A phase I clinical trial of a new 5-valent rotavirus vaccine

We conducted a phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a new 5-valent oral rotavirus vaccine's safety and immunogenicity profiles. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 3 orally administered doses of a live-attenuated human-bovine (UK) reassortant rotavirus vaccine, containing five viral antigens (G1, G2, G3, G4 and G9), or a placebo. The frequency and severity of adverse events were assessed. Immunogenicity was evaluated by the titers of anti-rotavirus IgA and the presence of neutralizing antibodies anti-rotavirus. No severe adverse events were observed. There was no difference in the frequency of mild adverse events between experimental and control groups. The proportion of seroconversion was consistently higher in the vaccine group, for all serotypes, after each one of the doses. The 5-valent vaccine has shown a good profile of safety and immunogenicity in this small sample of adult volunteers.     

Evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of HNVAC,an MDCK-based H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine,in Phase I single centre and Phase II/III multi-centre,double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled,parallel assignment studies

The clinical evaluation of the MDCK-based H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine HNVAC in adults aged 18–65 years is reported. In the Phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre study, 160 subjects were parallelly assigned 3:1 to vaccine:placebo groups (n = 60:20) with both the aluminium hydroxide adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccine formulations. A single dose of both the formulations containing 15 μg of haemagglutinin protein showed minimal adverse reactions, the most common of which were pain at injection site (11.67%) and fever (10.00%). Both formulations produced 74–81% seroprotection (SRP: titre of ≥40), 67–70% seroconversion (SRC: four-fold increase in titres between days 0 and 21), and a four-fold increase in geometric mean titres (GMT). Aluminium hydroxide did not have a significant effect either on immunogenicity or on reactogenicity. Nevertheless, based on its recognized positive effects on the stability and immunogenicity of many vaccines, and its marginal benefit in both pre-clinical and Phase I studies of HNVAC, alum adjuvanted HNVAC was further tested in a staggered Phase II/III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study of 200 and 195 subjects, respectively, parallelly assigned 4:1 to adjuvanted vaccine and placebo groups. In these studies, the most common adverse reactions were pain at injection site (6.88% and 5.77% in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively) and fever (7.50% and 7.05%, respectively), and a single dose resulted in 87–90% SRP, 85–86% SRC, and a nearly six-fold increase in GMT, meeting or exceeding licensing criteria. It is concluded that HNVAC is safe and immunogenic to adults of 18–65 years.     

Cross-protective immunity against multiple influenza virus subtypes by a novel modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectored vaccine in mice

Development of an influenza vaccine that provides cross-protective immunity remains a challenge. Candidate vaccines based on a recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) viral vector expressing antigens from influenza (MVA/Flu) viruses were constructed. A vaccine candidate, designated MVA/HA₁/C13L/NP, that expresses the hemagglutinin from pandemic H1N1 (A/California/04/09) and the nucleoprotein (NP) from highly pathogenic H5N1 (A/Vietnam/1203/04) fused to a secretory signal sequence from vaccinia virus was highly protective. The vaccine elicited strong antibody titers to homologous H1N1 viruses while cross-reactive antibodies to heterologous viruses were not detectable. In mice, this MVA/HA₁/C13L/NP vaccine conferred complete protection against lethal challenge with A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1), A/Norway/3487-2/09 (pandemic H1N1) or A/Influenza/Puerto Rico/8/34 (seasonal H1N1) and partial protection (57.1%) against challenge with seasonal H3N2 virus (A/Aichi/68). The protective efficacy of the vaccine was not affected by pre-existing immunity to vaccinia. Our findings highlight MVA as suitable vector to express multiple influenza antigens that could afford broad cross-protective immunity against multiple subtypes of influenza virus.     

Phase 1/2 clinical trial of COVID-19 vaccine in Japanese participants: A report of interim findings

We initiated a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the S-268019-b recombinant protein vaccine, scheduled as 2 intramuscular injections given 21 days apart, in 60 randomized healthy Japanese adults. We evaluated 2 regimens of the S-910823 antigen (5 μg [n = 24] and 10 μg [n = 24]) with an oil-in-water emulsion formulation and compared against placebo (n = 12). Reactogenicity was mild in most participants. No serious adverse events were noted. For both regimens, vaccination resulted in robust IgG and neutralizing antibody production at days 36 and 50 and predominant T-helper 1-mediated immune reaction, as evident through antigen-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell responses with IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-4 production on spike protein peptides stimulation. Based on the interim analysis, the S-268019-b vaccine is safe, produces neutralizing antibodies titer comparable with that in convalescent serum from COVID-19-recovered patients. However, further evaluation of the vaccine in a large clinical trial is warranted.     

