Live births after management of severe OHSS by GnRH antagonist administration in the luteal phase

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of ovarian stimulation protocols. Currently, no curative therapy exists and the main preventive option is cycle cancellation. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration in the luteal phase was recently proposed as a new approach for the management of patients with established severe OHSS. Three polycystic ovarian syndrome patients undergoing IVF treatment developed severe OHSS, diagnosed 6 days after oocyte retrieval. On day 6, the patients underwent blastocyst transfer and received GnRH antagonist for 4 days, combined with luteal phase support using exogenous oestradiol and progesterone. Two patients had successful pregnancies that resulted in births of healthy infants, while one patient had a biochemical pregnancy. In all patients, established severe OHSS regressed to a moderate form of the syndrome, no pregnancy-induced life-threatening OHSS was observed, while a short monitoring period was required at an outpatient level, avoiding the need for patient hospitalization. This is the first report in the literature on GnRH antagonist administration in the luteal phase, combined with embryo transfer and exogenous oestradiol and progesterone supplementation. This novel treatment was effective in the regression of established severe OHSS, and resulted in the birth of healthy infants.     

Controlled natural cycle IVF with antagonist use and blastocyst transfer

A method of controlled natural cycle IVF (CONCIVF) was sought to provide simpler and shorter treatment without the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies. A total of 138 couples with normal ovulation and normal sperm parameters, in whom the women were <40 years old, were the candidates for this study. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist was used before human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration if LH increased to a concentration of 10 mIU/ml before HCG injection. Treatment was initiated at > or =16 mm follicular growth and at oestradiol concentrations > or =400 pmol/l with 5000 IU HCG induction. All the embryos were cultured to the blastocyst stage and transferred only if they reached early or advanced blastulation. A total of 126 patients underwent oocyte retrieval. In 102 cases, one oocyte was retrieved; 95% of the oocytes fertilized, 99% cleaved and 47.9% achieved the blastocyst stage. The implantation rate per blastocyst transfer was 53.3% and the live-birth rate per embryo transfer was 40%. Therefore, CONCIVF with blastocyst transfer gives acceptable blastocyst development and implantation rates without the long- or short-term side effects of ovulation induction.     

GnRH agonist trigger and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: relook at ‘freeze-all strategy’

A case is reported of early onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger for final oocyte maturation in a GnRH antagonist protocol. The use of GnRHa in place of HCG as a trigger for final oocyte maturation in an antagonist IVF cycle has been proposed as a method for preventing OHSS in predicted high-responders. This approach, however, did not prevent the occurrence of OHSS in our case despite a freeze-all strategy. To the best of our knowledge, this is a possible index case of severe OHSS with GnRHa trigger for oocyte maturation without any luteal HCG rescue for a high responder, despite IVF cycle segmentation.     

Double GnRH-antagonist dose before HCG administration may prevent OHSS in oocyte-donor cycles: a pilot study

This pilot study evaluated the possibility of preventing early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by increasing the daily dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration (to twice a day) in oocyte-donor cycles stimulated with the antagonist protocol. The study included 72 oocyte donors who underwent ovarian stimulation using the GnRH antagonist protocol and might have had their cycle cancelled because of ovarian hyper-response. All women were donors presenting a rapid rise of oestradiol ?3000 pg/ml early in the stimulation period with more than 15 follicles of ?15 mm in diameter. By decreasing the rFSH dose to 75 IU a day with an additional daily dose of GnRH antagonist (0.25 mg twice a day), the oestradiol concentrations were lowered or reached a plateau before human chorionic gonadotrophin was given. A marked decrease in oestradiol concentrations and ovarian volume was observed on the day of oocyte retrieval and 3 days post retrieval. None of the donors needed coasting, were cancelled or developed OHSS. In over-responding oocyte donors, by increasing the usual GnRH-antagonist dose to twice a day during ovarian stimulation, the oestradiol rise can be blocked while a minimal follicular stimulation may continue without the risk of developing OHSS or affecting the outcome.This study was conducted in order to investigate whether GnRH antagonist (Ganirelix) may prevent the early OHSS by doubling the daily dose in oocyte donor cycles stimulated with the antagonist protocol. Seventy two oocyte donors at high risk for OHSS were included in the study that might have their cycle cancelled because of ovarian hyperesponse. All cases were donors presenting significantly elevated or rapidly rising serum estradiol levels E2 ? 3000 pg/ml with more than 15 follicles none of which had the appropriate diameter to be considered mature for triggering ovulation. By decreasing the rFSH dose to 75IU a day with an additional daily dose of GnRH antagonist (0.25 twice a day) the estradiol levels were lowered or reached a plateau before the hCG was given. A marked decrease of estradiol levels and ovarian volume was observed the day of oocyte retrieval and three days post retrieval. None of the donors needed coasting, were cancelled or developed OHSS.In conclusion, in oocyte donors at high risk for OHSS, by increasing to twice a day the usual GnRH-antagonist dose one or two days before hCG administration, the estradiol rise could be blocked while a minimal follicular stimulation may continue without the risk of developing OHSS or affecting the outcome.     

