Clinical tests of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache

Persistent intermittent headache is a common disorder and is often accompanied by neck aching or stiffness, which could infer a cervical contribution to headache. However, the incidence of cervicogenic headache is estimated to be 14-18% of all chronic headaches, highlighting the need for clear criterion of cervical musculoskeletal impairment to identify cervicogenic headache sufferers who may benefit from treatments such as manual therapy. This study examined the presence of cervical musculoskeletal impairment in 77 subjects, 27 with cervicogenic headache, 25 with migraine with aura and 25 control subjects. Assessments included a photographic measure of posture, range of movement, cervical manual examination, pressure pain thresholds, muscle length, performance in the cranio-cervical flexion test and cervical kinaesthetic sense. The results indicated that when compared to the migraine with aura and control groups who scored similarly in the tests, the cervicogenic headache group had less range of cervical flexion/extension (P=0.048) and significantly higher incidences of painful upper cervical joint dysfunction assessed by manual examination (all P<0.05) and muscle tightness (P<0.05). Sternocleidomastoid normalized EMG values were higher in the latter three stages of the cranio-cervical flexion test although they failed to reach significance. There were no between group differences for other measures. A discriminant analysis revealed that manual examination could discriminate the cervicogenic headache group from the other subjects (migraine with aura and control subjects combined) with an 80% sensitivity.     

Cervical musculoskeletal impairment in frequent intermittent headache. Part 1: Subjects with single headaches

Musculoskeletal disorders are considered the underlying cause of cervicogenic headache, but neck pain is commonly associated with migraine and tension-type headaches. This study tested musculoskeletal function in these headache types. From a group of 196 community-based volunteers with headache, 73 had a single headache classifiable as migraine (n = 22), tension-type (n = 33) or cervicogenic headache (n = 18); 57 subjects acted as controls. Range of movement, manual examination of cervical segments, cervical flexor and extensor strength, the cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT), cross-sectional area of selected extensor muscles at C2 (ultrasound imaging) and cervical kinaesthetic sense were measured by a blinded examiner. In all but one measure (kinaesthetic sense), the cervicogenic headache group were significantly different from the migraine, tension-type headache and control groups (all P < 0.001). A discriminant function analysis revealed that collectively, restricted movement, in association with palpable upper cervical joint dysfunction and impairment in the CCFT, had 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity to identify cervicogenic headache. There was no evidence that the cervical musculoskeletal impairments assessed in this study were present in the migraine and tension-type headache groups. Further research is required to validate the predictive capacity of this pattern of impairment to differentially diagnose cervicogenic headache.     

Cervical musculoskeletal impairment is common in elders with headache

There is an opinion that with increasing cervical degenerative joint disease with ageing, cervicogenic headaches become more frequent. This study aimed to determine if cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction was specific to headache classifiable as cervicogenic or was more generic to headache in elders. Subjects (n = 118), aged 60–75 years with recurrent headache and 44 controls were recruited. Neck function measures included range of motion (ROM), cervical joint dysfunction, cranio-cervical flexor muscle function, joint position sense (JPS) and cervical muscle strength. A questionnaire documented the characteristics of headaches for classification. A cluster analysis based on three musculoskeletal variables aligned previously with cervicogenic headache, divided headache subjects into two groups; cluster 1 (n = 57), cluster 2 (n = 50). Dysfunctions were greater in cluster 1 than in 2 for extension range and C1–2 joint dysfunction (p < 0.05). Most cervicogenic headaches were grouped in cluster 1, but musculoskeletal dysfunction was also found in headaches classifiable as migraine or tension-type headache. Neck dysfunction is not uniquely confined to cervicogenic headache in elders. Further research such as headache responsiveness to management of the neck disorder is required to better understand about the neck's causative or contributing role to elders' headache.     

