Correlation of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FLT and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG uptake on PET with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose The nucleoside analogue 3′-deoxy-3′-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) has recently been introduced for imaging cell proliferation with positron emission tomography (PET). We prospectively evaluated whether FLT uptake reflects proliferative activity as indicated by the Ki-67 index in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸F-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG). Methods A total of 18 patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC were examined with both FLT PET and FDG PET. PET imaging was performed at 60 min after each radiotracer injection. Tumour lesions were identified as areas of focally increased uptake, exceeding background uptake in the lungs. For semi-quantitative analysis, the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV) was calculated. Proliferative activity as indicated by the Ki-67 index was estimated in tissue specimens. Immunohistochemical findings were correlated with SUVs. Results The sensitivity of FLT and FDG PET for the detection of lung cancer was 72% and 89%, respectively. Four of the five false-negative FLT PET findings occurred in bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma. The mean FLT SUV was significantly lower than the mean FDG SUV. A significant correlation was observed between FLT SUV and Ki-67 index (r = 0.77; p < 0.0002) and for FDG SUV (r = 0.81; p < 0.0001). Conclusion The results of this preliminary study suggest that, compared with FDG, FLT may be less sensitive for primary staging in patients with NSCLC. Although FLT uptake correlated significantly with proliferative activity in NSCLC, the correlation was not better than that for FDG uptake.     

Performance of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrent endometrial cancer

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) using 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), compared with PET alone, in the diagnosis of suspected endometrial cancer recurrence. Methods Thirty women who had undergone primary surgery for histopathologically proven endometrial cancer with suspected recurrence because of clinical, cytological, biochemical, and/or radiological findings were enrolled in this study. PET and integrated PET/CT images were evaluated by two different experienced radiologists by consensus for each modality. A final diagnosis of recurrence was confirmed by histopathology, other imaging and clinical follow-up for longer than 1 year. The statistical significance of differences between PET and PET/CT was determined by the McNemar test. Results Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT were 93% (14/15), 93% (14/15), and 93% (28/30), respectively, whereas for PET, the corresponding data were 80% (12/15), 80% (12/15), and 80% (24/30), respectively (P = 0.479, 0.479, and 0.134, respectively). CT from PET/CT resolved the false-positive PET results because of hyper-metabolic activity of benign inflammatory lesions and physiological variants and moreover detected lung metastasis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis that PET missed. However, tiny para-aortic lymph node metastasis could not be detected even with PET/CT. Conclusions Integrated FDG-PET/CT is a useful complementary modality for providing good anatomic and functional localization of sites of recurrence during follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer.     

Dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between 18F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions

Objective  The aim of this study is to clarify the difference of F-18 FDG uptake kinetics between FDG-avid non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions associated with various etiologies on dual-time point PET/CT scan, and to determine the optimal parameter for differentiation. Materials and methods  The materials were 76 FDG-avid solitary NSCLC in 76 patients and 57 FDG-avid solitary benign lesions associated with various etiologies in 61 patients. FDG PET/CT scan was performed at 60 and 120 min after intravenous injection of 4.4 MBq/kg F-18 FDG. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on early and delayed scans and the percent change of SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax) between the two time points were measured. The optimal differential parameter was determined by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Results  The mean ± SD of early SUV max, delayed SUVmax and %ΔSUVmax were 8.3 ± 5.2, and 10.2 ± 6.5, and 21.9% ± 18.9 in FDG-avid NSCLC, and 3.8 ± 3.2, 4.0 ± 3.7, and 11.3% ± 26.0 in FDG-avid benign lesions, respectively. Delayed SUVmax in NSCLC was significantly higher than early SUVmax (P < 0.0001); while not different in benign lesions. Percent change of SUVmax in NSCLC was also significantly higher than that in benign lesions (P < 0.01). The optimal parameter for the differentiation was delayed SUVmax > 5.5 and yielded sensitivity of 77.6%, specificity of 80.7% and accuracy of 78.9%, which provided better differentiation than the use of %ΔSUVmax or the traditional parameter of early SUVmax > 2.5. However, 11 (19.2%) benign lesions were indistinguishable from NSCLC. Conclusion  Although delayed PET/CT scan enhances the difference of FDG uptake between FDG-avid NSCLC and benign lesions, and the use of delayed SUVmax > 5.5 appears to improve the differentiation of these hypermetabolic lesions compared with an early scan, careful interpretation and management for correct differentiation are still required.     