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome associated with long-acting GnRH agonist in oncofertility patients

PurposeTo report three cases of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) among oncofertility patients receiving a long-acting GnRH agonist for ovarian suppression after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with a GnRH antagonist protocolMethodsChart abstraction was completed for three patients at a single academic medical center. Patients included were undergoing fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic chemotherapy. All patients underwent COH with GnRH antagonist protocol and embryo cryopreservation immediately followed by ovarian suppression with long-acting GnRH agonist. Main outcome measure was development of OHSS.ResultsDespite using GnRH agonist trigger and freezing all embryos, patients developed ascites, intermittent hyponatremia and hemoconcentration consistent with severe early-onset OHSS after receiving long-acting GnRH agonist immediately following oocyte retrieval for ovarian preservation.ConclusionsRisk of severe OHSS may be increased when a long-acting GnRH agonist is used for ovarian suppression immediately following oocyte retrieval. A delay in initiating long-acting GnRH agonist after oocyte retrieval in patients at high risk for developing OHSS should be considered.     

Combined modalities for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following an excessive response to stimulation

Although the classification and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) are well described in the literature, little attention has been given to modalities that aim to prevent its occurrence. In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate whether a combination of modalities in addition to GnRH agonist triggering in GnRH antagonist cycles could result in better prevention of OHSS. The study included 170 hyperresponder patients who were stimulated with GnRH antagonist protocol and were triggered with GnRH agonist for final oocyte maturation. Freeze all embryos was performed in all patients. The intervention group included treatment with dopamine agonist and restarting the GnRH antagonist. Of the 170 patients included, 63 were included in the intervention group. Compared to no intervention, women in the intervention group were more likely to have: menses within 7?days of the oocyte retrieval, smaller ovarian diameter, the absence of free pelvic fluid, less hemoconcentration and higher serum sodium levels. It can be concluded that combining other modalities in addition to triggering with GnRH agonist in GnRH antagonist cycles, results in targeting several pathways that lead to OHSS and result in rapid resolution of signs of ovarian hyperstimulation.     

Prevention of OHSS

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major complication of ovulation induction. As the treatment of the syndrome is currently empirical, prevention is the most important aspect of its management. Identification of patients vulnerable to developing OHSS by taking a history of previous OHSS and polycystic ovarian syndrome is the first step in prevention. The use of mild stimulation protocols with small doses of gonadotrophin is also important. As gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol is associated with a lower risk of OHSS, antagonist could be the protocol of choice in high-risk patients. Withholding human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and continuation of GnRH agonist will abort the syndrome but at the expense of loss of the cycle. Coasting, which involves stoppage of gonadotrophins until oestradiol drops to a low concentration before HCG injection, is an effective technique but it does not completely prevent OHSS. Intravenous albumin is useful in the prevention when given at time of oocyte retrieval. Cryopreservation of all embryos will reduce late-onset OHSS but not early-onset OHSS. In-vitro maturation of oocytes will avoid ovarian stimulation and totally prevent OHSS. Triggering ovulation with a lower dose of HCG is effective in reducing the incidence of OHSS. There are possible roles for metformin and dopamine agonist for prevention of OHSS.     

