《解放军护理杂志》1999～2003年主要来源期刊计量指标分析与思考

采用文献计量学方法对《解放军护理杂志》1999—2003年5年间的主要来源期刊计量指标的来源文献量、平均引用率和参考文献量进行分析,客观反映杂志及其论文的学术地位;以进一步引导护理人员正确、有效地引用文献,提升杂志整体质量,适应护理学科不断创新和发展的需要。     

《护理管理杂志》2004年文献计量学分析

目的分析《护理管理杂志》2004年刊载论文及其引文,以了解该刊的现状和地位,评价其学术水平和期刊质量。方法采用文献计量学方法,对《护理管理杂志》2004年刊载的论文进行载文和引文分析。结果载文量358篇;载文作者分布在30个省及直辖市,合著率为2.6人/篇;总引文量1725条,平均引文量4.82条/篇;中文引文率88.8%,英文引文率11.0%,日文引文率0.2%;期刊引文率76.5%,图书引文率21.6%;刊物自引率为4.1%;中文核心期刊共16种。结论《护理管理杂志》虽然创刊时间较短,但在护理领域已有一定影响力。它拥有一批优秀的作者群体,论文学术质量较高,已成为该学科的核心期刊。     

Eugene Garfield--追寻答案的人

Eugene Garfield是美国著名的文献信息检索专家.他从一个普通用户的观点,提出如何高效率检索最新信息的问题,并匠心独运地将引文索引与文献评价有机结合,创造了garfield原理,创建了SCI评价体系和美国科学信息研究所,并担任首任主席.带领他的团队,经过半个世纪拼搏,使SCI在其他文献索引工具中脱颖而出,被公认为是科学信息交流和信息科学的革命性创造.本文通过简述引文检索与信息科学领域发展史来介绍他充满传奇色彩的一生.     

文献计量分析法在护理研究热点分析中的应用进展

文章回顾和总结国内外文献计量分析法和基于文献计量分析法探索护理研究热点的相关研究,阐述了基于引文和关键词或主题词的文献计量分析法的概念、原理、特点和护理领域中的应用进展,以期为广大护理科研人员在寻找研究切入点时提供一种客观的方法。     

我国护理学硕士研究生学位论文引文分析

目的:描述我国护理学硕士研究生学位论文引文情况,反映学位论文的学术水平及研究生对文献信息吸收利用能力。方法:对中国科学技术信息研究所在2006年11月1日前所收藏的254篇护理学硕士研究生学位论文按时序采用引文分析法进行分析。结果:学位论文平均引文量为65.81条,并有逐年上升趋势;引文类型中期刊引文率为81.02%,是学位论文的第一文献来源,其次是图书、网络文献、学位论文和会议论文等;引文语种以英文为主,占53.34%,其次是中文,占46.66%,再次是日文等其他语种,仅占0.18%;学位论文的平均普赖斯指数为41.67%;学位论文中有12.20%著录不规范,但有逐年下降的趋势。结论:我国护理学硕士研究生学位论文的学术水平较高,研究生对文献信息具有很强的吸收和利用能力。     

Invited Review Article: Bibliometrics and Evaluation of Research Performance

Bibliometrics has been increasingly applied to research evaluation in recent years. This article reviews studies which supply data to assess the validity and accuracy of citation indicators as a measure of performance. To illustrate the points raised, the article also examines results obtained by case studies on Nordic cancer and cardiovascular research. It concludes that citations measure recognition of a piece of work by the international scientific community, but are also influenced by publication structures, citation conventions and social relations in the scientific community. Citation analysis complements peer review by supplying evidence to assess its accuracy and reliability.     

Understanding belief using citation networks

Citation is a powerful method for establishing belief. Published statements gain credibility when followed by citations. Citation in its purest form consists of the scholarly connection of authors' ideas and claims to existing literature, yet there are also non-scholarly uses of citation that are best called citation distortions. Unfounded biomedical belief systems arising from citation distortions may become widely accepted as fact. The development of methodology for the study of citation distortions and belief systems regarding scientific claims was recently described. Here, I discuss further the methodological approaches to studying published scientific belief systems and identifying citation distortions.     

Technology in nursing scholarship: use of citation reference managers

Nurses, especially those in academia, feel the pressure to publish but have a limited time to write. One of the more time-consuming and frustrating tasks of research, and subsequent publications, is the collection and organization of accurate citations of sources of information. The purpose of this article is to discuss three types of citation reference managers (personal bibliographic software) and how their use can provide consistency and accuracy in recording all the information needed for the research and writing process. The advantages and disadvantages of three software programs, EndNote, Reference Manager, and ProCite, are discussed. These three software products have a variety of options that can be used in personal data management to assist researchers in becoming published authors.     