Differential diagnosis between 18F-FDG-avid metastatic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer and benign nodes on dual-time point PET/CT scan

Objective  To clarify the difference of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake kinetics between FDG-avid metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and FDG-avid benign LNs associated with various etiologies on dual-time point PET/CT scan, and to determine the optimal parameter for differentiation. Methods  The subjects were 134 FDG-avid metastatic LNs in 67 patients with NSCLC and 62 FDG-avid benign LNs in 61 patients with various lung disorders including NSCLC. PET/CT scan was performed at 2 time points (at 60 min and at 120 min) after intravenous injection of 4.4 MBq/kg ¹⁸F-FDG. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on early and delayed scans and the percent change of SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax) were measured at each FDG-avid LN. The optimal parameter for differentiation was determined by the receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Results  Delayed SUVmax was increased compared with early SUVmax in 114 (85.0%) FDG-avid metastatic LNs and 42 (67.7%) FDG-avid benign LNs, with significant higher delayed SUVmax than early values (7.0 ± 5.0 vs. 5.9 ± 3.4; P < 0.0001, and 3.0 ± 1.3 vs. 2.8 ± 1.0; P < 0.05, respectively). Early and delayed SUVmax and %ΔSUVmax in metastatic LNs were significantly higher than those in benign LNs (P < 0.0001). The optimal parameter for the differentiation was the combined use of early SUVmax > 3.0 or delayed SUVmax > 4.0, yielding sensitivity of 88.8%, specificity of 80.6%, accuracy of 86.2%, negative predictive value of 76.9%, and positive predictive value of 90.6%. It provided better results than the use of early SUVmax > 3.0 alone (P = 0.019) or the optimal parameter for %ΔSUVmax (>5%) (P = 0.012). However, 12 (19.3%) benign LNs were indistinguishable from metastatic LNs. Conclusions  Although dual-time point PET/CT scan enhances the difference of FDG uptake between FDG-avid metastatic and benign LNs and improves the differentiation when compared with a single scan, biopsy procedure may be still required for accurate assessment of LN status in patients with NSCLC and possible etiologies showing intensive FDG uptake in benign LNs.     

Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT

Purpose  The purpose of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with IV contrast for preoperative staging of ovarian cancer, in comparison with enhanced CT, using surgical and histopathological findings as the reference standard. Materials and methods  Forty patients with ovarian cancer underwent FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT scans for staging before primary debulking surgery. PET/CT and the CT component separately, were interpreted by two experienced radiologists by consensus for each investigation. Status with regard to lesion inside and outside the pelvis was determined on the basis of histopathology. The significance of differences between the two imaging modalities was determined using the McNemar test. Results  Staging revealed stage I in 18 patients (IA, n = 9; IB, n = 3; IC, n = 6), stage II in seven (IIA, n = 2; IIB, n = 3; IIC, n = 2), stage III in 14 (IIIA, n = 1; IIIB, n = 3; IIIC, n = 10), and stage IV in one. The results of CT and PET/CT were concordant with the final pathological staging in 22 out of 40 (55%) and 30 out of 40 (75%) cases, respectively. The overall lesion-based sensitivity improved from 37.6% (32 out of 85) to 69.4% (59 out of 85), specificity from 97.1% (578 out of 595) to 97.5% (580 out of 595), and accuracy from 89.7% (610 out of 680) to 94.0% (639 out of 680) between CT and PET/CT. There were significant differences in sensitivity and accuracy, with p values of 5.6 × 10⁻⁷ and 1.2 × 10⁻⁷, respectively. Conclusion  Integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT is a more accurate imaging modality for staging ovarian cancer and useful for selecting appropriate treatment than enhanced CT.     

