Should all prostate needle biopsy Gleason score 4 + 4 = 8 prostate cancers be high risk? Implications for shared decision-making and patient counselling

ObjectivesTo estimate the probability of downgrading to Gleason score ≤7 at radical prostatectomy for men with a prostate needle biopsy demonstrating Gleason score 8 (4 + 4).MethodsThis is a retrospective review of men with Gleason score 8 (4 + 4) prostate cancer on needle biopsy who then underwent a radical prostatectomy at the Karmanos Cancer Institute or the University of Michigan. Men with any pattern 5 on the diagnostic biopsy were excluded. The objective was to estimate the proportion of patients whose tumors were downgraded to Gleason score ≤7 at radical prostatectomy and to identify clinical and biopsy parameters associated with downgrading.ResultsMedian age of our cohort was 63 years (IQR: 59, 67.5) and median follow-up was 15 months (IQR: 7, 37). Of the 105 men that met inclusion criteria, 59% (62/105) were downgraded to Gleason score ≤7 at radical prostatectomy. Having ≤2 cores demonstrating Gleason score 8, ≤50% maximal tumor involvement of any individual core positive for Gleason score 8, or the presence of Gleason pattern 3 (such as 3 + 4, 4 + 3, or 3 + 3) in other biopsy cores were all independently associated with downgrading in our multivariable model. Depending on the absence, presence, or combination of these 3 factors, patients had an estimated 6% to 82% probability of having their tumor downgraded at radical prostatectomy.ConclusionsMen with low volume Gleason 8 (4 + 4) and/or the presence Gleason pattern 3 on prostate needle biopsy often have their tumors downgraded at radical prostatectomy. The presence of these preoperative biopsy parameters could affect pretreatment counseling and impact patient management.     

Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We examined the implications of underestimating Gleason score by prostate biopsy in patients with biopsy Gleason 6 prostate cancer with respect to adverse pathological findings and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and pathological data on a cohort of 531 patients with Gleason score 6 on prostate biopsy who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between June 1992 and January 2002. Patients were excluded if they received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score was examined. A comparison was made with respect to final radical prostatectomy specimen pathology and the risk of biochemical recurrence between cases that remained Gleason 6 and those with a final grade of 7 or greater. RESULTS: A total of 451 patients were included in the analysis. Mean followup was 55.1 months (range 12 to 123.4). Of the patients 184 (41%) had a Gleason score of 7 or greater after a review of the entire prostate, while 37 (8%) had a score of less than 6 and 230 remained with Gleason 6. Patients who were under graded were more likely to have extraprostatic extension (22% vs 4%, p <0.01), seminal vesicle invasion (9% vs 2%, p <0.01) and biochemical recurrence (10% vs 3%, p <0.01) compared to those who remained with Gleason score 6. CONCLUSIONS: Gleason grade on needle biopsy is an inexact predictor of the final grade following radical prostatectomy. Patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 who are under graded are at significantly higher risk for adverse pathological features and biochemical recurrence than patients who remain with Gleason score 6 or less on final pathology findings.     

Contemporary preoperative parameters predict cancer-free survival after radical prostatectomy: a tool to facilitate treatment decisions

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening has heralded stage migration in prostate cancer toward cancers that may be readily eliminated by primary intervention. We sought to identify contemporary, preprostatectomy measures of cancer severity useful and significant for predicting postprostatectomy, recurrence-free survival. The association of baseline variables clinical variables (age, clinical stage, serum PSA, and race) and prostate biopsy parameters (Gleason score, presence of perineural invasion, number of biopsy cores with cancer, and the greatest percentage of a biopsy core occupied by cancer--GPC) with recurrence-free survival was evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression among consecutive patients that underwent radical prostatectomy as primary therapy between 1994 and 2002. Tables were generated depicting expected 5-year recurrence-free survival after prostatectomy. From 1414 patients, 183 developed biochemical recurrence, 8 died from prostate cancer, and 31 died of all causes. Multivariable Cox regression found that clinical stage, PSA, Gleason score, and the greatest percentage of a biopsy core involved by cancer (GPC), were each significant determinants of post-prostatectomy, PSA recurrence-free survival (P < 0.05 for each). Gleason score and GPC were also significantly associated with clinical recurrence-free survival and cancer death, whereas other biopsy parameters and PSA were not. The amount of cancer in a biopsy core is a significant predictor of recurrence-free survival after prostatectomy, and is a simple clinical measure that complements baseline PSA, and Gleason score in predicting outcome. Tabulated 5-year PSA-free survival outcomes, stratified by these preoperative parameters, provide a basis for preoperative counseling of patients regarding postprostatectomy cancer control expectations.     

