mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BackgroundPreoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, CRT failed to impact metastatic recurrence and the risk of side effects on bowel and genitourinary remained a concern. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI had been investigated in LARC. Here, we tried to compare the efficacy of mFOLFOXIRI with mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LARC.Patients and MethodsBetween January 2014 and December 2019, patients with LARC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX6 were retrospective analyzed, including data from a prospective trial (NCT02217020). All patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME). The propensity-score matching was preformed to adjust baseline potential confounders and to estimate differences in outcomes between patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional regression analysis.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 31.1 months. After propensity score matching, 156 patients were available for comparison in each group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 17.9% vs. 5.1% (P< .001), the incidence rate of anastomotic fistula was 3.2% vs. 9% (P = .03), the 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 75% vs. 66.7% (P = .047) and the distant metastasis rate was 16.4% versus 26.6% (P = .013) for mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 group, respectively. Patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI had higher incidence of grade III and/or IV nausea and/or vomiting (7.6% vs. 2.5%, P = .04).ConclusionsNeoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI regimens improved pCR rate and survival outcome, reduced the rate of distant metastasis and anastomotic fistula when comparing with propensity-score matched controls of mFOLFOX6 neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MicroAbstractThis trial assessed the short-term and long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Comparing with propensity-score matched historical control of chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy was well tolerated and led to higher rates of 3 year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Improved response rate in patients with prognostically poor locally advanced rectal cancer after treatment with induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy when compared with chemoradiotherapy alone: A matched case-control study

IntroductionThe addition of induction chemotherapy (ICT) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has the potential to improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, patient selection is essential to prevent overtreatment. This study compared the complete response (CR) rate after treatment with and without ICT of LARC patients with prognostically poor characteristics.MethodsAll LARC patients who were treated with neoadjuvant CRT, whether or not preceded by ICT, and who underwent surgery or were considered for a wait-and-see strategy between January 2016 and March 2020 in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, were retrospectively selected. LARC was defined as any T4 tumour, or a T2/T3 tumour with extramural venous invasion and/or tumour deposits and/or N2 lymph node status, and/or mesorectal fascia involvement (T3 tumours only). Case-control matching was performed based on the aforementioned characteristics.ResultsOf 242 patients, 178 (74%) received CRT (CRT-group) and 64 patients (26%) received ICT followed by CRT (ICT-group). In the ICT-group, 3 patients (5%) did not receive the minimum of three cycles. In addition, in this selected cohort, compliance with radiotherapy was 100% in the ICT-group and 97% in the CRT-group. The CR rate was 30% in the ICT-group and 15% in the CRT-group (p = 0.011). After case-control matching, the CR rate was 28% and 9%, respectively (p = 0.013).ConclusionTreatment including ICT seemed well tolerated and resulted in a high CR rate. Hence, this treatment strategy may facilitate organ preservation and improve survival in LARC patients with prognostically poor characteristics.     

Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure

BACKGROUNDFor locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), standard therapy [consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT)] achieves excellent local control. Unfortunately, survival is still poor due to distant metastases, which remains the leading cause of death among these patients. In recent years, the concept of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has been developed, whereby all systemic ChT-mainly affecting micrometastases-is applied prior to surgery.AIMTo compare standard therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure.METHODSIn a retrospective study, we compared LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure who were treated with standard therapy or with TNT. High-risk for failure was defined according to the presence of at least one of the following factors: T4 stage; N2 stage; positive mesorectal fascia; extramural vascular invasion; positive lateral lymph node. TNT consisted of 12 wk of induction ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, CRT with capecitabine, and 6-8 wk of consolidation ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). In total, 72 patients treated with standard therapy and 89 patients treated with TNT were included in the analysis.RESULTSCompared to standard therapy, TNT showed a higher proportion of pCR (23% vs 7%; P = 0.01), a lower neoadjuvant rectal score (median: 8.43 vs 14.98; P < 0.05), higher T-and N-downstaging (70% and 94% vs 51% and 86%), equivalent R0 resection (95% vs 93%), shorter time to stoma closure (mean: 20 vs 33 wk; P < 0.05), higher compliance during systemic ChT (completed all cycles 87% vs 76%; P < 0.05), lower proportion of acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 during ChT (3% vs 14%, P < 0.05), and equivalent acute toxicity and compliance during CRT and in the postoperative period. The pCR rate in patients treated with TNT was significantly higher in patients irradiated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy than with 3D conformal radiotherapy (32% vs 9%; P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONCompared to standard therapy, TNT provides better outcome for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure, in terms of pCR and neoadjuvant rectal score.     

