The reformulation of Amphotericin B for oral administration to treat systemic fungal infections and visceral leishmaniasis

Amphotericin B (AmB) is a parenterally administered broad-spectrum antifungal and leishmanicidal drug that has been on the market for over sixty years. Unfortunately, significant infusion-related side effects and renal toxicity often accompany treatment, limiting its clinical applications. Lipid-based formulations have somewhat ameliorated the associated toxicity, but the increased cost of formulations restricts widespread use. AmB is amphipathic and exhibits low solubility and permeability, resulting in negligible absorption when administered orally. Advances in drug delivery systems have overcome some of the solubility issues that prevent oral bioavailability and new formulations are currently in development. The existence of an effective, safe and inexpensive oral formulation of amphotericin B would have significant applications for the treatment of disseminated fungal infections and would dramatically expand access to treatment of visceral leishmaniasis by introducing a readily available highly tolerated oral formulation of a drug with known efficacy.     

Amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC; Abelcet^®, Enzon Pharmaceuticals) has become the dominant marketed lipid amphotericin B compound to emerge since the approval of these agents from the mid-1990s onwards. This agent is a 1:1 combination of amphotericin B and a lipid moiety consisting of dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyrisoyl phosphatidylcholine, which exists in a ribbon-like molecular structure. ABLC undergoes rapid reticuloendothelial uptake from the circulation and achieves significantly higher tissue concentrations in the liver, spleen and lung compared to comparably dosed conventional amphotericin B. ABLC is approved by the FDA for all mycoses in amphotericin B-intolerant or -refractory infection. Randomised, controlled trials of amphotericin B have shown comparable efficacy in candidiasis and an improved outcome in invasive aspergillosis versus historical controls. ABLC has demonstrated a reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity and infusion reactions versus amphotericin B. Comparative studies against other lipid formulations are quite limited and have shown variable differences in infusion toxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and clinical efficacy. Postapproval experience has shown substantial efficacy for less common mycotic pathogens including zygomycosis. The precise position of ABLC versus both other lipid formulations and expanding formulary of new antifungal agents is in flux. Future studies which examine its clinical efficacy, role in combination therapy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness in these complex patients are needed.     

Amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC; Abelcet, Enzon Pharmaceuticals) has become the dominant marketed lipid amphotericin B compound to emerge since the approval of these agents from the mid-1990s onwards. This agent is a 1:1 combination of amphotericin B and a lipid moiety consisting of dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyrisoyl phosphatidylcholine, which exists in a ribbon-like molecular structure. ABLC undergoes rapid reticuloendothelial uptake from the circulation and achieves significantly higher tissue concentrations in the liver, spleen and lung compared to comparably dosed conventional amphotericin B. ABLC is approved by the FDA for all mycoses in amphotericin B-intolerant or -refractory infection. Randomised, controlled trials of amphotericin B have shown comparable efficacy in candidiasis and an improved outcome in invasive aspergillosis versus historical controls. ABLC has demonstrated a reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity and infusion reactions versus amphotericin B. Comparative studies against other lipid formulations are quite limited and have shown variable differences in infusion toxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and clinical efficacy. Postapproval experience has shown substantial efficacy for less common mycotic pathogens including zygomycosis. The precise position of ABLC versus both other lipid formulations and expanding formulary of new antifungal agents is in flux. Future studies which examine its clinical efficacy, role in combination therapy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness in these complex patients are needed.     

Amphotericin B lipid complex in the management of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients

Invasive fungal infections are associated with a poor outcome and their incidence is rising. Amphotericin B has for a long time been the gold standard for treatment of these infections, but the conventional formulation is associated with a high incidence of adverse events. Lipid formulations of amphotericin, developed to overcome these drawbacks, are now routinely used in clinical practice for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) is prepared from amphotericin complexed to two phospholipids, a process that confers a number of important pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties compared with conventional amphotericin B. The results of retrospective observational studies and the analysis of databases, including the large Collaborative Exchange of Antifungal Research (CLEAR) database, have shown ABLC to be associated with response rates of up to about 80% in patients with confirmed fungal infections and around 60% in those treated empirically. Intranasal administration of ABLC for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients is safe and appears to be a promising treatment strategy for the future. ABLC is associated with a substantially lower incidence of nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin. Infusion-related reactions also occur less frequently than with conventional amphotericin and can be managed using premedication protocols. When direct and indirect costs are measured, ABLC appears to be less expensive than conventional amphotericin. The number of approved antifungal agents that are effective treatments for invasive fungal infections is increasing. However, lipid formulations of amphotericin, such as ABLC, are effective and well tolerated and remain the standard of care in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Treatment strategies such as intranasal administration for prophylaxis and combination therapy with newer agents are future directions for these agents.     

