Docetaxel, vinorelbine, and zoledronic acid as first-line treatment in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer: a phase II study

ObjectivesCombining antineoplastic agents is the key to improving the treatment options for men with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The current study investigated the combination of docetaxel, vinorelbine, and zoledronic acid as a first-line treatment for HRPC.MethodsPatients were treated repeatedly with docetaxel (25 mg/mq) and vinorelbine (10 mg/mq) intravenously for three consecutive weeks followed by a 1-wk rest until disease progression or side effects. Zoledronic acid was administered every 4 wk. Changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and objective responses were evaluated after two and three cycles, respectively. Toxicity and pain evaluation, based on pain intensity reduction and analgesic drug reduction, were assessed every cycle.ResultsForty men with HRPC (median age: 65 yr) were treated. Among 38 evaluable patients, complete and major PSA responses were observed in seven (18%) and 12 (32%), respectively; a partial objective response was observed in six of 15 (40%) patients with measurable disease. Neutropenia (25%) was the most important grade 3 haematologic toxicity observed. Only three patients (7.5%) reported grade 4 neutropenia. Nineteen patients (47.5%) achieved a reduction of pain intensity and analgesic drug use after two cycles. Median progression-free survival was 7 mo (95% CI: 2–10 mo), with a median overall survival of 17 mo (95% CI: 6–22 mo).ConclusionsThe combination of docetaxel, vinorelbine, and zoledronic acid is associated with improvement in biochemical, objective, and pain responses and is well tolerated as a first-line treatment for HRPC.     

Weekly docetaxel and vinorelbine (VIN-DOX) as first line treatment in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The current study investigated the clinical benefit, the impact on biochemical and objective response and tolerability of weekly docetaxel with vinorelbine (VIN-DOX) in symptomatic patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Patients were treated with docetaxel 25 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2, intravenously for 6 consecutive weeks followed by a 2 week rest repeatedly until disease progression. Clinical benefit evaluations, based on Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and pain measure, were assessed weekly during therapy. A clinical benefit response was defined as a sustained (> or =4 weeks) improvements in one of these parameters. Changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, tumoral response and toxicity also were evaluated. RESULTS: 19 men (median age 68 years), were treated. Overall, 42% of patients achieved a KPS significant change and positive pain response; 47% achieved a 50% or greater reduction in PSA. The objective response rate was observed in 2 of 9 patients with measurable disease (22%). The most important toxicity was neutropenia (Grade 3 = 32%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of weekly VIN-DOX appears to be feasible. VIN-DOX was found to be associated with improvement in clinical benefit response and biochemical response and well tolerated as first line treatment in HRPC.     

Combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and UFT against hormone refractory prostate cancer

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy has been shown to be effective and well tolerated by Japanese patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of docetaxel in combination with UFT (a combination of tegafur and uracil) in Japanese patients with HRPC. Ten patients aged 60-86 years with HRPC, who were pre-treated with hormonal therapy and expected to have more than 3 month survival and without major organ dysfunction, were included in this study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus UFT 260 mg/m2 /day. The primary end point was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and the secondary end points included progression-free survival and toxicity. Nine patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The PSA response rate was 50% (1 CR and 4 PR). The most common non-hematological adverse events (of any grade) possibly related to treatment were neutropenia and anorexia. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and anorexia occurred in 50 and 20% of patients, respectively. The combination of docetaxel and UFT was feasible and active in Japanese patients with HRPC, with a manageable adverse-event profile similar to that observed in lung cancer chemotherapy.     