Characterization of cervicogenic headache

Abstract

Headache is a symptom commonly treated by physical therapies. Towards evidence based practices, these therapies are being evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Tension headache has received most attention. Logically, physical treatments of the cervical musculoskeletal system are appropriate for the management of headaches arising from neck dysfunction; that is, cervicogenic headache. There are difficulties in always selecting suitable headache patients for study and for treatment in everyday clinical practice. This review examines the characteristics of cervicogenic headache for differential diagnosis. There is considerable symptomatic overlap between cervicogenic headache and other chronic headache forms such as tension headache and migraine without aura. The symptomatic criteria for cervicogenic headache are well researched, but current physical diagnostic criteria are often non-specific and non-discriminatory. The possibilities for new physical diagnostic criteria are explored with the aim of helping the clinician and researcher to better identify the cervicogenic headache patient. These are based on current research into physical impairments in the musculoskeletal system with neck pain.     

Physical impairments in cervicogenic headache: traumatic vs. nontraumatic onset

In order to quantify the physical impairments associated with different types of headache, 77 subjects belonging to four different groups (postmotor vehicle accident cervicogenic headache subjects, cervicogenic headache subjects nontraumatic, migraine patients and control subjects) were evaluated using the following variables: posture, cervical range of motion, strength of the neck flexors and extensors, endurance of the short neck flexors, manual segmental mobility, proprioception of the neck, and pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire and the skin roll test). The results of this study showed that postmotor vehicle accident cervicogenic patients have significantly limited active cervical range of motion (in flexion/extension and rotations), present decreased strength and endurance of neck flexors and decreased strength of the extensor muscles. Our results suggest that there are enough differences between the postmotor vehicle accident and nontraumatic cervicogenic headache subjects to warrant caution when analysing the data of these two subgroups together, as several studies have done in the past. The onset of headache is therefore an important variable that should be controlled for when attempting to characterize the physical impairments associated with cervicogenic headache.     

Cervical musculoskeletal impairments in cervicogenic headache: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of cervicogenic headache (CEH) requires the presence of a pattern of symptoms and cervical musculoskeletal signs that distinguishes it from other types of headaches. The investigation of cervical musculoskeletal impairments (CMI) can help in the diagnosis and treatment of the CEH. In order to assess the evidence concerning CMI in CEH subjects, a systematic review and a meta-analysis was performed. Several electronic databases were searched. A checklist was used to identify suitable articles and a methodological scale was used to analyse their quality. Ten articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on our meta-analysis, patients with CEH have altered range of motion in rotation, flexion-extension, cervical rotation with cervical flexion, altered cervical flexor strength, and altered cervical flexor endurance. More controlled studies investigating the cervical impairments in CEH, with a clear history of patients, and greater sample sizes, are necessary.     

Cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction in post-concussional headache

Persistent headache is a common symptom following a minor head injury or concussion, possibly related to simultaneous injury of structures of the cervical spine. This study measured aspects of cervical musculoskeletal function in a group of patients (12) with post-concussional headache (PCH) and in a normal control group. The PCH group was distinguished from the control group by the presence of painful upper cervical segmental joint dysfunction, less endurance in the neck flexor muscles and a higher incidence of moderately tight neck musculature. Active range of cervical motion and postural attitude were not significantly different between groups. As upper cervical joint dysfunction is a feature of cervicogenic causes of headache, the results of this study support the inclusion of a precise physical examination of the cervical region in differential diagnosis of patients suffering persistent headache following concussion.     

Lower cervical disc prolapse may cause cervicogenic headache: prospective study in patients undergoing surgery

In 1983 Sjaastad published for the first time diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache. Until now there have been no prospective studies investigating whether cervical disc prolapse can cause cervicogenic headache. Between July 2002 and July 2003 50 patients with cervical disc prolapse proven by computed tomography, myelography or magnetic resonance imaging were recruited and prospectively followed for 3 months. Patients were asked at different time points about headache and neck pain by questionnaires and structured interviews. These data were collected prior to and 7 and 90 days after surgery for the disc prolapse. Fifty patients with lumbar disc prolapse, matched for age and sex, undergoing surgery were recruited as controls. Headache and neck pain was diagnosed according to International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. Twelve of 50 patients with cervical disc prolapse reported new headache and neck pain. Seven patients (58%) fulfilled the 2004 IHS criteria for cervicogenic headache. Two of 50 patients with lumbar disc prolapse had new headaches. Their headaches did not fulfil the criteria for cervicogenic headache. One week after surgery, 8/12 patients with cervical disc prolapse and headache reported to be pain free. One patient was improved and three were unchanged. Three months after cervical prolapse surgery, seven patients were pain free, three improved and two unchanged. This prospective study shows an association of low cervical prolapse with cervicogenic headache: headache and neck pain improves or disappears in 80% of patients after surgery for the cervical disc prolapse. These results indicate that pain afferents from the lower cervical roots can converge on the cervical trigeminal nucleus and the nucleus caudalis.     