Safety,tolerability and immunogenicity of a mammalian cell-culture-derived influenza vaccine: A sequential Phase I and Phase II clinical trial

This sequential, observer-blind, randomised, single-centre, combined Phase I and Phase II clinical trial compared the tolerability and immunogenicity of a single intramuscular dose of a novel cell-culture-derived influenza vaccine (CCIV), produced in Madin–Darby canine kidney cells, with a conventional egg-based vaccine. The immunogenicity of both vaccines was assessed by SRH assay, a well-recognized test by EMEA, in compliance with the requirements of the EU Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). The Phase I part of the trial comprised 40 healthy adults (18–40 years of age); the subsequent Phase II part involved 200 healthy adult (n = 80, 18–60 years of age) and elderly (n = 120, ≥61 years of age) subjects. Both vaccines showed similar reactogenicity and any solicited local or systemic reactions were mostly mild or moderate. Regarding immunogenicity, both the CCIV and the control vaccine met all of the EU Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use criteria for influenza vaccines for each strain and in both age groups. In conclusion, the CCIV produced in mammalian cell-culture is as well tolerated and as immunogenic as the control egg-based vaccine in non-elderly and elderly adults.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a novel human Enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase I clinical trial

There is an urgent need for a novel vaccine that is effective against human Enterovirus 71 (EV71) outbreaks. A double-blind, randomized controlled study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a human EV71 vaccine in healthy adults, children and infants. The vaccine dosages were 200 U and 400 U for children and adults, and 100 U, 200 U and 400 U for infants. Subjects were randomized to receive different dosages of the vaccine or placebo. Adults received intramuscular injection on Days 0, 14 and 28. Children and Infants received on Days 0, 28 and 56. The novel human EV71 inactivated vaccine was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in healthy volunteers, especially in infant populations. For immune response, the seropositive rates (with titers ≥≥1:8) of neutralizing antibody [NTAb] increased to 100% for all dosage groups after the second vaccination. For NTAb seronegative infants before vaccination, after one dose, the NTAb GMTs were 29.7 (95% CI, 13.1-67.2), 10.1 (95% CI, 6.6-15.3), and 27.4 (95% CI, 14.3-52.2) in the 100 U, 200 U, and 400 U vaccine groups, respectively; after two doses, the GMTs were 114.1 (95% CI, 44.5-292.4), 159.5 (95% CI, 49.3-515.3), and 509.0 (95% CI, 181.3-1429.1), respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01273246 and NCT01273233.     

Randomized,double-blind,Phase 1 trial of an alphavirus replicon vaccine for cytomegalovirus in CMV seronegative adult volunteers

Development of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine is a priority. We evaluated a two component alphavirus replicon particle vaccine expressing CMV gB or a pp65/IE1 fusion protein, previously shown to induce robust antibody and cellular immune responses in mice, in a randomized, double-blind Phase 1 clinical trial in CMV seronegative subjects. Forty subjects received a lower dose (LD) or higher dose (HD) of vaccine or placebo by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 8 and 24. The vaccine was well tolerated, with mild to moderate local reactogenicity, minimal systemic reactogenicity, and no clinically important changes in laboratory parameters. All vaccine recipients developed ex vivo, direct IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to CMV antigens (maximal mean spot-forming cells per 10⁶ PBMC in LD and HD groups of 348 and 504 for pp65, 83 and 113 for IE1, and 138 and 114 for gB), and neutralizing antibodies (maximal geometric mean titer 110 with LD and 218 with HD). Polyfunctional CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell responses were detected by polychromatic flow cytometry. This alphavirus replicon particle vaccine was safe and induced neutralizing antibody and multifunctional T cell responses against three CMV antigens that are important targets for protective immunity.     

