国人肝段的再认识

目的:对肝内门静脉和肝静脉重新认识,提出一种新的国人肝段划分方法,为影像学和肝外科提供断层解剖学资料。方法:使用50例上腹部连续断层标本和20例多层螺旋CT图像及三维重建图像,研究了肝内门静脉的走行和分布以及肝静脉及其属支的回流范围及其两者之间的相互关系。结果:国人肝段新的划分方法:门静脉右支主干存在时,依肝中静脉所在的正中裂将肝分为左、右半肝。右半肝被一弯曲的右叶间裂分成右前上叶和右后下叶。右前上叶依垂直段间裂分为腹侧和背侧段。右前上叶的腹侧段被水平亚段间裂分为上、下两个亚段。右后下叶依水平段间裂分为上、下两段。肝左静脉主干存在时,依肝左静脉主干所在的左叶间裂将左半肝分成左后上叶和左前下叶。左前下叶依左段间裂分为内侧和外侧段。水平亚段间裂将左前下叶的内侧段分为上、下两个亚段。依弧形背裂分尾状叶和右前上叶及左前下叶内侧段。结论:国人肝段新的划分法不仅有利于肝内微小病变的精确定位,而且便于肝外科探索新的和更加安全的术式来施行各种肝切除和肝移植。     

基于肝内肝门静脉解剖的肝脏右前叶分段新概念

目的根据肝内肝门静脉的走形分布,提出肝脏分段的新概念,为影像学和肝脏外科提供资料。方法采用60例正常的活体肝移植供肝影像资料,研究右前叶肝内肝门静脉的走形和分布以及肝静脉及其属支的回流范围,10例Mevis三维软件重建图像,探讨两者之间的关系。结果 Couinaud分段中的Ⅷ段门脉支可大致分为腹侧支和背侧支,最多可达4支;约90%的背侧支越过肝右静脉分布到Couinaud分段中的VII段。V段的门脉分支大多来自右前叶或Ⅷ段门脉的腹侧支。因此,可将右前叶分为腹侧段:Couinaud分段中的Ⅷ段的腹侧段(S8v)和V段(S5)背侧段:Couinaud分段中的Ⅷ段的背侧段(S8d)两个部分。结论新的划分方法不仅有利于肝内病变的精确定位,而且便于肝脏外科实施新的、更安全的术式。     

右半肝肝段解剖研究进展

对肝内血管解剖结构及肝段的准确认识是肝切除术前评估和活体肝移植肝段选择的基础。特别是活体肝移植供体肝段的选择,需要考虑到肝段的体积、门脉及动脉血供和静脉回流,更需要对肝内各管道的解剖结构有精确的把握。右半肝管道立体交叉关系复杂,门静脉及肝静脉变异均多见。国际上通用的Couinaud肝段划分法,将右半肝分为4段,段Ⅷ、段Ⅴ为上下关系,段Ⅶ,段Ⅵ为上下关系。但随着肝脏手术的进展,影像学技术的提高,人们对右半肝肝段解剖划分提出质疑并有了新的观点。大部分学者倾向于以肝内门静脉3级分支分布形式作为划分右半肝肝段的主要依据,同时肝静脉引流情况也是重要的辅助依据,但分段方式并未形成统一。     

国人肝段在冠状断层上的划分

目的：为肝内微小病变精确定位诊断和外科治疗提供冠状断层解剖学依据。方法：采用30例上腹部连续冠状断层标本、20例肝内门静脉和肝静脉解剖正常的薄层MSCT断层图像及其三维重建图像,在冠状断层上对其门静脉肝段进行精确划分。结果：经胆囊、门静脉左支及肝左静脉的冠状断面上,肝中静脉主干是划分右前上叶和左前下叶的识别标志,门静脉左支角部是左前下叶的段间裂识别标志,亦是右前上叶和左前下叶的亚段间裂识别标志。经肝门静脉主干的冠状断面上,门静脉右前支主干是右前上叶的段间裂识别标志,该层面以前为右前上叶的腹侧段,该层面以后则为右前上叶的背侧段。经网膜孔的冠状断面上、下腔静脉的右缘是划分尾状叶和右半肝的识别标志,门静脉右后支主干是划分右前上叶背侧段和右后下叶下段的标志,经下腔静脉和肝右静脉的冠状面上,肝右静脉主干是划分右前上叶的背侧段和右后下叶上段的标志;门静脉右后支主干是右后下叶的段间裂识别标志。结论：国人门静脉肝段在冠状断面上的精确划分,不仅有利于肝内微小病变的精确定位,且有利于探索新的和更加安全的外科术式。     

