donor transplants, rejection and graft survival rates are related to donor source. The authors show that patients who had preemptive transplants or less than 1 year of dialysis have better 5-year graft survival and more frequently return to full-time employment. Readmission and complications remain problems; of patients transplanted in the 1990s, only 36% never required readmission. Similarly, steroid-related complications remain common. The authors' multivariate analysis shows that the major risk factor for worse 1-year graft survival was delayed graft function. For recipients with 1-year graft survival, risk factors for worse long-term outcome were pretransplant smoking, pretransplant peripheral vascular disease, pretransplant dialysis for more than 1 year, one or more acute rejection episodes, and donor age older than 55. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the outcome of living donor transplants has continued to improve. However, for living donors, donor source affects outcome. The authors also identify other major risk factors affecting both short- and long-term outcome.     

Living donor liver transplantation: early single-center experience

Adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is an accepted procedure to overcome the organ shortage. The advantages of ALDLT must be balanced against the first concern of donor safety. We analyzed the results of our early experience among a series of eight ALDLT performed between April 2001 and October 2003. All patients were listed as United Network for Organ Sharing UNOS status 2b and 3. Transplant recipients consisted of four men and four women. The living donors included four sons, three daughters, and one son-in-law (ages 20 to 45 years). One donor was anti-HBc-positive and negative for hepatitis B virus-DNA by polymerase chain reaction analysis in serum and in liver tissue. GR/WR >0.8 and fatty liver <10% were considered suitable for the hepatectomy. Residual left lobe volume was at least 33%. No exogenous blood and blood products were transfused into the donors and a cell-saver device was used in all donors (blood loss 490 +/- 160 mL). All procedures were right lobe hepatectomy; in one case the middle hepatic vein was withdrawn with the right graft. The mean ischemia time was 1.5 +/- 0.5 hours. All donors survived the procedure. Median hospital stay was 8.5 +/- 2.1 days in all donors but one who had a long stay because of drug-related hepatitis. One graft was lost and one donor aborted because of preoperative overestimated volumetry. Complications were experienced by two donors (25%). Five recipients (62.5%) experienced major complications; one patient underwent retransplantation because of donor graft loss. Two biliary and two vascular complications (33.3%) occurred in three patients. No perioperative death occurred. Two patients died at 9 and 10 months after transplant because of heart and respiratory failure in the first case and tumor recurrence in the second. One-year actuarial survival is 75%. ALDLT using right lobe has gained acceptance to overcome the organ shortage. Donor selection criteria must be stringent with respect to residual donor hepatic volume, steatosis, and liver function.     

The marginal donor: a single-center experience in orthotopic liver transplantation

The use of marginal donors has become more common worldwide due to the sharp increase in recipients with a consequent shortage of suitable organs. The definition of "marginal donor" has not been reached by all centers. We herein analyzed our single-center experience over the last 3 years in liver transplantation (OLT) to evaluate the outcomes of using a high percentage of so-called "marginal donors", according to the current classification from the National (Italian) Center of Transplantation (CNT). Among the 78 OLT performed in 77 patients from January 1, 2003 to October 31, 2005, donor livers were divided into three groups according to the CNT classification. We evaluated donor variables, cold ischemia time (CIT), warm ischemia time (WIT), MELD score, and length of hospital stay. Histologic graft steatosis was correlated with estimated steatosis by ultrasound. There were no differences among the three graft recipient groups concerning CIT, WIT, MELD score, and the length of hospital stay. Steatosis is indicated in all series as a definite variable for a higher risk of postoperative mortality. CIT is necessarily related to donor retrieval policy and organization. Donor age seemed also to be related to a possible increase in postoperative mortality, but there are significant variations in the definition of the age limit. We failed to observe a correlation between a higher mortality rate and any of the variables currently listed to define a "marginal donor." A shorter CIT seemed to positively influence the role played by the other variables identifying a "marginal liver." Finally, the use of HCV(+) or HBV(+) grafts did not lead to an increased mortality.     

Long-term graft outcome of living donor renal transplantation: single center experience

The number of potential renal transplant recipients far exceeds the number of cadaveric donors. For this reason, living-related donors (LRD) and living-unrelated donors (LURD) have been used to decrease the cadaveric donor shortage. We analyzed 571 living donor transplants for 25 years in our center.

Materials and Methods

From 1978 to 2003, 571 patients underwent LRD (n = 253), or LURD (n = 318) kidney transplantation. The patients were divided into precyclosporine era (from 1978 to 1987, n = 44; era I), cyclosporine era (from 1988 to 1997, n = 367, era II), and cyclosporine plus mycophenolate-mofetil era (from 1998 to 2003, n = 160, era III). We compared the graft survival rate of the recipients according to the immunosuppressants, analyzing the variables of donor and recipient age, sex, HLA matching, and acute rejection rate. We also compared long-term survival rates between LRD and LURD.

