Microwave: practical cost-effective method for sterilizing urinary catheters in the home

We used a standard microwave oven to sterilize red rubber catheters used for intermittent self-catheterization. Catheters were incubated for sixty minutes in a suspension of microorganisms isolated from the urine of patients with urinary tract infections. For each trial, 6 catheters were removed from their respective suspensions, placed in separate plastic freezer bags, distributed evenly in a microwave oven (avoiding cold spots), and microwaved simultaneously for twelve minutes. A control catheter was not microwaved. Two strains of each microorganism were tested. The urinary isolates were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Enterobacter sp., Pseudomonas sp., Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp., and Candida sp. In each experiment, all 6 catheters were sterilized. Repeat sterilization in the microwave oven did not affect the integrity of the catheters or the plastic bags. A water heat sink of constant volume was employed. A home microwave oven may be used as a method to sterilize red rubber catheters for reuse with a recommended time of twelve minutes at full power. This technique makes aseptic intermittent self-catheterization a practical possibility.     

MICROWAVE STERILIZATION OF POLYETHYLENE CATHETERS FOR INTERMITTENT SELF-CATHETERIZATION

A standard household 650 W microwave oven was used to sterilize polyethylene catheters of the type used for intermittent self-catheterization. The Catheters were infected with Proteus sp. bacteria and microwaved at 650 W for periods of 2, 4, 6 and 8 minutes. The effect of microwaving was assessed by determining the resultant colony counts following catheter culture. It was determined that 6 minutes of microwaving were required to achieve sterility. It is suggested that use of a microwave oven is a reliable and cost-effective method of sterilizing polyethylene catheters for intermittent self-catheterization.     

Urinary catheter sterilization with microwave oven

Studies were conducted utilizing a home microwave oven to sterilize catheters commonly used for intermittent self-catherization. Red rubber urinary catheters were inoculated with common clinical uropathogens and were placed in sealed brown paper bags or Ziploc plastic freezer bags and microwaved at full power for various timed intervals. Differences were noted in killing time for some strains or species of bacteria. Twelve minutes at full power appeared to be sufficient time for complete sterilization of most catheters placed in plastic bags. Cold spots were noted in the oven; suggestions are made for placing the bags in certain areas to achieve complete sterilization of contaminated catheters. Repeat sterilization did not affect the integrity of catheters or the plastic bags. A water heat sink of constant volume was employed during the sterilization process. Six catheters could be sterilized at one time. This convenience allows patients reuse of catheters and provides less chances of self-inoculation due to reuse of contaminated catheters for intermittent self-catherization.     

Variability in catheter microwave sterilization techniques in a single clinic population

PURPOSE: We designed a survey to assess the microwave sterilization technique practiced by patients at our clinic who perform clean intermittent catheterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 23-question survey addressing urinary catheter use and home sterilization techniques was mailed to 129 patients. A followup survey was mailed to 47 respondents who reported using a microwave oven to sterilize the catheters to assess the microwave technique further. RESULTS: Of the 129 initial surveys 84 (64%) were returned, while 40 (85%) of the 47 followup questionnaires on microwave sterilization were returned. All patients surveyed have used clean intermittent catheterization for at least 1 year and 75% have used it more than 5 years. Of the respondents 80% perform clean intermittent catheterization 4 to 5 times daily, although sterilization frequency varies from daily to less than once weekly. Of the respondents 71% reported no difficulty with microwave sterilization, although 31 (63%) reported a history of catheter melting during microwaving. Of the respondents 35% reported using a rotation table, all used a heat sink containing 1/2 to 4 cups of water, 39% used 500 to 1,000 W., 37% used greater than 1,000 W., 73% set the microwave for 6 minutes, others set it for 3 to 30 minutes and 98% used a power setting described as high, full, 10 or 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists in the cleaning and sterilizing techniques used by our patients, although they were given uniform written and verbal instructions. It is unclear from the data in the literature how this variation affects sterilization.     