Couinaud肝段在横断面上的划分

为给ＭＲ图像精定位肝内占位性病变提供断面解剖学依据，利用２０例腹部连续横断面标本，研究了肝段在横断面上的划分。正中裂为下腔静脉中点至肝中静脉或胆囊窝中份的连线；在叶间裂的上份为下腔静脉中点至镰状韧带的连线，门静脉左支脐部和肝圆韧带裂是其中、下份的天然标志；肝左静脉位一左段间裂中；右叶间裂为下腔静脉中点至肝右静脉的连结；肝门或门静脉右支可作为右段间裂的标志；背裂为下腔静脉缘至门静脉或静脉韧带裂右端的     

Configuration of the liver segment observed in the frontal section including the origin of the left portal trunk at the hepatic hilum

After preparing threparing the frontal section including the origin of the left portal trunk at the hepatic hilum, 60 human livers (35, entirely; 25, partly) were dissected to reveal segmental configuration and the supplying portal vein branches. We usually observed two combinations of segments, i.e., S2, 4, 5 and 8 or S2, 3, 4, 5 and 8, in the frontal section including the origin of the left portal trunk. However, S8 was sometimes absent in the section when S4 extended to the right and/or upper side. S2 was consistently located dorsal to S3 despite the fact that 11.7% of the specimens carried an unexpected configuration showing a "lower" S2 in combined with an "upper" S3 in the frontal section. The latter case was associated with specific S2 and S3 segmental branches maintaining horizontal courses along a common plane. S4, S5 and S8 were usually arranged from the ventral to the dorsal aspect in this order. Four types of ventral short branches originated at or near the primary portal divisions and supplied the hilar parenchyme adjacent to S4 and/or the anterior segment (S5 or S8). These ventral short branches tended to be associated with the variations of the primary division. Dissection of the liver after frontal section provided a better understanding of the segmental configuration rather than an approach from the hepatic hilum.     

Origin and distribution of portal blood in the sheep

In sheep, the gastrosplenic and mesenteric veins converge at an angle of about 140° to form the portal vein, which is joined, along its right ventral border, by the gastroduodenal vein. At the porta, right and left branches of the portal vein diverge at an angle of 65–70° to supply separate areas that join along a line between the fossa for the gall bladder, and the middle of the left branch. Right dorsal branches leave the portal vein or its right branch near the point of bifurcation. When ¹³¹I-albumin that had been heated was injected into the right ruminal vein and entered the portal stream in the gastrosplenic vein, no significant differences existed in the levels of radioactivity between the areas supplied by the different portal branches. When the ¹³¹I-albumin entered the portal stream from either the gastroduodenal or mesenteric veins, the area supplied by the right branch contained a significantly higher level of radioactivity than the remainder of the liver. When corrections were made for an unequal distribution of blood, it was found that blood from the gastrosplenic vein was distributed preferentially to the left branch, blood from the gastroduodenal vein to the right branch, and that blood from the mesenteric vein enters the right and left branches in preference to the right dorsal branches of the portal vein.     

肝内胆管的应用解剖与肝内胆管结石手术入路的研究

目的 探讨肝内叶、段胆管的解剖结构及肝内胆管结石的手术入路。方法 通过研究12例成人肝脏标本的肝内胆管与血管的位置、毗邻关系,设计出经肝的脏面显露左右肝管,经肝的膈面显露肝内叶、段胆管相对合的手术入路,并结合治疗56例复杂性肝内胆管结石患者。结果 左右肝管均位于肝脏脏面门静脉左右干的前上缘;左内叶、右前叶胆管位于相应门静脉的前内侧。右后叶胆管位于门静脉右前支或右前叶下段支脏面测侧者占66.7％(8/12);位于门静脉右后支脏面深侧或后上缘者占83.3％(10/12)。左外叶胆管位于门静脉矢状部脏面深侧者占91.7％(11/12)。选择经肝的脏面显露左右肝管,经肝的膈面显露肝内叶、段胆管相结合的手术入路,治疗复杂性肝内胆管结石患者56例,临床疗效满意。结论 选择经肝的脏面与膈面相结合的手术方式,较易取出结石。     

