Perioperative and long-term outcomes after open conversion of endovascular aneurysm repair versus primary open aortic repair

BackgroundThe use of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has superseded that of open aneurysm repair (OAR) as the procedure of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. However, significant rates of late reintervention and aneurysm rupture have been reported after EVAR, resulting in the need for conversion to OAR (C-OAR). To assess the relative effects of C-OAR on patients, we compared the outcomes of these patients to those of patients who had undergone P-OAR.MethodsThe data from all patients who had undergone C-OAR and P-OAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database from 2003 to 2018 were queried. Multivariable logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to assess the perioperative long-term outcomes.ResultsA total of 4763 patients were included (91.4%, P-OAR; 8.6%, C-OAR). C-OAR was associated with a significant increase in the odds of perioperative mortality (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7; P = .027) and renal complications (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2; P = .004) vs P-OAR. At 5 years, conversion was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9; P < .001), aneurysmal rupture (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1; P = .007), and reintervention (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.05-1.97; P = .022) compared with P-OAR. These results also persisted at 10 years, with conversion associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8; P < .001), rupture (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8; P = .018), and reintervention (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P = .010).ConclusionsThe results from the present study have demonstrated that C-OAR is associated with a significantly higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with P-OAR. We found a significant increase in mortality, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention at 5 and 10 years of follow-up.     

Impact of weekend treatment on short-term and long-term survival after urgent repair of ruptured aortic aneurysms in Germany

Objective

There is some evidence that weekend admission to the hospital is associated with worse outcomes compared with weekday admission. However, only a few studies have focused on weekend vs weekday surgery outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether there is a weekend effect on outcomes in the treatment of ruptured aortic aneurysms in Germany.

The impact of an interventional vascular specialty team on institutional endovascular aneurysm repair outcomes

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a technically demanding, resource-intensive procedure associated with a significant learning curve. In July 2002, the Department of Defense allocated nearly $5,000,000 for "Advances in Medical Practice" (AMP) and EVAR within the six major military medical centers in the United States Army. We sought to determine the impact of several institutional changes associated with the use of these funds. METHODS: We performed a single-institution, retrospective comparison of our early EVAR outcomes in physiologically similar patients before and after the use of AMP capital and the acquisition of a trained and equipped endovascular operative team. Morbidity, mortality, and operative variables were the main outcomes. Mean follow-up interval was 17.6 months. RESULTS: As of November 2004, a total of 114 conventional open and endovascular AAA repairs were performed at our institution since our first EVAR in May 2000. Ten of 51 (20%) total AAA patients were treated with EVAR by a general vascular surgical team before the addition of an endovascular specialty team to the service in July 2002. An additional 28 of 63 (44%) patients have been treated with EVAR since that time for a total of 38 repairs. During the first year evaluated, 20% of aneurysms were repaired with EVAR versus 83% during the most recent year. Devices from four different manufacturers were used during the study interval. Patients treated by the endovascular team had significantly less mean estimated blood loss (EBL), packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, intravenous (IV) contrast used, and shorter operative times. Morbidity, mortality, endoleaks, and other variables were similar. In linear regression analysis adjusting for complex, time-consuming repairs that required adjunctive procedures outside the realm of normal EVAR, endovascular team EVAR was independently associated with decreased mean operative time, EBL, PRBCs transfused, and IV contrast used. CONCLUSIONS: At a major military medical center, EVAR has become the preferred technique for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. EVAR by a dedicated endovascular surgical team favorably impacts several important operative variables and may improve overall outcomes. Some of these operative variables may be device specific.     

主动脉腔内修复术封闭与重建左锁骨下动脉的研究进展

主动脉腔内修复术中血管支架在腔内需要足够的锚定区,避免内漏等并发症的发生是评价技术成功的重要因素,因此常需覆盖左锁骨下动脉.然而,常规重建左锁骨下动脉是否对预防围手术期脑血管意外等并发症有益以及哪种重建方法更具优势一直存在争议.本文回顾了近年来的临床研究,比较了常规重建左锁骨下动脉与选择性重建左锁骨下动脉的观点,总结了传统开放手术与腔内技术重建左锁骨下动脉最新的临床进展.     