A randomized study of docetaxel and dexamethasone with low- or high-dose estramustine for patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To test the combination of docetaxel with two different doses of estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), to improve response rates and to lower side-effects, as docetaxel-based chemotherapy is an increasing option for men with advanced HRPC, and alone or combined with estramustine, docetaxel improves median survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 72 patients with metastatic HRPC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (70 mg/m(2) intravenously, on day 2 every 21 days) and estramustine (3 x 280 mg/day oral starting 1 day before docetaxel, for 5 consecutive days) for arm A, or estramustine (3 x 140 mg/day oral starting 1 day before docetaxel, for 3 consecutive days) for arm B. Premedication with oral dexamethasone at a total daily dose of 16 mg, in divided doses twice a day was administered in arm A on day 1-5 and in arm B on day 1-3. Initially, six cycles were administered. Chemotherapy was restarted after a significant increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Patients were monitored for any measurable PSA response and toxicity. RESULTS: Between the arms there was no statistically significant difference in time to progression and overall survival. However, treatment B had less treatment-related toxicity than A. Independent prognostic variables were baseline factors like PSA level, haemoglobin level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and bone pain at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized phase II study the combination of docetaxel and estramustine had substantial activity in HRPC, with a significant incidence of severe toxicity, both haematological and not. Nevertheless, treatment-related toxicity was predictable and manageable. There was no better effect with a higher dose of estramustine with docetaxel than for a lower dose. There was a slight tendency to higher toxicity for high-dose estramustine but this was not statistically significant. The present results support the assertion that estramustine is not necessary in docetaxel-based treatment regimens.     

Evaluation of docetaxel plus estramustine in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Objectives:   To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).
Methods:   Forty-six consecutive HRPC patients treated between January 2003 and March 2008 were included in this analysis. Docetaxel was given at a dose of 35 mg/m² twice every 3 weeks and oral estramustine concurrently for three consecutive days during weeks 1 and 2 of each cycle. During each treatment week, the dose of estramustine was 1260 mg on the first day, 980 mg on the second day and 840 mg on the third day. Patients were premedicated with 4 mg twice a day of oral dexamethasone for three consecutive days. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were evaluated at least once every 4 weeks.
Results:   Patients received a median of three cycles of chemotherapy. Of the evaluable 46 patients, 25 (54%) had a ≥50% PSA decline and 12 (26%) had a ≥75% PSA decline. Median time to PSA progression and overall survival time were 10.1 and 27.0 months, respectively. Median follow-up was 15.0 months. Major severe toxicities were grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in five (11%) patients. Mild toxicities included grade 1 or 2 nausea in eight (17%) patients. Two patients could not continue the treatment because of interstitial pneumonitis and a gastric hemorrhage, respectively.
Conclusions:   Docetaxel plus estramustine chemotherapy represents an active and well tolerated treatment for Japanese HRPC patients.     

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, estramustine and suramin for hormone refractory prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To investigate more effective chemotherapy against hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) with the combination of estramustine (EM), docetaxel, and suramin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients with symptomatic, progressive HRPC were included in this study. We evaluated the activity of the following schedule: EM 10 mg/kg orally daily on Days 1 to 21 every 28 days, docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) IV on Day 2 every 28 days and a total doses of 2150 mg of suramin in every cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or excessive toxicity. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 23.4 months. A median of 8.8 consecutive cycles was administered per patient. In the 25 patients with lymphadenopathy, there were three (12%) complete and 18 (72%) partial responses for a measurable disease response rate of 84%. Levels of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) decreased by greater than 50% in 100% of patients and by greater than 90% in 76.2%. The median time to progression was 57 weeks and median overall survival was 132 weeks. A decline in PSA of > or =50% lasting > or =30 days was significantly associated with a prolonged median time to progression and median overall survival. Tumor volume reduction and/or antitumor treatment effects were observed in 88% of patients. A significant decrease in mean pain score from 7.8 (range, 6-10) to 2.2 (range, 0-4) (P < 0.001) was achieved in 78%. Of patients with bone metastasis, 30.5% demonstrated a partial response. The mean Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score improved from 2.8 to 1.5 at the end of treatment period. There was no therapy-related death. The predominant toxicities were Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 33.3%, anemia in 21%, thrombocytopenia in 21.4%, cardiac ischemia in 4.7%, and rash in 4.7%. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel, EM, and suramin is a highly effective regimen for HRPC. Although hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were modest, these were easily managed medically.     