Performance of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer

The purpose is to evaluate the accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/CT, compared with PET alone, for diagnosis of suspected recurrence of uterine cervical cancer. Fifty-two women who had undergone treatment for histopathologically proven cervical cancer received PET/CT with suspected recurrence. PET-alone and integrated PET/CT images were evaluated by two different experienced radiologists by consensus for each investigation. A final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology, radiological imaging, and clinical follow-up for over 1 year. Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT were 92.0% (23/25), 92.6% (25/27), and 92.3% (48/52), respectively, while for PET, the corresponding figures were 80.0% (20/25), 77.8% (21/27), and 78.8% (41/52), respectively. PET/CT resolved the false-positive PET results due to hypermetabolic activity of benign/inflammatory lesions and physiological variants, and was able to detect lung metastasis, local recurrence, peritoneal dissemination, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and pelvic lymph node metastasis missed by PET alone. However, tiny local recurrence and lymph node metastasis could not be detected even by PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT is a useful complementary modality for providing good anatomic and functional localization of sites of recurrence during follow-up of patients with cervical cancer.     

Comparison of MET-PET and FDG-PET for differentiation between benign lesions and malignant tumors of the lung

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively assessed and compared the usefulness of 11C-methionine (MET)-PET with that of 18F-FDG-PET for the differentiation between benign lesions and malignant tumors of the lung. METHODS: We examined 101 patients with a suspected lung tumor including 79 patients with primary lung cancer and 22 patients with benign lesions. One hundred and forty PET studies (46 studies with MET-PET and 94 studies with FDG-PET) were performed. Both MET-PET and FDG-PET were performed on 39 patients. The MET-PET was performed 15 minutes after the administration of 67-740 MBq of MET, and FDG-PET 45 minutes after the administration of 30-437 MBq of FDG. The results were then evaluated by the standardized uptake value (SUV). RESULTS: The MET uptake in lung cancer was 3.69+/-1.22 (n = 37) which was significantly higher than that in benign lesions 1.81+/-1.04 (n = 9) (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MET-PET were 83.8%, 88.9% and 84.8%, respectively, when 2.66 of SUV was used as the cutoff value. The FDG uptake in lung cancer was 5.94+/-2.89 (n = 75) and was also significantly larger than that in benign lesions 2.46+/-1.01 (n = 19) (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET were 81.3%, 78.9% and 80.9%, respectively (cutoff = 3.20). The MET uptake in the lesions correlated significantly with FDG uptake (r = 0.71, p < 0.001). According to an ROC analysis, the area under the curve for MET-PET (area = 0. 833) was higher than that for FDG-PET (area = 0.828), but the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, the combined use of MET-PET and FDG-PET did not improve the diagnostic ability. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, both MET-PET and FDG-PET were considered to be equally useful for the differential diagnosis of lung tumors. Furthermore, MET uptake in lung lesions was found to correlate significantly with FDG uptake.     

(18)F-FDG PET versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for adrenal gland lesion characterization: a comparison of diagnostic efficacy in lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of integrated PET/CT using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the differentiation of benign and metastatic adrenal gland lesions in patients with lung cancer and to compare the diagnostic efficacy with the use of PET alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one adrenal lesions (size range, 5-104 mm; mean size, 16 mm) were evaluated retrospectively in 42 lung cancer patients. Both PET images alone and integrated PET/CT images were assessed, respectively, at two-month intervals. PET findings were interpreted as positive if the FDG uptake of adrenal lesions was greater than or equal to that of the liver, and the PET/CT findings were interpreted as positive if an adrenal lesion show attenuation > 10 HU and showed increased FDG uptake. Final diagnoses of adrenal gland lesions were made at clinical follow-up (n = 52) or by a biopsy (n = 9) when available. The diagnostic accuracies of PET and PET/CT for the characterization of adrenal lesions were compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Thirty-five (57%) of the 61 adrenal lesions were metastatic and the remaining 26 lesions were benign. For the depiction of adrenal gland metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET were 74%, 73%, and 74%, respectively, whereas those of integrated PET/CT were 80%, 89%, and 84%, respectively (p values; 0.5, 0.125, and 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of integrated PET/CT is more accurate than the use of PET alone for differentiating benign and metastatic adrenal gland lesions in lung cancer patients.     

Cutaneous metastatic lung cancer detected with18F-FDG PET

A 48-year-old male smoker presented with a chief complaint of persistent cough for three months. A CT scan revealed only a large right paratracheal mass. The plan was to obtain histological confirmation of suspected lung cancer via bronchoscopy and mediastinoscopy. A whole body 18F-FDG (2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose) PET Scan was ordered for staging and localization of the most accessible biopsy site. There was a large, intense hypermetabolic focus corresponding to the paratracheal lesion seen on CT, as well as a lesion in the right adrenal gland. There was also a superficial, subcutaneous hypermetabolic lesion in the mid-back. The subcutaneous lesion, which previously had not been noted, was biopsied and proved to be metastatic adenocarcinoma consistent with the lung primary. This case illustrates the clinical utility of reporting soft tissue abnormalities, which may provide an alternative, more readily accessible location for biopsy that is both safer and less expensive than bronchoscopy or mediastinoscopy.     