Absence of the portal bifurcation at the hilum of the liver due to intrahepatic origin of the left branch of the portal vein

Abstract The authors report a rare anomaly of portal vascularization which was detected by CT-scan and MRI and then confirmed surgically. There was no portal bifurcation at the hilum of the liver. After giving off its right dorsal branch, the portal vein entered the right liver and divided in the parenchyma into the right ventral and left branches. The arterio-biliary distribution was normal. Only a few similar cases have been reported. The left branch of the portal vein is reported to have few variations in contrast with the right one, which has many. The venous structure of the liver varies increasingly with the distance from the left umbilical vein. During a right hepatectomy, the possibility of such a vascularization makes it necessary to ensure that the left branch of the portal vein starts upstream before dividing a portal branch entering the right liver.     

A study of the accessory hepatic vein to segments VI and VII with a morphological reconsideration of the human liver

Introduction The liver is supplied by the common hepatic artery from the celiac trunk and by the portal vein from the gastrointestine. This double blood supply to the liver by the hepatic artery and the portal vein produced a complicated structure in the liver. For the blood outflow, we can see right, intermediate and left hepatic veins, and irregular veins: the accessory hepatic veins. These veins drain the blood in the liver into the inferior vena cava. In this study, we studied the layout of the accessory hepatic vein draining segments 6 and 7 in the human livers and attempted to reconsider the structure of the liver by the layout of the accessory hepatic vein. Methods Sixty livers were subjected in this study. They were prepared by using forceps to trace the layout of the blood vessels inside the livers. We carefully examined the relation between the layouts of the accessory vein to the segments 6 and 7 and of the portal vein. The confluence patterns of the accessory hepatic vein into the inferior vena cava were also examined to find the character of the vein. The relation between the accessory hepatic vein and standard hepatic veins was also studied. Results We found 2.2 accessory hepatic veins in one liver on average in our study. The vein was always within the area of segments 6 and 7, and did not surpass the boundary. We found at most five accessory hepatic veins in a liver in two cases. The accessory hepatic vein to the segments 6 and 7 always had its stem on the dorsal side to the portal vein. Different from the stem, the periphery of the accessory hepatic vein freely distributed with the peripheral branches of the portal vein. The area distributed by the accessory vein was also always dorsal part within the segments 6 and 7. The vein was small usually, but was big in few cases. When the vein was big, the area became solely drained by the accessory vein, because the standard hepatic veins (right and intermediate hepatic veins) did not reach the area, and we did not find any communication between the accessory vein and the standard veins. As the remaining region in the segments 6 and 7 became smaller, the draining right standard hepatic vein became shorter and smaller. Discussion The region drained by the accessory hepatic vein excluded the standard hepatic veins. Therefore, there are two different draining venous networks in the area of segments 6 and 7 classified by Couinaud. Conclusion The accessory hepatic vein draining segments 6 and 7 distributed somewhere dorsal side in the segments 6 and 7. The area where the accessory vein distributed was the region where standard hepatic veins did not reach. This would suggest that the region drained by the accessory hepatic vein makes an isolated segment in the liver in the segments 6 and 7 by the Couinaud’s Classification. The area might have a unique blood circulation system.     

Identification of segments VI and VII of the liver based on the ramification patterns of the intrahepatic portal and hepatic veins