Amphotericin B molecular organization as an essential factor to improve activity/toxicity ratio in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis

An in vivo study has been performed in order to determine the influence of amphotericin B (AMB) molecular organization on the toxicity and activity of this drug in the treatment of experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Three formulations with similar composition but different drug molecular self-association in aqueous media were prepared. Acute toxicity was evaluated by injecting them in healthy hamsters. Sub-acute toxicity and efficacy were studied administering them to animals previously infected with Leishmania infantum. The preparation with drug molecules completely dissolved into monomers (formulation "C") and produced the highest acute toxicity. The formulation whose AMB molecules were disposed as non-water-soluble multi-aggregates (formulation "B") proved to provide the lowest acute toxicity. This formula also showed an improved activity, mainly in the liver, if compared with the third tested formulation containing AMB molecules disposed as smaller dimerical "water-soluble" aggregates (formulation "A"). As a conclusion, molecular aggregation in biological media should be an important factor to consider when researching or optimizing medicines containing AMB. The liberation of molecules as large dispersed non-water-soluble multi-aggregates seems to improve the narrow therapeutic margin attached to the use of this drug.     

A comparison of the activities of three amphotericin B lipid formulations against experimental visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis

The polyene antibiotic, amphotericin B, the gold standard for systemic fungal infections is also a recommended second line treatment for visceral, cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Acute toxicity has limited the use of amphotericin B but less toxic lipid formulations, AmBisome®, Amphocil™ and Abelcet®, have shown potential for the treatment of clinical visceral and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. This study compares the in vitro and in vivo anti-leishmanial activity of Fungizone and the three lipid formulations. AmBisome and Amphocil were more active (ED₅₀ values 0.3 and 0.7mg/kg, respectively) than Abelcet (ED₅₀ 2.7mg/kg) against L. donovani in a mouse model. Against L. major in vivo, AmBisome at a dose of 25mg/kg was the most successful at reducing lesion size, with Amphocil also showing activity while Abelcet was inactive. In the L. donovani — peritoneal macrophage (PEM) model Fungizone and Amphocil were significantly more active (ED₅₀ values 0.013 and 0.02 μg/ml, respectively) than AmBisome and Abelcet (ED₅₀ values 1.5 and 2.6 μg/ml). This trend was similar in the L. major — PEM model (Fungizone>Amphocil>AmBisome>Abelcet). THP-1 macrophages infected with L. donovani amastigotes showed a different profile with Amphocil=Abelcet>AmBisome>Fungizone. Differences could be due to the interaction of the formulations with the biological milieu and uptake into different cell types.     

Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis

The Leishmania donovani complex includes L. chagasi and L. infantum, and causes visceral leishmaniasis (VL), a disseminated and potentially fatal form of leishmaniasis. The treatment options for VL are limited. Pentavalent antimonials (Sb^v) are the first-line treatment options worldwide except for in Europe and Sb^v-unresponsive regions of India. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is the drug of choice in India, as are its lipid formulations in Europe. However, liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome^®, Gilead Sciences, Inc.) is the best antileishmanial formulation, but its prohibitive cost limits its use in endemic countries. Preferential pricing of AmBisome for patients with VL may provide hope for these underprivileged patients. Oral miltefosine and paromomycin are the other drugs that have been recently developed. Limited therapeutic options, the potential for development of resistance and serious toxicity associated with antileishmanial drugs necessitates a change in the treatment policy. A shift from monotherapy to multi-drug combinations of short courses delivered at no or affordable cost, through directly observed therapy, seems to be the only way to develop the treatment of this disease.     

Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis

The Leishmania donovani complex includes L. chagasi and L. infantum, and causes visceral leishmaniasis (VL), a disseminated and potentially fatal form of leishmaniasis. The treatment options for VL are limited. Pentavalent antimonials (Sbv) are the first-line treatment options worldwide except for in Europe and Sbv-unresponsive regions of India. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is the drug of choice in India, as are its lipid formulations in Europe. However, liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome, Gilead Sciences, Inc.) is the best antileishmanial formulation, but its prohibitive cost limits its use in endemic countries. Preferential pricing of AmBisome for patients with VL may provide hope for these underprivileged patients. Oral miltefosine and paromomycin are the other drugs that have been recently developed. Limited therapeutic options, the potential for development of resistance and serious toxicity associated with antileishmanial drugs necessitates a change in the treatment policy. A shift from monotherapy to multi-drug combinations of short courses delivered at no or affordable cost, through directly observed therapy, seems to be the only way to develop the treatment of this disease.     