The physical and antimicrobial effects of microwave heating and alcohol immersion on catheters that are reused for clean intermittent catheterisation

INTRODUCTION: Due to worldwide different health insurance policies, patients are often forced to reuse the catheters when performing Clean Intermittent Catheterisation (CIC). We have compared the physical qualities and the antimicrobial effects of two methods of reusing catheters: microwave heating and storage of the catheters in a 70% alcohol solution. The studies were performed during different lengths of time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of catheters (a standard polyvinylchloride catheter, a special polyvinylchloride catheter with flexible Ergothan tip and a prelubrified catheter), normally intended for single use, were submitted to the effect of a microwave oven (Multitech 215 High Grade and Whirlpool M220 750 W and 1000 W with rotating plate) or preservation in a 70% alcohol solution. To study the effects of microwave heating, a recipient of water was placed in the oven to spread the microwaves and to absorb the heat. The catheters were placed in a resealable plastic bag (Ziploc. To study the effects of preservation in a 70% alcohol solution, the catheters were immerged in the solution for different lengths of time. Thereafter were the physical qualities of the catheters evaluated by using the technique of Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The antimicrobial effect of the method was evaluated after grafting the catheters with pathogenic E. coli, P. aeruginosa or S. aureus strains. RESULTS: Microwave heating up to 12 minutes at 750 W caused only minimal changes in the physical qualities of all the catheters. However, there was only an antimicrobial effect of the microwave heating on E. coli and not on P. aeruginosa or S. aureus. If the catheter remained longer than 45 minutes in a 70% alcohol solution, the physical qualities of the catheter changed either minimal in the special polyvinylchloride catheter with flexible Ergothan top but changed significantly in the prelubrified catheter). However, already after 5 minutes of immersion in the 70% alcohol solution there was a complete antimicrobial effect on E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in all catheters. CONCLUSIONS: It should be recommended to patients on CIC to use a sterile packed and not previously used catheter. In this study we have shown that immersing the catheters in a 70% alcohol solution during 5 minutes can effectively disinfect the catheter without jeopardising the physical qualities. Thereafter, the catheters could be placed in a resealable (e.g. Ziploc bag without being rinsed under water, in order that the few drops of alcohol cause alcohol vapours within the closed plastic bag and maintain the antimicrobial effect.     

A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization

PURPOSE: We compared the incidence of hematuria, pyuria and clinical urinary tract infection in patients who performed intermittent self-catheterization using a hydrophilic coated LoFric (Astra Tech AB, M?lndal, Sweden) or standard plastic catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 62 male patients who performed intermittent self-catheterization to manage neurogenic bladder were randomized into 2 treatment groups at 3 American study sites. Outcome measures included urinary tract infection, microhematuria, pyuria and satisfaction rates. RESULTS: Of the 62 enrolled patients 49 completed the 12-month study. The withdrawal rate was not different in the 2 groups. At the end of the study there was statistically significantly less hematuria in the hydrophilic coated catheter group compared with controls. In addition, there was a significant decrease in the urinary tract infection rate from baseline in the hydrophilic coated catheter group but not in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the hydrophilic coated catheter by patients on intermittent self-catheterization is associated with less hematuria and a significant decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infections. Therefore, it may be preferable for some patients, especially those with a history of difficult catheterization, urethral trauma or a high rate of urinary tract infection.     