We describe the pattern of intrahepatic vessel ramification in the right posterior hepatic sector in a population of 197 adults. Each specimen was dissected from its visceral (inferior) surface in order to demonstrate variations in the distribution of the portal vein branches to the hepatic segments of the right lobe, especially to segments VI (S6) and VII (S7) as described by Couinaud. We also examine whether three hepatic veins, i.e., the right hepatic vein (RHV), middle hepatic vein (MHV), and the short hepatic vein (SHV), aid the identification of segmental portal branches in the lower posterior sector. Four major patterns of branching of the posterior sectorial trunk of the portal vein system are described. In group A (32.0%) a single posterior trunk formed an arch‐like pattern sending multiple branches to S6 and S7 (P6 and P7). We named the multiple branches to the apparent S6 the inferoposterior portal branches. It was difficult to identify which of these branches were equivalent to P6. In group B (27.9%), the posterior sectorial trunk bifurcated to form P6 and P7. In most of the specimens in this group, therefore, we were able clearly to identify both S6 and S7 based on the portal vein system. In group C (6.6%), the trunk trifurcated to form P6, P7, and an intermediate branch, which supplied both segments or a gray zone between them. Group D (33.5%) included variations of the anterior segmental branches, and in specimens of this group, the anteromedial border of the sector was difficult to identify. Notably, the three‐dimensional interdigitating topographical relationship of the hepatic veins and the portal branches was not evident in the lower posterior sector, since tributaries of the RHV and the portal branches followed similar courses and paralleled each other in the region and since the territory of the SHV was usually restricted to the superficial parenchyma near the inferior surface. In group A, tributaries of the RHV/SHV (>3 mm in diameter) passed between the inferoposterior portal branches in only 22.2%/14.3% of the specimens. Thus the hepatic veins often did not reveal which of the multiple inferoposterior branches was P6. Moreover, in the subset of Group B in which the segments were identified based on the portal vein ramification, tributaries of the RHV/SHV (>3 mm in diameter) showed the intersegmental interdigitating arrangement in only 32.0%/6.0% of the specimens. In addition, a thick tributary of the MHV, sometimes arising from S6, did not run along, but penetrated the S5/S6 border plane from the lateral to the medial side. Therefore, the three hepatic veins (RHV, SHV, MHV) often did not aid the identification of the liver segments in the region. Consequently, the less than ideal combinations of irregular configurations of the portal and hepatic venous systems suggest that the right posterior segments cannot be conclusively identified anatomically in 30–40% of cases. Other means of identification, such as the conventional proportional manner (the upper and lower halves of the posterior sector roughly correspond to S6 and S7) may be required. Clin. Anat. 12:229–244, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Main accessory sulcus of the liver

It has been proposed that the superficial part of the portal fissures weakens the surface hepatic parenchyma, allowing the development of accessory sulci caused by diaphragmatic pressure. To evaluate the relationship of the sulci in the antero-superior surface of the right liver with the right portal fissure, macroscopic post mortem examination of 85 livers was carried out and radio-opaque resins were injected into the portal and hepatic venous systems to obtain vascular casts. After formalin fixation, the 85 livers also underwent CT and MR scans and 3D image elaboration. Diaphragmatic sulci were found in 32 cases. We studied the sulci located in the right liver, i.e., those that lay to the right of the line of Cantlie. They were found in 28 instances and in 16 cases they were multiple. In the livers with a single sulcus, it extended between the anterior and right surfaces of the right liver and showed a curved course downward and forward, toward the inferior margin. In the cases with multiple sulci, one sulcus always showed a course similar to that of the single sulci. The 28 sulci, with similar position and course, showed variable characteristics (mean length=7.6 +/- 2.7 cm, mean width=0.8 +/- 0.7 cm, mean depth=1.4 +/- 0.8 cm). Both radiological images and corrosion casts showed a correspondence between these sulci and the right hepatic vein and the right portal fissure in 71% of cases. These sulci may represent the variable expression (cranial, intermediate, or caudal portions) of a potential sulcus, the main accessory sulcus (MAS), that develops along a theoretically predictable course corresponding to the superficial part of the right portal fissure. The high prevalence of location of the MAS at the level of the upper part of the right portal fissure can be ascribed to the presence at this level of the watershed between the roots of the tributaries of the hepatic veins coming from segments VIII and VII, draining respectively into the middle and right hepatic veins. Thus, the coexistence of the two portal and hepatic venous boundaries may represent a further predisposition to the effects of diaphragmatic pressure. The MAS may represent a marking for the right portal fissure, and hence a superficial reference for the deep course of the right hepatic vein.     