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Predicts Poor Response and Prognosis in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data From 3 Prospective Studies

PurposeTo evaluate the predictive implications and prognosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with intensified neoadjuvant treatment.MethodsIndividual patient data of LARC patients from 3 prospective clinical trials was analyzed. Neoadjuvant treatment regimens comprised chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with fluorouracil (5-FU) or mFOLFOX6, neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFOXIRI. The postoperative pathological result, local recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) were retrospectively analyzed in patients with MAC and adenocarcinoma (AC) with neoadjuvant treatment.ResultsTotally, 743 patients were recruited, with 620 patients eligible for analysis. Fifty-three (8.5%) patients were MAC. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate and tumor downstaging rate (ypStage 0-I) between MAC and AC patients was 7.5% vs. 22.0% (P = .01) and 20.8% vs. 48.7% (P < .001), respectively. Among patients receiving preoperative CRT with 5FU or mFOLFOX6, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate between MAC and AC patients was 11.1% vs. 27.3% (P = .03) and 23.7% vs. 52.6% (P = .001), respectively. Regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFOXIRI, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate was 0 vs.13.2% (P = .11) and 11.8% vs. 42.5% (P = .03) between MAC and AC group, respectively. With the median follow-up time of 38.9 months, the 3-year DFS and 3-year locoregional recurrence rate was 58.4% vs. 77.6% (P = .02) and 26.0% vs. 5.7% (P = .001) in the MAC and AC group, respectively. MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.98), PNI (HR 3.23, 95% CI, 1.85-5.72) and LVI (HR 2.04, 95% CI, 1.02-4.08) were independent prognosis factors and were associated with worse DFS.ConclusionsPatients with MAC of the rectum are associated with a lower pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate, higher incidence of local recurrence, and poorer DFS with neoadjuvant treatment.     

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With mFOLFOXIRI Without Routine Use of Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

IntroductionAlthough neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) achieves low local recurrence rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), it raises a lot of concerns about long-term anal and sexual functions. We explored the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in patients with LARC.Patients and MethodsPatients with LARC evaluated by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled in this trial. All received 4 to 6 cycles of mFOLFOXIRI. MRI was performed to assess clinical response after chemotherapy. Patients with mesorectal fascia-positive or ycT4a/b after re-evaluation would receive radiation before surgery, whereas responders would have immediate total mesorectal excision (TME). Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) was recommended. The primary endpoint was the proportion of tumor downstaging to ypT_0-2N₀M₀. The secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response rate (pCR), 3-year disease-free survival rate, and safety.ResultsOverall, 106 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy. A total of 103 participants underwent TME surgery. Among 103 patients who completed at least 4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, 2 received short-term radiation before TME, and 12 underwent long-term CRT after MRI evaluation. The pCR rate was 20.4%, and the tumor downstaging rate was 42.7%. Among patients without preoperative long-term radiotherapy, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate were 17.4% and 41.3%, respectively. Among the per-protocol population, the tumor downstaging rate was 48.1%, and the pCR rate was 20.3%. The chemotherapy-related toxicity was well-tolerated.ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and selective radiation does not seem to compromise outcomes in LARC. It could be a reasonable alternative to CRT in previously untreated patients with LARC.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without panitumumab in patients with wild-type KRAS,locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): a randomized,multicenter, phase II trial SAKK 41/07