Phase-II study of docetaxel, estramustine phosphate, and carboplatin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel (DTX), estramustine phosphate (EMP), and carboplatin (CBDCA) in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: This study included a total of 40 HRPC patients. We evaluated the activity of the following schedule: weekly DTX 30 mg/m(2) iv, daily EMP 10mg/kg po, and CBDCA AUC=6 iv on day 1 of a every 4-wk cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or excessive toxicity. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response. A median of six consecutive cycles was administered per patient. Levels of prostate-specific antigen decreased by more than 50% in 95.0% of the patients. Consumption of medication for cancer-induced pain was reduced in 84.6%. Partial response was attained in 66.7% of measurable lesions. Of patients with bone metastasis, 8.3% demonstrated partial response. With a median follow-up of 11.4 mo, the median time to progression was 12.0 mo, and the median overall survival time was 26.6 mo. The predominant toxicities were grade-3 or -4 anemia in 32.5% of the patients, leukopenia in 20.0%, and thrombocytopenia in 17.5%. However, all toxicity was temporary and reversible with dose reduction or temporary cessation of chemotherapeutic agents. There were no therapy-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with DTX/EMP/CBDCA was found to have significant clinical activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in HRPC patients. More suitable selection of patients may be beneficial in terms of improved overall survival in the future.     

Prognostic and predictive factors in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and estramustine: a single institution experience

OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential prognostic and predictive factors in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) treated with docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: This analysis included 94 consecutive AIPC patients who were treated between March 2001 and May 2006 with biweekly docetaxel 45 mg/m(2) (day 2) and estramustine 140 mg three dimes daily (days 1-3). RESULTS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were observed in 45 of 84 evaluable patients (53%), whereas objective responses were observed in 16 of 40 patients with measurable disease (40%). Median survival (OS) was 16.2 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.9-19.4) and median time to PSA progression (TTP) 5.0 mo (95%CI, 3.6-7.1). OS was independently associated with pain score baseline PSA and weight loss. Patients with only extraosseous disease had higher PSA response rate (87% vs. 49%, p=0.014) and superior TTP compared with patients with bone metastases with or without extraosseous disease (7.3 vs. 4.3 vs. 4 mo, p=0.002). Concurrent bone and extraosseous metastases were associated with worse prognosis compared with each site alone (median OS: 12.3 vs.19 vs.18.3 mo, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AIPC treated with biweekly docetaxel and estramustine, baseline PSA >100, existence of pain, weight loss, and simultaneous extraosseous and bone disease were associated with worse prognosis. Extraosseous metastases seem to be more sensitive than bone disease to this chemotherapy.     

Safety and efficacy of docetaxel,estramustine phosphate and hydrocortisone in hormone‐refractory prostate cancer patients

Objective: To assess the combination of docetaxel (DTX), estramustine phosphate (EMP) and hydrocortisone for patients with hormone‐refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods: A total of 63 patients with HRPC were treated with a chemotherapeutic regimen including DTX, EMP, and hydrocortisone. Clinical and pathological features were correlated to serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) recurrence and survival rates. Incidence and degree of toxicities were also retrospectively reviewed. Results: A median of 11 courses of chemotherapy was administered per patient. PSA levels decreased by >50% in 32 (51%) patients and >90% in 18 (29%) patients. Median time to PSA progression was 6 months (range from 1 to 41 months) and median time of overall survival was 14 months (range from 1 to 56 months). In a univariate analysis to predict overall survival, PSA, hemoglobin, alkaliphosphatase, and performance status prior to the chemotherapy were significant factors. Despite grade 3–4 neutropenia in 87% of patients, grade 5 interstitial pneumonia in one patient and grade 4–5 myocardial infarction in two patients were recognized, the regimen seemed to be relatively safe. Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with DTX, EMP and hydrocortisone provides survival benefits for patients with HRPC with an acceptable toxicity profile. We need to further evaluate who might benefit most from this regimen.     

