Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: a comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia

The goal of the Dialysis Outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study was to compare the survival of patients on hemodialysis (HD) vs peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a network of renal units in Colombia. The DOC study examined a historical cohort of incident patients starting dialysis therapy between 1 January 2001 and 1 December 2003 and followed until 1 December 2005, measuring demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables. Only patients older than 18 years were included. As-treated and intention-to-treat statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. There were 1094 eligible patients in total and 923 were actually enrolled: 47.3% started HD therapy and 52.7% started PD therapy. Of the patients studied, 751 (81.3%) remained in their initial therapy until the end of the follow-up period, death, or censorship. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, creatinine, calcium, and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) variables did not show statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups. Diabetes, socioeconomic level, educational level, phosphorus, Charlson Co-morbidity Index, and cardiovascular history did show a difference, and were less favorable for patients on PD. Residual renal function was greater for PD patients. Also, there were differences in the median survival time between groups: 27.2 months for PD vs 23.1 months for HD (P=0.001) by the intention-to-treat approach; and 24.5 months for PD vs 16.7 months for HD (P<0.001) by the as-treated approach. When performing univariate Cox analyses using the intention-to-treat approach, associations were with age > or =65 years (hazard ratio (HR)=2.21; confidence interval (CI) 95% (1.77-2.755); P<0.001); history of cardiovascular disease (HR=1.96; CI 95% (1.58-2.90); P<0.001); diabetes (HR=2.34; CI 95% (1.88-2.90); P<0.001); and SGA (mild or moderate-severe malnutrition) (HR=1.47; CI 95% (1.17-1.79); P=0.001); but no association was found with gender (HR=1.03, CI 95% 0.83-1.27; P=0.786). Similar results were found with the as-treated approach, with additional associations found with Charlson Index (0-2) (HR=0.29; Cl 95% (0.22-0.38); P<0.001); Charlson Index (3-4) (HR=0.61; Cl 95% (0.48-0.79); P<0.001); and SGA (mild-severe malnutrition) (HR=1.43; Cl 95% (1.15-1.77); P<0.001). Similarly, the multivariate Cox model was run with the variables that had shown association in previous analyses, and it was found that the variables explaining the survival of patients with end-stage renal disease in our study were age, SGA, Charlson Comorbidity Index 5 and above, diabetes, healthcare regimes I and II, and socioeconomic level 2. The results of Cox proportional risk model in both the as-treated and intention-to-treat analyses showed that there were no statistically significant differences in survival of PD and HD patients: intention-to-treat HD/PD (HR 1.127; CI 95%: 0.855-1.484) and as-treated HD/PD (HR 1.231; CI 95%: 0.976-1.553). In this historical cohort of incident patients, there was a trend, although not statistically significant, for a higher (12.7%) adjusted mortality risk associated with HD when compared to PD, even though the PD patients were poorer, were more likely to be diabetic, and had higher co-morbidity scores than the HD patients. The variables that most influenced survival were age, diabetes, comorbidity, healthcare regime, socioeconomic level, nutrition, and education.     

