Mutational analysis of the human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor subtype VPAC(2): role of basic residues in the second transmembrane helix

1. We investigated the role of two conserved basic residues in the second transmembrane helix arginine 172 (R172) and lysine 179 (K179) of the VPAC(2) receptor. 2. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) activated VPAC(2) receptors with an EC(50) value of 7 nM, as compared to 150, 190 and 4000 nM at R172L, R172Q and K179Q-VPAC(2) receptors, respectively. It was inactive at K179I mutated VPAC(2) receptors. These results suggested that both basic residues were probably implicated in receptor recognition and activation. 3. The VPAC(2)-selective VIP analogue, [hexanoyl-His(1)]-VIP (C(6)-VIP), had a higher affinity and efficacy as compared to VIP at the mutated receptors. 4. VIP, Asn(3)-VIP and Gln(3)-VIP activated adenylate cyclase through R172Q receptors with EC(50) values of 190, 2 and 2 nM, respectively, and through R172L receptors with EC(50) values of 150, 12 and 8 nM, respectively. Asn(3)-VIP and Gln(3)-VIP behaved as partial agonists at the wild type receptor, with E(max) values (in per cent of VIP) of 75 and 52%, respectively. In contrast, they were more efficient than VIP (E(max) values of 150 and 150% at the R172Q VPAC(2) receptors, and of 400 and 360% at the R172L receptors, respectively). These results suggested that the receptor's R172 and the ligand's aspartate 3 are brought in close proximity in the active ligand-receptor complex. 5. The K179I and K179Q mutated receptors had a lower affinity than the wild-type receptors for all the agonists tested in this work: we were unable to identify the VIP amino acid(s) that interact with K179.     

Different vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor domains are involved in the selective recognition of two VPAC(2)-selective ligands

A vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) analog, acylated on the amino-terminal histidine by hexanoic acid (C(6)-VIP), behaved as a VPAC(2) preferring agonist in binding and functional studies on human VIP receptors, and radioiodinated C(6)-VIP was a suitable ligand for binding studies on wild-type and chimeric receptors. We evaluated the properties of C(6)-VIP, its analog AcHis(1)-VIP, and the VPAC(2)-selective agonist Ro 25-1553 on the wild-type VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) receptors and on the chimeric receptors exchanging the different domains between both receptors. VIP had a normal affinity and efficacy on the chimeras starting with the amino-terminal VPAC(2) receptor sequence. The binding and functional profile of these chimeric receptors suggested that the high affinity of Ro 25-1553 for VPAC(2) receptors is supported by the amino-terminal extracellular domain, whereas the ability to prefer C(6)-VIP over VIP is supported by the VPAC(2) fifth transmembrane (TM5)-EC(3) receptor domain. These results further support the hypothesis that the central and carboxyl-terminal regions of the peptide (modified in RO 25-1553) recognize the extracellular amino-terminal region domain, whereas the amino-terminal VIP amino acids bind to the TM receptor core. VIP had a reduced affinity and efficacy on the N-VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) and on the N-->EC(2)-VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) chimeric receptors. C(6)-VIP behaved as a high-affinity agonist on these constructions. The antagonists [AcHis(1),D-Phe(2),Lys(15),Arg(16), Leu(27)]VIP(3-7)/GRF(8-27) and VIP(5-27) had comparable affinities for the wild-type receptors and for the two latter chimeras, supporting the hypothesis that these chimeras were properly folded but unable to reach the high-agonist-affinity, active receptor conformation in response to VIP binding.     