Safety and immunogenicity of an improved oral inactivated multivalent enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) vaccine administered alone and together with dmLT adjuvant in a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled Phase I study

BackgroundWe have developed a new oral vaccine against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), which is the most common cause of bacterial diarrhea in children in developing countries and in travelers.MethodsThe vaccine was tested for safety and immunogenicity alone and together with double-mutant heat-labile toxin (dmLT) adjuvant in a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I study in 129 Swedish adults. The vaccine consists of four inactivated recombinant E. coli strains overexpressing the major ETEC colonization factors (CFs) CFA/I, CS3, CS5, and CS6 mixed with an LT B-subunit related toxoid, LCTBA. Volunteers received two oral doses of vaccine alone, vaccine plus 10 μg or 25 μg dmLT or placebo. Secretory IgA antibody responses in fecal samples and IgA responses in secretions from circulating intestine-derived antibody secreting cells were assessed as primary measures of vaccine immunogenicity.ResultsThe vaccine was safe and well tolerated; adverse events were few and generally mild with no significant differences between subjects receiving placebo or vaccine with or without adjuvant. As many as 74% of subjects receiving vaccine alone and 83% receiving vaccine plus 10 μg dmLT showed significant mucosal IgA responses to all five primary vaccine antigens and about 90% of all vaccinees responded to at least four of the antigens. Subjects receiving vaccine plus 10 μg dmLT responded with significantly increased intestine-derived anti-CS6 responses compared to subjects receiving vaccine alone.ConclusionsThe vaccine was safe and broadly immunogenic. dmLT further enhanced mucosal immune responses to CF antigens present in low amounts in the vaccine. Based on these encouraging results, the vaccine will be tested for safety and immunogenicity in different age groups including infants in Bangladesh and for protective efficacy in travelers.     

Safety and immunogenicity in man of a cell culture derived trivalent live attenuated seasonal influenza vaccine: A Phase I dose escalating study in healthy volunteers

Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) offers the promise of inducing a variety of immune responses thereby conferring protection to circulating field strains. LAIVs are based on cold adapted and temperature sensitive phenotypes of master donor viruses (MDVs) containing the surface glycoprotein genes of seasonal influenza strains. Two types of MDV lineages have been described, the Ann Arbor lineages and the A/Leningrad/17 and B/USSR/60 lineages. Here the safety and immunogenicity of a Madin Darby Canine Kidney – cell culture based, intranasal LAIV derived from A/Leningrad/17 and B/USSR, was evaluated in healthy influenza non-naive volunteers 18–50 years of age. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design, single escalating doses of 1 × 10⁵, 1 × 10⁶, or 1 × 10⁷ tissue culture infectious dose 50% (TCID₅₀) of vaccine containing each of the three influenza virus re-assortants recommended by the World Health Organization for the 2008–2009 season were administered intranasally. A statistically significant geometric mean increase in hemagglutination inhibition titer was reached for influenza strain A/H3N2 after immunization with all doses of LAIV. For the A/H1N1 and B strains, the GMI in HI titer did not increase for any of the doses. Virus neutralization antibody titers showed a similar response pattern. A dose–response effect could not be demonstrated for any of the strains, neither for the HI antibody nor for the VN antibody responses. No influenza like symptoms, no nasal congestions, no rhinorrhea, or other influenza related upper respiratory tract symptoms were observed. In addition, no difference in the incidence or nature of adverse events was found between vaccine and placebo treated subjects. Overall, the results indicated that the LAIV for nasal administration is immunogenic (i.e. able to provoke an immune response) and safe both from the perspective of the attenuated virus and the MDCK cell line from which it was derived, and it warrants further development.     

Clinical development of a Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine

Background

Cell culture technologies have the potential to improve the robustness and flexibility of influenza vaccine supply and to substantially shorten manufacturing timelines. We investigated the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of a Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine and utilized these studies to establish a serological correlate of vaccine protection.

Methods

Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III trials were undertaken in the US during the 2008–2009 Northern hemisphere influenza season, in young (18–49 years) and older (50–64 years and ≥65 years) adult subjects. 7250 young adults were randomized 1:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or placebo. 3210 older adult subjects were randomized 8:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or a licensed egg-derived vaccine. Serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers were assessed 21 days post-vaccination. Vaccine efficacy in preventing cell culture-confirmed influenza infection was determined for the young adult population. Local and systemic adverse events were recorded in both studies.