Impact of aortic root repair or replacement in severe destructive aortic valve endocarditis with paravalvular abscesses on long-term survival

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESSurgical treatment of destructive infective endocarditis consists of extensive debridement followed by root repair or replacement. However, it remains unknown whether 1 is superior to the other. We aimed to analyse whether long-term results were better after root repair or replacement in patients with root endocarditis.METHODSA total of 148 consecutive patients with root endocarditis treated with surgery from 1997 to 2020 at our department were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: aortic root repair (n = 85) or root replacement using xenografts or homografts (n = 63).RESULTSPatients receiving aortic root repair showed significantly better long-term survival compared to patients receiving aortic root replacement (log-rank: P = 0.037). There was no difference in terms of freedom from valvular reoperations among both treatment groups (log-rank: P = 0.58). Patients with aortic root repair showed higher freedom from recurrent endocarditis compared to patients with aortic root replacement (log-rank: P = 0.022). Patients with aortic root repair exhibited higher event-free survival (defined as a combination end point of freedom from death, valvular reoperation or recurrent endocarditis) compared to patients receiving aortic root replacement (log-rank: P = 0.022). Age increased the risk of mortality with 1.7% per year. Multi-variable adjusted statistical analysis revealed improved long-term event-free survival after aortic root repair (hazards ratio: 0.57, 95% confidence interval: 0.39–0.95; P = 0.031).CONCLUSIONSAortic root repair and replacement are feasible options for the surgical treatment of root endocarditis and are complementary methods, depending on the extent of infection. Patients with less advanced infection have a more favourable prognosis.Clinical trial registrationUN4232 382/3.1 (retrospective study).     

A review on the use of steerable sheaths in complex endovascular aortic repair

Complex aortic aneurysms are now more commonly treated endovascularly, and often require a fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair. The use of steerable sheaths can improve the technical success rate in catheterisation of target visceral vessels and reduce the surgical risks associated with these complicated procedures. There are several commercially available steerable sheaths in the market, but similar devices can be homemade using different endovascular instruments. Steerable sheaths allow catheterisation of downward orientated branches more easily through a transfemoral approach. The risks associated with a traditional upper extremity access can be minimalised. They are also described in the use of several other situations during endovascular aortic repairs. Limitations to this technique are the availability of the device, the stability of the sheath curvature, the difficulty to deliver instruments in a tight curve and the associated complications if large sheaths are used. Steerable sheaths can be used as a primary intent when challenging anatomy is anticipated or as an adjunct when standard procedures are not successful.     

The importance and impact of patients' health literacy on low back pain management: a systematic review of literature

Background Context

Health literacy (HL) and the overall ability of patients to seek, understand, and apply health information play an important role in the management of chronic pain conditions. Awareness of how patients' HL skills influence their pain experience and how their ability to understand the treatment regimen and to manage chronic pain may allow physicians to adjust clinical treatment accordingly. Despite the prevalence and the substantial economic impact of chronic low back pain (LBP), little is known about the relationship between HL and the treatment and management of this common disease entity.

Impact of proximal seal zone length and intramural hematoma on clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissections

Objective

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become standard treatment of complicated type B aortic dissections (TBADs). Whereas adequate proximal seal is a fundamental requisite for TEVAR, what constitutes “adequate” in dissections and its impact on outcomes remain unclear. The goal of this study was to describe the proximal seal zone achieved with associated clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling.

