Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial

OBJECTIVE: Thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique (TmLRP-TT) is a transurethral procedure that uses thulium laser fiber to dissect whole prostatic lobes off the surgical capsule, similar to peeling a tangerine. To our knowledge we report the first prospective, randomized study comparing TmLRP-TT and standard TURP for symptomatic BPH. METHODS: From November 2004 to December 2005, 100 consecutive BPH patients were randomized for surgical treatment with TmLRP-TT (n=52) or TURP (n=48). All patients were preoperatively assessed with subjective symptoms score, International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire, and complete urodynamic evaluation. Preoperative and perioperative parameters at 1-, 6-, and 12-mo follow-up were also evaluated. All complications were recorded. RESULTS: TmLRP-TT was significantly superior to TURP in terms of catheterization time (45.7+/-25.8h vs. 87.4+/-33.8h, p<0.0001), hospital stay (115.1+/-25.5h vs. 161.1+/-33.8h, p<0.0001), and drop in hemoglobin (0.92+/-0.82 g/dl vs. 1.46+/-0.65 g/dl, p<0.001), whereas it required equivalent time to perform (46.3+/-16.2 vs. 50.4+/-20.7 min, p>0.05). TmLRP-TT and TURP resulted in a significant improvement from baseline in terms of subjective symptoms scoring and urodynamic finding, but no significant difference was found between the two groups. Late complications were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: TmLRP-TT is an almost bloodless procedure with high efficacy and little perioperative morbidity. TmLRP-TT is superior to TURP in safety and is as efficacious as TURP in 1-yr follow-up. It is a promising technology in the clinical practice field.     

Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: To report 3-yr follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: A total of 200 patients with urodynamic obstruction and a prostate volume of less than 100 cc were prospectively randomised and assigned to HoLEP or TURP. All patients were assessed preoperatively and followed at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 mo postoperatively. American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA SS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), and postvoid residual (PVR) [urine] volume were obtained at each follow-up. Perioperative data and postoperative outcome were compared. All complications were recorded. RESULTS: AUA SS were significantly better 2 yr postoperatively in the HoLEP group (1.7 vs. 3.9, p<0.0001) and similar at 3 yr (2.7 vs. 3.3, p=0.17). PVR volume was significantly better 2 yr (5.6 vs. 19.9 ml, p<0.001) and 3 yr (8.4 vs. 20.2 ml, p=0.012) postoperatively in HoLEP patients. Q(max) was similar in the HoLEP and TURP groups at 2 yr (28.0 vs. 29.1 ml/s, p=0.83) and at 3 yr (29.0 vs. 27.5 ml/s, p=0.41) postoperatively. Late complications consisted of urethral strictures, bladder-neck contractures, and BPH recurrence; reoperation rates were 7.2% in the HoLEP and 6.6% in the TURP group (p=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: After 2 and 3 yr of follow-up, HoLEP micturition outcomes compare favourably with TURP. Late complications are equally low. HoLEP may be a real alternative to TURP.     

Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 4-year minimum long-term followup

PURPOSE: It has previously been shown that holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP) is superior to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with regard to perioperative morbidity and is equivalent to TURP in the short term. We present the long-term results of a randomized, prospective trial comparing HoLRP to TURP since information regarding the durability of holmium prostatectomy is lacking in the literature to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with urodynamic obstruction were randomized (April 1996 to August 1997) into 2 comparable groups and assigned to HoLRP or TURP. All patients were assessed preoperatively and followed prospectively at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months postoperatively with an American Urological Association symptom score, quality of life score, peak urinary flow rate, and questionnaires concerning sexual function and continence. Preoperative pressure flow studies, ultrasound prostatic volume assessment and post-void residual volume measurement were repeated at the 6-month visit. All adverse events were noted. RESULTS: Of 120 patients 73 completed the 48-month assessment. HoLRP and TURP resulted in significant improvements in all parameters. There was no difference between the 2 techniques in terms of urodynamic parameters, potency, continence and symptom scores at the 48-month assessment. HoLRP took significantly longer to perform but perioperative morbidity, catheter time, nursing contact time and hospital stay were significantly less for HoLRP compared to TURP. CONCLUSIONS: HoLRP and TURP give equivalent and satisfactory long-term results, with no differences noted in major morbidity. This confirms the durability of these 2 treatments. Peri-operative morbidity is less with HoLRP.     