Results

The Vero-derived vaccine was safe and well tolerated in both young and older adults. All US and European immunological licensing thresholds were comfortably met in both populations. Vaccine efficacy in young adults was 79% against A/H1N1 viruses antigenically matching the corresponding vaccine strain and 78.5% for all antigenically matched influenza viruses. A hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer of ≥1:15 provided a reliable correlate of protection for the Vero-derived influenza vaccine, with no additional benefit at titers >1:30. Bridging of the correlate of protection established in the young adult population to the older adult immunogenicity data demonstrated the likely effectiveness of the Vero-derived vaccine in the older adult population.

Conclusions

A Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine is safe, immunogenic and protects against infection with influenza virus. The novel vaccine technology has the potential to make a substantial contribution to improving influenza vaccine supply.

Clinical trial registration

The studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00566345 and NCT00782431.     

Evaluation of safety and efficacy as an adjuvant for the chitosan-based vaccine delivery vehicle ViscoGel in a single-blind randomised Phase I/IIa clinical trial

ViscoGel, a chitosan-based hydrogel, has earlier been shown to improve humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in mice. In this study, a Phase I/IIa clinical trial was conducted to primarily evaluate safety and secondarily to study the effects of ViscoGel in combination with a model vaccine, Act-HIB to Haemophilus influenzae type b, administered as a single intramuscular injection. Healthy volunteers of both sexes, ages 22–50 and not previously vaccinated to HIB, were recruited. The trial had two phases. In Phase A, three ascending dose levels of ViscoGel (25, 50 and 75 mg) were evaluated for safety in 3 × 10 subjects. Phase B had a single-blind, randomised, parallel-group design evaluating safety and efficacy in five groups, 20 subjects/group, comparing vaccination with 0.2 μg or 2 μg Act-HIB alone or combined with ViscoGel (50 mg) and one group receiving the standard Act-HIB dose (10 μg). No safety or tolerability concerns were identified. Local, transient reactions at the injection site were the most common adverse events. These were more frequent in groups receiving Act-HIB + ViscoGel, while other AEs were recorded at similar frequency in Act-HIB and Act-HIB + ViscoGel groups. Efficacy was evaluated by measuring serum anti-HIB antibodies and cellular responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). There was a large variation in baseline anti-HIB antibody titres and no adjuvant effect was observed on the anti-HIB antibody production in groups vaccinated with Act-HIB + ViscoGel. ELISpot analyses revealed increased interferon-γ (IFN-γ) responses to Act-HIB in PBMCs from subjects vaccinated with Act-HIB in combination with ViscoGel, compared to groups receiving Act-HIB alone. Moreover, ViscoGel counteracted an inhibitory effect of Act-HIB vaccination on the IFN-γ response to both the vaccine itself and an irrelevant influenza antigen. In summary, ViscoGel was found to be safe and well-tolerated, supporting further examination of ViscoGel as a new innovative vehicle for vaccine development.     

A novel peptide-based pan-influenza A vaccine: A double blind,randomised clinical trial of immunogenicity and safety

BackgroundFP-01.1 is a novel synthetic influenza A vaccine consisting of six fluorocarbon-modified 35-mer peptides that encapsulate multiple CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell epitopes and is designed to induce an immune response across a broad population.MethodsFP-01.1 was evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, phase I clinical study in healthy adult volunteers (n = 49). IFNγ ELISpot assays and multicolour flow cytometry were used to characterise the immune response.ResultsFP-01.1 was safe and well tolerated at all doses tested with a similar adverse event profile in actively vaccinated subjects compared with controls. Maximum immunogenicity was in the 150 μg/peptide dose group where a robust response (243 spots/million PBMC) was demonstrated in 75% subjects compared with 0% in placebo controls. All six peptides were immunogenic. FP-01.1 induced dual CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and vaccine-specific T cells cross-recognise divergent influenza strains.ConclusionsThis first-in-human study showed that FP-01.1 has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and generated robust anti-viral T cell responses in a high proportion of subjects tested. The results support the further clinical testing of FP-01.1 prior to clinical, proof-of-concept, live viral challenge studies.     