Influence of measurement and sizing techniques in thoracic endovascular aortic repair on outcome in acute complicated type B aortic dissections

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the first-line therapy in acute complicated type B aortic dissections (cTBAD). Nevertheless, no evidence-based consensus on the optimal measurement technique and sizing for TEVAR in cTBAD exists. The aim was to evaluate how different measurement and sizing techniques for TEVAR affect long-term outcomes.METHODSRetrospective analysis investigating the association between sizing and postoperative results after TEVAR in patients with cTBAD, treated between January 2003 and December 2020. Diameter measurements were performed perpendicular to a centreline in pre-interventional Computed tomography angiographies. Oversizing was determined by measuring aortic diameter in zone 2 of the aortic arch in relation to the implanted stent graft, and categorized into 2 sizing groups (≤10% and >10%). The primary outcome was freedom from aortic-related events. Secondary outcomes included mortality and a comparison of 3 alternative measurement techniques considering the estimated pre-dissection diameter.RESULTSFifty-seven patients (median age 69, interquartile range 59.6–78.2 years) were included. Stent graft oversizing by ≤10% showed a trend towards fewer aortic-related events hazard ratio 0.455 (95% confidence interval 0.128–1.624, P = 0.225).The 3 measurement techniques using the pre-dissection aortic diameter differed by a mean of 1.7–4.0 mm with a variability of up to 8.4 mm. In none of the 57 patients, the same stent graft would have been chosen based on the different measurement techniques using an oversizing ≤10%.CONCLUSIONSTEVAR oversizing of ≤10% in patients with cTBAD might reduce aortic-related events up to 50%. Consensus on measurement techniques of the pre-dissection aortic diameter and stent graft sizing is of paramount importance.     

Effect of liberal blood transfusion on clinical outcomes and cost in spine surgery patients

Background Context

Blood transfusions in spine surgery are shown to be associated with increased patient morbidity. The association between transfusion performed using a liberal hemoglobin (Hb) trigger—defined as an intraoperative Hb level of ≥10?g/dL, a postoperative level of ≥8?g/dL, or a whole hospital nadir between 8 and 10?g/dL—and perioperative morbidity and cost in spine surgery patients is unknown and thus was investigated in this study.

Paediatric trauma systems and their impact on the health outcomes of severely injured children: An integrative review

BackgroundInjury is a leading cause of death and disability for children. Regionalised trauma systems have improved outcomes for severely injured adults, however the impact of adult orientated trauma systems on the outcomes of severely injured children remains unclear.AimsThis research aims to identify the impact of trauma systems on the health outcomes of children following severe injury.MethodsIntegrative review with data sourced from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and hand searched references. Abstracts were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria with fifty nine articles appraised for quality, analysed and synthesised into 3 main categories.ResultsThe key findings from this review include: (1) a lack of consistency of prehospital and inhospital triage criteria for severely injured children leading to missed injuries, secondary transfer and poor utilisation of finite resources; (2) severely injured children treated at paediatric trauma centres had improved outcomes when compared to those treated at adult trauma centres, particularly younger children; (3) major causes of delays to secondary transfer are unnecessary imaging and failure to recognise the need for transfer; (4) a lack of functional or long term outcomes measurements identified in the literature.ConclusionsResearch designed to identify the best processes of care and describe the impacts of trauma systems on the long term health outcomes of severely injured children is required. Ideally all phases of care including prehospital, paediatric triage trauma criteria, hospital type and interfacility transfer should be included, focusing on timeliness and appropriateness of care. Outcome measures should include long term functional outcomes in addition to mortality.     

Derivation and validation of thoracic sarcopenia assessment in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair

