Dorsal column function after epidural and spinal blockade: implications for the safety of walking following low-dose regional analgesia for labour

Walking after regional blockade for labour using low-dose combinations of bupivacaine and fentanyl is possible due to the maintenance of lower limb motor power. In order to investigate concerns that dorsal column function, important in maintaining balance, is impaired after such techniques, clinical assessment of lower limb proprioception and vibration sense was evaluated in parturients after either low-dose epidural ( n  = 30) or spinal blockade ( n  = 30) for labour analgesia and compared with spinal anaesthesia ( n  = 30) for elective Caesarean section using a larger total dose of local anaesthetic. Of the patients receiving low-dose regional labour analgesia 7% ( n  = 4) had abnormal dorsal column function compared with 97% ( n  = 29) receiving spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section (p < 0.001). All patients in the Caesarean section group developed lower limb motor weakness, compared with only 10% ( n  = 6) in the low-dose groups (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the low-dose groups with respect to sensory block, motor block or dorsal column function. Overall, 90% of patients receiving low-dose bupivacaine/fentanyl regional labour analgesia had both normal lower limb motor power and dorsal column function. Assessment of these parameters is recommended before allowing patients to walk after low-dose regional techniques for labour.     

Epidural anaesthesia for labour and Caesarean section in a parturient with a single ventricle and transposition of the great arteries

We describe a case of a 29-year-old parturient with a single ventricle and transposition of the great arteries who had lumbar epidural analgesia/anaesthesia with a local anaesthetic for labour, emergency Caesarean section and postoperative pain. Her outcome and that of her baby was successful. The anaesthetic techniques used in other parturients with similar congenital cardiac anomalies are reviewed.     

Obstetrical anaesthesia in Ontario

The purpose of this study was to determine the availability of regional anaesthesia for Caesarean section, of epidural opioids and patient-controlled analgesia after Caesarean section, and of epidural and other forms of analgesia in labour. A mail survey was sent to the “Head Nurse, Department of Obstetrics” at each of the 142 hospitals in Ontario with designated obstetric beds. Responses were obtained from 100% of hospitals. For Caesarean Section, general anaesthesia was used in all hospitals, and was the only option in seven. Epidural anaesthesia was used in 93% of hospitals, and spinal anaesthesia in 48%. Postoperatively, patient-controlled analgesia was used in 31% of hospitals and spinal opioids in 28%. In 66 hospitals, im or iv opioids were the only types of analgesia available. For analgesia in labour, im or iv opioids were used in 96% of hospitals, nitrous oxide was used in 75%, epidural analgesia in 75%, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in 52% and patient-controlled analgesia in 10%. The overall epidural rate was 38%. Although the average rate in the 73 hospitals with fewer than 500 births per year was only 6% 14 large hospitals had an epidural rate of 60% or higher. It is concluded that regional techniques for peripartum analgesia have been widely accepted. Analgesia after Caesarean section could be improved. Epidural analgesia should be more widely available, especially in the many small hospitals in Ontario.     

The extension of epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section: a survey of current UK practice

The conversion of epidural analgesia during labour to surgical anaesthesia for Caesarean section can have important medical and medicolegal implications. This survey sought to establish the current management for extending epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section. A postal questionnaire was sent to the lead obstetric anaesthetist in all maternity units in the UK (n = 254). The response rate was 82% (n = 209). Of those surveyed, 68% (136) give the full dose of the local anaesthetic mixture in the delivery room, whilst 12.5% (25) initiate the top-up in the delivery room and give the remainder of the dose in theatre. Fifteen per cent (30) transfer the woman to theatre before commencing anaesthesia and 34% (68) give a test dose before the full anaesthetic dose. Guidelines for converting labour analgesia to anaesthesia for emergency Caesarean section were available in 64% (128) units. Bupivacaine 0.5% was the most commonly used agent, being used as the sole agent by 41.5% (81) units and in combination by a further 18% (36). Adrenaline was added to the chosen local anaesthetic by 30% (60) whilst 12% (24) added bicarbonate. In all, 13 combinations of local anaesthetics and adjuncts were used. The mode time to transfer the patient to theatre was 1 min. Of the 161 respondents who commenced anaesthesia in the delivery room, 71% (114) did not monitor the patient during transfer, whilst 87% (140) had ephedrine immediately available. Thirty-three respondents reported a total of 43 adverse incidents associated with the extension of epidural blockade. These included high blocks, inadequate blocks and possible intravascular injections, the latter resulting in two seizures and one cardiac arrest.     