Gleason grade remains an important prognostic predictor in men diagnosed with prostate cancer while on finasteride therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate men treated with finasteride for lower urinary tract symptoms, who subsequently were diagnosed with prostate cancer and had a radical prostatectomy (RP) at our institution, to determine if finasteride therapy prevented accurate Gleason grade assignment and prediction of biochemical recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1996 and July 2003, 45 men were identified who had RP and had previously been treated with finasteride for > or = 6 months before the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clinical and pathological information was gathered from a RP database. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, duration of finasteride therapy, biopsy Gleason grade, clinical stage, RP Gleason grade and pathological stage were reviewed. Freedom from recurrence was predicted using validated nomograms before and after RP, and compared against actuarial 5-year freedom from recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The mean duration of finasteride therapy before diagnosis was 23.6 months, the mean serum PSA (doubled to account for finasteride use) 11.02 ng/mL and mean biopsy Gleason score 6. When comparing the biopsy and RP specimen Gleason score, it was downgraded by 1 point in six men, upgraded by 1 point in eight, and upgraded by 2 points in one. The Gleason score was constant in 30 patients. The nomograms predicted freedom from recurrence in 83% and 85%, respectively; the 5-year actuarial freedom from recurrence was 86%. CONCLUSION: Finasteride does not appear to compromise the assignment of Gleason grade for use in prediction tools before or after RP in men undergoing prostate biopsy or RP. The actuarial 5-year freedom from recurrence was similar to that predicted by the validated nomograms. Gleason grade remains an important prognostic predictor in men treated with finasteride and undergoing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer.     

Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical followup for a large series of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy to identify clinical and/or pathological indicators of biochemical (prostate specific antigen [PSA]) recurrence. We then used those indicators to develop multivariate models for determination of recurrence probability following radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1982 to 1999, 2,091 consecutive men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (clinical stage T1c or T2 disease with Gleason score 5 or greater). Actuarial analysis was performed comparing freedom from biochemical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (PSA 0.2 ng./ml. or greater.) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Event time distributions for the time to recurrence were compared using the log rank statistic or the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The first model was developed using preoperative variables only and the second model using all available variables. Observed and predicted recurrence-free survival curves for different models were compared to select a model for calculation of predicted recurrence-free probabilities and confidence intervals. RESULTS: With a median followup of 5.9 years (range 1 to 17) 360 men (17%) had biochemical recurrence. Overall actuarial 5, 10 and 15-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were 84%, 72% and 61%, respectively. The relative risk of biochemical recurrence following surgery decreased with time, even after adjusted for other perioperative parameters. Variables identified for the preoperative model were biopsy Gleason score, clinical TNM stage and PSA. Variables identified for the postoperative model were prostatectomy Gleason score, PSA and pathological organ confinement status. Nomograms were generated and corrected for the decreasing relative risk of biochemical recurrence over time. CONCLUSIONS: Using 3 preoperative or postoperative parameters, these nomograms can easily be used to determine the 3, 5, 7 and 10-year biochemical recurrence-free survival probabilities among men who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in the modern era.     