Quality of life of patients with cervicogenic headache: a comparison with control subjects and patients with migraine or tension-type headache

OBJECTIVE: To establish the health-related quality of life of patients with cervicogenic headache and to compare it with a random Dutch sample of control subjects and with patients with migraine without aura or with episodic tension-type headache. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with cervicogenic headache, 42 patients with episodic tension-type headache, and 39 patients with migraine without aura completed a Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form questionnaire. RESULTS: Domain scores for "physical functioning" of patients with cervicogenic headache were worse than those of patients with migraine or tension-type headache. Physical functioning scores were lower for patients with tension-type headache than for those with migraine. Migraineurs reported a diminished score for "social functioning" compared to patients with tension-type headache. All Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form domain scores were significantly lower for patients with cervicogenic headache relative to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervicogenic headache have a quality of life burden that is substantial. Although impairment in the quality of life of patients with cervicogenic headache is comparable to patients with migraine without aura and those with episodic tension-type headache, there are some specific differences.     

The diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test in C1/2-related cervicogenic headache

This single-blind comparative group design aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the cervical flexion-rotation test in the diagnosis of C1/2-related cervicogenic headache. This study tested 23 cervicogenic headache, 23 asymptomatic controls and 12 migraine with aura subjects, all aged 18-66 years. In stage 1, an experienced manipulative physiotherapist who did not partake in the flexion-rotation test procedure identified C1/2 dysfunction using passive segmental mobility tests in the cervicogenic headache group. Those with C1/2 dysfunction participated in stage 2. In stage 2, using the flexion-rotation test, subjects were tested by two experienced manipulative physiotherapists blinded to the subjects' group allocation. Each therapist stated whether the test was positive or not based on the therapist's interpretation of range of motion. The sensitivity and specificity of the flexion-rotation test was 91% and 90%, respectively (P<.001), with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91% (P<.001). The cervical flexion-rotation test significantly assists in the differential diagnosis of cervicogenic headache and in the identification of movement impairment at the C1/2 segment in patients with cervicogenic headache.     

Further clinical clarification of the muscle dysfunction in cervical headache

The Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society listed impairments in cervical muscle function as criteria for headaches of cervical spine origin. Fifteen subjects with cervical headache and 15 controls were tested for the frequency of abnormal responses to passive stretching and abnormal muscle contraction. A new test of cranio-cervical flexion was used to assess the contraction of the deep neck flexors. Results indicated a trend towards a higher frequency of abnormal response to passive stretching of the muscles examined in the cervical headache group but only the upper trapezius proved significantly different to the control group. Deep neck flexor muscle contraction was significantly inferior in the cervical headache group. From the perspective of physical characterization of cervical headache, it appears that response from passive stretch of muscle may not be a strong criterion for cervical headache but deep neck flexor performance may have potential to identify musculoskeletal involvement in headache. The finding may also provide positive directions for conservative treatment of cervical headache.     

Interobserver reliability in physical examination of the cervical spine in patients with headache

OBJECTIVE: To assess interobserver reliability of two expert headache neurologists when examining the cervical spine of patients with headache. BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cervicogenic headache involves the physical examination of the cervical spine. METHODS: Twenty-four patients diagnosed as having migraine, tension-type headache, or cervicogenic headache were included in the study. After interview, each patient's cervical spine was examined in a structured way. Reliability was assessed by Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Reduced range of motion in the cervical spine showed kappa scores indicating moderate agreement. Provocation of headache revealed moderate-to-substantial agreement. Assessment of zygapophyseal joint pressure pain showed slight-to-fair agreement. The kappa values of the circumscribed characteristic tender points showed agreement ranging from "not better than chance" to "substantial agreement." CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the interobserver reliability of expert headache neurologists was satisfactory in the majority of the physical examination tests of the cervical spine in patients with different headache syndromes. However, standardization of the clinical tests in order to improve their reliability is recommended.     