BackgroundWe conducted a randomized, phase II, multicenter study to evaluate the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAb panitumumab (P) in combination with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with standard-dose capecitabine as neoadjuvant treatment for wild-type KRAS locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).Patients and methodsPatients with wild-type KRAS, T3-4 and/or N+ LARC were randomly assigned to receive CRT with or without P (6 mg/kg). The primary end-point was pathological near-complete or complete tumor response (pNC/CR), defined as grade 3 (pNCR) or 4 (pCR) histological regression by Dworak classification (DC).ResultsForty of 68 patients were randomly assigned to P + CRT and 28 to CRT. pNC/CR was achieved in 21 patients (53%) treated with P + CRT [95% confidence interval (CI) 36%–69%] versus 9 patients (32%) treated with CRT alone (95% CI: 16%–52%). pCR was achieved in 4 (10%) and 5 (18%) patients, and pNCR in 17 (43%) and 4 (14%) patients. In immunohistochemical analysis, most DC 3 cells were not apoptotic. The most common grade ≥3 toxic effects in the P + CRT/CRT arm were diarrhea (10%/6%) and anastomotic leakage (15%/4%).ConclusionsThe addition of panitumumab to neoadjuvant CRT in patients with KRAS wild-type LARC resulted in a high pNC/CR rate, mostly grade 3 DC. The results of both treatment arms exceeded prespecified thresholds. The addition of panitumumab increased toxicity.     

Stepwise neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the management of mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the treatment response, complications and prognosis in mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who underwent stepwise neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) or traditional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).MethodsThe medical records of patients with mid-low rectal cancer who underwent SCRT or CRT were retrospectively analyzed. Differences in the treatment response, pathologic complete response (pCR), R0 resection, local recurrence, anastomotic leakage, presacral infection, anal preservation, defunctioning stoma, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients who underwent SCRT and CRT were compared.ResultsA total of 430 medical records were investigated, including 194 patients in the SCRT group and 236 patients in the CRT group. There was no significant difference in the rates of treatment response, pCR, R0 resection, local recurrence, anastomotic leakage, presacral infection, anal preservation or TEAEs between the two groups. However, the rate of defunctioning stoma in the SCRT group was significantly lower than that in the CRT group (20.1% vs. 44.1%, respectively, P < 0.01). Moreover, the median OS time of the SCRT and CRT groups was 44.0 and 50.5 months, respectively (P = 0.17). The median DFS time of the SCRT and CRT groups was 41.0 and 46.8 months, respectively (P = 0.32).ConclusionCompared with the CRT group, the SCRT group had a similar treatment response, local control and long-term prognosis, and more importantly, a portion of the patients in the SCRT group were exempted from excessive radiation.     

Short term results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with fluoropyrimidine alone or in combination with oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: A meta analysis

BackgroundOxaliplatin (OX), in combination with fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil or Capecitabine, FU)-based regimens and radiation, has been expected to both enhance primary tumour shrinkage and reduce micrometastases at distant sites in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, results in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR) and toxicities were inconsistent. The aim of this meta analysis was to evaluate the short term efficacy and toxicities of adding OX to FU in CRT for LARC.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, ISI databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and the Cochrane library before December, 2011. Additionally, abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences held between January, 2000, and July, 2011, were searched to identify relevant clinical trials. Only randomised studies with an analysis by an intention-to-treat principle were included, and searches were restricted to those databases citing articles in English. Summary incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Four randomised clinical trials comparing OX/FU versus FU alone regimens in CRT for LARC met our search criteria and were assessed. A total of 3863 patients (FU, n = 1937; OX/FU, n = 1926) were included in the analysis.FindingsThe addition of OX to FU significantly improved pathologic complete response (pCR), and reduced peri-operative metastases (including intra-abdominal metastases) with an odd ratios (OR) for OX/FU compared with FU of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.01–1.42; P = 0.04) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.34–0.77; P = 0.001), respectively. The grade 3/4 toxicity rate was significantly higher for OX/FU versus FU alone with an OR of 2.29 (95% CI, 1.31–4.00; P = 0.004). There was no difference in the rates of positive circumferential resection margin, permanent stoma, surgical complication and death within 60 d between the OX/FU and FU alone patients. The OR for the proportion of patients completing full-dose radiotherapy and completing full-dose chemotherapy were 0.32 (95% CI, 0.15–0.69; P = 0.004), and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.35–1.42; P = 0.33), respectively.InterpretationAdding weekly OX to FU in neoadjuvant CRT of LARC appeared to modestly increase the pCR rate and reduced the rate of intra-abdominal or peri-operative metastases in this meta analysis. Although OX/FU significantly increased grade 3/4 toxicity, it did not result in more surgical complications or postoperative deaths within 60 d. The concept of combination of OX and FU in the pre-operative setting for LARC still seems promising, either with a modified schedule, or as induction therapy prior to CRT or after CRT, prior to surgery.     