Results from a preclinical study in rodents and a Phase 1/2, randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,parallel-group study of COVID-19 vaccine S-268019-a in Japanese adults

BackgroundIn early 2020, developing vaccines was an urgent need for preventing COVID-19 from a contingency perspective.MethodsS-268019-a is a recombinant protein-based vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), comprising a modified recombinant spike protein antigen adjuvanted with agatolimod sodium, a Toll-like receptor-9 agonist. In the preclinical phase, it was administered intramuscularly twice at a 2-week interval in 7-week-old mice. Immunogenicity was assessed, and the mice were challenged intranasally with mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 at 2 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the second immunization. After confirming the preclinical effect, a Phase 1/2, randomized, parallel-group clinical study was conducted in healthy adults (aged 20–64 years). All participants received 2 intramuscular injections at various combinations of the antigen and the adjuvant (S-910823/agatolimod sodium, in μg: 12.5/250, 25/250, 50/250, 25/500, 50/500, 100/500, 10/500, 100/100, 200/1000) or placebo (saline) in an equivalent volume at a 3-week interval and were followed up until Day 50 in this interim analysis.ResultsIn the preclinical studies, S-268019-a was safe and elicited robust immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralizing antibody responses in mice. When challenged with SARS-CoV-2, all S-268019-a-treated mice survived and maintained weight until 10 days, whereas all placebo- or adjuvant-treated (without antigen) mice died within 6 days. In the Phase 1/2 trial, although S-268019-a was well tolerated in adult participants, was safe up to Day 50, and elicited robust anti-spike protein IgG antibodies, it did not elicit sufficient neutralizing antibody levels.ConclusionsThe S-268019-a vaccine was not sufficiently immunogenic in Japanese adults despite robust immunogenicity and efficacy in mice. Our results exemplify the innate challenges in translating preclinical data in animals to clinical trials, and highlight the need for continued research to overcome such barriers. (jRCT2051200092)     

Influenza vaccine effectiveness among adult patients in a University of Lyon hospital (2004-2009)

The aim of this study was to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza among hospitalized patients. A case-control investigation was based on the prospective surveillance of influenza-like illness (ILI) during five flu seasons. We compared influenza-positive cases and influenza-negative controls. Unadjusted overall IVE was 62% (95% confidence interval 24% to 81%). We found that IVE was lower during the 2004-05 flu season (11%; 95% CI −232% to 76%) when the vaccine and circulating viruses were mismatched. Expansion of the study to other hospitals could provide IVE estimates earlier in the season, for different age groups and emerging virus strains.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hemagglutinin influenza-flagellin fusion vaccine (VAX125) in healthy young adults

Background

The need for worldwide seasonal and pandemic vaccine production has increased interest in the development of innovative technologies for influenza vaccine production. We evaluated a novel influenza vaccine consisting of the globular head of the HA1 domain of the A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (H1N1) influenza virus (VAX125) genetically fused to the TLR5 ligand, flagellin, and produced in E. coli.

Methods

128 healthy adult subjects 18–49 years old were enrolled in a clinical trial conducted in three stages at a single center. Stage 1 was an open-label, dose escalation study in which the VAX125 vaccine was administered intramuscularly (im) at doses of 0.1 μg, 0.3 μg, 1 μg, 2 μg, 3 μg, 5 μg and 8 μg to groups of 8 subjects each. Stage 2 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which subjects were randomized to receive 1.0 μg and 2.0 μg VAX125 vaccine doses or placebo, with 16 subjects per group. Finally, an additional 24 subjects received a 0.5 μg dose of VAX125 in stage 3, which was a non-randomized, open label study. In all parts subjects were followed for adverse events and sera was tested by hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) and microneutralization (MN) against egg-grown virus on days 0, 7, 14, and 28. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), cytokine levels, and anti-flagellin antibody were also assessed.

Results

Vaccine was generally well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. Pain at the injection site was the most common local adverse event, and was mild or moderate in intensity. Systemic symptoms after vaccination include fatigue and headache, and two subjects, who received either 3 or 8 μg, had moderately severe systemic symptoms accompanied by substantial increases in serum CRP. Serum antibody responses against SI were seen by HAI and MN in most study subjects, with the geometric mean titer of post vaccination antibody increasing in a dose-dependent fashion. Overall, four-fold or greater serum HAI responses were seen in 61 of 96 (64%) subjects who received doses of 0.5 μg or greater, including in 46 of 72 subjects who received doses from 0.5 μg to 2 μg.