The Volume of Prostate Cancer in the Biopsy Specimen Cannot Reliably Predict the Quantity of Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen on an Individual Basis

Previous studies suggest that prostate cancer with a volume of 0.5 ml. or less and a Gleason score of less than 7 may be clinically insignificant and may be managed with watchful waiting. A proposed method of determining the volume of cancer in the prostate gland has been the grade and volume of cancer present in the transrectal needle biopsy specimen. Volume of cancer in the biopsy specimen as a predictor of volume of cancer in the prostate gland was studied in 130 men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma. Of the men 46 (35 percent) had clinical stage T1c (nonpalpable) disease, while 84 (65 percent) had clinical stage T2 (palpable) disease. Each radical prostatectomy specimen was whole-mounted and step-sectioned for accurate cancer volume determination. Three parameters for measuring volume of cancer in the biopsy specimen (percentage of biopsy cores involved, millimeters of cancer per biopsy core and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimen) were determined and compared by Spearman rank correlation analysis. The percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimen was marginally better than the percentage of cores involved and the millimeters of cancer per biopsy core as a predictor of cancer volume in the radical prostatectomy specimen. While regression analysis revealed a direct correlation between the volume of cancer in the biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens (r = 0.51), there was significant variability in prostate cancer volume for a given percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimen since the standard error of the estimate was 6.1 ml. Of the 13 patients with 5 percent or less cancer volume and a Gleason score of less than 7 in the biopsy specimen 1 (8 percent) had a cancer smaller than 0.5 ml. in volume in the radical prostatectomy specimen. Therefore, the risk of removing clinically insignificant prostate cancer, even when the biopsy parameter indicates low volume disease, is less than 10 percent. Overall, only 3 study patients (2.3 percent) had a prostate cancer volume of less than 0.5 ml. With 97.7 percent of the men having a clinically significant cancer by a volume criterion, it is apparent that the majority of clinically insignificant prostate cancers remain undetected and untreated. Currently, transrectal needle biopsy does not provide adequate information for differentiating between clinically insignificant and life threatening prostate cancer on an individual basis.     

Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the percentage of cancer in prostate needle biopsies provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and/or biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: One hundred and forty prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Preoperative parameters analyzed were patient age, PSA, clinical stage, and the information obtained from sextant biopsies (Gleason score, maximum percentage of cancer in a core, percentage of tissue with cancer in all biopsies and the number of cores positive for cancer). Univariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) for the dependent variables (prostate cancer, organ-confined and biochemical relapse) were performed. RESULTS: The tumor was organ-confined in 73.6% of patients. In those patients studied for disease progression (n = 126), no biochemical recurrence was observed in 76.2%. In the multivariate analysis for organ-confined disease, the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level, the Gleason score and the clinical stage were the most accurate predictive factors of pathological stage. The multivariate analysis for the study of biochemical failure indicated that only the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level and the Gleason score were independent predictive factors. According to the logistic regression analysis for disease recurrence, 3 risk groups could be identified: low risk (less than 10% probability of disease progression), intermediate risk (30%) and high risk (more than 70%). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of cancer in prostate biopsy provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.     

Probability based diagnostic biopsy specimens as predictors of tumor grade and stage found

The Gleason score of prostatic adenocarcinoma in biopsy specimens was compared with the Gleason score of corresponding radical prostatectomy specimens from 78 patients with localized prostate cancer. Grading errors were found to be significant for well-differentiated (Gleason score 2-4) tumors. The accuracy was 6 (23%) for Gleason scores of 2-4 on needle biopsy. All of the Gleason scores of 8-10 on needle biopsy were graded correctly. When the preoperative Gleason score was <7, 20 (37%) patients had organ-confined lesions, while when preoperative Gleason score > or = 7, 5 (21%) patients were confined to the prostate. Discrepancies between the Gleason score of the biopsy material and prostatectomy specimens were larger for biopsy specimens with low Gleason scores than for biopsy specimens with high Gleason scores. Large differences existed between the Gleason histologic scores of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimens when only a single microscopic focus of the tumor in the biopsy specimen is low grade. Consequently, when tumor grade influences the clinical management of prostate cancer, patients with limited biopsy material, provided this material is not poorly differentiated, should probably undergo repeated biopsy to reduce the likihood of tumor sampling error. This awareness influences treatment policy, particularly for the watchful waiting criteria of prostate cancer.     

Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of the prostate biopsy Gleason grade to predict the prostatectomy Gleason grade varies tremendously in the literature. OBJECTIVES: Determine the accuracy and distribution of the prostate biopsy Gleason grade and prostatectomy Gleason grade at LCMC (Lahey Clinic Medical Center) and worldwide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 2890 patients who had not received preoperative hormones, and for whom preoperative and postoperative Gleason sums were available. Participants underwent radical prostatectomy at LCMC, an academic referral center, from 1982-2007. Studies for the meta-analysis were selected from Medline: 1994-2007. Search criteria included keywords "Gleason," "biopsy," and "prostatectomy," >/=200 patients, and whether the biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason scores categorized into the predefined Gleason grades. The meta-analysis included 15 studies and the LCMC database for 14,839 total patients. MEASUREMENTS: Gleason scores 2-6, 7, and 8-10 were converted to low, moderate, and high grade, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated. The kappa statistic and chi-square were used to compare biopsy and prostatectomy grades. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The percentage of patients in whom the prostatectomy grade was accurately predicted, upgraded, and downgraded was 58%, 36%, and 5% at LCMC and 63%, 30%, and 7% in the meta-analysis, respectively. The PPV for low-, moderate-, and high-grade cancer was 54%, 70%, and 60% for LCMC and 62%, 70%, and 50% for the meta-analysis, respectively. The sensitivity decreased with increasing Gleason grade (low, moderate, and high) for LCMC (91%, 38%, 28%) and the meta-analysis (90%, 40%, 33%), respectively. The distribution of low-, moderate-, and high-grade cancer on biopsy (69%, 25%, and 6%) and prostatectomy specimen (47%, 44%, and 9%) demonstrated only "fair" agreement (kappa, 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Patients and practitioners need to be cognizant of significant upgrading for low-grade disease and the downgrading for high-grade disease.     

Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy in men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We evaluated patients at our institution who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer to determine their long-term clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospective surgical database and identified 176 men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer from 1983 to 2003. Clinical and pathological data were reviewed and evaluated in a Cox proportional hazards model to determine preoperative predictors of biochemical recurrence. Clinical progression following biochemical recurrence was evaluated and clinical failure was defined as the development of clinical metastases or progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer. RESULTS: Of the 176 patients with cT3 prostate cancer 64 (36%) received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. At a mean followup of 6.4 years 84 (48%) patients had disease recurrence with a median time to biochemical recurrence of 4.6 years. The actuarial 10-year probability of freedom from recurrence was 44%. On multivariate analysis biopsy Gleason score, pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen and year of surgery were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was not a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence. Following biochemical recurrence clinical failure developed in 30 of 84 (36%) men with a median time of 11 years. Overall the 5, 10 and 15-year probabilities of death from prostate cancer were 6%, 15% and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: More than half (52%) of our patients remained free of disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy. In our series neoadjuvant hormonal therapy offered no advantage with respect to disease recurrence. Radical prostatectomy remains an integral component in the treatment of select patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer.     

Preoperative p27 status is an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen failure following radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: p27 is an important cell cycle regulator, and decreased expression in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with an increased risk of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure. To our knowledge no prior study has shown that preoperative p27 status independently predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prostate needle biopsy specimens of 161 men treated with radical prostatectomy were examined for p27 expression using immunohistochemistry. Various p27 cut points were examined for their ability to separate patients into groups with different risk for time to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The best p27 cut point was compared to other clinical variables (PSA, clinical stage, age, biopsy Gleason score and percent of prostate needle biopsy with cancer) on multivariate analysis to determine which variables independently predicted biochemical failure. RESULTS: A p27 cut point of less than 45% positive staining cells resulted in significant preoperative risk stratification for time to PSA failure (HR 2.41, p = 0.010). On multivariate analysis serum PSA (HR 1.04, p = 0.011), biopsy Gleason score (HR 1.51, p = 0.011), percent of biopsy tissue with cancer (HR 10.01, p = 0.001) and less than 45% p27 positive cells (HR 2.44, p = 0.014) were all independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative p27 expression is an independent predictor of time to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Patients with less than 45% p27 positive cells in the prostate needle biopsy specimen have almost a 2.5-fold increased risk of biochemical recurrence. To our knowledge this study is the first to show that p27 status of the prostate needle biopsy specimen can be used before radical prostatectomy to predict biochemical failure.     

Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

OBJECTIVE: The grade of the prostate cancer is an important factor in defining prognosis and deciding on treatment. In this study, we compared the Gleason score determined by 18-gauge core needle biopsies with both the Gleason score and pathological staging of the radical prostatectomy specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1992 and September 1998, we performed 144 radical retropubic prostatectomies for clinically localized prostatic carcinoma, after a negative frozen section in bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in all cases. Ten patients with pathologic stage T1a and T1b were excluded. The final study group consisted of 134 patients, all of whom had been diagnosed with adenocarcinoma by transrectal needle biopsies with an 18-gauge automated spring-loaded biopsy gun. No patients received neoadjuvant therapy, including androgen deprivation and radiation therapy. All patients had a designated Gleason score on the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: We found that grading error was greatest with well-differentiated (Gleason score 2-4) tumors, The accuracy was 15% for Gleason score 2-4 on needle biopsy. Of the 113 evaluable patients with Gleason score 5-7 on needle biopsy, 110 (97%) were graded correctly. All of the Gleason score 8-10 on needle biopsy was graded correctly. But only 1 patient in our series had Gleason score 8 on needle biopsy. Twenty-seven (25%) of 110 patients with a biopsy grade of Gleason score <7 had the cancer upgraded to 7. Of patients with both Gleason score <7 in the needle biopsy and Gleason score 7 in the prostatectomy specimen, only 3 (11%) had tumor confined to the prostate. CONCLUSION: The potential for grading error is greatest with well-differentiated tumors and of patients with both Gleason scores <7 in the needle biopsy and Gleason score 7 in the prostatectomy specimen, only 11% had tumor confined to the prostate. This effects treatment policy, especially for watchful waiting criteria.     

Lower prostate specific antigen outcome than expected following radical prostatectomy in patients with high grade prostate and a prostatic specific antigen level of 4 ng/ml. Or less

PURPOSE: We report the estimates of 10-year prostate specific antigen (PSA) outcome following radical prostatectomy in patients with or without grade 4 or 5 disease in the needle biopsy or prostatectomy specimen stratified by the presenting PSA level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 2001, 2,254 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer comprised the study cohort. PSA outcome was estimated using the actuarial method of Kaplan and Meier, and was stratified by the presenting PSA level and needle biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason score. RESULTS: The 10-year estimates of PSA outcome declined significantly (p 相似文献   

Score de Gleason des biopsies prostatiques et celui des pièces de prostatectomies: Quelle corrélation?

IntroductionThe Gleason score obtained on biopsies is an essential part of treatment decision making in prostate cancer. This score assesses aggressiveness and progression of the tumor.ObjectiveTo evaluate the correlation between Gleason score at needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimen.Subjects and MethodsWe reviewed the records of 30 patients treated for prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy and we evaluated the correlation between Gleason score on biopsy and prostatectomy specimen. Other parameters evaluated were age and PSA.ResultsThe concordance of Gleason score was 58.82%, upgraded in 35, 29% and downgraded in only 6%. The kappa coefficient was moderate = 0,329. Regarding groups of differentiation, this correlation was 50% in the well differentiated group (Gleason score 2 to 4) and 100% in moderately differentiated group (Gleason score 5 to 7). No patient was classified as poorly differentiated (Gleason score 8 to 10).ConclusionGleason score of biopsies may influence treatment and prognosis of localized prostate cancer. It is important to keep in mind that it does not always reflect the true Gleason score, especially in well differentiated cases.     

穿刺标本Gleason评分预测前列腺癌病理分级准确性的研究

目的 分析前列腺癌患者穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分的相关性,探讨影响穿刺标本Gleason评分准确性的可能因素.方法 回顾性分析86例接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者资料,比较穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分的符合情况,应用二分类Logistic回归分析筛选影响穿刺标本Gleason评分准确性的可能因素.结果 86例患者穿刺标本平均Gleason评分为6.1,根治术标本平均Gleason评分为6.5,穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分相比,评分相符42例(48.8%),评分偏低32例(37.2%),评分偏高1 2例(14.0%),差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05),偏差与患者年龄、血清PSA、前列腺体积、临床分期无显著相关性(P＞0.05),与穿刺针数(OR=2.905)及穿刺阳性率(OR=4.225)有显著相关(P＜0.05).结论 穿刺针数与穿刺阳性针数百分比是影响穿刺标本Gleason评分准确性的可能因素,增加前列腺穿刺活检针数将可能有助于提高穿刺标本预测前列腺癌病理分级的准确性.     