A novel intraurethral prostatic bridge catheter for prevention of temporary prostatic obstruction following high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE: We evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel intraurethral prostatic bridge catheter in preventing temporary prostatic obstruction following targeted high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent high energy transurethral microwave therapy under topical urethral anesthesia followed by placement of a prostatic bridge catheter, which remained indwelling as long as 1 month (prostatic bridge catheter group). Patient evaluation included determination of peak urinary flow rate, International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and quality of life score at baseline, immediately following transurethral microwave therapy and prostatic bridge catheter placement, and periodically thereafter for 1 month. Results were retrospectively compared with those of 51 patients who underwent transurethral microwave therapy followed by standard temporary urinary catheterization, typically for 24 hours (standard catheterization group). RESULTS. Immediately following transurethral microwave therapy and prostatic bridge catheter placement significant improvements (p <0.0005) were observed in mean peak flow rate, I-PSS and quality of life score of 59.3, 33.5 and 23.6%, respectively, compared with baseline values. Further improvements were noted up to 1 month, at which time mean peak flow rate, I-PSS and quality of life score had improved 79.0, 54.9 and 56.5%, respectively, versus baseline (p <0.0005). In a retrospective comparison at baseline and 14 days between the prostatic bridge catheter group and standard catheterization group mean baseline peak flow rate, I-PSS and quality of life score were similar. However, at the 14-day followup evaluation in the prostatic bridge catheter group mean peak flow rate was 101.8% higher, and I-PSS and quality of life score were 47.9 and 51.1% lower, respectively, than the corresponding values in the standard catheterization group (p <0.0005). The prostatic bridge catheter was well tolerated and remained indwelling throughout the entire 1-month followup in 48 of 54 patients (88.9%). Early prostatic bridge catheter removal was required in 3 patients (5.6%) due to urinary retention and in 3 (5.6%) due to catheter migration. CONCLUSIONS. Prostatic bridge catheter placement provides an effective and well tolerated option for preventing prostatic obstruction in the acute period after transurethral microwave therapy. This approach avoids the inconvenience and infection risk of standard indwelling catheters or intermittent self-catheterization. Prostatic bridge catheter insertion and removal are rapid, facile, nontraumatic procedures. Prostatic bridge catheter may potentially be used in an array of minimally invasive procedures involving thermal treatment of the prostate gland.     

Evaluation of the use of Urocath-Gel catheters for intermittent self-catheterization by male patients using conventional catheters for a long time

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of intermittent self-catheterization (CIC) with change from conventional catheter to low-friction Urocath-Gel catheter. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if such catheters are well accepted and to evaluate their practical use. METHODS: Thirty-nine male patients, between 19 and 74 years old, performing clean intermittent self-catheterization with conventional catheters for a neuropathic bladder for many years were included in this study after written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were clinical urinary tract infection, acute infection of urethra, prostate or epididymis, untreated urethral strictures and false passages or severe urethral bleeding occurring within the last month. During 1 month they changed to the use of the Urocath-Gel catheter. Complications were noted. Satisfaction was evaluated by a visual analogue scale and by questioning. RESULTS: Four patients did not complete the study, two for side effects, two for difficulties with the catheterization technique. Time needed for CIC was not different with both techniques. Difficult introduction or difficult retreat of the catheter were not different in frequency. Impossibility to introduce the catheter was less frequent. Urethritis and urethral bleeding were less frequent than during the use of conventional catheters. Satisfaction was better with the low friction catheters. Negative satisfaction was mainly related to the availability and the use of water to lubricate the catheter, difficulty of manipulation and fear for cost. CONCLUSION: The hydrophilic catheter Urocath-Gel proved as easy to use as conventional catheters but was better tolerated. Satisfaction was better especially in patients who experienced problems with conventional catheters. Some patients were unsatisfied for reasons of practical use or for economical reasons.     

Suprapubic endoscopic vesical neck suspension (Stamey procedure) for control of urinary incontinence in a woman following cauda equina injury

Suprapubic endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck is a popular and effective procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. A woman who suffered a traumatic cauda equina injury had areflexic detrusor dysfunction with normal intravesical filling pressure. The patient had moderate proximal urethral dysfunction resulting in incontinence despite an adequate intermittent self-catheterization regimen and treatment with an alpha-sympathomimetic drug. Following suprapubic endoscopic vesical neck suspension she has remained totally continent on intermittent self-catheterization.     

The 'no-touch' method of intermittent urinary catheter insertion: can it reduce the risk of bacteria entering the bladder?