18F-FDG PET/CT引导局部晚期非小细胞肺癌靶区剂量提升的可行性研究

目的 研究基于放疗前正电子发射计算机断层显像（PET/CT）的标准摄取值（SUV）梯度引导局部晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）患者靶向剂量提升的可行性及剂量学特点。方法 收集29例NSCLC患者的放疗前PET/CT图像,在PET/CT图像上勾画大体肿瘤靶区（GTV）,以最大SUV值（SUV_max）的50%和75%为阈值将GTV分割为3个代谢活性亚区域,低于50%SUV_max的区域为GTV1,50%SUV_max到75%SUV_max的区域为GTV2,高于75%SUV_max的区域为GTV3。计划靶区（PTV）、PTV1、PTV2、PTV3分别由GTV、GTV1、GTV2及GTV3外放适当边界得到。计划1：在PTV上照射均匀60 Gy处方剂量。计划2：将PTV1、PTV2和PTV3的处方剂量分别设置为60~66 Gy、66~72 Gy和≥72 Gy。比较两种治疗计划靶区和危及器官（OAR）的剂量学差异。结果 相对于计划1,计划2将2%的PTV体积接受的剂量（D₂）由66.5 Gy提升至78.5 Gy,剂量提升约20%;PTV的平均剂量提升了8.9%（63.2~68.8 Gy）、PTV1,PTV2、PTV3的平均剂量分别提升了2.8%（62.7~64.4 Gy）、10.3%（63.5~70.0 Gy）、18.7%（63.8~75.8 Gy）。各亚区域剂量均得到有效提升。计划1与计划2 中PTV的60 Gy剂量线靶区覆盖度基本相当,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,均匀性指数（HI）的差异有统计学意义（t=23.3, P<0.05）,计划2中随着最大剂量的提升,HI下降显著。肺、心脏和脊髓的受照剂量在两个治疗计划中基本相当,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 对不同代谢活性梯度实施差异化的放疗剂量,在不增加危及器官辐射剂量的前提下,可对代谢活性高的亚区域进行靶向剂量提升,具有提高肿瘤局部控制的潜能。     

Nonionic intravenous contrast agent does not cause clinically significant artifacts to <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT in patients with lung cancer

Objective This study was performed to evaluate the effects of intravenous (i.v.) contrast agent on semi-quantitative values and lymph node (LN) staging of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with lung cancer. Methods Thirty-five patients with lung cancer were prospectively included. Whole-body PET and nonenhanced CT images were acquired 60 min following the i.v. injection of 370 MBq ¹⁸F-FDG and subsequently, enhanced-CT images were acquired with the i.v. administration of 400 mg iodinated contrast agent without positional change. PET images were reconstructed with both nonenhanced and enhanced CTs, and the maximum and average standardized uptake values (SUV_max and SUV_ave) calculated from lung masses, LNs, metastatic lesions, and normal structures were compared. To evaluate the effects of the i.v. contrast agent on LN staging, we compared the LN status on the basis of SUVs (cut-offs; SUV_max = 3.5, SUV_ave = 3.0). Results The mean differences of SUV_max in normal structures between enhanced and nonenhanced PET/CT were 15.23% ± 13.19% for contralateral lung, 8.53% ± 6.11% for aorta, 5.85% ± 4.99% for liver, 5.47% ± 6.81% for muscle, and 2.81% ± 3.05% for bone marrow, and those of SUV_ave were 10.17% ± 9.00%, 10.51% ± 7.89%, 4.95% ± 3.89%, 5.66% ± 9.12%, and 2.49% ± 2.50%, respectively. The mean differences of SUV_max between enhanced and nonenhanced PET/CT were 5.89% ± 3.92% for lung lesions (n = 41), 6.27% ± 3.79% for LNs (n = 76), and 3.55% ± 3.38% for metastatic lesions (n = 35), and those of SUV_ave were 3.22% ± 3.01%, 2.86% ± 1.71%, and 2.33% ± 3.95%, respectively. Although one LN status changed from benign to malignant because of contrast-related artifact, there was no up- or down-staging in any of the patients after contrast enhancement. Conclusions An i.v. contrast agent may be used in PET/CT without producing any clinically significant artifact.     