Characterization of a novel VPAC(1) selective agonist and identification of the receptor domains implicated in the carboxyl-terminal peptide recognition

Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) interacts with a high affinity to two subclasses of G protein coupled receptors named VPAC(1) and VPAC(2), and has a 3 - 10 fold preference for VPAC(1) over VPAC(2) receptors. Selective ligands for each receptor subclass were recently described. [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) and [L(22)]-VIP are two selective VPAC(1) agonists. Chimaeric human VPAC(2)-VPAC(1) recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells were used to identify the receptor domains implicated in these two selective ligands recognition. The VPAC(2) preference for [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 27) over [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) did not require the receptor's NH(2)-terminus domain but involved the whole transmembrane domain. In contrast, the selectivity of [L(22)]-VIP depended only on the presence of the NH(2) terminus and EC(2) domains of the VPAC(1) receptor. The present data support the idea that in the GPCR-B family of receptors the different selective ligands require different domains for their selectivity, and that the peptides carboxyl terminal sequence (amino acids 24 - 27) folds back on the transmembrane receptor domain, close to the peptides, aminoterminus.     

Serine 447 in the carboxyl tail of human VPAC1 receptor is crucial for agonist-induced desensitization but not internalization of the receptor

The VPAC1 receptor for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) belongs to the class II family of G protein-coupled receptors and is coupled to Gs protein/adenylyl cyclase. We assessed whether 10 different Ser/Thr residues in human VPAC1 receptor intracellular domains play a role in the process of VIP-induced desensitization/internalization by performing a site-directed mutagenesis study. The Ser/Thr residues mutated to Ala include potential G protein-coupled receptor kinase, protein kinase A and protein kinase C targets that are of particular interest for VPAC1 receptor desensitization. The data show that when Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing wild-type receptors were pretreated for 5 min with VIP (50 nM), receptor desensitization occurred with a 10-fold right shift of the ED50 for adenylyl cyclase activation. When the construct with the widest span of mutations was studied, there was no longer any short-term desensitization. By using constructs with fewer and fewer mutations, we identified Ser447 in the C-terminal tail to be crucial for rapid desensitization. We also showed that Ser447 plays an essential role for VIP-induced VPAC1 phosphorylation in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that none of the mutated Ser/Thr residues was involved in down-regulation after a 12-h treatment of cells with 50 nM VIP. Neither were they involved in VIP and VIP-induced receptor internalization as shown using a novel fluorescein-tagged VIP and VPAC1 receptor bearing a Flag epitope in the N-terminal domain and a green fluorescent protein at the C terminus. We conclude that Ser447, a likely G protein-coupled receptor kinase target, is crucial for VIP-induced phosphorylation and rapid desensitization of VPAC1 receptor.     

Receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in the goose cerebral cortex

Receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in the goose cerebral cortex were characterized using two approaches: (1) in vitro radioreceptor binding of [(125)I]-VIP, and (2) effects of peptides from the VIP/PACAP/secretin family on cyclic AMP formation. The binding of [(125)I]-VIP to goose cortical membranes was rapid, stable, and reversible. Saturation analysis resulted in a linear Scatchard plot, suggesting binding to a single class of receptor binding sites with a high affinity (K(d)=0.76 +/- 0.13 nM) and high capacity (B(max)=70 +/- 7 fmol/mg of protein). Various peptides displaced the specific binding of 0.12 nM [(125)I]-VIP to the goose cerebral cortical membranes in a concentration-dependent manner. The relative rank order of potency of the tested peptides to inhibit [(125)I]-VIP binding to the goose cerebrum was: PACAP(38) asymptotically equal to mammalian VIP > or = PACAP(27) asymptotically equal to chicken VIP > PHI (peptide histidine-isoleucine) > secretin (inactive). About 52% of specific [(125)I]-VIP binding sites in the goose cerebral cortex was sensitive to 5'-guanylimidodiphosphate [Gpp(NH)p], a nonhydrolyzable analogue of GTP. PACAP(38) and PACAP(27) potently stimulated cyclic AMP formation in the goose cerebral cortical slices in a concentration-dependent manner, displaying EC(50) values of 45.5 nM and 51.5 nM, respectively. Chicken VIP was markedly less potent than both forms of PACAP, mammalian VIP only weakly affected the nucleotide production, while effects evoked by PHI were negligible. It is concluded that the cerebral cortex of goose contains VPAC type receptors that are labeled with [(125)I]-VIP and are positively linked to cyclic AMP formation. In addition, the observed stronger action of PACAP, when compared to VIP, on cyclic AMP production in this tissue suggests its interaction with both PAC(1) and VPAC receptors.     