Withdrawal of GnRH agonist decreases oestradiol and VEGF concentrations in high responders

This study evaluated whether the withdrawal of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist before triggering ovulation reduces the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high-risk infertility patients who were treated with gonadotrophins. GnRH agonist was withdrawn for 2 or 3 days when dominant follicles were ?14 mm in diameter, according to the GnRH agonist long protocol. Non-withdrawal of GnRH agonist was used as control. The serum concentration of oestradiol on the ovulation trigger day was significantly decreased in the GnRH agonist withdrawal group compared with the control group (5750.78 ± 2344.77 pg/ml versus 8076.43 ± 1981.67 pg/ml); however, the number of retrieved oocytes and the fertilization rate were similar between the groups. In addition, the concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor in plasma on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration and follicular fluid on the oocyte retrieval day were decreased following GnRH agonist withdrawal. In fresh embryo transfer cycles, rates of clinical pregnancy, implantation and OHSS were not different between the groups. When GnRH agonist withdrawal was followed by total embryos cryopreserved, the rate of OHSS was decreased compared with the control group (0% versus 8.70%). Clinical pregnancy rates in cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles were comparable between the two groups.This study was a prospective, clinical and laboratory study of 96 patients (corresponding to 96 cycles) with high antral follicle counts, who were at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation. The study was carried out between May and September 2012. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist was withdrawn in 47 cycles for 2 or 3 days when the dominant follicles were ?14 mm in diameter, according to the GnRH agonist long protocol. The non-withdrawal of GnRH agonist in 49 cycles was used as the control. The serum concentrations of oestradiol on the ovulation trigger day were significantly decreased in the GnRH agonist withdrawal group compared with the control group (5750.78 ± 2344.77 pg/ml versus 8076.43 ± 1981.67 pg/ml; P < 0.001); however, the numbers of retrieved oocytes and fertilization rates were similar between the two groups. In addition, the concentrations of VEGF in plasma on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration and follicular fluid on the oocyte retrieval day were decreased following GnRH agonist withdrawal. In fresh embryo transfer cycles, the rates of clinical pregnancy, implantation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were not different between the two groups. When GnRH agonist withdrawal was followed by cryopreservation of all embryos, the rate of OHSS was decreased compared with the control group (0% versus 8.70%). Clinical pregnancy rates in vitrified–warmed embryo transfer cycles were comparable between the two groups. The appropriate withdrawal of GnRH agonist, before triggering ovulation, decreased the concentrations of oestradiol and VEGF in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation, which may reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation.     

GnRH agonist to induce oocyte maturation during IVF in patients at high risk of OHSS

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) to trigger oocyte maturation in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) or previous high response. The outcome of ovarian stimulation and IVF in patients using GnRHa to trigger oocyte maturation after co-treatment with GnRH antagonist (study group) was compared with patients using human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) to trigger oocyte maturation after a dual pituitary suppression protocol with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) and GnRHa overlap (control group). All patients received intramuscular progesterone for luteal support but patients in the study group received additional supplementation with oestradiol patches. The mean number of oocytes, proportion of mature oocytes and fertilization rate were similar between the study and control groups. Implantation rate (38.6% versus 45.1%), clinical pregnancy rate (69.6% versus 60.9%) and delivery rate (62.5% versus 56.5%) were similar in the study and control groups respectively. There was one case of moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in the control group and none in the study group. GnRHa is effective in triggering oocyte maturation in patients with PCOS or previous high response. Further randomized studies are required to evaluate its effectiveness in the prevention of OHSS in this group of patients.     

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception: a Cochrane review

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists suppress gonadotrophin secretion resulting in dramatic reduction in treatment cycle duration. Assuming comparable clinical outcomes, these benefits may justify changing the standard long GnRH agonist protocol to GnRH antagonist regimens. To evaluate the evidence, databases (e.g. Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE) were electronically searched, hand searches were performed, and manufacturers in the field were contacted. Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCT) fulfilled inclusion criteria for comparison of GnRH antagonist with long GnRH agonist protocol. Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy/live-birth rate were significantly lower in the antagonist group (P = 0.009; OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95 and P = 0.02; OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.97 respectively). Conversely, incidence of severe OHSS was significantly reduced with the antagonist protocol (P = 0.01; OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.88), and interventions to prevent OHSS were administered more frequently in the agonist group (P = 0.03; OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.92). Concluding, GnRH antagonist protocols are short, simple, with good clinical outcomes and significant reduction in severe OHSS incidence and gonadotrophin amount; however, the lower pregnancy rate compared with the GnRH agonist long protocol necessitates counselling subfertile couples before recommending change from GnRH agonist to antagonist.     