The flexion-rotation test and active cervical mobility--a comparative measurement study in cervicogenic headache

A single blind, age and gender matched, comparative measurement study was designed to assess active range of cervical motion and passive range of rotation in cervical flexion in asymptomatic and cervicogenic headache subjects. Both procedures are commonly used in clinical practice to evaluate patients with cervicogenic headache. We studied 20 women and eight men with side dominant cervicogenic headache (mean age 43.3 years) matched with 28 asymptomatic subjects. Two experienced manipulative therapists, who were blind to each other's measurement, noted active ranges of cervical motion and passive cervical rotation performed in the flexion-rotation test using the Cervical Range of Motion Device. Headache severity was assessed by a questionnaire. Additionally, one therapist prior to neck motion assessment determined the dominant symptomatic cervical motion segment. Active cervical motion in each direction was identical between the cervicogenic and control groups. In contrast, average rotation in flexion was 44 degrees to each side in the asymptomatic group and 28 degrees towards the headache side in the symptomatic group. C1-2 was deemed to be the dominant segmental level of headache origin in 24 of 28 subjects. In those 24 subjects range of rotation during the flexion-rotation test was inversely correlated to headache severity.     

Cervicogenic Headache - The Clinical Picture, Radiological Findings and Hypotheses on Its Pathophysiology

SYNOPSIS
The clinical picture of 15 patients with "cervicogenic headache" is presented. The patients suffered from constant one-sided headaches, upon which were superimposed acute attacks. The pain could be precipitated and intensified mechanically. It was accompanied in one third of the patients by ipsilateral lacrimation, conjunctival injection, lid edema and visual blurring. Other concomitant symptoms were phono- and photophobia, nausea and vomiting. A C2 blockade always led to temporary pain relief.Routine X-rays of the cervical spine and functional radio-graphs in flexion and extension did not reveal any findings specific for cervicogenic headache when compared to 18 control subjects. Hypotheses on the pathophysiology of cervicogenic headache are presented.     

International Headache Society headache diagnostic patterns in pain facility patients

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have indicated that many patients with chronic pain (PWCP) referred to pain facilities for the treatment of neck and/or low back pain complain of associated headaches. The purpose of this study was to characterize the nature of these headaches according to International Headache Society (IHS) headache diagnostic criteria. DESIGN: In preparation for this study, a questionnaire that reflected IHS headache diagnostic criteria was developed. All consecutive patients admitted to our pain facility complaining of headache completed this questionnaire and received a physical and neurologic examination focused on key aspects of headache. A headache interview was also conducted, using the questionnaire as a question guide. All questionnaires were entered in a computerized database, and IHS diagnoses were arrived at for each patient. As many IHS diagnoses as possible were assigned to each PWCP as long as IHS criteria were fulfilled. In addition, a frequency distribution for headache precipitants and neck-associated symptoms was developed and evaluated by discriminant analysis to determine the diagnostic value of these factors in relation to each IHS diagnostic group. SETTING: Pain facility (multidisciplinary pain center). PATIENTS: Consecutive PWCP. RESULTS: Of 1,466 PWCP, 154 (10.5%) were identified as suffering from severe headache interfering with function. Of these, 55.8% indicated that their headaches were related to an injury for which they were seeking treatment and 83.7% had neck pain. Migraine headache represented the most common diagnostic group (90.3%), with cervicogenic headache representing the second most common (33.8%). Of the total group, 44.2% had more than one headache diagnosis, that is, there was overlap. Cervicogenic headache patients had the greatest percentage of overlap (94.2%), with migraine patients being second (68.3%). The most frequent headache precipitant was mental stress, followed by neck position and activity/exercise. The migraine and cervicogenic headache groups had a statistically significant greater number of neck-associated symptoms when compared with the remaining patients. Of the total headache group, 74.6% complained that they had a tender point at the back of their neck. Cervicogenic, migraine, and tension PWCP had the greatest frequency of head or neck tender points. The discriminant analysis for neck-associated symptoms yielded the following symptoms as the most common predictors of headache across IHS diagnostic groups: clues to onset were severe headache beginning at the neck or tender point and numbness in arms and legs; headache brought on by neck position and arms overhead; and neck symptoms consisting of a tender point in the neck and feeling severe headache in the neck. CONCLUSIONS: Headache can and should be considered a frequent comorbid condition in PWCP. Because of the overlap data, more precise diagnostic criteria may be required to separate cervicogenic headache from migraine headache. Neck-associated symptoms seem to be important even to those PWCP diagnosed with migraine headache.     