Results

The 1- and 10-year graft survival rates of all patients were 93.4% and 77.4%, respectively. The 1- and 10- year graft survival rates were 75.0% and 36.3% in era I; and 94.8 % and 80.2% in era II. The 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 96.6% and 93.3% in era III (P < .001). The occurrence rate of an acute rejection episode was 11.4% (era I), 21.8% (era II), and 14.4% (era III) (P = .056). The 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 92.3% and 81.7% among LRD transplants, and 94.2% and 86.9% among LURD transplants, respectively (P = .122).

Discussion

The graft survival rates of living-donor transplants are improving due to advances in patient care and new immunosuppressive agents.     

Pediatric renal transplantation: a single-center experience

A retrospective analysis was performed on 33 pediatric renal transplants performed over last 8 years. The mean age and weight at the time of transplantation was 12.5 +/- 3.86 years and 28.75 +/- 9.04 kg, respectively. Twenty-six children were boys and 7 were girls. Thirteen children had underlying glomerular disease and 17 had tubulointerstitial disease. All transplants were living related except two, which were from deceased donors. The median duration of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis before transplantation were 2.75 and 4 months, respectively. The most common posttransplant complication was urinary tract infection. Immunosuppression medications in the majority included cyclosporine, azathioprine, and corticosteroids. Actuarial graft survivals at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94%, 90%, and 82%, respectively.     

The role of donor-recipient relationship in long-term outcomes of living donor renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Graft failure related to acute and chronic rejection remains an important problem in transplantation. An association has been reported between microchimerism and the development of tolerance. Since it has been established that cells of fetal origin can be found in maternal tissues long after parturition, and cells of maternal origin may persist for years in offspring, we hypothesized that this fetal-maternal microchimerism may confer tolerance and thus less graft loss for kidneys transplanted between mothers and their offspring. METHODS: We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to compare death-censored graft survival among recipients of living-related renal transplants sharing at least one human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype with their donor. A total of 23,064 such transplants were reported from 1995 to 2004. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to compare death-censored graft survival among the following donor-recipient pairings: child-to-mother, child-to-father, mother-to-child, father-to-child, 1-haplotype matched siblings, and HLA-identical siblings. RESULTS: HLA-identical sibling recipients had the best survival, but results for the child-to-father group were not significantly worse (hazard ratio=1.07, P=0.47). Mother-to-child transplants had the poorest graft survival (hazard ratio=2.61, P<0.0001). We found no evidence of tolerance to kidneys transplanted between mothers and offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of 1-haplotype matched living-related renal transplants argues against tolerance to organs based on fetal-maternal microchimerism. Mechanistic studies examining the relationship between chimerism and immune sensitization would be useful to explore our results, and may contribute to a better understanding of tolerance.     

Complications in the right lobe adult living donor: single-center experience in China

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been accepted as an established treatment modality for end-stage liver diseases to alleviate the shortage of cadaveric organs. Reported complication rates for right lobe adult living donors vary, but are estimated to be approximately 35% with a surgical mortality rate of approximately 0.3%. Our objective was to evaluate the complications in right lobe adult living donors in a single center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review includes 62 adult living donors who underwent right hemi-hepatectomy between January 2002 and December 2006. Eighteen donors were men and 44 were women (range, 18-65 years; median age, 36 years). The mean follow-up time for the donors was 16 months (range, 3 months-4 years). RESULTS: All donors were alive and well at the end of the study period. Complications included pleural effusion (n=6; 9.68%), bile leaks (n=3; 4.84%), wound infection (n=2; 3.23%), pneumonia (n=2; 3.23%), chyle leak (n=1; 1.61%), intra-abdominal bleeding (n=1; 1.61%), subphrenic effusion (n=1; 1.61%), portal vein thrombosis (n=1; 1.61%), and chylothorax (n=1; 1.61%). There was no donor mortality, and the overall complication rate was 29%. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in the right lobe adult living donor was 29% in our center; there was no donor mortality. These complications could be avoided or overcome through intensive postoperative surveillance.     

