Gastroesophageal reflux disease

GERD is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, and its prevalence in Asia is increasing. Classical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation are common presentations. There is no standard criterion for the diagnosis of GERD, and 24-h pH monitoring lacks sensitivity in NERD. Furthermore, diagnostic studies for gastroesophageal reflux disease have several limitations. A short course of PPI is often used in clinical practice as a diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Elderly patients with GERD usually present with atypical manifestations, and they tend to develop more severe disease. PPI remains the mainstay of treatment for GERD. In a subset of patients who wish to discontinue maintenance treatment, anti-reflux surgery is a therapeutic option.     

Symptom assessment tools for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment

Relief of symptoms, both typical and atypical, is the mainstay of therapy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, evaluation of GERD symptoms' response to treatment has been hampered by the lack of a questionnaire that meets all the criteria of an ideal evaluative GERD symptom assessment tool. These criteria are: sensitivity in GERD patients, covering all symptom dimensions (multidimensional construct), assessment of frequency and intensity of "typical" and "atypical" GERD symptoms, practical and economical, easy to understand, responsive over short time intervals, use as a patient self-assessment tool, amenable to daily use, psychometrically validated, and translation into many languages with cross-cultural adaptation. Thus far, 14 instruments have been developed to assess GERD symptoms and potentially can be used to evaluate treatment response during a therapeutic trial in GERD patients. However, comparison of the different evaluative tools is needed.     

Esophageal pH monitoring, indications, and methods

Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem that affects a substantial proportion of the American population. It is estimated that the symptoms of GERD may afflict 40% to 45% of Americans each month. The diagnosis of GERD can be difficult, as its symptoms vary from typical symptoms like heartburn to atypical symptoms such as hoarseness, coughing, and chest pain. Most patients present with typical symptoms and are diagnosed with GERD if they respond to empiric trials of acid suppression. Many tests are available to help with diagnosing GERD in patients who either present with atypical symptoms or who do not respond to acid suppression; however, each test has its own shortcomings. The only test that directly measures whether acid is refluxing into the esophagus is the pH probe, but this test is uncomfortable for the patient, can be difficult to interpret, and may not be necessary in all cases. This article reviews the indications for pH monitoring, its technique, its advantages and limitations, and its role the diagnosis of GERD.     

Extraesophageal and atypical manifestations of GERD

Abstract   Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are essentially complications of GERD that primarily involve organs that are in proximity to the esophagus. Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is an atypical manifestation of GERD, because symptoms originate in essence from the esophagus. In both atypical and extraesophageal manifestation of GERD frequent heartburn is uncommon and lack of GERD symptoms is not unusual. Esophageal mucosal injury is rarely present making upper endoscopy a low-yield procedure in both conditions. While association with GERD has been commonly reported, the extent of causality remains unknown. In NCCP, the usefulness of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in diagnosing GERD-related NCCP has been established. Similar value in extraesophageal manifestations of GERD has been proposed, but rarely studied. While treatment of extraesophageal manifestations of GERD remains a challenge, PPIs in at least double the standard dose, should be considered for the initial therapy. Properly designed therapeutic studies are still lacking as well as the exact role of antireflux surgery in this patient population.     

Comparison of central and intraesophageal factors between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients and those with GERD‐related noncardiac chest pain

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of symptoms. Some patients present with typical symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation and others with atypical symptoms such as chest pain. The mechanism responsible for the varying clinical presentation of GERD is still not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate differences in central and local intraesophageal factors between patients with typical GERD symptoms and those with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Patients presenting with typical and atypical symptoms suspicious of GERD underwent upper endoscopy and 24‐hour pH monitoring with four sensors, each positioned at a different esophageal level. All patients completed GERD symptom, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Symptom Stress Rating questionnaires. From January 2006 to December 2009, 50 patients were recruited, 29 with typical symptoms, and 21 with NCCP. Patients with proven GERD and NCCP had higher proximal extension of acid during reflux episodes than patients with typical symptoms. They were found to be older, had a shorter history of symptom onset, worse anxiety scores, and more endoscopic findings compatible with gastritis. Proximal extension of acid during the reflux episodes in patients with GERD presenting with NCCP may play a role in symptom generation.     

