Experience with multiple approaches to the prenatal diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome: amniotic fluid, chorionic villi, fetal blood and molecular methods

We have had experience with 160 prenatal diagnosis cases for the fragile X syndrome [fra(X)] or Martin-Bell Syndrome. In 140, amniotic fluid was utilized; 98 had a documented family history of fra(X). The 94 completed cases included 4 no growth; 56 males of which 7 were fra(X)-positive and 2 false-negative; 38 females of which 5 were fra(X) positive. There was no fra(X) positive result when a family history of mental retardation was not documented as fra(X). Molecular methods (RFLPs) were utilized in 10 amniotic fluid and 5 chorionic villus specimens (CVS). Percutaneous umbilical blood sampling was used in 2 negative cases and 1 fra(X) positive case because of timing, tissue culture failure or confirmation of another method. CVS were received in 13 cases, and RFLPs were utilized in 5 of the CVS cases. There was no positive fra(X) CVS chromosome result in males, 1 positive result in a female, but 2 false negatives were detected by RFLPs. On the basis of the results, it can be concluded that cytogenetic and molecular methods are complementary and best used together and that multiple approaches can enhance the efficiency and reliability of fra(X) prenatal diagnosis.     

Fragile X families in a northern Swedish county: a genealogical study of possibly affected individuals in the nineteenth century

Most studies of fragile X [fra(X)] families are able to document mental impairment only by family history. Using Swedish historical archives and the unique parish catechetical meeting records it is possible to document qualitative phenomena such as literacy for over 100 years. In this way it was possible to identify 7 individuals with mental retardation living in the nineteenth century in an earlier published fra(X) pedigree. Four of them were female. At the present time another 4 severely mentally retarded females with the fra(X) syndrome have been diagnosed in this family. The high prevalence of mentally retarded females might indicate a variant form of the fra(X) syndrome in this family.     

Cytogenetic guidelines for fragile X studies tested in routine practice.

Several organizations have proposed guidelines for fra(X) studies on peripheral blood lymphocytes. To evaluate these guidelines, we reviewed 1,033 consecutive specimens referred for fra(X) analysis. Each specimen was cultured with medium 199 and RPMI 1640 with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine or excess thymidine. The karyotype and expression of fra(X) were established from 20 GTL- or QFQ-banded cells and by screening of up to 130 more banded cells. We found anomalies other than fra(X) in 37 (3.6%) of the patients. We found 4% or more fra(X) cells in 38 (3.7%) cases from 36 unrelated families, including 33 (3.9%) of 850 males and 5 (2.7%) of 183 females. Another 4 females had 1 to 3% fra(X) cells. Six specimens were fra(X)-positive in only one stress system, and 32 were positive in 2 systems. To find the first 2 fra(X) cells in males, we needed to study up to 36 cells in 31 cases, 50 in one case, and 57 in another. To find the first 2 fra(X) cells in females, we needed to study up to 17 cells in 4 cases and 57 in another. A strong family history of fra(X) occurred in 5 patients, and each one was fra(X)-positive. Some manifestations of the fragile X syndrome occurred in 507 cases, 17 (3%) of which were fra(X)-positive. Abnormalities considered unlikely to be the fragile X syndrome occurred in 103 cases, 3 (3%) of which were fra(X)-positive. Use of chromosome breakage and fra(3)(p14) as quality control indicators of the fra(X) stress systems was found to be unreliable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cytogenetic guidelines for fragile X studies tested in routine practice