Conclusions

The globular head of the influenza HA expressed in a prokaryotic system was able to induce a functional antibody response against native virions. Vigorous responses were seen at relatively low doses of HA antigen suggesting that the addition of flagellin provided a substantial adjuvanting effect. The high levels of immune response at low doses of antigen and the relative ease of production associated with E. coli expression suggests that this approach may represent an effective strategy for enhancing the global influenza vaccine supply.     

Chemistry,manufacturing and control (CMC) and clinical trial technical support for influenza vaccine manufacturers

With the support of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services, PATH has contributed to the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Global Action Plan for Influenza Vaccines (GAP) by providing technical and clinical assistance to several developing country vaccine manufacturers (DCVMs). GAP builds regionally based independent and sustainable influenza vaccine production capacity to mitigate the overall global shortage of influenza vaccines. The program also ensures adequate influenza vaccine manufacturing capacity in the event of an influenza pandemic.Since 2009, PATH has worked closely with two DCVMs in Vietnam: the Institute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals (IVAC) and VABIOTECH. Beginning in 2013, PATH also began working with Torlak Institute in Serbia; Instituto Butantan in Brazil; Serum Institute of India Private Ltd. in India; and Changchun BCHT Biotechnology Co. (BCHT) in China.The DCVMs supported under the GAP program all had existing influenza vaccine manufacturing capability and required technical support from PATH to improve vaccine yield, process efficiency, and product formulation. PATH has provided customized technical support for the manufacturing process to each DCVM based on their respective requirements.Additionally, PATH, working with BARDA and WHO, supported several DCVMs in the clinical development of influenza vaccine candidates progressing toward national licensure or WHO prequalification. As a result of the activities outlined in this review, several companies were able to make excellent progress in developing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and completing early phase clinical trials. Licensure trials are currently ongoing or planned for several DCVMs.     

A phase I clinical trial of a PER.C6 cell grown influenza H7 virus vaccine

Avian influenza H7 viruses have transmitted from poultry to man causing human illness and fatality, highlighting the need for pandemic preparedness against this subtype. We have developed and tested the first cell-based human vaccine against H7 avian influenza virus in a phase I clinical trial. Sixty healthy volunteers were intramuscularly vaccinated with two doses of split H7N1 virus vaccine containing 12 μg or 24 μg haemagglutinin alone or with aluminium hydroxide adjuvant (300 μg or 600 μg, respectively). The vaccine was well tolerated in all subjects and no serious adverse events occurred. The vaccine elicited low haemagglutination inhibition and microneutralisation titres, although the addition of aluminium adjuvant augmented the antibody response. We found a higher number of antibody secreting cells and an association with IL-2 production in subjects with antibody response. In conclusion, our study shows that producing effective H7 pandemic vaccines is as challenging as has been observed for H5 vaccines.     

Scientific consultation on cell mediated immunity (CMI) in dengue and dengue vaccine development

Dengue is a re-emerging arboviral disease of great public health importance. Limited understanding of protective immune responses against dengue has hampered advancement of dengue vaccine candidates. Demonstrating an immunological correlate of protection has been limited to associating quantitative neutralizing antibody titers with clinical outcomes following infection. There have been a number of studies investigating the role of cell mediated immunity (CMI) in natural infections and these have demonstrated roles in both virus clearance and potentiating disease. Vaccine developers have extended the exploratory study of CMI in natural infection to the study of dengue vaccine recipients. Primary infections and monovalent vaccine administration generates dengue type-specific T-cell responses. Secondary infection, vaccination of flavivirus primed individuals, or administration of multivalent vaccine candidates results in broad, cross-reactive T-cell responses, similar to the broadening of antibody patterns. However, the precise function of CMI in protection or disease pathology remains ill-defined and, at present, there is no evidence to suggest that CMI can be utilized as a correlate of protection. Nonetheless, the study of CMI in natural infection and following vaccine administration should continue in an attempt to improve the understanding of dengue immunopathology, vaccine candidate immunogenicity, and potential correlates of protection.