Lansoprazole treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic laryngitis: a placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Previous uncontrolled studies suggested a therapeutic benefit for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) among patients with laryngitis. The present study is the first randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of gastric acid suppression among patients with laryngitis in the United States. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with idiopathic chronic laryngitis were randomized to receive either lansoprazole 30 mg p.o. b.i.d. or a matching placebo for 3 months. Before randomization, all patients underwent upper endoscopy, dual probe ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH-metry, and laryngoscopy, as well as completing a symptom questionnaire for GERD and laryngitis. The primary outcome of treatment was the complete resolution of laryngeal symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients with symptoms and signs of chronic laryngitis were enrolled, 20 of whom completed the study. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the two groups with regards to GERD symptoms, erosive esophagitis, proximal and distal esophageal pH-metry, or laryngeal signs and symptoms. In an intention-to-treat analysis, six patients in the lansoprazole group (50%) and only one patient (10%) in the placebo group achieved a complete symptomatic response, p = 0.04. Apart from receiving lansoprazole, there were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders in any of baseline esophageal or laryngeal signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical treatment with lansoprazole is efficacious in relieving symptoms of laryngitis compared to placebo. Such treatment can be considered as a first-line option in managing patients with idiopathic chronic laryngitis.     

Gastroesophageal reflux disease--state of the art

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as chronic symptoms or mucosal damage produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus; heartburn, its most common manifestation, occurs in 7% to 10% of the U.S. population on a daily basis. In addition, many so-called extraesophageal or atypical symptoms, including chronic cough, laryngitis and other otolaryngologic conditions, asthma, and unexplained chest pain, can be associated with GERD, but these patients appear to have a decreased frequency of heartburn, making the diagnosis of GERD difficult. All patients can be successfully managed with appropriate, titrated use of pharmacologic therapy. Antireflux surgery should thus be considered as an option only for patients who cannot afford or choose not to continue long-term medical therapy and for the rare patient with side effects or resistance to proton pump inhibitors. Endoscopic therapy for reflex should be considered as an experimental technology needing continuing evaluation.     

Effect of Antisecretory Therapy on Atypical Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on extraesophageal or atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of atypical manifestations in patients with acid reflux disease and the effect of PPI treatment. Patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of reflux were enrolled. Erosive esophagitis was stratified using the Los Angeles classification. Demographic data and symptoms were assessed using a questionnaire and included typical symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, odynophagia), and atypical symptoms (e.g., chest pain, sialorrhea, hoarseness, globus sensation, chronic coughing, episodic bronchospasm, hiccup, eructations, laryngitis, and pharyngitis). Symptoms were reassessed after a 3-month course of b.i.d. PPI therapy. A total of 266 patients with a first diagnosis of GERD (erosive, 166; non-erosive, 100) were entered in the study. Presentation with atypical symptoms was approximately equal in those with erosive GERD and with non-erosive GERD, 72% vs 79% (P = 0.18). None of the study variables showed a significant association with the body mass index. PPI therapy resulted in complete symptom resolution in 69% (162/237) of the participants, 12% (28) had improved symptoms, and 20% (47) had minimal or no improvement. We conclude that atypical symptoms are frequent in patients with GERD. A trial of PPI therapy should be considered prior to referring these patients to specialists.     

The association of gastroesophageal reflux disease with asthma and chronic cough in the adult

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition which is particularly prevalent in patients with asthma and chronic cough. Physiologic changes caused by asthma and chronic cough promote acid reflux. GERD is also considered by many investigators as a factor contributing to airway inflammation. An etiological relationship between GERD and asthma/chronic cough and vice versa has been supported by a large number of experimental and clinical findings and refuted by others. Although further controlled studies are needed to clarify this relationship, GERD and asthma/chronic cough appear to be linked to each other. The association of GERD with asthma and chronic cough involves nerve reflexes, cytokines, inflammatory and neuroendocrine cells and, in some patients, tracheal aspiration of refluxing gastric fluids. GERD may present with typical symptoms but can also be asymptomatic. Sensitive methods for diagnosing GERD are available, which include esophageal pH monitoring, acid provocative tests, modified barium swallow and endoscopy. Consideration of the association of GERD with asthma and chronic cough is of practical value in the management of chronic cough or asthma resistant to treatment. Treatment of GERD in patients with asthma has been consistently shown to improve respiratory symptoms but not necessarily pulmonary function tests. Surgical treatment can be a useful and cost-effective approach in selected patients with asthma and GERD.     

The clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with laryngeal symptoms who are referred to gastroenterology

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has increased recently in Asia‐Pacific countries. However, little is known about its prevalence and clinical characteristics in GERD patients with atypical symptoms in Asia. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of GERD in patients who had laryngeal symptoms in Korea. Data were gathered retrospectively from patients who presented with atypical symptoms, such as throat discomfort, globus pharyngeus, hoarseness, and chronic cough. They underwent a 24‐hour ambulatory intraesophageal pH monitoring and filled in a validated reflux questionnaire. Overall, 128 patients (36 men and 92 women) with laryngeal symptoms were included. Of these 128, 43 patients (34%) had erosive esophagitis or pathological reflux from 24‐hour ambulatory pH monitoring, and 24 (19%) had a positive Bernstein test or positive symptom index from 24‐hour pH monitoring. Sixty‐one patients (48%) had no evidence of reflux esophagitis on upper endoscopy and pathological acid reflux on 24‐hour pH monitoring. Fifty‐six patients (44%) had weekly heartburn or regurgitation. Typical symptoms and dyspepsia were significantly more common in patients with GERD who had laryngeal symptoms than non‐GERD. Fifty‐two percent of patients had laryngeal symptoms that were associated with GERD. The presence of typical reflux symptoms and dyspepsia are risk factors for GERD in patients who present with laryngeal symptoms.     

Use of pH-impedance testing to evaluate patients with suspected extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

GOALS: To report the use of pH-impedance testing in evaluating patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with atypical symptoms. BACKGROUND: Although the role of acid reflux in causing atypical GERD symptoms is generally accepted, the role, if any, of nonacid reflux is controversial, largely because until recently it has not been possible to detect nonacid reflux. The advent of intraluminal combined pH impedance testing (MII-pH), to detect nonacid reflux has heightened interest in its possible contribution to atypical symptoms. STUDY: Fifty consecutive patients referred for MII-pH testing to evaluate the cause of atypical symptoms presumed due to GERD were evaluated. The symptoms were either refractory to acid inhibition therapy or so atypical that further work up was desired by the referring physician. Patients underwent MII-pH testing to determine whether reflux was present, and, if so, if it was due to acid, nonacid, or gas. RESULTS: Only 16%, 22%, and 2% patients were found to have symptoms due to acid reflux, nonacid reflux, or both, respectively. Ten percent of these patients had gas reflux. MII-pH testing was useful in redirecting the management of patients who did not have reflux as the cause of their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: MII-pH testing is useful in determining whether gastroesophageal reflux is present in patients with atypical symptoms that have not responded to proton pump inhibitor therapy. It also distinguishes between reflux due to acid, nonacid, and gas, with consequences for management.     

Esophageal impedance–pH monitoring

Classical techniques like endoscopy and esophageal pH-metry are routinely used to study patients with symptoms related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although these techniques have been useful over the years both for diagnosis and therapeutic guidance, there are still many patients with typical or atypical GERD symptoms with normal endoscopy and pH-metry that do not respond adequately to antisecretory therapy. Ambulatory esophageal impedance-pH monitoring is a new technique that can be used to evaluate all types of gastroesophageal reflux, achieving higher rates of sensitivity and specificity than standard techniques. This review describes esophageal impedance-pH monitoring, summarizing the current literature on validation studies and clinical application.     