Several organizations have proposed guidelines for fra(X) studies on peripheral blood lymphocytes. To evaluate these guidelines, we reviewed 1,033 consecutive specimens referred for fra(X) analysis. Each specimen was cultured with medium 199 and RPMI 1640 with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine or excess thymidine. The karyotype and expression of fra(X) were established from 20 GTL- or QFQ-banded cells and by screening of up to 130 more banded cells. We found anomalies other than fra(X) in 37 (3.6%) of the patients. We found 4% or more fra(X) cells in 38 (3.7%) cases from 36 unrelated families, including 33 (3.9%) of 850 males and 5 (2.7%) of 183 females. Another 4 females had 1 to 3% fra(X) cells. Six specimens were fra(X)-positive in only one stress system, and 32 were positive in 2 systems. To find the first 2 fra(X) cells in males, we needed to study up to 36 cells in 31 cases, 50 in one case, and 57 in another. To find the first 2 fra(X) cells in females, we needed to study up to 17 cells in 4 cases and 57 in another. A strong family history of fra(X) occurred in 5 patients, and each one was fra(X)-positive. Some manifestations of the fragile X syndrome occurred in 507 cases, 17 (3%) of which were fra(X)-positive. Abnormalities considered unlikely to be the fragile X syndrome occurred in 103 cases, 3 (3%) of which were fra(X)-positive. Use of chromosome breakage and fra(3)(p14) as quality control indicators of the fra(X) stress systems was found to be unreliable. Our findings support most of the proposed guidelines for fra(X) studies but indicate a need for modifications of others. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome in amniotic fluid: calculation of accuracy.

We have completed over 350 prenatal diagnoses for the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome using amniotic fluid, chorion villus specimen (CVS), fetal blood sampling and molecular methods. A total of 300 amniotic fluid specimens have been received for prenatal diagnosis of the fra(X) syndrome. There was a documented family history of fra(X) in 170/300 amniotic fluid cases, and 23/170 were correctly identified as cytogenetically fra(X) positive (16 male; 7 female). Three males were false-negative, and one female was fra(X) negative but identified as a probable carrier by RFLPs. No fra(X) positive or false-negative results were found in the absence of a fra(X) family history. Because the a priori risk for the fra(X) syndrome for each pregnancy was different and widely variable, the determination of the accuracy of the prenatal diagnosis results requires a consideration of these variables. On this basis, the calculated accuracy of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis for the fra(X) syndrome is approximately 97%. This accuracy can be improved further with the simultaneous use of molecular methods, especially in view of recent developments.     

The fragile X syndrome: no evidence for any recent mutations.

Fragile X (fra(X)) syndrome, the most common form of familial mental retardation, is caused by heritable unstable DNA composed of CGG repeats. As reproductive fitness of fra(X) patients is severely compromised, a high mutation rate has been proposed to explain the high prevalence. However, we have been unable to show any new mutation for 84 probands referred to us to date. We show here the same fra(X) gene in five fra(X) probands with common ancestors married in 1747. The lack of new fra(X) mutations implies that there must be many more fra(X) gene carriers in the population than previously realised. As it is now possible to detect asymptomatic fra(X) gene carriers by DNA analysis, extended family studies for any new proband are recommended. A family illustrating the importance of fra(X) carriership determination is reported.     

Fragile X screening program in New York State

Most fragile X [fra(X)] males in New York State have not been identified. Hence, a large number of female relatives are unaware of their risks for having an affected child. A program was established in New York State in 1987 to screen for the fra(X) syndrome in mentally retarded males with living relatives. The goal of the program is to identify affected males and inform their families about the diagnosis. In this way relatives would be able to assess their risks for having a fra(X) male. In order to identify the males a screening form was developed to assess 10 features which included physical characteristics, behavior, and family history. Males who exhibited at least 5 of these manifestations were selected for cytogenetic analysis. Any male who had macroorchidism or a family history of mental retardation was also included. A total of 995 males have been screened of which 352 (35%) were selected for cytogenetic analyses. Seventeen (10.5%) of the 161 completed studies were positive for fra(X). A large number of possible female carriers were identified in the families of the propositi. This program identifies fra(X) males in a population of the mentally retarded for whom there had been no previous diagnosis. By using a two-step procedure, it is possible to screen a large population of the mentally retarded for fra(X) without testing each male cytogenetically.     

Psychiatric disability associated with the fragile X chromosome

Fragile X (or Martin-Bell) syndrome, a common, genetic, mental retardation disorder is increasingly being recognized as a major cause of cognitive disability and psychiatric illness in boys. Here, we present a study in which relatives in 4 generations of a large family with the fra(X) chromosome were given comprehensive psychiatric evaluations in order to further describe the psychopathology associated with this condition. Three of 4 males with the fra(X) chromosome were found to have autistic behavior. An adult fra(X) male had a chronic schizoaffective disorder and mental retardation. In female relatives, a relationship was found between the fra(X) carrier status and psychopathology including schizoaffective and major affective disorders.     