The long-term influence of hospital and surgeon volume on local control and survival in the randomized German Rectal Cancer Trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94

BackgroundThe association of treatment volume and oncological outcome of rectal cancer patients undergoing multidisciplinary treatment is subject of an ongoing debate. Prospective data on long-term local control and overall survival (OS) are not available so far. This study investigated the long-term influence of hospital and surgeon volume on local recurrence (LR) and OS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancers.MethodsIn a post-hoc analysis of the randomized phase III CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial after a follow-up of more than 10 years, 799 patients with stage II/III rectal cancers were evaluated. LR-rates and OS were stratified by hospital recruitment volume (≤20 vs. 21–90 vs. >90 patients) and by surgeon volume (≤10 vs. 11–50 vs. >50 procedures).ResultsPatients treated in high-volume hospitals had a longer OS than those treated in hospitals with medium or low treatment volume (p = 0.03). The surgeon volume was adversely associated with LR (p = 0.01) but had no influence on overall survival. The positive effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) on local control was the strongest in patients being operated by medium-volume surgeons, less in patients being operated by high-volume surgeons and missing in those being operated by low-volume surgeons.ConclusionsPatients with locally advanced rectal cancers might benefit from treatment in specialized high-volume hospitals. In particular, the surgeon volume had significant influence on long-term local tumour control. The effect of neoadjuvant CRT on local tumour control may likewise depend on the surgeon volume.     

Comparison of pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy or chemoradiation followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer

Introduction

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who are unfit for chemoradiation (CRT), are often offered short-course radiotherapy followed by delayed surgery (SCRT-delay). This entails a lower radiation dose, no chemotherapy and a shorter treatment period. This may lower their chances for complete tumor response and, as such, organ-sparing approaches. The purpose of this study was to compare the pathological complete response (pCR) rates between neoadjuvant CRT and SCRT-delay in patients with LARC in a nationwide database from the Netherlands.

Nomogram predicting response after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using sequential PETCT imaging: A multicentric prospective study with external validation

PurposeTo develop and externally validate a predictive model for pathologic complete response (pCR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on clinical features and early sequential ¹⁸F-FDG PETCT imaging.Materials and methodsProspective data (i.a. THUNDER trial) were used to train (N = 112, MAASTRO Clinic) and validate (N = 78, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore) the model for pCR (ypT0N0). All patients received long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery. Clinical parameters were age, gender, clinical tumour (cT) stage and clinical nodal (cN) stage. PET parameters were SUV_max, SUV_mean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and maximal tumour diameter, for which response indices between pre-treatment and intermediate scan were calculated. Using multivariate logistic regression, three probability groups for pCR were defined.ResultsThe pCR rates were 21.4% (training) and 23.1% (validation). The selected predictive features for pCR were cT-stage, cN-stage, response index of SUV_mean and maximal tumour diameter during treatment. The models’ performances (AUC) were 0.78 (training) and 0.70 (validation). The high probability group for pCR resulted in 100% correct predictions for training and 67% for validation. The model is available on the website www.predictcancer.org.ConclusionsThe developed predictive model for pCR is accurate and externally validated. This model may assist in treatment decisions during CRT to select complete responders for a wait-and-see policy, good responders for extra RT boost and bad responders for additional chemotherapy.     