The utility of ambulatory pH monitoring in patients presenting with chronic cough and asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients presenting with asthma and chronic cough. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The charts of 358 consecutive patients who were referred for ambulatory gastroesophageal pH monitoring to the Lung Centre in Vancouver, British Columbia, were reviewed, and the data of 108 (30%) patients with asthma and 134 (37%) patients with chronic cough were analyzed. The maintenance treatment for GERD was discontinued before patients underwent the pH monitoring study. One hundred eighteen (33%) patients were excluded. RESULTS: Reflux episodes identified reflux events as the percentage of time where the pH was less than four. For asthma patients, 70 (64.8%) had distal total reflux, 50 (46.3%) had distal upright reflux, 41 (38.3%) had distal supine reflux and 73 (67.6%) had other distal refluxes. Proximal total reflux in asthmatic patients was present in 56 (52%), proximal upright reflux in 55 (51%) and proximal supine reflux in 56 (52%) patients. For chronic cough patients, 70 (52.6%) had distal total reflux, 59 (44.4%) had distal upright reflux, 45 (34.4%) had distal supine reflux and 75 (56%) patients had other distal refluxes. In chronic cough patients, proximal total reflux was present in 70 (52%), proximal upright reflux in 80 (60%) and proximal supine reflux in 59 (44%). Presenting respiratory and/or reflux symptoms were absent in approximately 25% of patients with asthma and reflux, and in approximately 50% of patients with chronic cough and reflux. During pH monitoring, symptoms did not differ significantly between those with and without distal reflux in both study groups, except for more significant heartburn in patients with chronic cough and reflux (RR 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: The data of the present study support the observation that there is a high prevalence of GERD in patients with asthma or chronic cough. The use of different pH parameters for detecting acid reflux during 24 h ambulatory pH monitoring, such as proximal esophageal acid measurement, should be considered as part of the routine interpretation of such testing. A low threshold for diagnosing GERD in patients with asthma or chronic cough is essential, because respiratory and/or reflux symptoms can be absent or atypical in some of these patients.     

Bronchopulmonale Manifestationen der gastroösophagealen Refluxerkrankung

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease in the western world. Usually it occurs with typical symptoms like heartburn and regurgitation, but almost every third GERD-patient presents with extraesophageal symptoms and diseases in which a causal relation with GERD is discussed. The extraesophageal symptoms possibly associated with GERD are chronic cough, bronchial asthma, sleep disturbances including obstructive sleep apnea, hoarseness, dental erosions, non-cardiac chest pain and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This article gives an overview of the reflux-associated diseases of the airways as well as the proposed pathomechanisms and therapeutic options.     

Definition and diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Abstract   With widespread treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, and that peptic ulcer diseases are no longer considered a chronic illness and are declining in most parts of the world, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) predominates the upper gastrointestinal disease spectrum. GERD is a well-defined condition. More innovative research in GERD in recent years led us to new conceptual frameworks on pathogenesis and novel diagnostic tests. The proton pump inhibitor test has evolved to become the diagnostic test of choice for the investigation of patients with the disease spectrum of GERD. Multi-channel intraluminal impedance with pH sensor allows the detection of pH episodes irrespective of their pH values (acid and nonacid reflux). It is useful to measure gastroesophageal reflux in the postprandial period, and in patients with persistent symptoms while on therapy and those with atypical symptoms.     

Barrett＇s esophagus： Prevalence and risk factors in patients with chronic GERD in Upper Egypt

AIM： To determine the prevalence and possible risk factors of Barrett＇s esophagus （BE） in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease （GERD） in EI Minya and Assuit, Upper Egypt. METHODS： One thousand consecutive patients with chronic GERD symptoms were included in the study over 2 years. They were subjected to history taking including a questionnaire for GERD symptoms, clinical examination and upper digestive tract endoscopy. Endoscopic signs suggestive of columnar-lined esophagus （CLE） were defined as mucosal tongues or an upward shift of the squamocolumnar junction. BF was diagnosed by pathological examination when specialized intestinal metaplasia was detected histologically in suspected CLE. pH was monitored in 40 patients. RESULTS： BE was present in 7.3% of patients with chronic GERD symptoms, with a mean age of 48.3 ± 8.2 years, which was significantly higher than patients with GERD without BE （37.4 ± 13.6 years）. Adenocarcinoma was detected in eight cases （0.8%）, six of them in BE patients. There was no significant difference between patients with BE and GERD regarding sex, smoking, alcohol consumption or symptoms of GERD. Patients with BE had significantly longer esophageal acid exposure time in the supine position, measured by pH monitoring. CONCLUSION： The prevalence of BE in patients with GERD who were referred for endoscopy was 7.3%. BE seems to be associated with older age and more in patients with nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux.     