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized clinical trial

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

A total of 164 cases of BPH were selected from patients who were hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2011. Patients had received either HoLEP or TURP treatment. Clinical data were collected from the perioperative period, 1 month after surgery, and 12 months after surgery.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in the maximum urinary flow rate (Q _max), postvoid residual volume (PVR), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), or quality-of-life score (QOL score) at 1 month after surgery (p = 0.56, p = 0.346, p = 0.536 and p = 0.145, respectively). However, after 12 months, patients from the HoLEP group demonstrated better scores in Q _max, PVR, IPSS, and QOL than those from the TURP group (p = 0.037, p = 0.003, p < 0.001 and p = 0.019, respectively). The two groups had comparable operation time (p = 0.105), catheterization time (p = 0.173), and length of hospital stay (p = 0.395), but were statistically different in the weight of resected prostate tissue (p < 0.001), bladder irrigation time (p < 0.001), hemoglobin levels (p = 0.011), and blood sodium levels (p = 0.002) after surgery.

Conclusions

Compared to TURP, HoLEP was safer and had better long-term efficacy as assessed by multiple quantitative measures. Therefore, HoLEP may present a better option in the treatment of BPH.     

Holmium laser resection v transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 2 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The holmium laser (2140 nm) can be used to ablate, resect, and enucleate the enlarged prostate. The 2-year results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP) and transurethral resection (TURP) are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 120 patients were randomized to either TURP (N = 59) or HoLRP (N = 61). The patients were reviewed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Eighty six (72%) of the patients were available for review at the 2-year mark. RESULTS: At 2 years, there was no significant difference between the two groups in AUA Symptom Score, peak flow rate (Qmax) value, or quality of life score. Adverse events, including reoperations, incontinence, and loss of erectile potency, were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: The HoLRP and TURP procedures result in similar clinical outcomes at 2 years.     

Impact on sexual function of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a prospective, 2-center, randomized trial

PURPOSE: We compared the impact of HoLEP and TURP on sexual function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2003, 120 patients with a mean age +/- SD of 65.2 +/- 7.1 years who had benign prostatic hyperplasia were enrolled in this 2-center, prospective, randomized study. A total of 60 patients with a mean age of 65.25 +/- 6.9 years underwent HoLEP (group 1) and 60 with a mean age of 64.18 +/- 7.2 years underwent TURP (group 2). Patients were assessed before surgery, and at 12 and 24-month followup visits. Subjective symptoms were scored by the International Prostate Symptom Score, the International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life question, IIEF, 10 nonvalidated general assessment questions, physical examination, serum prostate specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (53.3%) in group 1 and 31 (51.6%) in group 2 reported various degrees of erectile dysfunction before surgery according to the IIEF-EF score. Differences between preoperative and postoperative orgasmic domain scores in each group were significant (p <0.001). A slight but not significant increase in the mean IIEF-EF domain score was reported in each group at postoperative assessments without any difference between the 2 surgical approaches. According to general assessment question analysis the prevalence of subjectively reported postoperative retrograde ejaculation was significantly higher than at baseline assessment in the 2 groups with no differences between the 2 surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: TURP and HoLEP significantly lowered the IIEF orgasmic function domain with no differences between techniques. This was caused by retrograde ejaculation. Marginal, nonsignificant erectile function improvement was reported after surgery in the 2 groups.     

Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years

Study Type – Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? HoLEP has been widely adopted worldwide as an alternative to TURP but long term results have been lacking despite the strong scientific basis for the technique. This study provides long‐term results from the original RCT comparing the two techniques.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To assess the durability of holmium laser enucleation of prostate in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Patients were enrolled in the present study between June 1997 and December 2000 and followed per protocol.
• ? All patients were urodynamically obstructed with a prostate volume of between 40 and 200 mL.
• ? At long‐term follow‐up, variables assessed included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII), International Continence Society Short Form Male questionnaire (ICSmale‐SF) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).
• ? Adverse events, including the need for retreatment, were specifically assessed.

RESULTS

• ? Thirty‐one (14 holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [HoLEP] and 17 TURP) of the initial 61 patients were available, with 12 deceased and 18 lost to follow‐up.
• ? The mean (range) follow‐up was 7.6 (5.9–10.0) years and the mean (±sd ) age at follow‐up was 79.8 (±6.2) years.
• ? The mean (±sd ) values (HoLEP vs TURP) were as follows: maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max), 22.09 ± 15.47 vs 17.83 ± 8.61 mL/s; American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, 8.0 ± 5.2 vs 10.3 ± 7.42; quality of life (QOL) score 1.47 ± 1.31 vs 1.31 ± 0.85; BPHII, 1.53 ± 2.9 vs 0.58 ± 0.79; IIEF‐EF (erectile function), 11.6 ± 7.46 vs 9.21 ± 7.17; ICSmale Voiding Score (VS), 4.2 ± 3.76 vs 3.0 ± 2.41; ICSmale Incontinence Score (IS), 3.07 ± 3.3 vs 1.17 ± 1.4.
• ? There were no significant differences in any variable between the two groups beyond the first year.
• ? Of the assessable patients, none required re‐operation for recurrent BPH in the HoLEP arm and three (of 17) required re‐operation in the TURP arm .