增加穿刺活检针数提高前列腺癌分级准确性的临床研究

目的 探讨增加穿刺活检针数能否提高前列腺癌穿刺标本Gieason评分准确性.方法 接受根治性前列腺切除的前列腺癌患者86例.平均年龄63(55～72)岁.术前PSA值平均16.8(1.6～57.2)ng/ml,前列腺体积平均39.4(18.1～114.1)ml.患者术前均未接受新辅助内分泌治疗,按经直肠前列腺穿刺针数分为2组.A组46例行标准6针系统穿刺,B组40例行13针系统穿刺.统计学比较分析2组穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分符合情况及影响因素. 结果 A组穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分相符16例(34.8%),B组为26例(65.O%),B组评分符合率明显高于A组(P＜0.05).当穿刺标本Gleason评分≤6时,B组评分相符11例(68.8%),明显高于A组5例(25.0%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析结果提示前列腺穿刺活检针数及活检阳性率是影响穿刺标本与根治术标本Gieason评分符合率的主要相关因素(P＜0.05).结论 增加穿刺针数能够提高经直肠前列腺穿刺标本Gleason评分预测前列腺癌分级的准确性.     

Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We examined the concordance of Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy specimens and the corresponding radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens in a cohort of patients grouped according to the number of cores obtained during diagnostic needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed clinical and pathological data on a cohort of 466 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer by needle biopsies who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between January 1, 1990 and July 31, 2001. Two study groups were identified, including 126 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by extended needle biopsies (10 or more cores) and 340 diagnosed with cancer by nonextended needle biopsies (9 or fewer cores). Mean age was 60 years and median prostate specific antigen was 5.8 ng./ml. The median number of cores in the extended and nonextended biopsy groups was 12 and 6, respectively. The concordance of Gleason score in the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens was compared and correlated with the number of cores on needle biopsy. RESULTS: In the whole cohort 311 patients (67%) had identical Gleason scores on the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens, while 53 (11%) were over graded and 102 (22%) were under graded on needle biopsy. In patients who underwent extended needle biopsies the accuracy rate for Gleason scoring was 76% with 10% over and 14% under graded. The highest accuracy rates were in patients with 13, 14 and 16 cores (89%, 87% and 100%, respectively). No patients in the extended needle biopsy group had a discrepancy of more than 2 Gleason units in grade in the biopsy and surgical specimens. In those who underwent nonextended needle biopsies the accuracy rate for Gleason scoring was 63% with 12% over and 25% under graded. There were significantly different rates of accuracy (p = 0.008) and under grading (p = 0.01) in the 2 needle biopsy groups. Patients with a needle biopsy Gleason score of less than 7 had significantly higher concordance with the prostatectomy Gleason score when extended biopsies were done compared with nonextended biopsies (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer grading by extended needle biopsy is a better predictor of the final Gleason score than nonextended needle biopsy, as determined by radical prostatectomy histological evaluation. Therefore, extended prostate needle biopsy provides better guidance to determine the appropriate treatment in patients with prostate cancer.     