Microsatellite instability and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundResponse to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer is variable. Identification of biomarkers to predict response is desirable in order to provide prognostic information and targeted therapy. Several studies have investigated microsatellite instability (MSI) as a predictor of response to CRT with contradictory results. This study aims to clarify the effect of MSI status on response to CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies relating to MSI and response to CRT in rectal cancer using the search algorithm (Microsatellite Instability) AND (Chemoradiotherapy) AND (Rectal Cancer). From each included study the number of patients with MSI tumors and Microsatellite Stable (MSS) tumors and the numbers achieving pathological complete response (pCR) were recorded. Pooled outcome measures were determined using a random effects model and the odds ratio estimated with variance and 95% confidence interval.ResultsNine published studies were identified reporting data on MSI and its effect on outcome after CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer. Five studies describing 5,877 patients included data on MSI and the number of patients achieving pCR. There was no significant association between MSI and pCR (MSI Vs MSS: 10.1% Vs 6.6%, OR 1.38, 95% CI: 0.7–2.72, p = 0.35).ConclusionThis meta-analysis concludes that there appears to be no significant difference in pCR rate following CRT in patients with MSI versus MSS rectal tumors.     

Oncologic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: An international retrospective cohort study

IntroductionIntensive local treatment comprising total mesorectal excision (TME) with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has received attention among clinicians treating rectal cancer. It remains unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after intensive local treatment is beneficial for these patients. We evaluated the oncologic benefit of ACT for patients with LARC who received intensive local treatment.Materials and methodsThis international multicentre retrospective cohort study included 737 patients treated in Japan and Korea between 2010 and 2017. The effectiveness of ACT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analyses to identify subpopulations potentially benefiting from ACT.ResultsThe median follow-up was 49 months; the 5-year RFS and local recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 72.1% and 4.9%, respectively; 514 patients (69.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, without an oncologic benefit (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79–1.68) demonstrated in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. In subgroup analyses, the distributions of the 95% CI in patients aged ≥70 years and those with ypStage 0 tended to place a disproportionate emphasis that favoured the non-ACT treatment strategy.ConclusionDespite achieving good local control with intensive local treatment strategy, the effectiveness of ACT for the LARC patients with CRT followed by TME with selective LPND was not proved. Elderly patients and those with ypStage0 may not receive benefit from ACT after CRT and TME ± LPND.     

Total neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases probability for a complete pathologic response

BackgroundMultiple neoadjuvant therapy protocols have been proposed in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiation (CRT), and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as a CT plus CRT. A pathologic complete response (pCR) can be achieved in a minority of cases. We hypothesize that TNT is more likely to confer pCR than other neoadjuvant therapies, which may improve overall survival (OS).MethodsA retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2016 was performed, identifying patients who underwent any neoadjuvant therapy followed by definitive pancreatic resection for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A pathologic complete response was defined as down-staging from any clinical stage to pathologic stage 0.ResultsA total of 5402 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection were identified. 177 patients (3.3%) achieved a pCR. Of the patients who achieved a pCR, 57 received CT, 41 CRT and 79 received TNT. On multivariate analysis, TNT was more likely to confer a pCR than CRT (OR 1.67, CI 1.13–2.46, p = 0.0103) or CT (OR 2.61, CI 1.83–3.71, p < 0.0001). Patients who achieved pCR had a significantly higher OS, with median survival of 64.9 months, compared to 21.6 months in patients who did not achieve pCR (p < 0.0001).ConclusionTNT may be more likely to achieve a pCR than CT or CRT. Patients who achieve a pCR have a significant OS benefit as compared to those who have residual disease. TNT should be considered for patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy, as it may increase the likelihood of achieving a pCR, thus potentially improving OS.     

Global DNA methylation is altered by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer and may predict response to treatment – A pilot study

Aim

In rectal cancer, not all tumours display a response to neoadjuvant treatment. An accurate predictor of response does not exist to guide patient-specific treatment. DNA methylation is a distinctive molecular pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis. Whether DNA methylation is altered by neoadjuvant treatment and a potential response predictor is unknown. We aimed to determine whether DNA methylation is altered by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to determine its role in predicting response to treatment.