CONCLUSION

• ? The results of this randomized trial confirm that HoLEP is at least equivalent to TURP in the long term with fewer re‐operations being necessary.

     

Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients

PURPOSE: Transurethral electrocautery resection (TURP) is generally regarded as the gold standard surgical treatment for bladder outflow obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia despite its rather high morbidity. The high powered holmium:YAG laser can be used endoscopically to enucleate obstructing prostatic tissue in a relatively bloodless manner. The technique of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was compared to standard TURP for the surgical management of prostate adenomas in a randomized, prospective clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 urodynamically obstructed patients with a prostate of less than 100 gm on transrectal ultrasound were randomized to HoLEP or TURP. All patients were assessed preoperatively, and 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient baseline characteristics, perioperative data and postoperative outcome were compared. All complications were noted. RESULTS: HoLEP was significantly superior to TURP in terms of catheter time, hospital stay and hemoglobin loss but operative time was longer. HoLEP and TURP resulted in a significant improvement in American Urological Association symptom scores, peak urinary flow rates and post-void residual urine volumes with symptoms scores and residual volume significantly better in the holmium group. Effects on continence and potency were similar in the 2 groups but adverse events were less frequent in the holmium group. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP and TURP are highly effective procedures for removing obstructing prostatic adenomas. HoLEP resulted in significantly better micturition parameters and less perioperative morbidity.     

Bladder neck resection and transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial

Transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck incision are accepted methods in the treatment of obstructive prostatic hyperplasia. Bladder neck incision is particularly useful in cases of small prostates. We have modified the method of bladder neck incision to bladder neck resection. A randomized prospective trial was done to compare the results of conventional transurethral resection of the prostate (30 patients) and the new method of bladder neck resection. Bladder neck resection was comparable to transurethral resection of the prostate with respect to postoperative hospital stay, maximal flow rates and postoperative complications. Bladder neck resection was better than transurethral resection with respect to the operating time, transfusion requirement, volume of irrigation fluid and postoperative urinary infection. We conclude that bladder neck resection is the operation of choice in patients with a prostate of 30 gm. or less.     

A randomized trial comparing thulium laser resection to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: four-year follow-up results

Objective

To report the results of a randomized prospective trial with a 4-year follow-up, comparing the thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique (TmLRP-TT) with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

BPH patients (96) were randomized for surgical treatment with TmLRP-TT (47) or TURP (49). All patients were assessed pre-operatively and followed at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months post-operatively. Several parameters related to BPH were collected at each follow-up, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rates (Qmax), and post-void residual volume (PVR). All late complications were also recorded.

Results

Dramatic improvement in micturition parameters was observed after TmLRP-TT compared with pre-operative values. Median IPSS decreased 75.6 % in the subsequent 12 months and 61.2 % in 48 months, while median QoL decreased by 80.4 and 59.1 %, respectively. Compared with baseline, numerical values of Qmax increased 1.07-fold and those of PVR decreased 73.1 % in the fourth year. Moreover, all micturition parameters in the TmLRP-TT group were similar to those of TURP patients at every annual assessment. Some late complications after the operations were also observed: one patient suffered from urethral strictures and one from bladder-neck contractures after TmLRP-TT. Re-operation rates were equal in the two groups.

Conclusions

Micturition remained stable after TmLRP-TT during the 4-year follow-up. Outcomes compared favourably with TURP, with lower peri-operative morbidity and equally low occurrence of late adverse effects. Thus, TmLRP-TT can be an available option for BPH patients, especially older, high-risk patients.     

Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PRP) with standard transurethral resection (TUR) of the prostate (TURP). A total of 240 patients (mean age 63.5; age range 52-90 years), with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized into two groups and treated with two different techniques (TURP and PRP). We evaluated pre-operative, per-operative and post-operative (first and 12th months) findings of all patients. The mean catheterization time was 3 and 4.5 days in the PRP and standard TURP groups, respectively (P<0.001). We observed the improvements in maximum flow rates in PRP group were significantly higher than TURP group (P<0.001). TUR of the prostate using plasmakinetic energy seems to be a promising treatment alternative to conventional TURP. It has the advantages of low intraoperative and post-operative complications, short convalescence, excellent intraoperative hemostasis, absence of fluid absorption and TUR syndrome.