The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND: While the survival ramifications of dialysis modality selection are still debated, it seems reasonable to postulate that outcome comparisons are not the same for all patients at all times. Trends in available data indicate the relative risk of death with hemodialysis (HD) compared to peritoneal dialysis (PD) varies by time on dialysis and the presence of various risk factors. This study was undertaken to identify key patient characteristics for which the risk of death differs by dialysis modality. METHODS: Analyses utilized incidence data from 398,940 United States Medicare patients initiating dialysis between 1995 and 2000. Proportional hazards regression identified the presence of diabetes, age, and the presence of comorbidity as factors that significantly interact with treatment modality. Stratifying by these factors, proportional and nonproportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks of death [RR (HD:PD)]. RESULTS: Of the 398,940 patients studied, 11.6% used PD as initial therapy, 45% had diabetes mellitus (DM), 51% were 65 years or older, and 55% had at least one comorbidity. Among the 178,693 (45%) patients with no baseline comorbidity, adjusted mortality rates in nondiabetic (non-DM) patients were significantly higher on HD than on PD [age 18-44: RR (95% CI) = 1.24 (1.07, 1.44); age 45-64: RR = 1.13 (1.02, 1.25); age 65+: RR = 1.13 (1.05, 1.21)]. Among diabetic (DM) patients with no comorbidity, HD was associated with a higher risk of death among younger patients [age 18-44: RR = 1.22(1.05, 1.42)] and a lower risk of death among older patients [age 45-64: RR = 0.92 (0.85, 1.00); age 65+: RR = 0.86 (0.79, 0.93)]. Within the group of 220,247 (55%) patients with baseline comorbidity, adjusted mortality rates were not different between HD and PD among non-DM patients [age 18-44: RR = 1.19 (0.94, 1.50); age 45-64: RR = 1.01 (0.92, 1.11); age 65+: RR = 0.96 (0.91, 1.01)] and younger DM patients [age 18-44: RR = 1.10 (0.92, 1.32)], but were lower with HD among older DM patients with baseline comorbidity [age 45-64: RR = 0.82 (0.77, 0.87); age 65+: RR = 0.80 (0.76, 0.85)]. CONCLUSION: Valid mortality comparisons between HD and PD require patient stratification according to major risk factors known to interact with treatment modality. Survival differences between HD and PD are not constant, but vary substantially according to the underlying cause of ESRD, age, and level of baseline comorbidity. These results may help identify technical advances that will improve outcomes of patients on dialysis.     

Dialysis modality,humoral response to vaccine,and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk: Comparative prospective evaluation

Background

COVID-19 vaccinations have a central role in decreasing severe SARS-CoV-2 disease complications. This study investigated the long-term humoral immune response to BNT162b2 vaccine among hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and their relative risk for COVID-19 infection.

Methods

This prospective, observational study included maintenance HD and PD patients who had received at least two BNT162b2 vaccine doses. Levels of antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured 6 and 12 months after the first vaccine dose, and 2–3 weeks after the third and fourth vaccine doses. Patients were divided according to dialysis modality (HD or PD). Humoral response was evaluated at different time points among different vaccine regimens (two vs. three vs. four doses of vaccine). An adjusted multivariate model was used to assess cumulative risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results

Eighty-seven HD and 36 PD patients were included. Among them, 106 (86%) received at least three vaccine doses. Both HD and PD patients demonstrated marked increases in humoral response 2–3 weeks after the third dose (mean anti-S antibody increased from 452 ± 501 AU/mL to 19,556 ± 14,949 AU/mL, p < 0.001). By 6 months after the third dose, antibody titers had declined significantly (mean anti-S antibody 9841 ± 10,493 AU/mL, p < 0.001). HD patients had higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection than PD patients (OR 4.4 [95% CI 1.4–13.6], p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, the most important predictor for SARS-CoV-2 infection was dialysis modality.

Conclusion

This study found a high antibody response rate after the third and fourth doses of BNT162b2 vaccine among dialysis patients. Hemodialysis as dialysis modality is an important predictor of COVID-19 infection, despite similar humoral responses to vaccine in peritoneal dialysis.     

Social support predicts survival in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Social support is a consistent predictor of survival, as evidenced in empirical studies in patients with cancer or cardiovascular disease. In the area of renal diseases, this topic has not yet been studied extensively. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the association between social support and survival for patients on dialysis. METHODS: Between December 1998 and January 2002, 528 incident haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients from multiple centres in The Netherlands were consecutively recruited as part of the NECOSAD-2 study. Patients completed the Social Support List (SSL) at 3 months after the start of dialysis. The SSL measured two aspects of social support: interaction and discrepancy. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate all-cause mortality risk from baseline till censor date on 1 January 2005. RESULTS: Perceiving a discrepancy between expected and received social support was associated with increased mortality: social companionship (RR(adj): 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.13), daily emotional support (RR(adj): 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18), and total support (RR(adj): 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). This association was similar for PD and HD patients. Social support (interaction) was not associated with survival, neither in the whole sample nor when stratified by therapy modality. CONCLUSIONS: These results point to the importance of psychosocial risk factors for mortality in patients on dialysis. More efforts are needed to improve support for these patients.     