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro model was designed to determine whether using a no-touch method for catheter preparation and insertion would affect the degree of contamination transmitted to intermittent urinary catheters. SETTING: Northview Laboratories, Northbrook, IL 60062, USA. METHODS: This was a parallel experimental study conducted in vitro at an independent testing laboratory under Good Manufacturing Practices. Six different models of intermittent urinary catheter were tested in triplicate, in accordance with the manufacturer's Instructions For Use (IFU). Gloved hands were contaminated with a known amount of Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli, preparation for insertion was mimicked according to the manufacturer's IFU. The number of bacteria transferred to the catheter was then quantified using a validated technique. The null hypothesis tested was that the bacterial contamination resulting from handling would be the same for all of the catheters. The primary outcome measure was the amount of bacteria, expressed as colony forming units (CFU), recovered from the catheters. The catheter wrappers were sampled to confirm that active transfer of microorganisms had taken place and nonhandled samples served as the negative controls. RESULTS: For both test organisms, the number of bacteria recovered from the catheters was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for the catheters featuring the no-touch design (approximately 5 CFU/plate versus 2.1 x 10(2) to 4.4 x 10(2) for the traditional hydrophilic catheters). The bacterial recovery from those catheters with the no-touch design often fell below the nominal detection limit. CONCLUSION: The results of this study allow the null hypothesis to be rejected; it can be concluded that the no-touch method provides a significant benefit in reducing the potential for external contamination of an intermittent urinary catheter. This result supports the recent recommendations for aseptic intermittent catheterization promoted within the guidelines issued by the European Association of Urologists (EAU).     

A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patients performing clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) for a short period preferred a prelubricated, hydrophilic, disposable polyvinyl chloride (PVC) catheter or a non-hydrophilic PVC catheter which could be used several times and that had to be lubricated by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective cross-over study, 32 patients used each type of catheter for 3 weeks. After each 3-week period, the patients completed a questionnaire to assess comfort and preference, and urine specimens were obtained for culture. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of CISC, discomfort when used, opinion on handling the catheters, preference toward one of the catheters, or of infection. CONCLUSION: Non-hydrophilic PVC catheters may be used safely and with no discomfort to the patient. In addition it may be possible for the healthcare system to save money, as the non-hydrophilic PVC catheters are much cheaper.     

Reused silicone catheter for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC): is it safe for spinal cord-injured (SCI) men?

STUDY DESIGN: Study of reusable catheter. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a silicone cathether reused over years for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) was safe for spinal cord injured (SCI) men. SETTING: Maharaj Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was obtained from SCI men who had used CIC with a reusable silicone catheter for more than a year. Demographic data, urological management and urinary tract complications focusing on the radiologic status of the urethra were reviewed and analyzed. In addition, two reused and one new catheters were studied under electron microscope for catheter morphology (surface and lumen) and stiffness. RESULTS: There were 28 SCI men included in this study. The average duration of CIC use was 4.8 years and the average time of usage for each catheter was 3 years (range 1-7 years). In all, 26 men previously used indwelling catheterization (ID) during the acute phase. In all, 23 men performed self-catheterization. Regarding urinary complications, three reported urethral bleeding, five had episodes of pus per urethra, five had epididymitis, four had passing stones, 18 had occasional foul smelly urine, 10 developed fever and cloudy urine during the past year. Of 17 patients who had ultrasonography done, four had pathologic findings in kidney and one had bladder calculi. Demographic data, urinary management and complications did not have significant relation to the abnormality of the urethrogram or urinary tract infection. However, where the frequency of CIC was higher, the abnormality of the urethra was lower (P<0.05). All had serum Cr level < or =1.3 mg/dl. Electron microscopic findings of reused catheters for 2 years revealed encrustation but no obstruction in the lumens and 20% increase in stiffness. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome, especially with regard to urethral abnormalities with this reusable silicone catheter is as good as with a disposable one. However, to reuse urinary catheters, one should consider the increasing risk of infection. For SCI patients in developing countries, CIC with a reusable silicone catheter may be a suitable and safe choice if one cleans and applies it properly to reduce infection. In order to answer the question how long a person in a developing country should use the same silicone catheter, further research should be conducted.     