Location of the ventral margin of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe of the human liver with special reference to the configuration of hepatic portal vein branches

The topographic anatomy of the ventral margin of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe of the human liver has not been clearly described to date. To this end we hypothesize the existence of a precaudate plane, a flat or slightly curved plane defined by the ventral margins of the ligamentum venosum and the hilar plate. Using 76 cadaveric livers, we investigated whether the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe extended ventral to this plane and whether the paracaval caudate branch of the portal vein (PC) ran through this plane to its ventral side. In 28 of the specimens (36.8%), the PC extended over the plane to a variable depth: less than 10 mm in 10 specimens, 10-20 mm in 10, and more than 20 mm in eight specimens. This ventral extension of the PC consistently included its penetration into the dome-like area under the terminals of the three major hepatic veins; therefore, the ventrally extended PC often interdigitated with these veins and their tributaries (in practice, the ventral margin of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe could generally be considered to run alongside the middle hepatic vein). Moreover, the ventral extension of the PC often reached the upper, diaphragmatic surface or the dorsal surface of the liver immediately to the right of the inferior vena cava. Several branches (termed border branches) in the ventral extension were difficult to identify as belonging to the PC. We discuss both the marginal configuration of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe and how to identify and operate on the ventrally extended PC and related border branches during liver surgery.     

胆囊床内血管的应用解剖

目的：为腹腔镜胆囊切除手术提供形态学基础.方法：对128例肝脏标本进行解剖,观察胆囊床内血管的位置、行程,测量其在胆囊床内的长度和直径.结果：胆囊床内血管有：（1）胆囊动脉深支及分支,占71.1%（91例）;（2）肝中静脉及其属支,占12.5%（16例）,其突入形式分①肝中静脉主干,②右前叶支、或左内叶支、或两者一起突出,③右前叶支属支、左内叶支属支、或两者一起突出3种类型;（3）肝门静脉右支及其分支,分主干和分支两类,主干占39.8%（51例）,肝门静脉右支的分支占14.8%（19例）;（4）肝门静脉左支的分支,占2.34%（3例）;（5）胆囊静脉,在胆囊附着面有小静脉与肝中静脉、肝门静脉左、右支的分支相连.结论：切除胆囊时应注意胆囊床左、右缘,以及具有肝门右切迹的病例,保护突入胆囊床内的肝中静脉及其属支,以防止出血.     

Contribution to the study of diaphragm innervation in Nelore bovines

The phrenic nerves, in Nelore bovines, divide more frequently (60%) in a dorsal branch and a ventrolateral trunk, in both left and right sides. Another division, in trifurcation, giving off dorsal, lateral and ventral branches occurred in 23.3% of cases in the right side and in 30% left side. The division in ventral branch and dorsolateral trunk was observed in 16.6% of cases in the right side and 10% left side. The dorsal branches, both left and right, were distributed among their corresponding lumbar portions in all the cases verified. In 3% of the muscles studied, the right dorsal branch sent a nervous twig to caudal vena cava, and in 73.3% of the muscles, the left dorsal branch innervated the left lumbar portion and also sent some twigs which, after crossing the middle line, distributed in the right lumbar portion, ventral to esophageal hiatus. The lateral and ventral branches, in both left and right sides, innervated corresponding parts of the muscle. Connections (anastomosis) were observed between left lateral and dorsal branches in 10% of cases, and between dorsal left and right branches in 6.7% of cases.     

肝脏第IX段临床应用解剖及恶性肿瘤的介入栓塞化疗

目的探讨肝脏第IX段临床应用解剖及其占位性病变的介入治疗。方法对50例肝脏进行解剖观察;对6例肝脏第IX段占位性病变进行介入栓塞化疗。结果肝脏第IX段动脉主要来源于肝右动脉,部分来自肝中动脉或肝左动脉;门静脉主要来自门静脉右前叶上段支,小部分来自门静脉左支横部;胆管汇入右肝管;静脉血由数支细小静脉经第3肝门直接汇入肝后下腔静脉,部分汇入肝右静脉。第IX段肝脏肿瘤通过血管介入治疗后,肿瘤显著缩小;其中4例合并黄疸患者肝功能明显缓解。结论肝脏第IX段是一个结构上较为独立的区域,有其特殊的管道系统和引流系统,位置深隐,单独或联合手术切除较困难;通过介入技术可以对该区段进行相应的治疗。利用微导管采用超选技术,可以对肝脏第IX段的病变进行精确的治疗,微创、副作用小、可重复操作,能够弥补外科手术的局限性,达到甚至超过外科手术的治疗效果。     

Clinical anatomy related to the hepatic veins for right lobe living donor liver transplantation