Associations of dialysis modality and infectious mortality in incident dialysis patients in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present investigation is to compare rates, types, causes, and timing of infectious death in incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients in Australia and New Zealand. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: The study included all patients starting dialysis therapy between April 1, 1995, and December 31, 2005. PREDICTOR: Dialysis modality. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Rates of and time to infectious death were compared by using Poisson regression, Kaplan-Meier, and competing risks multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses. RESULTS: 21,935 patients started dialysis therapy (first treatment PD, n = 6,020; HD, n = 15,915) during the study period, and 1,163 patients (5.1%) died of infectious causes (PD, 529 patients; 7.6% versus HD, 634 patients; 4.2%). Incidence rates of infectious mortality in PD and HD patients were 2.8 and 1.7/100 patient-years, respectively (incidence rate ratio PD versus HD, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47 to 1.86). After performing competing risks multivariate Cox analyses allowing for an interaction between time on study and modality because of identified nonproportionality of hazards, PD consistently was associated with increased hazard of death from infection compared with HD after 6 months of treatment (<6 months hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.54; 6 months to 2 years HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.59; 2 to 6 years HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.80; >6 years HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.76 to 4.33). This increased risk of infectious death in PD patients was largely accounted for by an increased risk of death caused by bacterial or fungal peritonitis. LIMITATIONS: Patients were not randomly assigned to their initial dialysis modality. Residual confounding and coding bias could not be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis modality selection significantly influences risks, types, causes, and timing of fatal infections experienced by patients with end-stage kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand.     

Mortality differences by dialysis modality among incident ESRD patients with and without coronary artery disease

It is unclear whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with hemodialysis (HD) confers a survival advantage in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This hypothesis was tested in a national cohort of 107,922 patients starting dialysis therapy between May 1, 1995, and July 31, 1997. Data on patient characteristics were obtained from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medical Evidence Form (CMS) and linked to mortality data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Patients were classified on the basis of CAD presence and followed until death or the end of 2 yr. Nonproportional Cox regression models estimated the relative risk (RR) of death for patients with and without CAD by dialysis modality using primarily the intent-to-treat but also the as-treated approach. Diabetic patients (DM) and nondiabetic patients (non-DM) were analyzed separately. Among DM, patients with CAD treated with PD had a 23% higher RR (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.34) compared with similar HD patients, whereas patients without CAD receiving PD had a 17% higher RR (CI, 1.08 to 1.26) compared with HD. Among non-DM, patients with CAD treated with PD had a 20% higher RR (CI. 1.10 to 1.32) compared with HD patients, whereas patients without CAD had similar survival on PD or HD (RR = 0.99; CI, 0.93 to 1.05). The mortality risk for new ESRD patients with CAD differed by treatment modality. In both DM and non-DM, patients with CAD treated with PD had significantly poorer survival compared with HD. Whether differences in solute clearance and/or cardiac risk profiles between PD and HD may explain these findings deserves further investigation.     

Pre‐transplant dialysis modality does not influence short‐ or long‐term outcome in kidney transplant recipients: analysis of paired kidneys from the same deceased donor

Previous studies have reported contradictory results regarding the effect of pre‐transplant dialysis modality on the outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT). To minimize the confounding effect of donor‐related variables, we performed a donor‐matched retrospective comparison of 160 patients that received only one modality of pre‐transplant dialysis (peritoneal dialysis [PD] and hemodialysis [HD] in 80 patients each) and that subsequently underwent KT at our center between January 1990 and December 2007. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between pre‐transplant dialysis modality and primary study outcomes (death‐censored graft survival and patient survival). To control for imbalances in recipient‐related baseline characteristics, we performed additional adjustments for the propensity score (PS) for receiving pre‐transplant PD (versus HD). There were no significant differences according to pre‐transplant dialysis modality in death‐censored graft survival (PS‐adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.25–1.68) or patient survival (aHR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.13–2.68). There were no differences in 10‐year graft function or in the incidence of post‐transplant complications either, except for a higher risk of lymphocele in patients undergoing PD (odds ratio: 4.31; 95% CI: 1.15–16.21). In conclusion, pre‐transplant dialysis modality in KT recipients does not impact short‐ or long‐term graft outcomes or patient survival.     

Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of mortality rates in patients on hemodialysis versus those on peritoneal dialysis have been inconsistent. We hypothesized that comorbidity has an important effect on differential survival in these two groups of patients. METHODS: Eight hundred twenty-two consecutive patients at 11 Canadian institutions with irreversible renal failure had an extensive assessment of comorbid illness collected prospectively, immediately prior to starting dialysis therapy. The cohort was assembled between March 1993 and November 1994; vital status was ascertained as of January 1, 1998. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 24 months. Thirty-four percent of patients at baseline, 50% at three months, and 51% at six months used peritoneal dialysis. Values for a previously validated comorbidity score were higher for patients on hemodialysis at baseline (4.0 vs. 3.1, P < 0.001), three months (3.7 vs. 3.2, P = 0.001), and six months (3.6 vs. 3.2, P = 0.005). The overall mortality was 41%. The unadjusted peritoneal dialysis/hemodialysis mortality hazard ratios were 0.65 (95% CI, 0. 51 to 0.83, P = 0.0005), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.06, P = NS), and 0. 83 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.08, P = NS) based on the modality of dialysis in use at baseline, three months, and six months, respectively. When adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, cardiac failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, malignancy, and acuity of renal failure, the corresponding hazard ratios were 0.79 (95% CI, 0. 62 to 1.01, P = NS), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.28, P = NS), and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.24, P = NS). Adjustment for a previously validated comorbidity score resulted in hazard ratios of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.94, P = 0.01), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.19, P = NS), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.13, P = NS) at baseline, three months, and six months. There was no survival advantage for either modality in any of the major subgroups defined by age, sex, or diabetic status. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis in Canada is due to lower comorbidity and a lower burden of acute onset end-stage renal disease at the inception of dialysis therapy. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, as practiced in Canada in the 1990s, are associated with similar overall survival rates.     

Survival and development of cardiovascular disease by modality of treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Patients undergoing dialysis are at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD) on survival and the risk of developing de novo CVD. Of the 4191 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who started renal replacement treatment (RRT) in Lombardy between 1994 and 1997, 4064 (who were on dialysis 30 d after the start of RRT) were considered for survival analysis: 2772 were on HD (mean age 60.9 yr; 21.2% diabetic) and 1292 on PD (mean age 63.6 yr; 16% diabetic). The 3120 patients who were free of CVD at the start of RRT were included in the analysis of the risk of developing de novo CVD. HD and PD were compared by use of a Cox-regression proportional hazard model, stratified by diabetic status; the explanatory covariates were age and gender. The death rate was 13.3 per 100 patient-years (13.0 on HD and 13.9 on PD); 197 (6.3%) of the 3120 patients included in the CVD analysis developed de novo CVD (128 on HD and 69 on PD). After adjustment for age, gender, and established CVD and stratification by diabetic status, there was no significant between-treatment difference in 4-yr survival (relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.06). The risk of de novo CVD did not differ significantly by treatment modality (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.43). The risk of mortality and de novo CVD for new patients with ESRD assigned to HD or PD was similar in Lombardy in the period 1994 through 1997.     