ObjectiveSarcopenia, as assessed by computed tomography (CT)-based measurements of muscle mass, is an objective and patient-specific indicator of frailty, which is an important predictor of operative morbidity and mortality. Studies to date have primarily focused on psoas-defined sarcopenia, which may not be valid among patients with thoracic aortic disease. Using psoas sarcopenia as the reference for sarcopenia, the purpose of this study was to create and to validate a new thoracic-level method of measuring sarcopenia as a novel method to assess frailty among patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair.MethodsProspectively collected data of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for thoracic aortic dissection, aneurysm, or injury using a conformable thoracic graft were reviewed. Patients with preoperative abdominal and thoracic CT imaging were included. Thoracic muscle mass was measured on axial images at the T12 level using our newly established standardized computer-assisted protocol. Psoas sarcopenia was measured at the L3 level using standard methods. Optimal sex-specific diagnostic T12 measurements were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A subset of scans were reviewed in duplicate by two trained observers and intraobserver and interobserver reliability tested by intraclass correlation coefficient. Agreement between T12 and L3 sarcopenia was tested by Cohen κ (scale, 0-1).ResultsThere were 147 patients included for analysis, including 34 dissection, 80 trauma, and 33 aneurysm patients. ROC curve analysis yielded sarcopenic cutoff values of 106.00 cm²/m² for women and 110.00 cm²/m² for men at the T12 level. Based on ROC curve analysis, overall accuracy of T12 measurements was high (area under ROC curve, 0.91 for men and 0.90 for women). Quantitative interobserver and intraobserver reliability yielded excellent intraclass correlation coefficient values (>0.95). Qualitative interobserver reliability yielded nearly perfect Cohen κ values (>0.85). Qualitative intraobserver reliability of calculating sarcopenia at both the T12 and L3 levels was fair for both readers (0.361 and 0.288). There was additionally a general correlation between changes in muscle area at L3 with changes at T12 during 48 months.ConclusionsThoracic sarcopenia can be readily and reliably reproduced from CT-derived measurement of T12-level muscle area. This approach may be used as an alternative method to objectively define sarcopenia in patients without abdominal CT imaging. Future studies to assess the predictability of thoracic vs abdominal sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes will enhance the utility of these tools.     

自体富血小板血浆对Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术中输血和短期转归的影响

目的观察自体富血小板血浆(autologous platelet-rich plasma,aPRP)对深低温停循环(deep hypothermic circulatory arrest,DHCA)下的Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术中输血量和术后短期转归的影响。方法选择2016年6月至2017年8月在本院接受手术治疗的急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者83例,男60例,女23例,年龄24～81岁,BMI 19.0～41.9kg/m2,ASAⅣ级。根据是否制备aPRP将患者分为观察组(n=35)和对照组(n=48)。两组患者于麻醉诱导插管后经右侧颈内静脉置入三腔中心静脉导管和Swan-Ganz导管外鞘。随后,观察组于手术开始前完成aPRP制备,对照组开始手术。记录麻醉、手术、心肺转流(cardiopulmonary bypass,CPB)、主动脉阻断和DCHA时间。记录血栓弹力图反应时间(R)、α角和最大振幅(MA);记录术中出血量和红细胞、血浆、冷沉淀和血小板用量;记录术后机械通气时间、ICU留观时间、30d内严重并发症(神经系统并发症、需要持续肾脏替代治疗的急性肾功能不全、二次插管或气管切开、胸骨后感染或胸骨愈合不良、开胸止血)发生率和死亡率。结果观察组手术时间明显短于对照组(P0.05)。麻醉、CPB、主动脉阻断时间差异无统计学意义。观察组DCHA时间明显短于对照组(P0.05)。观察组TEGα角和MA明显大于对照组(P0.05)。观察组术中红细胞、血浆和冷沉淀用量明显少于对照组(P0.05)。两组术后机械通气时间、ICU留观时间、术后30d严重并发症发生率和死亡率差异无统计学意义。结论在DCHA下的Stanford A型主动脉夹层手术,aPRP可减少术中红细胞、血浆和冷沉淀的用量,但对术后机械通气时间、ICU时间、术后30d内严重并发症发生率和死亡率无明显影响。     

The impact of health literacy on health status and resource utilization in lumbar degenerative disease

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Health literacy, defined as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions,” has been demonstrated to affect access to care and appropriate healthcare utilization.

Short-term outcomes of a simple and effective approach to aortic root and arch repair in acute type A aortic dissection

Objective

To evaluate short-term outcomes following direct aortic root and arch repair in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) without technical adjuncts.

