Concerns relating to the application of frameworks to promote person‐centredness in nursing with older people

There is an increasing need to develop a multi‐dimensional discussion and critique around the concept of ‘person‐centred’ in the context of the delivery of nursing care for older people. As the context of nursing being considered here, it is primarily nurses who should be leading with this discourse, although drawing on a broad range of ideas from outside of nursing. The person‐centred movement, commonly believed to originate in the care of those with dementia in the UK, is growing, especially in the UK and Australia, with signs of it moving across parts of Western Europe and North America. Person‐centredness has a big emotional appeal to many nurses working with older people, perhaps because it ‘has the right feel’ for them and nurses believe it ‘feels right’ for older people. It has grabbed the attention of many practising nurses in the UK in a way that humanistic nursing theory and the various associated nursing models from previous decades, seemed to have missed. This paper contributes to the discussion by suggesting that there are conceptual frameworks that nurses can draw on to help them understand and enhance their practice. However, it is suggested that these frameworks are either in their infancy or incomplete and they still need to convince nurses of their utility for day to day practice. It is also pointed out that the underpinning concept of ‘personhood’ has not yet been fully clarified by nursing.     

Beyond ‘person‐centred’ care: a new vision for gerontological nursing

Currently considerable emphasis is placed on the promotion of person‐centred care, which has become a watchword for good practice. This paper takes a constructively critical look at some of the assumptions underpinning person‐centredness, and suggests that a relationship‐centred approach to care might be more appropriate. A framework describing the potential dimensions of relationship‐centred care is provided, and implications for further development are considered.     

Stigmatization and self‐determination of preregistration nurses: A path analysis

The concept of stigma and the stigmatizing behaviours of health‐care professionals can have a profound influence on people with mental illness. A key construct that has been identified as influencing our behaviours is self‐determination. As such, in the present study, we attempted to examine the connection and influence of motivational measures on the stigmatization of preregistration nurses. Data were collected once using three surveys that measured the motivational responses and stigmatizing behaviours of preregistration nurses after an approved mental health clinical placement. Using a path analysis, the results indicated that psychological needs significantly influenced preregistration nurses’ self‐determination towards work. In addition, self‐determination was a significant influence on the stigmatization behaviours of preregistration nurses. The results of the present study provide initial empirical evidence that supports the importance of professional self‐determination and the potential connection of quality care, as illustrated with the low stigmatizing behaviours of preregistration nurses who are more self‐determined towards their work/career. Because of the significant results of the present study, it is recommended that future research is needed that uses self‐determination theory as a lens to understand the application and importance within the field of nurse education.     

A longitudinal study into the perceptions of caring and nursing among student nurses

A longitudinal study of a cohort of student nurses was undertaken in order to investigate whether changes in perceptions of nursing and caring take place and how perceptions of nursing and caring are related. The Caring Dimensions Inventory (CDI) and the Nursing Dimensions Inventory (NDI) were employed for data collection at entry to nurse education and after 12 months. There were significant changes in the scores of a range of items in both inventories which suggested that student nurses lose some of their idealism about nursing and caring after 12 months in nurse education. While the overall ranking of items in the inventories was very similar, it was possible to distinguish between the inventories at entry to training and to observe a change, particularly in the CDI, over time by means of Mokken scaling. Nursing and caring would appear to become more synonymous to the student nurses after 12 months in nurse education. Factors scores, for factors identified in the CDI in a previous study, were used to investigate whether these scores changed at 12 months into nurse education compared with entry. No significant changes were detected.     

Using the caring dimensions inventory as an indicator of person‐centred nursing

Aims. This paper reports findings from a large‐scale quasi‐experimental study that used a measure of caring as a means of evaluating person‐centred nursing and aims to illustrate the synergy between the concepts of caring and person‐centredness. Background. Evidence would suggest that effective person‐centred nursing requires the formation of therapeutic relationships between professionals, patients and others significant to them in their lives and that these relationships are built on mutual trust, understanding and a sharing of collective knowledge. This correlates with the conceptualisation of caring that is underpinned by humanistic nursing theories. Design. A pretest post‐test design was used in this study to evaluate the effect of person‐centred nursing on a range of outcomes, one of which was nurses’ and patients’ perception of caring. Methods. The Person‐Centred Nursing Index was the main data collection tool. The Caring Dimension Inventory and Nursing Dimensions Inventory, were component parts of the Person‐Centred Nursing Index and were used to measure nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of caring. The Person‐Centred Nursing Index was administered at five points in time over a two‐year intervention period. Results. Nurses had a clear idea of what constituted caring in nursing, identifying statements that were reflective of person‐centredness, which was consistent over time. This was in contrast to patients, whose perceptions were more variable, highlighting incongruencies that have important implications for developing person‐centred practice. Conclusion. The findings confirm the Caring Dimension Inventory/Nursing Dimensions Inventory as an instrument that can be used as an indicator of person‐centred practice. Furthermore, the findings highlight the potential of such instruments to generate data on aspects of nursing practice that are traditionally hard to measure. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings would suggest that nurses need to be aware of patients’ perceptions of caring and use this to influence changes in practice, where the prime goal is to promote person‐centredness.     

Observations of nursing staff compliance to a checklist for person‐centred handovers – a quality improvement project

Nursing shift‐to‐shift handovers are important as they impact the care quality indicators such as safety, patient satisfaction and continuity. However, nurses’ handovers have also been criticised and described as unstructured and ineffective. To improve the handovers and involve patients and their loved ones in the process, a person‐centred handover (PCH) model performed at bedside has been developed and tested at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. This study reports on the nursing staffs’ compliance to a checklist used for the newly introduced PCH model. A total of 43 PCH sessions were observed at two acute care wards, using a structured observation protocol. None of the observed handover sessions included all the 13 PCH checklist subcomponents. The checklist was used in 18 (44%) of the observed handover sessions. A statistically significant higher number of subcomponents were observed when the nurses used the PCH checklist (6.4 vs. 4.5 subcomponents, p < 0.05). The mean time spent on each PCH was 6 minutes. In 56% of the sessions, the patients were observed to actively participate in the handover. Overall, the nursing staffs’ compliance to the PCH checklist needs to be improved. The observations suggest that training on communication‐oriented tasks would be beneficial to establish a person‐centred handover process.     

Rationality,practice variation and person‐centred health policy: a threshold hypothesis

Variation in practice of medicine is one of the major health policy issues of today. Ultimately, it is related to physicians' decision making. Similar patients with similar likelihood of having disease are often managed by different doctors differently: some doctors may elect to observe the patient, others decide to act based on diagnostic testing and yet others may elect to treat without testing. We explain these differences in practice by differences in disease probability thresholds at which physicians decide to act: contextual social and clinical factors and emotions such as regret affect the threshold by influencing the way doctors integrate objective data related to treatment and testing. However, depending on a theoretical construct each of the physician's behaviour can be considered rational. In fact, we showed that the current regulatory policies lead to predictably low thresholds for most decisions in contemporary practice. As a result, we may expect continuing motivation for overuse of treatment and diagnostic tests. We argue that rationality should take into account both formal principles of rationality and human intuitions about good decisions along the lines of Rawls' ‘reflective equilibrium/considered judgment’. In turn, this can help define a threshold model that is empirically testable.