Patients and methods

Fifty-three (n = 53) patients with locally advanced rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery were identified from the pathology databases of 2 tertiary referral centres over a 4-year period. Immunohistochemical staining of treatment specimens was carried out using the 5-Methylcytidine (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) antibody. Quantitative analysis of staining was performed using an automated image analysis platform. The modified tumour regression grading system was used to assess tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Results

Seven (13%) patients showed complete pathological response while 46 (87%) patients were partial responders to neoadjuvant treatment. In 38 (72%) patients, significant reduction in methylation was observed in post-treatment resection specimens compared to pre-treatment specimens (171.5 vs 152.7, p = 0.01); in 15 (28%) patients, methylation was increased. Pre-treatment methylation correlated significantly with tumour regression (p < 0.001), T-stage (p = 0.005), and was able to predict complete and partial pathological responders (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant CRT appears to alter the rectal cancer epigenome. The significant correlation between pre-treatment DNA methylation with tumour response suggests a potential role for methylation as a biomarker of response.     

Outcomes of young patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer

BackgroundThe incidence of rectal cancer is higher in the older population. In developed nations, there has been a rise in incidence in young onset colorectal cancer (CRC). We examined the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in younger patients (yRC) compared with older patients, using a retrospective audit.MethodsAll cases of LARC referred to two tertiary referral cancer centres in Western Sydney were examined. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, treatment, relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were obtained. Under 50 years old was used as the cut-off age for defining yRC.ResultsAll 145 consecutive patients were treated for LARC, including 28 in the yRC and 117 in the older patient group. Median follow-up was 54 months. yRC were more likely to complete neoadjuvant therapy (100% vs. 86%; P=0.032) and to undergo more extensive surgical procedures (24% vs. 2%, P<0.0001). yRC were more likely to have microsatellite high (MSI) tumours (30% vs. 4.7%; P=0.003). yRC demonstrated significantly poorer RFS compared with the standard group (HR 2.79; median RFS 4.67 vs. 16.02 months; P=0.023). In the relapsed setting, yRC had poorer PFS compared with the standard group (median PFS 2.66 vs. 9.70, P=0.006, HR 3.04). A difference in OS was also seen between the two groups, with yRC demonstrating poorer OS (median OS 40.46 vs. 58.26 months, HR 3.48, P=0.036).ConclusionsPatients under 50 years with LARC are more likely to have MSI tumours with a more aggressive disease course and poorer RFS, PFS and OS. Initiatives to improve early detection of these patients may improve outcomes. Further research is necessary to understand this disease and optimise its treatment.     

Prediction of pathologic staging with magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: Pooled analysis of KROG 10-01 and 11-02

Background and purposeThe reported overall accuracy of MRI in predicting the pathologic stage of nonirradiated rectal cancer is high. However, the role of MRI in restaging rectal tumors after neoadjuvant CRT is contentious. Thus, we evaluate the accuracy of restaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).Methods and materialsWe analyzed 150 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3–4N0–2) who had received preoperative CRT. Pre-CRT MRI was performed for local tumor and nodal staging. All patients underwent restaging MRI followed by total mesorectal excision after the end of radiotherapy. The primary endpoint of the present study was to estimate the accuracy of post-CRT MRI as compared with pathologic staging.ResultsPathologic T classification matched the post-CRT MRI findings in 97 (64.7%) of 150 patients. 36 (24.0%) of 150 patients were overstaged in T classification, and the concordance degree was moderate (k = 0.33, p < 0.01). Pathologic N classification matched the post-CRI MRI findings in 85 (56.6%) of 150 patients. 54 (36.0%) of 150 patients were overstaged in N classification. 26 patients achieved downstaging (ycT0–2N0) on restaging MRI after CRT. 23 (88.5%) of 26 patients who had been downstaged on MRI after CRT were confirmed on the pathological staging, and the concordance degree was good (k = 0.72, p < 0.01).ConclusionsRestaging MRI has low accuracy for the prediction of the pathologic T and N classifications in rectal cancer patients who received preoperative CRT. The diagnostic accuracy of restaging MRI is relatively high in rectal cancer patients who achieved clinical downstaging after CRT.     