Transmission of the fra(X) haplotype from three nonpenetrant brothers to their affected grandsons.

We report on a family showing transmission of the fra(X) gene by 3 nonpenetrant, fra(X) negative, normally intelligent, full and half-brothers to their affected grandsons. The mothers of the affected boys are obligate carriers, fra(X) negative, and of normal intelligence. This family illustrates the "Sherman Paradox" and is compatible with the predictions of the Laird X-inactivation imprinting model. In addition, molecular and/or cytogenetic studies have enabled at-risk relatives to learn more about their carrier fra(X) status and have allowed for more accurate genetic counselling.     

Transmission of the fra(X) haplotype from three nonpenetrant brothers to their affected grandsons

We report on a family showing transmission of the fra(X) gene by 3 nonpenetrant, fra(X) negative, normally intelligent, full and half-brothers to their affected grandsons. The mothers of the affected boys are obligate carriers, fra(X) negative, and of normal intelligence. This family illustrates the “Sherman Paradox” and is compatible with the predictions of the Laird X-inactivation imprinting model. In addition molecular and/or cytogenetic studies have enabled at-risk relatives to learn more about their carrier fra(X) status and have allowed for more accurate genetic counselling. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Association of the Robin sequence with the fragile X syndrome

We report on 4 individuals with the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome and the Robin sequence (or elements of that sequence). To our knowledge, this association has been described in only one other boy. However, males with the fra(X) syndrome have been reported to have an increased incidence of cleft palate. We recommend that children with a cleft palate or the Robin sequence be assessed for developmental delays and a family history of mental retardation. The fra(X) syndrome may be one of the genetic causes of the Robin sequence and, when indicated, children with the sequence should be tested for fra(X).     

Cytogenetically negative, linkage positive "fragile X" syndrome.

We investigated the family of a 3-year-old boy with manifestations of the Martin-Bell syndrome (MBS). His 17-year-old cousin had classic manifestations of MBS and was fragile X [fra(X)] positive. The 3-year-old boy was fra(X) negative. Linkage analysis with probes flanking the fra(X) region indicated that these cousins had the same X chromosome inherited from a normal grandfather. The DNA and cytogenetic analyses suggest that limitations in the ability to detect the fra(X) mutation cytogenetically may be responsible for fra(X)-negative MBS; or, alternatively, that a crossover occurred between a locus determining the MBS phenotype and one determining fra(X) expression.     

Linkage in fragile X families of three distal flanking markers: ST14, DX13, and F8.

The use of linked DNA markers and linkage analysis in the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome allows for improved genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. In order to provide the most accurate information, it is important to determine the order and location and position of flanking markers. Conflicting results have been reported for the order of 3 DNA markers distal to the fra(X) locus. We analyzed the linkage relationships of the distal markers ST14 (DXS52), DX13 (DXS15), and F8 (F8C) in 102 fra(X) families. The results indicated that the 3 DNA markers were closely linked to one another and mapped approximately 11 to 15% recombination units away from the fra(X) locus. The most likely order was fra(X)-DXS52-DXS15-F8. The order fra(X)-DXS52-F8 and 728 times more likely than the order fra(X)-F8-DXS52. One family showed a probable double recombinant: in one individual there was recombination between fra(X)-DXS52 and between DXS52-F8. The low probability of this occurring, 0.3%, raises the possibility of an alternate chromosome arrangement or an unusual recombinant mechanism in some individuals.     

Association of the Robin sequence with the fragile X syndrome.

We report on 4 individuals with the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome and the Robin sequence (or elements of that sequence). To our knowledge, this association has been described in only one other boy. However, males with the fra(X) syndrome have been reported to have an increased incidence of cleft palate. We recommend that children with a cleft palate or the Robin sequence be assessed for developmental delays and a family history of mental retardation. The fra(X) syndrome may be one of the genetic causes of the Robin sequence and, when indicated, children with the sequence should be tested for fra(X).     