Obstetric outcome following epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-adrenaline 0.25% or bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil - a prospective randomized controlled study in 1000 parturients

Background: Epidural analgesia (EDA) is the most efficient method for pain relief during labour, but there is still a debate as to whether it interferes with the normal process of delivery. Some authors argue that the incidence of instrumental deliveries, Caesarean section, malrotation and protracted labour is increased in parturients receiving EDA.
Methods: 1000 parturients were prospectively randomized to receive EDA either with a high dose of local anaesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline=HD) or with a low dose (0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil 10 μg=LD).
Results: The incidence of instrumental delivery and Caesarean section and the need for oxytocin was reduced in the LD compared to HD group. The delivery time was similar with HD and LD among primiparous, but decreased significantly among multiparous in the LD group. The incidence of malrotation was low in both groups. The quality of analgesia was equal during the first stage in the 2 groups, but was lower in the LD group during the second stage. More parturients in the LD group ambulated, but this did not affect the incidence of instrumental delivery.
Conclusion: It is concluded that a lower dosage of bupivacaine combined with sufentanil in epidural analgesia significantly improves the obstetric outcome as compared to a higher dosage of bupivacaine with adrenaline using intermittent bolus technique.     

Obstetrical anaesthesia and porphyrias

Acute hepatic porphyrias are genetic diseases, characterized by acute neurological symptoms, sometimes fatal, triggered by different factors, in particular by many anaesthetic drugs, and also by pregnancy. We report here the experience of three porphyric patients'deliveries, allowing us to consider a proposition of management in this context. After discussion between anaesthesiologist, obstetrician and porphyria specialist, two types of management of such patients can be foresee. Asymptomatic patients, or in long remission, can benefit from locoregional anesthesia techniques with bupivacaine for both labour analgesia and Caesarean section. Spinal anaesthesia is then the technique of choice, allowing using smaller quantity of local anaesthetic than epidural anaesthesia. For symptomatic patients, or in crisis, we have rather choose intravenous narcotics for labour analgesia, and general anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The hypnotic agent of choice for both induction and maintenance of such anaesthesia is then propofol.     

General anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for primary caesarean section--a comparative study.

Forty-seven healthy parturients undergoing elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to either general anaesthesia (n = 24) or epidural anaesthesia (n = 23) under standardized anaesthetic and surgical conditions. Seven women of the epidural group required additional systemic analgesia or sedation following delivery of the neonate. Nine of 24 newborns obtained 1-min Apgar scores below 7 after general anaesthesia compared to only 3/23 after epidural anaesthesia. The time period to establish normal colour in the babies was 2.2 min after epidural and 4.9 min after general anaesthesia. Three of the 24 general-anaesthesia newborns demonstrated a tendency to hypotonia compared to only one in the epidural group. Twenty-four hours and 7 days after delivery all infants of both groups were completely normal. At the time of delivery maternal PO2 was higher in the general anaesthesia compared to the epidural group, due to higher inspired oxygen concentrations. Comparable results were obtained in umbilical PO2 venous values; lower pH values, however, were observed in the umbilical artery after general anaesthesia. There were no significant differences in the glucose levels between the groups. A significant correlation was established between uterine incision-delivery interval and 1-min neonatal Apgar scores in the general-anaesthesia group, but not in the epidural group. Our investigation did not show either the incision-delivery interval or the start of operation-delivery interval to play a role in neonatal outcome. Epidural anaesthesia is superior to general anaesthesia in Caesarean section under normal conditions with regard to neonatal outcome. Whether this is also true for critical conditions cannot be concluded from this study.     

Extension of epidural blockade in labour for emergency Caesarean section using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and fentanyl, with or without alkalinisation

In a randomised, double-blind study, we investigated rapid extension of epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for emergency Caesarean section. Parturients receiving epidural analgesia in labour who subsequently required Caesarean section were given a test dose of 3 ml lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1 : 200 000, followed 3 min later by 12 ml lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1 : 200 000 and fentanyl 75 microg, to which was added 1.2 ml sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (bicarbonate group; n = 20) or saline (saline group; n = 20). Mean (SD [range]) time to surgical anaesthesia was less in the bicarbonate group (5.2 (1.5) [2-8] min) than the saline group (9.7 (1.6) [6-12] min; mean difference 4.5 min (95% CI 3.5-5.5) min; p < 0.001). Maternal side-effects and neonatal outcome were similar between groups. We conclude that pH-adjusted lidocaine 2% with epinephrine and fentanyl is effective for rapidly establishing surgical anaesthesia in patients with a functioning epidural catheter for labour who require emergency Caesarean section.     

Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in advanced labour

The combined spinal-epidural technique is a modification of epidural analgesia which combines the rapid onset of spinal analgesia with the flexibility of an epidural catheter. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of an intrathecal opioid — low-dose local anaesthetic combination for parturients in advanced labour, a setting where satisfactory epidural analgesia is often difficult to achieve. The technique was evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized trial using parturients in advanced, active labour for the provision of pain relief during the late first stage and second stage of labour. Thirty-eight term parturients in active, advanced labour received a spinal injection of bu-pivacaine 2.5 mg and sufentanil, 10 μg, via a 25- or 27-gauge Whitacre needle placed into the subarachnoid space through a 17- or 18- gauge Weiss epidural needle which had been placed into the epidural space. This was followed by placement of an epidural catheter for supplemental analgesia if required. Onset of analgesia was noted by asking patients if their contractions were comfortable. Motor blockade was assessed using the Bromage criteria. Patients were asked if they experienced either pruritus or nausea on a four-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe). The mean cervical dilatation at placement of the spinal medication was 6.1 ± 2.2 cm. Thirty-two patients had spontaneous vaginal delivery, two were delivered by outlet forceps, and four by Caesarean section. Onset of analgesia was rapid (< five minutes) in all cases. Twenty-three patients (60%) delivered vaginally with no additional anaesthetic. The remaining 15 had supplemental local anaesthetic given via the epidural catheter, a mean of 123 ± 33 min after the original spinal dose. Side effects were limited to pruritus in eight (21%) patients, and mild lower extremity motor weakness in one patient. One patient experienced transient hypotension. No patient developed postdural puncture headache. This technique allows for profound analgesia with a rapid onset and few bothersome side effects. In particular, the absence of motor blockade may facilitate maternal expulsive efforts or positioning during the second stage of labour.     

Anaesthetic management of labour and delivery in the parturient with mitochondrial myopathy

Purpose

We describe the anaesthetic management for Caesarean section in a parturient with a defect in complex III of the respiratory chain who had increased lactate concentrations at rest and with exercise.

Clinical features

We administered effective epidural anaesthesia with lidocaine for Caesarean delivery. The serum lactate concentration was less than the preoperative value both during and after surgery. Shivering during the perioperative period was avoided by administering warm iv fluids, warm local anaesthetic solution and epidural meperidine. Pain relief after surgery was provided with iv PCA morphine augmented by local infiltration with bupivacaine to fascia and skin edges and epidural injection with meperidine.

Conclusion

Mitochondrial myopathies are an uncommon group of disorders in which mitochondrial dysfunction leads to clinical disease of muscle and sometimes of other organs with high energy requirements. The management of labour and delivery in women with mitochondrial myopathies should be individualized according to severity of disease and formulated by consultation between attending physicians and the anaesthetist. Epidural analgesia reduces stress and work associated with labour and reduces oxygen demand during labour. However, parturients with defects of the respiratory chain with documented increased lactate concentrations at rest and with exercise are best managed with elective Caesarean delivery with regional anaesthesia to prevent life-threatening lactic acidosis during labour. The association between malignant hyperthermia and these disorders has not been proved, but it appears prudent to consider these women as MH susceptible until definitive data regarding this possible relationship are available.     

A comparison between epidural anaesthesia using alkalinized solution and spinal (combined spinal/epidural) anaesthesia for elective caesarean section

In a double-blind investigation, 40 women undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section were randomly divided into two groups. Group I (n = 20) received spinal anaesthesia with 2.0 ml hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine using a single space combined spinal epidural technique. Group II (n = 20) received epidural anaesthesia with a local anaesthetic mixture consisting of 0.5% bupivacaine plain 10 ml and 2% lignocaine plain 10 ml to which was added 0.1 ml of adrenaline 1 in 1000 and 2 ml of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The mean onset times of sensory block to T4 and grade 3 motor blockade were 7.9 min and 9.5 min respectively in the spinal group, compared to 13.1 min and 16.3 min in the epidural group. These differences were both significant (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in the quality of analgesia or the incidence of hypotension and nausea. The relatively rapid onset of the pH adjusted epidural solution may provide an attractive alternative to spinal anaesthesia. Moreover, this study underlines the important role of pH adjusted epidural solutions in parturients progressing to emergency caesarean section with epidural catheters previously inserted for labour analgesia.     