Nutritional status over time in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Malnutrition is a risk factor for mortality in the dialysis population. So far, prospective studies comparing the time course of nutritional status in new hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients have not been published. The aims of this study were to compare the time course of nutritional status in patients who were starting HD or PD and to identify the baseline determinants of that time course. In this prospective multicenter cohort study, data were collected from 3 (baseline) to 24 mo after the start of dialysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to establish the time course of nutritional status. Differences were adjusted for baseline characteristics. A total of 250 consecutive new patients were included: 132 started on HD, and 118 started on PD. A univariate analysis demonstrated a decrease in serum albumin (SA) in patients who started on HD and an increase in patients who started on PD. Body fat increased in PD; LBM did not change. The protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance normalized to ideal weight decreased in PD after 1 yr. In a multivariate analysis, SA at 2 yr was 2.0 g/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 3.8) higher in patients who started on PD compared with patients who started on HD. The increase in body fat was 3.2 kg (95% CI, 1.6 to 4.9) higher in women who started on PD than in others. Patients who had diabetes gained 2.3 kg (95% CI, 0.6 to 4.1) more fat than patients who did not have diabetes. Kt/V(urea) did not affect the time course of nutritional status, but a higher Kt(urea) was associated with a higher SA at 24 mo. Nutritional status at the start of dialysis, gender, and diabetic status might be considered in making the choice for dialysis modality. Furthermore, providing a higher Kt(urea) may improve protein metabolism.     

Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with all forms of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) was performed to assess their comparative clinical effectiveness. METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, were searched for relevant RCTs. Analysis was by a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Three trials (139 patients) were identified. APD when compared to CAPD was found to have significantly lower peritonitis rates (two trials, 107 patients, rate ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83) and hospitalization rates (one trial, 82 patients, rate ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.93) but not exit-site infection rates (two trials, 107 patients, rate ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.56-1.76). However no differences were detected between APD and CAPD in respect to risk of mortality (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.51-4.37), peritonitis (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50-1.11), switching from the original peritoneal dialysis (PD) modality to a different dialysis modality including an alternative form of PD (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-1.02), PD catheter removal (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27-1.48) and hospital admissions (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.43-2.17). Patients on APD were found to have significantly more time for work, family and social activities. CONCLUSIONS: APD appears to be more beneficial than CAPD, in terms of reducing peritonitis rates and with respect to certain social issues that impact on patients' quality of life. Further, adequately powered trials are required to confirm the benefits for APD found in this review and detect differences with respect to other clinically important outcomes that may have been missed by the trials included in this review due to their small size and short follow-up periods.     

Comparison of cognitive function between patients with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Objective To evaluate whether dialysis modality will affect cognitive function in dialysis population. Methods This was a cross-sectional study. Chronic dialysis patients in our center was screened from July 2013 to July 2014. All of the subjects received brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination and comprehensive cognitive function evaluation. Results A total of 189 chronic dialysis patients were enrolled in this study, 122 cases on hemodialysis (HD) and 67 cases on peritoneal dialysis (PD). There was no significant difference in age between HD and PD groups [(56.4±13.2) years vs (56.4±16.1) years, t=0.004, P=0.997]. The dialysis vintage and serum albumin of HD patients was higher than those of PD patients[58.0(16.8, 107.5) months vs 31.0(7.0, 67.0) months, Z=-3.490, P＜0.001; (39.6±3.9) g/L vs (35.3±3.8) g/L, t=7.328，P＜0.001, respectively]. The prevalence of cerebral small vessel diseases (CSVDs) was comparable between HD and PD groups (all P＞0.05). Compared with HD patients, PD patients presented a 11.90-fold risk of immediate memory impairment (95%CI 1.40-101.08, P=0.023) and a 6.18-fold risk of long-delayed memory impairment (95%CI 2.12-18.05, P=0.001). After adjusting for age, educational lever, dialysis vintage, serum creatinine, and CSVDs, the influence of dialysis modality on memory still worked. PD patients presented a 43% risk of executive function impairment of HD patients (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.17-1.04, P=0.061). Conclusions HD patients manifested better memory than PD patients, while PD probably performed better in executive function than HD patients. There was no significant difference in language function between the two groups. The difference in cognitive function may not be related to CSVDs.     