Heterogeneity of neuronal and smooth muscle receptors involved in the VIP- and PACAP-induced relaxations of the pig intravesical ureter

1. The mechanisms and receptors involved in the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)- and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP)-induced relaxations of the pig intravesical ureter were investigated. 2. VIP, PACAP 38 and PACAP 27 concentration-dependently relaxed U46619-contracted ureteral strips with a similar potency. [Ala(11,22,28)]-VIP, a VPAC(1) agonist, showed inconsistent relaxations. 3. The neuronal voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel inhibitor, omega-conotoxin GVIA (omega-CgTX, 1 microm), reduced the VIP relaxations. Urothelium removal or blockade of capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents, nitric oxide (NO) synthase and guanylate cyclase with capsaicin (10 microm), N(G)-nitro-l-arginine (l-NOARG, 100 microm) and 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ, 5 microm), respectively, did not change the VIP relaxations. However, the PACAP 38 relaxations were reduced by omega-CgTX, capsaicin, l-NOARG and ODQ. 4. The VIP and VIP/PACAP receptor antagonists, [Lys(1), Pro(2,5), Arg(3,4), Tyr(6)]-VIP (1 microm) and PACAP (6-38) (0.4 microm), inhibited VIP and VIP and PACAP 38, respectively, relaxations. 5. The nonselective and large-conductance Ca(2)-activated K(+) channel blockers, tetraethylammonium (3 mm) and charybdotoxin (0.1 microm), respectively, and neuropeptide Y (0.1 microm) did not modify the VIP relaxations. The small-conductance Ca(2)-activated K(+) channel blocker apamin (1 microm) did not change the PACAP 27 relaxations. 6. The cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) blocker, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate (Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS, 100 microm), reduced VIP relaxations. The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor rolipram and the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin relaxed ureteral preparations. The rolipram relaxations were reduced by Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS. Forskolin (30 nm) evoked a potentiation of VIP relaxations. 7. These results suggest that VIP and PACAP relax the pig ureter through smooth muscle receptors, probably of the VPAC(2) subtype, linked to a cAMP-PKA pathway. Neuronal VPAC receptors localized at motor nerves and PAC(1) receptors placed at sensory nerves and coupled to NO release, seem also to be involved in the VIP and PACAP 38 relaxations.     

Creation of a selective antagonist and agonist of the rat VPAC(1) receptor using a combinatorial approach with vasoactive intestinal peptide 6-23 as template

We have used combinatorial chemistry with amino acid mixtures (X) at positions 6 to 23 in vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) to optimize binding affinity and selectivity to the rat VPAC(1) receptor. The most efficient amino acid replacement was a substitution of alanine at position 18 to diphenylalanine (Dip), increasing the displacement efficiency of (125)I-VIP by 370-fold. The [Dip(18)]VIP(6-23) was subsequently used to find a second replacement, employing the same approach. Tyrosine at position 9 was selected and the resulting [Tyr(9),Dip(18)]VIP(6-23) analog has a K(i) value of 90 nM. This analog was unable to stimulate cAMP production at 10(-6) M but was able to inhibit VIP-induced cAMP stimulation (K(b) = 79 nM). The K(i) values of [Tyr(9),Dip(18)]VIP(6-23) using the rat VPAC(2) and PAC(1) receptors were 3,000 nM and >10,000 nM, respectively. Thus, [Tyr(9),Dip(18)]VIP(6-23) is a selective VPAC(1) receptor antagonist. The C-terminally extended form, [Tyr(9),Dip(18)]VIP(6-28), displays improved antagonistic properties having a K(i) and K(b) values of 18 nM and 16 nM, respectively. On the contrary, the fully extended form, [Tyr(9),Dip(18)]VIP(1-28), was a potent agonist with improved binding affinity (K(i) = 0.11 nM) and ability to stimulate cAMP (EC(50) = 0.23 nM) compared with VIP (K(i) = 1.7 nM, EC(50) = 1.12 nM). Furthermore, the specificity of this agonist to the VPAC(1) receptor was high, the K(i) values for the VPAC(2) and PAC(1) receptors were 53 nM and 3,100 nM, respectively. Seven other analogs with the [Tyr(9),Dip(18)] replacement combined with previously published VIP modifications have been synthesized and described in this work.     