Luteal phase support with GnRH agonist does not eliminate the risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Abstract

This study aims to report a case of early, severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) following GnRH agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation despite luteal support with a GnRH agonist. Contrary to the claim that luteal support using a GnRH agonist eliminates the risk for OHSS in high-risk patients, this report alerts practitioners to the risk of severe OHSS development despite GnRH agonist luteal support in patients receiving GnRH antagonist protocol with GnRH agonist triggering and cautions the practitioners to consider other measures of OHSS prevention.     

Repeated GnRH agonist doses for luteal support: a proof of concept

Research questionWhat are the safety and feasibility of repeated subcutaneous doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for luteal support in IVF cycles triggered by a GnRH agonist?DesignIn this prospective trial, patients exhibiting oestradiol concentrations of over 2500 pg/ml after use of a GnRH agonist for triggering ovulation were initially randomized to GnRH agonist luteal support (0.1 mg subcutaneously every other day, starting on day 3 after embryo transfer) or to a control group supported by 80 µg of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) on day 3 after embryo transfer. All patients underwent a day 5 blastocyst transfer. Randomization to the HCG luteal support was stopped owing to two cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and the study was continued solely with GnRH agonist luteal support.ResultsThe study included 39 women in the repeated GnRH agonist luteal support group and seven in the HCG micro dose group. There were no cases of OHSS among patients supported by a GnRH agonist, and no other adverse events were recorded. There were no cases of bleeding before the pregnancy test, and hence no cases of an insufficient luteal phase. A clinical pregnancy rate of 43.6% was achieved with GnRH agonist luteal support. Hormone dynamics during the stimulation cycle reflected rising LH and progesterone concentrations after the introduction of GnRH agonist support.ConclusionsRepeated doses of GnRH agonist every other day as a method of luteal support provided safe and effective luteal support for women who underwent GnRH agonist triggering in a GnRH antagonist IVF cycle.     

Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles

A retrospective study was conducted in a private infertility centre to evaluate the rate of complications in a large oocyte donation programme. A total of 4052 oocyte retrievals were performed between January 2001 and October 2007. Altogether, 1238 cycles (30.6%) were stimulated with the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and in 2814 cycles (69.4%) the GnRH antagonist protocol was used. The GnRH antagonist treated cycles were triggered with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) or a GnRH agonist in 1295 and 1519 cycles, respectively. Complications related to oocyte retrieval occurred in 17 patients (0.42%) (intra-abdominal bleeding: n = 14, severe pain: n = 2, ovarian torsion: n = 1). Fourteen of these were hospitalized (0.35%) and six donors (0.15%) required surgical intervention. Pelvic infections, injury to pelvic structures or anaesthesiological complications were not observed in this series. Moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred in 22 donors; 11 required hospital admission and 11 were managed on an outpatient basis. All cases were related to HCG triggering (0.87%). Serious complications related to oocyte retrieval occurred at a low rate in healthy young donors. The risk of OHSS can be substantially reduced by specific stimulation protocols, which include GnRH agonist triggering. Prospective oocyte donors should be adequately counselled about the risks related to egg donation.     

Antagonist rescue of agonist IVF cycle at risk of OHSS: a case series

We describe a series of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) long protocol cycles presenting a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which were rescued with an antagonist at a university-based tertiary-care fertility centre. Nineteen IVF patients presenting a risk of OHSS during treatment with long protocol, between 2009 and November 2012 were included in the present study. After discussion of available options, the agonist was stopped and a daily gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist injection was initiated (“rescue protocol”) and maintained until ovulation trigger. Fourteen patients were triggered with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and five with GnRH agonist bolus, yielding competent oocytes. Seventeen embryo transfers were performed in the fresh cycles. One patient developed moderate OHSS. There were eight clinical pregnancies after the fresh IVF cycle (42% per patient), and six further pregnancies after frozen-thawed cycles, resulting in a 73% cumulative clinical pregnancy rate within one year. We conclude that the “rescue protocol with antagonist” of the long IVF cycle with a high risk of OHSS allows us to carry on with the cycle, without compromising its success or the patient safety, thus broadening the possibility of applying the long protocol.     