Effects of pre-transplant dialysis modality on early outcome of kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death

Objective To compare the influence of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) on early outcome of patients underwent kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD). Methods Patients admitted in the First People's Hospital of Foshan with DCD kidney transplant from January 1st, 2011 to June 30th, 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Recipients were grouped into HD group (n=61) and PD group (n=28) according to their pre-transplant dialysis modality. Their short-term outcomes after DCD kidney transplant were compared, including recovery of renal function, short-term complications and laboratory data. Results Patients had longer dialysis duration and lower hemoglobin, serum albumin and phosphorus in PD group than those in HD group (all P＜0.05), but no significant difference shown in age, gender, body mass index, primary disease, blood pressure, and hepatitis B infection (all P＞0.05). HD patients with 6.00(4.00, 11.00) d recovery time of renal function, 18.00(17.00, 21.50) d hospital time, had 24.59% the delayed graft function (DGF), 3.28% acute rejection and 16.39% infection during hospitalization. While for PD patients the recovery time of renal function was 4.00(3.75, 7.00) d; hospital time was 19.00(15.00, 21.75) d; the incidence rate of DGF was 14.29%; acute rejection was 3.57%; and infection during hospitalization reached 17.86%. Above indexes were not significantly different between HD and PD groups (all P＞0.05). Repeated measure ments showed that, compared with those before transplant surgery, after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months HD and PD groups had decreased creatinine and phosphorus, and increased hemoglobinserum albumin and calcium; Serum albumin and calcium were different between the two groups (P＜0.001, P=0.040), whereas creatinine, hemoglobin and phosphorus did not show difference (all P＜0.05). After transplantation the trends of creatinine, hemoglobin, calcium and phosphorus were not different between the two groups (P values were 0.295, 0.310, 0.501 and 0.063, respectively). Conclusions No significant difference of the recovery regarding renal function, anemia, nutrition status and mineral metabolites was found between pre-transplant HD and PD modality in patients who underwent DCD kidney transplantations.     

Comparison and survival of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the elderly

Comparisons of clinical outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients have been marked by inconsistent results depending on the population studied and the methods used. In order to address this limitation of previous U.S. studies and to more specifically evaluate the higher-risk elderly population, we undertook a study of Medicare patients > or =67 years of age and assessed the comorbidity before they entered end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treatment. We then evaluated their survival outcomes at 6 month intervals in the follow-up period. In order to adequately assess the comorbidity we employed the Charlson comorbidity index and applied it to the comorbidity of the ESRD population up to 2 years before ESRD to characterize conditions from the start of ESRD treatment. We also counted inpatient hospital days in the 2 years prior to initiation of ESRD therapy as a marker of severity of disease. These two determinants of comorbidity were used to adjust the analysis along with other demographic and laboratory data. In the diabetic population, HD patients are shown to have a decreased risk of death, with the decrease ranging from 8% [relative risk (RR) (HD:PD) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.90] at month 6 to 54% [RR (HD:PD) 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.70] at month 48. In the nondiabetic population, HD patients are shown to have a 17% [RR (HD:PD) 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28] increased risk of death in the first 6 months, and a decreased risk of death from months 6 to 48, a decrease ranging from 17% to 34%. Relative risks were significantly different from 1.0 at all intervals. These overall findings suggest that in the elderly population in the United States treated with PD had outcomes that were significantly worse than their HD patient counterparts, even after adjusting basic patient demographics, the comorbidity index, severity of disease with hospital days, demographics, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the time of start of dialysis.     

Dialysis as a bridge therapy to renal transplantation: comparison of graft outcomes according to mode of dialysis treatment

Background

Renal transplantation is the ideal renal replacement therapy in patients with end-stage renal disease. It was unclear whether a difference in dialysis modality influences outcomes after kidney transplantation. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of dialysis modality.

Methods

We compared various clinical and laboratory parameters of 70 peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 180 hemodialysis (HD) patients (n = 250), including 91 females and an overall age 36.7 ± 9.7 years who underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2008 to evaluate factors affecting delayed graft function (DGF) and of transplant graft failure.