VIP and PACAP are autocrine factors that protect the androgen-independent prostate cancer cell line PC-3 from apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal

1. In the present study, we describe the expression of the neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) as well as their receptors in PC-3 cells, a human prostate cancer cell line. In addition, we have investigated their role in apoptosis induced by serum starvation. 2. By RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry assays, we have demonstrated the production of VIP and PACAP in PC-3 cells. 3. We have demonstrated by RT-PCR and binding assays the expression of common PACAP/VIP (VPAC(1) and VPAC(2)) receptors, but not PACAP-specific (PAC(1)) receptors. The pharmacological profile of [(125)I]-VIP binding assays was as follows: VPAC(1) antagonist=VPAC(1) agonist>VIP>VPAC(2) agonist (IC(50)=1.2, 1.5, 2.3 and 30 nM, respectively). In addition, both receptor subtypes are functional since VIP, PACAP-27 or VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) agonists all increased the intracellular levels of cAMP. 4. The expression of both peptides and their receptors is similar in serum-cultured and serum-deprived PC-3 cells. The treatment of serum-deprived PC-3 cells with exogenous VIP or PACAP-27 increases cell number and viability in a dose-dependent manner, as demonstrated by cellular counting and MTT assays. The increased cell survival is exerted through the VPAC(1) receptor, since a VPAC(1), but not VPAC(2), receptor agonist, mimics the effects and a VPAC(1) receptor antagonist blocks it. Moreover, VIP and PACAP-27 inhibit genomic DNA fragmentation in PC-3 cells triggered by serum starvation, and increase the immunoreactivity of the antiapoptotic protein bcl-2. 5. Our results suggest that VIP and PACAP are autocrine/paracrine factors that protect PC-3 cells from apoptosis through VPAC1 receptors.     

Lysine 195 and aspartate 196 in the first extracellular loop of the VPAC1 receptor are essential for high affinity binding of agonists but not of antagonists

The role in ligand recognition and receptor activation of two adjacent charged residues (lysine 195 and aspartate 196) in the first extracellular loop of the human VPAC(1) receptor was investigated in stably transfected CHO cells expressing the wild type or point mutated receptors.Replacement of lysine 195 by glutamine or of aspartate 196 by asparagine reduced the agonists' ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity; VIP behaved like a partial agonist and a partial agonist behaved as an antagonist. The receptor's capacity to recognize agonists was reduced but antagonists' affinity was unaffected. Both results suggesting that the two charged residues are essential for VPAC(1) receptor activation. On the other hand, the double mutant was less severely affected than single mutants suggesting that hydrogen bonds may partially compensate the loss of charged residues. But the inversion of the residues affected receptor recognition and activation more markedly suggesting that the two charged residues do not interact directly.     

Neuronal and smooth muscle receptors involved in the PACAP- and VIP-induced relaxations of the pig urinary bladder neck