Estramustine in combination with vinblastine and mitomycin-C for patients with progressive androgen independent adenocarcinoma of the prostate

A phase II trial was performed to assess the antitumor activity and toxicity of estramustine in combination with vinblastine and mitomycin-C in 46 consecutive patients with androgen independent prostate cancer. All patients presented with disease progression following castrate serum testosterone levels and were treated for six consecutive weeks with three daily 140 mg doses of oral estramustine, vinblastine at 5 mg/m(2) weekly by intravenous bolus and mitomycin-C at 15 mg/m(2) every six weeks by intravenous bolus. Prostate specific antigen levels decreased by greater than 50% from baseline in 16 (41%; 95% CI 25-58%) and normalized in 11 (28%; 95% CI 14-45%) of 39 evaluable patients. Patients who demonstrated a greater than 50% reduction in PSA had a longer delay in time to disease progression. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild, predominately gastrointestinal. Hematologic toxicity was apparent in five patients with Grade III granulocytopenia and in 21 patients with Grade IV granulocytopenia of 43 evaluable patients for toxicity. Three patients were admitted to the hospital for neutropenic fever. Eight patients had Grade III thrombocytopenia, four patients had Grade IV thrombocytopenia, no bleeding occurred. Estramustine in combination with vinblastine and mitomycin-C is an active regimen. The non-hematologic toxicity was tolerable, while the hematologic toxicity required individual dosage reduction. The combination and the clinical significance of the decline in the PSA warrants further investigation.     

A phase I/II dose-escalation study of exisulind and docetaxel in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy, in a dose-escalation study, of exisulind (an oral sulphone metabolite of sulindac thought to induce apoptosis in malignant cells by inhibiting cGMP-phosphodiesterase) combined with docetaxel in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), as pre-clinical studies suggested activity against prostate cancer and synergy with cytotoxic agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with HRPC were treated with oral exisulind twice daily for 21-day cycles and intravenous docetaxel given for 1 h on the first day of each cycle. Three dose levels were assessed, combining exisulind 150 and 250 mg twice daily with docetaxel at 60 or 75 mg/m2. Toxicity was then evaluated using standard criteria. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose was determined to be exisulind 250 mg and docetaxel 60 mg/m2, with escalation to 75 mg/m2 after cycle 1, as tolerated. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities among all patients were neutropenia (56%), infection (24%) and hyperglycaemia (18%). Twelve of 32 evaluable patients (38%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 23-55%) had a decline in PSA by at least half. Only four of 17 evaluable patients (95% CI, 1-47%) treated at the phase II dose level had such a decline in PSA. The median (95% CI) overall survival of all patients was 16 (12.9-19.7) months and median progression-free survival 4.7 (2.7-5.2) months. CONCLUSION: The combination of exisulind and docetaxel was tolerable in patients with HRPC. The PSA response rates do not suggest an improvement over historical data with single-agent docetaxel in this population.     

Docetaxel, with or without estramustine phosphate, as first-line chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of a multicentre, randomized phase II trial

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of a randomized phase II trial of docetaxel with and without estramustine phosphate (EP) in patients with hormone‐refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with progressive HRPC were randomized to receive docetaxel 70 mg/m² on day 1 (arm A), or docetaxel 70 mg/m² on day 2 plus oral EP three times daily, at a total daily dose of 840 mg, on days 1–5 (arm B). The primary objective of the trial was to evaluate the activity of the treatments in terms of the response in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level.

RESULTS

Forty‐five of the 49 patients centrally randomized to arm A and 44 of the 46 in arm B were evaluable for activity. The PSA level decreased by ≥50% in 40% of the patients in arm A and in 75% of those in arm B. The median time to PSA progression was 20 weeks in arm A and 30 weeks in arm B. The patients in arm B had an improvement in pain over time.