Evaluation of gross tumor size using CT, 18F-FDG PET, integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT and pathological analysis in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

The correlation of gross tumor sizes between combined ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images and macroscopic surgical samples has not yet been studied in detail. In the present study, we compared CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET and combined ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for the delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) and validated the results through examination of the macroscopic surgical specimen.

Methods

Fifty-two operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients had integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans preoperatively and pathological examination post-operation. Four separate maximal tumor sizes at X (lateral direction), Y (ventro-dorsal direction) and Z (cranio-caudal direction) axis were measured on ¹⁸F-FDG PET, CT, combined ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and surgical specimen, respectively. Linear regression was calculated for each of the three imaging measurements versus pathological measurement.

Results

No significant differences were observed among the tumor sizes measured by three images and pathological method. Compared with pathological measurement, CT size at X, Y, Z axis was larger, whereas combined ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET size were smaller. Combined ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT size was more similar to the pathological size than that of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or CT. Results of linear regressions showed that integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was the most accurate modality in measuring the size of cancer.

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT correlates more faithfully with pathological findings than ¹⁸F-FDG PET or CT. Integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is an effective tool to define the target of GTV in radiotherapy.     

Evaluation of62Cu labeled diacetyl-bis(N 4-methylthiosemicarbazone) as a hypoxic tissue tracer in patients with lung cancer

62Cu labeled diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (62Cu-ATSM) has been proposed as a generator-produced, positron-emitting tracer for hypoxic tissue imaging. From basic studies, the retention mechanism of 62Cu-ATSM is considered to be closely related to cytosolic/microsomal bioreduction, a possible system for hypoxic bioreductive drug activation. In order to evaluate the characteristics of 62Cu-ATSM, PET studies were performed in 4 normal subjects and 6 patients with lung cancer. 62Cu-ATSM cleared rapidly from the blood with little lung uptake (0.43+/-0.09, uptake ratio; divided by the arterial input function) in normal subjects. Intense tumor uptake of 62Cu-ATSM was observed in all patients with lung cancer (3.00+/-1.50). A negative correlation was observed between blood flow and flow-normalized 62Cu-ATSM uptake in three of four patients. In contrast, 62Cu-ATSM uptake was not related to that of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. The negative correlation between blood flow and flow normalized 62Cu-ATSM uptake suggests an enhancement of retention of 62Cu-ATSM by low flow. 62Cu-ATSM is a promising PET tracer for tumor imaging, which might bring new information for chemotherapeutic treatment as well as radiotherapy of hypoxic tumors.     

18 FDG PET监测肺癌化疗反应的临床应用

目的 ^18FDG PET监测肺癌化疗效果以调整治疗方案。方法：18例肺癌患者经化疗后1—3月行^18FDG PET全身扫描，评价化疗后疗效，18例均有CT结果比较。结果：18例复发和转移者15例，^18FDG PET发现14例，CT发现13例。原发病灶消失且无复发和转移者3例，^18FDG PET确定3例，CT检查确定2例。监测肺癌化疗效果^18FDG PET敏感性为93．3％，特异性为100％。CT检查敏感性为86．7％，特异性为66．7％。结论：^18FDG PET全身扫描监测肺癌化疗效果优于CT检查。是监测肺癌化疗效果较好的影像方法，能预测治疗效果。     

A contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer: derivation from phantom measurements and validation in patient data