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide 38 (PACAP 38)- and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) are widely distributed in the urinary tract, the current study investigated the receptors and mechanisms involved in relaxations induced by these peptides in the pig bladder neck. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Urothelium-denuded strips were suspended in organ baths for isometric force recordings and the relaxations to VIP and PACAP analogues were investigated. KEY RESULTS: VIP, PACAP 38, PACAP 27 and [Ala(11,22,28)]-VIP produced similar relaxations. Inhibition of neuronal voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels reduced relaxations to PACAP 38 and increased those induced by VIP. Blockade of capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents (CSPA), nitric oxide (NO)-synthase or guanylate cyclase reduced the PACAP 38 relaxations but failed to modify the VIP responses. Inhibition of VIP/PACAP receptors and of voltage-gated K(+) channels reduced PACAP 38 and VIP relaxations, which were not modified by the K(+) channel blockers iberiotoxin, charybdotoxin, apamin or glibenclamide. The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor rolipram and the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin produced potent relaxations. Blockade of protein kinase A (PKA) reduced PACAP 38- and VIP-induced relaxations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: PACAP 38 and VIP relax the pig urinary bladder neck through muscle VPAC(2) receptors linked to the cAMP-PKA pathway and involve activation of voltage-gated K(+) channels. Facilitatory PAC(1) receptors located at CSPA and coupled to NO release, and inhibitory VPAC receptors at motor endings are also involved in the relaxations to PACAP 38 and VIP, respectively. VIP/PACAP receptor antagonists could be useful in the therapy of urinary incontinence produced by intrinsic sphincter deficiency.     

Pharmacological properties of Chinese hamster ovary cells coexpressing two vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors (hVPAC1 and hVPAC2)

1. In the light of recent findings that VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors form homodimers and heterodimers, we have evaluated the function of these receptors coexpressed in the same cells, using whole-cell and membrane preparations. Cells expressing each receptor alone were used for comparison. 2. The study was performed on Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with both human recombinant receptors and we compared receptor occupancy and adenylate cyclase activation by VIP, Ro 25-1553 - a VPAC2 selective agonist - and [K(15),R(16),L(27)]VIP(1-7)/GRF(8-27) - a VPAC1 selective agonist - on membranes prepared from each cell line and on a mixture of membranes from cells expressing each receptor individually. We also studied receptor internalization induced by the three agonists on intact cells expressing both receptors alone or together by fluorescence-activated cell sorting using monoclonal antibodies and demonstrated by using co-immunoprecipitation that the two receptors did interact.3. The results indicated that coexpression of the receptors did not modify the recognition of ligands, nor the capacity of the agonists to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity and, in intact cells, to induce internalization of the receptors.4. As a consequence, the properties of the selective ligands that were established on cell lines expressing a single population of VIP receptors were valid on cells expressing both receptors. Furthermore, the recently demonstrated VPAC1/VPAC2 receptor heterodimerization did not affect the function of either receptor.     

Tonic adenosine A1 and A2A receptor activation is required for the excitatory action of VIP on synaptic transmission in the CA1 area of the hippocampus

Adenosine can regulate synaptic transmission through modulation of the action of other neurotransmitters. The influence of adenosine on VIP enhancement of synaptic transmission in hippocampal slices was investigated. Facilitation of fEPSP slope by 1 nM VIP (23.3+/-1.3%) was turned into an inhibition (-12.1+/-3.4%) when extracellular endogenous adenosine was removed using adenosine deaminase (ADA, 1U/ml). Blockade of adenosine A(1) receptors with 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX, 10 nM) or of A(2A) receptors with ZM241385 (20 nM) attenuated the effect of VIP. When both DPCPX and ZM241385 were present the effect of VIP was abolished. In the presence of ADA, selective A(1) receptor activation with N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 15 nM) or A(2A) receptor-activation with CGS21680 (10 nM) partially readmitted the excitatory effect of VIP on fEPSPs. In contrast, facilitation of PS amplitude by 1 nM VIP (19.1+/-1.2%) was attenuated in the presence of ADA or DPCPX but was not changed by ZM241385. CPA, in the presence of ADA, fully restored the effect of VIP on PS amplitude. In conclusion, VIP facilitation of synaptic transmission to hippocampal pyramidal cell dendrites is dependent on both A(1) and A(2A) receptor activation by endogenous adenosine. VIP effects on PS amplitude are only dependent on A(1) adenosine receptor activation. This differential sensitivity to adenosine modulation might be due to the different VIP circuits contributing to VIP effects on pyramidal cell dendrites and pyramidal cell bodies.     