CONCLUSION

These data support the existence of a possible advantage in combining docetaxel and EP, which should be verified in a specific randomized phase III study.     

Weekly paclitaxel plus estramustine combination therapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel used in combination with estramustine has been shown to exert synergistic cytotoxicity in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). There have been few reports of this therapy in an Asian male population. METHODS: Nine patients with progressive metastatic HRPC completed at least one cycle of combination therapy employing weekly paclitaxel plus estramustine. Paclitaxel was given weekly for 3 weeks as a 2-h intravenous infusion at a dose of 100 mg/infusion. The cycle was repeated every 4 weeks. A dose of 280 mg of oral estramustine was administrated twice daily for 21 days from the first day of each cycle. Both efficacy and toxicity were recorded. RESULTS: Grade 1 sensory neuropathy was seen in three patients (33%) and grade 4 thrombopenia/anemia was seen in one patient (11%). Performance status improved in three of seven patients (43%), while six patients (67%) showed a 50% or greater decline in prostate-specific antigen levels. Two of these patients experienced significant improvement in bone pain. One patient died of cardiac infarction during this trial and another died of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy subsequent to gastrointestinal bleeding. An additional patient suffered non-fatal pulmonary infarction. The one-year median survival rate was 22.2% and the overall survival period was 36 weeks. CONCLUSION: Although weekly paclitaxel plus estramustine may pose a significant risk, this combination may have a beneficial effect on the quality of life HRPC patients. A well-designed phase I-II trial in an Asian male population is highly recommended.     

Response to docetaxel/carboplatin-based chemotherapy as first- and second-line therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel/carboplatin (DC)‐based chemotherapy as first‐ and second‐line chemotherapy for patients with hormone‐refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients with HRPC treated with DC‐based chemotherapy at the Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute. Regimens either included estramustine (EDC) or not (DC). We identified patients who received EDC as first‐line chemotherapy and patients who received DC as second‐line or subsequent chemotherapy. Patients treated with EDC received 20–70 mg/m² docetaxel every 1–4 weeks, estramustine 140 mg three times daily and carboplatin (area under the curve, AUC), (4–6) every 3–4 weeks. Patients treated with DC received docetaxel 50–70 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC (4–6) every 3–4 weeks.

RESULTS

In all, the study included 54 patients; 24 received EDC and 30 DC (median age 62.8 and 66.9 years, respectively); their prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level at the start of chemotherapy was 112.7 and 213.3 ng/mL, respectively. There were declines of ≥50% in PSA level in 88% and 20% in the two groups, respectively. The median overall survival was 17.7 and 14.9 months in the EDC and DC groups, respectively. The most common reversible grade 4 toxicity with either regimen was neutropenia (4% and 7% in EDC and DC, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DC‐based chemotherapy is well tolerated and active in HRPC. Adding carboplatin to docetaxel provides an additional activity in 20% of patients as a second‐line or subsequent chemotherapy.     

Bi-weekly epirubicin, etoposide and low-dose dexamethasone for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy and favorable toxicity profile of chemotherapy regimens given at lower doses and frequent intervals. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a bi-weekly chemohormonal regimen consisting of epirubicin, etoposide, and low-dose dexamethasone (EED) in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: We treated a total of 32 patients who had failed hormonal therapy and antiandrogen withdrawal. Chemotherapy was given every 2 weeks and consisted of epirubicin (30 mg/m2 intravenously, day 1) and etoposide (50 mg/m2 orally, days 1-7). Dexamethasone (1.5 mg orally, every other day) was given continuously until disease progression. Twenty patients (63%) had received prior treatment with estramustine phosphate. Each patient's pain response was evaluated according to analgesic use. Toxicity was graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). RESULTS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels showed a decline of 50% or greater in 16 of 32 patients (50%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 32-68%) with a median time to biochemical progression of 5 months (range, 4-9 months). The median survival for all patients was 10.5 months (range, 3-35 months). Four of 10 patients (40%) with measurable soft tissue lesions achieved partial response according to standard criteria. Eleven of 23 symptomatic patients (48%, 95% CI, 27-69%) experienced an improvement in pain with a median duration of 6 months. The regimen was tolerated well by the patients, with only four patients (12%) having grade 3 leukopenia. CONCLUSION: Chemohormonal EED regimen proved to be active and well-tolerated in patients with HRPC.     