The different effect of branches and fenestrations on early and long-term visceral vessel patency in complex aortic endovascular repair

BackgroundAortic endovascular treatment with fenestrated or branched devices (f/bEVAR) requires a connection between the aortic graft and the visceral vessel (VV). However, data on the perioperative and long-term fate of the VVs remain scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate the VV loss (VVL) according to the type of revascularization performed (fenestrations vs branched) and the necessity for adjunctive visceral procedures (AVPs).MethodsFrom 2012 to 2017, all f/bEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PAAAs), and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) were considered. The perioperative VVL, AVPs, and graft configuration were considered and evaluated during the follow-up period.ResultsIn 158 patients, 523 VVs were considered, 140 (26%) in JAAAs, 165 (32%) in PAAAs, and 218 (42%) in TAAAs. Branches were used for 114 vessels (52%) in TAAAs, 8 (5%) in PAAAs, and 0 (0%) in JAAAs. The overall perioperative VVL was 20 (3.8%) and was significantly greater in TAAAs than in PAAAs or JAAAs (6.4% vs 2.4% vs 1.4%; P = .03). The branches resulted in greater perioperative VVL compared with fenestration (9% [11 of 122] vs 2% [9 of 401]; P = .0001). A significant VVL difference between the branches and fenestrations was identified selectively only for the renal arteries: 11 of 52 (21%) vs 6 of 224 (2.5%; P = .001). The results of the multivariate analysis confirmed the independent greater risk of VVL for branches and renal arteries (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 12.5-1.7; P = .04; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 52.6-1.05; P = .05, respectively). AVPs were performed in 43 VVs (8.2%) because of dissection (n = 2; 0.4%), stenosis (m = 3; 0.6%), bleeding (n = 3; 0.6%), or kinking between the bridging stent graft and the VV (n = 35; 7%). A significant difference between the branches and fenestrations was seen only for kinking between the bridging stent graft and VV (12% [15 of 112] vs 5% [20 of 401]; P = .005). At 5 years, the incidence of VVL was 2% ± 1%. The fenestrations had significantly greater freedom from VVL compared with the branches (100% vs 87% ± 6%; P = .04), which was confirmed selectively for TAAAs (100% vs 87% ± 6%; P = .04). The use of AVPs did not affect long-term visceral patency.ConclusionsEarly and late VVL was infrequent in complex aortic procedures but seemed to occur more frequently in branches than in fenestration, especially for renal arteries. AVPs were often required to correct artery kinking but this did not affect the long-term patency.     

Variation in center-level frailty burden and the impact of frailty on long-term survival in patients undergoing elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveFrailty is increasingly recognized as a key determinant in predicting postoperative outcomes. Centers that see more frail patients may not be captured in risk adjustment, potentially accounting for poorer outcomes in hospital comparisons. We aimed to (1) determine the effect of frailty on long-term mortality in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and (2) evaluate the variability in frailty burden among centers in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database.MethodsPatients undergoing elective open and endovascular AAA repair (2003-2017) were identified, and those with complete data on component variables of the VQI-derived Risk Analysis Index (VQI-RAI) and centers with ≥10 AAA repairs were included. VQI-RAI characteristics are sex, age, body mass index, renal failure, congestive heart failure, dyspnea, preoperative ambulation, and functional status. Frailty was defined as VQI-RAI ≥35 based on prior work in surgical patients using other quality improvement databases. This corresponds to the top 12% of patients at risk in the VQI. Center-level VQI-RAI differences were assessed by analysis of variance test. Relationships between frailty and survival were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test for open and endovascular procedures. Multivariable hierarchical Cox proportional hazards regression models were calculated with random intercepts for center, controlling for frailty, race, insurance, AAA diameter, procedure type, AAA case mix, and year.ResultsA total of 15,803 patients from 185 centers were included. Mean VQI-RAI scores were 27.6 (standard deviation, 5.9; range, 4-56) and varied significantly across centers (F = 2.41, P < .001). The percentage of frail patients per center ranged from 0% to 40.0%. In multivariable analysis, frailty was independently associated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 2.88; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-3.2) after accounting for covariates and center-level variance. Open AAA repair was not associated with long-term mortality after adjusting for frailty (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.13). There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of frail patients compared with nonfrail patients who were discharged to a rehabilitation facility or nursing home after both open (40.5% vs 17.8%; P < .0001) and endovascular repair (17.7% vs 4.6%; P < .0001).ConclusionsThere is considerable variability of preoperative frailty among VQI centers performing elective AAA repair. Adjusting for center-level variation, frailty but not procedure type had a significant association with long-term mortality; however, frailty and procedure type were both associated with nonhome discharge. Routine measurement of frailty preoperatively by centers to identify high-risk patients may help mitigate procedural and long-term outcomes and improve shared decision-making regarding AAA repair.     