Purpose  An easily applicable algorithm for the FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer was developed by phantom measurements and validated in patient data. Methods  PET scans were performed (ECAT-ART tomograph) on two cylindrical phantoms (phan1, phan2) containing glass spheres of different volumes (7.4–258 ml) which were filled with identical FDG concentrations. Gradually increasing the activity of the fillable background, signal-to-background ratios from 33:1 to 2.5:1 were realised. The mean standardised uptake value (SUV) of the region-of-interest (ROI) surrounded by a 70% isocontour (mSUV₇₀) was used to represent the FDG accumulation of each sphere (or tumour). Image contrast was defined as: where BG is the mean background − SUV. For the spheres of phan1, the threshold SUVs (TS) best matching the known sphere volumes were determined. A regression function representing the relationship between TS/(mSUV₇₀ − BG) and C was calculated and used for delineation of the spheres in phan2 and the gross tumour volumes (GTVs) of eight primary lung tumours. These GTVs were compared to those defined using CT. Results  The relationship between TS/(mSUV₇₀ − BG) and C is best described by an inverse regression function which can be converted to the linear relationship . Using this algorithm, the volumes delineated in phan2 differed by only −0.4 to +0.7 mm in radius from the true ones, whilst the PET-GTVs differed by only −0.7 to +1.2 mm compared with the values determined by CT. Conclusion  By the contrast-oriented algorithm presented in this study, a PET-based delineation of GTVs for primary tumours of lung cancer patients is feasible.     

Integrated FDG-PET/CT vs. standard radiological examinations: Comparison of capability for assessment of postoperative recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to prospectively and directly compare diagnostic capabilities of whole-body integrated FDG-PET/CT and standard radiologic examination for assessment of recurrence in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 92 consecutive pathologically diagnosed NSCLC patients (65 males, 27 females; mean age, 71 years) underwent pathologically and surgically proven complete resection, followed by prospective whole-body FDG-PET/CT and standard radiological examinations. Final diagnosis of recurrence was based on the results of more than 1 year of follow-up and/or pathological examinations. On both methods, the probability of recurrence was assessed in each patient by using a five-point visual scoring system, and the each final diagnosis was made by consensus between two readers. Kappa analyses were performed to determine inter-observer agreement for both methods, and ROC analyses were used to compare capability of the two methods for assessment of postoperative recurrence on a per-patient basis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were also compared between PET/CT and standard radiological examination by means of McNemar's test.

Results

All inter-observer agreements were almost perfect (integrated PET/CT: κ = 0.89; standard radiological examination: κ = 0.81). There were no statistically significant differences in area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between integrated FDG-PET/CT and standard radiologic examinations (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Integrated FDG-PET/CT can be used for assessment of postoperative recurrence in NSCLC patients with accuracy as good as that of standard radiological examinations.     

<Superscript>11</Superscript>C-acetate PET imaging of lung cancer: comparison with <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET and <Superscript>99m</Superscript>Tc-MIBI SPET

Recently carbon-11 acetate (AC) positron emission tomography (PET) has been reported to be of clinical value for the diagnosis of cancer that is negative on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucoce (FDG) PET. We investigated the uptake of AC in lung cancer to determine whether this tracer is of potential value for tumour detection and characterisation, and to compare AC PET imaging with FDG PET and technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) single-photon emission tomography (SPET). Twenty-three patients with 25 lung cancers underwent AC and FDG PET. Twenty of 23 patients were also investigated with MIBI SPET. Dynamic images were acquired for 26 min after the injection of 555 MBq of AC. Standardised uptake values (SUVs) and/or tumour to non-tumour activity ratios (T/N) for each tumour were investigated at 10–20 min after AC administration, 40–60 min after administration of 185 MBq FDG and 15–45 min after administration of 555 MBq MIBI. Twenty lung cancers were resected surgically, and the degree of tracer uptake in the primary lesion was correlated with histopathological features (cell dedifferentiation and aggressiveness) and prognosis. Rapid uptake of AC followed by extremely slow clearance was observed. For the purpose of tumour identification, AC PET was inferior to FDG PET in 8 of 25 (32%) lung cancers, and the T/N of AC was lower than that of FDG. However, AC PET was superior to FDG PET in the identification of a slow-growing tumour (bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma). There was a positive correlation between AC uptake (T/N) and MIBI uptake (T/N) (r=0.799, P<0.0001). A positive correlation was not observed between either AC or MIBI uptake and the degree of cell dedifferentiation in lung adenocarcinomas, whereas FDG uptake did correlate with the degree of cell dedifferentiation. In lung adenocarcinoma, there was a weak correlation between aggressiveness and FDG uptake, but no correlation was evident for AC and MIBI. In addition, a positive correlation was not observed between AC or MIBI uptake and postoperative recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma, whereas FDG uptake did correlate with postoperative recurrence. Thus, the greater the FDG uptake, the higher the malignant grade. In conclusion, for the purpose of tumour identification, AC PET was inferior to FDG PET but superior to MIBI SPET. Neither AC nor MIBI uptake reflects the malignant grade in lung adenocarcinoma, whereas FDG uptake does. AC PET is less diagnostically informative than FDG PET in patients with lung cancer. However, AC PET may play a complementary role in the identification of low-grade malignancies that are not FDG avid.     