Results

Overall graft survival was 82% at 3 and 75% at 5 years. Among HD patients, 16% displayed DGF, versus 12% of PD patients. Multivariate analysis showed that factors affecting DGF were: mode of dialysis (relative risk [RR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-1.43; P < .01); parathyroid hormone (RR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.30-0.34, P < .05), C-reative protein (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.09; P < .05), hemoglobin levels (RR = .75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.79; P < .05). At 3 and 5 years follow-up, PD patients' showed fewer graft failures than HD patients (14% vs 20%; P < .05 and 17% vs 28%; P < .05).

Conclusion

Early graft function rates were better for PD than for HD patients. Inflammation and anemia should be carefully investigated and corrected to achieve better graft function.     

Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2

Various studies indicate that fair comparisons of mortality rates between hemodialysis (HD) patients and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are difficult because of differences in patient characteristics, because of nonconstant relative risks of death (RR), and because the survival times of patients who switch treatment modalities can be censored in different ways. The differences in mortality rates between HD and PD patients were investigated in an analysis in which these potential sources of bias were taken into account. The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis is a multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study in which new patients with ESRD are monitored until transplantation or death. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the mortality data according to treatment modality (HD, n = 742; PD, n = 480). No statistically significant differences in adjusted mortality rates between HD and PD patients were observed during the first 2 yr of dialysis. In the years thereafter, increases in mortality rates for PD patients and resulting decreases in RR in favor of HD were observed (e.g., months 24 to 36, adjusted RR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.91). This tendency was observed especially among patients >/=60 yr of age and was not influenced by the censoring strategy. These results suggest that long-term use of PD, especially among elderly patients, is associated with increases in mortality rates. Further analyses are required to determine the potential role of dialysis adequacy in the observed long-term differences in mortality rates between HD and PD patients and to establish the possible survival benefits for PD patients who switch to HD in time.     

Chronic dialysis in children and adolescents

 The 1996 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) summarizes data submitted from 130 centers on 2,208 patients in whom 2,787 independent courses of dialysis were performed between 1 January 1992 and 16 January 1996. Approximately two-thirds of the dialysis population were maintained on peritoneal dialysis (PD), with automated PD remaining the preferred modality. There were 964 episodes of peritonitis in 1,018 patient years, yielding an overall peritonitis rate of 1 episode every 13 patient months. More PD patients attended school full time than hemodialysis (HD) patients at baseline (77% vs. 45%), which continued at 6, 12, and 24 months of followup. There were fewer Hispanic patients who were full-time students, whether on HD or PD, compared with white or black patients; 18% of Hispanic patients did not attend school, even though they were medically capable. The majority of dialysis courses terminated due to transplantation (54%), with change in dialysis modality the next most-common reason (28%). Early dialysis termination for any reason was seen more often in HD than PD (40% vs. 23% at 6 months), but by 24 months similar percentages of PD and HD courses had been terminated (75% HD, 72% PD). The most-common PD access was a Tenckhoff catheter with a single cuff, a straight tunnel and lateral exit site. The majority of HD accesses were external percutaneous catheters, with the sublcavian vein the most-common site. Erythropoietin was administered in 93% of HD and PD patients at 24 months. Received: 27 January 1998 / Revised: 16 July 1998 / Accepted: 22 July 1998     