Antileishmanial efficacy of amphotericin B bearing emulsomes against experimental visceral leishmaniasis

Amphotericin B (AmB) was formulated in trilaurin-based emulsomes (nanosize lipid particles) stabilized by soya phosphatidylcholine (PC), as a new delivery system for macrophage targeting for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Emulsomes were modified by coating them with macrophage-specific ligand (O-palmitoyl mannan, OPM). The antileishmanial activity of AmB-deoxycholate (AmB-Doc) and emulsome entrapped AmB was tested in vitro in Leishmania donovani infected macrophage-amastigote system (J774A.1 cells), which showed higher efficacy of OPM grafted AmB emulsomes (TLEs-OPM) over plain AmB emulsomes (TLEs) and AmB-Doc. The in vivo antileishmanial activity of the AmB (0.5 mg/kg) was tested in AmB-Doc, TLEs and TLEs-OPM forms against VL in L. donovani infected hamsters. Formulation TLEs-OPM eliminated intracellular amastigotes of L. donovani within splenic macrophages more efficiently (73.7 +/- 6.7% parasite inhibition) than the formulation TLEs (51.7 +/- 5.4% parasite inhibition) (P < 0.01) or AmB-Doc (30.4 +/- 4.8% parasite inhibition) (P < 0.001). Our results suggest that these newer formulations (plain and ligand appended emulsomes) are a promising alternative to the conventional AmB-Doc formulation for the treatment of VL.     

Amphotericin B lipid complex is efficacious in the treatment of Candida albicans biofilms using a model of catheter-associated Candida biofilms

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) against Candida albicans biofilms using a rabbit model of catheter-associated candidal biofilm. A clinical C. albicans isolate was allowed to form biofilms on catheters placed in vivo and was then exposed to lock therapy with ABLC (1.5mg, locked for 4h or 8h for 7 days). Untreated biofilms served as controls. Fungal loads on the proximal and distal sections of catheters were determined by counting colony-forming units (CFUs), whilst surface architecture of formed biofilms was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Studies revealed that all ABLC-treated catheters were sterilised and yielded 0 CFU (P相似文献   

Investigational drugs for visceral leishmaniasis

Introduction: The armamentarium of antileishmanial drugs is small. It is further being threatened by the development of resistance and decreasing sensitivity to the available drugs. The development of newer drugs is sorely needed.

Areas covered: The authors have based their review on a literature search performed using PubMed. The article specifically looks at investigational drugs, which have demonstrated, at the very least, in vitro and in vivo activities against the leishmania species that cause visceral leishmaniasis. Specifically, the authors review the nitroimidazole compound fexinidazole, which is one of the few drugs which have reached Phase II trials. The article also discusses the R enantiomer of (S)-PA-824, which has shown good antileishmanial activity. Finally, the article also highlights the many novel delivery systems and oral formulations of amphotericin B, which are both cheap and less toxic and are currently under investigation.

Expert opinion: Very few new drugs have reached the clinic for this neglected tropical disease and there is an urgent need for new efficacious therapeutics. The authors believe that support from public–private partnerships would help in enabling the prompt development of drug candidates that could potentially make the clinic.     

Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity

The frequency of fungal infections is increasing. Amphotericin B remains the anti-fungal drug of choice for most systemic infections, but a limiting factor for its use is the development of nephrotoxicity. Amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity is manifested as azotaemia, renal tubular acidosis, impaired renal concentrating ability and electrolyte abnormalities like hypokalaemia and sodium and magnesium wasting. All these abnormalities occur to varying degrees in almost all patients receiving the drug. Upon withdrawal of therapy renal function gradually returns to baseline, although in some instances permanent damage is sustained, especially when the cumulative dose exceeds 5g. Salt depletion enhances the development of nephrotoxicity. The mechanism of nephrotoxicity involves direct cell membrane actions to increase permeability, as well as indirect effects secondary to activation of intrarenal mechanisms (tubuloglomerular feedback) and/or release of mediators (thromboxane A2). The latter effects are presumably responsible for the observed acute decreases in renal blood flow and filtration rate, responses that are inhibited by several physiological and pharmacological interventions. Changes in intracellular calcium levels may also contribute to the observed effects. In the clinical situation, and in long term models of nephrotoxicity in the rat, salt loading protects against deterioration in renal function; recommendations are made for the optimisation of amphotericin B therapy by salt loading. New preparations of the drug, such as liposomal amphotericin B, may also prove useful in minimising nephrotoxicity while maintaining antifungal activity, but further research is needed with both salt loading and liposomal amphotericin B to confirm or deny their protective effect on kidney function.     