9-Nitrocamptothecin as second line chemotherapy for men with progressive, metastatic, hormone refractory prostate cancer: Results of the CALGB 99901

BACKGROUND: Institution of early hormone therapy in the PSA era coupled with demonstration of clinical benefit with chemotherapy in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) and acceptance of PSA decline as a surrogate for response has resulted in introduction of chemotherapy earlier in the natural history of disease. There now exists a need to identify, effective agents for second line chemotherapy. 9-nitrocamptothecin (9-NC) a novel, oral camptothecin analogue was tested as second line chemotherapy for patients with progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer with performance status (0-1) following progression on at least 1 prior cytotoxic chemotherapy. 9-NC was administered orally at the dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days each week for 3 weeks, followed by rest for 1 week. Response was evaluated after 2 cycles according to the guidelines set forth for Phase II trials in HRPC by the PSA working group. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were recruited to the study within a period of 6 months; 33 were evaluable for analysis. No patients had a >50% decline in PSA levels. Two out of 8 (25%) patients with measurable disease and 5/25 (20%) patients with nonmeasurable disease showed stable disease. The median time to disease and PSA progression was 2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9-2.8]. The median overall survival was 10 months (95% CI = 5-12). Seven patients are alive after a median follow-up of 23 months. CONCLUSIONS: 9-nitrocamptothecin failed to elicit clinical or PSA responses. Further study in pretreated HRPC patients is not warranted.     

Support ellagic acid therapy in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) on standard chemotherapy using vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate

BACKGROUND: Recent phase III studies in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) showed an improvement in terms of overall survival (OS), objective response (OR) and biochemical response (BR); however, chemotherapy is usually accompanied by negative side effects that determines poor quality of life (QoL) and only marginally improves individual clinical response (ICR) in terms of pain relief and performance status. Ellagic acid is a polyphenol that is found in many species of flowering plants. It is an antioxidant that determines apoptosis, down regulation of IGF-II, activates p21 (waf1/Cip1), mediates the cumulative effect on G1/S transition phase and prevents destruction of p-53 gene by cancer cells. ENDPOINTS: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ellagic acid support therapy on toxicity, OR, ICR and BR in HRPC patients treated with estramustine phosphate and vinorelbine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with HRPC were randomly distributed in two study groups: a control group (group A) who underwent chemotherapy with vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate, and an experimental group (group B) where chemotherapy regimen was associated with ellagic acid. RESULTS: The mean number of chemotherapy cycles/patient was 4 (range 3-8 cycles) and 6.5 (range 5-11) in group A and B patients, respectively. A reduction in systemic toxicity, statistically significant for neutropenia, associated with better results in term of OR rate, ICR, and BR were observed in group B compared with group A. On the contrary no significant difference in OS and PFS was detected between groups. CONCLUSIONS: our study suggests that the use of ellagic acid as support therapy reduces chemotherapy induced toxicity, in particular neutropenia, in HRCP patients; however, further studies are required to confirm our results.     