Survival analysis of pediatric dialysis patients in Taiwan

Aim: The long‐term survival of Taiwanese children with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) has not been reported before. This study aimed to determine the long‐term survival, mortality hazards and causes of death in paediatric patients receiving dialysis. Methods: Paediatric patients (aged 19 years and younger) with incident ESRD who were reported to the Taiwan Renal Registry from 1995 to 2004 were included. A total of 319 haemodialysis (HD) and 156 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients formed the database. After stratification by dialysis modality, multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards model was constructed with age, sex and co‐morbidity as predictive variables. Results: The annual paediatric ESRD incidence rate was 8.12 per million of age‐related populations. The overall 1‐, 5‐, and 10‐year survival rates for PD patients were 98.1%, 88.0% and 68.4%, respectively, and were 96.9%, 87.3% and 78.5% for HD patients. The survival analysis showed no significant difference between HD and PD (P = 0.4878). Using ‘15–19 years’ as a reference group, the relative risk (RR) of the youngest group (0–4 years) was 6.60 (95% CI: 2.50–17.38) for HD, and 5.03 (95% CI: 1.23–20.67) for PD. The death rate was 24.66 per 1000 dialysis patient‐years. The three major causes of death were infection (23.4%), cardiovascular disease (13.0%) and cerebrovascular disease (10.4%). Hemorrhagic stroke (87.5%) was the main type of foetal cerebrovascular accident. Conclusion: We conclude that there was no significant difference of paediatric ESRD patient survival between HD and PD treatment in Taiwan. The older paediatric ESRD patients had better survival than younger patients.     

Mineral metabolism and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk: peritoneal dialysis patients compared with haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: The K/DOQI guideline for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease is predominantly based on studies in haemodialysis (HD) patients. However, in clinical practice, this guideline is also applied to peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. To validate the implementation of this guideline in PD patients, we evaluated the associations between plasma concentrations outside the K/DOQI-targets and the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in incident PD patients compared with HD patients. METHODS: In a large prospective multicentre study in the Netherlands (The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis, NECOSAD), we included patients starting PD or HD between 1997 and 2004. Relative risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were estimated using time-dependent Cox regression modelling. RESULTS: We included 586 PD patients with mean age 52 +/- 15 years (66% males) and 1043 HD patients with mean age 63 +/- 14 years (58% males). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was the reason for hospitalization in 102 PD and 271 HD patients. In HD patients, the relative risk of CVD-related hospitalization increased with elevated plasma calcium concentrations (hazard ratio: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.9). Cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher for phosphorus concentrations above the K/DOQI-threshold in PD (2.4; 95% CI: 1.3-4.2) and HD patients (1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), and for elevated Ca x P in PD (2.2; 95% CI: 1.3-3.8) and HD patients (1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma calcium concentrations above the K/DOQI-threshold increase the relative risk of CVD-related hospitalization in HD patients. Associations with cardiovascular mortality were more pronounced. Both in PD and HD patients with elevated plasma phosphorus and Ca x P concentrations, the cardiovascular mortality risk is increased. Therefore, it seems appropriate to adopt the current guideline in PD patients.     

Survival and morbidity of HIV patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: one center’s experience and review of the literature

Background Controversy continues concerning the morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected ESRD patients on the two dialysis options. This article presents our experience with complications and survival rate among our HIV-infected ESRD patients on peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. We reviewed the literature on this subject. Methods The charts of seven and eight HIV-infected ESRD patients on peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis respectively, between January 1989 and November 2004, were reviewed retrospectively for specific clinical and demographic data. Their survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Total follow-up of HIV-infected PD and HD patients was 248.3 and 207 patient months, respectively. There was no significant difference in hospitalization rate between HIV-infected PD and HD patients (1.01 and 1.39 admission/year, respectively, P = NS). Survival of HIV-infected patients on PD at one, two and three years was 100, 83, and 50%, and for HD patients was 75, 33, and 33%, respectively. HIV-infected patients on HD had more prevalent advanced HIV disease. Two out of seven PD patients were on PD for more than five years and one of the HD patients was on that form of dialysis for more than nine years. Median survival of patients with advanced (Stage IV) AIDS (both HD and PD) was 15.1 months (range 1.6–17.3) while this value for non-advanced (Stage II, III) patients was 61.2 months (range 6.8–116.6). Conclusion Type of renal replacement therapy does not have a significant effect on the morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected ESRD patients. Survival is worse in patients with advanced HIV disease. Both dialysis options provide similar results in HIV patients; hence, the choice of dialysis modality should be based on patient’s preference and social conditions.