2014-2017年中国科学引文数据库护理学期刊收录广西科研论文的文献计量学分析

目的 分析近3年广西护理学科的研究现状、研究热点,为开展科学研究提供参考。 方法 收集2014年1月-2017年6月中国科学引文数据库(Chinese science citation database,CSCD)护理学期刊收录的广西科研论文,采用Excel建立数据库对文献进行文献计量学分析,使用Bicomb软件、SPSS 22.0对关键词进行词频分析和共词聚类分析。 结果 最终纳入文献108篇。2016年发表文献最多,50.0%的论文发表机构位于南宁,10.2%的论文被引频次达10次及以上,63.0%的论文获得基金支持;截取高频关键词17个,通过共词聚类分析总结出3个研究热点。 结论 广西护理科研近3年来稳步发展,不同地区、不同机构间学科发展不均衡。护理人员应充分利用资源优势,以本地区高发疾病为切入点开展更具深度和广度的研究,提高护理服务水平和质量。     

How well does journal impact work in the assessment of papers onclinical physiology and nuclear medicine?

This study reports a citation analysis of 217scientific papers on clinical physiology and nuclear medicine published in 69 different journalsduring the years 1985–92. The actual citation frequency was compared with the journal‘impact factor’ (i.e. the average number of times a paper is cited in a particularjournal in the year of publication and the subsequent year). The average impact factor per paperwas 1·96 and per journal 1·92 (range 0·0–22·8). Adirect relation was found between the journal impact factor and the citation factor (i.e. theactual citations in the year of publication and the subsequent year) (journals with five or morepapers R=0·69, P<0·01; all journals R=0·40, P<0·001). However, the citation factor wassignificantly below the journal impact factor (P<0·0001). An almostlinear relation was found between cumulated citations and time (R=0·99, P<0·02–0·0001), but an initial phase of nocitation was identified, and the number of citations per year reached a maximum or plateau3–7 years after publication, which was later than the general maximum of 2–3years for all medical specialities. In a sample of 200 known autocitations, 75% of thepapers had full recovery, 3% mixed recovery and 22% no recovery, giving anoverall recovery of 70%. In conclusion, although a phase of no citation was identified,which gave a lower citation factor than the journal impact factor, the citation frequencyincreased over time, and altogether there seems to be a good agreement between journalimpact factor and overall citation frequency of papers on clinical physiology and nuclearmedicine.     

Bibliometric awareness in nursing scholarship: Can we afford to ignore it any longer?

In contemporary nursing academia, it is unthinkable that topics such as research methods, evidence-based practice, and the translation of research into practice would be omitted from nursing curricula at any level. What is surprising, however, is that despite a broad educational emphasis on "teaching research", the rising importance of bibliometrics appears to have been largely neglected. If nursing scholarship and nursing scholars are to prosper in the highly competitive field of modern health research, a sophisticated understanding of citation-based methods is clearly required. Armed with this knowledge, one can more successfully argue why scarce research funding, that might otherwise be channeled elsewhere, ought to be assigned to nursing researchers. We hereby urge readers to reflect on the extent to which bibliometrics is covered within formal nursing curricula at their college or university. It is no longer a case of if a graduate nurse will need this skill set for their future professional development, but when.     

2003-2012年护理学高被引论文学术特征分析及启示

目的：为护理学期刊编辑选题、组稿,提升期刊质量和学术影响力提供参考。方法：运用文献计量学方法,从期刊、发表栏目、主题、研究方法、基金资助5方面进行描述性统计分析。结果：护理学高被引论文期刊、发表栏目、研究方法呈集中性分布,主题呈集中性和动态性分布,基金资助以院校、省级为主,省级基金资助比例高于国家级基金。结论：护理学期刊编辑应围绕研究热点展开选题,加强产生高被引论文栏目建设与组稿,积极挖掘优质稿源,提高国家级基金资助论文的刊出比例。     

科学引文索引收录护理期刊的现况分析

目的分析近年来科学引文索引(science citation index,SCI)收录的99种护理期刊的计量指标,以期为广大护理学者提供投稿依据。方法选择2012年SCI收录的99种护理期刊为研究对象。期刊的影响因子(impact factor,IF)以ISI Webof Knowledge JCR的最新数据(2013-06-15)为准。结果共有99种护理期刊进入SCI,IF≥2分3种、1分≤IF<2分的39种、0.5≤IF<1分的42种、IF<0.5分15种。99种护理期刊中,以英语为主,共93种,占94.0%;可分为综合类、妇产科类、公共卫生类、肿瘤类、精神病类、急救类、护理教育类、儿科类、老年护理类、心血管疾病类、皮肤及伤口护理类、护理管理类、特种疾病相关护理类及其他类,其中心血管疾病类期刊的IF最高,为(1.487±0.165)分。结论要尽快发展国内护理学科、鼓励创办英文护理学术期刊,进一步扩大中国护理学界在国际上的影响力。