Activation of VPAC1 receptors by VIP and PACAP-27 in human bronchial epithelial cells induces CFTR-dependent chloride secretion

1. In the human airway epithelium, VIP/PACAP receptors are distributed in nerve fibers and in epithelial cells but their role in transepithelial ion transport have not been reported. Here, we show that human bronchial epithelial Calu-3 cells expressed the VPAC(1) receptor subtype which shares similar high affinity for VIP and PACAP-27. 2. The stoichiometric binding parameters characterizing the (125)I-VIP and (125)I-PACAP-27 binding to these receptors were determined. 3. We found that VIP (EC(50) approximately 7.6 nM) and PACAP-27 (EC(50) approximately 10 nM) stimulated glibenclamide-sensitive and DIDS-insensitive iodide efflux in Calu-3 cells. 4. The protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, H-89 and the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, chelerythrine chloride prevented activation by both peptides demonstrating that PKA and PKC are part of the signaling pathway. This profile corresponds to the pharmacological signature of CFTR. 5. In the cystic fibrosis airway epithelial IB3-1 cell lacking functional CFTR but expressing VPAC(1) receptors, neither VIP, PACAP-27 nor forskolin stimulated chloride transport. 6. Ussing chamber experiments demonstrated stimulation of CFTR-dependent short-circuit currents by VIP or PACAP-27 applied to the basolateral but not to the apical side of Calu-3 cells monolayers. 7. This study shows the stimulation in human bronchial epithelial cells of CFTR-dependent chloride secretion following activation by VIP and PACAP-27 of basolateral VPAC(1) receptors.     

Identification of potent and selective neuropeptide Y Y(1) receptor agonists with orexigenic activity in vivo

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) binds to a family of G-protein coupled receptors termed Y(1), Y(2), Y(3), Y(4), Y(5), and y(6). The use of various receptor subtype-selective agonists and antagonists has facilitated identification of the receptor subtypes responsible for mediating many of the biological effects of NPY. For example, the potent orexigenic activity of NPY is believed to be mediated by both the Y(1) and Y(5) receptor subtypes. Several selective Y(5) receptor agonists that stimulate food intake in rodents are available, but no selective Y(1) receptor agonist has been reported. We have identified several NPY analogs that bind the NPY Y(1) receptor with high affinity and exhibit full agonist activity, measured as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in cells expressing the cloned NPY Y(1) receptor. [D-Arg(25)]-NPY, [D-His(26)]-NPY, Des-AA(10--17)[Cys(7,21),Pro(34)]-NPY, Des-AA(11--18)[Cys(7,21),D-Lys(9)(Ac)]-NPY, Des-AA(11--18)[Cys(7,21),D-Lys(9)(Ac),Pro(34)]-NPY, Des-AA(11--18)[Cys(7,21),D-Lys(9)(Ac),D-His(26)]-NPY and Des-AA(11--18)[Cys(7,21),D-Lys(9)(Ac),D-His(26), Pro(34)]-NPY bind the NPY Y(1) receptor with K(i) values of 0.9 +/- 0.2, 2.0 +/- 0.3, 0.2 +/- 0.05, 0.7 +/- 0.1, 0.2 +/- 0.01, 2.2 +/- 0.3, and 1.2 +/- 0.3 nM, respectively, and inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP production with EC(50) values of 0.2 +/- 0.02, 0.5 +/- 0.04, 0.3 +/- 0.03, 0.5 +/- 0.05, 0.4 +/- 0.16, 5.3 +/- 0.32, and 5.1 +/- 0.97 nM, respectively. These peptides are highly selective for the NPY Y(1) receptor relative to the NPY Y(2), Y(4), and Y(5) receptors. [D-Arg(25)]-NPY, [D-His(26)]-NPY and Des-AA(11--18)[Cys(7,21), D-Lys(9)(Ac),D-His(26),Pro(34)]-NPY stimulate food intake dose-responsively in Long-Evans rats for at least 4 h after intracerebroventricular administration. Although the involvement of Y(1) receptors in several physiological activities, such as vasoconstriction and anxiolysis, remains to be investigated, adequate tools are now available.     