Therapeutic flexible endoscopy replacing surgery: Part 2—Gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a complex entity whereby gastric contents reflux into the esophagus owing to either a lack of a natural barrier between the stomach and esophagus or a dysfunction of foregut motility. In many cases, elements of both are present. GERD presents with either typical or atypical symptoms and can lead to metaplasia of the esophageal epithelium, a precancerous condition called Barrett's esophagus (BE). GERD is a chronic disease, and like other chronic diseases, it requires a thorough evaluation to deduce the exact etiology and also necessitates a dynamic and evolving spectrum of therapy. Until relatively recently, the spectrum of treatment for chronic GERD and BE included lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and laparoscopic fundoplication. Considering the effect of chronic GERD on health and quality of life, and with further progress in understanding the disease process, newer and less invasive techniques for treatment have emerged and developed over the past decade. The 2 current FDA-approved therapies for the endolumenal treatment of GERD are transoral incisionless fundoplication with the Esophyx2 device and the Stretta system. If chronic GERD has lead to BE, endolumenal therapies include radiofrequency ablation with the HALO system or endoscopic resection of the metaplastic changes. Data regarding the outcomes of each of these procedures are accumulating rapidly; however, further data and evaluation are necessary to determine the most appropriate place for these procedures in the spectrum of therapy for chronic GERD and BE.     

Diagnostic approach to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

It is neither practical nor necessary to embark on a diagnostic evaluation of every patient with classic symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In most cases a well-taken history is usually sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of GERD and begin therapy. However, some patients may present with atypical symptoms; and many with classic symptoms are refractory to standard medical therapy. In these cases one must rely on diagnostic studies to confirm that abnormal acid reflux is present and potentially responsible for the symptoms in question. Modern technology has given us many different modalities to quantify esophageal acid exposure and determine whether symptoms are correlated to reflux events. Unfortunately, these studies are not perfect and the work-up of refractory patients typically requires more than one test. The goal of the following review will be to summarize the currently available techniques for diagnosis of GERD and also discuss the possible impact of new techniques, such as intraluminal impedance monitoring and wireless ambulatory pH monitoring.     

Surgery of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a competitive or complementary procedure?

The management of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has both been simplified and immensely improved by the development of modern medical therapies. These are built entirely on the concept of profound acid inhibition, which is very successful in a substantial proportion of GERD patients. Despite the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) some failures are unavoidable, and some patients experience incomplete control of major GERD symptoms on ordinary dosing of PPIs. Although the safety profile of PPIs is very reassuring, some people express some concern about the safety of drug treatment extending beyond 10 years especially when alternative therapeutic strategies are available. Some patients complain of alleged respiratory complications to severe reflux, and in those situations as well as in cases with e.g. Barrett's esophagus, a complete control of reflux also incorporating the duodenal components in the refluxate may be warranted. In all those situations antireflux surgery can be considered indicated for the treatment of chronic GERD and thus be looked upon as complementary to medical therapy. Furthermore, some patients who have their GERD symptoms under control on PPIs still want to have an operation to avoid dependency on drugs. Hence in none of these clinical situations does antireflux surgery play a competitive role in relation to medical therapy. However, in the very few randomized clinical trials in which a head-to-head comparison has been completed between medical and surgical therapy, the latter has been found to be somewhat more effective in terms of reflux control. The other side of the coin is that antireflux surgery has some side effects that signify the importance of this surgery being performed in specialized centers.     

Increased gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with severe COPD.

The prevalence and clinical consequences of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not well characterised. The present study prospectively studied 42 males with COPD (forced expiratory volume in one second % predicted: 35%, range 20-49) and 16 healthy volunteers of similar age without respiratory or gastro-oesophageal symptoms. The diagnosis of GERD was confirmed using oesophageal 24 h pH monitoring. In the current study group, reflux symptoms were measured using the Vigneri score, cough and dyspnoea with the modified Medical Research Council questionnaire, and pulmonary function with bronchodilator response and health status using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Pathological reflux was documented in 26 out of 42 patients (62%) and in three volunteers (19%). In patients with GERD, 15 patients (58%) did not report any reflux symptoms. There were no differences in symptoms, health status, bronchodilator treatment and pulmonary function test between patients with and without GERD. Oxygen desaturation coincided with episodes of increased oesophageal acidity in 40% of patients with GERD. Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have a high prevalence of asymptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux. The association between this reflux and oxygen desaturation deserves further attention.