Bladder management and risk of bladder stone formation in spinal cord injured patients

PURPOSE: We determined by statistical analysis whether method of management is associated with risk of bladder stone formation in spinal cord injured patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of 457 patients admitted to Stoke Mandeville Hospital Spinal Injuries Center between 1985 and 1990 with more than 6 months of followup. Analysis included Cox regression and Poisson regression. RESULTS: Relative to those patients treated with intermittent self-catheterization, the hazard ratio was 10.5 (p <0.0005, 95% confidence interval 4.0-27.5) for patients with suprapubic catheters and it was 12.8 (p <0.0005, 95% confidence interval 5.1-31.9) for those with indwelling urethral catheters. The absolute annual risk of stone formation in patients with a catheter was 4% compared with 0.2% for those on intermittent self-catheterization. However, having formed a stone, the risk of forming a subsequent stone quadrupled to 16% per year. Bladder stones were no more likely to form in patients with suprapubic catheters compared to those with indwelling urethral catheters (hazard ratio 1.2, p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: In spinal cord injured patients long-term catheterization is associated with a substantial increased risk of bladder stone formation. This increased risk occurs independently of age, sex and injury level. Degree of injury (complete or incomplete) was considered in the model. Catheter type (suprapubic or urethral) did not change this risk significantly if at all.     

微波联合氯己定用于金属器械快速灭菌的实验研究

目的寻求金属器械快速灭菌的方法 ,满足手术过程中急需器械的灭菌需求。方法将 336件金属手术器械人工染菌后放入微波炉专用塑料盒中 (7件 /盒 ) ,分别加入 0 .5 %氯己定溶液、蒸馏水各 30 0ml加盖 ,置入家用微波炉(2盒 /次 ,14件 ) ,使用高火档 (输出功率 6 5 0W ) ,3、5min分别消毒 2 4次 ,消毒后分别按常规采样做无菌检测 ,观察灭菌效果。结果家用微波炉加蒸馏水作用 3min灭菌合格率为 88.0 9% ,5min灭菌合格率为 95 .2 4 % ;加 0 .5 %氯己定溶液消毒 3min灭菌合格率为 93.4 5 % ,5min灭菌合格率达 10 0 .0 0 %。结论金属器械经家用微波炉 (输出功率为 6 5 0W )与 0 .5 %氯己定溶液协同作用 5min ,即可完全灭菌 ,解决手术过程中急用金属器械的消毒灭菌问题。     

Suprapubic endoscopic vesical neck suspension for the management of urinary incontinence in myelodysplastic girls

Urinary incontinence may be a formidable hardship in many girls with myelodysplasia. In those patients who fail treatment with intermittent self-catheterization and pharmacotherapy surgical augmentation of outlet resistance may successfully alleviate incontinence. In patients with less severe degrees of urethral sphincteric incompetence suprapubic endoscopic vesical neck suspension in conjunction with intermittent self-catheterization can be successful. Patients must be selected carefully, with particular attention directed at detecting decreased detrusor compliance. Poor detrusor compliance must be controllable or corrected before augmentation of urethral resistance to prevent postoperative upper urinary tract deterioration.     

Comparison of three lasers for dental instrument sterilization

The sterilization of dental instruments is an area of great interest and recent concern in the field of dentistry. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of three lasers (argon, CO2, and NdYAG) to sterilize dental instruments. Endodontic reamers were contaminated with microorganisms, lased at various levels of energy, placed in Trypticase soy broth, incubated, and read for growth or no growth to determine sterility. Results indicated that the argon laser is capable of sterilizing selected dental instruments at the lowest energy level (1 watt for 120 seconds) of the three lasers tested. The other two lasers were able to sterilize the instruments also, but at higher energy levels. Results indicated all three lasers capable of sterilizing selected dental instruments; however, the argon laser was able to do so consistently at the lowest energy level of 1 watt for 120 seconds.     