Evidence for VIP(1)/PACAP receptors in the afferent pathway mediating surgery-induced fundic relaxation in the rat

We previously reported activation of an inhibitory adrenergic and a non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) pathway during abdominal surgery relaxing the rat gastric fundus. In the present study, we investigated the possible role of nitric oxide (NO) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the NANC part of the surgery-induced fundic relaxation. The effect of the NO biosynthesis inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG), the non-selective VIP receptor antagonist [D-p-Cl-Phe(6),Leu(17)]-VIP and the selective VIP(1) receptor antagonist [Acetyl-His(1),D-Phe(2),Lys(15),Arg(16), Leu(17)]-VIP was investigated on the non-adrenergic fundic relaxation induced by manipulation of the small intestine followed by resection of the caecum. Guanethidine partly reduced the manipulation-induced fundic relaxation. Addition of L-NOARG reduced this non-adrenergic component, whereas the non-selective VIP receptor antagonist had no significant effect. Combination of L-NOARG and the non-selective VIP antagonist however further reduced the relaxation to manipulation. The selective VIP(1) receptor antagonist reduced the mean and maximal relaxation induced by abdominal surgery in the presence of guanethidine. When combined with L-NOARG, the relaxation of the gastric fundus was almost completely abolished. The VIP(1) receptor antagonist alone had no significant effect on the mean and maximal relaxation, but enhanced recovery of fundic tone. In conclusion, as VIP(1) receptors are not present in the rat gastric fundus, these results suggest that the NANC inhibitory pathway activated during abdominal surgery involves VIP(1) receptors, most likely in the afferent limb. The inhibitory neurotransmitters released at the level of the gastric fundus smooth muscle are NO and a substance different from VIP.     

An evaluation of the efficacy of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide antagonists in vivo in the anaesthetized dog

The effectiveness of competitive peptide vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) receptor antagonists was evaluated on heart rate in the anaesthetized dog. Two specific antagonists, VIP (6-28) and [D-p-Cl-Phe(6), Leu(17)]-VIP, and a nonspecific antagonist, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide fragment (6-27) (PACAP), were studied. VIP (6-28) and [D-p-Cl-Phe(6), Leu(17)]-VIP (100 microg i.c.) increased the heart rate, whereas PACAP (100 microg i.c.) reduced the baseline heart rate. All three shifted the VIP dose-response curve to the right by two- to threefold for 30 min. In conclusion, PACAP, VIP (6-28), and [D-p-Cl-Phe(6), Leu(17)]-VIP have a direct effect on the heart rate, are equally effective, and the effects last approximately 30 min in vivo.     

Diisothiocyanate derivatives as potent, insurmountable antagonists of P2Y6 nucleotide receptors

The physiological role of the P2Y(6) nucleotide receptor may involve cardiovascular, immune and digestive functions based on the receptor tissue distribution, and selective antagonists for this receptor are lacking. We have synthesized a series of symmetric aryl diisothiocyanate derivatives and examined their ability to inhibit phospholipase C (PLC) activity induced by activation of five subtypes of recombinant P2Y receptors. Several derivatives were more potent at inhibiting action of UDP at both human and rat P2Y(6) receptors expressed in 1321N1 human astrocytes than activation of human P2Y(1), P2Y(2), P2Y(4) and P2Y(11) receptors. The inhibition by diisothiocyanate derivatives of 1,2-diphenylethane (MRS2567) and 1,4-di-(phenylthioureido) butane (MRS2578) was concentration-dependent and insurmountable, with IC(50) values of 126+/-15 nM and 37+/-16 nM (human) and 101+/-27 nM and 98+/-11 nM (rat), respectively. A derivative of 1,4-phenylendiisothiocyanate (MRS2575) inhibited only human but not rat P2Y(6) receptor activity. MRS2567 and MRS2578 at 10microM did not affect the UTP (100nM)-induced responses of cells expressing P2Y(2) and P2Y(4) receptors, nor did they affect the 2-methylthio-ADP (30nM)-induced responses at the P2Y(1) receptor or the ATP (10microM)-induced responses at the P2Y(11) receptor. Other antagonists displayed mixed selectivities. The selective antagonists MRS2567, MRS2575 and MRS2578 (1microM) completely blocked the protection by UDP of cells undergoing TNFalpha-induced apoptosis. Thus, we have identified potent, insurmountable antagonists of P2Y(6) receptors that are selective within the family of PLC-coupled P2Y receptors.     