Pregnancy after renal transplantation: ten-year single-center experience

There has been an increase in the number of pregnancies among renal transplant recipients. Our experience included 61 pregnancies in 53 patients from January 1997 to April 2007, with 6 patients having multiple pregnancies. Patients were studied for clinical, obstetrical, and perinatal outcomes. The mean patient age was 24.5 years (range, 19-38). They all received living donor kidneys. The mean transplantation-pregnancy interval was 2.7 years (range, 1.7-5.3 years). Immunosuppressive drugs consisted of cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone (pred) in 38 patients (72%); CsA, azathioprine (AZA), plus pred were used in 15 patients (28%). Pregnancy complications were chronic hypertension in 21 patients (40%), anemia in 28 (52.6%), and urinary tract infection in 18 (34%). Twelve patients (22.6%) received blood transfusions. Pre-eclampsia was diagnosed in 14 cases (26.4%) and renal dysfunction in 11 (20.7%) with pre-eclampsia assumed to be the main cause. Three patients (5.6%) had graft losses as a result of hemorrhagic shock, sepsis, and eclampsia. Premature rupture of membranes occurred in 6 cases (11.3%), and preterm delivery occurred in 14 cases (26.4%). Eleven (20.7%) newborns were small for gestational age. One club foot and one large facial hemangioma occurred in 2 infants, respectively. One case of neonatal death was registered as a result of excessive prematurity. One mother died due to sepsis. Cesarean section was performed in 24 patients (45.2%), the main indications being related to hypertension and fetal distress. There were no significant differences between MMF-treated and AZA-treated patients with respect to clinical, obstetrical, and perinatal outcomes. This group of patients was characterized by a wide range of antenatal and perinatal problems that must be managed in specialized tertiary units to achieve the best results. MMF may be as safe as AZA in pregnancy.     

Pregnancy after renal transplantation: A single-center experience

Objectives:   To examine women with renal transplants who became pregnant, and delivered at our hospital.
Methods:   Twenty-six women who had undergone renal transplantation between 1977 and 2002 became pregnant, and delivered at Osaka University Hospital. Complete medical records of twenty of them were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed.
Results:   Overall, twenty-nine pregnancies occurred in these twenty women after renal transplantation. There were spontaneous abortions in three cases, whereas pregnancy was artificially terminated five times. Thus, neonates were delivered in 21 of 29 pregnancies. One woman delivered twice and two women delivered twins. As a result, a total of 23 neonates were delivered. Mean gestational period was 35.4 weeks (range, 27–41 weeks), and mean birth weight was 2229 g (range, 724–3544 g). Regarding fetal complications, intrauterine growth retardation was observed in three cases. One child with intrauterine growth retardation died at 3 months old due to respiratory distress syndrome. One child displayed double-outlet right ventricle and another child had congenital unilateral hydronephrosis. Regarding maternal complications, prevalence of toxemia of pregnancy was 38.1%. In four of the 21 deliveries (19.0%), renal function exacerbated after delivery. Rates of graft survival for the 20 women at 1, 5 and 10 years after delivery were 100%, 85.1% and 74.4%, respectively. Prognosis for renal transplant resulted to be significantly poorer for recipients with hypertension before pregnancy than for recipients without hypertension before pregnancy (log-rank test, P  = 0.043).
Conclusions:   Rates of graft survival after delivery were mostly favorable. However, prognosis for renal function was poorer for recipients who displayed hypertension prior to pregnancy.     

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant from living related donor: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) from cadaveric donors has become a widely accepted therapeutic option for insulin-dependent uremic patients. In 1996 the first SPK from a live donor was performed. This procedure offers the advantage of a better immunologic match, reduced cold ischemia injury, and decreased waiting time. As such, it is an attractive alternative treatment for diabetic patients with end-stage nephropathy with an available living donor. METHODS: We performed six SPKs from living-related donors. There were four men and two women among the recipients; median age was 34 (range, 29-39) years. All donors were recipients' siblings with excellent HLA matching. Donors underwent standardized metabolic workup, anti-insulin and anti-islet antibody assays, and computed tomography of the abdomen. Both donors and recipients were treated with octreotide for 5 days perioperatively. After transplantation, the patients were maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the exception of one recipient of SPK from an identical twin, who received cyclosporine monotherapy. RESULTS: All the donors are doing well and have normal renal function and blood glucose levels. One-year patient, renal, and pancreatic graft survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 83%, respectively. Acute kidney rejection was documented in two patients, and both recovered completely after OKT3 therapy. No rejection of pancreatic graft has been documented. Except for one patient who lost the graft because of hemorrhagic pancreatitis, all recipients maintained serum glucose levels at less than 130 mg/dL without insulin therapy. No major surgical complications such as graft thrombosis, intra-abdominal infection, or abscess were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor SPK can represent a successful alternative to cadaveric donor SPK. The procedure can be performed safely in the donor and with low morbidity in the recipient.