Delay in detection and treatment of perioperative anemia in hip fracture surgery and its impact on postoperative outcomes

BackgroundElderly patients with hip fractures are at high risk for perioperative anemia as a result of fracture- and surgery-related blood loss. The detection of anemia is dependent on intermittent blood samples and therefore might be delayed, potentially leading to a significant delay in transfusion. This study aimed to investigate the possible delay in perioperative anemia detection, accumulated perioperative anemia-associated burden, peripheral perfusion, and their association with patient outcomes in elderly patients with hip fracture.MethodsElderly patients with acute hip fracture scheduled for surgery were enrolled in this prospective study from August 2016 to December 2016. All patients were monitored continuously for hemoglobin concentration (SpHb) and perfusion index (PI) with the Radical-7® Pulse CO-Oximeter® and Rainbow® R1 Adhesive Multi-parameter Sensors (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA, US) from 12 h presurgery to 24 h postsurgery.ResultsFifty-one patients were enrolled, and 41 were included in the final analyses. Mean delay in the detection of low Hb (<10 g/dL) using intermittent blood samples, when compared with SpHb, was 1.07 h (standard deviation, ±2.84 h). Median perioperative cumulated time with low SpHb (<10 g/dL for at least one min) was 25 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 21–690). There was a significant association between perioperative time with low SpHb and the occurrence of postoperative delirium (median cumulated time with low SpHb: 162 min in patients with delirium vs 22 min in patients without delirium, P = 0.034) and a nonsignificant trend for an association between perioperative time with low SpHb and 90-day mortality or medical complications (median cumulated time with low SpHb: 119 min for patients with mortality or severe complication vs 22 min for patients without mortality or severe complication, P = 0.104). PI values during the perioperative period were not significantly associated with patient outcomes. Cumulated time with low PI (<0.5) preoperatively (but not perioperatively) was significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative delirium (P = 0.047).ConclusionsThis study showed a delay in transfusion threshold detection, and the presence of significant associations between low SpHb or time with low SpHb and postoperative outcomes.     

Advances in aortic valve repair: focus on functional approach, clinical outcomes, and central role of echocardiography

The surgical classification of aortic regurgitation (AR) is based on cusp mobility. Based on this classification, there are 3 classes of AR: type I is defined as normal cusp mobility, type II is defined as excessive cusp mobility, and type III is defined as restricted cusp mobility. Patients often have multiple coexisting mechanisms. Because aortic valve (AV) repair is safe, effective, and durable, it likely will become a mainstream surgical option for the management of significant AR, even in the setting of a bicuspid valve. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography has a central role at all stages in AV repair. Before cardiopulmonary bypass, it can accurately diagnose the mechanism of AR to guide operative strategy for successful repair. After separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, it can comprehensively evaluate the AV repair, including the likelihood that the repair will be durable in the long-term. Important echocardiographic predictors of a durable AV repair include the absence of AR, cusp coaptation above the annular plane, a coaptation length >4 mm, and an effective cusp height >8 mm. The clinical applicability of AV repair continues to expand and likely will evolve into a mainstream surgical therapy for AR, including minimally invasive techniques.