Lycopene: a novel drug therapy in hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: In a prospective study we evaluated the efficacy of lycopene for the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2002, 20 consecutive patients (median age 72; range 56-90) with metastatic HRPC were enrolled in the study. Lycopene in the dose of 10 mg/day was administered for a period of 3 months. Inclusion criteria were patients previously treated with hormonal therapy now with clinical and biochemical evidence of disease progression. A complete response (CR) was defined as a normalization of PSA (<4 ng/mL) and the disappearance of any sign of disease for at least 8 weeks. A partial response was defined as a >50% decrease in PSA level for at least 8 weeks associated with improvement (or no worsening) in ECOG PS and relief of bone pain if present. Stable disease (SD) was defined as a <50% decrease or <25% increase in the PSA level associated with no worsening of ECOG PS and/or bone pain for at least 8 weeks. RESULTS: One patient (5%) had complete response. Partial response was achieved in 6 (30%), disease remained stable in 10 (50%) and progressed in three (15%) patients. ECOG PS was Grade 0 in five, Grade I in 10 and Grade II in five of the 20 patients. It improved from Grade I to 0 in seven and Grade II to I in three patients. It deteriorated in three and remained unchanged in the rest seven patients. Bone pain was present in 16 (Grade 1 in six and Grade 2 in 10) of the 20 patients. Grade 1 changed to Grade 0 in five and Grade II changed to Grade 1 in five patients. Bone pain remained unchanged in 5 (31%) and worsened in 1 (6%). Ten (62%) patients managed to cut down the dose of analgesics on daily basis. Eighteen patients had associated LUTS, which improved (Q max > or = 12 mL/sec) in 11 (61%) patients. The median duration of response was 25 weeks (range 12-72 weeks). No drug intolerance or toxicity was encountered in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Lycopene therapy appears to be effective and safe in the treatment of HRPC. It not only takes care of the rising PSA but also improves the ECOG performance status, bone pain and LUTS. Because of its relative innocuousness it should be tried before the use of more toxic substances.     

多西紫杉醇治疗激素难治性前列腺癌的研究

目的研究多西紫杉醇3周方案治疗激素难治性前列腺癌的疗效、毒副反应。方法对HRPC患者进行3周方案化疗：多西紫杉醇75mg／m2（第一天）,泼尼松5mg,口服hid,21d为一周期。反应严重的患者之后的给药剂量改为70mg／m2。观察患者的前列腺特异性抗原水平、病灶的变化、毒副反应。结果12例患者经治疗后PSA均有下降,5例PSA下降〉50％。治疗前后PSA中位数分别为28和18,两者比较有统计学差异。复查MRI中2例出现病灶减小。所有患者骨扫描未见新发灶,骨痛的患者中50％有不同程度缓解。主要的副反应为骨髓抑制。结论多西紫杉醇3周方案对于我国HRPC患者的疗效是肯定的,但毒副反应对化疗进程影响很大,本研究建议将不能耐受的患者药物剂量降为70mg／m2。     

Immunological monitoring during combination of patient-oriented peptide vaccination and estramustine phosphate in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Additive antitumor effects could be achieved by combination of immunotherapy and cytotoxic agents with no or minimum suppression. METHODS: Thirteen patients positive for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24 or -A2 with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) who had failed to respond to the prior-peptide vaccination were entered in the combined peptide vaccination and estramustine phosphate. Conducted immune monitoring on those 13 patients were mainly peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) precursor analysis by IFN-gamma productions and peptide-reactive IgG by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Grade 3 arrhythmia or cerebral infarction was observed in two cases, and Grade 1 or 2 dermatologic reaction at the vaccination sites was observed in all 13 cases. Eleven patients who received more than one cycle of treatment were eligible for immunological and clinical evaluation. There was no significant immunosuppression in most cases when the peptide and a half dose (280 mg/day) of estramustine were administrated, whereas severe immunosuppression was observed in the first two patients who received both the peptide and a full dose (560 mg/day) estramustine. Augmentation of peptide-specific CTL precursors or peptide-specific IgG was observed in 6 of 11 or 10 of 11 cases, respectively. Ten of 11 patients showed serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level decrease from the baseline including 8 patients with a serum PSA level decrease of > or =50%. CONCLUSIONS: These results encouraged the further evaluation of the combination of peptide vaccination and low-dose estramustine phosphate for metastatic HRPC patients.