GnRH agonist trigger with intensive luteal phase support vs. human chorionic gonadotropin trigger in high responders: an observational study reporting pregnancy outcomes and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

A retrospective, cohort study of high-risk patients undergoing IVF treatment was performed to assess if there is a difference in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, when a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger with intensive luteal support is compared to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) with standard luteal support. The control group consisted of 382 high-risk patients having a GnRH antagonist protocol with 194 receiving an hCG trigger. All patients had?≥18 follicles?≥11mm or serum oestradiol?>18,000pmol/l on the day of trigger. Patients had a single or double embryo transfer at cleavage or blastocyst stage. Logistic regression was used to adjust for differences between the groups. An intention-to-treat analysis of all cycles was performed. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Only one patient (0.3%) was hospitalized with severe OHSS in the GnRHa group, compared to 26 patients (13%) in the hCG group. In conclusion, GnRHa trigger is associated with similar pregnancy rates with hCG trigger and a significant reduction in hospitalization for severe OHSS after an intention to treat analysis was performed.     

Intensified ovarian stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol with agonist triggering: a prospective, clinical feasibility study

The threat of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and the increase in discomfort for the patient has limited the feasibility of maximizing the oocyte yield per treatment cycle. A gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with agonist triggering and vitrification of all 2PN oocytes can eliminate the risk of OHSS. This prospective, single-centre, cohort study in 30 good-responder IVF patients ≤ 36 years reports the feasibility of arbitrarily intensifying stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol in terms of tolerability, safety and efficacy. Ovarian stimulation was performed with 225-375IU FSH, induction of final oocyte maturation with 0.2mg GnRH agonist followed by vitrification of all 2 pronuclear (2PN) oocytes and repetitive vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles. Main outcomes were severe OHSS incidence, tolerability, assessed by a questionnaire, and cumulative live birth rate. On average, 17 oocytes were retrieved (range 4-42) and 8.4 oocytes at the 2PN stage were cryopreserved (range 3-22). No case of severe OHSS was observed (0%, 95 CI 0-11.4%). Tolerability was good. The cumulative live birth rate per patient undergoing at least one vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was 26.9% (7/26, 95% CI 13.7-46.1%). This approach can be explored in future larger-sized controlled studies.     

Ovulation triggering with GnRH agonist vs. hCG in the same egg donor population undergoing donor oocyte cycles with GnRH antagonist: a prospective randomized cross-over trial

Objective  To compare fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles triggered for final oocyte maturation with either human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist in the same donor population in two sequential stimulation cycles. Design  Prospective randomized cross-over trial. Setting  Private infertility clinic. Patient(s)  Eighty-eight stimulation cycles in 44 egg donors. Interventions  Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with hCG or GnRH agonist (leuprolide acetate 0.15 mg) in the same egg donors in two consecutive cycles. Main outcome measure(s)  The primary outcome measure was the proportion of mature and fertilized oocytes per donor cycle. Secondary outcome measures were implantation and pregnancy rates in the recipients and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in oocyte donors. Result(s)  The proportion of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes and mean embryo scores were comparable between the two triggering agents. While implantation (36.53% vs, 32.93%), pregnancy (69.08% vs. 68.81%) and clinical pregnancy (41.3% vs. 40.2%) rates were comparable for the groups, the incidence of OHSS was significantly lower in GnRH than in hCG triggered cycles. Conclusion(s)  Fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates from donor oocytes stimulated with GnRH antagonist protocol were identical for donor cycles triggered with hCG and GnRH agonist. GnRH antagonist triggering in egg donors was associated with lower rates of OHSS. This is the first prospective randomized cross-over study supporting the hypothesis that GnRH agonist is an effective alternative to hCG for the final oocyte maturation in oocyte donor cycles and should be the method of choice, especially for donors with evident risk factors for OHSS.     