Musculoskeletal abnormalities in chronic headache: a controlled comparison of headache diagnostic groups

The presence of postural, myofascial, and mechanical abnormalities in patients with migraine, tension-type headache, or both headache diagnoses was compared to a headache-free control sample. Twenty-four control subjects were obtained from a convenience sampling and each was matched by age and sex to three patients with headache (one with migraine [with or without aura], one with tension-type headache, and one with diagnoses of both migraine and tension-type headache [combined diagnosis]) who had been previously assessed by a physical therapist at a headache clinic. Physical therapy assessment findings were compared among the four groups.
There was a significant difference in the presence of postural abnormalities between the controls and the patients, with posture abnormalities more likely to be present in those with headache. The patients were also significantly more likely to have active trigger points and trigger points in the neck than were the control subjects. There were no significant group differences identified in the mechanical measures, nor were there any significant differences among the three headache categories. Determination of the clinical significance of these musculoskeletal abnormalities in patients with headache will require the development and testing of further standardized assessments as well as physical therapy treatment programs.     

"Hemicrania continua": another headache absolutely responsive to indomethacin

Two cases suffering from a headache apparently at variance with well recognized headaches are described. It is characterized by a steady, non-paroxysmal, probably severe to moderately severe hemicrania localized anteriorly or anteroposteriorly and is not associated with nausea. Indomethacin exerts an absolute, persistent and clearly dose-dependent effect on this headache, which differs from unilateral headache syndromes such as cluster headache and cervicogenic headache in its temporal pattern and indomethacin response. It differs from chronic paroxysmal hemicrania in its temporal pattern and in the lack of accompanying symptoms.     

Use of cervical spine manipulation under anesthesia for management of cervical disk herniation, cervical radiculopathy, and associated cervicogenic headache syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the benefits of cervical spine manipulation with the patient under anesthesia as an approach to treating a patient with chronic cervical disk herniation, associated cervical radiculopathy, and cervicogenic headache syndrome. CLINICAL FEATURES: The patient had neck pain with radiating paresthesia into the right upper extremity and incapacitating headaches and had no response to 6 months of conservative therapy. Treatment included spinal manipulative therapy, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medication, and acupuncture. Magnetic resonance imaging, electromyography, and somatosensory evoked potential examination all revealed positive diagnostic findings. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Treatment included 3 successive days of cervical spine manipulation with the patient under anesthesia. The patient had immediate relief after the first procedure. Her neck and arm pain were reported to be 50% better after the first trial, and her headaches were better by 80% after the third trial. Four months after the last procedure the patient reported a 95% improvement in her overall condition. CONCLUSION: Cervical spine manipulation with the patient under anesthesia has a place in the chiropractic arena. It is a useful tool for treating chronic discopathic disease complicated by cervical radiculopathy and cervicogenic headache syndrome. The beneficial results of this procedure are contingent on careful patient selection and proper training of qualified chiropractic physicians.     

Headache and the cervical spine: a critical review

Headache related to the cervical spine is often misdiagnosed and treated inadequately because of confusing and varying terminology. Primary headaches such as tension-type headache and migraine are incorrectly categorized as "cervicogenic" merely because of their occipital localization. Cervicogenic headache as described by Sjaastad presents as a unilateral headache of fluctuating intensity increased by movement of the head and typically radiates from occipital to frontal regions. Definition, pathophysiology, differential diagnoses and therapy of cervicogenic headache are demonstrated. Ipsilateral blockades of the C2 root and/or greater occipital nerve allow a differentiation between cervicogenic headache and primary headache syndromes such as migraine or tension-type headache. Neither pharmacological nor surgical or chiropractic procedures lead to a significant improvement or remission of cervicogenic headache. Pains of various anatomical regions possibly join into a common anatomical pathway, then present as cervicogenic headache, which should therefore be understood as a homogeneous but also unspecific pattern of reaction.