Three families with high expression of a fragile site at Xq27.3, lack of anomalies at the FMR-1 CpG island, and no clear phenotypic association.

We report on 3 families where the presence and segregation at high frequency of a fragile Xq27.3 site is not associated with the mutations and methylation anomalies typically seen in the fragile X [Fra(X)] syndrome. In one family, a folate insensitive fragile site was associated with Robin sequence in the propositus. In a second family a fra(X) negative mother has two fra(X) positive sons (one mentally retarded and the other newborn). The third family presents very high expression of a folate sensitive site, unlinked to mental retardation, and was described previously by Voelckel et al. [1989]. The fragile sites in these or similar families recently described must be different from the one associated with the fra(X) syndrome. Their association with a clinical phenotype or with mental retardation is certainly not consistent, and may represent an ascertainment bias. However, the relatively high frequency with which they have been found among previously diagnosed fra(X) families suggests that, at least in some cases, the association with mental impairment may be significant. In two families reported up to now, a male with high expression of such variant fra(X) site failed to transmit it to his daughter, which may reflect an imprinting effect. Previously diagnosed families should be reinvestigated before direct DNA analysis is used for prenatal or carrier diagnosis of the fra(X) syndrome.     

Fragile X and autism: a multicenter survey

We screened 183 autistic males for the fra(X) and found 24 (13.1%) to be positive. Adding the subjects of this study to those of 11 other surveys, of which 6 were positive and 5 were negative, a total of 614 autistic males have been screened. Overall 47 (7.7%) were positive. Based on this estimate and the prevalence of autism and fra(X), we estimate that 12.3% of fra(X) males are autistic. We have found that 17.3% of our fra(X) males were autistic and overall a 21.2% frequency has been reported, these higher figures are most likely due to biases in age and ascertainment. With an overall 7.7% frequency of fra(X) among autistic males and an estimated 12.3% of autism among fra(X) males, we conclude there is likely to be a significant association of fra(X) with autism. Because fra(X) appears to be the single most common cause of the condition, chromosomal testing is recommended for any autistic person with undiagnosed etiology.     

Investigation of the twinning rate in families with the fragile X syndrome

An excess of twins in families with the Martin-Bell or fra(X) syndrome was noted previously in one family study [Fryns, 1986]. We tried to confirm this observation in a second large sample of families from a different population. We calculated the number of twin births among the total number of live births of known obligate carriers found in fra(X) families ascertained in New South Wales, Australia. We only included births of known sex and excluded triplets. There were 5 male pairs, 3 female pairs and 9 unlike sex pairs of twins born among 752 live births. Thus the twining rate was 1/44 per live birth. We compared this rate to that found in two different types of individuals: 1) the rate of 1/96 which was obtained from the 1985 vital statistics for New South Wales, and 2) the rate 1/75 obtained from a sample of live births of obligate carriers with hemophilia A. The increase in twinning among heterozygotes with the fra(X) was highly significant when compared to the census data (p less than 0.001). However, it was not significantly different from that in the hemophilia data (p less than 0.05) which were collected in the same way as in the fra(X) families.     

Immunologic studies of three family members with the immunodeficiency with hyper-IgM syndrome

We report the results of immunologic studies in a family in which the father (III-5) and his two daughters (IV-7 and IV-8) had the hyper-IgM syndrome (IHIS). Repeated immunoglobulin levels done on III-5 showed a typical IHIS pattern: low IgG, traces of IgA, and high IgM. IV-7, who also had stage IIA Hodgkin's disease, had a similar pattern except after irradiation therapy to sites of disease, when IgM dropped to normal range while IgG and IgA remained low. IV-8, on the other hand, had normal IgG and IgA and moderately elevated IgM until age 18 months, when she gradually developed the IHIS pattern. All three patients had normal numbers of B cells (sIg) and of T cells, although IV-7 had increased suppression. Finally, all three patients shared the A3,B7 haplotype and none was blood type O. IHIS is not necessarily X linked, is not associated with blood type O, and appears to be heterogeneous even within the same family. Inheritance in this family is apparently autosomal dominant and the father may represent a new mutation.