Combination of cabergoline and embryo cryopreservation after GnRH agonist triggering prevents OHSS in patients with extremely high estradiol levels—a retrospective study

Purpose

Embryo cryopreservation after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in GnRH antagonist protocols has been proposed to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, a small percentage of patients still developed severe OHSS. The purpose of the study was to investigate the efficacy of preventing OHSS in patients at very high risk when cabergoline was given in addition to elective cryopreservation after GnRHa triggering.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. The patients were stimulated with GnRH antagonist protocol. When serum E₂ concentration was >6,000 pg/ml and there were more than 20 follicles ≥11 mm on the day of final oocyte maturation, GnRHa was used to trigger oocyte maturation. Cabergoline was given to augment the effect of preventing OHSS. The embryos were electively cryopreserved by vitrification and thawed in subsequent cycles. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of severe OHSS. The secondary outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate in the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle.

Results

One hundred and ten patients underwent 110 stimulated cycles were included for analysis. No patients developed moderate/severe OHSS. Mean E₂ concentration on the day of final oocyte maturation was 7,873 pg/ml, and an average of 22.7 oocytes was obtained from each patient. One hundred and ten thawing cycles were performed, resulting in 69 clinical pregnancies (62.7 %).

Conclusions

Combining cabergoline and embryo cryopreservation after GnRHa triggering in GnRH antagonist protocol could prevent OHSS in patients at very high risk.     

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome- an optimal solution for an unresolved enigma

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The syndrome almost always presents either after hCG administration in susceptible patients or during early pregnancy. Despite many years of clinical experience, there are no precise methods to completely prevent severe OHSS, except by withholding the ovulation-inducing trigger of hCG. Recently, COH which combining GnRH antagonist co-treatment and GnRH agonist trigger has become a common tool aiming to eliminate severe early OHSS. However, the observed decrease in implantation and pregnancy rates following this approach has encouraged different modifications of luteal support aiming to improve outcome. One of the suggest approach is the 1500 IU hCG luteal rescue, which appears to be a promising protocol, aiming to reduce (rather than eliminating) severe early OHSS, without compromising outcome. In the present paper we discuss the different suggested strategies and offer a strict triage, aimed at eliminating the occurrence of severe OHSS based on several clinical observations, including the role of GnRH-antagonist in COH protocols, the use of different luteal rescue protocols and the ability to transfer embryos in the blastocyst stage.     

Prediction of ovarian reserve based on day-3 serum follicle stimulating hormone concentrations during the pituitary suppression cycle using a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Satisfactory results following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatments depend on retrieving an appropriate number of mature oocytes without causing the development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The present study was carried out to investigate whether the ovarian reserve is predictable based on the day-3 serum concentration of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) during the pituitary suppression cycle using a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (defined as day-3 FSH) in patients undergoing IVF-ET treatment. Day-3 FSH before the administration of gonadotropin was assessed in 72 IVF-ET cycles from 59 infertile women. The mean+/-SD of day-3 FSH, the total amount of FSH plus human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) administered, and the total number of oocytes retrieved was 5.5+/-2.6 mIU/ml, 2834.2+/-1236.5 IU and 7.7+/-5.8, respectively. There were significant correlations between day-3 FSH and the total amount of FSH-hMG administered (p < 0.001), and day-3 FSH and total number of oocytes retrieved (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference of day-3 FSH between patients who subsequently conceived (4.4+/-1.3 mIU/ml) and those who did not conceive (6.1+/-2.9 mIU/ml) (p = 0.001). There was also a significant difference of day-3 FSH between patients who developed moderate or severe OHSS (4.5+/-1.2 mIU/ml) and those who did not (5.9+/-2.8 mIU/ml) (p = 0.003). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis showed that the significant cut-off point for day-3 FSH for predicting ovarian reserve was 5.25 mIU/ml. These findings indicate that day 3-FSH is usefulfor predicting ovarian reserve during the pituitary suppression cycle using a GnRH agonist in patients undergoing IVF-ET.