Tumour size is the only predictive factor of distant recurrence after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancers: A sub-study of EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial

PurposeAlthough achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer predicts a better outcome, some patients still relapse. The objectives of this study were to describe the types of events in this group of patients and to identify predictive factors for relapse.MethodsPatients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancers (T4d tumours were excluded) were randomised to receive either six cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy or three cycles of docetaxel followed by three cycles of eprirubicin/docetaxel. pCR was defined as no evidence of residual invasive cancer (or very few scattered tumour cells) in the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes at surgery. Two Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of relapse: one for recurrence-free interval (RFI) and one for distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI).ResultsOut of 283 eligible patients who achieved a pCR, 40 (14.1%) and 28 (9.9%) presented an event of interest for the RFI and DRFI analyses, respectively. Five-year RFI, DRFI and overall survival (OS) were 85.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 80.1–89.3), 89.6% (95% CI, 85.0–92.9) and 91.9% (95% CI, 87.2–94.9), respectively. No predictors for RFI after pCR were identified. For DRFI, tumour size was the only predictor: Hazard ratio (HR) T3 versus T1–2 = 3.62 (95% CI, 1.66–7.89); HR T4 versus T1–2: HR, 2.80 (95% CI, 0.62–12.64) p = 0.0048.ConclusionIn this study, clinical tumour size emerged as the only predictor for DRFI after pCR, with T3 and T4 tumours having an increased risk for distant recurrence compared to T1–2 tumours.     

Analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery: intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal rectal cancer

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a widely purposed and performed treatment for rectal cancer. Downstaging effects possibly enhance the rate of curative surgery and may enable sphincter preservation in low-lying tumours. The current study examines the clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in a neoadjuvant CRT-surgery protocol for rectal cancer, distinguishing between intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal cancer. From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were enrolled in a single-centre, not randomized study based on 5-week sessions of radiotherapy associated with a 30-day protracted venous 5-FU infusion followed by surgical resection. The study population was divided into two groups according to the localization of the tumour: 18 intraperitoneal and 40 extraperitoneal (EPt). Fifty-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. Overall mortality rate was 25.9%, no deaths were recorded during hospitalization; 10 patients (all EPt) died because of recurrence. Significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival rates were found between intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours (P = 0.006), both intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours N(0) (P = 0.04 and P < 0.05) and intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours N(+) (P < 0.05). We diagnosed all local recurrence and liver metastasis in extraperitoneal tumours (t = 0.02 and t = 0.04), and only one case of lung metastasis arose from intraperitoneal cancer. Extraperitoneal tumours could be more aggressive than intraperitoneal ones, spreading more precociously, and/or less responsive to the neoadjuvant CRT because of their localization rather than biological differences. Aside from lymph node status, the location of the tumour with respect to the peritoneum border, is also a prognostic factor of survival in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant CRT and surgery.     

Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic impact of restaging by magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

BackgroundThe prognostic role of restaging rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with preoperative CRT has not been established. The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic role of radiological staging by rectal MRI after preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer.MethodsA total of 231 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative CRT and radical resection from January 2008 to December 2009 were prospectively enrolled. The diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of post-CRT radiological staging by MRI was evaluated.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of radiological diagnosis of good responders (ypTNM stage 0–I) were 32%, 90%, 65%, and 69%, respectively. The overall accuracy of MRI restating for good responders was 68%. The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with radiological and pathological TNM stage 0, stage I, and stage II–III were 100%, 94%, and 76%, respectively (P = 0.037), and 97%, 87%, and 73%, respectively (P = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, post-CRT radiological staging by MRI was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival.ConclusionRadiological staging by MRI after preoperative CRT may be an independent predictor of survival in patients with rectal cancer.