18F-FDG PET/CT代谢参数与晚期非小细胞肺癌一线免疫治疗联合化疗预后的关系

目的探讨基线氟-18-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)代谢参数与晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合化疗预后的关系。方法回顾性分析2019至2021年于郑州大学附属肿瘤医院接受基线PET/CT检查且行一线ICI联合化疗的晚期NSCLC患者。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)获得总肿瘤代谢体积(TMTV)、糖酵解总量(TLG)和最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)与一线ICI联合化疗预后的最佳临界值, 并收集患者外周血指标, 采用Kaplan-Meier法、Log-rank法及Cox回归计算总生存(OS)及无进展生存(PFS)。结果共入组44例患者。单因素分析显示, TMTV>119.5 cm3及转移灶数量>3个与较差的PFS有关(χ2=4.19、11.28, P<0.05);TMTV>119.5 cm3及TLG>424.3与较差的OS有关(χ2=14.96、6.05, P<0.05)。多因素分析显示, 转移灶数量是PFS的独立预后因素(P=0.011), TMTV是OS的独立预后因素(P=0...     

Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is an important staging procedure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to demonstrate, through a decision tree model and the incorporation of real costs of each component, that routine FDG-PET imaging as a prelude to curative surgery will reduce requirements for routine mediastinoscopy and overall hospital costs.Methods A decision tree model comparing routine whole-body FDG-PET imaging to routine staging mediastinoscopy was used, with baseline variables of sensitivity, specificity and prevalence of non-operable and metastatic disease obtained from institutional data and a literature review. Costings for hospital admissions for mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy of actual patients with NSCLC were determined. The overall and average cost of managing patients was then calculated over a range of FDG-PET costs to derive projected cost savings to the community.Results The prevalence of histologically proven mediastinal involvement in patients with NSCLC presenting for surgical assessment at our institution is 20%, and the prevalence of distant metastatic disease is 6%. Based on literature review, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for detection of mediastinal spread are 84% and 89% respectively, and for mediastinoscopy, 81% and 100%. The average cost of mediastinoscopy for NSCLC in our institution is AUD$4,160, while that of thoracotomy is AUD$15,642. The cost of an FDG-PET scan is estimated to be AUD$1,500. Using these figures and the decision tree model, the average cost saving is AUD$2,128 per patient.Conclusion Routine FDG-PET scanning with selective mediastinoscopy will save AUD$2,128 per patient and will potentially reduce inappropriate surgery. These cost savings remain robust over a wide range of disease prevalence and FDG-PET costs.     

Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with respect to lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer, and to ascertain the factors that affect this accuracy.Methods Seventy-three patients with advanced gastric cancer, verified in all cases by endoscopic biopsy, were enrolled in this prospective study. We conducted FDG PET and other routine preoperative studies, including abdominal computed tomography (CT). Patients underwent either curative-intent gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy (n=67) or exploratory laparotomy. The Japanese system for the classification of gastric cancer was used for LN assessment.Results FDG PET was able to detect primary lesions in 70 of the 73 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value of FDG PET for LN metastasis were 40%, 95%, 91% and 56%, respectively. Signet-ring cell carcinoma was associated with the lowest sensitivity (15%), whereas other cell types could be detected with moderate sensitivity (30–71%) and high specificity (93–100%). According to multiple logistic regression, the standardised uptake value for primary tumours was the only independent variable to be significantly related to sensitivity for LN metastasis (p=0.02, odds ratio=1.14). CT was superior to PET in terms of sensitivity (p<0.0001), and PET was superior to CT in terms of specificity (p<0.0001) and PPV (p=0.05).Conclusion FDG PET exhibits good specificity for LN staging of gastric cancer, and FDG uptake in the primary tumour is significantly related to the accuracy of FDG PET. Despite some clear limitations, FDG PET proved useful in the LN staging of FDG-avid gastric cancer.Seok-Ki Kim and Keon Wook Kang contributed equally to this paper.