Needle biopsy DNA ploidy status predicts grade shifting in prostate cancer

DNA ploidy analysis of prostate needle biopsy specimens was performed to determine whether ploidy status could predict tumor grade shifting at radical prostatectomy. The paired needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens from 111 randomly selected men with prostate cancer were obtained from the surgical pathology files of the Albany Medical Center Hospital. The original tumor grades were assigned by a staff of 12 surgical pathologists according to the Gleason system. Tumors with original Gleason scores < or = 6 were classified as low grade, and tumors with scores of > or = 7 were considered high grade. DNA ploidy analysis was performed on the needle biopsy specimens using the CAS 200 image analyzer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA) on Feulgen stained 5-microm tissue sections. There were 88 diploid and 23 nondiploid cases. Thirty-eight of 111 (34%) of cases had grade shifting from needle biopsy to radical prostatectomy specimens. Of 89 low-grade needle biopsy cases, 28 (31%) were upgraded at radical prostatectomy. Of 22 high-grade needle biopsy cases, 10 (45%) were downgraded to low grade at radical prostatectomy. Of the 28 low-grade needle biopsy specimens that were upgraded at radical prostatectomy, 19 (68%) featured an aneuploid histogram and 9 (32%) were diploid. Nineteen of 28 (68%) of aneuploid low-grade tumors on needle biopsy became high-grade at radical prostatectomy. Nine of 10 (90%) diploid high-grade tumors at needle biopsy became low-grade at radical prostatectomy. Of the 38 cases in which ploidy and grade were incongruous, 28 (74%) had grade shifting. In a multivariate regression analysis, a high-grade Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimens correlated significantly with needle biopsy ploidy (p = 0.0001) but not with needle biopsy grade (p = 0.15). The sensitivity of the needle biopsy grade in the detection of high-grade tumors on radical prostatectomy was 30%, and the specificity was 86%. The sensitivity of ploidy status in the prediction of high grade at radical prostatectomy was 78%, and the specificity was 96%. With a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >0.4 ng/ml as the indicator of post-radical prostatectomy disease recurrence on a subset of 106 patients, on univariate analysis, disease recurrence was predicted by needle biopsy ploidy (p = 0.001) and radical prostatectomy grade (p = 0.04) but not by needle biopsy grade (p = 0.39). On multivariate analysis, needle biopsy DNA ploidy status independently predicted disease recurrence (p = 0.002), whereas needle biopsy and prostatectomy grade did not. These results indicate that DNA ploidy analysis of needle biopsy specimens of prostate cancer predicts grade shifting, that it is a more sensitive and specific indicator of final tumor grade at radical prostatectomy than is the original needle biopsy grade, and that ploidy status independently predicts postoperative disease recurrence.     

Pathological findings of radical prostatectomy specimens in Japanese men diagnosed on single core positive prostate biopsy in eight with a Gleason score less than 4

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to analyze the pathological findings of radical prostatectomy specimens diagnosed on single core positive prostate biopsy in eight systematic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsies with a Gleason score 相似文献   

Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database

PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested that the percent of positive cores in the prostate needle biopsy is a significant predictor of outcome among men undergoing radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. We evaluate whether either percent of cores with cancer or percent of cores positive from the most and least involved side of the prostate needle biopsy was associated with a worse outcome among men treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective survey of 1,094 patients from the SEARCH Database treated with radical prostatectomy at 4 different equal access medical centers in California between 1988 and 2002 was undertaken. We used multivariate analysis to examine whether total percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer, percent of cores positive from each side of the prostate and other clinical variables were significant predictors of adverse pathology and time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence following radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis serum PSA and percent of positive cores were significant predictors of positive surgical margins, nonorgan confined disease and seminal vesicle invasion. Percent of positive cores (p <0.001), serum PSA (p = 0.008) and biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.014) were significant independent predictors of time to biochemical recurrence. On a separate multivariate analysis that included the variables of total percent of positive cores, percent of positive cores from the most involved side of the biopsy, percent of positive cores from the least involved side of the biopsy and whether the biopsy was positive unilaterally or bilaterally, only the percent of positive cores from the most involved side of the biopsy was a significant independent predictor of PSA failure following radical prostatectomy. Percent of positive cores was used to separate patients into a low risk (less than 34%), intermediate risk (34% to 50%) and high risk (greater than 50%) groups, which provided significant preoperative risk stratification for PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). Percent of positive cores cut points were able to further risk stratify men who were at low (p = 0.001) or intermediate (p = 0.036) but not high (p = 0.674) risk for biochemical failure based on serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score. CONCLUSIONS: Percent of positive cores in the prostate needle biopsy was a significant predictor of adverse pathology and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy, and the cut points of less than 34%, 34% to 50% and greater than 50% can be used to risk stratify patients preoperatively. The finding that percent of positive cores from the most involved side of the biopsy was a stronger predictor of PSA failure than the total percent of cores involved suggests that multiple positive biopsies from a single side might be a better predictor of a larger total cancer volume and thus correlate with clinical outcome.