Amphotericin B lipid nanoemulsion aerosols for targeting peripheral respiratory airways via nebulization

Amphotericin B (AmB) lipid nanoemulsions were prepared and characterized and their suitability for pulmonary delivery via nebulization was evaluated. AmB nanoemulsions were prepared by sonicating and vortexing the drug with two commercially available lipid nanoemulsions: the Intralipid(?) or Clinoleic(?). Loading the nanoemulsions with the drug slightly increased the size of the lipid droplets and did not affect the zeta potential of the nanoemulsions. The loading efficiency of AmB was found to be 87.46±2.21% in the Intralipid(?) nanoemulsions and 80.7±0.70% in the Clinoleic(?) formulation. This respectively corresponded to 21.86mg and 20.19mg of AmB being successfully loaded in the nanoemulsions. On aerosolization using a Pari Sprint jet nebulizer, both nanoemulsions produced very high drug output which was approximately 90% for both formulations. Using the two-stage impinger, the Clinoleic(?) emulsion had higher fine particle fraction (FPF) than the Intralipid(?), since the Clinoleic(?) displayed higher deposition of AmB in the lower impinger stage (exceeding 80%), compared to 57% for the Intralipid(?). Overall, the ease of preparation of the AmB lipid nanoemulsions, along with their in vitro nebulization performance suggest that lipid nanoemulsions could be successful nanocarriers for delivery of AmB to the peripheral respiratory airways.     

Developments in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis

Background: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is one of the most neglected parasitic diseases causing large scale mortality and morbidity among the poorest of the poor in the Indian subcontinent and Africa. Objective: This review aims to describe the potential and the (lack of) current impact of newly developed treatments on the control of VL. It describes how the problem of an empty research pipeline is addressed, and discusses the emerging threat of incurable HIV/VL coinfection. Methods: The literature was searched for drugs used in VL. Conclusion: Research and development of VL drugs has received a financial boost but no new drugs are expected in the next 5 years. Only three new and highly effective treatments have been licensed in the past 10 years. These remain, however, largely inaccessible as VL control programs in the developing world are lacking. This is deserving of immediate and urgent attention, especially in the context of the rapidly expanding HIV/VL coinfection.     

HPLC法测定复方两性霉素B眼用凝胶的含量

目的建立同时测定复方两性霉素B眼用凝胶中两性霉素B和利福平含量的高效液相色谱法。方法采用Diamonsil C18柱（250mm&#215;4．6mm,5μm）,以0．005mol／L乙二胺四乙酸二钠-乙腈（65：35）为流动相,流速为1．0ml／min,检测波长为334nm,柱温为20℃。结果曲性霉素B的线性范围为4．816～48．16μg／ml,r=0．9999,平均回收率为99．3％,RSD=1．0％（n=9）;利福平的线性范围为1．739～17．39μg／ml,r=0．9999,平均回收率为99．4％,RSD=1．1％（n=9）。结论该方法操作简便,快速,结果准确,可适用于产品的质量控制。     

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal dispersion of a stable complex of amphotericin B with cholesteryl sulphate in a 1:1 proportion, forming uniform disk-shaped particles. ABCD is associated with less nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related adverse events are more frequent in patients receiving ABCD than in patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B deoxycholate. ABCD has been shown in a randomised, double-blind study, to be an effective alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia. ABCD is active in the treatment of invasive Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. infections in immunocompromised hosts, however most of the data supporting its use for these types of infections is derived from non-comparative open-label clinical trials of patient refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. ABCD is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients where renal impairment of unacceptable toxicity precludes the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate in effective doses, and in patients with invasive aspergillosis where prior amphotericin B deoxycholate therapy has failed. Two other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B, are available and, like ABCD, are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity as compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. The role of ABCD in comparison with these other lipid formulations of amphotericin B is discussed herein. High cost remains an issue with all lipid formulations of amphotericin B.