The complexity of liver reconstruction has limited partial right lobe living donor liver transplantation. It is largely due to the difficulty of dealing with the middle hepatic vein. We sought to define the anatomic features of hepatic veins. Forty‐one fresh adult livers, 43 formalin‐fixed adult cadaver livers, and 91 adult liver corrosion casts were used for the study. We determined the number of branches, the maximum diameter, the whole length, the extrahepatic length of the hepatic veins, and the deviation of the middle hepatic vein from the main portal fissure. Nakamura and Tsuzuki's classification of hepatic vein types was used. Type A, B, and C accounted for 59.4, 27.8, and 12.8% of all specimens in this study, respectively. The middle and left hepatic veins formed a common trunk in 60.3% of the specimens, and the length of the common trunk was 1.12 ± 0.62 cm. The degree of deviation to the right of the middle hepatic vein from the main portal fissure was 14.11° ± 12.65°. The frequency of hepatic vein types and the degree of deviation to the right of the middle hepatic vein in this study is markedly different from that reported in other literature. The anatomic features of the hepatic veins in this study suggest that right lobe living donor liver transplantation is more suitable for Chinese. Clin. Anat. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

左外叶活体肝移植的解剖学研究

目的：模拟左外叶活体肝移植门静脉、肝动脉和胆管的切取方法。方法：解剖正常人肝脏标本30具，观察肝脏铸型标本30具，测量门静脉、肝动脉及胆管长度、管径及属支或分支分布情况。结果：左外叶门静脉的血供来自门静脉左支，主要为左外叶上段门静脉支、左外叶下段门静脉支；动脉主要来源于肝固有动脉、肝左动脉、肝中动脉，偶有迷走动脉支；胆道引流属支有左外叶上段胆管支、左外叶下段胆管支。结论：左外叶解剖变异较多，活体取肝前应仔细研究其结构特点，设计合理的切取模式；对门静脉、肝动脉和胆管支需行必要的整形，以便与受体相应的管道进行吻合。     

Ramification pattern and topographical relationship between the portal and hepatic veins in the left anatomical lobe of the human liver.

Sixty-one human livers obtained from donated Japanese adult cadavers were dissected to reveal the ramification pattern of the portal and hepatic veins, and their topographical relationship in the left anatomical lobe. The segmental portal vein supplying S2 (P2) tended to form a single stem, whereas that of S3 (P3) was usually double. An intermediate branch between P2 and P3 was observed in 23.0% of livers. In spite of variation between livers, definite P2 and P3 were identified in 47 specimens. One tributary of the left hepatic vein (LHV) was usually present for drainage of S2, and two tributaries were present for S3 (sometimes also for S2 and/or S4). The latter two tributaries of the LHV and the two subsegmental branches of S3 showed three patterns of three-dimensional interdigitations. From these results, the portal vein system did not seem to have a two segmental composition (i.e., S2 and S3) in 23.0% of specimens, whereas the hepatic vein system did not have an intersegmental course in 23.4%. Thus, there were obvious limitations in using each system to determine the liver segment. Taking the overlapping cases into consideration, the left anatomical lobe of 41.0% of specimens did not seem to fit the definition of Couinaud's liver segment. In addition, four patterns of fissure vein (or scissural vein), > 5 mm in diameter at its terminal, were identified: (1) middle hepatic vein type (left median vein, 9.8%); (2) LHV type (left medial vein, 41.0%); (3) true fissure vein (3.3%); and (4) absent cases (45.9%). The former two types also suggested limitations of the hepatic vein system as an indicator of the segmental border.     

肝蒂内结构肝内分支的形态观测及临床意义

目的研究肝蒂内结构在肝内的分布状况,对肝叶及肝段进行量化分析;探讨肝脏手术时血管和胆管的保护及定位标志,为相关临床科室手术提供解剖学依据。方法取20例无肝病死亡后的人体肝脏标本及肝脏铸形标本,用游标卡尺和三角尺等进行有关数据的测量,所的数据用SPSS10.0软件进行统计学分析。结果肝蒂内结构入肝实质后三者以肝门静脉分支为主轴,攀附伴行。门静脉大多分为左、右干,部分右干缺如,且右干变异较大,肝管汇合方式常见为3型。结论肝脏血管丰富,解剖结构复杂,出血难以控制。肝脏的分叶与分段对于肝脏手术具体方式有指导作用。每一肝段都有它的单独管道系统,可以作为一个外科切除单位。