Challenges that opioid-dependent women present to the obstetric anaesthetist

A retrospective casenote review was performed to identify anaesthetic challenges relevant to the opioid-dependent obstetric population. Medical records showed that of the 7,449 deliveries during a 24 month period, 85 women (1.1%) were taking regular opioids such as methadone and/or heroin. Of these 67 (79%) received anaesthetic services, ten of whom (11.7%) were referred antenatally. Forty opioid-dependent women (47%) received epidural analgesia in labour compared with the overall hospital rate of 38%. Twenty-three women (27%) delivered by caesarean section: five received general anaesthesia, five combined spinal anaesthesia, five spinal anaesthesia and eight epidural anaesthesia. Twenty opioid-dependent women (23.5%) had documented problems related to labour analgesia and 17 (74%) had problems with analgesia after caesarean section. A variety of postoperative analgesia methods were administered in addition to maintenance methadone. Fourteen patients (16.5%) had difficult intravenous access and seven "arrest" calls were documented. One anaesthetist was exposed to hepatitis C. This review demonstrates the demands placed on obstetric anaesthetic services by opioid-dependent women. Early antenatal referral for anaesthetic review is recommended.     

Effects of volume and concentration of lidocaine on epidural anaesthesia in pregnant females

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effects of altering the concentration of a local anaesthetic on the development of epidural anaesthesia in pregnant females are unclear. We compared the anaesthetic effects of a constant dose of two different concentrations of epidural lidocaine for Caesarean section. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, patients undergoing elective Caesarean section were randomized to receive either lidocaine 1% 30 mL (+epinephrine 5 microg mL(-1)) or lidocaine 2% 15 mL (+epinephrine 5 microg mL(-1)) (n = 20 each) for epidural anaesthesia at the L1-L2 interspace. The spread of the sensory block to pinprick and the degree of motor block (modified Bromage scale) were measured at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min after injection. RESULTS: No significant differences in the progression of analgesia and motor block were observed at any time between 1 and 2% lidocaine. The maximum cephalad spread was observed 30 min after injection; the median was at T4 (range T3-T5) and at T4 (range T3-T6) for lidocaine 1 and 2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The same doses but different volumes of lidocaine 1 and 2% produced comparable anaesthetic effects in pregnant females. The effects of epidural anaesthesia depend primarily on the total dose of the local anaesthetic.     

Extending epidural analgesia for emergency Caesarean section: a meta-analysis

There is no high-level evidence supporting an optimal top-up solution to convert labour epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the best epidural solutions for emergency Caesarean section anaesthesia, with respect to rapid onset and low supplementation of intraoperative block. Eleven randomized controlled trials, involving 779 parturients, were identified for inclusion after a systematic literature search and risk of bias assessment. 'Top-up' boluses were classified into three groups: 0.5% bupivacaine or levobupivacaine (Bup/Levo); lidocaine and epinephrine, with or without fentanyl (LE ± F); and 0.75% ropivacaine (Ropi). Pooled analysis using the fixed-effects method was used to calculate the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. Lidocaine and epinephrine, with or without fentanyl, resulted in a significantly faster onset of sensory block [MD -4.51 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.89 to -3.13 min, P < 0.00001]. Bup/Levo was associated with a significantly increased risk of intraoperative supplementation compared with the other groups (RR 2.03; 95% CI 1.22-3.39; P = 0.007), especially compared with Ropi (RR 3.24, 95% CI 1.26-8.33, P=0.01). Adding fentanyl to a local anaesthetic resulted in a significantly faster onset but did not affect the need for intraoperative supplementation. Bupivacaine or levobupivacaine 0.5% was the least effective solution. If the speed of onset is important, then a lidocaine and epinephrine solution, with or without fentanyl, appears optimal. If the quality of epidural block is paramount, then 0.75% ropivacaine is suggested.     

Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery in a parturient with congenital hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

We report a parturient delivering vaginally at term with symptomatic congenital hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Epidural analgesia was used during labour and delivery and is likely to have made a useful contribution to the successful outcome. Although controversial, reported use of epidural analgesia during labour for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy parturients has been generally positive. A multi-disciplinary team approach, early anaesthetic assessment and a carefully managed epidural catheter inserted in early labour can optimize analgesia and minimize the stresses of labour and vaginal delivery provided the risks of reduced preload and afterload are minimized.     

The extension of labour epidural analgesia for Caesarean section

Seven hundred and twenty-two patients who received epidural analgesia during labour were delivered by Caesarean section. The block was extended in 554 patients to provide analgesia for surgery. In twenty-one cases incomplete analgesia necessitated general anaesthesia. The main complications were maternal hypotension (15.9%) and vomiting (17.1%). Almost all patients expressed enthusiasm for the technique.     

Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia in SARS-CoV-2-positive parturients across 10 maternity units in the north-west of England: a retrospective cohort study

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have reported anaesthetic outcomes in parturients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We reviewed the labour analgesic and anaesthetic interventions utilised in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients who had a confirmed positive test for SARS-CoV-2 across 10 hospitals in the north-west of England between 1 April 2020 and 31 May 2021. Primary outcomes analysed included the analgesic/anaesthetic technique utilised for labour and caesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of maternal characteristics, caesarean birth rate, maternal critical care admission rate along with adverse composite neonatal outcomes. A positive SARS-CoV-2 test was recorded in 836 parturients with 263 (31.4%) reported to have symptoms of COVID-19. Neuraxial labour analgesia was utilised in 104 (20.4%) of the 509 parturients who went on to have a vaginal birth. No differences in epidural analgesia rates were observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (OR 1.03, 95%CI 0.64–1.67; p = 0.90). The neuraxial anaesthesia rate in 310 parturients who underwent caesarean delivery was 94.2% (95%CI 90.6–96.0%). The rates of general anaesthesia were similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (6% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.52). Symptomatic parturients were more likely to be multiparous (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.19–2.22; p = 0.002); of Asian ethnicity (OR 1.54, 1.04–2.28; p = 0.03); to deliver prematurely (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.47–3.19; p = 0.001); have a higher caesarean birth rate (44.5% vs. 33.7%; OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.16–2.12; p = 0.008); and a higher critical care utilisation rate both pre- (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and post-delivery (11% vs. 3.5%; OR 3.43, 95%CI 1.83–6.52; p = 0.001). Eight neonates tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 while no differences in adverse composite neonatal outcomes were observed between those born to symptomatic and asymptomatic mothers (25.8% vs. 23.8%; OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.78–1.57; p = 0.55). In women with COVID-19, non-neuraxial analgesic regimens were commonly utilised for labour while neuraxial anaesthesia was employed for the majority of caesarean births. Symptomatic women with COVID-19 are at increased risk of significant maternal morbidity including preterm birth, caesarean birth and peripartum critical care admission.     

Emergency Caesarean section: best practice

Good multidisciplinary communication is crucial to the safe management of women requiring non-elective Caesarean section. Anaesthetists should participate actively in resuscitation of the fetus in utero; relief of aortocaval compression is paramount. Epidural top-up with levobupivacaine 0.5% is the anaesthetic of choice for women who have been receiving labour epidural analgesia. If epidural top-up fails to provide bilateral light touch anaesthesia from S5 - T5, a combined spinal-epidural technique with small intrathecal dose of local anaesthetic is a useful approach. Pre-eclampsia is not a contra-indication to single-shot spinal anaesthesia, which is the technique of choice for most women presenting for Caesarean section without an epidural catheter in situ. Induction and maintenance doses of drugs for general anaesthesia should not be reduced in the belief that the baby will be harmed. Early postoperative observations are geared towards the detection of overt or covert haemorrhage.     

Cathétérisation accidentelle de l'espace sous-dural extra-arachnoïdien lors d'une analgésie péridurale en obstétrique

The authors describe a case of accidental catheterization of the subdural extra-arachnoid space during epidural analgesia for labour. The epidural catheter had been inserted at the L3–L4 interspace without any problem. A severe hypotension occurred 90 min after the onset of analgesia. A T4 upper sensory level was associated with a complete motor blockade. Total spinal anaesthesia was suspected but ruled out because of delayed onset of analgesia. Extensive epidural anaesthesia was also eliminated as the local anaesthetic dose (15 mL of bupivacaine 0.125 %) was not excessive for this patient. After delivery, a water-soluble contrast medium (10 mL of Omnipaque® 180) was injected through the catheter and subsequent radiograph of spine showed subdural spread of the contrast medium. This complication might occur more frequently than usually thought and may be life-threatening. Anaesthetic management is discussed in the case of Caesarean section during labour.     

Sciatic nerve palsy following childbirth

Two cases are reported of sciatic nerve palsy after delivery by Caesarean section in primigravidae. One mother was slender and had an emergency Caesarean section for failure to progress with a breech presentation. Epidural analgesia during labour was extended for operative delivery. The other mother was obese, mildly hypertensive, had a large baby with a high head and was delivered by elective Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. She experienced severe intrapartum hypotension. Both patients suffered right sided sciatic nerve palsy. The aetiologies of obstetric palsies and those following regional block are reviewed and the importance of careful diagnosis and of avoiding peripheral nerve compression during regional block are emphasised.