Domains determining agonist selectivity in chimaeric VIP2 (VPAC2)/PACAP (PAC1) receptors

1 The VPAC2 and PAC1 receptors are closely related members of the Group II G protein-coupled receptor family. At the VPAC2 receptor, VIP is equipotent to PACAP-38 in stimulating cyclic AMP production, whereas at the PAC1 receptor PACAP-38 is many fold more potent than VIP. In this study, domains which confer this selectivity were investigated by constructing four chimaeric receptors in which segments of the VPAC2 receptor were exchanged with the corresponding segment from the PAC1 receptor. 2 When expressed in COS 7 cells all the chimaeric receptors bound the common ligand [125I]PACAP-27 and produced cyclic AMP in response to agonists. 3 Relative selectivity for agonists was determined primarily by the amino terminal extracellular domain of the PAC1 receptor and the VPAC2 receptor. The interchange of other domains had little effect on the potency of PACAP-38 or PACAP-27. 4 For chimaeric constructs with a PAC1 receptor amino terminal domain, the substitution of increasing portions of the VPAC2 receptor decreased the potency of VIP yet increased that of helodermin. 5 This suggests that the interaction of VIP/helodermin but not PACAP with the PAC1 receptor may be influenced (and differentially so) by additional receptor domains.     

A systematic comparison of intracellular cyclic AMP and calcium signalling highlights complexities in human VPAC/PAC receptor pharmacology

VPAC/PAC receptor activation classically results in cyclic-AMP production, with limited reports evaluating calcium signalling. These studies systematically characterise intracellular cyclic-AMP ([cAMP](i)) and calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) responses in CHO-cells expressing recombinant human (h) VPAC/PAC receptors (hVPAC(1)R, hVPAC(2)R, hPAC(1)R), using two simple, non-radioactive, HT-amenable assays. The rank order of potency (ROP) of the agonists VIP, PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 was similar in both assays for each individual receptor subtype, although potencies (EC(50)) in the [Ca(2+)](i) assay were approximately 100-fold lower. Importantly, this shift was also evident in SHSY-5Y cells endogenously expressing hPAC(1)R. Furthermore, [Ala(11,22,28)]VIP and maxadilan were selective hVPAC(1)R and hPAC(1)R agonists, respectively, and although R3P65 had no demonstrable hVPAC(2)R selectivity, these compounds exhibited comparable reductions in [Ca(2+)](i) EC(50) values. In contrast, PG97-269 and PG99-465, putatively selective hVPAC(1)R and hVPAC(2)R antagonists, respectively, were marginally less potent in [cAMP](i) studies, whereas M65 was equipotent at hPAC(1)R. Moreover, PG99-465 alone increased [cAMP](i) at all three hVPAC/PAC receptor subtypes, with full hVPAC(1)R and hPAC(1)R agonism. With equivalent agonist ROPs generated in both assays, [Ca(2+)](i) signalling provides an alternative approach to examine hVPAC/PAC receptor pharmacology. However, these studies underscore the paucity of receptor selective compounds, complexities in comparing drug potencies across assays, and the pleiotropic nature of VPAC/PAC-receptor signalling.