The role of bladder catheterization in total knee arthroplasty

The use of a urinary bladder catheter in the perioperative period for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty is controversial. In the current study, two bladder management protocols were studied. One group of patients had an indwelling catheter inserted into the bladder before total knee arthroplasty. The other group of patients was observed and treated for urinary retention as necessary. From 1993 to 1998, 652 patients undergoing primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized by surgeon into two groups: one group underwent preoperative insertion of an indwelling bladder catheter (306 patients), and one group (346 patients) had a catheter inserted postoperatively as necessary. Sixty-six percent (229 of 346) of these patients required catheterization (203 had indwelling catheters and 26 had intermittent straight catheters). A urinary tract infection developed in five patients (1.6%) in whom a catheter was inserted preoperatively. A urinary tract infection developed in six patients (1.7%) in whom a catheter was inserted if necessary. Five of these urinary tract infections developed in patients with delayed indwelling bladder catheters. A urinary tract infection did not develop in any patient in whom a straight catheter was inserted. There was no significant difference in the length of stay in the hospital between the two groups. The group in whom a catheter always was inserted generated $491 greater cost for total knee arthroplasty than patients in whom a catheter was inserted if necessary.     

Coated catheters for intermittent catheterization: smooth or sticky?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current range of hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent self-catheterization, focusing on the adherence of the catheter to the urethral mucosa at the end of catheterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, 61 community-based men tested each of four different hydrophilic-coated catheters available in the UK at the time. Subjects used each of the four test catheters for 1 week in a random order, and were provided with the number and size of catheter they normally used. To assess the products, the subjects: (i) timed seven catheterizations using a stop-watch to determine the time taken from extracting the catheter from the water-filled package, to removing the catheter from the penis, having emptied the bladder; (ii) recorded the severity of 'sticking' on catheter removal on a three-point scale (not at all, a little, a lot); and (iii) completed a product-performance questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ratings of 'sticking' between the 'Easicath' and 'Lofric' (P > 0.05), but there were significant differences between these two products and the 'Aquacath' and the 'Silky', which were found to 'stick' more (P < 0.001). The 'Silky' was reported to stick significantly more than the 'Aquacath' (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the urethral mucosa on catheter removal was a common problem, occurring with all catheters, but two products were significantly more likely to stick than the other two. The clinical importance of 'sticking' and the long-term implications are currently unknown. The relative 'sticking' of uncoated catheters has also not been established.     

Guideline for the prevention of health care‐associated infection in urological practice in Japan

For developing the Japanese guideline for the prevention of health care‐associated infection in urological practice, we surveyed the literature including standard precautions, environmental considerations in both the inpatient and outpatient settings, the management of urinary catheters, endoscopy techniques, and the disinfection and sterilization of instruments used in endoscopies and related procedures. The concept of this guideline is to show the minimum precautions that urologists and other medical professionals should observe when they work in the urological field. Standard precautions based on hand hygiene and the use of personal protective equipment should be observed in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. In the inpatient setting, the management of the toilet is important. Collecting urine should be restricted only when it is necessary to determine a patient's urinary output. The management for urinary catheter and infection are created based on the “European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter‐associated urinary tract infections”. In addition, we propose that nephrostomy should be carried out after maximum barrier precautions have been taken. Urinary catheters are replaced in the event of an occlusion or if there are signs that an occlusion might occur, but the same catheter cannot be left in place for more than 2 months. Regarding the handling of urine containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis, airborne infection countermeasures are unnecessary, except for the laboratory personnel. For the procedures using urological endoscopes, aseptic techniques are recommended. Endoscopes and related devices should be used by sterilization or high‐level disinfection, but formaldehyde gas cannot be used.     

Detubularized right-hemicolonic continent urinary reservoir with plicated terminal ileum

A continent urinary reservoir which consists of 1) detubularized caecum, ascending colon and the right half of transverse colon. 2) anastomosis of ureter and ascending colon with antireflex technique, and 3) plicated terminal ileal segment for continence and catheter insertion was created in 12 patients after radical cystectomy for urothelioma. Our method to create a continent urinary reservoir is simple and technically easy. It can, therefore, provide patients' satisfaction with low incidence of complication. However, such continent urinary reservoir diversion should be performed only for carefully selected patients, taking into consideration the physical status and the character and social status of the patient. This is because some patients who have had such surgery may change their mind to keep a balloon catheter to avoid the intermittent self-catheterization every 3 to 4 hours after surgery.